THE RESPONSES WE HAVE RECEIVED FROM AUTHORITIES since 2004 - part3

[JOHN FINCH]

40. OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS (OHCHR), 5/12/12

from:     Petitions OHCHR <[e-mail]>
to:        JUAN LACHESIS <[e-mail]>
date:     Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:12 PM
subject: Re: Fw: Dear Torture Victims and Friends - Attached are our updated over 1400 electronic torture, abuse and experimentation victims’ case summaries

Dear Sir,

Thank you for alerting us to your case. We have examined your email with attention and we nonetheless regret that the United Nations Secretariat is unable to assist you in the circumstances of your case.

Yours sincerely,

Petitions and Inquiries Section (Section des requêtes et des enquêtes)
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
Pallais des Nations
CH-1211 Genève 10
Switzerland
Fax: [phone]


41. OPEN SOCIETY JUSTICE INITIATIVE, OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATION, 20/2/13

from:   Heena Khaled [e-mail]
to:        [e-mail]" [e-mail]
date:     Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:19 AM
subject:            Enquiry Response-Psychotronic Weapons

Dear John,

Many thanks for your email, requesting help from the Open Society Justice Initiative .

We appreciate that you consider us a source for help and are always willing to provide assistance to victims within our reach whom we can provide expert assistance to. However, it is unfortunate that on this occasion the Open Society Justice Initiative cannot provide you the assistance you require, as we do not work in this field at the present moment.

We hope you find the support you require and sincere apologies,

Best Regards,

Heena Khaled | Administrative Associate |Open Society Justice Initiative

Open Society Foundation, 7^th Floor, Millbank Tower, 21-24 Millbank, London SW1P 4QP United Kingdom
[e-mail] Tel: [phone] Fax:[phone]
www.opensocietyfoundations.org/people/heena-khaled


42. OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS (OHCHR), 26/2/13


from: Petitions OHCHR [e-mail]
to:  MCmailteam International [e-mail]
date: 26 februari 2013 05:26
subject: Re: DEAR MS NAVANETHEM PILLAY and the OHCHR - 中国受害者告全世界人民书 An Announcement To The Whole World By Chinese Victims Of Directed Energy And Psychotronic Weapons

Dear Sir or Madam,

We acknowledge receipt of your message of 22 February 2013. May we suggest that you refer to our website for information about the procedures for the examination of individual petitions on human rights violations : www.ohchr.org, (direct link http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/FactSheet7Rev.1en.pdf). If you have difficulty accessing our website, please write to the OHCHR, Information Office PW-RS-011, 1211 Geneva 10, and ask for Human Rights Fact Sheets Nos. 7, 12, 15 and 17.

Please carefully examine the information referred to above and, if you think that your complaint falls within a mandate of one of the UN treaty-bodies, resubmit it to this treaty-body (Committee) with duly filled-in complaint form and copies of all supporting documents.

Sincerely,
A staff member of the Petitions and Inquiries Section
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
Pallais des Nations
CH-1211 Genève 10
Switzerland

Fax: [phone]


43. THE PRESIDENT OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (EP), MR MARTIN SCHULZ, 9/9/13


From: [e-mail]
To: [e-mail]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 6:20 PM

Dear Mr Baird,

The President of the European Parliament (EP), Mr Martin Schulz, has received your message concerning Parliamentary Resolution A4-0005/99 and the progress since its adoption.

The Citizens' Enquiry Service of the EP has been asked to reply.

On 6 March 2008, a written question was put to the Commission, asking what action has been taken by the EU since this call was made. If you wish to read the question in full, as well as the Commission's reply, please consult the following webpage.

Since you also refer to the recent NSA surveillance issues, please note that this was a subject of debate at the plenary session in the European Parliament on 3 July. If you wish to consult the debate in full, please click here.

In this regard, the EP adopted a resolutionon 4 July which was approved by 483 votes to 98 with 65 abstentions. According to the press releaseon 8 July, the resolution instructs the EP's Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs(LIBE) to conduct an "in-depth" enquiry into the US surveillance programmes, including the bugging of EU institutions and other spying allegations. The President of the EP, as well as political group leaders, formally confirmed the launch of the enquiry.

In the first hearing, held on 5 September, concerns were voiced by MEPs and key journalists on the impact of US National Security Agency and other surveillance programmes on EU citizens' privacy and media freedom and the lack of democratic oversight of these programmes. For further information, please consult this link.

Finally, to stay informed about the EP's current and future activities please consult our website.

We hope this is of interest and thank you for contacting the European Parliament.

Yours sincerely,
Citizens' Enquiry Service
European Parliament  
ref=10844


44. The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), KRISTINA BORROR, DIRECTOR, 6/11/13


Dear Mr. Finch:

The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) has received your November 03, 2013 concerning your experiences. 

OHRP has responsibility for oversight of compliance with the Health and Human Services (HHS) regulations for the protection of human research subjects (see 45 CFR Part 46 at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html).  In carrying out this responsibility, OHRP evaluates, at OHRP’s discretion, substantive allegations of noncompliance involving human subject research projects conducted or supported by HHS or that are otherwise subject to the regulations (see OHRP memorandum dated October 14, 2009 at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/compliance/ohrpcomp.pdf for an explanation of OHRP’s jurisdiction).

OHRP has determined that it does not have jurisdiction over the matters referenced in your letter.  Therefore, OHRP will not be able to pursue this matter on your behalf.

OHRP appreciates your concern about the protection of human research subjects.

Sincerely,
Kristina C. Borror, Ph.D.
Director
Division of Compliance Oversight
Borror, Kristina C (HHS/OASH) [e-mail]


45. The Justice Ministry of Denmark, 16/12/13


Ministry of Justice
Date: 16 December 2013
Office: Security and Prevention Division
Contact: Christian Lund Hansen
Our ref..: 2013-1914-0082
Doc.: 1007043


John Finch
[e-mail]


The Ministry of Justice has received your e-mail of 18 November 2013 regarding surveillance.
The ministry has read your e-mail but does not find reason to take further action in light of your enquiry.

Yours sincerely
Rasmus Krogh Pedersen

Slotsholmsgade 10, DK-1216 København K.
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.justitsministeriet.dk
[e-mail]


46. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT – ICC- , THE OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR, 9/4/14


From    OTP InformationDesk      [e-mail]

To   John Finch <[e-mail]>,
 mcmailteam <[e-mail]>


Dear Sir/Madam,

Thank you for your message. Please note that the International Criminal Court has a very limited jurisdiction. The Court may only address the crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes as defined by Articles 6 to 8 of the Rome Statute that have occurred after 2002, and can only exercise jurisdiction in the countries that have ratified it. For more information on the Court’s jurisdiction and the full text of the Rome Statute, please refer to page 2 of the attached document and our website, www.icc-cpi.int. We encourage you to carefully review this information.

If, after your careful review, you still believe the ICC is the correct place for your case and would like to submit a claim to the Court, then please follow the directions for how to do so on page 1 of the attached document. If you decide to submit information, kindly use only this email address : [e-mail].            

Kind regards,
OTP Information Desk
International Criminal Court


46. ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, 21/5/14


From Amul Kalia  [e-mail]

To [e-mail]

21/5/14

Re: [#VX-M9271] NON-CONSENSUAL EXPERIMENTATION WITH ELECTROMAGNETIC WEAPONS

Thank you for contacting the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF).

Unfortunately, the situation you describe is outside of EFF's area of focus. And we will not be able to represent you. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is a small, grassroots legal advocacy non-profit focused on defending civil liberties and constitutional rights online with very limited resources. EFF focuses on impact litigation at the federal level--usually questions or legal concepts never before seen by the courts. As such, we have a very important but narrowly focused mission and are not equipped to address all issues outside that limited scope. However, your local bar association should be able to refer you to an attorney for an initial consultation for a small fee.

I am sorry that we are unable to directly represent you and wish you the best of luck.

Regards,

Amul Kalia
Electronic Frontier Foundation
[phone]
[e-mail]

AND THAT'S ALL THE RESPONSES WE'VE HAD SINCE 2004!!

PLEASE CONTACT US FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:-
Yours in the search for openness and respect for universal human rights
John Finch, 5/8 Kemp St, Thornbury, Vic 3071, Australia, TEL: [phone]
EMAIL: [e-mail], [e-mail]
FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/john.finch.16547?ref=profile

TARGETED INDIVIDUAL and a member of THE WORLDWIDE CAMPAIGN AGAINST ELECTRONIC TORTURE, ABUSE AND EXPERIMENTATION