Responses and replies from government and public

[Soleilmavis]

If you get any responses and replies when you write to the government or public, please post here by "reply to this discussion"

 

Mailteam works during the past few years

http://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/mailteam-1

Mailteam members

http://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/mailteam-members

Mailteam Mass Petitions

http://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/mailteam-mass-petitions

 

Lawsuits filed by victims  http://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/lawsuits-of-mind-control

Mind Control technologies
http://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/introduce-mind-control-and

 

Please go to LAST PAGE OF "Replies to this Discussion" to read NEWEST Information

[Soleilmavis]

From: "CRCL"
To: "Soleilmavis"

To Whom It May Concern:

Thank you for contacting the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL). Under 6 U.S.C. § 345 and 42 U.S.C. § 2000ee-1, CRCL is responsible for reviewing and assessing information concerning abuses of civil rights, civil liberties, and profiling on the basis of race, ethnicity, or religion, by employees and officials of DHS.

After carefully reviewing your information, we have determined that CRCL does not have jurisdiction over your concerns. Thank you again for contacting the Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties.
Sincerely,

Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties
U.S. Department of Homeland Security

From: Soleilmavis [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2010 7:08 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Lawsuits filed by Soleilmavis(mind control victim) -- Please help

NAME: SOLEILMAVIS
Citizenship: China
Year Torture/Abuse Began: Dec 2001
Email: [e-mail]

DEAR SIR/MADAM

I am a victim of electronic harassment, organized stalking and torture with Directed Energy Weapons (DEW).
I live in China . I have Chinese citizenship. I was first attacked in December 2001 when I was studying for a Masters Degree in Australia .

I DEMAND AN INTERNATIONAL INVESTIGATION INTO THESE CRIMES AND HUGE VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS.
Here is the link:--
Some lawsuits filed by Soleilmavis
http://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/some-lawsuits-filed-by

Please kindly help my lawsuits.

Thank you and Best Regards!
Soleilmavis
http://peacepink.ning.com

[Soleilmavis]

Subject: Application for Register a case
From: "Registry ECJ"
To: "Soleilmavis"

In reply to your e-mail, it seems appropriate to give some information about the duties and jurisdiction of the Court.

The Court of Justice ensures that in the interpretation and application of the Treaties the law is observed. The interpretation and application of provisions of the national law of the Member States do not form part of its duties. Neither can it hear and determine actions for breach of the European Convention on Human Rights by the authorities of the Signatory States; the Court of Justice is not to be confused with the European Court of Human Rights (see the latter's website at: www.echr.coe.int).

The Court of Justice is not a court of appeal from the national courts and cannot declare their judgments void or vary them.

Private persons may bring proceedings against an institution of the European Union only before the General Court and not before the Court of Justice. In such proceedings representation by a lawyer entitled to practise in a Member State is compulsory.

Disputes with Member States or their authorities, or between private persons fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national courts. This is so even where questions of European Union law are concerned. A court of a Member State may (or in certain circumstances, must), however, refer to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling on questions of European Union law. The parties themselves have no such right.

The Registrar of the Court of Justice is thus unable to take any steps with regard to your e-mail.

For further information regarding the jurisdiction and the work of the Court, please visit the Court's website at: www.curia.europa.eu

For the Registrar

[Soleilmavis]

Replies from ICC

[Robin Yan]

Please take a look at Mr. Attorney General's eamils full of lies and conflicts, what I can say : "shame on him"

Correspondence on behalf of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada‏
To [e-mail]
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Mailout ([e-mail])
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 3:32:08 AM
To: [e-mail]
Always show content from [e-mail]

Dear Mr. Yan:
On behalf of the Honourable Rob Nicholson, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, I acknowledge receipt of your further correspondence of January 15, 2010, concerning your personal situation. As the circumstances of your case appear not to have changed, I can only reiterate that, as Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, Minister Nicholson is mandated to provide legal advice only to the federal government, and therefore, cannot intervene in your case. Furthermore, the issues you describe in your letter are provincial matters. As you know, Minister Nicholson is unable to investigate or launch an inquiry into matters that fall outside his jurisdiction. Federal commissions of inquiry are governed by the Inquiries Act (see www://laws.justice.gc.ca). For more information on commissions of inquiry, you can visit the Privy Council Web site at www.pco-bcp.gc.ca/index.asp?lang=eng&page=information&sub=c....
I understand from your correspondence that you have contacted the provincial offices suggested to you in the previous correspondence that you received from this office, which are the appropriate authorities to address your concerns.If you believe that a criminal offence has been committed, you may wish to bring the matter to the attention of your local police; it will be for them to determine whether charges should be laid. You may also wish to seek the advice of a lawyer in private practice to determine the course of action that will best serve your needs. While I wish you well in resolving your concerns, I must advise you that this office can be of no further assistance to you in this regard.

Yours sincerely,

L. Bisson
Manager
Ministerial Correspondence Unit


Correspondence on behalf of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada‏
发件人： Ministerial Correspondence Unit ([e-mail])
发送时间： 2009年2月20日 14:30:18
收件人： [e-mail]
Dear Mr. Yan:

On behalf of the Honourable Rob Nicholson, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence, which was forwarded by the Office of the Prime Minister, concerning your personal situation.

As Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, Minister Nicholson is mandated to provide legal advice only to the federal government. I hope you will understand that, for this reason, he is not able to intervene in, investigate, or otherwise become involved in matters of a private nature. Similarly, neither departmental officials nor members of his staff are in a position to help resolve personal issues.

I note your desire for a public inquiry regarding your treatment by members of the Toronto police. It may be helpful for you to know that, while the Parliament of Canada is responsible for enacting criminal law, the administration of justice in a province, including policing, is the responsibility of the provincial governments. Therefore, if you have not already done so, you may wish to write to the Honourable Rick Bartolucci, Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services for Ontario, who is responsible for policing services Toronto. His office is located at 25 Grosvenor Street, Floor 18, Toronto, Ontario M7A 1Y6. As Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, Minister Nicholson cannot comment on or commence an inquiry into matters that fall outside his jurisdiction.

The most useful suggestion that I can offer, given your situation, is to seek the advice of a lawyer in private practice to determine the course of action that will best serve your needs. The Law Society of Upper Canada operates the Lawyer Referral Service. The Service can refer you to a lawyer near you who offers the first half hour consultation free. The Service is available from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday to Friday. Please note that calling the line will automatically generate a $6.00 charge on your phone bill in the month following your call. You can reach the Service at 1-900-565-4577.

Thank you for writing.

Yours sincerely,

L. Bisson
Manager
Ministerial Correspondence Unit

[Soleilmavis]

8 Aug 07 A letter from Physicians to victim
Victim Kommy just received a letter from Physicians for Human Rights
http://physiciansforhumanrights.org/about/

Here is the letter:
We are truly sorry for your situation and past and present.
Our organization is not equipped to study such cases, but you may want to try to contact a human rights legal aid organization, such as the ACLU or your local Legal Services group.

Sincerely,
Executive Assistant for PHR
*********************************************************
Executive Assistant/Internship Coordinator
Physicians for Human Rights
2 Arrow Street, Suite 301
Cambridge, MA 02138
www.physiciansforhumanrights.org
20 years of advancing health, dignity and justice

Note from Soleilmavis: From the letter, we know that Physicians fully understand the suffering of victims, They understand that victims are suffering from Mind Control and Directed Energy weapons torture and harassment; They understand that victims are not Psychiatric patients. Only because they are not equipped, that is why they can not study such cases.

I, Soleilmavis also has received a letter from them:
We have received your e-mail regarding your ordeal and are sorry for all the pain and suffering you have been experiencing.
Our organization is unable to assist in these matters, as we do not have the expertise to help; we have referred people to an organization that is made up of others who have experienced such trials, and I don’t know if they can assist you, possibly as a support group, if nothing else.

Here is the contact information of this group:

Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance
P.O. Box 9022 Cincinnati, Ohio 45209
Website: www.freedomfchs.com
E-mail: [e-mail]
Voicemail: 866-310-3117 FAX: [phone]
Contact: Derrick Robinson, President
Sheila Epstein, Vice-President
Juanita Purdy, Secretary

We wish you the best and again are sorry for your ordeal.

Sincerely,

Kathleen Carspecken
Executive Assistant/Internship Coordinator
Physicians for Human Rights
2 Arrow Street, Suite 301 Cambridge, MA 02138
Tel. [phone] Fax. [phone]
www.physiciansforhumanrights.org
20 years of advancing health, dignity and justice

Note from Soleilmavis: Derrick Robinson(USA) is a member of our MC mailteam ([e-mail]), Other members are: John Finch(Australia), Mostafa Hosny (Canada), Soleilmavis (China), Monika Stoces (Belgium).
MC mailteam has been recognized by many(domestic and international) organizations as a victims activists group who are trying best to help victims.（ I did not introduce myself to them, so they referred me to Derrick Robinson）.

Intrudution of Physicians for Human Rights
Physicians for Human Rights was founded in 1981, It mobilizes health professionals to advance health, dignity, and justice and promotes the right to health for all. Harnessing the specialized skills, rigor, and passion of doctors, nurses, public health specialists, and scientists, PHR investigates human rights abuses and works to stop them.
Our research takes us to conflict zones, to AIDS-ravaged Africa, to US prisons and juvenile detention centers―and our advocacy brings us to the offices of national and international policymakers. The courts,
decision makers and the media have come to rely on our credibility and expertise. Motivated by moral urgency, based on science, and anchored in international human rights standards, PHR’s advocacy advances
global health and protects human rights.

[Soleilmavis]

THE RESPONSES - 2004-2010:-

1. EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, STRASBOURG, EUROPE 2006

Application no. 48661/06

"Dear Sir

I write to inform you that on 15 May 2007 the European Court of Human Rights, sitting as a Committee of three judges (E. Myjer, President, E.Fura-Sandstrom and I.Ziemele) pursuant to Article 27 of the Convention, decided under Article 28 of the Convention to declare the above application inadmissable because it did not comply with the requirements set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention.

In the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matters complained of were within its competence, the Court found that they did not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols.

This decision is final and not subject to any appeal to either the Court, including its Grand Chamber, or any other body. You will therefore appreciate that the Registry will be unable to provide any further details about the Committee's deliberations or to conduct further correspondence relating to its decision in this case. You will receive no further documents from the Court concerning this case and, in accordance with the Court's instructions, the file will be destroyed one year after the date of the decision.

The present communication is made pursuant to Rule 53 & 2 of the Rules of Court.

yours faithfully
For the Committee
S. Naismith Deputy Section Registrar" 2006


2. MR HANS-GERT PÖTTERING, PRESIDENT OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, BRUSSELS, EUROPE 2007

A(2007)8511/AT/ssk

"Dear Mr. Finch,

I am writing in reference to your e-mail to the President of the European Parliament.

On behalf of Mr Hans-Gert Pöttering, I thank you for the information you have provided and I can assure you that it has been noted and read with interest.

While the European Parliament supports research activities aimed at creating the knowledge society and strengthening the scientific and technological bases of the Community industry, it has always pointed out the need to respect fundamental ethical principles, including those reflected in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. With regard to the seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013), the Parliament has stated in particular that the opinions of the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies are and will continue to be taken into account. You may wish to read more details at the following Internet addresses:

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA...

http://ec.europa.eu/european_group_ethics/index_en.htm

Yours sincerely,
Jean-Louis COUGNON
Head of Division
European Parliament
General Directorate for Information
Correspondence with Citizens Unit" 2007


3.INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, THE OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR, THE HAGUE, EUROPE 2007

“Dear Sir, Madam

The Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court acknowledges receipt of you documents/letter.

This communication has been duly entered in the Communications Register of the Office. We will give consideration to this communication, as appropriate, in accordance with the provisions of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

As soon as a decision is reached, we will inform you, in writing, and provide you with reasons for this decision.

Yours sincerely

….(illegible) …..

Head of Information and Evidence Unit
Office of the Prosecutor” 2007

see below for their written “decision”.


4. CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS INTERNATIONAL, LOS ANGELES, USA 2007

"Dear Mr. Finch:

Thank you for contacting the Citizens Commission on Human Rights International.

Your abuse documentation is now in our data files. A pattern of abuse may be established by amassing documentation such as yours.

Please understand that CCHR is not a law enforcement or legal agency in any way. We are not an attorney referral service, cannot bring lawsuits against individuals and do not have law enforcement powers. However, we do work with such officials by gathering information such as yours, filing complaints, offering research and other assistance. Any actions performed by CCHR are done as a free public service--we do not charge for our services.

If you decide that you want to file a complaint against a specific psychiatrist or facility, you should send us a full written statement with specific information – names, dates, places, etc. describing the abuse that occurred. If you have questions upon reviewing this letter please contact us.

You can find a wealth of information on psychiatric abuse at website www.mental-health-abuse.org.

Sincerely,

Lorita O'Leary, CCHR Abuse Case Documenter
Citizens Commission on Human Rights International
6616 Sunset Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90028
(800) 869-CCHR (2247)
http://www.cchr.org/index.cfm [e-mail]


5. MS PATSY SÖRENSEN, FORMER MEMBER EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT & a DIRECTOR of “PAYOKE” (NGO) 2007

"Dear all,

This is just to let everyone know we do take this phenomenon seriously and are looking into ways in which we can convince relevant people to take it seriously as well. We would like to thank all the people who have send in their stories, and will keep you informed if not directly then through Monika Stoces.

Hiermit möchten wir allen wissen lassen das wir dieses phenomen ernst nimmen und versuchen werden andere relevante personen es auch ernst nemen zu lassen. Wir mochten auch gern jeden danken die ihre geschichten gemaild hatten, wir sollen sie informieren uber unsere befindungen von hier oder via Monika Stoces.

kind regards,
Gert Nuyts (assistent)
Patsy Sörensen,Payoke NGO
Leguit 4,2000 Antwerpen, Belgium
T. 0032-3-201.16.90
EMAIL:[e-mail] www.payoke.be


6. THE CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, NEW YORK, USA 2006/7

17/4/08 - no response at all although they have recently filed the following "tip-of-the-iceberg" lawsuit:-

"CCR Files Suit over NSA Domestic Spying Program
Center for Constitutional Rights Believes Privileged Attorney-Client Communications Were Intercepted by NSA without Warrants

Synopsis

In New York, on January 17, 2006, the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) filed a lawsuit against President George W. Bush, the head of the National Security Agency (NSA), and the heads of the other major security agencies, challenging the NSA's surveillance of persons within the United States without judicial approval or statutory authorization. The suit seeks an injunction that would prohibit the government from conducting warrantless surveillance of communications in the U.S. CCR filed the suit in the Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York on its own behalf and on behalf of CCR attorneys and legal staff representing clients who fit the criteria described by the Attorney General for targeting under the NSA Surveillance Program.

As has been widely reported, for over four years the NSA, with the approval of the president, has engaged in a program of widespread warrantless electronic surveillance of telephone calls and emails in violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). The suit argues that the NSA Surveillance Program violates a clear criminal law, exceeds the president's authority under Article II of the Constitution, and violates the First and Fourth Amendments. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act explicitly authorizes foreign intelligence electronic surveillance only upon orders issued by federal judges on a special court. It expressly authorizes warrantless wiretapping only for the first fifteen days of a war, and makes it a crime to engage in wiretapping without specific statutory authority. Rather than seeking to amend this statute, the president simply violated it by authorizing warrantless wiretapping of Americans without statutory authority or court approval. As a result,the President violated his oath of office to take care that the laws of this nation are faithfully executed, and instead secretly violated a criminal prohibition duly enacted by Congress.

CCR has been one of the most active opponents of the illegal detention, torture and intelligence gathering practices this administration instituted in the wake of the terrorist attacks of 9/11. As part of its mission to fight violations of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, the Center for Constitutional Rights represents hundreds of men detained indefinitely without charge as "enemy combatants" at Guantanamo Bay; Maher Arar, a Canadian citizen accused of al Qaeda ties and rendered from the United States to Syria for the purpose of being tortured; and Muslim immigrants unreasonably and wrongfully detained in the U.S. for months without probable cause or criminal charges in the wake of 9/11.

In the course of representing these clients, the Center's lawyers have engaged in innumerable telephone calls and e-mails with people outside the United States, including their clients, their clients'families and outside lawyers, potential witnesses, and others. Given that the government has accused many of CCR's overseas clients of being associated with Al Qaeda or of interest to the 9/11 investigation, there is little question that these attorneys have been subject to the NSA Surveillance Program. The Center filed today's lawsuit in order to protect CCR attorneys' right to represent their clients free of unlawful and unchecked surveillance.

CCR Legal Director Bill Goodman said, "On this, the day following Martin Luther King Day, we are saddened that the illegal electronic surveillance that once targeted that great American has again become characteristic of our present government. As was the case with Dr. King, this illegal activity is cloaked in the guise of national security. In reality, it reflects an attempt by the Bush Administration to exercise unchecked power without the inconvenient interference of the other co-equal branches of government."

According to CCR attorney Shayana Kadidal, "The mere existence of the program harms CCR and our attorneys because it serves to inhibittheir ability to institute and effectively litigate these suits."

The Center for Constitutional Rights is represented in the suit by CCR attorneys Bill Goodman, Shayana Kadidal, and Michael Ratner, and CCR cooperating attorney David Cole. Also appearing as an attorney

for CCR, is Professor Michael Avery, president of the National Lawyers Guild (NLG), on behalf of the NLG." 2007


7. USA REPRESENTATIVE JIM GUEST’S (MO) LETTER 10/10/2007

WEB: http://www.freedomfchs.com/repjimguestltr.pdf
http://www.msnusers.com/JAMESWALBERTFILE/shoebox.msnw?action=ShowPh...

“October 10, 2007
Dear Member of the Legislature and Friends:

This letter is to ask for your help for the many constituents in our country who are being affected unjustly by electronic weapons torture and covert harassment groups. Serious privacy rights violations and physical injuries have been caused by the activities of these groups and their use of so-called non-lethal weapons on men, women, and even children.

I am asking you to play a role in helping these victims and also stopping the massive movement in the use of Verichip and RFID technologies in tracking Americans. . . . . .”

Sincerely,
Representative Jim Guest EMAIL: [e-mail] , [e-mail]
WEB: http://jimguest.com/


8. THE ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY, UK – 22 MAY 2008

LAMBETH PALACE
Mr Andrew Nunn
Correspondence Secretary
to the Archbishop of Canterbury

OUR REF: 63443
22 MAY 2008
Mr Rudy Andria
Paris, France

Dear Mr Andria

The Archbishop of Canterbury has asked me to write thanking you for your 19th May letter, but to say with regret that he is not in a position to help. He is sorry about that.

Yours Sincerely
(signature)

LAMBETH PALACE, LONDON SE1 7JU

[Soleilmavis]

14. MEETING WITH MR NIGEL FARRAGE, MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, from UKIP ( United Kingdom Independence and Democracy Party), BRUSSELS, EUROPE 24/6/08

From: FARAGE Nigel [e-mail]
Date: 24 jun. 2008 17:38
Subject: RE: "THE STRASBOURG DEMONSTRATION" at THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, July 7,8 + 2008 - WAR CRIMES AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY – REFERENCES & LINKS
To: Monika Stoces [e-mail]

Dear Monika Stoces

Thank you for your mailing - and good luck with your demo at the Strasbourg-site! If you would like to send two people into the buildings, I shall gladly meet them at the entrance to the LOW-building, on Tuesday or Wednesday afternoon, and provide them with passes. I should be interested to have a chat.

Please call (0033) 3881 77855 or [phone] 454, when delegation is ready to enter.

Yours sincerely
Andrew S. Reed
(Office of Nigel Farage)

STRASBOURG MEETING - HOW DID IT GO? July 9, 2008

Dear All
Despite the relatively small number of participants ( 19 ), all in all the Strasburg demo was quite a success. The majority of the victims present were from Germany:
Germany: 9, Italy: 3, Switzerland: 2, Belgium: 2, France:1, Austria: 1 and Morocco: 1
As agreed, Swetlana and Walter Madliger had a chat with Andrew Reed of the Office of MP Nigel Farage. A detailed summary of the meeting will be posted later.
French FR3 TV kept their promise to me and came on Monday 7th to interview us and to film the demo.
This demo not only gave us an intense sense of pleasure and enjoyment of fighting together, but this in turn made us more than ready to indulge in that most human of activities - social interaction- the sharing of experiences and the simple but enduring pleasure of enjoying each other's company and conversation.
Two news editors left messages on my answering machine to apologize for being held up at the last minute and wish to make up for it by inviting me for an interview next week.
One might well think all this is a promising start.
With all good wishes
Rudy
[e-mail]

July 14, 2008
Here is the English version of Swetlana's and Walter's summary-report on their meeting with Andrew Reed of the Office of MEP Nigel Farage. An Italian version will be sent to Paolo's group, later on. Rudy

SUMMARY REPORT
Summary report on the meeting with Mr Andrew Reed, assistant to Mr Nigel Farage, MEP, from UKIP ( United Kingdom Independence and Democracy Party) on July 8th, 2008 in the Europarliament Low Building in Strasbourg, France, from 1.45 p.m to 3.10 p.m.

DEMOCRACY IN SEVERE CRISIS
Our chat with Mr Andrew Reed could be summed up with the above title. Unfortunately, the delegation of the Strasbourg demonstration,Mrs Swetlana Schunin and myself,Walter Madliger could not speak to Mr Nigel Farage, MEP personally, but he came by for a short while, just to greet us. Mr Andrew Reed not only confirmed the title of this article, but he was also critical of the EU policy, whose relationship with the citizens is generally too impersonal. He explained the mechanisms of political power and their influences on democracy. He gave us an outline of the abuse of power which is easily possible in a democracy and is more and more widespread. This, of course, is very alarming.

The abuse of power is the essence of moral evil. Moral evil occurs, when the authorities refuse to accept the responsibility for the welfare of those who are logically under their care. When there is no close ties with the citizens, moral evil and tort are common practice. The abuse of power is the telltale sign of democracies in crisis. We are governed by a distant political elite,which has lost all contact with the people.

Nobody than we, the victims of mindcontrol and electronic harassment , could have agreed more.

While Mr Andrew Reed tried to make us understand his position and his problems, we tried to get a word in and present our own problems. He asked about the whys and wherefores of this control of the psyche, when it had occured and how it had impacted on us. We gave him a few examples and an update of psychophysical means and weapons, and of the existing laws on their misuse. He took down notes of all this.

In my opinion , he was very well aware of all these means and weapons, and even of the laws, but he did not show how much aware he was. He also seemed to let us understand he has very scarce knowledge of the HAARP issue and the EU-Resolution A4-0005/99, although the UK is one of the most important states, which have participated in the similar EISCAT installations in Norway. He made no comments on our allegations that England used mindcontrol technology in the Northern Ireland Conflict and on the island itself, e.g.in Greenham Commons in 1988.

We talked about the development and the proliferation of Non-lethal Weapons and the international symposia in Ettlingen, Germany. When we asked him about a possible specific reaction of the EU-Parliament to the problems under discussion, (e.g. in the form of a specific EU-resolution), he could not promise us that he would be able to organize and form a subcommittee for this purpose, nor even a subcommittee for the investigation of our allegations and complaints.

The assenting votes of quite a few delegates would be needed and the party's fraction in the EU-Parliament would be just a bit too small. Whether this statement was 100% true, I doubt a bit, as the overall number of the so-called “Eurosceptics” fraction amounts to 37 , to the best of my knowledge.

In other words, a specific EU-Resolution regarding mindcontrol means and electronic harassment weapons is not yet in sight. Apparently, there is some “understanding” of our complaints, but in the end nobody is willing to really do something about it.

The question we have to ask ourselves is what will everything be like, if we ask the politicians and the governments to forbid and stop the use of the weapons in question on human beings. They are, right now, lining their greedy pockets with a quick profit, they are, right now, making their dictatorial dreams come true . So who wants to kill the goose that lays the golden eggs?

At the end of the meeting, we handed out information material to Mr Andrew Reed ( books of Jim Keith and Mr Gehring and additional info-material, the Smirnov-DVD ). It remains to be seen whether or not Mr Reed will have a look at them. When we pointed out that the fate and the whole future of our children are at stake, Mr Reed agreed and was quite impressed.

Comment:
At least, the European Parliament has now been informed by a first hand source. Now, they know that there exist citizens who want to fight for the issue and for their most fundamental Human Rights. This issue and that of getting the delegates to support our cause should now be our most important goal.

July 12, 2008 THE STRASBURG DEMONSTRATION
Here's the English version of Swetlana's report written in German. More to come later. Rudy

THE DEMONSTRATION OF EUROPEAN VICTIMS IN THE FRENCH CITY OF STRASBURG ON JULY 7TH AND JULY 8TH, 2008

The demonstration of European victims took place under the motto "against human experiments with psychophysical weapons" in the French city of Strasburg in front of the European Parliament building on July 7th and at the Council of Europe on July 8th, 2008. One week before the demonstration, we sent information to several editorial staff and TV channels in Strasburg and in other cities of France and Europe. And they did come to the Europarliament on July 7th to support us! The aim of the demonstration was to call the attention of the parliamentarians and the population of Strasburg, to arouse their interest and to ask a press coverage of the issue. In addition, we demanded an extension of the European weapon law which forbids the illegal trading, the illegal possession and the illegal use of psychophysical weapons.

We demanded that an appropriate law put a stop to all kinds of abuse by criminal organisations, and by the military and Secret Services . The organizers of this demonstration in Strasburg were: Swetlana Schunin and Christina Marx from Germany, and Walter Madliger from Switzerland. We have provided flyers in English and German and made posters with the following slogans:

1. Governments are incapable of fighting electromagnetic terror!
2. You might become a victim!
3. Stop psycho-experiments on innocent human beings, immediately!
4. Abusive irradiation technologies on citizens!
5. Prohibition of the control of human subconsciousness!
6. We must put an end to a terrible genocide!
7. Secret services and state criminals are carrying out their experiments remotely!
8. Stop military-medical experiments on peaceful citizens!
9. Brutal tortures and secret murders of innocent people in many countries!
10. Dr. V. Agischev is the criminal head of the "Skvortsova-Stepanova" psychiatric hospital in St. Petersburg!

We called hundreds of European and German victims and emailed lots of invitations. Many victims could not join us for health and financial reasons. But they all sent us short messages saying their thoughts were with us. So, a relatively small number of victims turned up at the demonstration.
We all met at 9.30 a.m on Monday, July 7th in front of the Europarliament. 22 victims altogether turned up from all Europe: 10 from Germany, 3 from Italy, 2 from Russia, 2 from Belgium, 2 from Switzerland, 1 from Austria, 1 from France and 1 from Spain/Morocco. Two supporters from Strasburg joined in with the group later. All demonstrators spared neither time nor efforts throughout the 2-day demonstration. We managed to hand out 800 info sheets to the passers-by, to the parliamentarians and to the tourists in front of the Europarliament and the Council of Europe buildings. Many citizens did show an interest in our problem and some others already knew about this crime.

On Monday 7th, about 11 a.m, two reporters of French TV Channel FR3 came to support us and to make an interview . Some activists told them about this worldwide crime.The press took great interest in our situation. We, therefore, hope that they will give accurate coverage of the whole event. We were particularly impressed at seeing Italian and Moroccan activists Paola Sbronzeri, Paolo Dorigo and Fouzia stopping the cars on the street and handing out flyers to the drivers. Throughout the two-day demonstration our posters helped the passers-by and prospective supporters to understand the whys and wherefores of our action. Although the Secret Services and the French CRS police armed to the teeth controlled our demonstration from start to finish, everything went off quite smoothly.
On the second day, from 10 o'clock onwards we once again informed the tourists, drivers and passers-by at the Council of Europe building. Our posters had a very big effect on the passers-by. In the afternoon, as agreed, Swetlana Schunin and Walter Madliger had a one-hour audience with Andrew Reed of the office of MEP Nigel Paul Farage. We think that this meeting is a promising start for all of us. The central issue is that we were able to call the attention and to arouse the interest of the parliamentarians, the press, the Strasburgers and the foreign tourists with only 24 demonstrators.

The work we did all together throughout the two-day event inspired us and other victims to organise even bigger demonstrations in the future. This European demonstration in Strasburg has shown that we can defeat these brutal barbarians only by joining all our forces. We all think it was a big success. And we had the pleasure of sharing our experiences and of enjoying each other's company in a friendly atmosphere. We will carry on with our common action to save everyone of us from these sadists' cruel tortures, we will keep on fighting so that every man and every child on the planet can live and sleep quietly without tortures and psychological terror!

The organizer of the Strasburg demonstration and president of the "Association Against the Abuse of Psychophysical Weapons"
Swetlana Schunin

[Soleilmavis]

15. RECAP OF MY/OUR ACTIVISM SINCE JANUARY 2008
from RUDY - [e-mail] 3/7/08

1. A few contacted authorities did not follow through into further help other than the initial promise of support .
2. Many of them fizzled out .
3. Some "people" got to them to block their continued help or...
4. Some decided they do not wish to get further involved .

We had loads of potential help. For various reasons many of them backed out.

So here is the situation:-
a) We had to deal with lots of "pies-in-the- sky", "lip-service- experts", "just-hot-air" and "just-for- show" people.
b) Lots of them were just "deaf-ears".
c) Many backed out for more or less mysterious reasons
d) Some were " experts in arrogance "
e) Some did try to do their best
f) Some confessed they couldn't do much

VIII. THOSE WHO ARE STILL HELPING US
Spanish Journalist Rafael Palacio
Rowena Thursby of UK KIG

IX. And now, the GOOD news
1.Six European journalists have agreed to have a meeting with me in Paris, early September 2008. The date is still to be arranged.
2. All the news editors who came to the Strasburg demo in July 2008 agree to follow through into further help.


16. THE RIGHT REVEREND JOHN NOBLE VICAR GENERAL DIOCESE OF MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA 14/7/08

14/7/08
Dear Mr Finch
The Archbishop of Melbourne is currently overseas and will be away for some weeks ahead.
In his absence I am responding to your letter of the 7th July.
I note the concerns your letter raises and have read the attachments you provided.
Your immediate request was for access to a safe house, as a place of protection from the the things you have been experiencing. Unfortunately we do not have the resources to address the general issues you raise, nor are we able to provide you with acess to the type of accomodation you require.
I trust you may be able to find the help you need through some other line of enquiry.

Grace & peace in Christ Jesus
Yours sincerely
The The Right Reverend John Noble, Vicar General Diocese Of Melbourne,

[Soleilmavis]

17. MR NIGEL FARRAGE, MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, from UKIP ( United Kingdom Independence and Democracy Party), BRUSSELS, EUROPE 28/7/08

Subject: UKIP-response to FAMCE-delegation
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:27:12 +0200
From: [e-mail]
To: [e-mail], [e-mail]

Dear Monika and Rudy

Three weeks ago, as you know, a FAMCE-delegation, consisting of Swetlana Schunin and Walter Madliger, was received at the UKIP-offices in the LOW-building of the EU's consultative assembly, at Strasbourg, and submitted certain documents, with a view to promoting awareness of the need to monitor and control a range of electronic weapons, which, according to numerous reports, have been under development for several decades and have been used, covertly, in various parts of the world, to the discomfort and distress of many people.

Most notable, among the documents submitted - because it comes, as it were, from the horse's mouth - is the programme of the "4th European Symposium on Non-Lethal Weapons 2007", held by the "European Working Group on Non-Lethal Weapons" (EWG-NLW) http://www.non-lethal-weapons.com/leaflet.pdf at the Stadthalle, in Ettlingen, Germany.

This programme, containing as it does, such items as "Software and Hardware of Instrumentation for Human-State Control in the Influence-Field of Microwave Radiation", "Psychological Effects of Non-Lethal Weapons: a new Approach for Defining more Effective Uses" and "Bio-Impulse: a Research Program to Study the Effects of Nanosecond Electromagnetic Pulses on Biological Cells", bears out the studies and anecdotal evidence, submitted by the delegation, to the extent that research into electronic weapons, for the purposes of effecting pain, injury and mind-manipulation, is certainly going on.

Furthermore, judging by the sources of the presentations made at the symposium, most of this research is proceeding in the EU, the USA and Russia. Note too that, at this same symposium (on 23rd May, item V27) the International Committee of the Red Cross sponsored a presentation on the subject of "Ensuring the protection of Civilians and Respect for International Humanitarian Law".

The delegation did not mention that the EWG-NLW is now preparing for its "5th European Symposium on Non-Lethal Weapons 2009" - also to be held at the Stadthalle in Ettlingen - and is appealing for prospective presenters, either of discussions (25 mins) or of posters, to send in their abstracts before the 1st October.
http://www.ict.fraunhofer.de/fhg/Images/Callforpapers5EuropeanSympo...

If FAMCE has not done so, I would recommend that it submit an abstract for this symposium - as the Red Cross successfully did, last year - in order to promote awareness of the themes of its campaign among those who know most about the technology, which FAMCE alleges is being mis-used. EWG-NLG's response to such an application might be informative; and, even if the application is unsuccessful, FAMCE should attempt, at least, to attend the symposium in order to gather intelligence.

EWG-NLW's website (URL given above) states that "The working Group is open to all European organizations working in the area of Non-Lethal Weapons", so, unless the membership-fee is prohibitively high, I do not see why FAMCE should not join the working-group as a full member, get closer to the sources (which remain tantalisingly vague) of the problems it identifies, and develop a voice within a forum, which will be able to appreciate, better than any other, the significance of what it is saying.

As for the wider political context, in which electronic weapons are being developed, I would have thought it quite clear that the real danger to democracy, the rule of law and the rights of the individual, comes, not from the weapons themselves (knives and clubs can be used just as secretly and unattributably as electronic weapons) but from the erosion of democracy by supranational organisations, such as the EU, and clandestine, politico-commercial influences, such as the Council on Foreign Relations and the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House)

I agree completely with the opening chapters of Jim Keith's "Mass Control: Engineering Human Consciousness", which the delegation gave me, and which describes the grip exerted on US-policy by surreptitious societies, large corporations and secret agencies, and the sinister data-gathering programmes of the (not yet quite sovereign) EU. The restoration of democracy, under these circumstances, is the only possible answer to misconduct by these various, sinister entities. Even passing laws, like the ones now "in force", against the mis-use of electronic weapons, in some US-states, is completely ineffective as long as governments and courts remain under the undue influence of special interests, whether commercial or supranational.

Persuasive too is Heiner Gehring's book "Versklavte Gehirne", which the delegation also gave me, and which charts the control and misuse of the mass-media by the governments and other entities described above, showing that the restoration of democracy - through the decision of informed electorates - can only be achieved if the dis-information, propagated by an oligarchy of media-chains, can somehow be countered.

This is the essential business of the UK Independence Party (UKIP) and its supporters, among whom, therefore, I should like to count the FAMCE.

Even so, it may be possible to influence the situation for the better, by exposing the abuse of electronic weapons, if attacks of this kind can be clearly documented and liability can be clearly established. The confused anecdotes of people, who claim to have been rendered mentally ill by such attacks, are, by their very nature, ambiguous and unreliable, and must be supported by some kind of concrete evidence. When such evidence does emerge, UKIP's representatives in the Houses of Parliament in London (rather than those in the EU's sham counterpart in Brussels) will be well-placed to present it, and I shall certainly assist them in doing so.

Meanwhile, if you have specific questions, which our Westminster-representatives can usefully put to government-ministers, I would be pleased to relay these to them; but action in the EU's institutions is virtually impossible. Written questions to the EU-Commission receive bland replies after several weeks. An independent Political Group, such as ours, is effectively prevented from tabling items for the plenary agenda, and "MEP's", who are not supporters of the régime, are treated, in general, with contempt and are ignored. All of this helps to demonstrate the EU's inherently anti-democratic structure, which should not be appealed to, under any circumstances, because doing so would imply recognition of a legitimacy it does not possess.

For us, the EU-assembly provides a platform for publicity in Britain, and nothing more. It does not influence the EU's essential powers (as the fate of the Resolution of 1999, against the mis-use of electronic weapons, demonstrates) but, on all matters of moment, merely echoes the EU-Commission. As a platform, however - and lacking any other, as we did until three years ago, when we first obtained representation at Westminster - it has been invaluable to us, and will probably continue to be so, for some time.

Now that we have made contact, and begun to work together, therefore, I look forward to maintaining a fruitful association with FAMCE.

Yours sincerely
Andrew S. Reed
Office of Nigel Farage, Brussels MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (UKIP)

[Soleilmavis]

18. THE INDEPENDENT COMMISSIONER PETER J O'CALLAGHAN ARCHDIOCESE OF MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA 1/8/08

From: Marilyn Stefanile
Date: Aug 1, 2008 10:20 AM
Subject: Email from Peter O'Callaghan
To: [e-mail]

Dear Mr Finch

I have received your email expressing your complaints in relation to the matters referred to.

I confirm that I am the Independent Commissioner appointed by the Archdiocese of Melbourne to enquire into allegations of sexual abuse by priests, religious and lay persons within the Archdiocese of Melbourne.

I note your serious concerns, but they do not fall within my jurisdiction. I sympathise with your concerns, but am unable to assist you.

Yours sincerely
Peter J O'Callaghan - Independent Commissioner
Telephone: [phone]


19. NEW YORK STATEHOUSE HEARINGS REGARDING OUR ISSUES SLATED FOR FEBRUARY - 22/8/08

On Thursday, Tim in New York met with State Senator Eric Adams, a boyhood friend of his who is has recently met with some TI's regarding our issues. I wrote about him in the newsletter a couple of weeks ago. He has been reviewing informational material from us for the past 2-3 weeks.

In the meeting, Rep. Adams stated that he wants to hold hearings concerning OS/EH harassment in February. He's asking that we send a brief summary of our harassment for his review to: [e-mail] The hearing is open to the public. Therefore, anyone anywhere in New York state, the country or the globe can give their testimony or attend. For clarity and time considerations he is reviewing the summaries submitted for testimony. The location for the hearing will be New York City. The exact address has not been determined. We'll of course have a group of expert witnesses to address the senators about the technology and the psychology of the abuses as well. We've provided him a suggested list of experts who have expressed their willingness to testify. Those people he plans to contact and interview personally.

He also mentioned that he wants media involvement, which he could generate. And that this hearing would be the start of spinoff hearings in other states and would ultimately result in a congressional hearing.

It would certainly be beneficial if there were some other state representatives that could work with him on this hearing. Hopefully, we will find others who will come forward to lend their support to these issues.

One last comment: Scheduling of the hearing is the first step. Completing the hearing is the goal. And 5 1/2 months to go gives the stalkers plenty of time for mischief. Those that were around last year will remember the television show that we were all counting on, only to have it cancelled just days before taping. And the Firecracker Films documentary that never materialized. And numerous television and newspaper reporters that contacted us and never heard from again. So we've got to remember that something of this magnitude may encounter perp interference. What I'm suggesting is that for all who are believers that we need to remain in prayer for this event - for Senator Adams and for the success of the hearing. Also keep in mind that the month of February in New York could bring issues with the weather, which the perps have been known to bring on at just the exact time. So please keep all these things in mind as we pray, and pray believing. Personally, my belief is that we can only succeed in this struggle with God's help. A word to the wise is sufficient.

All this will be discussed at the conference call this Saturday night. And if there's time, Dale Wahl will join us to talk about his project.

For further questions or comments about the state hearing, please contact Tim in New York at: [e-mail]


20. SUMMARY REPORT OF MY MEETING WITH THE LAWYERS IN PARIS
September 13, 2008 by Rudy Andria [e-mail]

Only 3 lawyers turned up, the other 3 were held up at their offices at the last moment and briefly chatted with us on the phone.

1.They all know about the existence of various technological means which violate the fundamental human rights of innocent people , they know the existence of non lethal weapons and of highly sophisticated psychological pressures.

2.They do not have the slightest doubt about some governments' participation in influencing or even destroying the free will of some people.

3.They know that the exposure of such practices usually provokes sniggering and those who dare to complain are either made fun of or accused of paranoia.
Paranoia , of course, does exist and as it is characterized by an excessive mistrust of other people's acts or an excessive mistrust of power, it affects every social relationship and makes it possible to justify exclusion .

4.Utmost rigour and precision are therefore required when exposing the attacks on the victims' integrity, privacy and freedom of thought by invisible means. .
It is only by building up impeccable fact-files supported by official reports and scientific studies that public opinion worldwide can be sensitized and made aware of the problem.
It is only under these conditions of rigour and precision that the 3 lawyers present will agree to put the case for the defence.

The 3 lawyers all agreed on the following points:
Our difficulty is that we have practically no legal evidence of the attacks, so we have to make do with:
a) statistics
b) similarities in symptoms and experiences
c) similarities of torture cases
d) existence of weapons'patents
e) existence of the technology patents for the use of V2K
f) complicity of a number of psychiatrists worldwide
G) the highly probable involvement of many governments ( two lawyers referred to the example of helicopters and said that not many people can afford to maintain aircrafts. Flights are logged and the airspace they are in is recorded).

Rudy Andria
September 13, 2008

I've forgotten to add 1 point: the 3 lawyers think that our first help should come from the parliamentarians, because they are the ones who make the laws.


21. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT – The Office of the Prosecutor

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT – The Office of the Prosecutor
Our Reference: OTP-CR-70/07
The Hague, Monday, 29 September 2008

Dear Sir/Madam

On behalf of the Prosecutor, I thank you for your communication received 21/2/2007, as well as any subsequent related information.

As you may know, the International Criminal Court (“the ICC” or “the Court”) is governed by the Rome Statute, which entrusts the court with a very specific and carefully defined jurisdiction and mandate. A fundamental feature of the Rome Statute is that the Court may only exercise jurisdiction over persons for the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole, namely genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, as defined in the Rome Statute (Articles 6 to 8). The Court may only exercise jurisdiction over crimes committed on or after 1 July 2002 (Article 11). In addition, the Court may only exercise jurisdiction over crimes committed on the territory of a State that has accepted the jurisdiction of the Court or by a national of such a State (Article 12), or where the Security Council refers the situation to the Court 9Article 13).

Accordingly, I regret to advise you that your communication appears to relate to matters outside the jurisdiction of the Court. The Prosecutor has therefore confirmed that there is not a basis at this time to proceed with further analysis. The information you have submitted will be maintained in our archives, and the decision not to proceed may be reconsidered if new facts or evidence provide a reasonable basis to believe that a crime the jurisdiction of the Court has been committed.

I hope you will appreciate that with the defined jurisdiction of the Court, many serious allegations will be beyond the reach of this institution to address, I note in this regard that the ICC is designed to complement, not replace national jurisdictions. Thus, if you wish to pursue this matter further, you may consider raising it with other appropriate national or international authorities.

I am grateful for your interest in the ICC. If you would like to learn more about the work of the ICC, I invite you to visit our website at www.icc-cpi.int .

John Finch
5/8 Kemp Street, Thornbury, Vic, 3071, Australia

Yours sincerely
{signature}

M.P. Dillon
Head of the Information & Evidence Unit
Office of the Prosecutor

Post Office Box 19519, 2500 CM The Hague, The Netherlands
TEL: [phone] FAX: [phone] http://www.icc-cpi.int


22. 2nd LETTER FROM REPRESENTATIVE JIM GUEST - 8/10/08
http://www.msnusers.com/JAMESWALBERTFILE/shoebox.msnw?action=ShowPh...


JIM GUEST STATE REPRESENTATIVE MISSOURI
DISTRICT ADDRESS
P.O. BOX 412, KING CITY, MO 64463
Tel: [phone]

To Whom It May Concern:

I have worked for 3 years with Microwave and Electronic Harassment victims throughout the US and overseas. It is hard for others to understand the technology that is being used to destroy people’s lives. I know James because he contacted me for help. James has worked to find proof of what has happened to him.

Many victims try hard to get help from professional doctors to help find devices such as Veri-Chip. I would request that you and those who can make a difference would help James and others to find answers.

5th District State Representative


23..THE TAOISEACH OF IRELAND - 8/10/08

Dear Mr. Finch,

I wish to acknowledge receipt of your e-mail of 3 October 2008 which will be brought to the Taoiseach's attention as soon as possible.

Yours sincerely,

David King
Assistant Private Secretary to the Taoiseach

Telephone: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail] , [e-mail] , [e-mail]

The Department of the Taoiseach is committed to providing a professional, efficient and courteous service to all our customers. To view the Customer Charter, please click on
http://www.taoiseach.gov.ie/index.asp?1ocID=181&docID=1762


23. MR NIGEL FARRAGE, MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, from UKIP ( United Kingdom Independence and Democracy Party), BRUSSELS, EUROPE 30/1/09

Dear Mr Finch

Thank you for this account of your hideous experiences and the technology, which might have been used to occasion them.

The UK Independence Party is supporting the initiative, by Dr Walter Madlinger, to demonstrate such matters to an expert audience, at the Ettlingen Conference on Non-Lethal Weapons, on 11th May, this year, and I would encourage you to attend, if you are not already planning to do so.

Yours sincerely
Andrew S. Reed
(Office of Nigel Farage, Brussels)
EMAIL: [e-mail]


24. MR ANTHONY ROMERO, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ACLU, 13/2/09

Dear John,

Thank you for speaking out against the abuse of the "state secrets" doctrine. We know your time is limited, and we appreciate your efforts to protect civil liberties.

The ACLU works daily in courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and laws of the United States guarantee everyone in this country. We need your support now more than ever as we work to restore liberties lost over the last eight years. If you have a moment, please make a donation today. Visit www.aclu.org/donate.

Thanks again for taking action. We'll keep you up-to-date on this important legislation.

Sincerely,
Anthony D. Romero
Executive Director, ACLU
[e-mail]


25. MR NIKIFOROUS DIAMANDOUROS, THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN, 28/5/09

S2009-104176
STRASBOURG 8/5/09
COMPLAINT NUMBER: 1568/2006/(AVM)OV

Dear Sir (Mr John Finch)

I am writing in reply of your email of 9 April 2009 in which you come back on your earlier complaint 1568/2006/(AVM)OV.

You allege that some extreme and horrendous criminality is being conducted by agencies related to the US government with the complicity of many other government and security agencies. You state that victims as you are being subjected to torture and mental and physical destruction and that this has remained completely unreported. You state that, more particularly, you are being completely mutilated and neutralised by electro-magnetic radiation and that you are “brain-broadcasted”.

As I already informed you in my letters of 22 June and 14 September 2006, I have unfortunately no power to intervene in this matter, because your allegations are not directed against a European Union institution or body.

However given that you are residing in Australia, I would like to repeat my earlier advice that, in case you have an allegation against an Australian government agency, you might consider contacting the Australian Ombudsman:

Commonwealth Ombudsman
National Office
GPO Box 442, Canberra ACT 2601
Ground Floor, I Farrell Place
Canberra City ACT 2600
http://www.comb.gov.au
[e-mail]

I regret I cannot be of further assistance.

Yours sincerely,

P. Nikiforos DIAMANDOROUS
The European Ombudsman
1 Ave President Robert Schumann – CS 30403 – F-67001 strasbourg Cedex
TEL: [phone] – fax: [phone]
http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu – [e-mail]


26. THE PREMIER OF NSW, AUSTRALIA, 6/8/09

EA1470971 – HSJB

Dear Mr Finch

The Premier has received your recent email concerning your reported experiences in Russia, Turkey and China.

As the subject you have raised primarily relates to areas of Australian Government responsibility, Mr Rees is unable to be of direct assistance.

Accordingly, the opportunity has been taken to bring the terms of your approach to the attention of the Australian Government.

Yours sincerely
Emanuel Sklavounos
for Director General


27. PROF. DR. ADRIAN EUGEN HOLLAENDER, CENTER OF LEGAL RESEARCH, UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA, 11/8/09

CENTER OF LEGAL RESEARCH,
Prof. Dr. Adrian Eugen Hollaender,
Chairman of The Austrian Fundamental Rights Conference,
Human Rights Seminar Instructor at the University of Vienna

Dear Mr. Finch:

With great concern, I have read your complaint about ENERGY AND NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONS TORTURE, DEGRADATION AND MUTILATION CASE.

If you wish, I could examine the case under the legal perspective and write a legal expertise on it that you can use in the complaint procedures.

Sincerely,
Prof. Hollaender
Email: [e-mail]

[Soleilmavis]

28. MR NIKIFOROUS DIAMANDOUROS, THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN, 11/9/09

S2009-104176
STRASBOURG 8/5/09
COMPLAINT NUMBER: 1568/2006/(AVM)OV

Dear Sir (Mr John Finch)

I am writing in reply to your emails of 10, 11, 17 and 18 August 2009 in which you come back on your earlier complaint 1568/2006/(AVM)OV concerning your “directed energy and neurological weapons torture, degradation and mutilation case” you also sent me a “list of the crimes committed by the NWO criminals”.

As I already informed you in my letters 22 June and 14 September 2006, and 8 May 2009, I unfortunately have no power to intervene in this matter.

I regret that I cannot be of further assistance to you in this case

Yours sincerely,

P. Nikiforos DIAMANDOROUS
The European Ombudsman
1 Ave President Robert Schumann – CS 30403 – F-67001 strasbourg Cedex
TEL: [phone] – fax: [phone]
http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu – [e-mail]


29. MR MARTIN FERGUSON, MEMBER OF AUSTRALIAN PARLIAMENT, 7/1/10

REF: MF/MK (2010/01/07)

Dear Mr Finch

Further to our recent meeting, I have written to the Attorney General, Robert McClelland requesting that your suspicion about constant monitoring of your life by ASIO and the Australian Federal Police be investigated.

You will be advised of any response I receive from the Attorney General.

Best wishes for 2010

Yours sincerely
MARTIN FERGUSON AM MP
Federal Member for Batman, Minister for Resource and Energy, Minister for Tourism
www.martinferguson.com.au


30. MR IAN CARNELL, INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY, OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY, AUSTRALIA, 24/3/10

Correspondence reference: 2010/505
File reference: 2009/62
24 March 2010

Mr John Finch, [e-mail]

Dear Mr Finch

Thank you for your email of 16 March 2010 asking for protection from surveillance, torture and abuse. I have read your email and note that you believe you are being tortured and abused by ‘directed energy and neuroligical weapons’ by United States government agencies with the complicity of other governments and security agencies.

Before responding to your specific concerns, it is appropriate that I inform you a little about the role and functions of my office.

The Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS) has general oversight responsibilities for each of the six Australian intelligence agencies. The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) is Australia’s domestic security agency and is therefore the Australian intelligence agency most likely to have interaction with Australian persons. The focus of ASIO’s work is on countering terrorism, discouraging people who may act violently for political reasons, and discouraging people who seek to clandestinely obtain sensitive government information or otherwise harm Australia’s interests in order to further their own causes or the interests of foreign governments.

Other ASIO functions include collecting foreign intelligence within Australia, and providing security assessments and protective security advice.

Based on my experience as IGIS for nearly six years, I can assure you that neither ASIO nor any agency within the Australian Intelligence Community (AIC) has the resources, motivation or legal authority to harm individuals in the way you describe.

I am confident in making this assertion because ASIO and the other AIC agencies are each subjected to intensive and frequent review by this office, to ensure that they conduct their business within the bounds of the law, and in a professional and ethical manner. I can also assure you that the inspection regime undertaken by my office is very thorough.

You have also raised the possibility that a foreign intelligence service might be involved in the activities you described. ASIO has a functional interest in monitoring any such activity, and in turn my office closely examines ASIO’s activities in this area. On the basis of the material available to me, I do not believe that they are negligent in this regard.

I should also tell you that I do not have any jurisdiction over any foreign intelligence services, but despite this would regard it as highly improbable that they would target any member of the Australian public who is simply going about their ordinary business.

While I don’t doubt that you have experienced a range of issues that are of concern to you, none of the AIC agencies have the capabilities or motivation to do what you describe.

If you believe you have been the subject of a crime, you have the option of discussing this with your local police.

While my office is unable to directly assist you, I nonetheless hope that the above information is both helpful and reassuring to you.

On behalf of
Ian Carnell, Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security

Office of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security
P [phone] | F [phone] | www.igis.gov.au

[Vincent Peter Valerio]

I have reported criminal activity that is covert in nature and the county officials who perpetrate criminal activities are very professional in evading. The Attorney General Public Integrity Bureau Replied after several months.
The attached correspondence from me is one of many letter's and the only reponse is the attached Public Integrity Bureau Reply.
The other attachment I recieved today and though I should forward it along as well, It is a compilation or government responses to a Woman from Baltimore, Maryland.

Thanks,

Vincent