Worldwide Campaign to stop the Abuse and Torture of Mind Control/DEWs
If you are a non-consensual subject of a top secret and very cruel process known as Remote Neural Monitoring, when you hear a voice speaking to you , and that voice is coming from inside your head, you must always answer that voice in a way as to inform the speaker that you are a non-consensual and extremely unwilling subject of Remote Neural Monitoring and that you are now forced to hear their voice coming from illegally placed implants inside your head. If you always reply in this manner, the user of the Remote Neural Monitoring process who is illegally forcing their voice inside your head using what has come to be known as voice to skull technology, will never be able to deny to a criminal court at some future time that they were unaware that they were forcing their voice inside your head against your will. If a court case ever materialises out of this widely practiced criminal procedure of Remote Neural Monitoring which is always combined with another process known as Remote Neural Manipulation the voice to skull speaker could instead attempt to persuade the court to believe that they erroneously thought they were speaking to you via a loudspeaker.
My name is Gretta Fahey, from Newbrook, Claremorris, Co. Mayo, Ireland and I am a non-consensual subject of Remote Neural Monitoring and Remote Neural Manipulation and I have been thus for more than fifteen years. I believe that I have been non-consensually implanted with what could be bio implants and nano implants. I have been led to believe that either bio or nano technology has become lodged within the muscular structure of my body and also within my brain and spine and that a portion of these implants are two way receivers and transmitters of digital signals which are being used by criminals to force their voices inside my head and to force my muscles to move against my will by sending false digital signals to my motor cortex as well as my muscles, in a way as to attempt to permanently disable me, among other things.
I have recently been led to believe that there are at least two types of voice to skull speakers who regularly force their voices inside my head against my will and without my permission. The first group are duty staff voice to skull speakers who monitor all of my thoughts, words and actions around the clock continually and have been doing so for at least fifteen years. The second group are non duty staff voice to skull speakers who pay the salaries of the duty staff speakers and who themselves wirelessly harass the targeted individual of Remote Neural Monitoring and Remote Neural Manipulation whenever they wish. They are able to access all records that the duty staff keep on the targeted individual. These records are extremely extensive and have been compiled in extreme detail over more than years by a great many Remote Neural Monitoring neuro operatives who work at all university graduate levels, and none, who work in secret, and who would be imprisoned by the by now extremely immoral man-made law system if they ever revealed any details of their work to the wider world.
If one of the neuro operatives attempts to force their unwanted voice inside my head I sometimes reply by saying the following " Why have you forced your voice inside my head against my will and without my permission, due to the fact that you have been enabled to do so because nano and bio implants have been placed inside my head and body against my will and without my permission at a time when I was unaware it was happening." ? When I reply to the voice to skull speaker in this manner, a completely different voice to skull speaker who claimed to be a member of the Remote Neural Monitoring duty staff who I do not know and have never met, and who only knows the other voice to skull speaker by their unique energy signature , once informed me on a completely separate occasion, also via this illegal process of internal voice transmission , that the various voice to skull speakers other than the duty staff speakers recoil in anger due to the content of my reply because it exposes him or her as somebody who knows how they are speaking to the unwilling and non-consenting subject of Remote Neural Monitoring. This non-duty staff voice to skull speaker is being listened to by the duty staff who maintain permanent records of all of the non duty staff voice to skull speakers who force their voices inside the heads of targeted individuals of Remote Neural Monitoring, simply be keeping a record of the energy signature of the non duty staff voice to skull speaker on file for life. These non duty staff voice to skull speakers deem themselves as very important individuals and they would be disheartened to one day be found guilty of the cruel crime of using the cruel and secret Remote Neural Monitoring process to electronically harass and torture their fellow human beings in secret.