WHAT DO DARPA WANT WITH OUR BRAINS.
Posted by
u/chudslayer
What Do DARPA Want With Our Brains?
Excerpt from COVID-19: A Web Of Corruption, by “Spartacus”:
In 2020, a Harvard scientist by the name of Charles Lieber was indicted by the DOJ on charges of making false statements. He had taken money from China’s Thousand Talents Plan, against the terms of his DOD grants. Charles Lieber received grants from DARPA, ONR, AFOSR, NIH, and MITRE, but he also double-dipped and took money from the CCP, hence the charges against him.
Justice.gov: Harvard University Professor Indicted on False Statement Charges
Charles Lieber worked under a cover story. He claimed to be working on silicon nanowire batteries for the Chinese, but no one can recall him ever working on batteries of any kind.
Science: Why did a Chinese university hire Charles Lieber to do battery research?
Charles Lieber’s research actually involves something called bionanotechnology, which is the Frankensteinian blending of living tissue with artificial components (i.e. semiconductors, quantum dots, nanoparticles, synthetic polymers, et cetera), on the molecular level.
Charles Lieber’s own papers explicitly describe the potential for his silicon nanowires to be used as biosensors, or even as brain-computer interfaces, (also known as brain-machine interfaces, or, in cyberpunk science fiction parlance, “neural laces”):
Harvard: Nanowire probes could drive high-resolution brain-machine interfaces
How is this relevant to COVID-19? Charles Lieber is a colleague of Robert Langer, one of the co-founders of Moderna. The two of them are pictured here, left and right, with Daniel Kohane in the center.
These three worked on a paper together to create cybernetic heart tissue scaffolds with biosensor functionality.
Harvard: Cyborg Tissue Monitors Cells
Elon Musk’s Neuralink presentation made waves when people started to consider the human applications, but even Neuralink is as barbaric as trephination next to the military’s craniotomy-free, wireless nanoparticle BCI research.
Enter DARPA’s BRAIN Initiative, and the N3 (Next-Generation Nonsurgical Neurotechnology) program.
DARPA: Next-Generation Nonsurgical Neurotechnology
The grant proposal for N3 is very informative on the nature of the technology desired by DARPA:
DARPA: Broad Agency Announcement Next-Generation Non-Surgical Neurotechnology (N3) BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES OFFICE HR001118S0029
TA2 involves the development of a system that includes a nanotransducer placed on or near neurons of interest and an integrated sensor/stimulator device that sits outside the skin. The nanotransducer may include technologies such as, but not limited to, self-assembled/molecular/biomolecular/chemical nanoparticles, or viral vectors. These nanotransducers must be delivered in a minutely invasive (nonsurgical) manner, which may include ingestion, injection, or nasal administration, and involve technology that includes self-assembly inside the body. While the major TA2 goals of developing neural read out and write in capabilities are similar to the goals from TA1, creating a nanotransducer with an optimal delivery route to the brain is a major additional component. Another major component of TA2 is achieving cell-type specificity.
There are six teams involved in the N3 program; Battelle, Carnegie Mellon University, Johns Hopkins University’s Applied Physics Laboratory, PARC, Rice University, and Teledyne.
How close are they to achieving their goal?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cL3e8tC8TwE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZRkfBsTTt8
Magnetism Plays Key Roles in DARPA Research to Develop Brain-Machine Interface without Surgery
Nature: Wireless and battery-free technologies for neuroengineering
Very close.
Incidentally, the head of Battelle’s N3 team, Gaurav Sharma, was also involved in DTRA’s Blood-Brain Barrier Program. Yes, the very same Defense Threat Reduction Agency that funded EcoHealth Alliance.
What did that program seek to accomplish?
Defense Threat Reduction Agency’s Chemical and Biological Technologies Department: Early Successes of DTRA’s Blood-Brain Barrier Program Suggest New Countermeasures
The program aims to understand the effects of nerve agents and alphaviruses on the blood-brain barrier and find new transport pathways to deliver appropriate therapeutics into the CNS. The early successes of JSTO’s program allows researchers to better assess the risks of emerging threats while enhancing their ability to protect and treat warfighters from a broad range of chemical and biological threats.
That’s interesting. What does SARS-CoV-2 Spike, the supposed constituent of the vaccine, do to people’s blood-brain barrier?
Elsevier: The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein alters barrier function in 2D static and 3D microfluidic in-vitro models of the human blood–brain barrier
Huh. The SARS-CoV-2 Spike S1 subunit is capable of permeabilizing the blood-brain barrier, opening it up for substances that might want to cross from the bloodstream to the brain.
So, how does all this wireless neural lace business work? It’s actually both very complex and surprisingly simple. Nanoparticles that are sensitive to RF, electromagnetism, ultrasound, and/or light are introduced into brain cells, and then, an external encoder/decoder stimulates them wirelessly and reads back the response. It is very much like turning the human brain into a Wacom pen. You know how a Wacom tablet works, right? The tablet generates a field that the pen converts into an electric current by wireless induction. That’s why the pens don’t need batteries, and it’s why nanotransducers implanted in the brain don’t need them, either.
Shortly after the Spartacus Letter was posted on ZeroHedge, this absolutely ridiculous CNBC video was published on YouTube:
CNBC: Why It’s Impossible to Put Tracking Microchips In Covid Vaccines
How small are nanotransducers, actually?
Well, here’s one of Battelle’s Magnetoelectric Nanotransducers, as seen under an electron microscope.
It’s about 20 nanometers across, much smaller than the 120 nanometer diameter of a SARS-CoV-2 virion, and comparable to transistor gate sizes.
To put this in perspective, the inside diameter of a vaccine needle of average gauge is about 0.26 millimeters. That’s 260,000 nanometers.
13,000 Magnetoelectric Nanotransducers could fit through a vaccine needle side-by-side.
You see, BCIs capable of two-way communication with a human brain don’t just give you superpowers, or let you control drones with your mind, or listen to Katy Perry without headphones or speakers or whatever. They can also be used to manipulate mood, and for social control.
They could also be used to take away people’s agency and turn them into, essentially, biological robots, utterly obedient to government and open to any manner of sadistic abuse.
This is not an exaggeration. It is a fact.
Profound behavioral changes have already been observed in patients with DBS electrodes implanted in their heads. How far could they go if they had access to fine-grained stimulation of individual clusters of neurons?
A bioethicist by the name of Dr. James Giordano (who is well-acquainted with DARPA’s research) is very concerned about all of this. That’s why he gives horrifying lectures in front of West Point cadets like this one: https://youtu.be/N02SK9yd60s
Are they already wargaming the military applications of weaponized neuroS/T, investigating the possibility of using nanoparticles to attack rival powers by making their own citizens go berserk? Yes, of course they are.
Naturally, this sort of escalation of neuroscience to the level of a new arms race will create all kinds of insane justifications in the minds of policymakers and intelligence officials. Populist unrest can be recast as inauthentic, the result of undetectable enemy action. Dissidents can be rounded up and injected with mind-control nanoparticles to make them friendly to the state again, and to cure whatever the Russian or Chinese nanoparticles did to them to make them get so upset and wave signs in the street in the first place.
I ask you, the reader, is this a world you want to live in? One where governments see your own body, your own mind, as not off-limits for direct tampering to achieve military and political objectives? A world where maniacs describe your own body, your own flesh and blood, not as something sacrosanct, but as little more than “the contested domain” of a new type of warfare that you never even knew existed?
No. We say no.
If governments are crossing this line, then they have become the enemies of all mankind.
Its not just DARPA for their military use. But intelligence agency like the CIA already using these technology and its operational around the globe.. mostly for intelligence collection directly from targeted brain, direct mind destruction or assasination method by purposely plant negative emotion to target in order for the target to kill themself and for clandestine purpose.
They can control people who have been exposed and 'infected' with these tech.. move them around, arouse their emotion, create false gesture, force speech.. if this tech is already on your brain. They can control your entirely life.. this the future we are living right now. And yet no limit or regulation has been imposed to control the use of this covert technology.
I obtained the above information at the following online link https://www.reddit.com/r/WayOfTheBern/comments/t39a13/what_do_darpa_want_with_our_brains/
I and many other Irish people are long term victims of non-consensual brain and body experimentation and this experimentation is being conducted on us by remote means by neuro operatives who remain unknown to us.
My name is gretta fahey and my address is Newbrook, Claremorris, Co. Mayo, Eircode F12 Y560, Republic of Ireland. My email address is grettafahey3@gmail.com.
Comments