Worldwide Campaign to stop the Abuse and Torture of Mind Control/DEWs
i do believe this ties in directly with the comment i just made on the 'victory' blog about "intermittent chat access" - i joked to sue only last week (on a rare occasion we were able to connect) that these things are really a tribute
again, what you see is not what everyone gets there were ten or eleven members on at once earlier today
"Members Online evidences few members use chat. No more than six at any given time this month. Is third-party chat or Ning 2.0 tampered chat being retained to make peacepink inaccessible?"
(that quote is from the bottom of the link above)
I will correct the number to less than a dozen. A dozen is a tiny number.
i agree this explanation for why one member left the site may account for the suspiciously low attendance figures: http://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/franky-s-the-disinformatio...
it is quite difficult to access through search - i'm the only one who ever cites it, and it is buried under a pile of all (mostly) my blogs where it has been quoted - and even then it is not the relevant (first) page which appears
1) I have a good idea for you. You can create your own forum and community.
Others have created a community. You have the intellect and knowledge of computer science.
Ning offers the possibility to create your own community.
A) Monika created his community with ning.
Title: Mind control Victims Friends Around the World
B) Cliff has created his forum.
Title: Gang stalking wiki boards
2) I have already asked for a Regulation. A regulation in English and then translated into several languages. If you will create a regulation in English, then I will translate in the version in Italian. The request has already been written.
3) I asked at Christmas 2014, with the option banning "report an issue".
(26 december 2014 my report an issue)
The same option of facebook because Labrat and David of Tomorrow often quarrel.
If there was the option of banning such as facebook, both become invisible.
David bans LabRat. LabRat bans David. For me it is a democratic solution. Banning simultaneously.
Both become invisible.
With the banning (blocking), it is impossible to argue.
This option is useful to avoid flame wars and not see someone who does not like.
I think you've got it, which is the option of "banning" (block). The same option of facebook, to block a user.
cliff announced that he has taken down his forum when he discovered that he had lost control of his moderator functions (unless there has been an update in the situation) - peacepink is a rare site where 'both sides' are regularly heard from despite various different forms of repression, mechanical or otherwise as i mentioned on your other discussion only yesterday, the fact that it does not run smoothly (is under attack) means that there is something worthwhile going on here
B) Cliff has created his forum.
Title: Gang stalking wiki boards
It is horrendous when a moderator is hacked. Cliff acted ethically by losing his forum.
AtlantiTeo, your recommendation that I start a new forum implies that Peacepink does not have problems. I gave details of the problems and how to fix them. why is there no interest in trouble shooting?
I have no need to start a forum. Stopeg's forum, FFCHS Lefora forum, reddit.com/r/gangstalking and reddit.com/r/targetedindividual have none of the problems Peacepink has. Why? They neither have chat, blog nor latest activity. Stopeg forum and FFCHS forum follow the format that all forums follow except for peacepink. FFCHS uses Lefora. Lefora is free. Stopeg forum uses BB. BB is a free open source software.
Not to imply the problems lie with Ning. As I previously quoted Dustin, Ning's administrator, Ning 3.0 neither has chat nor pop ups. Ask Dustin for help. Upgrade to Ning 3.0. Follow my other solutions. Haven't others complained and offered solutions?
Regarding banning users, first there needs to be written rules. Offenders need to be warned once. second offense results in being banned.
LaBrat, I disagree that a hacked website implies something worthline is going on in the website. In the case of peacepink, there is very little worth while information and it is deeply buried due to the problems I described in part 2. Very little on shielding of which some is disinformation. hardly anything on meter measurements and how to safely elude and relocate. Lives are at risk. Hacking of this website is more of an indication of the website's lost potential to be of value. Meaning hacking discourages new members from posting information.
when I clicked on the add reply icon, browser froze. My last 3 paragraphs were omitted.
Hacking discourages new members from reading, referring the website and donating.
I had offered to donate to FFCHS if they referred the downloads of their recordings and text chat of podcasts and newsletter archive on their website and newsletter. They refused. FFCHS severely restrict their information to a live audience.
I considered donating to peacepink but peacepink is too resistant to trouble shoot. I will donate to stopeg.
My sentence about Cliff acting ethically had a typo. Word should have been 'closing.'
Banning needs to be site wide. Atlanteo, arguing is not the problem. It is threadjacking and bullying.
Peacepink has at least two Jesus freaks that write long threadjacking comments in numerous threads. They do not argue. They threadjack. AtlantiTeo, by identifying two members, you implied that they are the only members who threadjack. I recommend members and moderators to check out the other forums and reddit and then make peacepink functional. I have not joined the 3 yahoo groups listed in my FFCHS post. Years ago, I had joined 2 yahoo groups. No problems. It is surprising to me that members and moderators do not recognize that Peacepink is extremely deviant from all other forums and reddit.
by this logic (since, as i say, teo was also hacked, and soleilmavis blocked), we should also lose our forum:
Reply by energyweaponsatme
"It is horrendous when a moderator is hacked. Cliff acted ethically by losing his forum."
i disagree with that, and also with the conclusion that a mod getting hacked here is not necessarily significant - do you recall my telling you that he happened to lose a bunch of video testimonies from members to be presented to the council of europe?
Am I hearing y'all correctly, the owner of this site was banned?