peacepink

Worldwide Campaign to stop the Abuse and Torture of Mind Control/DEWs

After a long time hard working, we have already bring awareness of mind control abuse and torture to many people, including some lawyers.
Here are some lawyers who know about Mind Control Abuse and Torture.
If you know more other lawyers who know about Mind Control Abuse and Torture, please add their name to this list by "reply" .

USA

(1)  Gordon P. Erspamer
 Senior Counsel,
 Morrison & Foerster LLP,
 San Francisco, California

Vietnam Veterans of America, et al. v. Central Intelligence Agency, et al.

 Case No. CV-09-0037-CW, U.S.D.C. (N.D. Cal. 2009)

http://edgewoodtestvets.org/

Attached is a YouTube video of Gordon Erspamer, attorney in San Francisco, who is representing veterans who have found implants. He is currently in the very difficult discovery process with the CIA and US Army regarding the program of implanting veterans and other non-consensual experimentation. He claims in this news interview that he believes these programs are on-going today.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twgKMFoRJWw&feature=channel

 

He has also been interviewed on Coast to Coast. Here is an article that was written entitled, "Meet Gordon Erspamer, VA's Worst Nightmare"

http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/meet_gordon_erspamer_vas_worst_nightmare_in_ptsd_benefits_case/

he can be reached at:
Morrison and Foerster
425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2482


(2) Jonathan O. Wilson
Attorney at Law
Wilson Law Center LLC
PO Box 1102, Morrison, CO 80465
720-219-8366
Fax: 303-697-1189
www.WilsonLawCenter.com
Mr. Jonathan O. Wilson represents Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance. He has sent the following request for a congressional hearing and an inquiry on their behalf to Senator Patrick Leahy's office. Senator Leahy is the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

WILSON LAW CENTER LLC
Jonathan O. Wilson, Attorney at Law
P.O. Box 1102
Morrison, Colorado 80465
(720) 219-8366
Fax: (303) 697-1189
Jon.wilson.law@...
www.WilsonLawCenter.com

March 31, 2008
Sen. Patrick Leahy
433 Russell Senate Office Bldg
United States Senate,
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator:

I represent Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance, an organization with several hundred members around the country and internationally who have reason to believe they are targeted with various non-lethal weapons. These targeted individuals suffer physical and psychological symptoms as a result of the remote manipulation. We seek your office's assistance in initiating hearings and a fact-finding congressional inquiry into the government agencies and/or private companies that are targeting citizens. Many citizens are desperate to be freed from the disturbing, intrusive and oppressive targeting.

Evidence supports the conclusion that weapons exist that could be used against individuals, based on U.S. Patent and Trademark Office filings, public releases by agencies, and other technologies that indicate the level of technological sophistication. The weapons are believed to be based on electromagnetism, microwaves, sonic waves, lasers and other types of directed energy, and were characterized as "psychotronic" in Rep. Dennis Kucinich's draft of House Resolution 2977, the Space Preservation Act of 2001. Furthermore, it is undeniable that government agencies have tested citizens without permission in the past; for example, the CIA's human experimentation discussed in Orlikow v. U.S., 682 F.Supp. 77 (D.D.C. 1988), secretly administered lysergic acid diethylamide discussed in United States v. Stanley, 483 U.S. 669 (1987), and military chemical experimentation as discussed in Congressional Committee Report 103-97, 103d Congress, 2d Session, S. Prt. 103-97 (Dec. 8, 1994). Lastly, the sheer numbers of people complaining of being targeted, including people with post-graduate degrees and a lifetime of achievements, and the similarities in symptoms tend to outweigh a dismissive response based on charges of anecdotal evidence or group paranoia.

Several plaintiffs or groups of plaintiffs have filed suits in the past levying similar charges of directed weaponry, but, to my knowledge, all have been dismissed due to immunity and state secret defenses, and the lack of evidence of a direct link to agencies or companies. It is difficult to legally prove targeting by psychotronic weapons when the perpetrators operate from remote, unseen locations and therefore the targeting can be dismissed as delusional. Given the wide scope of alleged targeting, there is a certain risk of sounding too conspiratorial, however, common denominators such as physical symptoms and medical reports, surveillance scenarios, harassment techniques, and more can be readily established.

Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance will gladly provide your office, and any legislator and investigator, reports from targeted individuals documenting instances of targeting, medical documentation, and recordings. This firm will provide research and investigation results upon request as well. We will diligently work with anyone willing to help. Please carefully consider convening hearings and an inquiry and collaborating with other legislators in an effort to uncover and stop this inhumane practice.

Very truly yours,
Jonathan Wilson
Attorney for Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance

The response of the letter
Derrick Robinson Wrote:

The Senate Judiciary office has informed us that we just need a letter from at least one senator requesting a congressional hearing to begin this process. What I would recommend now is that we follow-up this letter from our lawyer with in-person visits to our local Senate offices with requests for a hearing. We should carry this letter with us, along with Rep. Jim Guest's letter and other documentation. And follow-up further after this with phone calls.

I will also write a letter to which I'd like to attach the signatures of as many TI's as possible grouped by state, so each senator can easily see who are his/her constituents. All this will also be a topic for the Saturday night podcast.


(3) JUSTICE WILSON
ROYAL JONES LAW FIRM
1522 W. Warm Springs Rd
Henderson, Nevada 89014
Telephone: 702-471-6777
Fax: 702-531-6777

 

(4) Suggestions from Mr. Bob who have good knowledge on COINTELPRO

(1) the necessary evidence for bringing a lawsuit with Universal Jurisdiction is to pursue a winning legal strategy that begins with the reopening of a COINTELPRO investigation and
(2) the appointment of an independent special counsel with subpoena powers for obtaining classified government documents that show a specific harm to a specific person by a specific federal agent.

USA Bill 1026 COINTELPRO
http://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/usa-bill-hres1026-cointelpro
Instructions for preparing a COINTELPRO statement
http://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/instructions-for-preparing-a

 

(5) Joan Farr Heffington, C.E.O.
Association for Honest Attorneys
7145 Blueberry Lane, Derby, Kansas 67037
Ph: 316.788.0901
316.788.7990
www.assocforhonestattys.com

We have read some of the dialog going on between TIs and legal counsel concerning the Bioethics Commission and wanted to offer our opinion. If this email does not reach all the TIs on your list, please forward...

From all indications, this commission is only to give the appearance that they are doing something about the illegal surveillance/ targeting of innocent people. Our research and substantial evidence shows that the targeting of innocent people (in any form, whether it's by microwave surveillance/microchips/steroid cocktail mix IVs in the hospital) is the result
of National Security Letters (NSLs) that were legalized under the Patriot Act in 2001. Anyone with connections to a Washington insider or your state governor/attorney general can have one issued against a person at any time for any reason. We have evidence to show that NSLs were delivered to hospitals three times in 2007 in the Wichita, Kansas area by CIA  operatives/Blackwater contractors stationed at McConnell Air Force Base (read Case # 3 on our website under "Supporting Documents" - one woman was killed in the hospital using the steroid cocktail mix I.V.) NSLs are also delivered to banks if they want to get into your bank account, and this also flags employers not to hire you. Our research shows that anyone who fights the system in any way has an NSL against them. When a 22-year old boy working out at McConnell was targeted with H1N1 in Oct. 2009, we pushed for a Congressional inquiry and a false lawsuit was brought against me (personally) by our state attorney general for practicing law without a license. They do not want us to keep showing people how to file their own lawsuits because they know that numerous pro se suits are the only thing that works - they overload the system. You can talk til you're blue in the face, but a lawsuit is a written
record that forces them to respond (if they don't, you win by default judgment). A guide is on our website under "How to File a Federal Suit" with TI claims similar to Case # 3. You can take it all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court by mail in three easy steps. Your best evidence is an affidavit from another TI who agrees with what happened to you, because it also happened to them. We have helped people with cases in the past and attached these as evidence, and this keeps the court from dismissing it as a frivolous suit. Don't let anyone tell you this is not good evidence - it is the BEST.

If what we are telling you is wrong, they wouldn't be trying so hard to put us out of business. But a top priority right now is to pressure your Congressmen/Senators to let the Patriot Act (or relevant portions) expire on May 27. Then they can no longer issue National Security Letters against innocent people. We also need a law in place, and that is why a Congressional inquiry is needed. If enough lawsuits are threatened, this can force them to address the issue so it is covered by mainstream media, as it should be...
"The answer to world peace is to eliminate arrogance."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Letter
USA PATRIOT Act
Once passed in 2001, section 505 of the USA PATRIOT Act greatly expanded the use of the NSL, allowing their use in scrutiny of US residents, visitors, or US citizens who are not suspects in any criminal investigation. It also granted the privilege to other federal agencies, presumably to allow the department of Homeland Security the same ability to use NSLs. In January 2007 the New York Times reported that both the Pentagon and the CIA have been issuing National Security Letters.[6] The USA PATRIOT Act reauthorization statutes passed during the 109th Congress added specific penalties for non-compliance or disclosure.



Canada

 

Europe


(1) Free Lawyers

http://www.reprieve.org/home.htm

http://www.reprieve.org.uk/ 

Reprieve is possible to help victims, But writing emails to them will not receive replies, So victims have to visit their offices and talk to them individually.

 

(3) Some suggestions from France lawyerss

Summary report of Mr. Rudy (France) meeting with the lawyers in Paris

Only 3 lawyers turned up, the other 3 were held up at their offices at the last moment and briefly chatted with us on the phone.

1. They all know about the existence of various tecnological means which violate the fundamental human rights of innocent people , they know the existence of non lethal weapons and of highly sophisticated psychological pressures.

2. They do not have the slightest doubt about some governments' participation in influencing or even destroying the free will of some people.

3. They know that the exposure of such practices usually provokes sniggering and those who dare to complain are either made fun of or accused of paranoia.
Paranoia , of course, does exist and as it is characterized by an excessive mistrust of other people's acts or an excessive mistrust of power, it affects every social relationship and makes it possible to justify exclusion .

4. Utmost rigour and precision are therefore required when exposing the attacks on the victims' integrity, privacy and freedom of thought by invisible means. .
It is only by building up impeccable fact-files supported by official reports and scientific studies that public opinion worldwide can be sensitized and made aware of the problem.
It is only under these conditions of rigour and precision that the 3 lawyers present will agree to put the case for the defence.

The 3 lawyers all agreed on the following points:
Our difficulty is that we have practically no legal evidence of the attacks, so we have to make do with:
a) statistics
b) similarities in symptoms and experiences
c) similarities of torture cases
d) existence of weapons'patents
e) existence of the technology patents for the use of V2K
f) complicity of a number of psychiatrists worldwide
G) the highly probable involvement of many governments ( two lawyers referred to the example of helicopters and said that not many people can afford to maintain aircrafts. Flights are logged and the airspace they are in is recorded).
September 13, 2008
add 1 point: the 3 lawyers think that our first help should come from the parliamentarians, because they are the ones who make the laws.

 

Some lawyers suggestions on how to file a court case :
http://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/some-suggestions-on-how-to

 

Some lawsuits filed by Soleilmavis
http://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/some-lawsuits-filed-by

Tags: lawyer

Views: 2056

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Lawyer Mario Di Norcia's testimony
Translated from Italian by Rudy Andria with the permission of the author.
http://www.fedame.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=6893

My name is Mario di Norcia. I am a lawyer from Fondi in the province of Latina in Italy. I am a regular member of the Bar of this province. I have been persecuted for about 8 years now by those whom I assume to be the Italian secret services or some government organisations.

One evening in Spring 2002 I had the "sensation" of being followed while I was going back home. Such a sensation or rather, such a thought, I have understood later, has been telepathically inserted into my mind. Thinking it over, I have understood that some cars were, as a matter of fact, following me. As it was in the evening and dark, in the city traffic, it was practically impossible to notice anything whatsoever.

Nevertheless, the following days I noticed people who had strange behaviours with repetitive gestures. Such gestures could seem normal in appearance, but as they were continuously repeated, they gave me to understand that the purpose of these individuals' presence was to let me know I was being stalked. I had to deal with different people all the time, sometimes they were more or less conspicuously disguised to intentionally let me understand they were agents or such like.

The Interdepartmental Research Center
European Center for Law, Science and Technologies (ECLT)
University of Pavda,

European Center for Law, Science and Technologies (ECLT)
Neuro and law
http://www.unipv-lawtech.eu/lang1/neuro__law.html

Amedeo Santosuosso, President

amedeo.santosuosso@unipv.it;

Carlo Alberto Redi, Director

carloalberto.redi@unipv.it;

Silvia Ggaragna, Director

silvia.garagna@unipv.it;

Barbara Bottalico  Editor

enlsc@unipv.it ; barbara.bottalico@unipv-lawtech.eu;

 

Center for Neuroscience & Society, University of Pennsylvania

Faculty

 

Geoffrey K. Aguirre

Assistant Professor of Neurology

aguirreg@mail.med.upenn.edu;

Arthur L. Caplan

Emanuel and Robert Hart Professor of Bioethics

caplan@mail.med.upenn.edu;

Anjan Chatterjee

Professor of Neurology

anjan@neuroethics.upenn.edu;

Martha J. Farah

Walter H. Annenberg Professor of Natural Sciences

mfarah@neuroethics.upenn.edu;

Kenneth R. Foster

Professor of Bioengineering and Associate Professor of Electrical and Systems Engineering

kfoster@seas.upenn.edu;

Geoff Goodwin

Assistant Professor of Psychology

ggoodwin@psych.upenn.edu;  

Jason Karlawish

Associate Professor of Medicine and Medical Ethics

jason.karlawish@uphs.upenn.edu;

Daniel Langleben

Associate Professor of Psychiatry

langlebe@mail.med.upenn.edu;

A. Thomas McLellan

Professor of Psychology in Psychiatry

tmclellan@tresearch.org;

Jonathan D. Moreno

David and Lyn Silfen University Professor and

Professor of Biomedical Ethics and History and Sociology of Science

morenojd@mail.med.upenn.edu;

Stephen J. Morse

Ferdinand Wakeman Hubbell Professor of Law;

Professor of Psychology and Law in Psychiatry

smorse@neuroethics.upenn.edu;

Adrian Raine

Richard Perry

University Professor, Departments of Criminology, Psychiatry, and Psychology

araine@sas.upenn.edu;

Anthony Rostain

Professor of Psychiatry at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

rostain@mail.med.upenn.edu;

Susan E. Rushing

Assistant Professor of Psychiatry

Susan.Rushing@uphs.upenn.edu;

Robert L. Sadoff

Clinical Professor of Forensic Psychiatry and Director, Forensic Psychiatry Fellowship Program at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine.

sadoffbobsadoff@aol.com;

Susan L. Schneider

Assistant Professor of Philosophy

sls@sas.upenn.edu;

John Tresch

Assistant Professor of History and Sociology of Science

jtresch@sas.upenn.edu;

Amy Wax

Robert Mundheim Professor of Law

awax@law.upenn.edu;

 

enlsc@unipv.it; barbara.bottalico@unipv-lawtech.eu; aguirreg@mail.med.upenn.edu; caplan@mail.med.upenn.edu; anjan@neuroethics.upenn.edu; mfarah@neuroethics.upenn.edu;

amedeo.santosuosso@unipv.it; carloalberto.redi@unipv.it; silvia.garagna@unipv.it; enlsc@unipv.it; barbara.bottalico@unipv-lawtech.eu; kfoster@seas.upenn.edu; ggoodwin@psych.upenn.edu; jason.karlawish@uphs.upenn.edu; langlebe@mail.med.upenn.edu; tmclellan@tresearch.org; morenojd@mail.med.upenn.edu; smorse@neuroethics.upenn.edu;  araine@sas.upenn.edu;  rostain@mail.med.upenn.edu;  Susan.Rushing@uphs.upenn.edu;  sadoffbobsadoff@aol.com;  sls@sas.upenn.edu;  jtresch@sas.upenn.edu;  awax@law.upenn.edu; 
I'm UK, pretty much tried every journalist, human rights org and solicitor in UK and a lot further afield...no success! anybody on here got special contacts i could try?

Hi

Been trying to find some sort of 'help' in the UK, for many years, with no success. Found your address and hope you dnt mind me contacting you on the off chance that you might be able to help/ suggest something. My story is here, but pls email me back if you would like a Word Doc/ foramtted more readable version! Not making attachment as that usually makes the email get labelled as spam/ virus or soemthing...

Pls forgive my curtness, just so little energy left these days...

This is what is done to political dissidents in the UK these days...

http://jakemaverick.blogspot.com/
http://gangstalkingworld.com/Media/2010/05/the-psychiatric-reprisal/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xbp6umQT58A&feature=player_embedded
http://www.lesdove.blogspot.com/2009/02/torture-report.html

People do ask for me to try and summarise it down a bit, but as i say virtually no energy left. Did have a go in an email the other day though,

"I struggle to do anything else with it though. Even typing abit difficult with how my wrists/ hand is atthe moment. Already edited about sixty pages out of it, and it was only ever the second half of the story... several years (probably about 5) of being targetted before that blog started...cars driven at me in the street, randomly punched in the head by starngers in the street, nearly pushed under a bus once but i know who did that....camera pointed through my bedroom window 24/7 for abt ayear and forced to pay for the privelege, black listed for jobs, poisoned watyer supply, no central heating, rats running about the place, half starved through lack of food....never got any 'justification' for that, I do know how it sounds! If you haven't yet try reading some of the gangstalking TI sites...

If he/ she needs a summary of the blog, I will try....lil point though, been banging my head against a wall for ten years now! Just to be clear, that was a metaphor! ;-)

I was already homeless. They took that away from me and had already effectively become a refugee in my own country. as wellas my bank account/ any source of income.... Then i was visciously beaten up and
abducted/ kidnapped. Black trousers and white shirts, but i suspect they may have been employed as pigyobs or browncoats. Yanked very hard on my testicles repeaedtly. Still got a lot of pain in the left one,
'never hung right' since...twisted possibly fractured my wrists when my arms were twisted behind my back and manacled/ handcuffed...the elft wrsit still feels weak, soemtimes alil bit pain/stiff...punched
me repeatedly in lower back and back of head, grit in my eyes, grit down my throat, triggering a somewhat severe asthma attack, really did think i was being suffocated, knee in my back then to making it even
harder to breathe...it was all filmed on camera...then abducted, bounced abt in a back of van until semi concious. then yanked out, beaten up and stripped naked forced into guantanamo jump suit....i thought i was abt to be sent overseas! that probably sounds melodramatic, but i swear that is what happened! never said so much as a word to me

locked up for several months. not sure exactly how long. during which time randomly violently assaulted. anally raped once i beleive. gang raped reapeatedly on numerous occasions, i.e. violently/ sexually
asaulted and injected with unknown substances. also forced to swallow things as well. substances unknown. it was all filmed on camera...eithe rone's mounted on the walls or via mobile phone.

their sole justification for it? simply the accusation of 'believeing the govt is evil, isn't it?' they never actually bothered to ask me what i thought of the govt. refused to discuss 'politics' with me at any time....i did initially try to engage them in 'debate'/ reason....severe memory problems with what else went on. was the threat of 'electric shock' treatment but i have no memory of them actually implementing that. dnt think they did, but cnt be sure...think memory loss/ brain damage down to chemical abuse, best i can gather...

initial stint was two weeks, or so they say...then i tried compalining to IPCC again so yobois in white shirts and black trousers kicke dthe door in again, seriosuly kicke dthe shit out of me agn dislocating my back and then same treatment for a couple of more months or there abts....

for the last four years chronic pain in bowels/ groin, lower stomach (kidneys/ liver?), lower back, constant headache for over four years now, different parts of my head varying in intensity. blurred vison occasionally, i suspect some kind of brain damage possible tumour. had trouble walking for a couple of weeks at end of 2006/7 i think (from memory, very hazy memory now) from the dislocatedc back, i  presume.
bleeding out of backside for a long time/ total loss of control of bowel movements on several occasions, but all taht seems to have stopped now. scars around my groin, but faded a hell of alot since.

after released, randomly harassed/ summoned/ interrogated for over a year....
to this day stillnot 'allowed' bank account/ access to money/ benefits in any form....refugee in my own country, parents collaborated with them and have been forced effetively to 'live' survive as their
prisoner for coming upfive years now...

cnt even confirm whether or not any of them were real g-men!

in reference to what your man says about the 'secret rules' on secret websites that unilaterally vary when ever they like stuff/ codes of conduct etc, he/ she really has no idea does he/ she? NOT possible to
get access to such things and every time you try to engage these 'people' in conversation they just lie to your face/ ignore you/ randomly violently or sexually assault you! only way to get a name out of one is to kill one in self defence....what one has to do to one to get to see some ID, admit tehy're g-men, see the warrant for that information or access to these 'secret rules' is way beyond my powers of deduction!

After a year or so I did finally get a SIGNED letter from the GMC, stating they were going to ignore my 'legal proceedings against them' as none of the people attacked me were on the 'medical reigister'.
apparently everybody employed by the NHS (recpetionists, managers, electricians etc.) are automatically put on the medical register without their knowledge or consnet, apparently....so i can only presuem that tehir investigations, presuming they did any, had concluded that they weren't specifically employed by the govt dept. known as the NHS.....but i still presume they were employed as g-men of soem sort, considering they operated in broad daylight, the way the yob mutherfrackers behave and access to the kind of equipment/ weapons and facilities that they did have access to....

never gonna be able to 'prove' any of it though....still refusing to confirm or deny what they did with tthe video recordings....stopped asking now, got fed up with being attacked for it! all i can do is to continue with my campaign, they will ahve to torture me agn to even make me talk to them now....best i can hope for it a Raoul Moat ending.....the guy also had TI written all over him, I wd be decking my place out with cameras to if i had one/ had the resources....but they neutralised me long ago! tried to kill myself several times 2006/7, but turns out i just didn't have stones for it....total coward...

as for the blog, really best i can do now. no energy to go through it all agn....at the time i just needed to get down as much as i cd remember/ much detail as possible whilst i still rembered it! cnt really make it any shorter....this has been going on for over ten years now! to my eternal shame, i never once lifted o much as a finger to defend myself! yet! it's certainly not going to me going 'pre-emptive' on them, whoever they are....

everything i can possibly think of to do has already been done. wdn't even give me access to small claims court- so all i cd try to do was publicise! at least some influential peeps have read it, i noted the liks of David Mitchell and that senior liberal democrat blatantly ripping off my material! did have a lil bit support initially from contacts i used to have in Nick Clegg's offics. His people just ignore me to now since he became deputy prime minister....

did just make msm once though, ;-)

Post 25
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/newsnight/fromthewebteam/2010/05/wednesd...

all i want is to be let out of prison now, surely i been punished enough already for what i allegedly believed?

" In reality it isn’t against the law (should be) to drug somebody against their will. It is against the law to brutally attack them or physically harm them. But it’s there definition of abuse and harm and they can do whatever they want!"

as i said in blog, paraphrasing criminal and illegal are not synonymous, never have been anywhere as far as i can tell! against the law? what abt putting on a disguise, creeping up behind someone and shooting them repeatedly in the head? murdering the man with the table leg? breaking in and murdering the guy whilst shagging his g/f? dropping bombs on children? or any of these crimes illegal? where can i get access to these secret laws and have them independly verified? locking up political dissidents and torturing them without trial? human rights act? i mean, HELLO....

of course, talking like this was presumably why they targette dme for it....they must have been spying on me/ reading my emails for quite some time! look up those RIPA laws!!!

does that count as a 'summary', pls let me know your thoughts!
JM"
Beyond desperate here, hope you can help!

Permanent Injunction to Stop Directed Energy Experiments on Americans

http://www.sueeasy.com/class_action_detail.php?case_id=350

Information re OS/EH-related lawsuits

This was sent by attorney Keith Labella:

 

I have some preliminary thoughts about lawsuits regarding OS/EH: 

 

Firstly, there are two fundamentally different lawsuits that can apply. One type would be a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit (or a Freedom of Information Law lawsuit at the state agency

level). The second type would be a suit for money damages and/or an injunction. 

 

A FOIA suit is much easier. You request information from the agency under the applicable FOIA law and then appeal the decision (because you will not get the responsive documents you requested; there is obviously a high level of secrecy and control of information flow here).

 

The FOIA cases are handled without discovery or trial. They are procedurally akin to summary judgment motions with affidavits and legal briefs. There is generally a short oral argument.

 

The law is complex in this area. Expect to read dozens of cases, and to closely analyze the statute and related administrative law. For the average college educated person without a legal background, this can be a lot of learning and work. I suggest that anyone willing to put the time in go to their local courthouse and requisition FOIA (or related state freedom of information cases) at the clerks office.

 

Also, find out where you can access a law library.

 

Many graduates will have access to physical and/or electronic legal research at their colleges which can be accessed by joining the Alumni Association (paying a fee). 

 

For those requesting federal agency records the DOJ FOIA Reference website is very helpful See:

http://www.justice.gov/oip/04_7.html

 

Because of the paucity of information related to proving who/what/when/where/how, or, in legal terms, malicious conduct by a person or group, acting in concert that legally caused the harm complained of, I do not suggest a monetary lawsuit at this time. Neither victims' advocacy groups nor the government are revealing what they know, and, the type of investigative legwork required to make out a conspiracy case is well beyond the financial means of targets. 

 

I hope this email will be helpful to the many victims seeking justice. Circulate it and re-print it on your site at your discretion. As you know, I am currently suing the FBI, DOJ and Office of Justice Programs under the FOIA for more information relating to the crime of gang stalking.

 

Keith 

Great thread     Some real good info compiled here

   I am getting a sense we are looking at the wrong category of technology because in reading the Federal Regulations as they pertain to the standards the BioEthics Commission is adhering to, what is EXEMPT from the Common Rule could be factors in what we are experiencing

§46.101 To what does this policy apply?
 (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section,

(2) Research involving the use of educational tests (cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement), survey procedures, interview procedures or observation of public behavior, unless

 

 

Surveying procedures and observation of public behavior are considered EXEMPT  And a waiver can be applied if they promise (as they cross their fingers behind their backs) to follow the waiver guidelines if they need to use those purposes that might include human subjects, they have a loophole that allows them to step around informed consent.

 Now that surveying procedures are now carried out by satellites, as surveying proceduces is the procedures of mapping and measuring the geophysical of Earth which is also observation of the earth changes which utilize instruments of amplification (a gain)   Basically they have been able to bring together 2 process's mapping and measuring, as a whole, and observing all physical behavior on the surface of the Earth be it animal, vegetable or mineral.

   V2K is an aspect that we have the least capability to establish and prove

  We might be human subjects that they are using in which to resolve biosignatures so that their tracking and recognition programs can work in real time of science and technology

This technology  is not regarded as weapons but instead the advancement of science, is an area they refer

to as BIOMETRICS which has been advancing into the ability to resolve BIOSIGNATURES  Chemical process's within our bodies would also be a biosignature.    And I would guess this is probably something that would

pertain to V2K as thoughts can be received and sent also by manipulation of the vocal tract.

  Just maybe we are looking at this from the wrong angle  as it pertains to a lawsuit.   Just something to consider

 

Among the different biometric techniques, facial recognition may not be the most reliable and efficient. However, one key advantage is that it does not require aid (or consent) from the test subject.  The most specific and reliable of biometric data are obtained from DNA sequencing

Biometrics systems—which once cost tens of thousands of dollars to install—were originally used only by large corporations and the government.
In addition, Microsoft announced that it would support biometric technology in future versions of Windows, making it easier to build Internet and network servers that can accept the biometric identifications. Before long, biometric scanning devices may be bundled into every new PC sold.

On a global scale, biometric data interchange and interoperability standards are at present fragmented into different measurement and input format schemes. The Common Biometric Exchange File Format (CBEFF), in development by the International Biometric Industry Association (IBIA), seeks to integrate such measurement schemes to enhance reliability and use of biometric data. Other integration efforts include the Biometric Application Programming Interface (BioAPI) specification program used by the United States Department of Defense. The Department of Defense has also established a Biometrics Management Office (BMO). 


Once the scanner reads the user's physiological information, the computer begins analyzing it. "The system reads the physical or behavioral characteristic, looks for telltale minutiae, and applies an algorithm that uniquely expresses those minutiae as a very large alphanumeric key," Bill Orr explained in the ABA Banking Journal. "This sample key then goes to a repository where it is compared with a key (called a template) that was created by the approved user when she enrolled in the system. This in turn generates a score based on how closely the two samples match."

Some experts suggest that the various types of biometric technologies will be combined as needed to fit different user applications. "If you already have a telephone in your hand, the most natural thing in the world is to use voice scanning for identification,"

The tough part of implementing a biometric method isn't choosing between face, fingerprint, and voice pattern recognition but integrating the chosen method with your existing applications

Because even objective features such as weight can change over time, systems of identification that rely on changeable or gross features are not as reliable as biometric systems that measure more stable anatomical and physiological characteristics such as fingerprints, retinal blood vessel patterns, specific skull dimensions; dental and skeletal x-rays, earlobe capillary patterns and hand geometry.

 

The most specific and reliable of biometric data are obtained from DNA sequencing.

More controversial and, at present, less reliable biometric studies seek to enhance quantification of social behaviors, voice characteristics—including language use patterns and accents


Biometrics of the measurement of physical characteristics, such as fingerprints, DNA, or retinal patterns, for use in verifying the identity of  people based on physical or behavioral characteristics, such as fingerprints or voice scans. "Bio" in the name refers to the physiological traits that are measured, while "metrics" refers to the quantitative analysis that provides a positive identification of a unique individual.

 Among the different biometric techniques, facial recognition may not be the most reliable and efficient. However, one key advantage is that it does not require aid (or consent) from the test subject.  The most specific and reliable of biometric data are obtained from DNA sequencing

Many citizens are concerned that their privacy will be invaded.   Their are other fears that it could lead to a “total surveillance society,” with the government and other authorities having the ability to know where you are, and what you are doing, at all times. This is not to be an underestimated concept as history has shown that states have typically abused such access before 

 

 

receiver operating characteristic or relative operating characteristic (ROC) – The ROC plot is a visual characterization of the trade-off between the FAR and the FRR. In general, the matching algorithm performs a decision based on a threshold which determines how close to a template the input needs to be for it to be considered a match. If the threshold is reduced, there will be less false non-matches but more false accepts. Correspondingly, a higher threshold will reduce the FAR but increase the FRR. A common variation is the Detection error trade-off (DET), which is obtained using normal deviate scales on both axes. This more linear graph illuminates the differences for higher performances (rarer errors). 

Biometrics consists of methods for uniquely recognizing humans based upon one or more intrinsic physical or behavioral traits. In computer science, in particular, biometrics is used as a form of identity access management and access control. It is also used to identify individuals in groups that are under surveillance.

Biometric characteristics can be divided in two main classes[citation needed]:

  • Physiological are related to the shape of the body. Examples include, but are not limited to fingerprint, face recognition, DNA, Palm print, hand geometry, iris recognition, which has largely replaced retina, and odour/scent.
  • Behavioral are related to the behavior of a person. Examples include, but are not limited to typing rhythm, gait, and voice. Some researchers[1] have coined the term behaviometrics for this class of biometrics.

Strictly speaking, voice is also a physiological trait because every person has a different vocal tract, but voice recognition is mainly based on the study of the way a person speaks, commonly classified as behavioral.



 http://www.answers.com/topic/biometrics#ixzz1NEBDJ5Qq

 http://www.answers.com/topic/biometrics#ixzz1NE8fzYrS

 

 

the increase in the strength of an electromagnetic, chemical, or acoustic signal effected by an amplifier.

Physics.
  1. The process of increasing the magnitude of a variable quantity, especially the magnitude of voltage, power, or current, without altering any other quality.
  2. The result of such a process.

http://www.answers.com/topic/amplification 

http://www.answers.com/topic/observation
 Observation is usually the first step taken in a scientific investigation.
  1. The act or faculty of observing.
  2. The fact of being observed.
  1. The act of noting and recording something, such as a phenomenon, with instruments.

Considered as a physical process itself, all forms of observation (human or instrumental) involve amplification and are thus thermodynamically irreversible processes, increasing entropy.

The actions or reactions of a person or animal in response to external or internal stimuli.

A stimulus is any phenomenon that directly influences the activity or growth of a living organism. Phenomenon, meaning any observable fact or event, is a broad term and appropriately so, since stimuli can be of so many varieties. Chemicals, heat, light, pressure, and gravity all can serve as stimuli, as indeed can any environmental change.



 

 

The 3 lawyers all agreed on the following points:
Our difficulty is that we have practically no legal evidence of the attacks, so we have to make do with:
a) statistics
b) similarities in symptoms and experiences
c) similarities of torture cases
d) existence of weapons'patents
e) existence of the technology patents for the use    OF BIOMETRICS AND BIOSIGNATURES????

 

Code of Federal Regulations

Code of Federal Regulations

TITLE 45
PUBLIC WELFARE

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

PART 46
PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS

[PDF 215 KB]

* * *

Revised January 15, 2009
Effective July 14, 2009

 
§46.101 To what does this policy apply?
 (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this policy applies to all research involving human subjects conducted, supported or otherwise subject to regulation by any federal department or agency which takes appropriate administrative action to make the policy applicable to such research. This includes research conducted by federal civilian employees or military personnel, except that each department or agency head may adopt such procedural modifications as may be appropriate from an administrative standpoint. It also includes research conducted, supported, or otherwise subject to regulation by the federal government outside the United States.
 (1) Research that is conducted or supported by a federal department or agency, whether or not it is regulated as defined in §46.102(e), must comply with all sections of this policy.
 (2) Research that is neither conducted nor supported by a federal department or agency but is subject to regulation as defined in §46.102(e) must be reviewed and approved, in compliance with §46.101, §46.102, and §46.107 through §46.117 of this policy, by an institutional review board (IRB) that operates in accordance with the pertinent requirements of this policy.
 (b) Unless otherwise required by department or agency heads, research activities in which the only involvement of human subjects will be in one or more of the following categories are exempt from this policy:
 (1) Research conducted in established or commonly accepted educational settings, involving normal educational practices, such as (i) research on regular and special education instructional strategies, or (ii) research on the effectiveness of or the comparison among instructional techniques, curricula, or classroom management methods.
 (2) Research involving the use of educational tests (cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement), survey procedures, interview procedures or observation of public behavior, unless:
(i) information obtained is recorded in such a manner that human subjects can be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects; and (ii) any disclosure of the human subjects' responses outside the research could reasonably place the subjects at risk of criminal or civil liability or be damaging to the subjects' financial standing, employability, or reputation.

MKUltra got moved away out of site out of mind.   One instance does not make a case

One instance does not make  a direct proof     It's a piece and unless we have the capacity to

put the pieces together to form the whole, it is not something that the public can understand that encourges them

to want to participate of wanted to know more.  

  So perhaps we have a need to pick other topics that are more relevant to the health and well being of the population that the population can understand rather than the topics that they have the least ability to understand how the subject is relevant to them

   The population understands the big C of cancer   The wireless technologies, the telecommunications,  the eyes in the skies, the surveying methods of mapping and measuring the surface of the Earth and the living systems that live here, the ability to resolve and watch us all in real time, that is an energy that is harming the populations health and well being.

It can stimulate their sensory pathways evoking chemical potentials in their brains and those chemicals are

a piece of our biosignatures. those chemicals also maintain our body's mental emotional equillbrum states.

The energy is coming at us at millions of cycles per second of a repetitive modulated pulse waveform  So basically we are caught in a vibrational tactile field that stimulates other sensory pathways and is capable of exciting our silent signaling process of chemical electrical snyapses and those pathways are being over stimulated, like our hair follicles of our skin, or the tiny hairs in our ears, but they evoke a chain reaction of a signalling process that it's data get's feed to the main processor of our brains.   As humans, how our brains think and regulate our bodies, that is a silent signalling process that goes on without us being conscious aware of it taking place in our bodies.  It is subconsciously taking place within our bodies.

  What we are consciously aware of is our sensory pathways of touch, taste , smell, odor. visual and auditory

and other tactile sensory modalities     The population is becoming aware of that their sensory pathways are being over stimulated and that their bodies are either in prolonged states of stress or prolonged states of fatigue.

Our chemical (hormones) are not in balance any more and doctors throwing pills at them isn't fixing the problem and the problem is getting more widesprad

The energy is harming our DNA and it is coming in faster than our immune systems can keep up the rate of repair

The population can understand something that they can relate to of the strange symptoms their bodies are experiencing of chemicals either over producing in their bodies or underproducing that has the capacity to lead to chronic diseases of the ultimate DNA harm of the cell death of cancer.     We can feel our sensory pathways are being over stimulated and that we are experiencing stress, fatigue, tingling, ringing noises in the ears, pain, numbness, nausea, dizziness, muscle tightening, etc.   These are conditions we can sense and we are consciously aware of that action taking place. of signaling process's that are not silent and we have awareness of that action.

 The brain doesn't feel pain so how can the population grasp mind control if they cannot sense it's presence taking place, of it's silent signaling process's being evoked??????

 

 


Yan Xu said:

Brice Taylor is a former CIA. She testified in an interview with Ted Gunderson, former FBI senior officer of LA, that she started to work for CIA on mind control experiments in 1985 when she was only 16 years old. That is a direct proof. She gave many names of CIA officers. Name of doctor in LA hospital. Very importantly she gave detailed phenomena of mind control. For instance she said she felt like she had sex with President Reagon. She did not have sex with President Reagon. It was Reagon's wife's neuron signals were recorded into a tape by CIA and those signals were played to her brain when she was half asleep. Me and my colleague can prove we experienced the same experiments in 2008 and 2009

Dr. Annie Yan XU (Lecturer)Tel: (852) 27666572 (O) (852)98501119 email: mfxuyan@inet.polyu.edu.hk

Lawyers in Canada, who may interested to hear electromagnetic mind control victims stories.

http://www.anticelltowerlawyers.com/

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Latest Activity

TI in Florida posted a blog post

Explanation of Delusions, some Religious Cults

Based on some older posts, some people experience what they think are weird delusions like colors peeling off, etc. This is a multi-faceted targeting program, and your tap water has probably been compromised with CIA drugs added, so only drink bottled water, and brush your teeth with bottled water. The notes to the 1992 Akwei vs NSA lawsuit exposed how this program has a network of undercover plumbers that modify the plumbing to allow psychotic or other drugs to be put into the tap water. So…See More
14 minutes ago
David ofTomorrow commented on David ofTomorrow's blog post How to block messages from Governmentalienrobotgod
"Several years that I know of. He has claimed various things over this time to get attention. It has most often included at some point soliciting money.  I personally don't think he is a perp. He, like everyone else, is a TI. But I think he…"
1 hour ago
David ofTomorrow commented on David ofTomorrow's blog post How to block messages from Governmentalienrobotgod
"Well Facebook is where I read it, and it was put out as an official statement by a leading member of ICAACT. The fact that I know these stands by ICAACT pertaining to Gamache should give credibility to the fact that I did read it,  and I did…"
2 hours ago
deca commented on David ofTomorrow's blog post How to block messages from Governmentalienrobotgod
"also all these sort of mass EH law suits spam emails normally end up in my spam folder and I just don`t bother with them how many years has Greg been sending them around  ? obviously if these emails contain false accusation and cause Defamation…"
3 hours ago
deca commented on David ofTomorrow's blog post How to block messages from Governmentalienrobotgod
"I don`t need to contact ICAACT as I am part of ICAACT and yes this statement is true "that they have Nothing to do with Gregs petition" or anything else to do with him ICAACT does not normally use Facebook only a few members of ICAACT…"
3 hours ago
David ofTomorrow commented on David ofTomorrow's blog post How to block messages from Governmentalienrobotgod
"The statement made by ICAACT on Targeted Individuals Facebook page was clear and to the point,  without being derogatory.  They stated that they understood that Greg Gamache was trying to create funds through a petition on behalf of TIs.…"
3 hours ago
David ofTomorrow commented on David ofTomorrow's blog post How to block messages from Governmentalienrobotgod
"Greg the only thing that you are trying to end is your monetary drought."
3 hours ago
deca commented on David ofTomorrow's blog post How to block messages from Governmentalienrobotgod
"Comment by David ofTomorrow 8 hours ago david what Reports ? again if you make a claim or statement like this then you need to provide evidence ,links to such "reports" really getting sick of all the nonsense and gossip hearsay that…"
4 hours ago

Badge

Loading…

© 2014   Created by Soleilmavis.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service