Greg Gamache, Plaintiff v. Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Federal Communications Commission
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
September 6, 2011
GREG GAMACHE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION,
DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Rosanna Malouf Peterson Chief United States District Court Judge
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT AND ENTERING JUDGMENT
Plaintiff, Greg Gamache, a pro se litigant proceeding in forma pauperis, filed a pro se letter that the Court liberally interprets as a complaint, ECF No. 1, on March 14, 2011, alleging that the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") and the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") are using "electronic weapons" against members of the public. Mr. Gamache names both agencies as Defendants. Defendants have not yet been served.
The Court must screen complaints brought by litigants proceeding in forma pauperis and shall dismiss the proceeding at any time if the action or appeal:
(i) is frivolous or malicious;
(ii) fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or
(iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.
28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B).
Mr. Gamache's letter asks for additional resources and relief to be made available to "victims of electronic weapons." ECF No. 1 at 1. However, Mr. Gamache does not identify which of his rights have been violated. Nor does he allege what, if any, cause of action lies against the FBI or the FCC.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The Plaintiff's complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim.
2. Judgment is to be entered WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
3. This file shall be CLOSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order and provide a copy to Mr. Gamache.
Rosanna Malouf Peterson
20110906
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.
Comments