In a short briefing, I will try to pinpoint my mistakes and their power.
In order to make it easier for you to understand what is going on, what
was going on and what will happen in the next years.
The group acted according to a plan.
The executioners sometimes new each other, some other times they did not.
Problem is that we thought that the group was static.
It had in fact ramifications all over the world - first mistake I made.
Second mistake : they were playing with Einstein and Tesla. And with no rules, neither writtenn nor in
their minds. I am going to give an example, simple, but crucial, of this fact:
"It is obvious that V2K is used currently. One of the reasons why it is not recognized is the following
one. At the early stages of its discovery, different scientists - many of them from universities
worldwide known - expressed their reservations about its used. Those reservations were caused, among other
factors, because it was well known at that time that the waves that were used for V2K could produce
cancer in the human beings if used at certain intensities and probably even if used at low intensities but
continuously. Not recognizing or regulating the use of such devices avoids being liable. Question:
Is there any protocol signed among nations in which V2K is mentioned?
Third mistake :
They had infiltrated different layers of the population in different ways.
These layers of the population were not loyal to themselves sometimes and did not know each other either.
Only the upper echelons know each other enough. That is one of the reasons why the whole thing
is called "a game". Even though sometimes some of the groups that mention this word try to look smart and
think of it "in the context that they are allowed". So while they are playing on game on certain human beings
other people are considering them as simple "pawns". It is not "pawns" what worries the upper
echelons, it is when those who are considered like such start thinking "out of the box".
That is not allowed.
Curiously, everything is related with technical level of those who participate in "the game".
It is obvious that in order to understand that you are in danger you have to have elements in your mind to
perceive the nature of the danger. For example, you know that if you get near a furnace you can get burned because
you know how it works and how heat is generated. It is more difficult to perceive that if you live near a place
where high voltage cables exist, your probability to get cancer increases - this is not so well known by the general
public, they have to know about electromagnetism to understand what is happening and, besides, they have to think
about it thoroughly, since it is phenomenon that does not damage immediately the human tissues.
But at least they see a source that is capable of creating some damage. At least that is a lead.
Now lets see a third case, which is the one that really is related to the non-lethal weapons that
could damage us. Nobody is able to see who is handling them, their shape or the intensity that is used. Does it
give you a sensation of the danger that they represent. Let's take for example the tasers, visible, studied and regulated.
We all know that, depending on the intensity of the tasers, they can be lethal or not. Yes, there are lethal tasers nowadays.
So, why don't we take into account all these facts and get a measure of the danger that surrounds us.
Now think of a weapon of this nature installed in a satellite - without regulations. And draw health related conclusions.
Comments