Peacepink

Worldwide Campaign to stop the Abuse and Torture of Mind Control/DEWs

Who could find the laws of Michigan, Massachusetts and Maine on electromagnetic weapons?

Hello,

There is the NATO summit in Warsaw on the 8th and 9th which means talking weapons and we wish to make a point on electromagnetic weapons. It happens that there is an excellent judiciary text of comparative law of electromagnetic harassment including scientific background. It happens to be in French but we could translate it and also enrich it. A petition has been linked to it. It is here (French). (credit Davili16, Hassancmv).

First important thing: Who could find information about the laws on electromagnetic weapons in the States of Michigan, Massachusetts and Maine? E.g. media reports etc.

Would it be possible to have a look on the text below as a guide although it is in French? (It is possible to find it using the above petition link and use Google Chrome right-click for translate.

(I have covered the Federal Law part i.e. H.R. 2977 (2001) Space Preservation Act of 2001)

Thank you

Views: 709

Comment by information-book com on July 5, 2016 at 9:57pm

Here is the text by Louis Freyheit from this link:

1.2 Lois

11. – Interdiction des armes électromagnétiques au Michigan. Cet Etat a passé deux lois pénales en 2003 [[16] =House Bill 4513 et 4514 Public Act N°256 of 2003 (effective 1st january of 2004)] sur les armes. L’utilisation d’appareils électroniques ou électromagnétiques aux fins de nuire est explicitement prévue par la loi.

Cette loi définit ce qu’est un appareil électronique ou électromagnétique nuisible ou nocif :

“The People of the State of Michigan enact: Sec. 200h. As used in this chapter:

8 (k) "Harmful electronic or electromagnetic device" means a device designed to emit or radiate or that, as a result of its design, emits or radiates an electronic or electromagnetic pulse, current, beam, signal, or microwave that is intended to cause harm to others or cause damage to, destroy, or disrupt any electronic or telecommunications system or device, including, but not limited to, a computer, computer network, or computer system.” L’appareil visé irradie ou émet une pulsation, un courant, un rayon, un signal électronique ou électromagnétique ou des micro-ondes. Ce sont à la fois l’appareil, et son émission qui sont expressément qualifiés d’électromagnétiques, et non de simplement électriques. Les micro-ondes sont également expressément prévues. Ce type de précision, consacrée législativement, s’explique par des plaintes consécutives à des utilisations malignes d’appareils électromagnétiques. La finalité de l’utilisation est d’ailleurs prévue, elle est ici de causer un préjudice, au moyen d’un appareil nocif.

Sont interdits la fabrication, la fourniture, la possession, le transport, la proposition, l’usage ou la distribution de tels appareils. La sanction encourue la plus élevée est la perpétuité. Elle est applicable en cas de dommages corporels importants (« serious impairment of a body function ») ou en cas de décès de la victime (Section 200i).  

Des dérogations sont prévues pour les forces militaires, la police, en cas d’ordre légitime ou de défense légitime.

Les Etats du Massachusetts et du Maine ont passé des lois concernant les armes électroniques, émettant des courants électriques. Ceci les rend ambiguës. Le terme électronique qualifiant les armes peut inclure l’électromagnétisme, ce qui est moins certain concernant les émissions, par le choix fait du qualificatif « électrique».

12. – Interdiction des armes électroniques dans le Massachusetts. Cet Etat réprime par l’Acts of 2004, Chapter 170, la possession d’armes électroniques : toutes les armes émettant un courant, impulsion, rayon, onde électrique pour handicaper, blesser ou tuer.

La loi pose une interdiction de principe à la section 131J. No person shall possess a portable device or weapon from which an electrical current, impulse, wave or beam may be directed, which current, impulse, wave or beam is designed to incapacitate temporarily, injure or kill. L’amende encourue s’élève de 500 à 1000 dollars et l’emprisonnement de 6 mois à deux ans et demi, suivant les cas.

Des dérogations sont prévues pour les forces de l’ordre, notamment.

13. - Interdiction des armes électroniques dans le Maine. Cet Etat a passé la loi HP 868 – LD 1271 sur l’utilisation criminelle d’armes électroniques.

Sec. 1. 17-A MRSA §1004 is enacted to read: §1004. Criminal use of electronic weapon

1. Except as provided in subsection 4, a person is guilty of criminal use of an electronic weapon if the person intentionally, knowingly or recklessly uses an electronic weapon upon any other person.

2. As used in this section, "electronic weapon" means a portable device or weapon from which an electrical current, impulse, wave or beam may be directed, which current, impulse, wave or beam is designed to have a disabling effect upon human beings.

3. Criminal use of an electronic weapon is a Class D crime.

4. This section does not apply to the use of an electronic weapon by: A. A law enforcement officer, corrections officer or corrections supervisor engaged in the performance of the law enforcement officer's, corrections officer's or corrections supervisor's public duty if the officer's or corrections supervisor's appointing authority has authorized such use of an electronic weapon; or B. A person using deadly force when that use is for the purpose of: (1) Defending that person or a 3rd person as authorized under section 108, subsection 2; or (2) Defending that person's dwelling place as authorized under section 104, subsections 3 and 4.

 

Comment by Sandy Lomax on July 6, 2016 at 6:07pm

Hello information-book

Did you see the European Parliament`s Resolution on this tech, proposed by UK Green Party, and passed in January 1999? It remained a resolution and did not become a law, resolution A4-0005/99.

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&refer...

See in particular paragraph 30 under Legal Aspects of Military Activity: "...a global ban on...development of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings...."

The Green Party are sympathetic to the issue. But as the UK have just voted to leave the EU, Green Members of the EU Parliament can no longer help us! Maybe the Green Party in France could help - you could get advice from them. 

Comment by Sue on July 6, 2016 at 7:07pm

Info-book not sure if the following is what youre after or if you have covered it. Couldnt find any media articles at all.

MICHIGAN

Analysis available @ http://www.michiganlegislature.org Page 1 of 2 Pages

House Bill 4513 and 4514 (5-19-03)

PROHIBIT HARMFUL ELECTRONIC

OR ELECTROMAGNETIC DEVICES

House Bill 4513

Sponsor: Rep. Mike Nofs

House Bill 4514

Sponsor: Rep. William Van Regenmorter

Committee: Criminal Justice

Complete to 5-19-03

A SUMMARY OF HOUSE BILLS 4513 AND 4514 AS INTRODUCED 4-2-03

 The bills would amend provisions contained in Chapter 33 of the Michigan Penal Code

entitled “Explosives and Bombs, and Harmful Devices” to define the term “harmful electronic or

electromagnetic device” and to prohibit the manufacture or use of such a device. The bills are

tie-barred to each other. Specifically, the bills would do the following:

 House Bill 4513 would amend the penal code (MCL 750.200h) to define “harmful

electronic or electromagnetic device” as a device designed to emit or radiate an electronic or

electromagnetic pulse or signal or microwave intended to cause harm to others or cause damage

to, destroy, or disrupt any electronic or telecommunications system or device including a

computer or computer network. The bill would also include a harmful electronic or

electromagnetic device in the definition of “imitation harmful substance or device.” Further,

Section 200h currently defines “serious impairment of a body function” as meaning that term as

defined by Section 58c of the Michigan Vehicle Code. This definition would be deleted and

replaced by the full definition as contained in the vehicle code.

 House Bill 4514 would amend the penal code (MCL 750.200i et al.) to make it a crime to

manufacture, deliver, possess, transport, place, use, or release a harmful electronic or

electromagnetic device for an unlawful purpose. This would be in addition to the current

prohibitions for harmful biological substances or devices, harmful chemical substances or

devices, and harmful radioactive materials or devices. The penalty would be the same as

currently allowed (penalties range from imprisonment for not more than 15 years and a fine of

not more than $10,000, or both to life without parole and a fine up to $40,000). In addition, the

bill would specify that the penalties would apply whether the violation resulted directly or

indirectly in property damage or in personal injury, serious impairment, or death to another

person.

 Similarly, it would also be prohibited to cause an individual to falsely believe that he or she

had been exposed to a harmful electronic or electromagnetic device just as it is currently

prohibited to do so regarding a harmful biological substance or device, harmful chemical

substance or device, or harmful radioactive material or device. The penalty for this crime would

remain the same as for the others at imprisonment for not more than five years, a fine of not

more than $10,000, or both.

http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(rlg1ljskedddfzzuoywoxghy))/mileg.aspx?page=getObject&objectName=mcl-750-200i

http://garydchance.tripod.com/surveillance/id32.html

MASSACHUSSETS 

https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Chapter265...

https://malegislature.gov/laws/generallaws/partiv/titlei/chapter269...

https://www.muckrock.com/foi/massachusetts-1/inventory-of-all-non-l...

MAINE  

http://whosarat.websitetoolbox.com/post/state-of-maine-laws-electro...

http://www.gangstalkingwiki.com/ElectronicHarassmentLaws.htm

 http://www.inandoutofthebox.net/blog/?p=12159

Comment by information-book com on July 6, 2016 at 7:24pm

Sue, thank you very much for your search effort! I will read this material.

Comment by information-book com on July 6, 2016 at 7:25pm

Sandy, thank you for the information! I am so glad for this emerging team effort.

Comment by information-book com on July 6, 2016 at 9:05pm

@STOPZET facebook published the protest video (from Polish media) with English subtitles here and as I went to their site and saw the pinned announcement of the protest somebody had posted under comments this link to a Federal Law

https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/1073

(Sec. 2) Amends the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to define "EMP" to mean: (1) an electromagnetic pulse caused by intentional means, including acts of terrorism; and (2) a geomagnetic disturbance caused by solar storms or other naturally occurring phenomena.

Comment:

Extremely interesting: Electromagnetic harassment has the same mechanism as geomagnetic disturbances

Link to HAARP, the atmospheric heater which excites the ionosphere and changes the physical properties in the area.

Comment by Sue on July 6, 2016 at 9:15pm
Comment by information-book com on July 6, 2016 at 10:55pm

Thank you, Sue, I understand much better now.

Here are some excerpts (slight modification in first one):

Article by Maine State Reprentative Andrea Boland (D-ME), who introduced legislation  to protect the electric grid from geomagnetic disturbances (GMD) and electromagnetic pulse (EMP) (weapons or terrorist devices); it was passed into law by almost the majorities of both houses

“my bill, LD 131, An Act to Secure the Safety of Electrical Transmission Lines. It required grid protections against extreme solar storms and electromagnetic pulse weapons of hostile nations or terrorist devices.”

“The utilities do not want serious reliability standards for GMD and EMP, argue they are not needed, and work to block attempts to regulate them.”

“Ultimately, the Committee unanimously passed “emergency legislation” in the form of a resolve: Resolve, Directing the Public Utilities Commission to Examine Measures to Mitigate the Effects of Geomagnetic Disturbances on Maine’s Transmission System. It passed the full legislature as emergency legislation, unanimously in the House and 32-3 in the Senate, and became law on June 11, 2013. It was considered an enormous victory for grid protection, the first such legislation in the U.S, and provided authority to the EUT Committee to report out permanent legislation, based on its findings, in early 2014.”

Comment by Sandy Lomax on July 7, 2016 at 5:12am

information-book, I think if you are going to make a point to the  NATO summit on this technology, it would be essential to include the issue of the human rights of the victims/TIs. What is being perpetrated is a serious violation of human rights, which needs to be addressed. You could refer to the European Convention on Human Rights. For example, article 2 the right to life, article 3 prohibits torture including inhuman or degrading treatment, article 5 the right to liberty, article 8 the right to privacy, personal and family life and correspondence, article 9 freedom of thought, article 13 right to effective remedy for violation of rights, etc. All these rights have been violated. See wikipedia article:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Convention_on_Human_Rights

Comment by information-book com on July 7, 2016 at 8:30pm

Covert Harrassment of Electromagnetic Harassment is a violation of Human Rights and should always be mentioned as such at all fora. We must raise awareness on electromagnetic weapons so that we attract the attention of all related organisations, meetings and fora such as the NATO summit, the Timbie forum and the UN convention of Bioweapons and persuade them to address the matter as it falls into their jurisdiction.

Comment

You need to be a member of Peacepink to add comments!

Join Peacepink

Latest Activity

NFL2019 is now a member of Peacepink
4 hours ago
jane left a comment for Mathew
"Hello Mathew, I’m in the Uk too, been through the lot, how are you? best wishes jane"
11 hours ago
Irina liked Soleilmavis's profile
yesterday
Irina liked Soleilmavis's blog post Write to FBI and CIA and urge them to investigate mind control abuses
yesterday
Linda Bressendorff is now friends with Frank Luetkebohmert, silvia miras sanchez, Juan G. Rodriguez and Brian Marks more
yesterday
davidfulton3 posted videos
yesterday
Snoop Fourtruth replied to JasonMxxxx's discussion NASA FUTURE OF WARFARE - StopTheCrime.net
yesterday
Mathiew Burkett liked Soleilmavis's blog post THE GLOBAL NEUROETHICS CONFERENCE IN VANCOUVER, BC, CANADA!
yesterday

Badge

Loading…

© 2019   Created by Soleilmavis.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service