lie - Blogs - Peacepink32024-03-19T04:57:46Zhttps://peacepink.ning.com/blog/feed/tag/lieTHE VATICAN ARE EXPERTS IN MIND CONTROL.https://peacepink.ning.com/blog/the-vatican-are-experts-in-mind-control2020-08-12T06:09:11.000Z2020-08-12T06:09:11.000ZGretta Faheyhttps://peacepink.ning.com/members/GrettaFahey<div><div><div class="l6v480f0 maa8sdkg s1tcr66n aypy0576 ue3kfks5 pw54ja7n uo3d90p7 l82x9zwi tvfksri0 ozuftl9m"><div><div class="f10w8fjw"><div><div class="ecm0bbzt hv4rvrfc e5nlhep0 dati1w0a"><div class="j83agx80 cbu4d94t ew0dbk1b irj2b8pg"><div class="qzhwtbm6 knvmm38d"><div class="kvgmc6g5 cxmmr5t8 oygrvhab hcukyx3x c1et5uql ii04i59q"><div>The Vatican are experts in psychology. It is essential to them that they are experts in psychology in order to keep their estimated two billion followers from ever thinking logically. If their followers ever began to think logically they would then have no followers and no more money flowing into their coffers. In order to render their followers into a state of unquestioning obedience and subservience they covertly use electronic mind control on school children. However, when I was a child before electronic mind control came into widespread use the Vatican used trauma based mind control on school children. We used to be beaten with canes if we could not answer a question when asked by the school teacher. School teachers were trained in catholic teacher training colleges to be absolutely authoritarian. The trauma based mind controlled school children then grew up with an extreme fear of false authority and were afraid to raise their head above the radar and were also afraid to question church and state. The Vatican through the Catholic church system also urged parents to raise their children by using the authoritarian parenting style. The Vatican manipulated parents to lie to their children about Santa Clause in order to break all trust between parent and child so that they child could never trust the parent again. This lie is profoundly devastating to the mental health of the child. Up until recently trauma based mind control tactics such as caning were still being used in African schools because the electronic mind control infrastructure which would allow for mind controlling the African children had still not been erected in Africa. Please distrust the Vatican. They are a corporation which is primarily a business concern.</div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><div><div class="stjgntxs ni8dbmo4 l82x9zwi uo3d90p7 h905i5nu monazrh9"><div><div><div class="a8nywdso e5nlhep0 rz4wbd8a ecm0bbzt dhix69tm oygrvhab wkznzc2l kvgmc6g5 k7cz35w2 jq4qci2q j83agx80"><div class="l9j0dhe7 k4urcfbm"><div class="l9j0dhe7"><div class="oajrlxb2 bp9cbjyn g5ia77u1 mtkw9kbi tlpljxtp qensuy8j ppp5ayq2 goun2846 ccm00jje s44p3ltw mk2mc5f4 rt8b4zig n8ej3o3l agehan2d sk4xxmp2 rq0escxv nhd2j8a9 j83agx80 mg4g778l btwxx1t3 pfnyh3mw p7hjln8o kvgmc6g5 cxmmr5t8 oygrvhab hcukyx3x tgvbjcpo hpfvmrgz jb3vyjys rz4wbd8a qt6c0cv9 a8nywdso l9j0dhe7 i1ao9s8h esuyzwwr gokke00a du4w35lb lzcic4wl abiwlrkh p8dawk7l buofh1pr taijpn5t"><div class="e71nayrh _18vj">Like</div></div></div></div><div class="oajrlxb2 g5ia77u1 qu0x051f esr5mh6w e9989ue4 r7d6kgcz rq0escxv n05y2jgg hbms080z p7hjln8o kvgmc6g5 cxmmr5t8 oygrvhab hcukyx3x jb3vyjys rz4wbd8a qt6c0cv9 a8nywdso i1ao9s8h vul9dhcy f1sip0of lzcic4wl l9j0dhe7 abiwlrkh p8dawk7l f49446kz _666h _18vj _18vk">Comment</div><div class="oajrlxb2 bp9cbjyn g5ia77u1 mtkw9kbi tlpljxtp qensuy8j ppp5ayq2 goun2846 ccm00jje s44p3ltw mk2mc5f4 rt8b4zig n8ej3o3l agehan2d sk4xxmp2 rq0escxv nhd2j8a9 j83agx80 rj1gh0hx btwxx1t3 pfnyh3mw p7hjln8o kvgmc6g5 cxmmr5t8 oygrvhab hcukyx3x tgvbjcpo hpfvmrgz jb3vyjys rz4wbd8a qt6c0cv9 a8nywdso l9j0dhe7 i1ao9s8h esuyzwwr f1sip0of du4w35lb lzcic4wl abiwlrkh p8dawk7l buofh1pr k7cz35w2 taijpn5t ms05siws flx89l3n ogy3fsii"><div class="rq0escxv l9j0dhe7 du4w35lb j83agx80 pfnyh3mw taijpn5t bp9cbjyn owycx6da btwxx1t3"><div class="rq0escxv l9j0dhe7 du4w35lb j83agx80 cbu4d94t d2edcug0 p8fzw8mz"></div><div class="rq0escxv l9j0dhe7 du4w35lb j83agx80 cbu4d94t d2edcug0"><span class="oi732d6d ik7dh3pa d2edcug0 qv66sw1b c1et5uql a8c37x1j muag1w35 enqfppq2 jq4qci2q a3bd9o3v lrazzd5p m9osqain ni8dbmo4 stjgntxs ltmttdrg g0qnabr5">Share</span></div></div><div class="n00je7tq arfg74bv qs9ysxi8 k77z8yql i09qtzwb n7fi1qx3 b5wmifdl hzruof5a pmk7jnqg j9ispegn kr520xx4 c5ndavph art1omkt ot9fgl3s"></div></div></div></div><div class="cwj9ozl2 tvmbv18p"></div></div></div></div></div>A KILLER GRID ELECTRIC FENCE WOULD SURROUND SMART CITY RESERVATIONS.https://peacepink.ning.com/blog/a-killer-grid-electric-fence-would-surround-smart-city2019-05-22T09:07:49.000Z2019-05-22T09:07:49.000ZGretta Faheyhttps://peacepink.ning.com/members/GrettaFahey<div><p>If we ever become locked inside a killer grid electric fence which would some day surround all smart city reservations we would then no longer be able to demolish the electrical infrastructure which is slowly and incrementally enabling our technological enslavement. Act now to ensure the freedom of your children.</p><p>Many individuals have already become secretly tethered by wireless means to a computerized control and enslavement network by technology which has become embedded deeply inside their brains and spines. We now know for definite that this human computerized control and enslavement system is run by dark occultists. We are at a critical stage in this secret worldwide war of attrition. You must help by spreading awareness of the current dangerous situation which is happening in secret throughout most of the world. I have already become wirelessly connected to this human computerized control and enslavement system by a two way stream of energy, where all of the electrical activity being generated by my brain and body is being automatically translated into what I think, say and do by the computer network. Teams of operatives issue commands to me as well as death threats on an almost continual basis. This system could eventually be automated so that commands and punishments would be fully automated. This system could eventually be automated to automatically connect everybody who already has embedded technology deep inside their bodies and brains which I believe is everyone.</p><p>Many individuals throughout Ireland and the rest of the world have already become wirelessly connected to the afore mentioned computerized control and enslavement network. Whenever we inform the police or any other government control agents we are deliberately not taken seriously and we are then sent for forced psychiatric evaluation which may or may not lead to incarceration inside a long stay psychiatric institution. That is why anybody who has already become wirelessly connected to said computerized control and enslavement system now stays away from all involvement with church and state and would invoke the right to remain silent if questioned about this situation.</p><p>Cover stories are being used to provide a reason from secret advances in technology especially in the area of brain weapon research. Some of these false cover stories include the extra-terrestrial hoax, the religious apparition hoax, the demonic possession hoax, the existence of satellites hoax, the moon landing hoax and many other hoaxes. It is being claimed that all of the astronauts were high level freemasons who are obliged to lie in public when ordered to do so by their control system.</p><p>My name is Gretta Fahey. I reside at Newbrook, Claremorris, Co. Mayo, Republic of Ireland. My landline home phone number is 0949360901. My website is called <a href="http://www.targetedindividualsireland.net">www.targetedindividualsireland.net</a>. My facebook page is <a href="http://www.facebook.com/gretta.fahey.98">www.facebook.com/gretta.fahey.98</a>.</p></div>THE DIVIDE AND CONQUER STRATEGY IS BEING USED AGAINST US.https://peacepink.ning.com/blog/the-divide-and-conquer-strategy-is-being-used-against-us2018-11-09T10:37:48.000Z2018-11-09T10:37:48.000ZGretta Faheyhttps://peacepink.ning.com/members/GrettaFahey<div><p>The new world order cabal have been using the strategy of "divide and conquer" in order to gain power over families, communities, nations and the whole human race. They have attempted to break down the family unit by many and varied subtle means. They have used both church and state to push their agenda. Most agents of church and state can not see the big picture.</p><p>Many decades ago before electronic mind control took over, trauma based mind control was used by schools and churches. The clergy urged parents to severely physically discipline their children on the understanding that if the children were not totally obedient to the teaching of the church they would burn in hell for all eternity and the parents might also burn in hell for not disciplining the children enough. Many parents believed this dictate because there was no conflicting information allowed into circulation via the main stream media at the time. This practice alienated many children from their parents.</p><p>Parents were also encouraged to lie to their children when the children were at a vulnerable age where they needed to totally trust their parents for reasons of survival. Parents forced the Santa Clause lie and the Tooth Fairy lie on their children so that the children could never fully trust their parents again in the future. This also served to inculcate the children into the belief that it is acceptable to be dishonest.</p><p>The main stream media attempted to break down strong family units through promoting promiscuity in magazines which were published for teenagers.</p><p>Church and state encouraged parents to send children to school when the children had turned four years old. A childs mind can be compared to liquid which does not set into a solid mind set until the age of seven on average. When the state has access to the minds of children before the age of seven agents of the state can easily inculcate the child into a heirarchical based mind set to the extent that the child becomes unable to challenge false authority in adulthood and in this way they can allow themselves to be enslaved.</p><p>The new world order cabal is actively building conflict between ethnic groups in Ireland at the moment. They have achieved this by first of all enacting unfair laws in favour of the travelling community so as to set up the travelling community as a hate group. They then subtly inflame hatred against the travelling community in a process where they use gradualism and incrementalism to achieve their aims. I believe that many travellers are being subjected to remote neural monitoring because I heard of one travelling family where four members committed suicide within a short space of time. The travelling community are difficult to control because they constantly move around, which is their birth right. The new world order cabal wish to rigidly control and eventually enslave all of us. They may wish to eliminate the travelling community entirely. In order to solve this situation, we aught to set up motor home parking facilities which we all can use at the edge of each town for the purposes of taking vacations, and which the travelling community can use for the purposes of continuing their nomadic lifestyle. In that way, we can befriend and integrate with the travelling community and protect them from hate groups.</p><p> </p></div>#1110 Bioethic blog Read your mind? Not in a ‘million light years’https://peacepink.ning.com/blog/1110-bioethic-blog-read-your2011-03-17T23:31:39.000Z2011-03-17T23:31:39.000Ztreelaw45 TIhttps://peacepink.ning.com/members/treelaw45TI<div>#1110 Bioethic blog Read your mind? Not in a ‘million light years’<br /><br /><a href="http://blog.bioethics.gov/2011/02/28/read-your-mind-not-in-a-%E2%80%98million-light-years%E2%80%99/">http://blog.bioethics.gov/2011/02/28/read-your-mind-not-in-a-%E2%80%98million-light-years%E2%80%99/</a><br /><br /> A, "million light years", is not an answer that describes time. Included at the bottom are comments, mine included. Peter Rosenholm<br /><br />blog.Bioethics.gov<br /><br />The blog of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues<br />Read your mind? Not in a ‘million light years’<br />Written by John Donnelly on February 28, 2011 — 8 Comments<br /><br />The members of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues received a primer today on recent advances in the use of medical technology on neuro-imagery. It was a session that Dr. Gregory House of the TV show House would have found fascinating – especially the multiple uses of MRI machines to help detect hard-to-diagnosis diseases.<br /><br />The Commission is considering whether to embark on examining ethical issues surrounding the uses of neuro-imagery and genetic testing.<br /><br />A panel of scientists said that one cutting-edge ethical issue now involves how private companies could use this technology for what they called “neuro-marketing” in order to advance the sale of products.<br /><br />But one issue not on the table: whether new technology can help read minds — because it can’t.<br /><br />Such technology “is a million light years away,” said Dr. Martha Farah, the Walter H. Annenberg Professor in Natural Science and Director of the Center for Cognitive Neuroscience at the University of Pennsylvania.<br /><br />Science isn’t close to enabling researchers to read the thoughts of others, Farah said in an interview. Still, though, she knows people fear that it will happen. She said she gets asked about it frequently.<br /><br />“We are nowhere near being able to read sentences or thoughts that are the equivalent of sentences,” Farah said. “But it is the case that we can derive a fair amount of personal information including current mental states, such as mood, intentions, and desire to buy an object” from Functional MRIs, or fMRIs.<br /><br />But the interpretation of brain imagery, captured in fMRIs, was far from perfect, she said. “There is a lot of significant personal information from fMRIs. It is with a degree of accuracy that is far from perfect, but is well above chance.”<br /><br />That leads Farah to be wary of neuro-marketing. “The biggest ethical issue to me is the fact that many of the most exciting new applications of brain imaging are being developed entirely with private corporate funding for commercial purposes,” she said. “I don’t think that is going to give us the best new contributions to society, and I don’t think that is going to lead to the greatest transparency concerning what these scans can do.”<br />Posted in Liveblog Coverage | Tagged Dr. Gregory House, Dr. Martha Farah, neuro-marketing, Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, reading minds, TV show House<br />8 Comments to “Read your mind? Not in a ‘million light years’”<br /><br />You can follow all the replies to this entry through the comments feed.<br /><br /> 1.<br /> sc's Gravatar sc<br /> March 1, 2011 at 1:33 pm | Permalink<br /><br /> I believe that it is critically important to consider the ramifications of issues such as these preemptively. While it may not be exactly hyperbolic to state that we are “nowhere near being able to read … thoughts,” as soon as a company thinks this is a worthy goal and starts to invest heavily in it, the growth will be rapid.<br /><br /> I do not believe that anyone should at all suggest that this is an impossible endeavor, unfortunately. Just because our current imaging technologies are not up to the task does not mean that a more sensitive measure, or a paradigm shifting one, may not be on the horizon.<br /><br /> I would agree that we are relatively far from such technology, but with the current accelerations of technological growth and neuroscience understanding, it would not be surprising to see within the next 50 years.<br /><br /> Also, a light year is a measure of distance and not time. So, unless there is a suggestion that no one within a radius of 9.4×10^21 m has access to this technology, then that quote may have been given in error.<br /> Reply<br /> *<br /> Martha Farah's Gravatar Martha Farah<br /> March 1, 2011 at 6:24 pm | Permalink<br /><br /> Hello and thanks for the reasonable comments. I agree that one should never discount the possibility of a “paradigm shift,” but I feel confident that the extrapolation of current brain imaging methods will not get us there. And given concerns about mind reading with current technology expressed by some members of the public in attendance, it seemed worth making the point in loud & clear terms. There is some impressive work being done to read mental information from the brain. But relative to real mind-reading, it’s like climbing trees to get to the moon — you can make some progress away from the ground and toward the moon, but only so far. Speaking of celestial bodies, I was using a distance analogy — we’re nowhere close, we’re light years away — but it did get lost in quotation! Thanks again for your thoughts. Martha<br /> Reply<br /> 2.<br /> tmk81's Gravatar tmk81<br /> March 2, 2011 at 12:18 pm | Permalink<br /><br /> Just because public research is far from mind reading doesn’t mean it is not being done… clandestinely. Even Leon Panetta, the director of the CIA, admits “Our biggest problem has always [been] how do we get into the head of somebody”. Note the word BIGGEST. It’s narrow views like those of Dr. Martha Farah that have been leading society to be caught with its pants down.<br /> Reply<br /> 3.<br /> Gary D Chance's Gravatar Gary D Chance<br /> March 3, 2011 at 4:46 pm | Permalink<br /><br /> The use of language here is extremely important. There’s a skip from neuroimaging to science with the conclusion derived from neuroimaging applied on the broader level of science. There is a whole other area of neuroscience involving detecting and decoding electrical impulses which was not even discussed at all. Neuroimaging fundamentally measures mass which limits what can be done with respect to brain research drastically.<br /><br /> Although we saw the letter “M” on the back of the brain by neuroimaging techniques where sight images are processed, we did not see any neurological work that reflected decoding electrical impulses such as was reported by the BBC News in 1999 where the ability to look through a cat’s eyes was accomplished: <a href="http://bbc.in/gQyBtJ">http://bbc.in/gQyBtJ</a> The Commission has utterly failed to bring to the surface this aspect of neuroscience today.<br /><br /> I make a similar analogy between mind reading today versus the inadequacy of neuroimaging to accomplish this at all. There has been a lack of any consideration given by the Commission to that branch of neuroscience which decodes electrical impluses that would reveal thoughts (words, sentences and images). This is completely different from neuroimaging.<br /><br /> I am quite concerned about this dismissal which is valid for neuroimaging being used on a broader basis when applied to science or other areas of neuroscience. My concern comes from the facts of my experience for the past decade where those people well known to me using neuroscience based surveillance technology have been able to read my thoughts (words, sentences and images) and repeat back to me what I am thinking by means of electronic transmission of sound, aka, Voice-to-Skull (V2K) so called by the US Army. I will go one step further and say that thoughts can be made audible in this manner, so that what one thinks in terms of words and sentences come out of a speaker because I hear my thoughts through S2K on a slight delay basis.<br /><br /> Those among the 22 public speakers at the end who reported the same experiences from various parts of the US that I have experienced in London revealed that this exists on a global basis and is being carried out as experiments on non-consensual human subjects as these people repeatedly described while they pleaded for help from the Commission to save their lives.<br /><br /> John Donnelly wrote “But one issue not on the table: whether new technology can help read minds — because it can’t.” This is the language problem. “New technology” is limited to neuroimaging when the Commission did not even consider other areas of neuroscience such as decoding the brain’s electromagnetic radiation emissions. “Science isn’t close to enabling researchers to read the thoughts of others, Farah said in an interview.” continues John Donnelly. Again this is a language usage fallacy. One cannot extrapolate a narrow area of research and application to a broader base.<br /><br /> The Commission has done itself and the public a great disservice by not considering all aspects of neuroscience or even science that might be applicable. I think that the Commission needs to go back to this area and do it justice by a thorough review of the current state of neuroscience that takes in decoding electrical impulses of the brain. What is actually being done is far, far from what is being presented by this Commission so far. This hole needs to be filled in, and those who speak from the public listened to very carefully. They are at the forefront of abuse by research.<br /> Reply<br /> 4.<br /> Derek D. Brodie's Gravatar Derek D. Brodie<br /> March 4, 2011 at 12:24 pm | Permalink<br /><br /> Pesonally if an individual was to actually try to read another individuals mind I believe it would entail this process. Find the vibratory frequency of the tissue of said subjects brain. Then pass that frequency at a low level through said tissue. Being received on the other side of said subjects head the frequency could then be analyzed for distortion due to electrical field functioning in brain processes. If the electrical field of the brain can be mapped. Then an individuals brain can be read by the fluctuations of said fields. Personal opinion not researched.<br /> Reply<br /> 5.<br /> Peter Rosenholm's Gravatar Peter Rosenholm<br /> March 4, 2011 at 5:36 pm | Permalink<br /><br /> Session 3 of Bioethics Commission<br /><br /> <a href="http://tinyurl.com/4t67woe">http://tinyurl.com/4t67woe</a><br /><br /> At about 45 minutes into this Session 3 video of the bioethics Commission Lisa Becker asks a question and in Dr. Farah’s response she says subvocal speech recognition is only speech and not mind reading. If knowing a subjects unspoken thoughts is not mind reading then what is mind reading.<br /><br /> I have written on how millimeter wave surveillance that measure heart and breathing rates as well as sweating as being used in concert with V2K/MEDUSA (microwave hearing effect) as being used as a remote lie detector or to enhance remote no-touch-torture using other directed energy weapons. We need to consider emergent and current technology as being components of a weapons system.<br /> Another example might be to stimulate a part of the brain to bring up a memory. Subvocal speech recognition could be used to read the subjects unspoken thought. Similar results might be obtained with brain imaging/FMRI.<br /> No longer can one technology be considered just by its self.<br /><br /> Peter Rosenholm<br /> Reply<br /> 6.<br /> Jeff's Gravatar Jeff<br /> March 4, 2011 at 6:13 pm | Permalink<br /><br /> <a href="http://deepthought.newsvine.com/_news/2010/07/13/4656599-can-a-satellite-read-your-thoughts-physics-revealed">http://deepthought.newsvine.com/_news/2010/07/13/4656599-can-a-satellite-read-your-thoughts-physics-revealed</a><br /> Reply<br /> 7.<br /> jameskdom's Gravatar jameskdom<br /> March 9, 2011 at 3:33 am | Permalink<br /><br /> Neuroscientists are already able to read some basic thoughts, like whether an individual test subject is looking at a picture of a cat or an image with a specific left or right orientation. They can even read pictures that you’re simply imagining in your mind’s eye. Even leaders in the field are shocked by how far we’ve come in our ability to peer into people’s minds. Will brain scans of the future be able to tell if a person is lying or telling the truth? Suggest whether a consumer wants to buy a car? Reveal our secret likes and dislikes, or our hidden prejudices? While we aren’t there yet, these possibilities have dramatic social, legal and ethical implications… <a href="http://tinyurl.com/l7z8ry">http://tinyurl.com/l7z8ry</a></div>#1094 Bioethics Commission off camera observationshttps://peacepink.ning.com/blog/1094-bioethics-commission-off2011-03-04T21:52:49.000Z2011-03-04T21:52:49.000Ztreelaw45 TIhttps://peacepink.ning.com/members/treelaw45TI<div>#1094 Bioethics Commission off camera <span>observations</span><br /><br /> If you watch the <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_0">Bio ethics commission</span> you will see these people talk all about this subject at length and yet dance around many subjects or details. <span style="border-bottom:2px dotted #366388;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_1">Dr. Amy Gutmann</span> started the Commission saying that clearly the G<span>uatemalan</span> tests were wrong and there will be no debating that non-consensual <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_2">human experimentation</span>, "is wrong". Everyone of the sitting commettee members agreed. Still Dr. Farah a speaker denied subvocal speech recognition is mind reading when asked by the Chair Dr. amy Gutmann. They broke after this exchange between DR. Farah and the Dr. Amy Gutmann. I then walked up to them as Dr. Gutmann walked away say, "We will discuss this later". I don't think she was happy with Dr. Farah twisting the truth. I then spoke to Dr. Farah who denied knowing about millimeter wave surveillance and V2K. I explained how they are used as a remote <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_3">lie detector</span>, but she claimed to know nothing about it.<br /> You will then see Dr. Farah push for brain imaging or FMRI to be used as a <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_4">lie detector</span> in her closing remarks. Dr. Gutmann then points out that brain imaging for <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_5">lie detection</span> is only 90% accurate. She states that that would mean 10% of the innocent people would be found guilty who were innocent and 10% of the criminals would walk away.<br /> I want you to look deeper and see that the Chair Dr. Amy Gutmann is the eighth president of the, "<span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_6">University of Pennsylvania</span>". She is the Boss of a few of these people at this meeting. They very likely have had these areas of contention for some time.<br />Dr. Farah also of the, "University of Pennsylvania" is the Director, Center for <span style="border-bottom:2px dotted #366388;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_7">Cognitive <span>Neuroscience</span></span> and and the Director for the Center for Neuroscience and society: as well as senior Fellow, Center for Bioethics. If you are catching on it has been these peoples jobs to look at the ethics of looking into our brain...........At the University of Pennsylvania!<br /> On the legal side and also from, "<span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_8">University of Pennsylvania Law <span>school</span></span> and School of Medicine. was <span style="border-bottom:2px dotted #366388;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_9">Dr. Stephen Morse</span>, J.D., Ph.D. Professor of <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_10">Psychology</span> and Law in <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_11">Psychiatry</span>.<br /> To Top off the list Dr. Moreno was in attendance also from the, "University of Pennsylvania". I asked him about using millimeter wave with V2K as a lie detector. He said he didn't know of the technology so I said, It is, "Voice to Skull", the, "Voice of God Weapon", "MEDUSA", "The Microwave Hearing Effect", "The F<span>rey</span> Effect"..." He said Oh I think I heard of that one. He then left. <br /> I'm unsure of how this will end. Billions are being made on the non-consensual <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_12">human experiments</span> done on us. <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_13">National security</span> is a good excuse to not speak about some things but clearly they are denying subjects that are not a national security issue like MEDUSA and its microwave hearing effect, The Army listed V2K on one of its sites till it was curriusly taken off. "Subvocal", was meantioned as, "Mind Reading" and I credit Dr. Amy Gutmann the Chair for actually bring that up. Then though Dr. Farah says it is not mind reading it is just muscles that twitch to the unspoken thought, and that mind control is a million years away. Clearly the desire for federal grants, power and control is stering this commission away from the truth or at least the whole truth.<br /> As we the TIs were speaking a man and Dr. Moreno were standing over by the door way and Ken Rhoades over heard the undisclosed man say, "They are catching on".<br /><br /><a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_D._Moreno"><span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_14">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_D._Moreno</span></a><br /><br />"Moreno has been a senior staff member for two presidential commissions and has given invited testimony for both houses of Congress.<br /><br />In 2005, Moreno joined the faculty at Penn as part of President <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_15">Amy Gutmann</span>’s Penn Integrates Knowledge (PIK) Initiative.<br /><br />Moreno is the editor or author of 17 books including:<br /><br /> * Progress in Bioethics: Science, Policy, and Politics, (MIT Press, 2010) ISBN <span style="border-bottom:2px dotted #366388;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_16">9780262134880</span><br /> * Science Next: Innovation for the <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_17">Common Good</span> from the <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_18">Center for American Progress</span>, (Bellevue Literary Press, 2009) ISBN <span style="border-bottom:2px dotted #366388;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_19">1934137189</span><br /> * Mind Wars: Brain Research and National Defense, (Dana Press, 2007) ISBN <span style="border-bottom:2px dotted #366388;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_20">1 932594167</span> [6]<br /> * Ethical Guidelines for Innovative Surgery, (<span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_21">University Publishing Group</span>, 2006) ISBN <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_22">1555720439</span><br /> * Is There an Ethicist in the House?: On the Cutting Edge of Bioethics, (<span style="background:transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_23">Indiana University Press</span>, 2005) ISBN <span style="border-bottom:2px dotted #366388;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_24">0253346355</span><br /> * Ethics in Clinical Practice, (Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Second Edition, 2004) ISBN <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_25">0763729450</span><br /> * In the Wake of Terror: Medicine and Morality in a Time of Crisis, (MIT Press, 2004) ISBN <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_26">0262633027</span><br /> * Ethical and Regulatory Aspects of Clinical Research: Readings and Commentary, (<span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_27">Johns Hopkins University Press</span>, 2003) ISBN <span style="border-bottom:2px dotted #366388;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_28">0801878136</span><br /> * Undue Risk: Secret State Experiments on Humans, (Routledge, 2000) ISBN <span style="border-bottom:2px dotted #366388;background:transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_29">0415928354</span><br /> * Deciding Together: Bioethics and Moral Consensus (<span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_30">Oxford University Press</span>, 1995) ISBN <span style="border-bottom:2px dotted #366388;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_31">019509218X</span><br /> * Arguing <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_32">Euthanasia</span>: The Controversy Over Mercy Killing, Assisted Suicide, And The "Right To Die", (Touchstone, 1995) ISBN <span style="border-bottom:2px dotted #366388;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_33">0684807602</span><br /><br />Selected articles<br /><br /> * "Embracing Military <span style="border-bottom:2px dotted #366388;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_34">Medical Ethics</span>," <span style="border-bottom:2px dotted #366388;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_35">American Journal of Bioethics</span>, 2008, 8(2): 1-3 [1]<br /> * "The Triumph of Autonomy in Bioethics and Commercialism in American Healthcare," Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2007, 16: 415-419 [2]<br /> * “Taking <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_36">Stem Cells</span> Seriously”, American Journal of Bioethics, 2006, 6(5), 6-7. [3]<br /> * “Congress’s Hybrid Problem,” <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_37">Hastings Center</span> Report, 2006: 12-13. [4]<br /> * “Guidelines for <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1299275250_38">Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research.” Nature Biotechnology</span>, 2005, 23: 793-4. [5]<br /><br /></div>