Posted by johnnytrial on September 20, 2012 at 10:12pm
6 James Howell233 fishing creek rd.NCM NJ08204September 17, 2012docket #1:12cv03275RMBLD.R.B.A->1.) Detective. ,or "Staff Seargant" Rob Miller falsified or fabricated information about his interview with James Howell at the Cape May Troop #3 administrative building on October 27, 20091.) Detective Miller stated Mr.Howell was aggresive and challenged him during that interview.2.) Mr.Howell was read his Miranda rights.3.) The interogation or interview was audio tape recorded by Detective Miller.4.) Detective Miller committed perjury at a sworn under oath testimony as a witness against Mr.Howell at a judicial post termination proceeding that was sworn under oath,transcribed and audio recorded.Proceeding was held at the Vincent Julia Building Delaware Memorial Bridge on July 12, 2010. This is a violation of18 U.S.C. § 1001Exhibit#1- report by detective Miller that states he audio recorded Mr.Howell at 15:06 hours on October 27th 2009.2.Exhibit#2- actual pages of Detective Millers sworn under oath testimony as a witness against Mr.Howell at the post termination judicial hearing on July 12,2010.The proceeding was held at the Vincent Julia building at the Delaware Memorial Bridge.3.) Exhibit#3- subpoena for the audio tape recording from the D.R.B.A police records and evidence department.1.-a) Thie subpoena is evidence that Detective Miller committed perjury and falsified what occured when he interviewed Mr.Howell.4.)exhibit #4-audio tape recording on compact discWith a detail explanationThis is in the courts possesion.This is evidence that supports Mr.Howells complaint.It identifies the coercive actions by the D.R.B.AThe recording is evidence that Mr.Howell is not a threat.-5.) Mr.Howell received the decision from his post termination hearing in August 2010.That document contained a forged or false signature.Hearing panelist Mr.Richard Fressettos signature was not authentic.The signature was a cut out from a document and was glued in the place of his signature.Mr.Howell has provided a picture of that document.The court has that document. It will be labeled asExhibit #5-5.) Mr.Howell received the decision from his post termination hearing in August 2010.That document contained a forged or false signature.Hearing panelist Mr.Richard Fressettos signature was not authentic.The signature was a cut out from a document and was glued in the place of his signature.Mr.Howell has provided a picture of that document.The court has that document. It will be labeled asExhibit #56.) The document that theD.R.B.A attorney Mr.Cook provided in his previous attempt to "motion to dismiss" Mr.Howells Complaint the decision with three hearing panelist Mr.Richard Fressetto signature has two lines underneath it,the other two have one line underneath them.This document is evidence listed as exhibit #6The Forged judicial signatureIs in violation of18 USC § 505 - Seals of courts; signatures of judges or court officersD.R.B.A attorney Mr.Cook has violated 18 U.S.C. § 1001 : US Code - Section 1001: by submitting the. A copy of a document that contains a forged signature.The D.R.B.A abuse of police power, and post-termination judicial proceeding was amalicious abuse of process; Violations of 42 U.S.C. 1983:VIolation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 :Mr.Howell was denied access to his records from Nj Dept of Homeland security NJ OPRA REQUEST #W6500. on April 26, 2012 ,Mr Howell received assistance from the NJ Government records council to appeal the denial of access to his records and mediate for themMr.Howell was still denied mediation and access.to those records that final decision June 29, 2012
Comments