peacepink

Worldwide Campaign to stop the Abuse and Torture of Mind Control/DEWs

Some suggestions on how to file a court case.

The followings are some suggestions from lawyers, We welcome more good suggestions, please leave your comments to this post.

Some suggestions from France lawyers

Summary report of Mr. Rudy (France) meeting with the lawyers in Paris

Only 3 lawyers turned up, the other 3 were held up at their offices at the last moment and briefly chatted with us on the phone.

1. They all know about the existence of various tecnological means which violate the fundamental human rights of innocent people , they know the existence of non lethal weapons and of highly sophisticated psychological pressures.

2. They do not have the slightest doubt about some governments' participation in influencing or even destroying the free will of some people.

3. They know that the exposure of such practices usually provokes sniggering and those who dare to complain are either made fun of or accused of paranoia.
Paranoia , of course, does exist and as it is characterized by an excessive mistrust of other people's acts or an excessive mistrust of power, it affects every social relationship and makes it possible to justify exclusion .

4. Utmost rigour and precision are therefore required when exposing the attacks on the victims' integrity, privacy and freedom of thought by invisible means. .
It is only by building up impeccable fact-files supported by official reports and scientific studies that public opinion worldwide can be sensitized and made aware of the problem.
It is only under these conditions of rigour and precision that the 3 lawyers present will agree to put the case for the defence.

The 3 lawyers all agreed on the following points:
Our difficulty is that we have practically no legal evidence of the attacks, so we have to make do with:
a) statistics
b) similarities in symptoms and experiences
c) similarities of torture cases
d) existence of weapons'patents
e) existence of the technology patents for the use of V2K
f) complicity of a number of psychiatrists worldwide
G) the highly probable involvement of many governments ( two lawyers referred to the example of helicopters and said that not many people can afford to maintain aircrafts. Flights are logged and the airspace they are in is recorded).
September 13, 2008
add 1 point: the 3 lawyers think that our first help should come from the parliamentarians, because they are the ones who make the laws.

Suggestions from Mr. Bob who have good knowledge on COINTELPRO

(1) the necessary evidence for bringing a lawsuit with Universal Jurisdiction is to pursue a winning legal strategy that begins with the reopening of a COINTELPRO investigation and
(2) the appointment of an independent special counsel with subpoena powers for obtaining classified government documents that show a specific harm to a specific person by a specific federal agent.

USA Bill 1026 COINTELPRO
http://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/usa-bill-hres1026-cointelpro

Instructions for preparing a COINTELPRO statement
http://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/instructions-for-preparing-a


About Greg’s lawsuit with Stein and Stein

http://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/stein-and-stein-the-law-firm

From Bob S, JD, Retired Attorney

First, a Canadian law firm cannot represent in a Canadian court US citizens who have suffered harm in the US from a US federal agency. The Canadian court does not have jurisdiction over such a case, and Canadian lawyers are not authorized to undertake such representation in a US court.

Second, if the lawyers had agreed to take such a case, they would have written to greg explaining what they would try to do and for whom. Greg would send a copy of this letter instead of his own vague email.

Third, the MKULTRA evidence can't be used to prove CIA responsibility for new forms of experiments using entirely different technology today. We have no way of accessing new evidence of responsibility by ourselves or through an attorney or a private investigator. It can only be accessed by a congressional investigation or by an
appointed Independent Prosecutor. No legitimate attorney would make the false claim that a detective can get such classified evidence. If the detective could actually do this by some illegal means, he would be subject to severe criminal penalties.

 

Fourth, the claims of TI's are far too diversified to be lumped together in a class action law suit. Any attempt to do this would be dismissed by the court. No legitimate attorney would claim that a class action lawsuit would be an appropriate form of legal action for the TI situation.

Bob S, JD, Retired Attorney 

In a message dated 5/17/2011 6:40:15 A.

I just received another lawyers suggection on 24 May 2011,

Practices in US are not familiar to me. But basically location of court should follow the country of the victim. It is correct that US citizen can not go to court in Canada but must claim first all the processes in his home country. After that international courts are available based on international agreements or laws.

Basically evidences in court are here in Europe under various laws but itself court case here makes evidences and even non public materials more public for the case parties. It is universal law to have a right to know what concerns person's own matters. Others it makes quite impossible to audience parties in the court.
Related to possible illegal medical-type experiments, these materials should be public for the person they concern, also because of the court case. But in practice i see it quite demanding to go and ask these materials for public view. Also I can not say about evidence's hand out practical protocols in different countries, I am sure those vary country to country too much. Class action, I am not familiar. I know somehow group's right to make a group suit.
Here in Europe group suit must be based on law that qualifies the case. All cases can not be group cases.

The route to court or solution in mind control cases seems to me out of the court exercise, but of course it would be ideal to take people behind to the crimes to the court. Lets see how this kind of cases can come to public knowledge for masses.

 

Law says non-US citizens can still sue in US cvourts for torture:

http://www.slate.com/id/2100460/

Is Torture Against the Law?

What Uncle Sam has to say about it.


According to an article in today's New York Times, the CIA is using "coercive interrogation methods" against some al-Qaida suspects. The piece notes that "defenders of the operation said the methods … did not violate American anti-torture statutes." What U.S. laws are they referring to?

The federal anti-torture statute is formally known as Title 18, Part I, Chapter 113C of the U.S. Code. The law consists of three sections (2340, 2340A, and 2340B), which define the crime of torture and prescribe harsh punishments for anyone—an American citizen or otherwise—who commits an act of torture outside of the United States. (Domestic incidents of torture are covered by state criminal statutes.) A person found guilty of committing torture faces up to 20 years in prison or even execution, if the torture in question resulted in a victim's death.

The law was added to the books in 1994, as part of the United States' efforts to ratify and comply with the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman ... (more simply known as the CAT). The treaty was adopted by the United Nations in 1984, but not ratified by the U.S. Congress until a decade later. The CAT mandates that all parties to the treaty "take effective legislative, administrative, judicial, or other measures to prevent acts of torture in any territory under its jurisdiction."

Advertisement
Another section of the U.S. Code (Title 28, Part IV, Chapter 85, Section 1350) also deals with the issue of torture. The so-called Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991 allows victims of torture, or the families of those who were killed through extrajudicial means, to sue their tormentors in U.S. courts, regardless of their citizenship or where the crime occurred.

Both of these anti-torture statutes include identical, albeit imprecise, definitions of what constitutes torture. Among the proscribed actions are "the intentional infliction or threatened infliction of severe physical pain or suffering"; the use of "mind-altering substances"; and threats against other people, presumably family members.

Despite its efforts to adhere to the directives of the CAT, the United States has recently grumbled over the United Nations' efforts to add an inspection regime to the treaty. In 2002, the United Nations added an "optional protocol" to the CAT, requiring signatories to permit surprise inspections of their prisons. The United States has so far refused to sign, contending that the inspections would infringe on states' rights.

Suggestions from Joan Farr Heffington, C.E.O.
Association for Honest Attorneys
7145 Blueberry
Lane, Derby, Kansas 67037
Ph: 316.788.0901
316.788.7990
www.assocforhonestattys.com
We have read some of the dialog going on between TIs and legal counsel concerning the Bioethics Commission and wanted to offer our opinion. If this email does not reach all the TIs on your list, please forward...

From all indications, this commission is only to give the appearance that they are doing something about the illegal surveillance/ targeting of innocent people. Our research and substantial evidence shows that the targeting of innocent people (in any form, whether it's by microwave surveillance/microchips/steroid cocktail mix IVs in the hospital) is the result
of National Security Letters (NSLs) that were legalized under the Patriot Act in 2001. Anyone with connections to a Washington insider or your state governor/attorney general can have one issued against a person at any time for any reason. We have evidence to show that NSLs were delivered to hospitals three times in 2007 in the Wichita, Kansas area by CIA  operatives/Blackwater contractors stationed at McConnell Air Force Base (read Case # 3 on our website under "Supporting Documents" - one woman was killed in the hospital using the steroid cocktail mix I.V.) NSLs are also delivered to banks if they want to get
into your bank account, and this also flags employers not to hire you. Our research shows that anyone who fights the system in any way has an NSL against them. When a 22-year old boy working out at McConnell was targeted with H1N1 in Oct. 2009, we pushed for a Congressional inquiry and a false lawsuit was brought against me (personally) by our state attorney general for practicing law without a license. They do not want us to keep showing people how to file their own lawsuits because they know that numerous pro se suits are the only thing that works - they overload the system. You can talk til you're blue in the face, but a lawsuit is a written record that forces them to respond (if they don't, you win by default judgment). A guide is on our website under "How to File a Federal Suit" with TI claims similar to Case # 3. You can take it all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court by mail in three easy steps. Your best evidence is an affidavit from another TI who agrees with what happened to you, because it also happened to them. We have helped people with cases in the past and attached these as evidence, and this keeps the court from dismissing it as a frivolous suit. Don't let anyone tell you this is not good evidence - it is the BEST.
If what we are telling you is wrong, they wouldn't be trying so hard to put us out of business. But a top priority right now is to pressure your Congressmen/Senators to let the Patriot Act (or relevant portions) expire on May 27. Then they can no longer issue National Security Letters against innocent people. We also need a law in place, and that is why a
Congressional inquiry is needed. If enough lawsuits are threatened, this can force them to address the issue so it is covered by mainstream media, as it should be...

"The answer to world peace is to eliminate arrogance."

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Letter
USA PATRIOT Act
Once passed in 2001, section 505 of the USA PATRIOT Act greatly expanded the use of the NSL, allowing their use in scrutiny of US residents, visitors, or US citizens who are
not suspects in any criminal investigation. It also granted the privilege to other federal agencies, presumably to allow the department of
Homeland Security the same ability to use NSLs. In January 2007 the New York Times reported that both the Pentagon and the CIA have been issuing National Security Letters.[6] The USA PATRIOT Act reauthorization statutes passed during the 109th Congress added specific penalties for non-compliance or disclosure.

 

 "How to File a Federal Suit" at www.assocforhonestattys.com.
Case # 3 under "Supporting Documents" can be used as a template. 

 

how_to_submit_to_ICC.DOC

 

Lawyers who know mind control abuses and tortures

http://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/lawyers-who-know-mind-control

Views: 608

Comment by Soleilmavis on December 2, 2010 at 6:05pm
Comment by Soleilmavis on December 6, 2010 at 10:49am
From the following we know that without hard copy evidences, it is hard for victims to win their lawsuits in court.
US Supreme Court Justices reveal their ignorance regarding consumer technology, e.g., text messaging and pagers. This shows that they have no clue about abuses of technology and experimental weapons used to control humans. The FBI Director was and remains clueless about abuses of FBI informants who killed dozens of civilians, with the knowledge of special agents. Supervising police, prosecutors and politicians are unaware of widespread abuses of technology by their employees. They are happy to hear psychiatrists say that victims of criminal technological abuses are mentally ill. It preserves their image as
being knowledgeable of current events. They can pretend to know and not be bothered to learn about new abuses that they cannot see or understand. Official stupidity and negligence permits criminal abuses
to continue with no accountability to the government criminals.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/supreme_court_justices_demons...
Supreme Court justices demonstrate extreme lack of tech savvy
Comment by Soleilmavis on August 20, 2011 at 8:01am

Some questions we must understand if we want to sue government:

(1) Could individual (China citizen) sue several government in Europe Court of Human Rights?  (I had sent my letter to Europe Court of Human Rights to sue few government)

(2) Could group individuals (from many countries) sue one government? (in USA court or Europe court)

(3) Could group individuals (from many countries) sue few government? (in USA court or Europe court)

(4) Could individual USA victim file lawsuit in Europe court to sue USA government?

(5) Could individual USA victim file lawsuit in USA court to sue other government?

(6) Could individual non-USA victim file lawsuit in USA court to Sue USA government?

Please give your opinion of these basic questions.

Comment by Soleilmavis on August 22, 2011 at 2:45pm

law says non-US citizens can still sue in US cvourts for torture: 

http://www.slate.com/id/2100460/

Is Torture Against the Law?

What Uncle Sam has to say about it.

By |

 Posted Thursday, May 13, 2004, at 5:26 PM ET


Mohammed: Interrogated or tortured?

According to an article in today's New York Times, the CIA is using "coercive interrogation methods" against some al-Qaida suspects. The piece notes that "defenders of the operation said the methods … did not violate American anti-torture statutes." What U.S. laws are they referring to?

The federal anti-torture statute is formally known as Title 18, Part I, Chapter 113C of the U.S. Code. The law consists of three sections (2340, 2340A, and 2340B), which define the crime of torture and prescribe harsh punishments for anyone—an American citizen or otherwise—who commits an act of torture outside of the United States. (Domestic incidents of torture are covered by state criminal statutes.) A person found guilty of committing torture faces up to 20 years in prison or even execution, if the torture in question resulted in a victim's death.

The law was added to the books in 1994, as part of the United States' efforts to ratify and comply with the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman ... (more simply known as the CAT). The treaty was adopted by the United Nations in 1984, but not ratified by the U.S. Congress until a decade later. The CAT mandates that all parties to the treaty "take effective legislative, administrative, judicial, or other measures to prevent acts of torture in any territory under its jurisdiction."

Another section of the U.S. Code (Title 28, Part IV, Chapter 85, Section 1350) also deals with the issue of torture. The so-called Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991 allows victims of torture, or the families of those who were killed through extrajudicial means, to sue their tormentors in U.S. courts, regardless of their citizenship or where the crime occurred.

Both of these anti-torture statutes include identical, albeit imprecise, definitions of what constitutes torture. Among the proscribed actions are "the intentional infliction or threatened infliction of severe physical pain or suffering"; the use of "mind-altering substances"; and threats against other people, presumably family members.

Despite its efforts to adhere to the directives of the CAT, the United States has recently grumbled over the United Nations' efforts to add an inspection regime to the treaty. In 2002, the United Nations added an "optional protocol" to the CAT, requiring signatories to permit surprise inspections of their prisons. The United States has so far refused to sign, contending that the inspections would infringe on states' right

Comment by Soleilmavis on October 31, 2011 at 7:49am
Yes it does. ANY device or weapon that emits or directs energies to purposely incapacitate or disable an individual. That is a brief description of the State law of Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan and some other states.
To further define the abuse as other law definitions define it. Any mind altering directed energies in fact, disables and incapacitates a victim. This because the victim is not using their mental faculties of their own free will or the way they would if they were not subjected as a victim to other people's criminal abuse of directed energy technologies.
Then there is the breached safety aspect of over exposure to directed energy technologies as a non worker and non participant. That instantly makes us victims of a depraved and preplanned crime with criminal intent to injure, harm, and harass.
Because of the unlawful physical control of the above mentioned criminal acts from willing participants that are subjecting us victims to their criminal intent.
These acts are without a doubt, a form of slavery, war crimes, genocide, and other heinous crimes against humanity that are a grave breach of international conventions, convents, and laws.
So, they are not just the crimes of stalking an individual and unlawful surveillance with criminal intent to injure, harm, and harass
This is a very lucid group of indictable federal offenses that if found guilty, a person can and more than likely will face the death penalty, if not life in prison without the possibility of parole. That is the punishment that awaits the people that have victimized you, the other victims, and myself.
I hope you have a clearer direction of what we each need to get accomplished.
Good luck in the endeavor.
Robert LaBoudiere

Comment

You need to be a member of peacepink to add comments!

Join peacepink

Latest Activity

Alels liked maryduttonhughes's group UK supporters
43 minutes ago
Alels liked Soleilmavis's group Buddhists fight against Mind Control
45 minutes ago
Larry Lee Whitsitt posted a photo

SAM_6158

Black X forehead Best evidence electro-neuro mind control/DEW's me
3 hours ago
Robin Yan commented on Robin Yan's blog post Don't forward it right now .Please check everything.Let it fly for a while.I will tell you when to forward it.
4 hours ago
Robin Yan posted a blog post

Don't forward it right now .Please check everything.Let it fly for a while.I will tell you when to forward it.

UNUN Human RightsUN Human Rights CouncilInternational Bar AssociationHuman Rights WatchAmnesty International Amnesty International CanadaInternational Human Rights Community International Criminal CourtCanadian GovernmentsEarlier, I shared one photo with International Criminal Court, which was one page of Toronto Police's report,  of which  Toronto police, Canadian torturers are afraid  and hack. Now, I provide International Criminal Court with two more photos. One was from Mr. Attorney General…See More
4 hours ago
Alels updated their profile
5 hours ago
deca posted videos
6 hours ago
deca commented on Oskar's video
Thumbnail

2017 - THE END OF ELECTRONIC HARASSMENT SYMPTOMS - END YOUR TARGETING SYMPTOMS

"so the method in the video does not stop targeting .....so why claim it does  ??????"
8 hours ago

Badge

Loading…

© 2017   Created by Soleilmavis.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service