THE RESPONSES WE HAVE RECEIVED FROM AUTHORITIES since 2004 - part 2

[JOHN FINCH]

17. MR NIGEL FARRAGE, MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, from UKIP ( United Kingdom Independence and Democracy Party), BRUSSELS, EUROPE 28/7/08

Subject: UKIP-response to FAMCE-delegation
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:27:12 +0200
From: [e-mail]
To: [e-mail], [e-mail]

Dear Monika and Rudy

Three weeks ago, as you know, a FAMCE-delegation, consisting of Swetlana Schunin and Walter Madliger, was received at the UKIP-offices in the LOW-building of the EU's consultative assembly, at Strasbourg, and submitted certain documents, with a view to promoting awareness of the need to monitor and control a range of electronic weapons, which, according to numerous reports, have been under development for several decades and have been used, covertly, in various parts of the world, to the discomfort and distress of many people.

Most notable, among the documents submitted - because it comes, as it were, from the horse's mouth - is the programme of the "4th European Symposium on Non-Lethal Weapons 2007", held by the "European Working Group on Non-Lethal Weapons" (EWG-NLW) http://www.non-lethal-weapons.com/leaflet.pdf at the Stadthalle, in Ettlingen, Germany.

This programme, containing as it does, such items as "Software and Hardware of Instrumentation for Human-State Control in the Influence-Field of Microwave Radiation", "Psychological Effects of Non-Lethal Weapons: a new Approach for Defining more Effective Uses" and "Bio-Impulse:  a Research Program to Study the Effects of Nanosecond Electromagnetic Pulses on Biological Cells", bears out the studies and anecdotal evidence, submitted by the delegation, to the extent that research into electronic weapons, for the purposes of effecting pain, injury and mind-manipulation, is certainly going on.

Furthermore, judging by the sources of the presentations made at the symposium, most of this research is proceeding in the EU, the USA and Russia.  Note too that, at this same symposium (on 23rd May, item V27) the International Committee of the Red Cross sponsored a presentation on the subject of "Ensuring the protection of Civilians and Respect for International Humanitarian Law".

The delegation did not mention that the EWG-NLW is now preparing for its "5th European Symposium on Non-Lethal Weapons 2009" - also to be held at the Stadthalle in Ettlingen - and is appealing for prospective presenters, either of discussions (25 mins) or of posters, to send in their abstracts before the 1st October.
http://www.ict.fraunhofer.de/fhg/Images/Callforpapers5EuropeanSymposiumNon-LethalWeapons_tcm137-124391.pdf

If FAMCE has not done so, I would recommend that it submit an abstract for this symposium - as the Red Cross successfully did, last year - in order to promote awareness of the themes of its campaign among those who know most about the technology, which FAMCE alleges is being mis-used.  EWG-NLG's response to such an application might be informative; and, even if the application is unsuccessful, FAMCE should attempt, at least, to attend the symposium in order to gather intelligence. 

EWG-NLW's website (URL given above) states that "The working Group is open to all European organizations working in the area of Non-Lethal Weapons", so, unless the membership-fee is prohibitively high, I do not see why FAMCE should not join the working-group as a full member, get closer to the sources (which remain tantalisingly vague) of the problems it identifies, and develop a voice within a forum, which will be able to appreciate, better than any other, the significance of what it is saying.

As for the wider political context, in which electronic weapons are being developed, I would have thought it quite clear that the real danger to democracy, the rule of law and the rights of the individual, comes, not from the weapons themselves (knives and clubs can be used just as secretly and unattributably as electronic weapons) but from the erosion of democracy by supranational organisations, such as the EU, and clandestine, politico-commercial influences, such as the Council on Foreign Relations and the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House)

I agree completely with the opening chapters of Jim Keith's "Mass Control: Engineering Human Consciousness", which the delegation gave me, and which describes the grip exerted on US-policy by surreptitious societies, large corporations and secret agencies, and the sinister data-gathering programmes of the (not yet quite sovereign) EU.  The restoration of democracy, under these circumstances, is the only possible answer to misconduct by these various, sinister entities.  Even passing laws, like the ones now "in force", against the mis-use of electronic weapons, in some US-states, is completely ineffective as long as governments and courts remain under the undue influence of special interests, whether commercial or supranational.

Persuasive too is Heiner Gehring's book "Versklavte Gehirne", which the delegation also gave me, and which charts the control and misuse of the mass-media by the governments and other entities described above, showing that the restoration of democracy - through the decision of informed electorates - can only be achieved if the dis-information, propagated by an oligarchy of media-chains, can somehow be countered.

This is the essential business of the UK Independence Party (UKIP) and its supporters, among whom, therefore, I should like to count the FAMCE.

Even so, it may be possible to influence the situation for the better, by exposing the abuse of electronic weapons, if attacks of this kind can be clearly documented and liability can be clearly established.  The confused anecdotes of people, who claim to have been rendered mentally ill by such attacks, are, by their very nature, ambiguous and unreliable, and must be supported by some kind of concrete evidence.  When such evidence does emerge, UKIP's representatives in the Houses of Parliament in London (rather than those in the EU's sham counterpart in Brussels) will be well-placed to present it, and I shall certainly assist them in doing so.

Meanwhile, if you have specific questions, which our Westminster-representatives can usefully put to government-ministers, I would be pleased to relay these to them; but action in the EU's institutions is virtually impossible.  Written questions to the EU-Commission receive bland replies after several weeks.  An independent Political Group, such as ours, is effectively prevented from tabling items for the plenary agenda, and "MEP's", who are not supporters of the régime, are treated, in general, with contempt and are ignored.  All of this helps to demonstrate the EU's inherently anti-democratic structure, which should not be appealed to, under any circumstances, because doing so would imply recognition of a legitimacy it does not possess.

For us, the EU-assembly provides a platform for publicity in Britain, and nothing more.  It does not influence the EU's essential powers (as the fate of the Resolution of 1999, against the mis-use of electronic weapons, demonstrates) but, on all matters of moment, merely echoes the EU-Commission.  As a platform, however - and lacking any other, as we did until three years ago, when we first obtained representation at Westminster - it has been invaluable to us, and will probably continue to be so, for some time.

Now that we have made contact, and begun to work together, therefore, I look forward to maintaining a fruitful association with FAMCE.

Yours sincerely
Andrew S. Reed
Office of Nigel Farage, Brussels MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (UKIP)


18. THE INDEPENDENT COMMISSIONER PETER J O'CALLAGHAN ARCHDIOCESE OF MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA 1/8/08

From: Marilyn Stefanile <[e-mail]>
Date: Aug 1, 2008 10:20 AM
Subject: Email from Peter O'Callaghan
To: [e-mail]

Dear Mr Finch

I have received your email expressing your complaints in relation to the matters referred to.

I confirm that I am the Independent Commissioner appointed by the Archdiocese of Melbourne to enquire into allegations of sexual abuse by priests, religious and lay persons within the Archdiocese of Melbourne.

I note your serious concerns, but they do not fall within my jurisdiction.  I sympathise with your concerns, but am unable to assist you.

Yours sincerely
Peter J O'Callaghan - Independent Commissioner
Telephone:  [phone]


19. NEW YORK STATEHOUSE HEARINGS REGARDING OUR ISSUES SLATED FOR FEBRUARY - 22/8/08

On Thursday, Tim in New York met with State Senator Eric Adams, a boyhood friend of his who is has recently met with some TI's regarding our issues.  I wrote about him in the newsletter a couple of weeks ago.  He has been reviewing informational material from us for the past 2-3 weeks. 
 
In the meeting, Rep. Adams stated that he wants to hold hearings concerning OS/EH harassment in February.  He's asking that we send a brief summary of our harassment for his review to: [e-mail]  The hearing is open to the public.  Therefore, anyone anywhere in New York state, the country or the globe can give their testimony or attend. For clarity and time considerations he is reviewing the summaries submitted for testimony.  The location for the hearing will be New York City.  The exact address has not been determined.  We'll of course have a group of expert witnesses to address the senators about the technology and the psychology of the abuses as well.  We've provided him a suggested list of experts who have expressed their willingness to testify.  Those people he plans to contact and interview personally. 
 
He also mentioned that he wants media involvement, which he could generate.  And that this hearing would be the start of spinoff hearings in other states and would ultimately result in a congressional hearing.  
 
It would certainly be beneficial if there were some other state representatives that could work with him on this hearing.  Hopefully, we will find others who will come forward to lend their support to these issues.

One last comment: Scheduling of the hearing is the first step.  Completing the hearing is the goal.  And 5 1/2 months to go gives the stalkers plenty of time for mischief.  Those that were around last year will remember the television show that we were all counting on, only to have it cancelled just days before taping.  And the Firecracker Films documentary that never materialized.  And numerous television and newspaper reporters that contacted us and never heard from again.  So we've got to remember that something of this magnitude may encounter perp interference.  What I'm suggesting is that for all who are believers that we need to remain in prayer for this event - for Senator Adams and for the success of the hearing.  Also keep in mind that the month of February in New York could bring issues with the weather, which the perps have been known to bring on at just the exact time.  So please keep all these things in mind as we pray, and pray believing.  Personally, my belief is that we can only succeed in this struggle with God's help.  A word to the wise is sufficient.

All this will be discussed at the conference call this Saturday night.   And if there's time, Dale Wahl will join us to talk about his project.
 
For further questions or comments about the state hearing, please contact Tim in New York at:  [e-mail]


20. SUMMARY REPORT OF MY MEETING WITH THE LAWYERS IN PARIS
September 13, 2008 by Rudy Andria   [e-mail]

Only 3 lawyers turned up, the other 3 were held up at their offices at the last moment and briefly chatted with us on the phone.

1.They all know about the existence of various technological means which violate the fundamental human rights of innocent people , they know the existence of non lethal weapons and of highly sophisticated psychological pressures.

2.They do not have the slightest doubt about some governments' participation in influencing or even destroying the free will of some people.

3.They know that the exposure of such practices usually provokes sniggering and those who dare to complain are either made fun of or accused of paranoia.
Paranoia , of course, does exist and as it is characterized by an excessive mistrust of other people's acts or an excessive mistrust of power, it affects every social relationship and makes it possible to justify exclusion .

4.Utmost rigour and precision are therefore required when exposing the attacks on the victims' integrity, privacy and freedom of thought by invisible means. .
It is only by building up impeccable fact-files supported by official reports and scientific studies that public opinion worldwide can be sensitized and made aware of the problem.
It is only under these conditions of rigour and precision that the 3 lawyers present will agree to put the case for the defence.

The 3 lawyers all agreed on the following points:
Our difficulty is that we have practically no legal evidence of the attacks, so we have to make do with:
a) statistics
b) similarities in symptoms and experiences
c) similarities of torture cases
d) existence of weapons'patents
e) existence of the technology patents for the use of V2K
f) complicity of a number of psychiatrists worldwide
G) the highly probable involvement of many governments ( two lawyers referred to the example of helicopters and said that not many people can afford to maintain aircrafts. Flights are logged and the airspace they are in is recorded).

Rudy Andria
September 13, 2008

I've forgotten to add 1 point: the 3 lawyers think that our first help should come from the parliamentarians, because they are the ones who make the laws.


21. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT – The Office of the Prosecutor

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT – The Office of the Prosecutor
Our Reference: OTP-CR-70/07
The Hague, Monday, 29 September 2008

Dear Sir/Madam

On behalf of the Prosecutor, I thank you for your communication received 21/2/2007, as well as any subsequent related information.

As you may know, the International Criminal Court (“the ICC” or “the Court”) is governed by the Rome Statute, which entrusts the court with a very specific and carefully defined jurisdiction and mandate. A fundamental feature of the Rome Statute is that the Court may only exercise jurisdiction over persons for the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole, namely genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, as defined in the Rome Statute (Articles 6 to 8). The Court may only exercise jurisdiction over crimes committed on or after 1 July 2002 (Article 11). In addition, the Court may only exercise jurisdiction over crimes committed on the territory of a State that has accepted the jurisdiction of the Court or by a national of such a State (Article 12), or where the Security Council refers the situation to the Court 9Article 13).

Accordingly, I regret to advise you that your communication appears to relate to matters outside the jurisdiction of the Court. The Prosecutor has therefore confirmed that there is not a basis at this time to proceed with further analysis. The information you have submitted will be maintained in our archives, and the decision not to proceed may be reconsidered if new facts or evidence provide a reasonable basis to believe that a crime the jurisdiction of the Court has been committed.

I hope you will appreciate that with the defined jurisdiction of the Court, many serious allegations will be beyond the reach of this institution to address, I note in this regard that the ICC is designed to complement, not replace national jurisdictions. Thus, if you wish to pursue this matter further, you may consider raising it with other appropriate national or international authorities.

I am grateful for your interest in the ICC. If you would like to learn more about the work of the ICC, I invite you to visit our website at www.icc-cpi.int .

John Finch
5/8 Kemp Street, Thornbury, Vic, 3071, Australia

Yours sincerely
{signature}

M.P. Dillon
Head of the Information & Evidence Unit
Office of the Prosecutor

Post Office Box 19519, 2500 CM The Hague, The Netherlands
TEL: [phone]  FAX: [phone]  http://www.icc-cpi.int


22. 2^nd LETTER FROM REPRESENTATIVE JIM GUEST - 8/10/08
http://www.msnusers.com/JAMESWALBERTFILE/shoebox.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=10

JIM GUEST STATE REPRESENTATIVE MISSOURI
DISTRICT ADDRESS 
P.O. BOX 412, KING CITY, MO  64463 
Tel: [phone] 

To Whom It May Concern: 

I have worked for 3 years with Microwave and Electronic Harassment victims throughout the US and overseas.  It is hard for others to understand the technology that is being used to destroy people’s lives. I know James because he contacted me for help. James has worked to find proof of what has happened to him.

Many victims try hard to get help from professional doctors to help find devices such as Veri-Chip. I would request that you and those who can make a difference would help James and others to find answers. 
 
5^th District State Representative


23.^.THE TAOISEACH OF IRELAND - 8/10/08

Dear Mr. Finch,

I wish to acknowledge receipt of your e-mail of 3 October 2008 which will be brought to the Taoiseach's attention as soon as possible.

Yours sincerely,

David King
Assistant Private Secretary to the Taoiseach

Telephone:  [phone]
E-mail:        [e-mail] , [e-mail] , [e-mail]

The Department of the Taoiseach is committed to providing a professional, efficient and courteous service to all our customers. To view the Customer Charter, please click on
http://www.taoiseach.gov.ie/index.asp?1ocID=181&docID=1762


23. MR NIGEL FARRAGE, MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, from UKIP ( United Kingdom Independence and Democracy Party), BRUSSELS, EUROPE 30/1/09

Dear Mr Finch

Thank you for this account of your hideous experiences and the technology, which might have been used to occasion them.

The UK Independence Party is supporting the initiative, by Dr Walter Madlinger, to demonstrate such matters to an expert audience, at the Ettlingen Conference on Non-Lethal Weapons, on 11th May, this year, and I would encourage you to attend, if you are not already planning to do so.

Yours sincerely
Andrew S. Reed
(Office of Nigel Farage, Brussels)
EMAIL: [e-mail]


24. MR ANTHONY ROMERO, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ACLU, 13/2/09

Dear John,

Thank you for speaking out against the abuse of the "state secrets" doctrine. We know your time is limited, and we appreciate your efforts to protect civil liberties.

The ACLU works daily in courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and laws of the United States guarantee everyone in this country. We need your support now more than ever as we work to restore liberties lost over the last eight years. If you have a moment, please make a donation today. Visit www.aclu.org/donate.

Thanks again for taking action. We'll keep you up-to-date on this important legislation.

Sincerely,
Anthony D. Romero
Executive Director, ACLU
[e-mail]


25. MR NIKIFOROUS DIAMANDOUROS, THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN, 28/5/09

S2009-104176
STRASBOURG 8/5/09
COMPLAINT NUMBER: 1568/2006/(AVM)OV

Dear Sir (Mr John Finch)

I am writing in reply of your email of 9 April 2009 in which you come back on your earlier complaint 1568/2006/(AVM)OV.

You allege that some extreme and horrendous criminality is being conducted by agencies related to the US government with the complicity of many other government and security agencies. You state that victims as you are being subjected to torture and mental and physical destruction and that this has remained completely unreported. You state that, more particularly, you are being completely mutilated and neutralised by electro-magnetic radiation and that you are “brain-broadcasted”.

As I already informed you in my letters of 22 June and 14 September 2006, I have unfortunately no power to intervene in this matter, because your allegations are not directed against a European Union institution or body.

However given that you are residing in Australia, I would like to repeat my earlier advice that, in case you have an allegation against an Australian government agency, you might consider contacting the Australian Ombudsman:

Commonwealth Ombudsman
National Office
GPO Box 442, Canberra ACT 2601
Ground Floor, I Farrell Place
Canberra City ACT 2600
http://www.comb.gov.au
[e-mail]

I regret I cannot be of further assistance.

Yours sincerely,

P. Nikiforos DIAMANDOROUS
The European Ombudsman
1 Ave President Robert Schumann – CS 30403 – F-67001 strasbourg Cedex
TEL: [phone] – fax: [phone]
http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu – [e-mail]


26. THE PREMIER OF NSW, AUSTRALIA, 6/8/09

EA1470971 – HSJB

Dear Mr Finch

The Premier has received your recent email concerning your reported experiences in Russia, Turkey and China.

As the subject you have raised primarily relates to areas of Australian Government responsibility, Mr Rees is unable to be of direct assistance.

Accordingly, the opportunity has been taken to bring the terms of your approach to the attention of the Australian Government.

Yours sincerely
Emanuel Sklavounos
for Director General


27. PROF. DR. ADRIAN EUGEN HOLLAENDER, CENTER OF LEGAL RESEARCH, UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA, 11/8/09

CENTER OF LEGAL RESEARCH,
Prof. Dr. Adrian  Eugen  Hollaender,
Chairman of The Austrian Fundamental Rights Conference,
Human Rights Seminar Instructor at the University of Vienna

Dear Mr. Finch:

With great concern, I have read your complaint about ENERGY AND NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONS TORTURE, DEGRADATION AND MUTILATION CASE.

If you wish, I could examine the case under the legal perspective and write a legal expertise on it that you can use in the complaint procedures.

Sincerely,
Prof. Hollaender
Email: [e-mail]


28. MR NIKIFOROUS DIAMANDOUROS, THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN, 11/9/09

S2009-104176
STRASBOURG 8/5/09
COMPLAINT NUMBER: 1568/2006/(AVM)OV

Dear Sir (Mr John Finch)

I am writing in reply to your emails of 10, 11, 17 and 18 August 2009 in which you come back on your earlier complaint 1568/2006/(AVM)OV concerning your “directed energy and neurological weapons torture, degradation and mutilation case” you also sent me a “list of the crimes committed by the NWO criminals”.

As I already informed you in my letters 22 June and 14 September 2006, and 8 May 2009, I unfortunately have no power to intervene in this matter.

I regret that I cannot be of further assistance to you in this case

Yours sincerely,

P. Nikiforos DIAMANDOROUS
The European Ombudsman
1 Ave President Robert Schumann – CS 30403 – F-67001 strasbourg Cedex
TEL: [phone] – fax: [phone]
http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu – [e-mail]


29. MR MARTIN FERGUSON, MEMBER OF AUSTRALIAN PARLIAMENT, 7/1/10

REF: MF/MK (2010/01/07)

Dear Mr Finch

Further to our recent meeting, I have written to the Attorney General, Robert McClelland requesting that your suspicion about constant monitoring of your life by ASIO and the Australian Federal Police be investigated.

You will be advised of any response I receive from the Attorney General.

Best wishes for 2010

Yours sincerely
MARTIN FERGUSON AM MP
Federal Member for Batman, Minister for Resource and Energy, Minister for Tourism
www.martinferguson.com.au


30. MR IAN CARNELL, INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY, OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY, AUSTRALIA, 24/3/10

Correspondence reference: 2010/505
File reference: 2009/62
24 March 2010

Mr John Finch, [e-mail]

Dear Mr Finch

Thank you for your email of 16 March 2010 asking for protection from surveillance, torture and abuse. I have read your email and note that you believe you are being tortured and abused by ‘directed energy and neuroligical weapons’ by United States government agencies with the complicity of other governments and security agencies.

Before responding to your specific concerns, it is appropriate that I inform you a little about the role and functions of my office.

The Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS) has general oversight responsibilities for each of the six Australian intelligence agencies. The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) is Australia’s domestic security agency and is therefore the Australian intelligence agency most likely to have interaction with Australian persons. The focus of ASIO’s work is on countering terrorism, discouraging people who may act violently for political reasons, and discouraging people who seek to clandestinely obtain sensitive government information or otherwise harm Australia’s interests in order to further their own causes or the interests of foreign governments.

Other ASIO functions include collecting foreign intelligence within Australia, and providing security assessments and protective security advice.

Based on my experience as IGIS for nearly six years, I can assure you that neither ASIO nor any agency within the Australian Intelligence Community (AIC) has the resources, motivation or legal authority to harm individuals in the way you describe.

I am confident in making this assertion because ASIO and the other AIC agencies are each subjected to intensive and frequent review by this office, to ensure that they conduct their business within the bounds of the law, and in a professional and ethical manner. I can also assure you that the inspection regime undertaken by my office is very thorough.

You have also raised the possibility that a foreign intelligence service might be involved in the activities you described. ASIO has a functional interest in monitoring any such activity, and in turn my office closely examines ASIO’s activities in this area. On the basis of the material available to me, I do not believe that they are negligent in this regard.

I should also tell you that I do not have any jurisdiction over any foreign intelligence services, but despite this would regard it as highly improbable that they would target any member of the Australian public who is simply going about their ordinary business.

While I don’t doubt that you have experienced a range of issues that are of concern to you, none of the AIC agencies have the capabilities or motivation to do what you describe.

If you believe you have been the subject of a crime, you have the option of discussing this with your local police.

While my office is unable to directly assist you, I nonetheless hope that the above information is both helpful and reassuring to you.

On behalf of
Ian Carnell, Inspector-General of   Intelligence and Security

Office of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security
P [phone] | F [phone] | www.igis.gov.au


31. EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN, PETER BONNOR HEAD OF REGISTRY, 13/3/12

[e-mail]
[e-mail]

Directorate A Registry
13/3/12
COMPLAINT O497/2012/MF

Dear Mr Finch

I am writing in reply to your email of 1^st March in which you complained about alleged acts of torture by electronic weapons and mutilations on certain people ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Having concluded that your complaint is outside the European Ombudsman’s mandate, I wish you every success in finding a positive outcome to the matter you raised in your complaint.

Yours Sincerely
Peter Bonnor
Head of Registry
European Ombudsman

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Euro-Ombudsman <[e-mail]> wrote:

Dear Mr     Murray,

I am writing in reply to your e-mail of 19 April 2012 in which you     asked for help in your matter concerning among others mind     control.

I would like to inform you that the     role of the European Ombudsman is to investigate complaints alleging     maladministration in the activities of the European institutions, bodies,     offices and agencies, such as the European Commission and the European     Parliament. No action by any other authority or person may be the subject of     a complaint to the Ombudsman. Only EU citizens or residents in the territory     of the Union may lodge a complaint with the European     Ombudsman (Art. 2 (2) of the Statute of the European     Ombudsman.

From the above also follows that the Ombudsman is     not in a position to help you in your matter, since it does not fall within     his mandate.

I hope this information suits you     well.

Best regards,

European           Ombudsman

Zuzana           Vaníčková

T. [phone]         28

[e-mail]

1 avenue du Président           Robert Schuman, CS           30403, F - 67001 Strasbourg           Cedex
T. + 33 (0)3 88 17 23         13
F. + 33 (0)3 88 17 90         62
www.ombudsman.europa.eu

From: joe murray   [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: 26 April 2012   03:27

To: Euro-Ombudsman

Subject: Re: Please help us to   get this electronic torture, abuse and experimentation   stopped

thanks - I'm an EU (UK) citizen and I'm complaining   about maladministration in the EU Instititutions and Agencies that are   supposed to protect us from these tortures and abuses.

For example the   ECHR and EUROPOL.

sincerely

john finch


From: Euro-Ombudsman <[e-mail]>

Date: Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:39 PM

Subject: RE: Please help us to get this electronic torture, abuse and experimentation stopped

To: joe murray <[e-mail]>

Dear Mr Finch,

Thank you for your further e-mail. From the information provided, it is not clear what are exactly your allegation(s) and claim(s) and against which institutions you wish to complaint against.

I would like to reiterate in this regards that complaint concerning ECHR is outside the Ombudsman's remit. Please note, in this regard, that the European Court of Human Rights was established by the European Convention on Human Rights, signed by the Member States of the Council of Europe. The European Court of Human Rights was not created by or under the EU Treaties and, consequently, it is not a European Union institution, body, office or agency. The European Ombudsman is therefore not entitled to deal with complaints against the European Court of Human Rights.

Should you nevertheless wish to complain to the Ombudsman, you are free to do so. However, please note that the complaint shall be made within two years of the date on which the facts on which it is based came to the attention of the person lodging the complaint and must be preceded by the appropriate administrative approaches to the institutions and bodies concerned (Art. 2 (4) of the Statute of the European Ombudsman). Moreover, the facts of the complaint must not be, or have been, subject to judicial proceedings (Art. 1 (3) of the Statute of the European Ombudsman).

If these criteria are fulfilled and you wish to complain against an EU institution, you could consider using the form for complaints, available on the Ombudsman's website:

 http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/atyourservice/home.faces

 I hope you will find this information useful.

European       Ombudsman

Zuzana       Vaníčková

T.       [phone]

[e-mail]

1       avenue du Président Robert Schuman, CS       30403, F       - 67001 Strasbourg Cedex
T.       + 33 (0)3 88 17 23 13

F.       + 33 (0)3 88 17 90 62
www.ombudsman.europa.eu


32. The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), KRISTINA BORROR, DIRECTOR, 25/4/12

[e-mail]
Borror, Kristina C (HHS/OASH)
25 April 2012 03:50

Dear Mr. Child

The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) has received your June 28, 2011, January 15, and April 18, 2012 emails regarding electronic torture, abuse and experimentation.

OHRP has responsibility for oversight of compliance with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) regulations for the protection of human research subjects (see 45 CFR Part 46 at http://www.dhhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm).  In carrying out this responsibility, OHRP evaluates, at OHRP’s discretion, substantive allegations of noncompliance involving human subject research projects conducted or supported by HHS or that are otherwise subject to the regulations (see OHRP memorandum dated October 14, 2009 at http://www.dhhs.gov/ohrp/compliance/ohrpcomp.pdf for an explanation of OHRP’s jurisdiction).

OHRP has jurisdiction only if the allegations involve human subject research (a) conducted or supported by HHS, or (b) conducted at an institution holding an applicable Assurance of Compliance with the HHS regulations.

Neither of these conditions appear to be met by the circumstances described in your letter.  Therefore, OHRP will not be able to pursue the matter on your behalf.

OHRP appreciates your concern about the protection of human research subjects.

Sincerely,
Kristina C. Borror, Ph.D.
Director, Division of Compliance Oversight


33. AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL, 5/7/12

On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 9:21 PM, <[e-mail]> wrote:

Dear John,

Many thanks for your email.

We regret to inform you that Amnesty International is unable to offer you any assistance as your case does not fall within our areas of work.

We do understand your concerns and desire that action be taken. However, our work is determined by the framework established by Amnesty International members at a global level, and all individual cases that we work on must fall within the terms established by our statute. This does not mean that we consider certain types of human rights, or human rights abuses, to be more important than others. Nor does it mean that we have reached any conclusion as to whether you may have been the victim of a human rights violation. Rather, it means that we must, to be as effective as possible, channel our limited resources towards those areas of work which we have identified as priorities.

We regret that we are unable to assist you, and we do understand the disappointment this must cause. However, we hope you are able to understand the reasons behind this. We do hope that you are able to find the help that you need elsewhere, and that your situation improves.

If you wish to check which kinds of cases Amnesty International can deal with, please check our web page locatedat:

http://www.amnesty.org/en/who-we-are

Sorry we are not able to be of further assistance in this matter.

Regards,

The Communications Team.

From: [e-mail]

To: [e-mail]

Date: 05/07/2012 04:58

Subject: [Website: contact us] electronic torture,abuse and experimentation

Sent by: [e-mail],


34. EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, COMMITTEE ON PETITIONS, 24/8/12

Erminia Mazzoni
Chairman, Committee on Petitions
European Parliament
B-1047 Brussels
tel: [phone]
fax: [phone]

PETITION NUMBER: 0392/2012

I acknowledge the receipt of your recent correspondence dated 14/6/12 to the Committee on Petitions.

This will be added to the file of Mr Babacek on alleged use of mind control systems in the EU

(they then included this copy of the letter sent to Mr Mojmir Babacek on 19/7/12)

Dear Mr Babacek

Thank you for having submitted your petition to the European Parliament for its consideration. It was examined in order to assess whether the issue which you raise, falls clearly within the fields of activity of the European Union for which we are competent.

Unfortunately, I have to inform you that this was not the case, and I am therefore obliged to file your request without being able to take matters any further, pursuant to Article 201 (8) of our Rules of Procedure.

yours sincerely

Erminia Mazzoni
Chairman
Committee on Petitions


35. THE BILL OF RIGHTS DEFENSE COMMITTEE, 18/9/12

from: Bill of Rights Defense Committee [e-mail], [e-mail],
to: john finch [e-mail]
date: Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7.23am
Re: TO THE BILL OF RIGHTS DEFENSE COMMITTEE – We are a group of over 1300 electronic torture, abuse and experimentation victims – please assist us

Dear John,

Thank you for taking the time to write.

The Bill of Rights Defense Committee advocates and organizes grassroots support for constitutional rights based on the facts reported by national media. We simply don't have the resources to do investigative journalism.

Therefore, BORDC has no institutional position on whether mind control is happening. We take the facts as they're reported, and build a grassroots response.

Wishing all of you the very best,

Barbara
---
Barbara Haugen, Administrator
Bill of Rights Defense Committee
8 Bridge Street, Suite A
Northampton, MA 01060
413-582-0110
www.bordc.org


36. INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF RED CROSS AND RED CRESCENT SOCIETIES, 26/9/12

from: International Federation Secretariat [e-mail]
to: john finch <[e-mail]
date: Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:34 PM
subject: RE: TO THE RED CROSS AND RED CRESCENT - MY ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE, TORTURE, ABUSE AND EXPERIMENTATION CASE SUMMARY
mailed by: ifrc.org

Sir/Madam,

Your email has reached the International Federation based in Geneva, Switzerland.

Your message has been received and read with concern. Although we would like to help, we regret to inform you that the Secretariat of the International Federation is not in a position to assist you on this matter.

For your information, the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies is a federation of National Societies which works to improve the lives of vulnerable people by mobilizing the power of humanity. For doing this, it operates through and in agreement with National Societies and does not respond to individuals for personal assistance.

We suggest, therefore, that you contact the National Society based in your country and submit your request for support directly to them. Contact addresses can be found on our web site in the "directory" section. http://www.ifrc.org/address/directory.asp

We hope that you can find the support you need and wish you all the best.

Regards,
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies


37. ACLU - THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, OREGON, 29/9/12

ACLU – American Civil Liberties Union
PO Box 40585, Portland, Oregon, 97240
[phone]                        www. aclu-or.org

September 28, 2012

John Finch
[e-mail]

Dear Mr Finch

Thank you for contacting the American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon. As you may know, the ACLU of Oregon is a small, private, non-profit organization funded entirely by private donations. Typically, the cases we accept are handled by lawyers in private practice who donate their time. As a result, we offer legal assistance in only a small number of cases each year.

Consequently, we must choose cases that most clearly invoke significant civil rights and civil liberties issues. We focus on protecting the rights of individuals to be free from excessive government intrusion and the right to receive equal protection under the law. These liberties include the rights of freedom of speech, press and religion, the right to be treated equally and without discrimination on the basis of race and sex, and the right to be free of abusive police conduct. Among these cases, we are forced to limit our representation to “impact cases” i.e., those that present new legal issues or affect large numbers of people.

We cannot assist in cases that depend on establishing facts. We are generally unable to get involved in disputes between private parties, with private employers, or private organizations. We also cannot intervene in a situation where an attorney has already been retained unless the attorney personally requests assistance, and even then, all the other criteria are still in place.

Based on the above criteria, we have concluded the ACLU is unable to provide you assistance. Please be assured, however, that this does not reflect on the worthiness of your case.

I have enclosed the ACLU of Oregon’s Referral and Information sheet. One of the organizations listed may be able to assist you. I regret we are unable to help you further.

Sincerely
(signature)
Kevin Diaz
Legal Director

Enclosure: ACLU OF Oregon Referrals and Information


38. THE PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION FOR THE STUDY OF BIOETHICAL ISSUES - PCSBI, 27/7/11

1425 New York Avenue, NW, Suite C-100, Washington, DC 20005
PHONE [phone]                        FAX [phone]     WWW.BIOETHICS.GOV

July 27, 2011

Dear Commenter:

We are writing to advise you on our ongoing work and plans for the next meeting of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. We appreciate the time that you have taken to engage with us.

We would like to clarify for your information that the Commission is not investigating or reviewing any concerns or complaints concerning claims about targeted individuals. This includes claims concerning: MK-ULTRA; COINTELPRO; electromagnetic torture or attacks; organized stalking; remove influencing; microwave harassment; covert harassment and surveillance; human tracking; psychotronic or psychotropic weapons and radio frequency or military weapons or other claims.

As such the Commission will not hear further testimony on these subjects. Many of these issues have been investigated in the past. The Commission is not a law enforcement, regulatory or legislative body. It does not control any federal monies. In addition, the Commission has no involvement with the public or private grants and has no power to open or undertake criminal cases.

As advisors to the President, we will ensure that all of your concerns, information and testimony are provided to the White House. We sincerely appreciate your interest in the work of the Commission and the time you have taken to share your personal history with us.

Sincerely
signature

Valerie H. Bonham
Executive Director


39. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT – ICC- , THE OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR, 27/11/12

Our Reference: OTP-CR-70/07/002

The Hague, Tuesday 27 November 2012

John Finch
[e-mail]


Dear Sir/Madam

On behalf of the Prosecutor, I acknowledge receipt of your communication received on 1/10/2012.

According to our records, you have sent three or more communications to the Office of the Prosecutor dealing with matters which are substantially the same as those already examined by it.

As noted in our previous responses, the matter described in your communication does not appear to fall within the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (“the Court”), and the Prosecutor has confirmed that there is not a basis to proceed with further analysis in the absence of new facts or evidence.

The Office has carefully examined your latest communication and has re-confirmed that it does not introduce new facts or evidence altering the conclusion that there is not a basis to proceed under the Statute.

I hope you will understand that the Court is governed by Rome Statute, which provides a very specific and carefully defined jurisdiction and mandate over the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole, under strict conditions specified under the Statute. As a result, many serious allegations will be beyond the reach of this institution to address.

Please understand that, given our carefully defined mandate and limited resources, where a person submits a succession of communications or seeks repeatedly to introduce the same matter, the Office is not able to continue further correspondence with that person on subsequent related communications.


Yours Sincerely


M.P. Dillon
Head of the Information & Evidence Unit
Office of the Prosecutor

PO Box 19519, 2500 CM The Hague, The Netherlands
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

www. icc-cpi.int