Worldwide Campaign to stop the Abuse and Torture of Mind Control/DEWs
This Full Length Research Paper has been published in Academic Journals
Soleilmavis’ case summary on mind control torture and abuse
Journal of Law and Conflict Resolution Vol. 4(2), pp. 27-30, February 2012
Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/JLCR
ISSN 2006-9804 ©2012 Academic Journals
One of the twenty-first century’s greatest violations of human rights is the proliferation of mind control technologies and their accompanying abuse and torture. The author, Soleilmavis Liu, is one of thousands of innocent victims across the globe, who has become an activist for their freedom. Mind control technologies are weapons which use electromagnetic waves to hijack a person’s brain and nervous system and subvert an individual's sense of control over their own thinking, behavior, emotions or decision making. This article is a brief introduction to these technologies and one of its victims, Soleilmavis Liu. Soleilmavis’ work is to expose mind control technologies and their torturous abuses and to urge governments worldwide to investigate and halt these egregious violations of human rights. Keywords: Mind control technology; Directed energy weapons; Human Rights; Torture; Abuse.
Keywords：Mind control technology; Directed energy weapons; Human Rights; Torture; Abuse
Soleilmavis is a Chinese citizen, born and raised in China, who was first attacked in December, 2001 when she was studying for a Master’s Degree in Australia. At the time she was unfamiliar with remote electromagnetic weapons which can control thinking, behavior, emotions or decision making by attacking the brain and nervous system. Eventually, she would come to learn of these technologies that are being secretly used or covered by governments worldwide to control and harass the populace.
This article will briefly introduce mind control weapons, Soleilmavis’ case summary, and Soleilmavis’ work to expose mind control weapons abuse torture. Soleilmavis’ case summary and her work will hopefully bring more public awareness to the use of mind control weapons, abuses and tortures.
2. Brief introduction of Mind Control Technologies
Mind control technologies are weapons which use electronic microchip implants, nanotechnologies, microwaves and /or electromagnetic waves to subvert an individual's sense of control over their own thinking, behavior, emotions or decision making by attacking the brain and nervous system. The development of these methods and technologies has a long history.
2.1 Nazi Wonder Drug
Nazi researchers used concentration camp inmates to test a cocaine-based "wonder drug" they hoped would enhance the performance of German troops. 
2.2 Mk-ultra, America's Central Intelligence Agency mind control project.
There is an overwhelming body of evidence that confirms the existence of Mk-ultra, America's Central Intelligence Agency mind control project. MORE than 250 people who claim they were “brainwashing” victims of America’s Central Intelligence Agency were set to win a multimilliondollar legal battle for compensation. Nine had already each received $67,000 (£33,500) compensation from the spy agency, which had admitted setting-up an operation codenamed MK-Ultra during the Cold War (Parker, 2007). 
2.3 Implantable electronic chip mind control
Many researchers, using nanotechnologies have developed implantable electronic chips that establish new nerve connections in the parts of the brain that control movement or even alter emotion and thought. Researchers at the University of Washington (UW) are working on an implantable electronic chip that may help establish new nerve connections in the part of the brain that controls movement. Their most recent study, to be published in the Nov. 2, 2006, edition of Nature, showed such a device can induce brain changes in monkeys lasting more than a week (Gray, 2006). 
On March 18, 2008, the Central Intelligence Agency responded in writing to a Larson Media Freedom of Information Act request. The document discloses that the CIA's use of biomedical intellectual property developed at the Alfred Mann Foundation, Second Sight LLC, Advanced Bionics, and under Naval Space Warfare (SPAWAR) contract #N6600106C8005 is "currently and properly classified pursuant to an executive order in the interest of national security" and applies to the CIA Director's "statutory obligation to protect from disclosure, intelligence sources and methods". The technology, developed under the DARPA programs of Tony Tether, Col. Geoffrey Ling and N.I.H programs of William Heetderks, has been protected as a Defense "Special Access Program"1 (SAP), which is the official terminology for a "black project". The research has resulted in implantable devices that are millimeter and sub-millimeter in size, can be surreptitiously implanted (and are fabricated in a manner that the devices cannot be detected or localized by clinical medical or radiology techniques), and provides a shocking amount of surveillance capability regarding a subject’s activities which may include visual and auditory biofeedback data.
Additionally, the devices are capable of delivering testosterone or any other biological agent.
2.4 Voice to Skull Technologies
Artificial microwave voice to skull transmission was successfully demonstrated by researcher Dr. Joseph Sharp in 1973, announced at a seminar from the University of Utah in 1974, and in a journal "American Psychologist" in March, 1975 issue, article title "Microwaves and Behavior" by Dr. Don Justesen (1975). 
In 2002, the US Air Force Research Laboratory patented precisely such a device: a nonlethal weapon which includes (1) a neuro-electromagnetic device which broadcasts sound into the skull of persons or animals by way of pulse-modulated microwave radiation; and (2) a silent sound device which can transmit ultrasound (above human hearing) into the skull of mammals.
NOTE: The sound modulation may be voice or audio subliminal messages. One application of Voice to Skull uses is an electronic scarecrow to frighten birds in the vicinity of airports. Many mind control victims also claim to be harassed by Voice to Skull technologies (http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/dod/vts.html ). 
2.5 Mind reading technologies
Researchers have shown a capability to read a subject’s mind by remotely measuring their brain activity. This technique can even extract information from individuals, who are unaware of themselves (http://blogs.wickedlocal.com/goodage/2011/02/24/harvards-buckner-wi... ) 
2.6 Microwave or electromagnetic mind control technologies
It is sometimes hard for victims to find evidence of microwave or electromagnetic mind control technology. However, some news articles are starting to report the development of government mind control weapons (DiSalvo, 2011).  There is evidence that electromagnetic weapons have effects on the brain; including sleep disruption and behavior changes (Walonick, 1999). 
2.7 Patents of Mind Control Technologies
Patents also indicate the existence of mind control technologies. 
3. SOLEILMAVIS’ CASE SUMMARY ON MIND CONTROL ABUSE AND TORTURE
Soleilmavis is a Chinese citizen, born and raised in China, who was first attacked in December, 2001 when she was studying for a Master’s Degree in Australia. Noticeable effects started with some noises (whispering voices) which she heard from the floor below her. The other people who lived in the same house could not hear them. She then moved to a one-story house in January, 2002. The noise resounded, as if they were coming from the neighbors. Soon she started to experience a wide variety of symptoms.
3.1 Major symptoms:
Majority of the symptoms were; pain all over the body, stomach pain, toothaches, headaches, and leg and arm pains, she also had a few high fevers. All these symptoms would disappear without any medical treatment, or sometimes, a pain would persist, even if she had strong medication.
She went to the police in January, 2002 to report that someone was following her and using technology to read her thoughts. She told the police that their voices sounded as if they came from the neighbors. The police responded that it was illegal to use mind-reading technologies in Australia.
In February, 2002, she moved to a new one-story house. An increase in the symptoms was noted: diarrhea for almost a month, involuntary hand tremors, inability to stand firmly on her legs, alternation of cold and hot sensations, excessive perspiration, and more. As usual, the symptoms disappeared, without any medication.
On April 5 2002, she could not bear any more suffering, so she left Australia .However, even after she left, she still could hear those voices. She went to Hong Kong, Thailand, Shanghai and China, but the voices still sounded as if they came from the neighbors. The same symptoms came back all the time and her belongings were often stolen when she was not in her hotels.
In August, 2002, she went to New Zealand. Again, she experienced the same symptoms. In April 2003, she had already spent all her money, so she came back to China and stayed with her parents. She had more symptoms such as constipation, faece and piss incontinence and sexual harassment. Torturers started to prevent her from sleeping at night, or they would wake her up at midnight. Sometimes, the tormentors also forced her to sleep when she did not want to or they would force her to have "dreams". She knew those "dreams" were totally artificial and transmitted to her brain via an external medium, presumably through electromagnetic weapons. The principle was the same as with a silent sound device which could transmit sounds into a person's skull.
At the end of 2004, her tormentors forced her to have "dreams" every night. These people could use electromagnetic technologies to transmit their voices directly to her brain. They could make their voices sound as if they came from the neighbors or from a nearby person. They could also use their devices to morph the voices to sound like those of her friends or family members. Upon her return to China, the voices still sounded as if they came from neighbors, but she knew they were not her neighbors' voices. After 2005, they no longer used the "voice trick", although sometimes they even tried to make her believe that they were the TV announcers' voices.
Upon her return to China, the voices still sounded as if they came from neighbors, but she knew they were not her neighbors' voices. After 2005, they no longer used the "voice trick", although sometimes they even tried to make her believe that they were the TV announcers' voices.
She thought that they mostly used their own voices. When they started to torture and harass her in Australia, most of them only spoke in English. Only one or two spoke in Mandarin without any dialects. During the second month, more people who spoke in Mandarin joined them. They also asked whether she could speak Cantonese. Other victims said they could hear the voices speaking in Cantonese. Since leaving Australia, most of the voices were only in Mandarin. About ten people who spoke Mandarin had been torturing and harassing her 24/7 between May 2002 and April 2003. After April 2003, about ten Mandarin voices were used and only occasional voices were in English. She thought they might have employed more Mandarin-speaking people to join them.
During the past few years, their weapons have attacked her, no matter where she was; in every country, whether inside a house, underground, on a plane, on a ship, underwater, inside a car, on a mountaintop or anywhere.
3.2 Soleilmavis’ efforts of the past few years
For the past few years, Soleilmavis has been working hard to stop these fascist atrocities. She reported these crimes to the police when she was in Australia in January and February, 2002. She wrote letters to the United Nations after she left Australia.
Since 2005, she has written letters to the United Nations, researched the Internet about mind control weapons and acquired lots of good information. She found many victims all over the world who were going through the same nightmarish life as her.
After 2006, she more intensely researched mind control and directed-energy weapons. She kept in touch with other victims and exposed mind control and directed energy technologies torturing and harassing her through many channels worldwide. She and others in her network have written countless letters to government departments, social communities, human rights organizations, the media and the general public. But they did not get any help to stop the alleged human rights violation.
Soleilmavis has also sent letters to, and wishes to file lawsuits against the government who has covered up mind control weapons abuses and tortures. Soleilmavis and other victims have started a concerted campaign against secret mind control weapons/directed energy weapons abuse and torture. They are demanding an international investigation into these crimes which constitute immense violations of the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights (http://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/mailteam-1). 
4. GOVERNMENT SHOULD TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION
The control and manipulation of a human brain is a terrifying possibility. Lieutenant Colonel Timothy L. Thomas, US Army (ret), published an article in the military journal Parameters which likens the mind as a new battlefield. He quotes a Russian army major in relation to weapons that affect the mind, “It is completely clear that the state which is first to create such weapons will achieve incomparable superiority." Thomas expresses concern about “information dominance” though he stops short of the moral implications (Thomas, 1998). 
Mr. Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton also have also raised high concern of human rights violations implemented with electromagnetic weapons in the article “US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights”( Phillips et al., 2006). 
According to an anonymous Survey for Mind Control Victims (result on 19 Dec 2009), 71.29% of all victims had completed a college degree, with 13.86% of all victims attaining a Master or a Doctor degree. The possible reasons to became a target were:
Currently, there are many victims who claim they are tortured and harassed by mind control and directed energy weapons, and the number of victims has been increasing. Victims of these weapons are often economically marginalized and therefore have very limited financial resources to buy testing equipment, so even if they are poisoned or get implanted or suffer from brutal electromagnetic weapons torture, for the most part, they cannot uncover the root causes or find someone willing to help them do so.
Many States’ Constitutions require the Government to protect the legitimate rights and interests of citizens; many countries had strict laws to ban torture; THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS bans torture, cruel inhuman degrading treatment or punishment (Article 5); and everyone has the right to freedom of thought (Article 18). But the Government and public have ignored victims’ complaints for years—they did not help victims or sentence torturers according to law.
It can be seen that mind control weapons are well developed and they are being used to torture and harass innocent citizens. Many victims are currently working in conjunction with Soleilmavis to start a worldwide campaign against secret mind control weapons/directed energy weapons abuse and torture.
In this research, the following conclusions were reached:
1) Many countries have developed various types of mind control methods: drugs, microchips, nanotechnologies and electromagnetic waves. Could these governments also introduce legislation to regulate the use of such weapons?
2) Effective laws and other measures from our governments need to be enacted to prevent the misuse
of such weapons.
3) In the event of misuse of such weapons, government intervention is required to protect the victims’ and prosecute torturers to the fullest extent of the law.
It is hoped that Soleilmavis’ case summary will bring about public awareness and solutions to mind control weapons abuse and torture.
 Nazi Wonder Drug, http://www.amphetamines.com/nazidrug.html , 9/11/2002
 Mike Parker, CIA'S BOURNE IDENTITY PLOT (Mkultra), Express.co.uk, July 8, 2007,
 Leila Gray, Tiny electronic chip, interacting with the brain, modifies pathways for controlling movement, University of Washington News, Oct. 24, 2006
 Dr. Don Justesen, Microwaves and Behavior, American Psychologist, March 1975,
 voice to skull devices http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/dod/vts.html accessed 17 Aug 2011
 Harvard’s Buckner wins Alzheimer’s award for reading our minds, 2011 February 24
 David DiSalvo, Five Big Developments in Neuroscience to Watch, Jun. 17 2011, Neuropsyched
 David S. Walonick, Effects of 6-10 Hz ELF on Brain Waves, September 10, 1999,
 Patents http://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/mind-control-patents accessed 17 Aug 2011
 Victims works http://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/mailteam-1 accessed 17 Aug 2011
 Timothy L. Thomas, The Mind Has No Firewall, Parameters, Spring 1998, pp. 84-92.
 Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton, US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights, December 2006,
 An anonymous Survey for Mind Control Victims (result on 19 Dec 2009)
The Fact and evidence
I was controlled by remote Voice to Skull technologies and Mind Control technologies, and I was brought inside US Embassy in Hong Kong
Life of Soleilmavis in Brief Summary
Some lawsuits filed by Soleilmavis
Many victims' stories