http://www.genevaforum.ch/gf/index.php?id=24

https://www.youtube.com/watch?=hA2ye7R6JzE&feature=channel

UN again viewed “Non Lethal Weapons” against civilians.

 http://www.genevaforum.ch/gf/index.php?id=24

“Right now hundreds of thousands of people are suffering because of an unregulated arms trade. This year for the first time we have the opportunity to create a treaty that would ensure this deadly trade is properly controlled.”

“Millions of people are being killed, injured, raped, repressed and forced to flee their homes every year by perpetrators of serious human rights abuses and war crimes using a wide range of arms supplied by irresponsible traders and governments. Health, education and other services are being denied and destroyed.

The world needs a strong Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) with rules to protect human rights, so that if any type of arms to be exported to another country will probably contribute to serious human rights abuses or war crimes, then governments concerned must stop those supplies.”

http://www.amnesty.ca/iwriteforjustice/take_action.php?actionid=856&type=Internal

UNIDIR again viewed “Non Lethal Weapons” against civilians.

http://www.genevaforum.ch/gf/index.php?id=24

 UN Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law http://www.univie.ac.at/bimtor/rightofvictimsoftorturetoaremedyandreparation/497

Dear All,

Youtube URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3QpbrnCiAQ&feature=channel


First response to the Canadian Government's statement regarding our petition, which stated in its response to us: " The Government has no information on any such  activities."
Its response can be found in here:
https://picasaweb.google.com/114731102020557937402/EvidenceForMrAttorneyGener...
1 ) 2011 Non Lethal Capabilities International Trade Show and Conference hosted by Canadian Department of National Deface.
http://www.defenceandsecurity.ca/UserFiles/File/2011/2011NATD/NATDNonLethalFl...
2) Non-Lethal Weapons Facing International Humanitarian Law     ICRC-The International Committee of the Red Cross
http://www.non-lethal-weapons.com/sy02abstracts/V3.pdf
Science & Technology Committee of NATO regarding the use of non lethal weapons against civilians
"Discussions on the use of "non-lethal" weapons in situations involving riot-control, hostage-rescue, peacekeeping and peace-enforcement operations, as well as in traditional warfare situations, have so far focused mainly on the technology and engagement doctrine of these new weapons - see the Assembly's report "Non-Lethal Weapons" by Lord Lyell, General Rapporteur [AP 238 STC (97) 8]. The ICRC experts have studied both the effects of "non-lethal" weapons on health and how they would be used in the light of international humanitarian laws. According to their conclusions, presented by Dr. Robin Coupland, all references to "lethal" or "non-lethal" oversimplify the effects of weapons and are therefore misleading. The so-called "non-lethal" weapons (such as infrasound, electromagnetic waves or sticky foams) can indeed have severe effects on health depending on the circumstances in which they are deployed or on their possible combination with existing conventional weapons. According to ICRC, the military use of "non-lethal" weapons against civilians could undermine the existing norms of international law pertaining to armed conflict as well as the 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention and the 1925 Geneva Protocol. The organisation recommended that current efforts to integrate "non-lethal" weapons into operations of armed forces should address more properly the legal, health and tactical implications of doing so."
http://www.nato-pa.int/archivedpub/trip/at189stcmt005-geneva.asp
Defence Research and Development Canada stated the followings below regarding the use of Non Lethal Weapons: Its Taxonomy available now. (Page 148) Legal and Ethical Constraints (Page 8)
http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA436202
3 ) 2002 Media Guide to Disarmament in Geneva Re.Non Lethal Weapons
http://unidir.org/pdf/ouvrages/pdf-1-92-9045-002-2-en.pdf
4 ) Statement from Canadian Government Re Exotic Weapons.
"Numerous analysts studying these issues have stated that discussion is long overdue and should begin immediately, particularly with more transparency, accountability and information available to the public in several countries. The domestic and international implications of the use and misuse of several exotic weapons and nonlethal variants are serious and require a higher priority by the Canadian government and international fora."
http://www.international.gc.ca/arms
5 ) Non lethal weapons, mind Control Weapons, psychotronic weapons
The 2002 UNIDIR endorsement of a Mind Justice article on nonlethal, emr, and mind control weapons, and nonconsensual experiments Mind control weapons are a serious enough threat to be included along side nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons in a document published by the UNIDIR.17 The "2002 Media Guide to Disarmament in Geneva" was compiled to help the Geneva-based media bring disarmament issues "to the attention of the wider world." Mind Justice is one of six non-lethal weapons experts cited by UNIDIR. Others include Human Rights Watch, International Committee of the Red Cross, and University of Bradford Department of Peace Studies. The Media Guide includes a nonlethal weapons "links" section to the Center for Defense Information, the University of Bradford, Nonlethal Weapons Research Project, and to my article, "Nonlethal Weapons: A Global Issue."18 In the article I present numerous comments and warnings by international experts and public figures about mind control weapons. The article presents specific allegations regarding nonconsensual government experiments and classified nonlethal weapons which target the brain and nervous system, or as they are popularly known by the emotionally charged term, "mind control." Called information and psychotronic weapons in Russia and China, mind control weapons are included in the category of nonlethal weapons in the 2002 Disarmament Guide. http://mindjustice.org/

Key words: Non-Lethal Weapons, International Humanitarian Law( the law of war by UN) , ICRC

Non-Lethal Weapons Facing International Humanitarian Law

The International Committee of the Red Cross

In the on-going debate about emerging technologies which are to be used as so-called "non-lethal weapons" it has proven not only useful but necessary to address questions related to the rules pertinent to international humanitarian law, also called the law of war. A number of questions in this field have been discussed over the last years but the correct understanding and implementation of these rules with regard to "non-lethal weapons" has shown many times to be more complex than expected. The law of war contains obligations and in this sense it goes much further than just addressing ethical, moral or even public opinion issues.

Our paper would address the legal obligations which are contained in the law of war and which are pertinent to "non-lethal weapons", in particular when they are developed for use in times of armed conflicts, including military operations other than war or military operations in urban terrain. The basic principles of the law of war and existing treaties which restrict or prohibits some "non-lethal weapons" will also be mentioned. In the law of war there is also an obligation to carry out legal reviews in a multidisciplinary approach which is very much relevant to emerging technologies since often their wounding effect is not known.

Finally it is also the intent to present findings about the wounding mechanisms and the effects on humans of currently used weapons in most of the conflicts. This would help putting the term "non-lethal" in a more realistic perspective, in particular compared to other weapons, so-called conventional "lethal" weapons.

http://www.non-lethal-weapons.com/sy02abstracts/V3.pdf

First response to the Canadian Government's statement regarding our petition, which stated in its response to us: " The Government has no information on any such activities."

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3QpbrnCiAQ&feature=channel

Non Lethal Weapons, Mind Control Weapons, or  psychotronic weapons has been listed as weapons of Mass Destruction by UNIDIR-UN

http://unidir.org/pdf/ouvrages/pdf-1-92-9045-002-2-en.pdf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCS1am5SbdM&feature=channel

"Numerous analysts studying these issues have stated that discussion is long overdue and should begin immediately, particularly with more transparency, accountability and information available to the public in several countries. The domestic and international implications of the use and misuse of several exotic weapons and nonlethal variants are serious and require a higher priority by the Canadian government and international fora."

http://www.international.gc.ca/arms-armes/isrop-prisi/research-recherche/humanitarian-humanitaire/mchale2003/section07.aspx?lang=en&view=d

UN stated clearly on how to deal with torture. Please take time to read it carefully.

http://www.hrweb.org/legal/cat.html

International Class Action Lawsuit

Dear Friends and Colleagues,

Please send me your statement of claim if you are a t.i.  A statement of claim is your personal account of how, when, where and why you became a  t.i. victim. Who you believe is the defendant responsible for you being a targeted individual and causing you pain and suffering. How your life is being handicapped and impaired from your normal everyday life. The courts are barely familiar with our language of MK-Ultra,V2-K, Medusa Tech, Micro-Wave and Mind Control Technologies. Keep your written testimony to no more than 3 pages and do not drift into speculation. Stick to the facts about what you know and imagine a normal person with no knowledge of t.i.'s is reading your statement of claim. The Lordship's and Her Majesty's Court will for the first time read the written transcripts and watch the videos from the Presidential Committee Hearings.

http://www.bioethics.gov/cms/node/203 , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9mMeoD-s9g .

They will hear from expert witnesses. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvn-8ITy0oc&feature=share

and watch several important videos on torture using invisible technology. The courtroom will be filled with all the t.i.'s living in the United Kingdom. They will be introduced as local victims, material witnesses and plaintiffs in our class action lawsuit.

We will not be over ruled by 'Ultra Virus' conduct or dismissed using Sec. 19-24, Hard to Prove and Frivolous. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aa-FVHtcckY&feature=share

http://www.emrpolicy.org/litigation/case_law/docs/att_alascom_v_orchitt.pdf

We are building a Strong Solid Case against, the Epidemic of Invisible Technology, no one cares about.

The courts are just becoming aware of invisible technology targeting individuals. Do not have flights of fancy and talk about Perps, God, Aliens, the Bible or Karma. You are a good person who happened to fall prey to a nightmare of technology impairing and tormenting your normal life. The technology used on you is a human rights violation under the laws of civilized countries. I am hoping to start a Royal Commissioners Inquiry, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2SR9VcdILE Just like Commissioner Braidwood's Inquiry in British Columbia. The Taser is a Direct Energy Weapon. Look at the other statement of claims at the bottom of the comments in this link. http://rewardforinformation.blogspot.com/2010/03/1000000.html

Do the best you can and if you have any medical wellness reports, please send them. Invite any t.i.'s you know, who need our help. This is not brain surgery, just legal maneuvering to win. You are a targeted individual and our Human Rights Laws protect you against torture in the United Kingdom.

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt200506/jtselect/jtrights/185/185-ii.pdf

The U K should also examine whether the conduct amounts to a crime of torture subject to the jurisdiction of the international criminal court or universal jurisdiction under the torture convention. Similarly, the U K would be under an obligation to investigate how the information came into the hands of the UK police and/or other UK offcials.

The Arar Inquiry in Canada, established to investigate Canadian complicity in the rendition of a Canadian national to torture in Syria in 2002, has made it clear that when torture is committed abroad it does not occur in a vacuum. Evidence before the Inquiry showed that the Canadian police shared intelligence with the Syrian Government knowing that there was a real risk that Maher Arar was being ill treated. If the British Government obtains information knowing it has been extracted by torture, it is bound under international law to conduct an independent investigation to establish whether UK agents were complicit, and to take appropriate measures to prevent similar acts in the future. If the UK Government were to accept the material without raising questions about the illegal conduct by the sending Government, investigating potential violations of international criminal law, and signaling its profound opposition to the use of torture under any circumstances, then it would be effectively condoning the torture that took place, and arguably be encouraging further torture, in breach of its erga omnes obligations to prevent torture.

If everyone will send me their statement of claim by the end of April 2012 - subject line: International Class Action Lawsuit - I will swear the new affidavit, under oath to include all the t.i. participants in early May and file the class action lawsuit by the end of May. I have most of the Canadians from Galina, several dozen t.i. victims from around the world and am hoping for more. We have strength in greater numbers. Any help is much obliged.

Cheers,

~Jonathan

Humanrightsuniverse@gmail.com

"Injustice never rules forever"

The misuse of Microwave weapons
Lynn A Surgalla, Former Vice-President United States Psychotronics Association
PO Box 2
Monmouth Beach, NJ 07750

To the Court:

As Former Vice-President of the United States Psychotronics Association, I assure the Court that the illegal testing, development and use of Psychotronic, Microwave, Laser and other forms of Electromagnetic Directed Energy Weaponry is a matter of grave concern to both the US and International Communities. These weapons are ALL potentially LETHAL, although sublethal injuries may also be inflicted as with the use of any other lethal weapon such as a gun, knife or chemical poison. Assault and Battery and/or torture/murder with any form of Directed Energy Weapon IS Assault and Battery and/or torture/murder with a LETHAL WEAPON. Despite claims to the contrary by criminal elements in our own government, there is NO SUCH THING as a NONLETHAL WEAPON (even those currently in vogue for “Slow Kill” torture-interrogati on by war criminals worldwide).

In 2001, HR2977, The Space Preservation Act (2001) was introduced into Congress to BAN ALL Directed Energy Weapons. Its passage has thusfar been blocked. In 2002, the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) formally listed a NEW CATEGORY of WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION (Psychotronic Mind Control and other Electromagnetic Resonance Weapons) in their 2002 Media Guide to Disarmament. In 2003, the State of Michigan passed into Law House Bills 4513 and 4514 BANNING the use of ALL FORMS of ELECTROMAGNETIC WEAPONS against Human Beings in the State of Michigan . In 1999, the European Union Parliament passed Resolution A4-0005/1999 Section 27 which “Calls for an International Convention introducing a GLOBAL BAN on all developments and deployments of weapons which might enable any forms of manipulation of Human Beings.” (PSYCHOTRONIC WEAPONS).

Ms Millicent Gabrielson’s claim of being assaulted with some form of DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPON is to be taken very seriously. If the criminal assailants are found to be law enforcement personnel or government employees, then the crime is an EVEN MORE SERIOUS OFFENSE with grave political implications. If the crime is found to be racially or religiously- motivated torture-assault, then the bias-crime laws also apply.

I assure you that similar cases are being addressed all over the world and that Ms Gabrielson’s case is not unique. Please give this case your closest attention. The INTERNATIONAL HUMAN-RIGHTS COMMUNITY is deeply interested in the outcome and concerned that justice be served in all cases of Directed Energy Weapons assault.

Attached to this letter is a copy of my resume and relevant pages from HR2977 which lists the forms of Electromagnetic Directed Energy Weaponry currently in use.

Sincerely,
Lynn A. Surgalla
Former Vice-President
United States Psychotronics Association

Lynn A. Surgalla Videos
寛頻觀看.wmv　撥號觀看.wmv
A4-0005/1999 Section 27　HR2977
2002 Media Guide to Disarmament

German doctors unite

http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/news/20050722_bamberg.asp

Medical Report

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7123&fb_source=message#.TsXofmm8Gh9.email

Julian N. Falconer ( Maher Arar, torture case)

http://fcbarristers.com/Falconer/lawyers.html

Alan Stein ( mind control case)

http://www.archive.org/details/alanstein041207

International criminal justice standards and Non Lethal Weapons NATO policy that express : ... “The research and development

 procurement and employment of Non-Lethal Weapons shall always remain consistent with applicable treaties, conventions and international law, particularly the Law of Armed conflict as well as national law and approved Rules of Engagement.”

 International criminal justice standards The following criminal justice standards were adopted under the auspices of the United Nations: 

• 1979 Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials, and the • 1990 Basic Principles on the Use of Force. (Page 36)

 http://www.adh-geneve.ch/docs/projets/Non-Kinetic-EnergyOctober2010.pdf

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2012/02/17/canada-science-climate-change-harper_n_1285613.html

Forensic Evidence in the Fight Against Torture

 • Increase the availability of high quality forensic documentation concerning allegations of torture

 • Use and facilitate victims’ access to forensic documentation as evidence in legal proceedings

 • Increase awareness of the significance of medical forensic evidence, victims’ rights and state obligations under the U.N. Convention against Torture to investigate and prosecute perpetrators

http://www.wcl.american.edu/ilp/documents/ForensicEvidenceagenda.pdf?rd=1