This is evident for everybody: the stalking and bullying at education institutions is increasing all around the world, and even if the was some sort of "concern" , it only exposes the society enormous failure to approach both.
Just from reviewing the bullying issue we can determine why stalking is so successful, as the usual suggestions are matter of "coping" instead of addressing the "initiators" behavior. For example, I read about a person being bullied at school and the school never helping him, but after a school shooting spree his classmates reported him because they thought he could do the same, and he got suspended. No bullying/harassment ever stopped, and the only concern was that he could snap and attack his classmates, not the bullying nor it's psychological effect.
In my opinion this situation is similar to organized stalking, usually there isn't an identifiable individual or group of individuals over long term, but the target gets pushed into an unmanageable situation due to physical and psychological stress. In the end the perpetrator who is holding on the abuse against the victim, blames the target to possibly act or attack them (who knows, maybe even the unusual encounters with the police are less of a convicted criminal and more a "we abused and abuse this person and he/she might snap one of these days", but I believe it might be both). Whenever we talk about murderous TIs (those who seem to hurt others because "they are perps") we are bringing this stigma all over us considering that there isn't clear evidence to prove the TI testimony, well the product of these claims will be more articles about "delusional people claiming directed energy weapons and organized stalking who are also dangerous and kill people". As I stated before, turning the victim into a perpetrator, and when the tables seem to turn the perpetrator "new victim" WILL have the evidence of the TI retaliation, unlike us, as testimonies and anecdotes have a null value in court (unless we have actual evidence, which is ideal). This scum attempts to create both perpetrators and victims to destroy individuals, and we shouldn't play their game.
We shouldn't forget that we are surviving to stop these fucking criminals, and we should start being more observers than victims, as strange as that sounds, to determine the best social strategy to solve an issue without letting the perps destroy our "public person". This is useless against electronic harassment which only leaves our health to shielding, but believe it or not, social interaction might either provide us the credibility we need, or condemn us as usual. We are isolated everyday, usually by our own will, so the possibilities to resist smearing or gossips is almost null for us.
And to be clear, I'm not suggesting we should cope with the abuse, but cope the best we can with our social environment to protect ourselves, and I'm saying this after leaving emergency room due to unidentified hearth problems after an electronic harassment increase.