Peacepink

Worldwide Campaign to stop the Abuse and Torture of Mind Control/DEWs

hi!  my name is mike laberge (with a capital 'b')   i chose 'LaBrat' because of the stealth brain surgery i discovered when my hair fell out - the 'operation' occurred in the ewan cameron time frame and vicinity   i learned sometime after registering that a martyr and pioneer of our plight used to be known as 'labrat'   no capital, to be sure, but still...had i known this i would have chosen differently out of respect for the deceased    my mother was unusually unwell and tried to perform post-natal abortion on me a number of times   (i will only report incidents which can be verified by credible witnesses)   my dad was a scrupulous and reputable journalist (back before the 'strange-embedded-fellows' school of laying copy) - for example he stopped receiving national news-magazine editor awards the year he declined an invitation for cdn press to the lyndon johnson oval office   once he told me that while i was a baby, he had come home one night and found a bullet stuck in the door right in front of my crib    mummy dearest told him she thought she'd heard an "intruder" down the hall   i had no doubts about this outrageous tale, and not only because of the unique bonding experience i'd shared with one sister:  she still remembers (i was 5, she then 3) being threatened with death for asking "but why, mummy?" when i was told that i would, barring quite specific concessions, be shot on the spot   my super mom then began loading the modified f.n. desert action 'semi-automatic' (flash-muzzle, recoil pad, and a trick clip function converting it to fully-automatic as required - normally for seasonal game, although one gendarme sorta got in her way once, for an awkward moment or two...)   listen to me:  these are people who can do no wrong, no matter who gets hurt   did anybody call children's aid about my scars?   my dad joked, not seeing the full humour of it, that as a child i was a "regular" at the emergency ward  (well, i was always adventurous - she told me my first word was "NO!")   apparently i was a "solemn" kid   or did anyone express concern or even curiousity at my brother the serial underage runaway ('calgary or bust') getting carted of to a mental institution (4 yrs of drugs, shock 'therapy', sexual molestation...) for threatening to go ballistic if the police didn't come and stop her?   when i was still an infant i was more than once strangled to sleep so the neighbours wouldn't hear me cry and think she was a bad mother  - and my younger sister became good at repairing drywall to hide bullet marks so no one else would get involved and/or hurt   there is a scar on my elbow - "baby's first skin graft!"   ok, so it doesn't hurt anymore now...but the point is that it was never even an issue   and the injury that sent me to the ottawa riverside hospital, which did not accept emergency cases btw, for the illegal and unnecessary lobotomy (for a "broken cheekbone"?!), was no accident, i discovered later (at her funeral, by 'coincidence')   some very serious people who in my view seem to know what they're talking about have confirmed that i am one of those lucky ones inescapably destined for live incineration through ritual sacrifice (hence the title above) - that would certainly, if true, hide any evidence inside MY skull and bones   (for what it's worth, my dad was over-ruled by one sibling, and "brow-beaten on his death-bed" in front of and according to another, regarding his well-known desire to be cremated)   i do not believe that this long streak of fortune (i'm now 60) is accidental and have noticed some striking features in my personal biography indicating an occluded connection with the satanic occultists hoagland and bara cite describe as running this ugly show   let's look at the freemasons, for eg:  their symbol has an 'a' (the pyramid or 'pointers') and a 'g' (the apron)   the (capital) 'a' can be inverted ('v'), doubled ('m'), or both ('w') for a total of 5 secret coded letters   look at george washington, abe lincoln etc for an inkling - or winston churchill, adolf hitler, mussolini, de gaulle, etc - there does seem to be an historically significant trend (alexander the great, ghengis, attilla, augustus all the way forward to g bush, a merkle, v putin...)   and let's take a quick glance at 'communism' - here we see a chairman mao, karl marx, vladimir lenin - hmm...precursor beatles reunion: lenin and (joe) macarthy!   one fine day i chanced to notice that my life-long leftie dad had a 'canadian amalgamation of aeronautic and mechanical engineers' badge tucked away with his journalism awards   (it's pretty cool, actually - the words form a skull and bones even when you turn it upside down)   imagine my surprise to learn that he was nasa's 'shop steward'!    with an iq of 182 it's quite possible he may have been deployed (used) in ways he would not even be aware of   during the war they had him on amphetamines for 3 months straight   he never had any more luck than i had with finding medical records - there are zero records associated with my surgical scars (see 'photo's)   i later realized that every single one of the ladies i'd been associated with for any length of time (as in, for a number of years) bore one of those initials (except for the one outright named after one of these shadowy groups) - and i have travelled the world   my 4 siblings all have them too   the odds of this occurring by chance are about as astronomical as carl sagan's insanely ridiculous response to the arecibo message reply   these odds (and their implications) made me a little nervous, actually, even though regular scary things like bears, ufo's (i have photo's) and stalkers do not    so, i promptly, and maybe a little defensively, hid behind the exception to the rule: the 'mainstay', one miss 'x.y.z.'   but then my dad himself pointed out that her first name was actually a short form (a 'nick'name) for 1 of the 5   the astute reader will have discerned that my unwitting involvement with such covert groups extends even further than i seem to be willing to elaborate - this is only for fear of imperilling (possibly innocent) others   it's not like it could get much worse for me of course - i'm fair-skinned, and quite prone to sunburn!   'peace!'

Views: 39

Comment by Sue on August 5, 2014 at 3:42pm

Geez Labrat, sorry to hear about your mum and various associations. If it makes you feel any better lve been targeted since birth by relatives and associations, dont know if there any occult ties but quite possible. I believe your mum could have been a victim of mind control. Whatever the case its the strong who survive these circumstances so you must be a tough nut. Thanks for sharing.

Comment by LaBrat on August 5, 2014 at 5:06pm

hmm:  you may be right about the m-c   at the wedding (their one family 'chat') her family told my dad that she'd held the world record for longest-surviving incubator bay, (detroit 1933) - delivered after two months but kept in the box for almost two years   i've since been 'corrected' by busy-bodies that this would factually anachronistic - but perhaps she was 'treated' at the same kind of facility that did my stealth lobotomy   or 'fixed' my brother   my sister has a book describing this start to life as notoriously poor preparation for parenthood - no one to hold her and sing when she cried, for eg. which would explain a lot of my treatment   since her irish-catholic immigrant dad became editor of the cdn. parliamentary minutes (hansard), i'd have to say now that it does all begin to look a bit unusual...supposedly we're distant cousins of mulroney (neither side is boasting about it) so maybe it's a reptilian blood-line thing lol   hey do you know how 'mulroney' is pronounced in his home-town of baie-comeaux?  "mal runee" - that means badly run!   hey cuz - can you free trade our economy back, please?

Comment by LaBrat on August 6, 2014 at 2:22pm

i alluded to old-style integrity in journalism above, and mentioned the president johnson example   but here is a much better one, and not very far away from the theme of the old Hollywood classic 'roman holiday' that my dad loved so much   the night before the government of canada was about to release to budget, conservative prime minister john diefenbaker's closest friend passed away   my dad was a wise reporter who, breaking with tradition, conducted most of his interviews by phone, saving hours of travel   in dief's distress he accidentally let slip the vast import of 'tomorrow's headlines' regarding the economy   now my dad actually ran for the (socialist) ndp in 1963, and well knew that we only enjoyed benefits such as mother's allowance and old age pensions because tommy douglas formed a coalition with the minority gov't based on very human concessions   but he was what we used to call a 'professional' back in the days when you could say the word with pride   he didn't make a million dollars that night through 'insider trading'   he didn't bring the government down either, which the reporting of such a crucial slip might well have done   he completed the interview, thanked the prime minister offering condolences for his loss - and that was that   never had much trouble getting interviews after that, of course...

Comment by David ofTomorrow just now
Delete Comment

Hey Sue! Did you remember this post??? Reread it, then the comments. You'll notice that twice Brat says he had a lobotomy.in the following posts he then denies it, but only after i loibted out what the side effects were. It seems tgst hecwanted to be asscociated with the lobotomy but not the side effects so he dropped them both.
I know you dont want to be involved but, he is a compuldive liar. I am uncovering many simikar things,. His motive fir bashing Deca and i are not.based on trolling or perphood. Thosecare lies. Please becaware tgst anything you hear from this member is likely untrue. 
https://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/spiritual-or-technology?com...
"for example your 'no-exit ad-hominem' diagnosis where, either i am disabled for having a lobotomy, or for believing i have one (my delgado surgery achieved neither)" 
Here is another quote from tbat page where he does admit to brain damage, but denies the lobotomy that he twice on this fireside post said hd had.
" Reply by LaBrat on September 19, 2014 at 4:38pm
where does it say brain damage inflicted by a lobotomy? misrepresenting is still lying - you've been told that often enough it can't be another 'mistake': can you make one true statement, just to show you're not a defective lie-bot?

David ofTomorrow said:
LaBrat said:
well i DID post a photo of a brain surgery for which there are no medical records and I DID send you a message asking for directions with this evidence and it's NOT like i've been glossing over the technical difficulties of forwarding material myself due to the brain-damage and surgery-induced 20 percentile in mechanical aptitude i scored after the injury no response so far consider the request recinded btw in other news, i don't follow the "you what?" thing i do believe i successfully conveyed the gist of big 'l's clearly worded thoughts which you seemed to be having difficulty addressing directly it appears that i then offered suggestions so that your actions would not be misrepresented in a bad light by doubters if i take any of that back, how will you then be able to thank me? speaking of which, evidently you have not been paying attention to the several excellent references cited by the big lebowski pity, since some of them were intended for your personal and professional edification on your own blogs"

Comment by David ofTomorrow just now
Delete Comment

If hes willing to lie about something as fundamentally important as a lobotomy to you Sue, who he calls a friend, what else does he tell you that is bullSh*t??
He calls me a perp troll and you know Thats a lie. 
Please be careful in dealing with him

Views: 344

Replies to This Discussion

Comment by David ofTomorrow 1 second ago
Delete Comment

Just keeping the conversation current Brat! I am going to copy padte this one too, just so it doesn't disappear.  You have said several times that you did not have a lobotomy in this post alone. And your psychological projecting is text book. Quite a study in compulsive lying.

Comment by David ofTomorrow 4 hours ago
Delete Comment

This is interesting. Remember how you were right about me having OCD? Well I looked it up:

"Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) is an anxiety disordercharacterized by intrusive thoughts that produce uneasiness, apprehension, fear or worry (obsessions), repetitive behaviors aimed at reducing the associated anxiety (compulsions), or a combination of such obsessions and compulsions. Symptoms of the disorder include excessive washing or cleaning, repeated checking, extremehoarding, preoccupation with sexual, violent or religious thoughts,relationship-related obsessions, aversion to particular numbers and nervous rituals such as opening and closing a door a certain number of times before entering or leaving a room. These symptoms are time-consuming, might result in loss of relationships with others, and often cause severe emotional and financial distress. The acts of those who have OCD may appear paranoid and potentially psychotic. However, people with OCD generally recognize their obsessions and compulsions as irrational and may become further distressed by this realization. Despite the irrational behaviour, OCD is sometimes associated with above-average intelligence.[1][2] Its sufferers commonly share personality traits such as high attention to detail, avoidance of risk, careful planning, exaggerated sense of responsibility and a tendency to take time in making decisions"

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obsessive–compulsive_disorder

Notice tge part where it says OCD is sometimes associated with above-average intelligence. Otger articles state most OCD sufferers are above average. 

So, with my obsession on being right, I most often am right. Otherwise I dont spend tge time to argue.  

You , on the other hand, are a compulsive liar. You will argue for attention, and lie to continue the argument,  in order to receive attention. You, in the end, have no concern if you are right or not. There are things other than truth that motivate tge tongue of the compulsive liar.

Comment by David ofTomorrow 4 hours ago
Delete Comment
  • Or ratger in comarrison to tbe Stanford-Binet scale, as it only measures mensa levles and starts at 132.
Comment by David ofTomorrow 4 hours ago
Delete Comment

By the way, my 127 score was on the Stanford-Binet scale.

Comment by David ofTomorrow 4 hours ago
Delete Comment

In case you're wondering,  I did take a mensa self iq test in 06. I took it honestly.  I scored 127. I did horrible on math. Which is ironic because my parents were told that I was doing college math at 11, and I do very well with math as a machinist, using trig, geometry,  calculus, decimal fraction conversions. I scored extremely high on the intuition test.  If I had not screwed my math score, I might have scored 130 or higher on The IQ test.

Comment by David ofTomorrow 4 hours ago
Delete Comment

Check this out,

"furthermore, the incomplete sentence as stands does not actually make a point   with my 'brain damage' i scored a 99 percentile in verbal reasoning aptitude (they don't award 100) and am in the upper percentages of mensa"

http://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=2351430%3ABlogPost%...

Then check this out;

Membership requirementEdit

Mensa's requirement for membership is a score at or above the 98th percentile on certain standardised IQ or other approved intelligence tests, such as the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales. The minimum accepted score on the Stanford-Binet is 132, while for the Cattell it is 148.[11] Most IQ tests are designed to yield a mean score of 100 with a standard deviation of 15; the 98th-percentile score under these conditions is 131"

So. You are saying that your IQ is higher than 148, or 132 depending on what standard you use. And, since you say upper percentage, and we coukd use Einstein's 240 as top, then you are saying you have an IQ above 190.

Yet you dont understand what language mechanics are or how to use them. You score 20% and mechanical aptitude overall. 

It is apparent that you are a compulsive liar.  

Comment by David ofTomorrow 4 hours ago
Delete Comment

This is the copy paste of tge incident that you accuse me of threatening to feed a Karens kids to dogs. Lets read the stuff and see if we can see any threats...

"Karen, or anyone else that has to worry about something a little more distressing than how many people are in her aisle at the supermarket, like if her children are being fed to dogs while she is being kept in a cell....or if her parents are being murdered while trying to save you. Or if you are going to be raped from behind while your guts are being cut out to hang down in front of you then peciks are poked into your body until you die. 
Being made to do various types of tricks for days on end with the promise of release, but never any relief.
I have been raped sexually by groups of men with this machine. I have had years of chronic pain to my testicles caused to make them feel powerful. 
When it comes to things like how many people are in your aisle at the store, or whose peeking around a pole, it might simply be easier to deal with than worrying about your kid being eaten by dogs. "

http://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=2351430%3ABlogPost%...

If you will notice,  I start by referring not just to Karen but to all. So it certainly wasnt something specific to Karen as you stated. Then, as I go on, I use the word You. This was again, for all in the indefinite sense. The repeated word if, and the use of worry, showed the hypothetical nature of the statement.  I finish by clearly stateing thst these references were my experiences,  and Why it was that i made the comparison.  There was no way to misinterpret it into a threat!  None. To say I threatened Karen or her kids is a blatant lie!

You've been caught again mr. Upper percentage mensa.

Comment by David ofTomorrow 5 hours ago
Delete Comment

Heres another later on that same page,,,

",  but perhaps she was 'treated' at the same kind of facility that did my stealth lobotomy   or 'fixed' my brother"

Feeling ill yet Brat???

Comment by David ofTomorrow 5 hours ago
Delete Comment

Heres one Brat!!!!

"ok, so it doesn't hurt anymore now...but the point is that it was never even an issue   and the injury that sent me to the ottawa riverside hospital, which did not accept emergency cases btw, for the illegal and unnecessary lobotomy (for a "broken cheekbone"?!)"

Found here!!!

http://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/labrat-s-fireside-chat

Now,  when were you lying, when you said here tgat you hsd an illegal lobotomy at riverside hospital,  or when you said,'no no, it was just a lobotomy scar, no lobotomy. '

You are the lier, not me!

Ill find more statements about your lobotomy. 

Comment by David ofTomorrow 5 hours ago
Delete Comment

Oh, and although I failed to finish  the sentence properly, I did use a verb, in the indicitive pefect conjugatec sense. 

"I think the fact that you eithet have had, or you believe you have had,  two brain surgeries including a lobotomy."

You 'have had' , is the phrase. Do you want to explain what uppef percentage mensa means?

Also, you say tgat my sentence says tgat you Dont have a lobotomy,  as though this was wrong.  I dont see it tgat way, but regardless,  you dont deny tgat you claim to have had one.

Ill keep looking for where you said that you did have a lobotomy. 

Comment by David ofTomorrow 5 hours ago
Delete Comment

3) you claim that I dont really have a girlfriend, then you proceed to ask if I gave her a drug speach. First, why I. The world would you claim that I didnt have a girlfriend?  And if you believe that i didn't,  why then did you ask me if I gave her a drug speach?

4) you also claim.....That I Dont Have a Daughter!!!!!! WTF man! Ive had the same daughter for 19 years now!! 

Why in the world would you claim that its a lie??? I have mentioned my daughter throughout my time on peacepink. 

5) you invoke Deca as an authority, because he called me a shill,  so you say it Must be true. He has called you the very same thing! So, according to your upper percentage mensa reasoning, YOU Are aShill, TOO!!

This whole paragraph is a condensed version of your whoke. You do nothing but lie, blatantly and without foundation. Your motive is to put others down in order to build your self esteem.  You psychological project constantly. 

Ill find more....

Comment by LaBrat yesterday

do you again deny making the statement?   and, do you (again) then deny denying it?   has karen forbidden you to clear your name on this haunting issue?   you have yet to address the lies i copied, a couple from your comments even here    do you think changing the subject from your dog lies to this lobotomy lie will make any difference?    it was "lobotomy scar" from the first post   after too many explanatory references to the lobotomy SCAR, many subsequent references were to your 'lobotomy' abbreviation charge   there is no where that i allege having had a lobotomy and i explained at the time why the scar is through there   this is like a child who gets caught lying trying to drown it out in bigger lies   no i do not think members are stupid (lame attempt to divide, btw), and as i've said more than once in this same topic, i  don't think even you are quite THAT stupid ha ha!   you're just lying   i have already expressed my sentiments on how mensa membership may be a hindrance to understanding so i really can't see this as relevant in any way:  except, of course, as further filler to cover up the dog-gone lying!   i really don't care what you "swallow", dotty, because i don't make statements that can't be supported  speaking of which: do you deny making the remarks which might either disgrace the k9 squad, or at least call for the attention of the aspca? (and the food and drug association, of course...)  and do you deny denying it?   i'm afraid that if you are unable to summon the intellectual honesty and moral fortitude to at least address the lies so itemized, and publically uttered and denied i might add, then it's 'talk to the hand' again  now why don't you go fill up side-bar in a flurry of additional lying accusations   this is boring

Comment by David ofTomorrow yesterday
Delete Comment

Can I ask you LaBrat,  do you have brain damage?

Comment by David ofTomorrow yesterday
Delete Comment

You always tell the truth????? You apearantly dont remember how many members that you told bout having yes having a lobotomy. Then when I brought up the mental effects of a lobotomy,  it became just a scar. Like a woman would call a apendix removal scar a c section scar....get real. Were not stupid. You said clearly that you had a lobotomy.  Then just a lobotomy scar. Now its just brain damage.

Or, when you realize what it means that you suffer from brain damage, yet are upper level mensa, all while being onky 20% mechanical aptitude. ....how many things do you expect us to swallow on your trip to higher self esteem?

Sue has askec you to stop, full name has asked you to stop, Karen has asked you to stop, Deca has asked you to stop, I have askec you to stop,  Scott has asked you to stop, Tracy has asked you to stop. How long do you think tgat Christine d will allow you to use her to bash others? 

And just out of curiosity,  Mr, Perp finder, what do you think real perps are doing while you distract everyone with your constant Drama Factory? Or is it that I am the onky perp you see out of 3400 members?? Does your CIA argument hokd water? Where afe all the CIA then??? 

Comment by David ofTomorrow yesterday
Delete Comment

You dont seem to get it. Karen doesnt want you using her or my refefence to my experience and how it related to her for your subversive purposes.  It does not matter how you view things or how you go about explaining things. So stop doing it.

Comment by LaBrat yesterday

you lied, david   i copied it, remember?   if i call you a liar, it is because it is true (ie. not a lie)  it is not that hard to distinguish   it just requires a little moral courage - and a more humane work situation  typically, you lie here   there is no reference to anyone's dog until towards the very end of what you claim you skipped through AFTER reading (and after "realizing i was just name-calling")   and the only reason i even mention the disgraceful dog imagery is because you immediately lied about that as well ("I NEVER SAID anything about...") on the 'spiritual or technology' blog   "dog" is just a diversion from "lie"

this nastiness first popped up on christine d's blog (remember *cries*?!), not in private chat as you later (publically) alleged,   furthermore, it was perhaps a not well thought out maneuver to falsely accuse me of slander from the daily journal blog you blocked me from (how ironic - since that is what you have, publically, and actionably too i'll remind you, done to me: slander)   nothing i have said is untrue and it can all be documented   that is a real advantage, and it follows automatically just from speaking the truth 

and the 'anti-american' sentiments you are attempting to return are mis-placed   my issues are with the secret government (your boss, troll - real targets are honest, remember?) and those who support it   as i say, there is some measure of good and bad in everyone   i've lived in n.o., san fran, and kuawi - and i've also lived in trinidad, cambodia, indonesia etc   there is good and bad every place, too   all my 'quips' directed south of the border (aimed mostly there - we're not much different here anymore, sad to say - barely holding onto our enviable health system thanks to 'your' lobbyists dictating our policies from their laptops in 'our' parliamentary 'gallery') are very clearly targeted somewhat lower than at the people themselves (trolls excepted, of course!)   care for a demonstration?

eg "the company loves misery" (i'm kinda proud of that one, i will admit)   VERY specifically 'addressed', i dare say!   i am from the hippy era   we travelled   we 'rapped' with people   all people   and people around the world always say "most americans are the most open-minded people you'll ever meet"   but they shouldn't have to be saying that   the image portrayed by our media (also by your indiscriminate terrorist allegations, troll) don't seem as though they are making us friends around the world   mostly:  they LIE

Comment by David ofTomorrow yesterday
Delete Comment

In cade you cant see the subsequent posts because you were banned, there are several made after I removed you fir name calling. Including Karen telling you directly tgat she didnt want you using her or the situation you keep referring to as Dog eating kids....She said thatvwe talked, in private, and she fully understands what my intent was.  She said before everyone that she doesn't want to be any part of your troll bashing. 

If you dont believe me, ask someone who is a friend of mine,  who can read the rest of the posts, and tell you.

As for the rext of ypur post....I skipped it when I realized that you were again calling names. Is it a Canadian thing to act like a child when you are s old as you are? 

Comment by LaBrat yesterday

my mistake:  you closed it to friends only - is THAT is why no one has made any comments?   i am quite pleased with my final remark and will be content to let the record speak for itself on that score   i don't even know how to block messages or approve them so as usual have no idea what you're on about (not that that matters - you don't make much sense at the best of times: do you remember your "scientific theory?"  two contradictory premises cannot both be valid, you imbecile!  leave logic to those who understand it, 'dotty' - LOL! "member of several scientific blogs and you don't even understand how to make a syllogism?!)   why would i get banned from a c.i.a. site i never joined?  i haven't been banned form anywhere because i don't make cowardly threats ("sending" someone else, same as you did to lebowski cited last night) and don't make anal-rape threats either   care to tell us why you got banned for three days just before you decided to 'go civil'?  do you have any actually intelligent questions instead of this sub-standard drivel, and if so, could you maybe address them to your hundreds of facebook friends (who might somehow CARE?)   i guess you STILL haven't read franky's 'the disinformation train'   or nick's latest caution either   it is a little self-serving for the clumsiest and therefore most widely known troll in the business to want to pretend this site is un -pa'trolled'   sheri's source citing this as a site that encourages and promotes (even "causes") mental illness seems to be referring specifically to your many gas-lighting attempts, to say nothing of your 'schizophrenia' blogs and (INSANE!) serial diagnoses of anyone who disagrees (although calling tracy schizophrenic for calling such remote, amateur diagnoses of convenience "horrendous" does take the proverbial cake)   anyway, you have lied about denying threatening carrin, lebowski, myself, and others, about your inane dog food debacle and in your sneaky, behind-my-back accusations which you had already been corrected (and conceded ON RECORD) that i had not even threatened to do, and carrin still calls you a bully who threatens women, and i, a man 20 years your senior, suggested you follow through on these serial threats yourself and guess what: no takers!   so i am pleased to announce that i have NO respect for you   just one typical example of your dishonest misrepresentation, to give the general readership some idea of what i am referring to:  "Why would you label them (ffchs) a perp group for me banning you from my blog?"   where did i say that?  i have said nothing remotely similar   my EVERY reference to that organization is the site lebowski ref'd, 'a dozen reasons why it is clear that ffchs is a disinfo front group organized by gang-stalking perps'   get over yourself, dotty: not one of those dozen REASONS has anything to do with your cowardly hit-and-run blocking, or sniping from closed discussions, or any of your transparent daily ploys   get help - for all our sakes!                                                                                                              

Comment by David ofTomorrow yesterday
Delete Comment

I closed it to friends only. If I had a way to ban you onky, I would have done so. Your input on any of my posts is acceptable,  IF you act civil.  No accusations, no name clling, etc....

I did notice that you recently posted a blog and blocked all messages that werent yet approved. So im not sure how this makes me a perp, and ffchs a perp organization.  I must ask, did you get banned from ffchs? Why would you label them a perp group for me banning you from my blog?

Why are you on peacepink?  You believe that this is a CJA front....what then is your purpose here? 

 Can you honestly think of a TI organization that actually meets YOUR standards?

Comment by David ofTomorrow 21 hours ago
Delete Comment

Its hard to understand how you could possibly be upper level mensa when you didnt knowcabout language mechanics. Heres another article, 

ules of Writing Mechanics and Written Language

As students learn to write, they must consolidate rules for punctuation, capitalization, spelling, and grammar, without forgetting the ideas they want to use. In addition, they need to have the mental "fuel" necessary to concentrate long enough on the task and not be distracted by the things going on around them. Some students may have an easy time remembering rules for practicing mechanics and grammar on a work sheet, but struggle to remember everything at once while writing a paragraph, story, or report. To spell words correctly, students need to have a good understanding about the sounds that make up words, and how these sounds can be put together to create letters and words on paper. Some students are very good at remembering what words look like, others may sound out the word as they are spelling it.

As students progress through school, it is very helpful if they can remember how to spell many words automatically. When students are able to spell a word without stopping to think about it, they can pay more attention to remembering and organizing the ideas they want to write. This chart describes some important skills related to the mechanics of written language.

Necessary SubSkills Common Obstacles Helpful Tips
Student uses correct capitalization and punctuation. Student has a hard time remembering and/or using the rules for capitalization and punctuation. view
Student correctly spells most words when writing. Student frequently misspells words while writing stories, essays, book reports, etc. view
Student uses grammar correctly when writing.

Student struggles to remember and/or apply grammar rules, such as noun-verb agreement

http://www.allkindsofminds.org/getting-thoughts-on-paper-rules-of-w...

Comment by David ofTomorrow 21 hours ago
Delete Comment

Heres a start mister upper level mensa.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Language_mechanics

Category:Language mechanics

Subcategories

This category has the following 3 subcategories, out of 3 total.

G

P

S

Comment by David ofTomorrow 21 hours ago
Delete Comment

You are again bringing this person and your misinterpretation of my statement.  I never said that I was hoing to feed anyobidy to dofs. I said, and I admit to jit thoroughly explaining myself, that when one, I specifically used You several times, meaninv an indefinite you, therefore speaking in general to any reader. It was not in any way meantvthat Karens chikdren were goingbto be fed to dogs. In thiscway it was certainly NOT a threat!!! Karen, who you afd claiming to speak up for, understood that it was what I went through (you insist that it was a horrifying thing, yet you give no thought that I had to live through it!) And not about her expect as a refetence for perspective. 

So, why are you going on about it all??? It ix obviously a misinterpretation by YOU!!! Noone hax said anything about it even though you have brought it up out of context like 20 times!!!

It is obvious that you really do have brain damage. It is obvious that your brain damage affects how you treat others.  It is obvious tgat you cannot decifer reality as it is.

Please address your brain damage for tge sake of the group. 

Comment by LaBrat 22 hours ago
it is not entirely flabbergasting to find you hiding behind someone's skirts again, but this person asked not to be involved in troll-bashing   the issue here is integrity   you did make the statement, and you did deny it, mostly in capitals and followed by a lot of exclamation points   but no debating points   since you say you never said it, is the thing you never said supposed to be in reference to this un-named party (and her unnamed offspring?)  because you contradict this (beyond the careless denial) by claiming that this is YOUR experience, in YOUR response to ME on CHRISTINE'S blog!   or is that not true?   since i am raising it because you slandered me (on record) with your false accusation then dared to lie that i slandered you (on icaact phase III) and since you threatened to involve the fbi - i seriously doubt she is telling you not to clear your name on the charge of lying - since you say it wasn't her kids anyway   i invite the members who believe you are not a troll to examine the scar in 'my photos' and tell me how a frying pan could possibly account for two straight lines forming a cross   also: language is mechanical?!   i answered your pathetic accusation by pointing out that i scored a 99 percentile in verbal reasoning and language acquisition (percentile, so out of a possible maximum of 99) after getting the brain surgery   you know this already so i guess this, the 'lobotomy disability lie you posted elsewhere, and the references to my mother and nation are supposed to be 'baiting'?  they are persistent and lame diversions from addressing the truth about your lying   you accuse me falsely, while your lying denials are all still there   my esteem is just fine, and i am not going to continue to address each lying distraction ('deliberately obtuse' is just another way to lie) you try to cover this basic cowardly avoidance of confronting and redressing what is sadly merely the latest round of your perennial dishonesty   if only you had shame!
Comment by David ofTomorrow 23 hours ago
Delete Comment

I think you made up upper level mensa to bolster your low self-esteem.  I cant see how someone with 20% mechanical aptitude could be more than mentally, not psychologically,  disabled.  Mechanics envelop many aspects of life, from physics tp language. This is likely why you don't understand how to use proper punctuation and capitolization,  or paragrah structure. Its all mechanics. 

You arent upper level mebsa, and you fidnt have a lobotomy,  or an implant surgery,  you got brain damage because your mom hit you in the head with a frying pan!

Everything you say is bullshit. Everyone is seeing this. You will continue to be compulsive about the matter...soon you will claim some otger reality concerning your brian implant. Even tough your hero who calls you a nutter, deep thought diesnt believe in implants,  but noninvasive tech,  you still want to be the special lobotomy boy. I have never in my life cone across either a personbwith a lobotomy.  Or just a lobotomy scar. Rgey simply didn't have a lobotomy,  or they called the scar by its actual name. So, its likely the same for others,  it sticks out when Brat says he had a lobotomy.  And....now it will stick out tgat yoy deny it! 

And...do you or donyou jot have brain damage???

Comment by David ofTomorrow 23 hours ago
Delete Comment

Now, how did you get disability?  And how many members remember you telling them that you had a lobotomy?  I remember at leat three openly for anyone to reaf. So, im not the onky one going'Why is he now denying it? And who in the world woukd call an implant scar a lobotomy scar?'

 And,  I want to get this clear,  you claim that you had a scar above your eye, a lobotomy scar. But you also have said tgat you had a seperate scar for the implant surgerh. You have clearly, specifically said tgst you dad two sugeries, one fkr a lobotomy,  and one for implants. Then you said recently that they removed the whole top of your head, but now, again...just the scar over uour eye.

I think its vkear tgat you do have brain damage...Therefore your judgement of things is not truth, but brain damaged dillusions. 

Can you tell us all...do you have brain damage?  Or was tgat a lie to fet attention? In fact.... just like a BRAT...you are serking attention?  Thus the Constant Drama Factory? 

Comment by David ofTomorrow yesterday
Delete Comment

Respdct Others wishes to leave them out of it. 

Comment by LaBrat yesterday

as you have failed (and very predictably) to rise to the repeated challenge and address the issue of your lying denial (recorded on 'spiritual or technology'), it's talk to the hand   everybody else, have a nice day!

dotty by moral fortitude i mean courage, if that's any encouragement   intellectual honesty and moral courage   it's not that painful   i will sign out now as your boring ploys drag on and recycle   when i return, if i see that you have been so brave and honest (honuorable, we've had this discussion too, remember? on english lessons', where you made your cowardly "send someone" shotgun lobotomy and anal rape threats), then you may receive a measure of the respect your seem to feel that cowardly pathologically liars deserve   but as you've answered every opportunity to come clean (or at least acknowledge the denial!) with nothing but evasions and, for the most part, more blatantly transparent lying, i'd be quite surprised

Comment by David ofTomorrow yesterday
Delete Comment

Leave Karen out of it. She made an open statement for all to read, including that YOU misinterpreted my statement about dogs and such. So please respect her wish.

Comment by David ofTomorrow yesterday
Delete Comment

Another question,  you say you got disability because a nurse was caught lying about your lobotomy scar tgat wasnt a lobotomy,  but rather a full cap off brain surgery to implant a little tiny chip. But, you said it was proven tgat she lied about the surgery,  saying it didnt happen, and that your disability was rewarded wheb it was proven tgat she lied.....meaning tgere must tgen be proof tgat there was a brain surgery.  Tgat is the only way she could have been proven to have lied. Yet yoy say tgere is absolutely no proof that you had a surgery.  Just some deep indents.  

I would lije to ofder this meager attempt at being a conspiracy theorist so please bear with,me. 

When you were a baby, you were collicy.  You were thus loud. Your mom got mad and pounded your head with a pan to shut you up. Thus the scar, the brain damage, and the story that no obe knew what happened.  Your parents felt bad, bur didnt fess up.

Thats just a theory. ...but if all you got us a scar and brain damage, then my theory is as plausable as yours. And since your 'they proved my doctor liex about my surgety, Witjour proof that I had the surgery' shit, almost proves that you actually do have brain damage. 

So, you are either a real bad story teller, or yoy are severely brain damaged. 

Either way, I think its ckear why NO ONE is supporting your troll bashing campaign

Comment by David ofTomorrow 20 hours ago
Delete Comment

Well if The statement about dogs eating my famiky , that was previously posted on other blogs, was not about Karen, then why in the world have you been dragging her into thus all this time????!!!

The fact tgat I said it is not in question! Why I said it is. I have explainec why, and how it applies several times. The scars on your head are not medical evidence of a surgery.  Any doctor giving you disability on the grounds of that x on your head would be instantly fired and charged with mefical malpractice and defrauding the government. You didnt get disability because your nurse lied about a brain surgery.  Thats a lie. 

Ill tell you what. If you post your disbility paperwork, I'll post my hospital report. What do you say???

Comment by David ofTomorrow 20 hours ago
Delete Comment

Hey Brat, I have a pint of Pistachio ice cream in front of me! Am I lying or not. How can you know????

Likewise, how can you possibly claim to know whether or not I went to the hospital for a rape exam?

Is it jelousy because this would mean that I have a record of abuse, but you dont?

What really would motivate you to claim to know if I have ice cream, or if I went to tge hospital????

Comment by LaBrat 20 hours ago

okay let me see if i've got all this straight:  it was YOUR kids, guts and anus involved in those terrible dissuasions from focussing on mere "imaginary" g-s'ers the way christine, sue, myself and karen were doing, when you were responding to me on christine's blog - why, then karen's out of the loop altogether! it's got nothing to do with her and no longer stands as a barrier to our examining the actual documented truth of the matter together   that part i think i get   and what a relief - the concern that you were hiding behind her personal account was putting me off my form   but, as you already know, there is no need to go into any of this in order to respond honestly to the simple question: do you deny making the statement involving 'you know what'?   the 'nurse' was canada's physician of the year:  but if you haven't even seen the photo, your opinions are inapplicable   as i have recounted the story in detail for you before, why don't you 'clip' some of these alleged statements and remind us?   start with the nurse, please - we wouldn't want to leave the mistaken impression we were prevaricating   people believe in you

Comment by David ofTomorrow 20 hours ago
Delete Comment

Do you realize how dumb you are to say that I don't have a report?  Why in the world woukd I make tgat up????

 Oh, I remember reading about psychological projecting. You thought tgat I would lie about such a thing, because YOU would donexactly tgat yourself! That is why it being a lie is even an option for you. You have no other reason for saying its a lie.

Comment by David ofTomorrow 20 hours ago
Delete Comment

And, how is it that you are upper level mensa without knowing about language mechanics???

You just got caught in a lie!  And you want to change the subject. It is obvious.

Comment by David ofTomorrow 20 hours ago
Delete Comment

It is appearant who is evading. I have explained each of your accusations. Yet you didnt afres anything. 

Lets start with this one question...do you have brain damage?

You know that I have it copied. You wont say yes because of what that means to your ability to function.  But you cant say no because you know I have a copy of you saying yes.

Comment by LaBrat 20 hours ago

the lies, david  this is about the tenth change of evasion already (and still more 'skirting' of the issue)  CAN you address you either pathological or (if NOT so excusable) criminal slanders?   surprise me!   the issue, throughout this "celebration of non-sequiturs", was your denial of your words   that reminds me: on sept 3 you announced that you were getting that 'hospital report'  "immediately"   but i know targets get the slow line   wasn't that what christine was saying the first place?   'channel ducking....and more ridiculousness'  (IF we're allowed to read it - you're VERY sensitive, between your rape threat bouts!)

Comment by David ofTomorrow 21 hours ago
Delete Comment

Can you explain the part where you got disability because your nurse lied about knowing your brain surgery,  yet thefe is no record for her to have known about it, and then you got disability,  because she lied????? 

You have specifically said you got disability because xhelied...NOT because you afe disabled. But, if sge did lie about it....how was it provdn that she lied, if there wrre no fecords of the surgery? Did a current doctor examine the bone of your skull? Thefe would be one repair scars. If bone at all. And, again two strainght lines on top of your head is seperate from the scar above your eye where you formerly claimed to have a lobotomy.  Now how woukd I know tgat you have two scars on your head, the x and the one above your eye, unkess you wrote it for all to read?

It is obvious that the whole lobotomy claim was an attention ploy so you could fit in.

Comment by David ofTomorrow 21 hours ago
Delete Comment

And, YES, the story about my family member being fed to dogs, about my parents being shot while coming to rescue me, about me being raped whike they cut out my guts abd my guts being cut out of my anus, the list goes on and on. I was psychologicaly tortured in the worst of ways. This is from an article tgat I found 

"Rape and other assaults are far more common than generally reported and torture is also common. Common forms of physical torture are beating, electric shock Bed Frame Used for Torture (Cambodia)(increasingly used because no signs are left), burning, asphyxiation, stretching, genital trauma and rape. The bed frame at the right was used to torture prisoners atTuol Sleng Prison in Cambodia. Common forms of psychological torture are threats, isolation, mock execution, forced witnessing of torture or execution, and sleep deprivation. See links below. In some cases, e.g., Serbia and Burma (Myanmar), rape is an institutionalized weapon of war"

These things I went through were docuumented in my blogs and groups years before you came along. Did you stop to think about that possibility,  or did yku rush headlong into saying it didnt apply to me?

Do you still deny tgat I have a medical report for a rape exam request? ?? 

Comment by David ofTomorrow 21 hours ago
Delete Comment

Nd, when it comes to Christine D, who you have volunteered to speak for,

I had mentioned assault by vibrations to my anus. She rplied in an almost joking way, 'ive never heard of remote anal assault! Lol! I *cried*

So, she may have not taken me seriously by use of lol, thus her crying would have been sarcastic. 

Then, she coukd have said it without thinking, but may have been serious about crying. I have fried many times when reading what others go through!  She may have vefy well been crying FOR me and what I went through.

Either way, I dont sed thatvme sayingvthat I get anal assault offended her to the point of crying as you insist. Your view is so outside reality tbat, again, you appear to have brsin damage.

If you doubt this, ask Christine exactly what she meant. Then ask her if she likes you using her name to bash me.

I am willing to bet tgat she tells you not to use her, just like the 6 other members have asked you

Comment by David ofTomorrow 19 hours ago
Delete Comment

All in all I am going over tge whole conversation about your accusation.  When you look at the context, I explain what I meant right there,  because you flipped your lid by misinterpretation.  You, apparently,  are the only one tgat doesnt get it. 

Why? Do you really think tgat you are smarter than everyone else?

Why are you a member of a CIA front site Brat?

Comment by LaBrat 19 hours ago

page two of the aptly named 'channel ducking....and more ridiculousness' (which opens with perps in the store line-up):

"When Karen or anyone else who has to worry about something a little more distressing than how many people are in her aisle at the supermarket, like if her children are being fed to dogs while she is being kept in a cell, or her parents murdered while she is trying to save you, or..."(let's not go there, shall we?)

"When it comes to how many people are in your aisle att the store, or who's peeking around a pole, it might be easier to deal with than worrying about your kids being eaten by dogs"

then we get "I NEVER SAID anything about feeding Karens kids to DOGS!!!!!", and below

"The fact that I said it is not in question!"

now the issue here is your veracity, and it is an issue because i caught you slandering me behind my back with a false accusation (copied, along with your concession before the deed that i was innocent) and then launching slander accusations from different blogs   you have alleged that this is not about Karen or her kids (see below) so that matter should be resolved if we are to believe you   if your friends don't want me to repeat your words when you lie and falsely accuse me of same, perhaps they might encourage you to stop lying, and if you can't do that, then to stop falsely accusing me of lying so i might let these glaring lies pass in silence   but thank you for finally addressing (half of) your contradiction   this behaviour (including several untruths on these pages tonight) is clearly pathological, criminal, or both

Comment by David ofTomorrow 19 hours ago
Delete Comment

Why in the world did you claim to be an upper level mensa member? Tgey wouldn't accept any essay you were to write because your writing mechanics are non existent. 

You really did claim to have a lobotomy.  Even claiming'no no! It is just a lobotomy Scar!' Is a lie because whatever it was, you now admit it wasnt a lobotomy,  so ir cant pissibly be a lobotomy scar..., you are lying when you call it such, its lije me saying this scar on my thumb was a lobotomy scar. It it not true, there was no lobotomy,  so it is not a lobotomy scar. 

But, by your reasoning, or lack thereof,  you show that you DO have brain damage. Most likely because of the frying pan by mother theory. At any rate, adress your brain damage and quit accusing others of ludicrous shit, please. 

Comment by David ofTomorrow 19 hours ago
Delete Comment

To me telling things nice and pretty, yes, I coulda did that.  I am not perfect. I am working on making changes. Note that despite our current exchange I have not called you names or intimidated you in any way.  At any rate, again, I must ask your motive for making such a big deal, when NOONE else is jumping on yout5 bandwagon?

Now can you tell us all if do or do not have brain damage?

Comment by David ofTomorrow 19 hours ago
Delete Comment

Honestly,  I have gone over your statement.  Me saying that I nevef said "anything" is wrong. I didnt intend to say that specifically.  My response was that "I" never 'threatened' to do so, as you had accused. So, I did mis state my intent.  At any rate,  what is your intent? Are you trying to make ne feel bad for mi speaking? Are you trying to make me look bad? I mean, everyone else knows that it wasn't a threat,  so then it was as exampke eery of my own experience. This fact is not lost on others.  They are going, 'Wow. PAUL went through that? He has been through alot more tgan a pole peeker!' 

Comment by David ofTomorrow 19 hours ago
Delete Comment
brat1
brat/
noun
derogatoryhumorous
  1. a child, typically a badly behaved one.
    synonyms: badly behaved child, spoiled child

    At least you pick an appropriate moniker. 

Comment by LaBrat 19 hours ago

talking about someone ELSE feeding her kids to dogs (while she's being distracted by 'g-s') is still saying something about feeding her kids to dogs, if you want to insist on being pedantic about it   you already know that i never claimed you said you yourself were going to do it, but that you had described "Karen's kids being fed to dogs", so the statement "I NEVER SAID anything about feeding Karen's kids to DOGS!!!!!" still applies   (and you DID deny making any such statement)   we clearly distinguished at the time that it was "perps" doing it to her kids and not you   so, are you confused, somehow? contagious brain damage, perhaps?  get real!   you know all this started with me politely suggesting that instead of telling her she was wrong and confused (as were we all - we call that gas-lighting around here), you might try saying that, after all since she was there, maybe she could possibly be right about 'her' experience    but i don't want to trespass on someone else's private life, so we'll leave that right there and get back to the question of well beyond the hour:  do you deny making the statement (about her kids being fed to dogs), and do you deny denying it (your "well I NEVER!" righteous protestations of innocence)   it's probably my brain damage keeping me from seeing how this contradiction has actually been addressed

Comment by David ofTomorrow 19 hours ago
Delete Comment

And it was you who first claimec that I made that statement about her. I said what you posted below after that fact in response to your accusation.

Again, why did you say that Karen is not part of tgat conversation,  when you brought her into it by accusing me of tgreating her kids? Then you say if you and others were present then sge had nothing to do with it...

Upper level mensa members dont come up with stupid shit like that Brat!

Comment by David ofTomorrow 19 hours ago
Delete Comment

Its true, I didnt say anything about feeding Karens kids to dogs. I said that sge or anyone ekse could be in a situation ad I was were you have no idea if the nihhtmare they tell through v2k abd visual insert is real! This perspective can help one to essen anxiety over lesser things. I understand that you didn't get that out of the statement,  but otgers understood my intent.

I think that you are focusing on this because you think repeating it over and over will make me look worse and worse. From what ive been reading, people don't like it. 

Your brain damage is affecting you. It is appearant in the way you write as well as how you process information. You nedd to confront the brain damage issue and then explain to everyone why you are still on peacepink when you think it's a CIA front.

Comment by LaBrat 20 hours ago

(below:)  "The fact that I said it is not in question!" ('spiritualism or technology?':)  "I NEVER SAID anything about feeding Karen's kids to dogs!!!!!"   so which one is 'more' true for you, dotty?   see if you can address this seeming contradiction head on, without going into too many tangents this time - we've taken so long to come only this far, let's not blow it now!   remember when i repeated that two contradictory premises cannot both be valid?  that truism holds even when the statements are yours

Comment by David ofTomorrow 17 hours ago
Delete Comment

If I wrre to ignore you, ylu wluld call me a coward. So I confront you, and you call je a coward....

You are psychological projecting.  You are what you call me. In case your upper half- not upper level, mind cant understand what psychological projecting is

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against unpleasant impulses bydenying their existence in themselves, while attributing them to others.[1] For example, a person who is rude may constantly accuse other people of being rude

Comment by David ofTomorrow 17 hours ago
Delete Comment

This cowarx shit is a lie too. You have never been near me. Never experienced my nature. You mis understand because of admitted brain damage, then expect everyone to follow. Noone is following you. If you inspired people,  Lebowski,  Endless,  Cerrin, would still be here supporting you. All tbose who have asked you to stop, I think its over ten now, would be cheering you on. I know you like to do thus, but you are exposing your lies for all to see.

Comment by David ofTomorrow 17 hours ago
Delete Comment

Ok. You are a liar.  You claimed lobotomy to make an impression because being yourself, with your disability,  had to haveca real cool explanation. ...so lobotomy popped into your head! Problem is, it popped back out when I brought up the side effects. 

Then you claimed brain damage, yet you now completely avoid the word like the plague. Soon, you will claim it was just a brain damage scar,  no real brain damage..., not really upoer level mensa but upper half...soon, and I'm feeling like a prophet,  you will say your not mebsa at all it is just a mensa scar.

Your transparent.  You try and hokd old misinterpretation or even , I admit, my own errors, aver me. The problem for you is, I learn from my mistakes. I know how to grow. The things you talk of will continue to become farther and farther into the forgotten past.  I will grow, in myself nd my relationships. 

You, will wallow in why noone respects you. You are nagative. If you look over your personal blog, you afe posting 95% negativity. Look at your choice of words.mhow many times do you call najes or belittle.  Instead of contstrctive critisism.... you criticize.  If I wsnt spending my time clarifying who you are, noo e would pay attention to this. It is highky unlikely that anyone currently is.  Certainly not the CIA . Thats another one you will leave alone.  You cant continue to excuse your presence if you truly believe this is a CIA frontsite. And continuing to do so puts down Sleilmavus, who was onkine two days ago. Ad well as any otger administrator or moderators,  or any member that appreciate this site. You shit on everyone because you worship a guy who calls you a nutter because you admit to brain damage. Deepthought doesn't think you have an implant,  he has a noninvasive theory. He doesnt believe I. Your understanding of gs...its more like Decas. So I dont know why you refer to him.  Maybe your brain damage is fogging your perception....oh, what was that??? It was just a brain damage scar????

We're not stupid, liar.

Comment by LaBrat 18 hours ago

it is cowardly and dishonest to continue to refuse to address you contradictory statements reprinted below   although the issue is your criminal slander behind my back (how's that for cowardly and dishonest?), it is hard not to see all this (especially when compounded by the sadistic sexual threats so familiar to so many from the little birdies in our ears), as identical to the behaviour of perps on the other end of the machines, in our 'cirlces', and even on-line here    all saying the same b-s as you spout   huh!

Comment by David ofTomorrow 18 hours ago
Delete Comment

Good. You arent upper level mensa. In fact, your not mensa at all. You didnt know what language mechanics are and you said so in front of everyone.  So, now your blog on offering gramnar skills to Deca and I makes You look kinda stupid.  Like you're a liar. 

 Lobotomy,  , lobotomy scar. ..potato, pot t-a-to,.......but you didnt say that tge lobotomy scar didn't also include a lobotomy until i brought up the side effects of a lobotomy.  Suddenly,  you wanted nothing to do with lobotomy.  In fact,  ill bet you leave the word alone in connection with yourself. You will soon claim that you didn't say brain damage, but that you said brain damage scar.....like you said not upper level mensa, just upper half mensa- but I didnt know grammar was language mechanics bullshit.

It gets apearent. You are a compulsive liar.

Comment by LaBrat 18 hours ago

having perused your 'mechanical linguistics' diversionary ploy, i am now grudgingly willing to revise "pathological, criminal or both" to "trolling, actually being exceptionally slow-witted or both"   my 20 percentile in mechanical aptitude involves the concrete, literal, real practical nuts and bolts of mechanical devices   i could never fix a type-writer   but the abstract, metaaphorical and purely symbolic parts of a sentence do not represent any mechanical challenge whatsoever   you are confusing two very different meanings of the word mechanical   think of chess-masters playing with their eyes closed   moving the physical pieces deftly is no advantage here   but not floundering among these 'action words' and 'nouns' etc kind of goes hand in clumsy hand with that 99 in verbal reasoning   i could take that typewriter (once fixed), and make up a better diversion that this one any day   and btw upper half of mensa is way below the "upper levels"   though there are such gifted persons here, it is unlikely that either of us would even recognize it if it weren't rubbed in our face - and that kind of stupid behaviour would probably be beneath them anyway (or at least they could find more interesting pass-times)   but even they realize, as i have repeated every second time you bring it up, that there are different kinds of smart, and/but no apex or objective reference point that encompasses the others   that is what perspective is all about - that thing you don't seem to have    for example - "i am not! - YOU'RE a liar", followed by a bunch of contrived misrepresentations, doesn't make it so   addressing the contradiction might be 'smarter' - or even ceasing the slander   do you deny making the statement? and, do you deny denying it?   if it makes it any easier, they're both quoted on this page for handy reference

Comment by David ofTomorrow 18 hours ago
Delete Comment

Thank you for pisting the dog shit!
I couldn't find it myself.
Let me explain some language mechanics: when I said karen or anyone else. I was referi g to anyone, then when I usec the word 'worry' it implies a concern , not an actual action. So tgere was no tgreat to Kafen, it was a rhetorical exampke basec on my own experience. The admmision you made about not understanding language mechanics is telling. You dont have the language skills to decipher what I meant. This is why you are the onky one going on about it. Can I ask again why you are going on about it? Who is it that you are trying to convince?
And what is the CIA doing to the group whike you are going on anout your misinterpretation of my statement? ??
Mr. Guard, your gonna lose uour job!

Comment by David ofTomorrow 18 hours ago
Delete Comment

Hey Brat! I got a Lamborgini car!!! No I dont have a Lamborgini,  just a Lamborgini 'car'.....

You see, claiming tgat a car is a Lamborgini car, but you dont have a Lamborgini doesn't make sense. Adding thecword car after Lamborgini to excuse the intentional misinformation by adding the word car....

Is like adding the word scar to lobotomy to cover up the fact that you lied about having one in the first place.

Let ne repeat....even calling it a lobotomy scar when you didnt have a lobotomy is deceiving.  The person will assume that tge scar is the result of a lobotomy unless you tell them and ypu didnt tell them that there was no actual lobotomy until i brought up the side effects of lobotomy. 

Remember that childhood lesson about one lie leading to another? Well, you're gonna have to get some lies together about your brain danage claim. I can see you are having regrets tgat you ckaimed to have it....but suck it up. You do have brain damage and you know it. The fyibg pan, or wafgle iron, scar is proof. As much proof as it is of any surgery. Your disability papers pkease??? I tjink you are lying about why you were rewarded disability. Mit had nothing to do with any brain surgery or any nurse lying about it. That kue us so transparent that its pitiable.

Comment by David ofTomorrow 18 hours ago
Delete Comment

Hey Brat, do you remember that blog about offering Deca and me grammer lessons? How can you teach me grammar when you didnt know tgat grammar was a partvof writing or language mechanics???

I think evet everyoneyone knows that upper level mensa claim was as much a lie as both the lobotomy,  and lobotomy scar claims are.

Comment by David ofTomorrow 19 hours ago
Delete Comment

And what is thus about her kids being fed to dogs wjike shex being gangstalked?  I thought you claim that I deny gangstalking.  So how woukd I feed hef kids to dogs whike she was disacted by gs????

You are seriously disturbed. You need some help. Did you get a case manager when they put you on disability? You're not making sense Brat....you neec to talk to someone

Comment by David ofTomorrow 16 hours ago
Delete Comment

Brat has brain damage???? Or not?????

Well????? We're waaaaaiiitttiiiinnnggg........

Comment by David ofTomorrow 16 hours ago
Delete Comment

You are projecting again!

Did you know tgst when you click your cursor on the blue higjlighted itens its a hypetlink? It is painfully appearant that you didnt read that wikpedia article on psychological projecting. 

Comment by LaBrat 17 hours ago

pathological liar?

topic coward?

over-paid troll who just gives the game away with each new lie?

or unbelievably unintelligent and emotionally unsalvageable ass that the site humours out of pity?

only your next cowardly and probably prevarication evasion of addressing your contradictions can tell!

(um, on a personal note, it would be really embarrassing to the entire gist of my efforts here were you to tell the truth - (should i really be telling him this?) - but don't let that stop you now lol!)

Comment by David ofTomorrow 17 hours ago
Delete Comment

I did make a statement about dogs. But you misrepresent that statement,  thus i did NOT make the statement in the fashion your brain damaged mind sees it. Noone else agrees with you. You're alone on this. ...and for a reason.  The context shows clearly that it was  'what if' 'worry' rhetorical , hypothetical situation based upon my experience.  Thats all!

It is only YOU Brat, tgat has misinterpreted the whole affair. 

Only YOU. 

Isn't that telling you something?  

Noone else that has had a brain implant has gotten brain damage...the Dr. fucked uo on your brain job!

Comment by LaBrat 17 hours ago
a did you or did you not make the statement about the dogs?  (b) did you or did you not deny making that same statement? (both statements are quoted below to help you decide)  (c) are we going to re-cycle segues in a ongoing effort to demonstrate our fortitude, courage and honour by acknowledging the contradiction?
Comment by David ofTomorrow 17 hours ago
Delete Comment

This is really funny....what the duck is lobotomy scar supposed to represent if not a lobotomy? ????

Why didnt you clarify that 'understood' lobotomy as not real, just a scar...Until AFTER I brought up lobotomy side effects?

Comment by David ofTomorrow 17 hours ago
Delete Comment

Lobotomy? 

Brain damage?  

Mensa?

Perp diviner?

Where do your lies end?

 What are you going to say when I get off my ass and retrieve the hospital report??

'That's not a report, it just a report scar'   ???

Comment by LaBrat 17 hours ago

i would not call you a coward for addressing the question   "ignoring" me is not the same thing as refusing to address a slander charge   you are being called a coward for (a) threatening women (plural); threatening to send people instead of presenting your alleged self; launching lying false accusations from concealment or places you block responses (ask cedric about that one, braveheart); but mostly, telling these whoppers and REFUSING after all these pages to tackle to contradiction head on   only for that

Comment by David ofTomorrow 17 hours ago
Delete Comment

Gooooood. 

You just keep on projecting........

Comment by LaBrat 17 hours ago

the lies are listed below in order and if it's not cowardice preventing you pulling out that ten foot pole to wave in their general direction, then threatening to send "perps with shotguns" after me, or "cars" after lebowski, or whatever else you said to promt carrin to remark that you are more comfortable threatening women (who are too polite to laugh in your cowardly face) condemns, or 'qualifies' you anyway   do you personally know any one who isn't a coward who idly threatens to 'send someone'?  but all this is yet another cowardly evasion of your lies below (or, 'contradictory premises' remain to be fled)   i "double-dog" dare you to answer the questions of page one - did you make the statement? did you deny it? ha ha!

Comment by David ofTomorrow 16 hours ago
Delete Comment

I have explained it. I said something. You, and Only You, misinterpreted it. So, you now continue to embarrass yourself while others have asked you to stop.

Now, tell us all again how cowardice I am while we review the definition of psychological projecting. 

Comment by LaBrat 16 hours ago

you re trying to explain 'projection' while pretending i am lying as i document your lies   irony, much?   you are insisting i address your diversions while refusing for 7 pages to address your conflicting statements   there may be some irony in there, somewhere, as well   "perspective", remember?  now: "do you deny...?"  

Comment by David ofTomorrow 16 hours ago
Delete Comment

Can I ask what your definition of lower half mensa is? What is your IQ?

Comment by David ofTomorrow 16 hours ago
Delete Comment

Adress the projecting issues you have Brat, you are embarrassing yourself!

Comment by David ofTomorrow 16 hours ago
Delete Comment

Why again is it tgat you  "Bash trolls" that others see as legitimate members??

Honestly,  if the moderators thought Deca or i were trolls,  we wouldn't be here. So your motuve is very, very clear.

You're a bully bolstering your low self-esteem. 

Comment by LaBrat 16 hours ago

"I NEVER SAID anything about feeding Karen's kids to DOGS!!!!!" is a quote, not a brain-damaged misrepresentation   "The fact that is said it is not in question!" and "It is true. I didn't say anything about feeding Karen's kids to dogs."  are also both quotations, freshly authored on these very pages, and not mis-representations   to misrepresent them as misrepresentations is neither honest nor stalwart  

Comment by David ofTomorrow 16 hours ago
Delete Comment

Notice,  Vulnerability,  and Insecurity of the bully being the cause. ..kinda like your admitted low self-esteem issues.

You should study this stuff before you go claiming mensa level of any sort,. Mensa starts at iq of 132. Yours is like 98.

Comment by David ofTomorrow 16 hours ago
Delete Comment

Let me restate this part:

Bullying: A bully may project his/her own feelings of vulnerability onto the target(s) of the bullying activity. Despite the fact that a bully's typically denigrating activities are aimed at the bully's targets, the true source of such negativity is ultimately almost always found in the bully's own sense of personal insecurity and/or vulnerability.[24] Such aggressive projections of displaced negative emotions can occur anywhere from the micro-level of interpersonal relationships, all the way up through to the macro-level of international politics, or even international armed conflict

Comment by David ofTomorrow 16 hours ago
Delete Comment

In case you cant figure it out with tbat upper half mensa mind, heres an excerpt:

Practical examplesEdit

  • Projection of marital guilt: Thoughts of infidelity to a partner may be unconsciously projected in self-defence on to the partner in question, so that the guilt attached to the thoughts can be repudiated or turned to blame instead, in a process linked to denial.[23]
  • Bullying: A bully may project his/her own feelings of vulnerability onto the target(s) of the bullying activity. Despite the fact that a bully's typically denigrating activities are aimed at the bully's targets, the true source of such negativity is ultimately almost always found in the bully's own sense of personal insecurity and/or vulnerability.[24] Such aggressive projections of displaced negative emotions can occur anywhere from the micro-level of interpersonal relationships, all the way up through to the macro-level of international politics, or even international armed conflict.[20]
  • Projection of general guilt: Projection of a severe conscience[25] is another form of defence, one which may be linked to the making of false accusations, personal or political
Comment by David ofTomorrow 16 hours ago
Delete Comment

Can you tell me why deepthought calles you  'nutter' Brat????

Comment by David ofTomorrow 15 hours ago
Delete Comment

Can you tell me why you want to dismiss that whole list concerning yourself while obsessing onna statement I made that you misunderstood because of your admitted lack of knowledge of language mechanics? ?

You feel like you're in quick sand Brat..????

That's what happens to compulsive liars.

Comment by LaBrat 15 hours ago

here you acknowledge one half of your contradiction - there is no denying that my quotation is word perfect, though you did wrongly allege that i was 'misrepresenting' you and seem headed for that same misrepresentation   don't you get dizzy going around in circles so fast?  this was on the last page!  you ALSO denied the statement that i copied   (i copied that too, remember?)   the challenge here is to deal with both sides of your contradiction at the same time, not serially evading them behind each other till your victim gets dizzy   you DON'T understand what language mechanics are if you don't recognize the validity of my sentence structure and semantic clarity   (i have demonstrated punctuation and capitalization proficiency when corresponding with persons for whom this is not the first language, and the 'english lessons for trolls' are conducted in your own language too)   if you are truly so dense that you have forgotten my detailed explication of your misappropriation of the word 'mechanical' as applied beyond mechanics, i should be surprised, and not think it is low-grade perp willful obfuscation (playing even dumber than you really are)   try reading the posts you trash - same as member statements

Comment by David ofTomorrow 15 hours ago
Delete Comment

Can you create paragraphs? 

Can you define mensa?

Comment by David ofTomorrow 15 hours ago
Delete Comment

I mafe the statement that you copied. It clearly stated that it was hypothetical and rhetorical.  The context that you have yet to explain shows this. Everyone else sees this. It is only you who do not. 

Now, quit dismissing the legitimacy o f the list you mentioned. You DO need to address these things. 

Lets start with,  Do you or domyou not have brain damage?

Then, Do you understand what mensa is?

Do you know your IQ?

AND is my IQ higher than yours because I understand what language mechanics are,  and what psychological projecting is?

Ya got some brain damage goin on there ya Brat???

Comment by LaBrat 16 hours ago

dogs, lobotomies, brain damage, brain surgery, lobotomy scars, trolls, name-calling, the c.i.a., my nation, my doctor, my  mother, seeking attention, low self-esteem, the 'mechanics of language', allgations that christine is being "sarcastic" about crying (?!!), my medical records, my fake lobotomy "ploy to fit in", your medical 'records', ice cream, lambrgini, my brattiness, your desperate condition with all you're going through, my "writing mechanics", frying pans, alleged 'admission about not understanding language mechanics", alleged lies, 'avoidance' of your evasive and inflammatory tangents, disability, 'case manager', alleged hero worship of deep thought, his nutter comment about me, mt 'side effects, negativity and criticism and who it deters (which you could end now by addressing your 'contradiction, but i digress), my iq, projection, hyperlinks, "bullying" (after carrin?). vulnerability, bashing, other people and their alleged opinions - all that just to avoid answering two questions?   did you deny the statement?

Comment by David ofTomorrow 16 hours ago
Delete Comment

Heres the opening quote; 

Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against unpleasant impulses bydenying their existence in themselves, while attributing them to others.[1] For example, a person who is rude may constantly accuse other people of being rude

Once again brainiac!! How many ways do you want to describe my cowardice????

Comment by David ofTomorrow 16 hours ago
Delete Comment

Who is it you Bashing,  and Why????

Comment by David ofTomorrow 16 hours ago
Delete Comment

Let me restate this part:

Bullying: A bully may project his/her own feelings of vulnerability onto the target(s) of the bullying activity. Despite the fact that a bully's typically denigrating activities are aimed at the bully's targets, the true source of such negativity is ultimately almost always found in the bully's own sense of personal insecurity and/or vulnerability.[24] Such aggressive projections of displaced negative emotions can occur anywhere from the micro-level of interpersonal relationships, all the way up through to the macro-level of international politics, or even international armed conflict

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

Comment by David ofTomorrow 16 hours ago
Delete Comment

And I am not "trying to explain psychological projecting" as you put it. Wikipedia does that just fine. Did you not understand it? 

Why not? It was clear to me, no try to explain about it. I think anyone with a higher IQ than YOU will understand what the Wikipedia article points out.

Do you want to tell j5e again how much of a coward i am? ???

Comment by David ofTomorrow 16 hours ago
Delete Comment

Your IQ?????

Comment by David ofTomorrow 15 hours ago
Delete Comment

Can you tell me why you want to dismiss that whole list concerning yourself while obsessing onna statement I made that you misunderstood because of your admitted lack of knowledge of language mechanics? ?

You feel like you're in quick sand Brat..????

That's what happens to compulsive liars.

Comment by LaBrat 15 hours ago

here you acknowledge one half of your contradiction - there is no denying that my quotation is word perfect, though you did wrongly allege that i was 'misrepresenting' you and seem headed for that same misrepresentation   don't you get dizzy going around in circles so fast?  this was on the last page!  you ALSO denied the statement that i copied   (i copied that too, remember?)   the challenge here is to deal with both sides of your contradiction at the same time, not serially evading them behind each other till your victim gets dizzy   you DON'T understand what language mechanics are if you don't recognize the validity of my sentence structure and semantic clarity   (i have demonstrated punctuation and capitalization proficiency when corresponding with persons for whom this is not the first language, and the 'english lessons for trolls' are conducted in your own language too)   if you are truly so dense that you have forgotten my detailed explication of your misappropriation of the word 'mechanical' as applied beyond mechanics, i should be surprised, and not think it is low-grade perp willful obfuscation (playing even dumber than you really are)   try reading the posts you trash - same as member statements

Comment by David ofTomorrow 15 hours ago
Delete Comment

Can you create paragraphs? 

Can you define mensa?

Comment by David ofTomorrow 15 hours ago
Delete Comment

I mafe the statement that you copied. It clearly stated that it was hypothetical and rhetorical.  The context that you have yet to explain shows this. Everyone else sees this. It is only you who do not. 

Now, quit dismissing the legitimacy o f the list you mentioned. You DO need to address these things. 

Lets start with,  Do you or domyou not have brain damage?

Then, Do you understand what mensa is?

Do you know your IQ?

AND is my IQ higher than yours because I understand what language mechanics are,  and what psychological projecting is?

Ya got some brain damage goin on there ya Brat???

Comment by LaBrat 16 hours ago

dogs, lobotomies, brain damage, brain surgery, lobotomy scars, trolls, name-calling, the c.i.a., my nation, my doctor, my  mother, seeking attention, low self-esteem, the 'mechanics of language', allgations that christine is being "sarcastic" about crying (?!!), my medical records, my fake lobotomy "ploy to fit in", your medical 'records', ice cream, lambrgini, my brattiness, your desperate condition with all you're going through, my "writing mechanics", frying pans, alleged 'admission about not understanding language mechanics", alleged lies, 'avoidance' of your evasive and inflammatory tangents, disability, 'case manager', alleged hero worship of deep thought, his nutter comment about me, mt 'side effects, negativity and criticism and who it deters (which you could end now by addressing your 'contradiction, but i digress), my iq, projection, hyperlinks, "bullying" (after carrin?). vulnerability, bashing, other people and their alleged opinions - all that just to avoid answering two questions?   did you deny the statement?

Comment by David ofTomorrow 16 hours ago
Delete Comment

Heres the opening quote; 

Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against unpleasant impulses bydenying their existence in themselves, while attributing them to others.[1] For example, a person who is rude may constantly accuse other people of being rude

Once again brainiac!! How many ways do you want to describe my cowardice????

Comment by David ofTomorrow 16 hours ago
Delete Comment

Who is it you Bashing,  and Why????

Comment by David ofTomorrow 16 hours ago
Delete Comment

Let me restate this part:

Bullying: A bully may project his/her own feelings of vulnerability onto the target(s) of the bullying activity. Despite the fact that a bully's typically denigrating activities are aimed at the bully's targets, the true source of such negativity is ultimately almost always found in the bully's own sense of personal insecurity and/or vulnerability.[24] Such aggressive projections of displaced negative emotions can occur anywhere from the micro-level of interpersonal relationships, all the way up through to the macro-level of international politics, or even international armed conflict

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

Comment by David ofTomorrow 16 hours ago
Delete Comment

And I am not "trying to explain psychological projecting" as you put it. Wikipedia does that just fine. Did you not understand it? 

Why not? It was clear to me, no try to explain about it. I think anyone with a higher IQ than YOU will understand what the Wikipedia article points out.

Do you want to tell j5e again how much of a coward i am? ???

Comment by David ofTomorrow 16 hours ago
Delete Comment

Your IQ?????

Comment by David ofTomorrow 6 hours ago
Delete Comment

3) you claim that I dont really have a girlfriend, then you proceed to ask if I gave her a drug speach. First, why I. The world would you claim that I didnt have a girlfriend?  And if you believe that i didn't,  why then did you ask me if I gave her a drug speach?

4) you also claim.....That I Dont Have a Daughter!!!!!! WTF man! Ive had the same daughter for 19 years now!! 

Why in the world would you claim that its a lie??? I have mentioned my daughter throughout my time on peacepink. 

5) you invoke Deca as an authority, because he called me a shill,  so you say it Must be true. He has called you the very same thing! So, according to your upper percentage mensa reasoning, YOU Are aShill, TOO!!

This whole paragraph is a condensed version of your whoke. You do nothing but lie, blatantly and without foundation. Your motive is to put others down in order to build your self esteem.  You psychological project constantly. 

Ill find more....

Comment by David ofTomorrow 6 hours ago
Delete Comment

Remember this????

Comment by LaBrat on July 24, 2014 at 2:58am

"I think the fact that you eithet have had, or you believe you have had,  two brain surgeries including a lobotomy."   your punctuation is passable, anyway, but the rest is gibberish   there is no verb in the principle clause   also, you have just finished telling us all, based on your deductive omniscience, that i did NOT have a lobotomy    furthermore, the incomplete sentence as stands does not actually make a point   with my 'brain damage' i scored a 99 percentile in verbal reasoning aptitude (they don't award 100) and am in the upper percentages of mensa    perhaps this is what draws my attention to the fact that you've been pretending to smoke crack in your personal spiel as an INDUCEMENT to real targets, to 'naturalize' the epidemic and make it seem 'ok' because one of our 'featured contributors' does it   with the lobotomy references you are again relying on 'ad hominem' to ignore my point (you keep using the phrase - this is how it actually applies)   or maybe just cuz you're clearly not very bright   you've had lots of time to change your posts and take down that bit about doing crack (like it would matter that your "handlers approve of your choice" of pot - get real!)   and we both know you have been claiming to smoke crack, when i first accused you (since, sa deca himself points out, you ARE a shill) of tricking memebers by 'naturalizing' the addiction you did NOT deny it   and since you are as deca rightly observes a "shill" for the evil industry attacking us, you don't have a daughter, or a "beautiful intelligent g-f into drugs" either    you will notice, or someone with better communication skills may point out, that even without capitals or periods, my meaning is fairly clear here     has deca retracted the accusation?  is HE a shill, then, to accuse you 'falsely'?   lyn, big 'l' and others have had their posts have been changed or deleted after posting, so i imagine you have taken the crack reference down before saying these lies   but others will have seen it too   but anyway if you're going to insist after the above that your english is fine - you are beyond my help anyway   have you spoken to "her" about the long-term consequences of the recreational use of harder substances?   or are you okay with that too?   let me simplify this to your level   i'll even punctuate:  Deca calls you a shill and has resisted my dozen opportunities to retract it - so everything you say is automatically suspect.  Your attempt to accuse me falsely behind my back and invoke the F.B.I. is typical - you conceded BEFORE your accusation that you were "wrong" about interpreting some vague threat in my words - THEN accused me abyway.  This alone makes your lying apparent to anyone who can read.  Have a nice day, officer

I have some questions about things you say.

1) you repeatedly say that I refer to my constant crack use, with the motive tgat I am trying to get otgers to use it, what makes you say this??? I havent smoked crack in years, and when I did it, I didnt pay for it, because I didn't like it. This accusation is a bold, blatant lie without ANY foundation. 

2) you say tgat I had weeks earlier said tgat I smoked meth recently.  Thus is another lie. I hsd smoked meth in the past before knowing I was a TI.

To be continued. ...

Comment by LaBrat 14 hours ago

which came first - the egg-head, or the 'chicken'? if you read carefully, you'll see that the issue of your lying (see page one) precedes your valiant 'run' of evasive denial and track-covering   i've also just reminded you that the answers to all your diversion follow immediately on the 'heels' of your admission    now as carrin points out you are very brave threatening women (plural) - so how about a little honest gumption with taking on those two simple questions about your 'statement denial' and 'denial denial'? 

if needs be i will reiterate that the issue is your lying slanders delivered behind my back - if you're NOT also lying here (in opposite directions, but two lies don't make even one half-truth), this is a GREAT opportunity to prove it by showing, if you can and dare, you have not been lying chronically, as all your serial misrepresentations seem to indicate 

alternatively, since after all we've been asked to work it out together, you might try stopping the slander (that would be in case you did not prefer to have me spend my time filling sidebar with denials of one lie after another)   your first post here contains two lies right out of the gate:  you allege that my repetition of the ffchs debunking site is a response to your b-s, when it precedes it by weeks;  you also allege that i posted a blog and blocked people, which i don't even know how to do   those two outright lies are your first comment!  

if you want to diss members testimonies, i am happy to say my piece (point that out) and go my way   but as you have continued your false allegations (ironically, of "slander") as you have now done on daily journal and icaact phase III, then it would not be very prudent of me to sit by and not observe, collect,  collate and analyze each and every other one of your misrepresentations, semantic evasions, false accusations, deliberate obfuscations, outright lies...just compiling the list is tiresome!   (and vaguely nauseating, too)   but you make it all so very necessary   if you retract both false allegations at their source i'll give you some respite, revocable upon future misbehaviours   until that moment every single lie you tell on this site is going to be collected as evidence of my innocence   i did ask you to play nice more than once, you know   and no, you have not "addressed the issue"   do you deny making the statement yes or no? good grief!

Comment by David ofTomorrow 14 hours ago
Delete Comment

Ive repeatedly adressed the issue. The amazing thing is how many legitimate points I brought up that you skirt. Members arent stupid...or CIA. 

Why afe you here if this is a CIA SITE?  See this could go on forever.  The only reason I do it is because people are seeing you expose yourself.  

The more you call a person something,  tbe more you shos tgats how you feel about yourself.  I will post a nlog about psychological projecting,  and what it says about bullies. Tgey can decide for themselves who is a coward and why.

Comment by David ofTomorrow 15 hours ago
Delete Comment

You are the only one tgat has misinterpreted it.

Thix is appearant. 

This is as well.....you know that you are wrong.  You cant not know it because it is ssy so clear.  So, your motive for continuing on this path,  is to avoid the long list that you yourself mentioned.

This is getting pathetic.

Comment by LaBrat 15 hours ago

you have just made over sixty comments tonight without even once tackling this challenge honestly   it is obvious that this is because you know you are lying   there can be no confusion after so much detail   what i wonder is, why do you bother?  must i remind you again of your statement, your denial, your statement that there was never any question that you made the statement, and your subsequent denial of that by repeating the initial denial?  or will you stop your cowardly, lying slandering once and for all? 

Comment by LaBrat 15 hours ago

i'm getting dizzy counting your twists and turns   did you make the statement?  did you deny it?   don't you recall that both sides of this glaring prevarication are written (and quoted) below in your own words?  it LOOKS pathological, but it's also the same evasive 'path' a troll would take  it is not brave to duck it

Comment by David ofTomorrow 15 hours ago
Delete Comment

Ya gettin dizzy Brat??? Tryin to cover your tracks has got you goin in circles. I am just pointing those circles out to everyone! !

Comment by LaBrat 15 hours ago

i'll be happy to examine any distraction you like after you've addressed the contradiction between the statement you have denied, the allegation below that you never denied it (denied denying), and then denied again (would that make it 'denied denying denying?' - no wonder i'm getting dizzy lol)   by "addressed the contradiction", as i'm sure you realize by now, i mean admit you lied when you denied it   once that happy task has been resolved and the issue of your lying false accusations recorded in main room chat are put into proper context in terms of your additional slander on other blogs, we can just forget about the whole thing  (until you sneakily slander me from another concealed location)   peace!

Comment by David ofTomorrow 15 hours ago
Delete Comment

Now...try creating a paragraph transition.

Do you happen to remember how many members have said they refuse to read your posts because you can't write properly?? I remember three myself.  Its kinda hard to get a message across when people can't understand your writing.  It would be in your best interest to display some language mechanics. Your readerscare dropping like flies because your shit is unintelligible.  The only reason I understand it,  is because I have studied linguistics


Comment by LaBrat on August 9, 2014 at 2:52pmDelete Comment

ddavid who are these t. i.'s who go around telling other t. i.'s that you are wrong in your

RSS

Latest Activity

Soleilmavis replied to Soleilmavis's discussion Lawsuits of mind control victims
2 hours ago
Gordana Filipovic posted a blog post

Letter to Mr. Mark Zuckerberg

 Dear Soleilmavis, I remind you of yours words: “Please keep faith and keep working! Together, we will make a difference!”As for your letter to the President of the United States I must say that it is also my idea. If we write to certain people, famous people, the excuse that they were uninformed will no longer exist! I am glad you wrote to President Biden, I am looking forward to the return of democracy in the United States. I hope the hopes will not be betrayed in the future.Continuing your…See More
9 hours ago
Gordana Filipovic liked Soleilmavis's blog post Soleilmavis' Letter to President Joe Biden
11 hours ago
Robin Yan replied to Robin Yan's discussion They are so afraid of this. They are now filtering, hacking and hiding it, including all my passwords . So, everything is undoubtedly true. Please forward it to "them" .
"What UN Human Rights Chief said. What they are doing. Please send for me too important. UN ICCPR UN Human Rights UN Human Rights Council Amnesty International International Bar Association International Criminal Court Canadian Government Cc…"
15 hours ago
Robin Yan posted a blog post

What UN Human Rights Chief said. What they are doing. Please send for me too important.

UN ICCPR UN Human Rights UN Human Rights Council Amnesty International International Bar Association International Criminal Court Canadian GovernmentCc :CP@ohchr.orgcat@ohchr.orgpetitions@ohchr.orgYears ago, former UN Human Rights chief said this below after I contacted her. And they at once hacked  what I uploaded :https://ibb.co/Y03CtXJOr,…See More
15 hours ago
Modd replied to Xuthal's discussion Covid-19 and activism
"What's up, beautiful people. Did you know that CBD products are pretty good medicine when it comes to dealing with stress? Stress in your organism can cause insomnia, headaches, and migraines. And if you need relief then this remedy would be…"
17 hours ago
sewa bus medan posted a blog post

sewa bus pariwisata medan

aulia travel adalah penyedia persewaan bus charter terkemuka di Sumatera Utara. Jika sewa hiace medan perlu mencarter transportasi ke mana pun di Sumatera Utara, aulia travel memiliki apa yang sewa bus pariwisata medan butuhkan untuk mengantarkan Anda dan penumpang Anda dari A ke B. Rangkaian rental bus pariwisata medan kami yang terjangkau dan dapat diandalkan mulai dari bus mini untuk kelompok sewa minibus…See More
yesterday
Soleilmavis posted a blog post

Soleilmavis' Letter to President Joe Biden

The United States got a new president: Joe Biden, but all the victims, who had been working hard to urge the governments to investigate the secret abuse and torture with electromagnetic mind control technologies for the past twenty years, need to continue hard. The following open letter used to write to President Barack Obama and Donald Trump, and it is now to President Joe Biden.President Joe BidenThe White House1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington DC 20500 Dear President Joe Biden,I am…See More
yesterday

Badge

Loading…

© 2021   Created by Soleilmavis.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service