I have been brainstorming on 22 years of court failures on subject of Remote Neural Monitoring. There are two parts of analysis....1. ACT phenomena i.e. advanced covert technology phenomena...this is first time happening in human history so might have been difficult to analyze and comprehend. Under this phenomena if a covert group - state or private succeed in developing technology which is say half a century ahead of open society technology...harrassment or illegal activities based on this will go unpunished and the complainer has to suffer.It has to be argued in court that we are objeserving phenomena for first time and we expect govt and justice department to fail in ensureing justice due to this phenomena. But it is responsibility of those administrating land to ensure that justice prevail in all situations..towards this Govt has to still take the libility arises out of this. Court should also be asked that under these situation how it will ensure justice or justice will be denied till open group comprehands this which may be as much as half a century ahead and the entire life of complaniner will be waste.2. We should start focussing on building laws which choke covert group of of open society supplies...the first of it is satellite and satellite lauch vehicle and licence to operate. (Later more difficult ones like IT hardware and Software hardware, skilled manpower, electricity can come into play..these become difficult to implement).We should ask the courts to force govts to enact laws...even though it considers them prevantive...such that getting declaration for satellite operating and satellite lauching companies that space bound object does not contain brain interfacing technologies. We have to do a little projection into technology...a technology which can do difficult and complicated aspect like brain reading and voice to skull..can much easiely inteface with heart and respiratory system cortex and create malfunction and death. And it is very easily scalable with much less financial requirement that nuclear bomb to bring it into category of weapon of mass destruction.Court has to understand these complications arising out in technology based civilisations and understand this is first time we are facing it and act in proactive manner to prevent it.
Comments