You need to be a member of Peacepink3 to add comments!

Join Peacepink3

Comments

  • When it comes to the reality that almost all we know about modern medicine has been through trial and error, how are we to handle medical needs of modern life? Would some propose to throw away all knowledge based upon the fact that it was gained by unethical means, and then start over without using unethical means? If significant gains in the human experience can come from proper use of advancing technology, should we or should we not use it where advancement can be made? Or, should we throw it all out and start over without being unethical? If you were to start over, and somewhere along the way someone who is unethical came into power, you might end up having even more undesirable effects come into play. The whole idea of using real humans might again become a reality. As we stand we are at a place where we can continue to advance without using real humans to experiment on.

    And I have to as again, Why would you judge Trans-humanists as though they would be excited that other were harmed in the process of humans being hurt in order to advance technology? Are you sure you are not biased by the fear of something you personally find strange? I know some call Trans-humanists an abomination because God says we are made in his image, so we should not change anything. They use the scriptures as their excuse to find something new and different strange and 'evil', thus being from Satan.

    I would hope anyone would make judgements about an organization would see how that organization truply feels about something before you classify them as bad.

  • Its reall ygreat thatyou nare posting articles! I did notice that the writer of this article is a conspiracy theorist. She makes assurations that even fybormialgia is caused by whoever it is thaat runs this machine. She believes in just about evry conspiracy out there. For instance, she talks about Trnas-humanism as being bad and a part of her new world order.I have studies Trans-humanism and have found that they are not advocating any such idea. They believe that humans have devloped technology to point thwere we can better ourselves by thses advancements. hether it be physically or mentally, we will soon have the opportunity to take avntage of these advancements with the idea of immortaility. Trans-humanist want all people to have a choice to use technology to advance our individual life experience, or to live a more traditional life and a traditional death. The way things are going now, we are not being given an choice. our brains are being taken over by them by the misuse of the technologicaladvancements.

    SO, in some ways, you and Trans-humanists are on the same side. We both want the freedom of choice in how, or if at all, this tech will be applied in our individual lives. I say individual so the choice one makes will not encroach upon the rights of another.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transhumanism

This reply was deleted.