Let me give myanalysis as to what types of remote feed back may be received by thosesending TIs V2K so we might get a better sense as to why we hear it inthe first place. First they do need
input to judge the V2K isworking especially when thru-wall
or microwave hearing. One methodis passive or active millimeter wave
surveillance technology. Theycan read our breathing and heartrates
with this type of technology alone with whether or notwe sweat.
http://tinyurl.
com/2alh44u
go down to airport saftey
On the Historychannel's, "That's Incredible", woody Norris admitted to making a remotelie detector prototype for the government.
This might bewhy when
our surveillance attacks go overt they are threatening andintimidating.
Responses to this type of overt V2K would show up bythese three
physical responses.
Millimeter wave surveillance
must be pretty accurate to read such minute movement on the surfaceof
the body. I know lasers pointed at a window can feel theslightest
vibrations and decipher sound and speech
from outsidethe room like a hearing
devise. So if we respond that is anotherform of feed
back.
Another form would be subvocal nonverbalspeech
recognition. Electrodes under the lower jaw can do this
withwires.
http://tinyurl.com/ycwbue3
I
broadcasting implant in that location orin a nerve bundle to that area
could be a way to broad cast ourunspoken thoughts. I've asked myself if
millemeter wave has theaccuracy to read these nerve impulses that are
supposed to causeminute muscle movement.
The last way would be
to read our EEGremotly or (RNM) remote neural monitoring
that David Larson attempted to prove with.
http://tinyurl.
com/26r26a3
Criminaland Scientific Misconduct Involving
Neural Prosthesis Research Funded by the
NIH/NINDS/NPPand The Alfred
E. Mann Foundation
David A. Larson
lars1212@verizon.net
.........and lastly others at one time were
hearing my V"K whether it was on accident or
on purpose I don'tknow.
Peter Rosenholm
>
Comments