Caughing and car honking used to discourage thoughts and actions

In the past few years, I've noticed an interesting phenomenon.

When I am about to do something out of the ordinary, someone will caugh, and it automatically makes me think I'm not supposed to do what I'm about to do. Same with my thoughts.

This also happens with car honking. I believe it may be more than just a coincidence.

Originally, this was something people did consciously. They would say something between two fake coughs to "covertly" indicate something to someone else, or they would cough when someone said something weird, out of discomfort.

If you look at a sitcom, you may notice that coughing can be heard in the laugh track, sometimes in synchrony with a strange comment made by a character. "Intentional" caughing by characters also happens in this way.

I myself used to try to control my coughs so that I didn't reveal anything about myself by caughing at the wrong time when I was with others, or didn't interrupt them in the middle of a sentence, etc.

I tried to control their reaction to my cough by caughing at the right time, because I was fearful.

I have come to realize that this may have been one way in which I was contributing to this mechanism involving covertly-imposed discouragement of thoughts and actions.

What do you think?

Love, Daniel

Oijia, have you studied deeepthought's ideas? He has some very interesting theories on how the enemy uses satellites to read our thoughrs without implants. This is interesting and important in that it supports the reality that there is no need for implants. This in turn means anyone at anytime can be monitored and controlled. This explains why strangers around us say and do things concerning us without even realizing it. These strangers aren't Stasi. And dont even realize what they say and do.

Im not understanding how some will support the idea of synthetic telepathy when it is offered from deepthought, yet they do not know how the reality of synthetic telepathy is actually applied. For somecreason their theory is that even though synthetic telepathy exists, gangstalking must be accomplished through archaic means. Why the enemy would create such a powerful device as a mind reading/control machine, then NOT USE IT, in deference to a bunch of people who need to becpaid, could become whistle-blower, etc. Etc....plus the logistcs. Lebowxki once said ge believed tgat 60% oc the world populace was gangstalkers. Tgat woukd mean tgat in a city of 1 million tgere would be 600,000 stalkers! I live in a city about that size and I dint see anyone stalking anyone! This idea of mass stalkers doesnt fitvthe profike of a highly advanced technical agency that can see what you see, hear what you hear, feel what you fee.

Tgese are realities. Many of uscare aware of this while otgers deny them as impossible. Thisr who can understand these thruths are better equiped for success. Success will not be had by the simpletons who cannot see past their noses. I personally am looking deeply into scientific theory for an answer to the problem we face. Through my study of advancing technology, I am becoming aware of what kind of mindset our enemy has. Have an idea of what the are currently doing with this tech, and where they are planning on going. The things we think about as a group are the product young children in comparison to what our enemy thinks. This does not mean that we cannot succeed, but it does mean that as a group we need to grow and advance in our thinking, and our approach to the problem.

One thing I suggest is to, as a group, petition our enemy directly, on a regular basis. It wouls6 be proactive on our part. If we did it in concert, it woukd be a great statement to our enemies. The results coukd vary, but there are some advantages.....we dont have to convince them that what they do is real because tgey are the ones doing it. It would becan act of organizing tgat could carry our interests into the future. In all reality, wd dont know how the organizatonal factirs involved will change over time. The existing agency could fracture, or could be overtaken by another. Things may begin to take place in other ways. Ifcee are already organized and are accostumed to communicating our needs as an organization, then we would be far ahead.

There is simply the reality that diplomacy may be one of the greatest possibilities that we have, and I NEVER heard any of us discuss it. Many of us are too busy deciding for ourselves who is and isn't a TI or perp. Its not too hard to figure out which of us will remain slaves forever.

You need to be a member of Peacepink3 to add comments!

Join Peacepink3

Comments

David ofTomorrow September 2, 2014 at 5:04am

Oijia, have you studied deeepthought's ideas? He has some very interesting theories on how the enemy uses satellites to read our thoughrs without implants. This is interesting and important in that it supports the reality that there is no need for implants. This in turn means anyone at anytime can be monitored and controlled. This explains why strangers around us say and do things concerning us without even realizing it. These strangers aren't Stasi. And dont even realize what they say and do.

Im not understanding how some will support the idea of synthetic telepathy when it is offered from deepthought, yet they do not know how the reality of synthetic telepathy is actually applied. For somecreason their theory is that even though synthetic telepathy exists, gangstalking must be accomplished through archaic means. Why the enemy would create such a powerful device as a mind reading/control machine, then NOT USE IT, in deference to a bunch of people who need to becpaid, could become whistle-blower, etc. Etc....plus the logistcs. Lebowxki once said ge believed tgat 60% oc the world populace was gangstalkers. Tgat woukd mean tgat in a city of 1 million tgere would be 600,000 stalkers! I live in a city about that size and I dint see anyone stalking anyone! This idea of mass stalkers doesnt fitvthe profike of a highly advanced technical agency that can see what you see, hear what you hear, feel what you fee.

Tgese are realities. Many of uscare aware of this while otgers deny them as impossible. Thisr who can understand these thruths are better equiped for success. Success will not be had by the simpletons who cannot see past their noses. I personally am looking deeply into scientific theory for an answer to the problem we face. Through my study of advancing technology, I am becoming aware of what kind of mindset our enemy has. Have an idea of what the are currently doing with this tech, and where they are planning on going. The things we think about as a group are the product young children in comparison to what our enemy thinks. This does not mean that we cannot succeed, but it does mean that as a group we need to grow and advance in our thinking, and our approach to the problem.

One thing I suggest is to, as a group, petition our enemy directly, on a regular basis. It wouls6 be proactive on our part. If we did it in concert, it woukd be a great statement to our enemies. The results coukd vary, but there are some advantages.....we dont have to convince them that what they do is real because tgey are the ones doing it. It would becan act of organizing tgat could carry our interests into the future. In all reality, wd dont know how the organizatonal factirs involved will change over time. The existing agency could fracture, or could be overtaken by another. Things may begin to take place in other ways. Ifcee are already organized and are accostumed to communicating our needs as an organization, then we would be far ahead.

There is simply the reality that diplomacy may be one of the greatest possibilities that we have, and I NEVER heard any of us discuss it. Many of us are too busy deciding for ourselves who is and isn't a TI or perp. Its not too hard to figure out which of us will remain slaves forever.

This reply was deleted.