Worldwide Campaign to stop the Abuse and Torture of Mind Control/DEWs
I organize a survey on poll.gangstalkingwiki.com
The goal is to find out what you believe, not what you can prove.
It takes about 40 minutes to complete.
Recently Dr. Lorraine Sheridan published a study which is very negative for targeted individuals. Her study is based on things that targets wrote in 2004-2005 in a free text box in a survey on www.stalkingsurvey.com. She says that gang stalking is delusional in basis, that our claims should not be investigated and that we should be sent to psychiatry. But she doesn't say what targets believe. She just didn't investigate. My survey tries to find out.
Tags:
Dr. Lorraine Sheridan is a negationist then. There always has been negationists and, alas, therealways will be.
considering that sheridan obviously seeks to discredit those who report something she has unscientifically decided in advance isn't real, a subjective survey of what targets believe or think is going on ought to give her lots of ammo
once dr sheridan is appraised of the disclosures given us by the late ted gunderson, and especially the involuntarily leaked document on overt harassment by julainne mckinney*, if after that she still maintains this unscientific posture, someone ought to send her to get her own head examined there is more than enough proof of gang-stalking - not that the state is going to be any more interested in seeing it than this apparent charlatan has been
if you want to counter-balance her (in my view clearly deliberately slanted) perspective with 'counter-testimonies' of more sensible things which also can't be proved, you are just playing right in to her hands - she does not WANT to see contradictory evidence, and is most likely continuing the same discrediting exercise we saw on muertos's flagrant cointelpro disinfo hit piece's on myron may, with its portrayal of all targets as "delusional conspiritards""
.
http://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=2351430%3ABlogPost3...
.
*http://sm4csi.home.xs4all.nl/nwo/MindControl/Microwave.Harassment.A...:
.
Overt Harassment—which obviously is meant to be observed—may be intended to “precondition” individuals for eventual long-term electronic harassment. Persons terrified by unexplained overt harassment are not likely to cope with the sudden onset of electronic harassment in any more reasoned fashion. This phased pattern of harassment is apparent in all of the cases now being investigated. The fact that the overt harassment continues in these cases even after the electronic targeting commences suggests that the objective is to maintain long-term extremes of stress.
Many of the overt harassment tactics discussed below are surfacing in cases which (so far) have not involved discernible forms of electronic harassment. These are cases involving so-called “whistleblowers” who, because of their inside knowledge of certain potentially newsworthy events, pose particular threats of embarrassment to the Government or to government-affiliated employers. We have noticed that electronic harassment is beginning to surface as a form of retaliation against persons who try to assist electronic “harassees.”
.
LB
take a look at member miss sickofit's hundreds and years of photographic evidence - putting that together with the fact the her neighbours have already provided descriptions of the two drools who enter her place every time she leaves, it then becomes clear enough from their M.O. that gathering evidence is not the problem but do you not see how a general survey of our "beliefs" opens the door for david of tomorrow and others whose function it is to discredit us all by word an example to fill in exactly whatever ms sheridan (or whichever state institution is funding her 'fact-finding' mission) wants?
.
paralyzing pessimism can be just another form of negativity and this is not my intention at all but i do notice that, even on this site and despite the moderators' best efforts, trolls usually seem to outnumber genuine targets by a clear majority, and therefore i am admittedly a little skeptical about the chances of obtaining an honest and representative sample
Doctors call us delusional because government publishes nothing about gang stalking.
It has nothing to do with what victims say or write.
Dr. Lorraine Sheridan says clearly in her study that nothing has been published about gang stalking, which means: government published nothing.
Look, if we don't say what happened to us, then nothing will be written about it.
For 5 years I answered every email from victims.
Sometimes they asked me: what can I do to help myself and others?
Well, this poll is something that you can do.
The poll is anonymous by the way.
that answers my question nicely thank you, cliff
"Investigators" like Dr Lorraine who dont investigate objectively give me ths shits. One day ppl like this could encounter harassment and wonder who belongs in the psych unit.
Where is her "study" Cliff, do you have a link?
OK Cliff, I checked your poll and taken it, and I wonder does anyone ever checks my website www.madminster.net ??
I don't get of what kind of "perp" secret cameras are you talking about? Leading to more paranoid states in someone.
For a blacklisted victim who probably has a hard luck story as I have everyone is a "perp" and fucking cameras are in eyes powered by batteries inside of chest... Do you have it? I seriously doubt it.
I think that I found it here: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/278406061_Complaints_of_gro...
Then I converted it and placed it on my website, here: http://gangstalkingwiki.com/#eBooks Then scroll down to "Kooky stuff", then it's the seventh item.
Sue said:
"Investigators" like Dr Lorraine who dont investigate objectively give me ths shits. One day ppl like this could encounter harassment and wonder who belongs in the psych unit.
Where is her "study" Cliff, do you have a link?
The poll has moved to http://php.gangstalkingwiki.com/Poll.htm
but php.gangstalkingwiki.com doesn't exist yet, but the following link works already:
http://gangstalkingwiki.com/php/Poll.htm
@madminster it looks like the perps replaced your answers with my own answers.
Hi Cliff,
May be my connexion is hacked ( that's sure) or may be there is some more and diffrenet prob. since the link ends up on a missing page.
I'll try again in a couple of days
Bonne soirée
Lez
This is interesting....just quotes and some of my thoughts on this
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/278406061_Complaints_of_gro...
There have been suggestions that many group-stalking reports may be delusional
and therefore false in nature. Yet, this has not been empirically tested
and there is no guidance for those who encounter such cases, such as law
enforcement agencies and mental health professionals, as to how they might be
approached. In particular, it is important that limited police and criminal justice
resources should not be consumed in investigating cases which have no merit,
and, on the other hand, that reports of group-stalking should not be dismissed
by professionals based on untested assumptions. There is also no reason to
assume that victims of delusional stalking do not suffer the same psychological
sequelae as victims in cases where the stalking is real.
Again we see there is “this has not been empirically tested
and there is no guidance for those who encounter such cases, such as law
enforcement agencies and mental health professionals”
also this
There is also no reason to
assume that victims of delusional stalking do not suffer the same psychological
sequelae as victims in cases where the stalking is real.
Again its the psychological impact on the victim that's important to note ….not weather its real or not …
or from my position I believe only sometimes its real ..to destabilize the victim plus other factors that combine to overwhelm the victim
now when you know its there is a psychological effect involved ….you can learn ways to cope and deal with this ...to gain some control over the situation ok
hmm
Effect on victims ’ mental state (see Table 2)
The group-stalked were significantly more likely than the individually-stalked
to complain of being very scared, of feeling that they were going mad, of feeling
depressed, and of symptoms associated with depression: suicidal thoughts;
weight change; sleep disturbance; weakness; and tiredness. The group-stalking
cases were significantly more likely to report increased distrust and increased
aggressiveness towards others than individually-stalked cases. There were no
significant differences concerning anxiety, panic attacks, anger, or suicide
attempts. The group-stalked did not feel subjectively more paranoid. They were
significantly more likely than individually stalked cases to think the stalking
had changed their priorities in life, but less likely to believe that it had
changed their personality.
Interesting
They were
significantly more likely than individually stalked cases to think the stalking
had changed their priorities in life, but less likely to believe that it had
changed their personality.
Again this is were I believe that victims believe they are responding correctly to what they believe they are experiencing ...but don't notice the effect it has on their personality especially over a long period months /years
another interesting part
Many stalking behaviours described were simply impossible. The
remainder were such as to admit only of two possibilities: either the stalking
was delusional, or the individuals were victims of elaborate and extremely
expensive behaviour organised, for no apparent reason, by those with huge personal
wealth or by government agencies. It might be suggested that some cases
could have concerned overvalued ideas, rather than delusions, influenced by
the Internet (e.g. Anti-Gangstalking Network, n.d; Fight Gang Stalking, n.d)
and societal sub-groups where belief in conspiracy theories is widespread. By
an overvalued idea is meant ‘an acceptable, comprehensible idea pursued
The Journal o f Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 19
beyond the bounds of reason’ (McKenna, 1984), this being differentiated from
a delusion in DSM-V by the criterion that the belief does not encompass the
‘possibility that the belief might not be true’ (APA, 2013, p. 286). We found
no evidence in terms of fixity of belief that the cases in question should be
considered as exhibiting overvalued ideas rather than delusions; and, in terms
of ideas held by societal sub-groups, those complaining of group-stalking presented
as targeted individuals, not as members of targeted groups or subgroups.
The fundamental finding remains that the reported group-stalking was
not a real phenomenon, except in the minds of those complaining of it.
Again point to note about PTSD
Those who perceive themselves as being stalked by groups had a clear
need for psychiatric support, quite apart from any need for treatment for their
delusional states. In this study, they scored significantly more highly than those
stalked by individuals, both in terms of depressive and post-traumatic symptoms.
http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/post-traumatic-stress...
Symptoms
Post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms may start within three months of a traumatic event, but sometimes symptoms may not appear until years after the event. These symptoms cause significant problems in social or work situations and in relationships.
PTSD symptoms are generally grouped into four types: intrusive memories, avoidance, negative changes in thinking and mood, or changes in emotional reactions.
Intrusive memories
Symptoms of intrusive memories may include:
Recurrent, unwanted distressing memories of the traumatic event
Reliving the traumatic event as if it were happening again (flashbacks)
Upsetting dreams about the traumatic event
Severe emotional distress or physical reactions to something that reminds you of the event
Avoidance
Symptoms of avoidance may include:
Trying to avoid thinking or talking about the traumatic event
Avoiding places, activities or people that remind you of the traumatic event
Negative changes in thinking and mood
Symptoms of negative changes in thinking and mood may include:
Negative feelings about yourself or other people
Inability to experience positive emotions
Feeling emotionally numb
Lack of interest in activities you once enjoyed
Hopelessness about the future
Memory problems, including not remembering important aspects of the traumatic event
Difficulty maintaining close relationships
Changes in emotional reactions
Symptoms of changes in emotional reactions (also called arousal symptoms) may include:
Irritability, angry outbursts or aggressive behavior
Always being on guard for danger
Overwhelming guilt or shame
Self-destructive behavior, such as drinking too much or driving too fast
Trouble concentrating
Trouble sleeping
Being easily startled or frightened
Intensity of symptoms
PTSD symptoms can vary in intensity over time. You may have more PTSD symptoms when you're stressed in general, or when you run into reminders of what you went through. For example, you may hear a car backfire and relive combat experiences. Or you may see a report on the news about a sexual assault and feel overcome by memories of your own assault.
Again these symptoms are just going to blur/feed your sense of being “gangstalked”
this is why you need to break this destructive ever increasing looping cycle
© 2021 Created by Soleilmavis.
Powered by