Worldwide Campaign to stop the Abuse and Torture of Mind Control/DEWs
God gave mankind freedom and liberty. God never controlled mankind’s minds. Only Satan and his supporters wanted to control mankind’s minds. Nazis were the first to develop the mind control weapons. With the help of Satan, they even wanted to conquer the whole world. Even though Nazis were destroyed, their mind control weapons spread out all over the world. More followers of Dragon and Beast started to research and develop mind control weapons and they wanted to control their followers and also used their mind control weapons to abuse and torture God’s people secretly.
1. Mind Control technologies.
Mind control technologies are weapons which use drugs, electronic microchip implants, nanotechnologies, microwaves and /or electromagnetic waves to subvert an individual's sense of control over their own thinking, behavior, emotions or decision making by attacking the brain and nervous system.
2. The development of mind control methods and technologies has a long history.
Nazi researchers used concentration camp inmates to test a cocaine-based "wonder drug" they hoped would enhance the performance of German troops.
(http://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/mind-control-drug )
There is an overwhelming body of evidence that confirms the existence of Mk-ultra, America's Central Intelligence Agency mind control project.
(http://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/proof-mkultra-exists )
Many Researchers, using nanotechnologies have developed implantable electronic chips that establish new nerve connections in the parts of the brain that control movement or even alter emotion and thought.
(http://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/information-about-brain )
In 2002, the Air Force Research Laboratory patented precisely such a technology: Nonleghal weapon which includes (1) a neuro-electromagnetic device which uses microwave transmission of sound into the skull of persons or animals by way of pulse-modulated microwave radiation; and (2) a silent sound device which can transmit sound into the skull of person or animals. NOTE: The sound modulation may be voice or audio subliminal messages. One application of Voice to Skull is use as an electronic scarecrow to frighten birds in the vicinity of airports. Many mind control victims also have claimed to be harassed by Voice to Skull technologies.
(http://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/introduce-v2k-voice-to-skull )
It is possible nowadays to read someone's mind by remotely measuring their brain activity, researchers have shown. This technique can even extract information from individuals that they are unaware of themselves.
( http://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/information-about-mind-reading )
It is sometimes hard for victims to find evidence of microwave or electromagnetic mind control technology. However, some news articles are starting to report the development of government mind control weapons.
( go to replies of this discussion to read more articles introduce electromagnetic/microwave mind control technologies )
Microwave or electromagnetic mind control technology, even can attack you through satellites; or through TV , Mobile transmission Towers
( http://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/satellite-surveillance )
Patents also indicate the existence of mind control technologies.
( http://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/mind-control-patents )
Recently, scientists also found that fungi could control ant's brain, will fungi become new mind control weapons in the future?
http://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/fungi-insect-mind-control
3. Electromagnetic Weapons
We only list few websites here for you easily to read some information about Electromagnetic weapons. More information about Electromagnetic weapons can be searched from the Internet easily.
Light, microwaves, x-rays, and TV and radio transmissions are all kinds of Electromagnetic waves.
http://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/microwave-and-electromagnetic
4. Mind Control News articles
http://www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrolnewsarticles-0-20
5. Scientific Paper of Electromagnetic weapons
US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights
By Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton
As Study of the History of US Intelligence Community Human Rights
Violations and Continuing Research in Electromagnetic Weapons
Completed December 2006
Sonoma State University
Project Censored
Media Freedom Foundation
http://www.earthpulse.com/epulseuploads/articles/MindControlHumanRi...(pdf file)
Electromagnetic Aspect of Mind Control-A Scientific Analysis
by Vlad N. Binhi, General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
http://www.scribd.com/doc/5560955/Electromagnetic-Aspect-of-Mind-Co...
Controlling the Human Mind : The Technologies of Political Control or Tools for Peak Performance By Dr. Nick Begich http://www.earthpulse.com/src/product.asp?productid=212
6. Videos of More information about Mind control weapons
Mind control Video
discovery channel
Electronic Mind Control Pt 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3aZyDiyI7g
Electronic Mind Control Pt 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qh7FEwIbQds
Electronic Mind Control Pt 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nA1__XIYUo
CNN: Electromagnetic Mind Control Weapons (2 of 2)
http://www.youtube.com/v/boZIofptQiw
CNN: Electromagnetic Mind Control Weapons (1 of 2)
http://www.youtube.com/v/lgJ6SpHZir8
Science Channel Admits Microwaves Used in Mind Control
http://www.youtube.com/v/zaPb3R5YTo4
http://peacepink.ning.com/video
7. diagnosis of schizophrenia and Mind control Weapons symptoms
Carole Smith is a member of The College of Psychoanalysts, and an accredited member of the United Kingdom Register of Psychotherapists. She trained at the Institute of Psychotherapy and Social Studies, and currently serves on their Ethics Committee.
http://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/yu-jing-shen-qin-hai-ji-shu-de
Moss David Posner, M.D. is a physician currently in practice in the California Department of Corrections. His article is about how to proof Mind Control Weapons and Directed Energy Weapons are using to torture and harass innocent civilians.
How to Control Americans—thought control mind control, disinformation and other naughty things-concl
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID...
Auditory hallucinations: a comparison between patients and nonpatients
http://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/auditory-hallucinations-a
8. Laws and Supporting letters
Laws against mind control and electromagnetic weapons
http://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/laws-against-criminal-uses-of
A letter from Rep. Jim Guest
http://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/a-letter-from-rep-jim-guest
Lynn A Surgalla Former Vice-president of United States Psychotronics Association has written a letter to the court.
http://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/statements-of-lynn-a-surgalla
9. How can Mind Control Weapons and Electromagnetic weapons torture and harass Human Beings?
We can “see” by our eyes; we can “hear” by our ears; we can “smell” by our nose; we can “feel” by our skin. Sense organs receive many information everyday.
Electromagnetic weapons can directly stimulate our neurons to let us “see” “hear” “smell” or “feel” by our brain. Victims also feel that information is “transferring” to their brain.
I am not talking about the sounds around us, but the radio signal itself. We don't "hear" that signal as sounds or voices around us, but as sounds generated inside our heads by the signal.
They also can stimulate our neurons to cut off the connection between neurons and visual sense system; sense of hearing system; sense of smell system; or sense of feeling system, and let us can not “see’; can not “hear”; can not smell” or even can not “feel” pain.
If the electromagnetic weapon’s frequencies are same with our brainwaves frequencies, and both frequencies creative resonance, the electromagnetic weapons can affect our human activities.
Electromagnetic waves can reach everyone through satellite, Radio, TV or Mobile phone signal towers. (See this website to learn some knowledge of satellite surveillance)
Please go to LAST PAGE OF "Replies to this Discussion" to read NEWEST articles
Tags: abuse, mindcontrol, torture
Permalink Reply by Soleilmavis on May 7, 2012 at 8:06am By Rob Waugh
UPDATED: 09:26 GMT, 14 December 2011

Californian biologist Andrew Hessel says, 'Cells are living computers and DNA is a programming language,' but warns that this could lead to viruses and bacteria used to 'hack' human minds
The field of 'synthetic biology' is in its infancy. We can 'tweak' the genetics of life forms - but billionaire entrepreneur Craig Venter only created 'artificial life' for the first time last year, christening his life form 'Synthia'.
But experts working within the field believe that our expertise is out-accelerating natural evolution by a factor of millions of years - and some warn that synthetic biology could spin out of control.
It could lead, says Andrew Hessel of Singularity University, on Nasa's research campus, to a world where hackers could engineer viruses or bacteria to control human minds.
Hessel believes that genetic engineering is the next frontier of computing.
'This is one of the most powerful technologies in the world,' says Hessel 'Synthetic biology - the writing of life.'
'I advocate that cells are living computers and DNA is a programming language.'
'I want to see life programmed and used to solve global challenges so that humanity can achieve a sustainable relationship within the biosphere,' he says.It's growing fast. It will grow faster than computer technologies.'
He predicts a world where we can 'print' DNA, and even 'decode' it. But he warned, in a speech at technology conference TXM, that viruses and bacteria send chemicals into human brains - and could be used to influence, or even 'control' their host.
A literal virus - injected into a 'host' in the guise of a vaccine, say - could be used to control behaviour.
Hessel warns that we 'may have to learn how to counterattack' against such weapons.

Viruses and bacteria have a chemical relationship with their human hosts - feeding us chemicals. An engineered virus could, in theory, feed us chemicals that influence our behaviour, warns Hessel
Security expert Marc Goodman said, 'Synthetic biology will lead to new forms of bioterrorism,' and said, 'Bio-crime today is akin to computer crime in the early Eighties, Few initially recognised the problem - but it grew exponentially.'
When billionaire entrepreneur Craig Venter 'created life' last year by adding synthetic DNA to a bacteria cell, Professor Julian Savulescu, an Oxford University ethicist, said: 'Venter is creaking open the most profound door in humanity's history, potentially peeking into its destiny.This could be used in the future to make the most powerful bioweapons imaginable. The challenge is to eat the fruit without the worm.'
Hessel, however, is generally optimistic about the future of synthetic biology.
The scientist - who had a vasectomy because he 'never trusted the process' of natural reproduction, says, 'We are going to make synthetic genomes - human genomes. It will make cloning look organic. It will make human reproduction look quaint.'
Computer World blogger Darlene Storm says, 'I know people who can't even keep their computers protected, updated and patched - I wonder if they would be more security minded when the hacking could be lethal?
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2073936/Could-hacker...
Permalink Reply by Soleilmavis on May 9, 2012 at 3:02pm Press Release
1 March 2012
http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/news/ethics-body-seeks-views-new-w...
The Nuffield Council on Bioethics today launched a consultation on the ethics of new types of technologies and devices that ‘intervene’ in the brain, such as brain-computer interfaces, deep brain stimulation, and neural stem cell therapy.
These technologies are often being developed for use in the treatment of conditions including Parkinson’s disease, depression and stroke and it is thought they could bring significant medical benefits, especially for those who are severely affected by neurological disease or have a severe brain injury.
Outside of the health context, they could also be used in various military applications, for example to develop weapons or vehicles that are controlled remotely by brain signals. And there are commercial possibilities in the gaming industry, for example, the development of computer games that are controlled by people’s thoughts.
“Intervening in the brain has always raised both hopes and fears in equal measure” said Thomas Baldwin, Chair of the Council’s study and Professor of Philosophy at the University of York. “Hopes of curing terrible diseases, and fears about the consequences of trying to enhance human capability beyond what is normally possible. These challenge us to think carefully about fundamental questions to do with the brain: what makes us human, what makes us an individual, and how and why do we think and behave in the way we do.”
Clearly, some of these technologies have great potential. “Imagine a person who is disabled and cannot speak being able to move independently through a thought-controlled wheelchair or communicate via a computer voice”, said Professor Baldwin. On the other hand, concerns have been raised about safety of some of the techniques that are currently in development. “The impact on a person and on their mind has to be considered, for example, are there risks of unwanted changes in mood, behaviour or personality being introduced into the brain?”
There is also uncertainty over whether the techniques will be as effective in treating disease or aiding rehabilitation from brain injury as some claim they will be. Professor Baldwin said, “Many of these technologies are in the early stages of research, and patients who have high expectations of recovery or rehabilitation may sometimes be left disappointed and frustrated if the treatment doesn’t live up to expectations”.
The development of these technologies for use in warfare may be more troubling for some. “For example if brain-computer interfaces are used to control military aircraft or weapons from far away, who takes ultimate responsibility for the actions? Could this be blurring the line between man and machine?” said Professor Baldwin.
The Nuffield Council inquiry is focussing on technologies that intervene directly in the brain, often through the use of a device, or involving brain implants. The consultation runs until 23 April and the Council would like to hear the views of a wide range of people, including those who have used or are hoping to use these technologies, those involved in development or supply, researchers, academics, patients, medical professionals, regulators, policy makers and others. Responses to the consultation will be carefully considered, and a report setting out the Council’s findings is expected to be published in 2013.
BCI’s measure and analyse a person’s brain signals and converts it into an output such as movement. For example, a paralysed person could use a BCI to operate a wheelchair, or someone who has extreme difficulty speaking could use a BCI to communicate via a computer voice. These sorts of applications have been shown to be successful in a few reported cases, but the technology has not yet been developed for regular clinical use and there are questions over whether these technologies are reliable enough for use in everyday life.
Military applications, such as remote control of vehicles and machinery are not yet in wide use but are being researched and tested, and some commercial BCI developments are already on the market. Gamers can buy a wireless headset that aims to replace a joystick by controlling game play through brain signals.
The use of BCI’s will sometimes require surgery to implant electrodes into a person’s brain, although the most successful current developments are those that detect brain signals from the scalp, so they are less invasive.
Neurostimulation
Different regions of the brain are known to be linked to areas of perception, e.g. pain, sound, vision. Neurostimulation involves the application of an electric or magnetic stimulus to nerves to alter brain activity in a specific area.
The two best-known types are transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), which is usually applied through a hand-held or chair-bound device and is non-invasive, and deep brain stimulation (DBS) which requires brain surgery to place an electrode in the brain and wires under the skin.
TMS is in clinical use and it is currently used mainly to treat depression, although research is underway on possible applications for conditions including obsessive compulsive disorder, Alzheimer’s disease, and pain disorders such as migraine. It has been shown to have some potential for improving memory and learning and research is underway on non-medical enhancement uses e.g. for education.
DBS is already used in treatment of Parkinson’s disease, obsessive-compulsive disorders and movement disorders such as dystonia (which causes tremors). Research is underway on possible benefits for patients with epilepsy, stroke, Tourette’s syndrome and severe pain. Possible complications of DBS are thought to include: stroke, confusion, speech disorders, visual problems and possible damage to the brain tissue surrounding the implant, infection, seizure, depression and the risks associated with general anaesthetic.
Neural stem cell therapy
Researchers are developing neural stem cells that could be used in treating conditions which involve the loss of nerve cells in the brain, for example Alzheimer’s disease, stroke or Huntingdon’s disease. The stem cells are injected into the brain under general anaesthetic.
In stroke, nerve cells can be lost in a particular brain region, leading to a reduced ability of the function associated with that region, e.g. moving the left hand side of the body. Neural stem cell therapy is thought be able to benefit people with these conditions and there is considerable interest and investment in this area of research, both privately and publicly. Small scale preliminary human trials are underway but the treatment is not yet routinely available in the UK.
Neural stem cell therapies are less well understood than other types of brain surgery and there are some concerns associated with its use – e.g. a risk of tumours forming and the possibility of unwanted changes being introduced into the brain – for example in mood, behaviour and ability.
Permalink Reply by Soleilmavis on Saturday “SHADOW OF THE MONARCH” — AN EXPLORATION INTO THE DEEPEST RECESSES OF THE MIND
Upcoming Film to Show Power of Mind Control; “Entertainment with a Warning, says John Luksetich, Writer, Director
Long Beach 5/19/2012 12:51 上午 GMT (TransWorldNews)
http://www.transworldnews.com/1079542/c2/shadow-of-the-monarch-an-e...
John Luksetich, writer and co-director of “Shadow of the Monarch,” a major film now in pre-production by Go Nuts Films, admits that during the filming he is constantly “looking over his shoulder.” Monarch, he says, tackles the forbidden, foreboding subject of mind control, something which is being given more press during these days due to world turmoil. According to Luksetich, Adolph Hitler was one of the first dictators to investigate mind control and practiced it to an extent. “An elementary form of mind control is repeating a message time and time again until people believe it,” and this is what Hitler did. “However,” says Luksetich, “he also had scientists delving into more sophisticated forms of mind control, and there are many who believe investigation of this sort is being conducted today in several countries, including the US.”
He points to the growing abundance of transmission towers cropping up in all regions, seemingly for the benefit of wireless communications, such as cell phones. “Many believe that these towers are for the use of mind control techniques, since they far exceed the number necessary to communicate voice and data,” says Luksetich. “Ted Bundy, the 'Son of Sam' l killer David Berkowitz, Oswald, Timothy McVeigh, the Columbine shooters, Sirhan Sirhan, and even those connected with the 9/11 disaster” are thought to have been programmed. “I only hope that “Shadow of the Monarch” gets audiences to think about mind control. While space is thought to be the “final frontier,” the mind has many dimensions that have yet to be explored. And, just as space exploration is being conducted by several countries, so is investigation into the crevices of the mind,” concludes Luksetich.
About Go Nuts Films
Go Nuts Films and Dreyluca Productions' mission is to make movies... Period end of story... Movies we would enjoy ourselves. Films that root for the underdog in all of us and leave us feeling better in some way for having seen them... Films that give us a little break from our hectic, busy lives. Go Nuts Films is a company where we try to find each others' strengths, instead of picking on each other's weaknesses. For more information on “Shadow of the Monarch” go to: http://www.shadowofthemonarch.com
Permalink Reply by Soleilmavis on Saturday
AtlantiTeo commented on AtlantiTeo's blog post Adjournment McMailTeam 02/12/2010 (copy and backup in peacepink)
PETER LEVETT posted a discussion
© 2012 Created by Soleilmavis.
Powered by
.