Comments

• 

  ron August 23, 2009 at 11:09pm

  Previous Posts and Evidence-To be used by International World Courts of Justice for the prosecution of crimes against humanity. Direct Violation of the United Nations Article 1 Declaration against torture,Violation of the Geneva Conventions, Violation of the Helsinki Doctrine, Violation of the US Constitution.
  .
  
  http://mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profiles/blog/list?user=0kz9qz9diii3m
  
  
  Report: CIA hired Blackwater contractors for secret hit squad-the a...
  

  http://rawstory.com/08/news/2009/08/19/cia-hired-blackwater/Report: CIA hired Blackwater contractors for secret hit squad
  
  
  
  

  
  

  … Continue

  Added by ron angell on August 21, 2009 at 6:00am — 5 Comments
  

  Army's Chemical Corps at Edgewood Arsenal in Maryland ended up cond...

  
  

  THANK YOU !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  
  

  From:

  … Continue

  Added by ron angell on August 21, 2009 at 12:30am —3 Comments
  

  Previous Posts and Evidence-To be used by International World Court...

  Previous Posts and Evidence-To be used by International World Courts of Justice for the prosecution of crimes against humanity. Direct Violation of the United Nations Article 1 Declaration against torture,Violation of the Geneva Conventions, Violation of the Helsinki Doctrine

  .
  
  

  50 US War Criminals http://afterdowningstreet.org/warcriminals

  … Continue
  

  Added by ron angell on August 20, 2009 at 5:30pm — 2 Comments

  50 US War Criminals http://afterdowning street.org/ warcriminals

  50 US War Criminals
  http://afterdowning street.org/ warcriminals
  
  
  From:
  
  v911t@yahoogroups.com [mailto:v911t@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Lynn
  Surgalla
  Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 8:21 PM
  
  To: v911t@ya… Continue
  

  
  

  Added by ron angell on August 20, 2009 at 6:25am — 2 Comments

  Diseased African Monkeys Used to Make Swine Flu Vaccines; DYNACORP ...

  
  
  The Paperchase TV SERIES-Remember it?
  
  ACLU… Continue
  
  

  Added by ron angell on August 20, 2009 at 12:58am — 4 Comments

  Woman Convicted in Fake Flu Vaccine Case for her involvement in the...

  http://houston.fbi.gov/dojpressrel/pressrel09/ho081709a.htmWoman Convicted in Fake Flu Vaccine Case Sentenced for Violating
  Probation
  Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:29:21 -0500
  
  Martha Denise Gonzales, who was convicted in 2007 and sentenced to a
  five-year term of probation for her involvement in the distribution of a
  fake flu vaccine to more than 1000 persons in the Houston area, was
  sentenced to 21 months in feder… Continue
  

  
  

  Added by ron angell on August 19, 2009 at 4:10am — No Comments

  The Paperchase TV SERIES-Remember it?

  The Paperchase TV SERIES-Remember it?ACLU
  
  
  http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=263169266607891699&ei=M...… Continue
  
  

  Added by ron angell on August 18, 2009 at 8:00pm — 2 Comments

  On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light...

  http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7123On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind Invasive Technology
  
  by Carole Smith
  
  .
  Global Research, October 18, 2007
  Journal of Psycho-Social Studies, 2003.
  
  "We have failed to comprehend that the result of the technology that originated in the years of the arms race between the Soviet Union and the West, has resulted in… Continue
  
  

  Added by ron angell on August 18, 2009 at 5:45pm — 3 Comments

  http://www.thefluecase.com by jame burgermeister of Austria- thank ...

  http://www.theflucase.com/Laws and the Constitution assign to people certain basic civic rights, such as the right to life, the right to free speech, the right to self defence. Another right, is the right to report a crime if there is enough evidence of one.
  
  Laws and the Constitution assign to people certain basic civic rights, such as the right to life, the right to free speech, the right to self defence.
  
  Flowing from these basic civic… Continue
  

  
  

  Added by ron angell on August 18, 2009 at 5:02pm — 5 Comments

  Complaint to stop enforced vaccinations in Washhington State filed ...

  http://www.theflucase.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=art... Complaint to stop enforced vaccinations in Washhington State… Continue
  

  Added by ron angell on August 18, 2009 at 4:33pm — 2 Comments

  MKULTRA: Veterans Sue CIA Over Past Chemical Tests on Soldiers

  ACLU
  MKULTRA: Veterans Sue CIA Over Past Chemical Tests on Soldiers
  "Saddam Hussein is a man who is willing to gas his own people, willing to use weapons of mass destruction against Iraq citizens." - President Bush, March 22, 2002 (For the record - and so I'm not accused of GOP-style Saddam-baiting - blood tests of the gassed Kurds at Halabja in 1988, conducted by US… Continue
  
  

  Added by ron angell on August 17, 2009 at 10:00pm — 6 Comments

  Diseased African Monkeys Used to Make Swine Flu Vaccines; DYNACORP ...

  Diseased African Monkeys Used to Make Swine Flu Vaccines; Private Military Contractor Holds Key Patents http://www.google.com/#hl=en&ei=4JmJSsy9GYmwtgfTsNjnDA&sa=X...… Continue
• 

  Robin Yan August 20, 2009 at 7:40am

  Dear all victims:
  
  Topic: The evidence being collected, captured and intercepted; and the
  way I find to protect myself from those non-lethal weapons.
  
  I, Robin Yan, as a victim of torture through the use of non-lethal weapons and the gang-stalking, happened in Canada, make a statement to our victims and the people in the world, as follows:
  
  In the near future, I will disclose those hard evidence to the world to testify that the torture through the non-lethal weapons, mind control, TI, direct energy weapons… really exist in our world. In the meanwhile, the way I find to protect myself from those non-lethal weapons will be disclosed for our victims and the people in the world.
  
  
  Best regards,
  
  Robin Yan
  
  19/08/2009
• 

  ron June 23, 2009 at 7:32am

  Means of information war threaten democracy and mankind -Thank you Mojmir Babacek from Czech and John Allman from the UK

  
  Deepest thanks to Mojmir Babacek and John Allman. Very wonderfully written and very very helpful.
  
  Thank you so very very much!!
  
  Ron Angell
  
  
  Download entire document in this Blog post from the below link:
  
  Means of Information War Threaten Democracy and Mankind.doc
  
  
  ----- Forwarded Message ----
  From: Mojmir Babacek
  To: ron
  Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 4:08:00 PM
  Subject: article which could break secrecy sorrouding mind control weapons
  
  
  Hello,
  in the attachement I am e-mailing you an article whose wide dissemination could break the secrecy surrounding mind control technology. I am e-mailing the article all aroung the world, asking people for help. Could you help with the dissemination? I have managed to publish it on the Czech Internet newspaper and on several information servers here. Isn't there any place where you could place it? I believe you would really help to a good thing to happen. I have already found people who are not victims of mind control experimentation and are willing to participate in this effort.
  Mojmir Babacek
  
  
  means of information war threaten democracy and mankind
  
  Mojmir Babacek
  (edited by John Allman)
  
  In the report on U.S. military policy by Project for New American Century it is stated: "It is now commonly understood that information and other new technologies … are creating a dynamic that may threaten America's ability to exercise its dominant military power. Potential rivals, such as China are anxious to exploit those transformational technologies broadly, while adversaries like Iran, Iraq and North Korea are rushing to develop ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons … the effects of information and other advanced technologies promise to revolutionize the nature of conventional armed forces" (ref. 13, pg. 4 and 11). The military concept of information technologies is, though, kept hidden from the world general public.
  In February 2000 the Russian daily Segodnya, in the article "Riders of Psychotronic Apocalypse" (1), informed that in 1996 Russian government's information agency FAPSI warned that the effect of "informational means of war" is comparable to "the effect of use of weapon of mass destruction" and produced a report entitled "Information Weapon as a Threat to National Security of Russia". In reaction the Russian State Duma and consequently Interparliamentary Assembly of the Union of Independent States addressed the United Nations, OBSE and European Council with a proposal for an international convention banning the development and use of informational weapons. According to the same newspaper Segodnya in March 1998, the matter was discussed with U.N. secretary general Kofi Anan, and included on the agenda of General Assembly of the U.N. Most probably the USA vetoed this proposal and in consequence the ban of informational weapons was not discussed by the General Assembly of the United Nations.
  In the Doctrine of Informational Security of the Russian Federation, signed by president Putin in September 2000, among the dangers threatening the informational security of Russian Federation, is listed “the threat to the constitutional rights and freedoms of people and citizens in the sphere of spiritual life… individual, group and societal consciousness” and “illegal use of special means affecting individual, group and societal consciousness.” (16). Among the major directions of the international cooperation toward the guaranteeing of the information security is listed “the ban of production, dissemination and use of ‘information weapons’.”(17).
  Segodnya, in the discussed article, described mostly "mysterious information-psychological" means capable not only of harming human health, but also of blocking human free will at the subconscious level, impairing human beings’ ability of “political, cultural and other self-identification" and even “causing destruction of indivisible informational and spiritual space of the Russian Federation”. According to Russian scientist A. F. Okhatrin, those means are also capable to kill people (2). Underneath the article, Segodnya published a review of weapons affecting human psyche which it obtained from the Russian Department of Defense. Together with ultrasound and microwave weapons, there are listed "psychotronic weapons" which, in addition to having the capability of "transfering information among people", are able to act on communication and electronic systems (1).
  In the Space Preservation Bill proposed by Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich in the U.S. House of Representatives in 2001, the following technologies enabling access to human brain, human health impairment or killing of people were named: "land-based, sea-based or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood managment or mind control of such persons or populations" (4). "Psychotronic weapon" listed in the Dennis J. Kucinich's bill is described as a weapon using "torsion fields" radiation in the book "Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia" (6) by Russian scientist Vladimir Tsygankov and Vladimir Lopatin (a politician, who worked on Committees on Security in Russian Federal Republic, State Duma of the Russian Federation and the Interparliamentary Assembly of the Union of Independent States). Among the possible sources of remote influence on human psyche those two authors list “generators of physical fields” of "known as well as unknown nature" (14). It is well known that both KGB and CIA carried out a large-scale research of psychic phenomena in the 70’s of the past century. It is not out of question that their scientists succeded in discovering the physical basis of those phenomena. The physical concept of non-local electron and photon connection can be certainly used to explain those phenomena.
  The ability of sound and light technologies to influence human psyche is exemplified by Psychowalkman industry. The existence of the electromagnetic mind control technology is confirmed in the Conclusion of the Committee on Security of the Russian State Duma [3] and can be deduced from scientific and military literature.
  Nerve impulses in the brain are carried by electrical signals triggered by changes in chemical balance. During the fifties and sixties of the past century, it was proved that human nervous system and behavior can be thoroughly controlled by electric signals imported to the brain by tiny electrodes (41). 100 stimulations of one point in the bull‘s brain made him 100 times bellow. When a man was asked to straighten his hand the bending of which was stimulated he replied “I think your electricity is stronger then my will.” By means of electrical stimulation of the brain the rhythm of breathing and heart beat [this was even stopped for several pulses] was affected as well as the function of the most of the viscera - alike the secretion of the gall bladder. The stimulation of points in the brain where feelings and emotions reside produced decisions. A passive, depressed woman tore up a piece of paper when her center of anger was stimulated: “I did not control myself. I had to get up and tear”, she commented. An aggressive woman, with the same point stimulated, got up and smashed against the wall the guitar she was playing until the moment of stimulation. The intensity of feelings could be controlled by turning the knob which controlled the intensity of the electric current. When the pleasure center was stimulated women offered marriage to therapists. Stimulation of a point in a monkey‘s brain stopped her maternal behavior toward a newborn baby. When the limbic system was stimulated the patients vigilance weakened, they lost capacity to think, often they began to undress or grope and when the stimulation stopped they did not remember it. The signals had to be delivered in specific frequencies to produce repetitive action of neurons. Spanish scientist Jose Delgado became world known when he, with the use of this technology, made a bull attack him by pressing one button on the small black box and stopped the bull few feet away from him by pressing another button.
  The idea that electric currents in the brain could be induced by electromagnetic energy is an obvious next step in this path of research. The information inside of the brain is processed digitally; in other words analog perceptions are “translated” and transferred by a number and frequency of nerve impulses, while the intensity of the feeling or perception usually corresponds to the intensity of electrical current. Walter J. Freeman, who had been for years measuring the brain activity in reaction to different stimuli by multitudes of microelectrodes, presented already in 1975 a hypothesis “that a novel external stimulus is broadly transmitted from the primary sensory cortex or thalamus to other parts of the cortex... transmission occurs at some characteristic frequency, and...reception occurs in ... sets tuned to that frequency” (37). In other words, when neurons cooperate in the processing of specific information they synchronize their activity and oscillate in the same frequency. In an experiment by Wolf Singer (20) the differences in brain activity in reaction to two different stimuli, presented to the tested subject at the same time, were represented by two different groups of neurons oscillating in different frequencies. In the modern scientific literature synchronization of frequencies of emitted nerve impulses in different parts of the brain as a principle of brain functioning is generally accepted (19). Electroencephalographers have no doubt that those synchronizations appear on the EEG recordings and are already able to “read” in those frequencies the single letters of a word perceived by the tested subject (21). Theoretically this means that the events in the brain can be produced “synthetically” from the outside when additional energy is pumped into the brain in specific frequencies corresponding to specific brain activities. John Marks, in his book on CIA mind control research, quotes one of the CIA research veterans recalling a colleague’s joke: “If you could find the natural radio frequency of a person‘s sphincter, you could make him run out of the room real fast” (22). Since most of the activity of human brain takes place in frequencies from 1 to 100 Hz and electromagnetic waves of this frequency are hundreds and even thousands of miles long, and, for that matter, could not target human brain, scientists started experimenting with pulsed microwaves. There exist “window” frequencies at which microwaves penetrate deep enough into the brain to produce activity of neurons.
  The interaction of electromagnetic radiation and chemicals in the brain was demonstrated for example by the experiment where irradiation of rats’ heads by 20 and 40 mW/cm2 microwaves pulsed at 300, 600 and 1000 Hz woke the rats up in 5 minutes from narcosis (23). Electrical signals of neurons in the brain are mediated by chemicals called neurotransmitters. At a conference on “Emerging Electromagnetic Medicine” in 1989 Capt. Paul Tyler, director of the U.S. Navy Electromagnetic Radiation Project between 1970 and 1977, quoted in his lecture the research of Dr. Merrit who measured the decrease of norepinephrine, serotonine and dopamine when a field of 80 mW/cm2 was applied (24). All those hormones act as neurotransmitters into the cortex. Dopamin influences the ability to learn and other cognitive abilities. Disruption in the biosynthesis or transmission of dopamine can lead to Parkinson’s disease. In another experiment a 500Hz signal produced release of neradrenaline in sympathetical neurons (25). Since those neurons control the muscles of internal organs and noraderenaline acts there as a neurotransmitter, an oposite signal should be able to reduce the activity of internal organs and eventually impair human health. The publication of the World Health Organization on the effects of electromagnetic radiation on living organisms from 1981 (25) gives many examples of the effects of microwave radiation on the excretion of glands and chemical composition of blood. Many of those effects could harm human health. Microwave radiation can also affect molecules of DNA and thus affect the development of organisms (25). This was proved by an experiment by Yale neurophysiologist, Jose Delgado, where the irradiation of chicken embryos by 10, 100 and 1000 Hz stopped their development including the development of hearts and veins. The experiment was replicated by the American Navy with the same results. Such attack by microwaves could have, in the long run, disastrous impact on targeted populations.
  A a matter of fact microwave radiation can produce many deadly effects. In the experiment by McAffee already mentioned, the microwaves pulsed at 300, 600 and 1000 Hz produced impairment in breathing (leading even to suffocation) in rats. A similar signal could also suffocate human beings. At the conference on Nonlinear Electrodynamics in Biological Systems in 1983 the experiment was presented where blood clots were formed by microwave radiation (26). This capability is also suitable for weaponisation. Similarly dangerous is the finding of Allan Frey that radio frequency radiation can weaken the blood-brain barrier that prevents poisonous chemicals from the access into the brain (30). In 1986 the American Air Force issued a book “Low Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology” (18). The chapter headed “Electromagnetic Spectrum in Low Intensity Conflict”, was written by Capt. Paul Tyler, who had been the director of the U.S. Navy Electromagnetic Radiation Project from 1970 until 1977. At the beginning of the chapter, Tyler quotes a source entitled “Final Report on Biotechnology Research Requirements for Aeronautical Systems Through the Year 2000” that had been issued by American Air Force in 1982: “Currently available data allow the projection that specially generated radiofrequency radiation (RFR) fields may pose a powerful and revolutionary antipersonnel military threats ... the passage of approximately 100 miliamperes through the myocardium can lead to cardiac standstill and death ... A rapidly scanning RFR system could provide an effective stun or kill capability over a large area. System effectiveness will be a function of wave form, field intensity, pulse width, repetition frequency, and carrier frequency.”
  In less draconian assault, the use of microwaves could be limited just to the influence of human behavior. In 1985 Kathleen McAuliffe visited Jose Delgado in his laboratory in Spain, where he experimented with electromagnetic stimulation of brain. She subsequently wrote an article for the magazine OMNI (27). Jose Delgado showed her how he could make an ape fall asleep, or make it overactive, or how he could calm down fighting fish using suitably modulated microwave radiation.
  The next series of experiments shows that human behavior can be controlled in even more intricate ways. In 1962 Allan H. Frey published in the “Journal of Applied Physiology” (28) the results of experimentation with transmission of sounds into the brain by electromagnetic radiation at a distance of up to 1000 feet. The “electromagnetic” sounds were heard by deaf as well as hearing people. In his report, Frey writes that, by then, only the visual system had been shown to respond to electromagnetic energy and he noted that, “With somewhat different transmission parameters we can induce the perception of severe buffeting of the head..” and ”Changing ... parameters again, one can induce a ‘pins-and-needles’ sensation.” Frey’s experiment was replicated several times by other scientists (28). Another, more advanced experiment that also involved the transmission of radio modulated with audible sounds into the brain, was published only inadvertently, when Don R. Justesen used, in the article on "Microwaves and Behavior" (29), the result of an experiment described to him over the telephone conversation by his colleague J. C. Sharp, who worked on a secret military project Pandora. Joseph C. Sharp at the Walter Reed Army Institute improved the method of Frey to the point that he was able to transmit into the experimental subject’s brain words which he could understand. The ability of U.S. military to produce perception of speech in humans by microwave radiation substantiates the article by Sharon Weinberger, “Mind Games”, which was published in The Washington Post in January 2007. In response to a Freedom of Information Act request filed for the article the Air Force released “records that note that the patent was based on human experimentation in October 1994 at the Air Force lab, where scientists were able to transmit phrases into the heads of human subjects” The article also states that “the research laboratory, citing classification, refused to discuss it or release other materials” (31).
  Robert Becker, who was twice nominated for Nobel price for his share in the discovery of the effects of pulsed fields at the healing of broken bones, wrote about the experiment by J. F. Schapitz, who stated: “In this investigation it will be shown that the spoken word of hypnotist may also be conveyed by modulated electromagnetic energy directly into the subconcscious parts of the human brain - i. e. without employing any technical devices for receiving or transcoding the messages and without the person exposed to such influence having a chance to control the information input consciously.” In one of the four experiments subjects were given a test of hundred questions, ranging from easy to technical ones. Later, not knowing they were being irradiated, they would be subjected to information beams suggesting the answers to the questions they had left blank, amnesia for some of their correct answers, and memory falsification for other correct answers. After 2 weeks they had to pass the test again (30). The results of those experiments were never published. Apparently in those experiments the messages were sent into human brain in ultrasound frequencies which the human brain perceives, but of which the subject is unaware. According to Russian newspapers, in this way, people may be programmed to perform different actions in the same way people can be programmed under hypnosis. The use of this method was questioned in the Russian press when general Lev Rokhlin was killed by his wife in his sleep at 2 a.m. after she had had a casual telephone conversation with a female friend. Did her friend use a sequence of words which were supposed to trigger the murderous action? Before his murder General Rokhlin planned for army protests against army reform and visited editor’s desks of Russian newspapers, telling them he might be soon killed in a car accident, during a drinking spree or during an argument with his wife (42).
  In his book “Cross Currents” Robert Becker presents the report coming from the Microwave Research Department at the Walter Reed Army Institute, where J.C. Sharp carried out his experiment with the transmission of words into the brain by radiofrequency radiation. The report deals with the effects of pulsed microwaves on the nervous system and describes the division of testing program into four parts: 1) prompt debilitating effects; 2) prompt stimulation auditory effects; 3) work interference (stoppage) effects; 4) effects on stimulus controlled behavior. The report presents this conclusion: “Microwave pulses appear to couple to the central nervous system and produce stimulation similar to electrical stimulation unrelated to heat” (32).
  The American Air Force, according to the Final Report on Biotechnology Research Requirements for Aeronautical Systems Through the Year 2000, divided the research of radiofrequency weapons into three areas: 1) Pulsed RFR Effects - projected research since 1980 until 1995; 2) “Mechanisms of RFR with Living Systems” referred to as “continuation of ongoing research” beginning in 1980 and forecast to conclude around 1997;
  3) “RFR forced disruptive phenomena” - starting around 1986 with the projected
  continuation until 2010. In the second volume of this report, it was stated that the work on the project was progressing according to the schedule or in advance. The last-mentioned area of research is redefined in the second volume: “While initial attention should be toward degradation of human performance through thermal loading and electromagnetic field effects, subsequent work should address the possibilities of directing and interrogating mental functioning, using externally applied fields...” (33).
  In the Soviet Russia the ongoing research in this area was completely hidden from the public, but change of political system and actual use of this equipment during the putsch against Gorbachov brought this subject to newspapers headlines. According to Russian daily newspapers, during the failed coup d'etat against Gorbachov, General Kobets warned the defenders of the Russian White House that mind control technology could be used against them. After the putsch, respected Russian scientist Victor Sedlecki published a statement in the Russian daily Komsomolskaya Pravda that psychotronic biogenerators were mass produced in the Soviet Union and were used during the failed coup d'etat [7], but failed to succeed due to the inexperience of the personel who operated them. In the following spree of articles on the subject of mind control, the experiment was published where manipulation of masses of people by microwave radiation was performed. Already in 1974, after successful testing on a military unit in Novosibirsk, the installation Radioson (Radiosleep) was registered with the Government Committee on the Matters of Inventions and Discoveries of the USSR, described as a method of induction of sleep by means of radio waves. Apparently, in 1974, the entire military unit was put to sleep (5).
  In the book “Low Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology” (18), Captain Tyler also wrote: “Because of the many parameters involved and the apparent specificity of each parameter, one can tailor a specific response. The ability to have this kind of flexibility provides an enormous range of options to the user. It opens the door for providing an appropriate response in warfare, be it conventional or unconventional” (18). If you object that the range of frequencies in which the human nervous system works is too narrow to provide for such a wide choice of reactions, Capt. Tyler writes: “There are unconfirmed reports that change of 0.01 Hz can make a difference.” Since many activities of human brain are represented by different sequences of frequencies, this provides for further large choices.
  At the end of 1994 the first tests of the most powerful radar system in the world were carried out in Alaska. This year its power should reach 10 billion watts and later 100 billion watts. The main features of the system include its ability to heat the ionosphere and in this way change the altitude of the ionosphere. By this kind of manipulation of the ionosphere, it is possible to bounce the electromagnetic waves back from the ionosphere to whichever region of the planet one wishes to target. According to the official information by the U.S. government the system HAARP is designed for scientific research. However, there are too many facts suggesting that the major reason for its construction are military purposes. The main patent of Bernard J. Eastlund (number 4,686,605) proposes the use of the system for destruction of navigation systems of airplanes and missiles wherever in the atmosphere they might be, and for interference with all communication systems anywhere on the planet, and the global weather control. Other patents connected with the system propose the use of the system for induction of detonations in the extent of nuclear explosions and other military uses (33).
  Evidently, the warning of Russian intelligence agency FAPSI to the Russian government and the article in the Russian daily “Segodnya” were amongst the recations to the installation of the U.S. system HAARP. The HAARP system can pulse microwave radiation begining from one thousandth of one Hertz and, in this case, there is hardly and doubt that it can change pulses of microwave radiation by 1 thousandth of Hertz, as well in frequencies from 1 to 100 Hertz which are crucial for the functioning of human nervous system. In June 1995, Michael Persinger, who apparently worked on the American Navy's project of non-lethal electromagnetic weapons “Sleeping Beauty”, published, in a scientific magazine Perception and Motor Skills the article where he states: “the technical capability to influence directly the major portion of the approximately six billion brains of the human species without mediation through classical sensory modalities by generating neural information within a physical medium within which all members of the species are immersed… is now marginally feasible” (34).
  John B. Alexander, who later became the Director of Non-lethal Programs in Los Alamos National Laboratory, wrote in his article in the Military Review in the year 1980: “whoever makes the first major breakthrough in this field will have a quantum lead over his opponent, an advantage similar to sole possession of nuclear weapons” (35). Samuel Koslov, a leading personality of the Pandora project that was dedicated to research of effects of microwave radiation on humans, and a researcher at the John Hopkins University, in his closing speech at the conference on Nonlinear Electrodynamics in Biological Systems in 1984, said that the conference had proven that the external electric fields can “become a key to the cellular control console. The implications, social, economic, and even military are enormous.” Koslov went on: “If much of what we have heard is indeed correct, it may be not less significant to the nation than the prospects that faced the physics community in 1939 when the long-time predicted fissionability of the nucleus was actually demonstrated. You may recall the famous letter of Albert Einstein to President Roosvelt. When we’re in a position to do so in terms of our proofs, I would propose that an analogous letter is required” (26).
  It is this perspective, of the revolutionary nature of these scientific developments, that gives us the title, “Revolution in Military Affairs and Conflict Short of War”, of a book published by the Strategic Studies Institute at the U.S. Army War College in 1994 (36). Since the national security information is in question, the book cannot tell the readers what technology exactly is making this revolution feasible. From the beginning the authors were aware that the use of this technology may run counter to basic moral and political values of the American society, and in consequence the revolution in military affairs would require a moral and political revolution to come first: ”In the pre-RMA days, psychological operations and psychological warfare were primitive. As they advanced into the electronic and bioelectronic era, it was necessary to rethink our ethical prohibitions on manipulating the minds of enemies (and potential enemies) both international and domestic... Through persistent efforts and very sophisticated domestic ”consciousness raising”, old-fashioned notions of personal privacy and national sovereignty changed.” Since it is difficult for them to imagine that the American society would accept the ethical and political revolution that would deprive the citizen of his privacy, they develop a scenario of events which would lead the American political leaders to back this revolution. The scenario is placed into the year 2000, and is based on the situation of growing terrorism, drug trafficking and criminality. In the document Rebuilding Americas Defenses, backed by the past U.S. government, we read: “To preserve American military preeminence in the coming decades, the Department of Defense must … seek to exploit the emerging revolution in military affairs … Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor” (ref. 13, pg. 51). Was it by accident that in 2001 a masive terrorist attack ocurred in the USA facilitated by questionable work of U.S. intelligence services and followed by anthrax attacks where the only indicted scientist, Bruce Ivins, did not have the technical means and scientific knowledge to turn the anthrax spores into a deadly aerosol which was used and that those two attacks were followed by an assault on privacy of U.S. Citizens and international law?
  The scenario goes on: “The president was thus amenable to the use of the sort of psychotechnology which formed the core of the RMA (revolution in military affairs) in conflict short of war ... As technology changed the way force was applied, things such as personal courage, face-to-face leadership, and the ‘warfighter’ mentality became irrelevant.” So the psychotechnology, which formed the core of the RMA, provided new methods for influencing the psyche of the adversary, in place of the classical strategy to make him fear his death. The book goes on: “Potential or possible supporters of the insurgency around the world were identified using the comprehensive Interagency Integrated Database. These were categorized as ‘potential’ or ‘active’, with sophisticated personality simulations used to develop, tailor and focus psychological campaigns for each. There is also potential for defensive psychotechnology such as ‘strategic personality simulations’ to aid national security decision makers.” (See Norman D. Livergood and Stephen D. Williams, “Strategic Personality Simulation: A New Strategic Concept”, unpublished draft paper, Carlisle Barracks, PAK: U.S. Army War College, 1994). In other words if there was, for example, a new Jesus Christ, U.S. agencies would simply engineer his personality to make sure he would not introduce any cultural changes. Once the strategy of computerized personality simulation is applied, the unfolding of human history will be totally controlled by elites having exclusive access to those technologies. The conclusion of the authors was: “Whether we opt for revolution or evolution, change will occur.”
  The concept of the “strategic personality stimulation” is probably tested on some of the people in the USA who claim to be mind control experiments victims, whose number, rapidly growing after 9/11 attacks, inspired the article in Washington Post, entitled “Mind Games” (31) in 2007. Cheryl Welsh, the director of the American organization Mind Justice (38) claims that she has received over 2500 complaints from U.S. citizens, that they fell victims to those experiments. Though some of those people may be mentally ill, many of them defend themselves in a rational way that suggests that they are mentally sound. A similar situation obtains in Russia. Russian politician Vladimir Lopatin admitted nonconcensual human-subject experiments had been conducted in Russia, when he wrote in the quoted book: “Compensation of damages and losses connected with social rehabilitation of persons suffering from destructive informational influence must be realized in legal trial…” (14). Growing numbers of complaints are coming as well from China and Japan (over 200).
  The European Parliament reacted to the installation of HAARP system by calling for “an international convention introducing a global ban on all developments and deployments of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings” (15, Paragraph 27). The body of the European Parliament STOA (Scientific and Technolgical Options Assessment) in the document “Crowd Control Technologies” (40) informed this resolution, originally proposed drafting of Paragraph 27 to say that the parliament called for “an international convention for a global ban on all research and development … which seeks to apply knowledge of the chemical, electrical, sound vibration or other functioning of the human brain to the development of weapons which might enable the manipulation of human beings, including a ban of any actual or possible deployment of such systems”. US Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich, the author of a Bill introduced into the US Congress in October 2001 proposing a ban on the deployment of “mind control” weapons, was quoted to assert that those weapons actually exist and “those people who control them are deadly serious and intend to use them, if we don't stop the weaponisation of space” (10).
  Electromagnetic technology enabling remote control of the functioning of human organism is subjected to National Security Information law in the USA (8) and all technologies enabling access to human brain are subject to the same law in the Russian Federation (9). Under such conditions, the mass media cannot fully disclose the existence and capacities of those technologies and world public cannot be engaged in favour of a ban on the use of such capabilities. The ownership of those capabilities gives opportunity to governments to use them against individuals (and eventually against masses), without giving them any access to any legal remedy. The concept of the world respecting freedom and human rights is fundamentally corrupted in this way. In November 2000 the Committee on Security of the Russian State Duma stated that capabilities enabling remote control of human nervous system or the remote infliction of health impairment are available to many modern governments (3). This was confirmed by the article from the U.S. army weekly Defense News stating that mind control technologies were used by the Israelis against the Palestinians (12).
  Evidently the secret arms race among the world governments may continue until the information war actually breaks out. V. Lopatin, in the book “Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia”, stated that psychotronic war is, as a matter of fact, “already taking place without declaration of war”. In this way the human world may sink into some kind of virtual reality where the independence of human thinking, feeling and decision making will be destroyed as a part of an “information war” or, in the worst case, into the reality where large masses of people will be killed, and unlike the aftermath of the deployment of nuclear weapons, the planet will still remain inhabitable for the survivors.
  With emerging energetic and climate crises and a presently-growing global economic crisis, either the next world war could erupt, or the means of remote manipulation of human brains and organisms could be applied to control dissatisfied citizens. Our elected democratic representatives are responsible for foreseeing the emerging crises and preventing them from happening by appropriate measures. However, they do not have mandate from citizens to allow those crises to happen, in order to create opportunities for them to experiment with attempts to solve the problems by use of technologies that allow them to manipulate their citizens’ minds. If this technology is once used against citizens it is questionable whether true democracy will ever be restored. The countries with the most advanced military technologies include the USA, which has never proposed any international initiative aimed at securing the ban of technologies enabling the remote control of human beings. According to the study “Crowd Control Technologies” published by the European Parliament’s STOA office, the USA are the major promoter of the use of those arms. (In fact, it was principally the efforts of the USA government to persuade this outcome that ensured the inclusion in NATO military doctrine of non-lethal technology.) The STOA states: “In October 1999 NATO announced a new policy on non-lethal weapons and their place in allied arsenals”; and “In 1996 non-lethal tools identified by the U.S. Army included… directed energy systems” and “radio frequency weapons” (40).
  According to the Russian government intelligence agency FAPSI, in the last 15 years, the U.S. expenses on the development and acquisition of the means of informational war grew four times and at the present time they occupy the first place among all military programs (17),(3). Though there are concepts of informational warfare other than the remote control of human beings, the unwillingnes of the USA to engage in the negotiations aimed at the ban of the manipulation of human brains suggests an intention to use those means in internal as well as in international affairs. If the USA achieve essential military preeminence in this area and if no global ban of the use of those technologies against civilians is negotiated, the USA may become a world totalitarian superpower of the new type.
  So far the only government who made a small step toward the ban of those technologies is the Russian Federation where the addendum to the article 6 of the Russian Federation law “On Weapons” was approved on July 26, 2001. It states: “within the territory of the Russian Federation is prohibited the circulation of weapons and other objects … the effects of the operation of which are based on the use of electromagnetic, light, thermal, infra-sonic or ultra-sonic radiations…”. Besides omitting the “psychotronic energy” The law does not provide any means for Russian citizens to defend themselves against the use of those weapons. Nor is there any compulsion upon the police or public health organizations to set up teams capable of detecting radiation that was enabling remote manipulation of human body and nervous system, or the source of such radiation. Nor does this law prohibit Russian government agencies from the use of such technology against their own citizens. In the USA alone, some of the federal states have enacted in their laws on firearms, new standards on electric and electromagnetic weapons (Michigan in 2003, Massachusetts in 2004, Maine in 2005). Sanctions go from 15 years in jail to life imprisonment, identically with weapons of mass destruction. As in Russia, those laws do not provide for the defense of citizens against the use of those weapons by government agencies.
  On February 25, 2009 Deputy Chief of General Staff of Russian Army, Anatoli Nogovicyn, stated that within 2 or 3 years a full fledged war in informational sphere, including “information-psychlogical influence on population and military units” may break out (39). So far politicians (especially in the USA) have not shown responsible intention to take action to stop this new arms race, which threatens to place human beings in a position subsidiary to machines and to destroy democracy. Humanitarian organizations apparently do not dare to challenge this National Security Information (on several occasions Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have refused to engage with this issue). Under such circumstances, it is left to citizens themselves to organize defense of their freedoms and elementary human rights, before those technologies are used, either at war or to suppress their dissatisfaction with governments who failed to prevent the emerging crises. They should coordinate their efforts internationally if they want to succeed.
• 

  ron June 18, 2009 at 10:39pm

  Every time money is appropriated to large military projects where does it go? Who follows it to make sure it goes correctly to where it was suppose to go or is to go? What if financial computer systems and money transfers were stolen by other countries using mind weapons?
  
  After 911 the only way to obtain a job in the City of Chicago was to have FBI security Clearence I was told. Otherwise you would not be allowed to work in the LOOP. I had FBI securtiy clearence to work in the Chicago Board of Trade for the year 2000 system upgrade as well as financial institutions. I worked at National Bank of Detroit after sept 11th 2001 in what was once First Chicago Bank and now is Chase Manhattan bank. My job was to put all the formulas from all the 401K benefits of the employees back in place because a temporary employee erased all of the financial data. This was before Christmas 2001. I was told by a vice president of the bank that all the employees of NBD were afraid to come to work after 911 and that they were all home getting assistance for stress disorders.
  
  I do believe now that Chicago was attacked and those bank employees of NBD were all directed energy victims.
  
  My boss the VP of the bank was working on a special project to secure Bank Data so it could be safe. She also told me that on 911 One world trade center backed up the other in terms of electronic data. All financial data was lost that day of 911.
  
  She was very worried about banks and financial information.
  
  I do not even know if those people are still alive.
  
  Outsourcing financial institutions to other countries was a very large mistake. Perhaps the financial institutions were influenced to do so via mind control and manipulation.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
• 

  ron May 21, 2009 at 9:02pm

  Fw: U.S. Preparing For War With Russia-Lt. Gen. Keith Alexander, also the Pentagon’s leading cyber warfare commander, said the U.S. is determined to lead the global effort to use computer technology to deter or defeat enemies….” [6]
  
  
  
  
  
  Subject: Fw: U.S. Preparing For War With Russia-Lt. Gen. Keith Alexander, also the Pentagon’s leading cyber warfare commander, said the U.S. is determined to lead the global effort to use computer technology to deter or defeat enemies….” [6]
  To: president@whitehouse.gov, comments@whitehouse.gov, mcmailteam@gmail.com, tijohnfinch@gmail.com, soleilmavis@yahoo.com, monika.stoces@gmail.com, dcr618@msn.com, defend_law@yahoo.ca, v911t@yahoogroups.com, AskDOJ@usdoj.gov, inspector.general@usdoj.gov, inquiries@un.org, info@kucinich.us, info@gp.org, info@aclu-nj.org, info@soaw.org, info@pdamerica.org, info@tutufoundation-usa.org, info@alternet.org, ACLUOnline@aclu.org, AllianceForJustice@afj.org, alw@peaceinspace.org, alerts@truemajority.org, alex@infowars.com, AlGore@algore.com, corpwatch@corpwatch.org, china@un.int, trice554@hotmail.com, xfile@uswest.net, CarolineLucas@GreenMEPs.org.uk, controlledamerica@yahoo.com, civi@europarl.eu.int, codepink@mail.democracyinaction.org, contact@veteransforcommonsense.org, beenydiane@yahoo.com, rize081476@yahoo.com, rrhodes@airamericaradio.com, publiccitizen@mail.democracyinaction.org, p.baird@surveillanceissues.com
  Cc: MCVictimsEU@yahoogroups.com, OTP.InformationDesk@icc-cpi.int, uk@un.int, usa@un.int, peru@un.int
  Date: Thursday, May 21, 2009, 7:43 AM
  
  
  http://www.daily.pk/world/americas/10183-us-preparing-for-war-with-...
  
  
  Subject: U.S. Preparing For War With Russia-Lt. Gen. Keith Alexander, also the Pentagon’s leading cyber warfare commander, said the U.S. is determined to lead the global effort to use computer technology to deter or defeat enemies….” [6]
  To:
  Date: Thursday, May 21, 2009, 7:32 AM
  
  “Lt. Gen. Keith Alexander, also the Pentagon’s leading cyber warfare commander, said the U.S. is determined to lead the global effort to use computer technology to deter or defeat enemies….” [6]
  
  Scalar Mind wars with directed energy and mind control weapons must end..
  
  The truth of the mind war weapons must be exposed
  
  http://mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profiles/blogs/from-tom-beardon
  
  http://www.cheniere.org/toc2.htm
  
  http://www.cheniere.org/images/weapons/index.html
  
  U.S. Preparing For War With Russia
  Written by www.daily.pk
  Monday, 18 May 2009 04:36
  “Today the situation is much more serious than before August 2008….[A] possible recurrence of war will not be limited to the Caucasus.
  
  “The new President of the United States did not bring about any crucial changes in relation to Georgia, but having a dominant role in NATO he still insists on Georgia’s soonest joining of
  the Alliance. If it happens, the world would face a more serious threat than the crises of the Cold War.
  
  
  Scalar Mind wars with directed energy and mind control weapons must end..
  
  The truth of the mind war weapons must be exposed
  
  http://mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profiles/blogs/from-tom-beardon
  
  http://www.cheniere.org/toc2.htm
  
  http://www.cheniere.org/images/weapons/index.html
  
  http://www.cheniere.org/images/weapons/index.html
  
  
  Weapons Slides
  
  SecDef Cohen
  
  
  
  "Others [terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves… So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations…It's real, and that's the reason why we have to intensify our [counterterrorism] efforts." *
  
  Secretary of Defense William Cohen at an April 1997 counterterrorism conference sponsored by former Senator Sam Nunn. Quoted from DoD News Briefing, Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, Q&A at the Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy, University of Georgia, Athens, Apr. 28, 1997.
  
  
  
  Slides
  (covers period up to 1999)
  
  * The Coming Strategic Attack on the United States
  
  * Outline
  
  * Loss of two separate A-10 Warthogs in 1997
  
  * Typical ABM Defenses (Widely Deployed by mid-70s)
  
  * Launch Phase Anti-Missile System
  
  * Launch Phase Anti-Bomber System
  
  * HC-130s Engines Quit, Aircraft Crashes
  Nov. 22, 1996
  
  * 1996 Actions by this analyst
  
  * Additional Information Exists: Not Analyzed, Not
  Integrated in Briefing
  
  * Kill of Arrow DC-8, Gander AFB, Dec. 12, 1985
  
  * Satellite Photos of Plumes in Soviet Arctic Since 1974
  See "Fer de Lance" for additional information
  
  * Aum Shinrikyo ("Supreme Truth" Cult), Shoko Asahara, Leader
  
  Aum Shinrikyo - Anatomy of a Dangerous Cult
  
  * Ashkhabad Problem and Its Solution
  
  * Strange Characteristics of Iran Quake, Sep. 1978
  
  * Iran Earthquake, September 1978
  
  * Situation Now (Assessment)
  
  * Situation Now (Assessment 2)
  
  * Aspects of Strong Local Asymmetry
  
  * Mass Casualty Problem: Aerial Anthrax Spray on Washington, D.C.
  
  * Present Status of the WMD Threat to the United States
  
  * Some Present Problems in the U.S. WMD Defense Capabilities
  
  * Internal Terrorist Threat with Weapons of Mass Destruction: Now & Future
  
  * Attempt to Ban Energetics Weapons Worldwide
  
  * Brezhnev's Schedule
  
  * Large glowing Tesla globe witnessed in Red China by hundreds
  
  * Cold Explosion -- 9 April 1984 Near Kurils, and formation and growth of spherical shell (globe)
  Sequence of Events
  
  * Cold Explosion -- 9 April 1984 Near Kurils, and formation and growth of spherical shell (globe)
  What They Were
  
  * Cold Explosion -- 9 April 1984 Near Kurils
  (Plus additional weapons effects)
  
  * Countering Insane MAD Systems:
  Find Loophole, Exploit It
  
  * Next Generation Counter to Both Sane and Insane MAD systems
  
  * Simultaneous Dudding of Nuclear Weapons Worldwide
  
  * Simultaneous Dudding of Nuclear Weapons Worldwide
  
  * Operation Divine Wind II
  
  * Advanced EMBW Applications
  
  * EM Biological Warfare (EMBW)
  
  * Microwave Radiation of U.S. Embassy in Moscow
  
  * Pentagon EMI Studies, 1989
  
  * EM Missile Practice (6 slides)
  
  --- On Thu, 5/21/09, Ron Angell wrote:
  
  http://www.daily.pk/world/americas/10183-us-preparing-for-war-with-...
  
  
  From: Ron Angell
  Subject: U.S. Preparing For War With Russia-Lt. Gen. Keith Alexander, also the Pentagon’s leading cyber warfare commander, said the U.S. is determined to lead the global effort to use computer technology to deter or defeat enemies….” [6]
  To:
  Date: Thursday, May 21, 2009, 7:32 AM
  
  “Lt. Gen. Keith Alexander, also the Pentagon’s leading cyber warfare commander, said the U.S. is determined to lead the global effort to use computer technology to deter or defeat enemies….” [6]
  
  U.S. Preparing For War With Russia
  Written by www.daily.pk
  Monday, 18 May 2009 04:36
  “Today the situation is much more serious than before August 2008….[A] possible recurrence of war will not be limited to the Caucasus.
  
  “The new President of the United States did not bring about any crucial changes in relation to Georgia, but having a dominant role in NATO he still insists on Georgia’s soonest joining of
  the Alliance. If it happens, the world would face a more serious threat than the crises of the Cold War.
  
  “Under the new realities, Georgia’s war against South Ossetia may easily turn into NATO’s war against Russia. This would be a third world war.” (Irina Kadzhaev, South Ossetia political scientist, South Ossetia Information Agency, April 2009
  
  On May 12 James Mattis, NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander Transformation [ACT] and commander of the U.S. Joint Forces Command, spoke at a three-day symposium called Joint Warfighting 09 in Norfolk, Virginia, where NATO’s Allied Command Transformation is based, and stated: “I come with a sense of urgency. The enemy is meeting like this as well.” [1]
  
  A local newspaper summarized his speech:
  
  “Mattis outlined a future in which wars will not have clearly defined beginnings and ends. What is needed, he said, is a grand strategy, a political framework that can guide military planning.” [2]
  
  He failed, for what passes for diplomatic reasons no doubt, to identify who “the enemy” is, but a series of recent developments, or rather an intensification of ongoing ones, indicate which nation it is.
  
  Last week the head of the U.S. Strategic Command, Gen. Kevin Chilton, told reporters during a Defense Writers Group breakfast on May 7 “that the White House retains the option to respond with physical force – potentially even using nuclear weapons – if a foreign entity conducts a disabling cyber attack against U.S. computer networks….”
  
  An account of his talk added “the general insisted that all strike options, including nuclear, would remain available to the commander in chief in defending the nation from cyber strikes.”
  
  Chilton “said he could not rule out the possibility of a military salvo against a nation like China, even though Beijing has nuclear arms,” [3] though the likely first target of alleged retaliation against equally alleged cyber attacks would be another nation already identified by US military officials as such: Russia.
  
  In late April and early May of 2007 the government of Estonia, which was inducted into NATO in 2004 and whose president was and remains Toomas Hendrik Ilves, born in Sweden and raised in the United States (where he worked for Radio Free Europe), reported attacks on websites in the country which were blamed on Russia.
  
  Over two years later no evidence has been presented to substantiate the claim that Russian hackers, much less the government itself, were behind the attacks, though it remains an article of faith among US and other Western officials and media that they were.
  
  The response from American authorities in the first place was so sudden and severe, even before investigations were conducted, as to strongly suggest that if the attacks hadn’t been staged they would need to be invented.
  
  Right afterward Secretary of the Air Force Michael W. Wynne stated, “Russia, our Cold War nemesis, seems to have been the first to engage in cyber warfare.”
  
  The US Air Force news source from which the above is quoted added that the events in Estonia days earlier “did start a series of debates within NATO and the EU about the definition of clear military action and it may be the first test of the applicability of Article V of the NATO charter regarding collective self-defense in the non-kinetic realm.” [4]
  
  NATO’s Article 5 is a collective military defense provision, in fact a war clause, one which first and to date for the only time has been used to support the protracted and escalating war in Afghanistan.
  
  References to it, then, are not to be taken lightly.
  
  On a visit to Estonia last November Pentagon chief Robert Gates met with the country’s prime minister, Andrus Ansip, and “discussed Russian behavior and new cooperation on cyber security….”
  
  It was reported that “Ansip said NATO will operate under the principle of Article 5 of the alliance’s treaty, which states that an attack on one ally is treated as an attack on all,” and “We are convinced that Estonia, as a member of NATO, will be very well defended.”[5]
  
  That the repeated mention of NATO’s Article 5 continued a year and a half after the alleged cyber attacks when none had occurred in the interim is revealing.
  
  At the beginning of this month the Pentagon announced that it was launching what it called a “digital warfare force for the future,” at Fort Meade in Maryland under the control of the U.S. Strategic Command, whose chief, Gen. Kevin Chilton, was quoted earlier as threatening the use of force up to and including nuclear weapons.
  
  The initiative was characterized in a news report as follows:
  
  “Lt. Gen. Keith Alexander, also the Pentagon’s leading cyber warfare commander, said the U.S. is determined to lead the global effort to use computer technology to deter or defeat enemies….” [6]
  
  
  
  The Pentagon is a synecdoche for the Department of Defense and everything related to its activities is cloaked in the same euphemism, so when pressed the US will insist its new cyber warfare project is intended for defensive purposes only. Any nation which and people who have been on the receiving end of US Defense Department actions know better. The new US cyber warfare command, its rationale based on a supposed Russian threat emanating from a non-military incident in the Baltics over two years ago, will be used to cripple the computer systems of any nation targeted for direct military assault, thus rendering them defenseless, and will be particularly effective for space-based and Star Wars (missile shield, interceptor missiles) first strike plans.
  
  On the same day the report of General Alexander’s pledge to “defeat enemies” appeared another news item reported that “A quasi-classified satellite that will serve as an engineering trailblazer for ballistic missile tracking technologies flew into space Tuesday [May 12].” [7]
  
  It was a Space Tracking and Surveillance System Advanced Technology Risk Reduction (STSS-ATRR) satellite, which “is part of a space-based system for the Missile Defense Agency.
  
  “Sensors aboard the STSS-ATRR satellite and on the ground will communicate with other systems to defend against incoming ballistic missiles.” [8]
  
  A few days earlier the California-based manufacturer Ducommun in a news report titled Ducommun Incorporated Announces Delivery of Nanosatellites to U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command announced that “its Miltec Corporation subsidiary delivered flight-ready nanosatellites to the U.S. Army pace and Missile Defense Command/Army Forces Strategic Command (USASMDC/ARSTRAT) in Huntsville, Alabama on April 28, 2009.”
  
  The delivery was “the completion of the first U.S. Army satellite development program since the Courier 1B communications satellite in 1960.”[9]
  
  Military satellites used for neutralizing the potential of a rival nation not so much to launch a first strike but to respond to one blur the distinction between so-called Son of Star Wars missile shield projects and full-fledged militarization of space.
  
  A recent Russian commentary saw it in just that manner:
  
  “Withdrawal from the 1972 ABM Treaty signified a switch to the testing and deployment of a global missile defense system, with a view to fully removing the deterrent potential of China, and partially that of Russia.
  
  “Washington [is] still trying to eliminate international legal restrictions on the formation of a system, which would theoretically make it invulnerable towards an act of retaliation, and even a launch-under-attack strike.” [10]
  
  Added to which is another “quasi-classified” subterfuge related to a prospective resumption of Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) talks between the US And Russia.
  
  American Assistant Secretary of State Rose Gottemoeller stated this week “that the US is not prepared to cut warheads removed from delivery means and kept in storage.” [11]
  
  So in addition to US plans to deploy ground-, sea-, air- and space-based anti-missile systems primarily around and against Russia (Poland, the Czech Republic, Norway, Britain, Japan and Alaska to date), the Pentagon will hold in reserve nuclear warheads for activation without a monitoring mechanism provided to Russian inspectors and arms reduction negotiators.
  
  On May 6 Euronews conducted an interview with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, who warned, “The way it [the US anti-ballistic missile shield] is designed has nothing to do with Iran’s nuclear program. It is aimed at Russian strategic forces, deployed in the European part of the Russian Federation.” [12]
  
  To add to the concerns of Russia and other nations, On April 30 the US established a Navy Air and Missile Defense Command (NAMDC) at the Naval Support Facility at Dahlgren, Virginia.
  
  “NAMDC is the lead organization for Navy, joint and combined Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD). NAMDC serves as the single warfare center of excellence to synchronize and integrate Navy efforts across the full spectrum of air and missile defense to include air defense, cruise missile defense and ballistic missile defense.” [13]
  
  The past two weeks has been a fertile period for stories in this vein and, to bring attention nearer the Earth, the US-based Strategy Page reported from a Russian source that “The United States has bought two Su-27 fighter jets from Ukraine” to “be used to train American military pilots, who may face opponents in them” and that the “US military will use them to test its radar and electronic warfare equipment.” [14]
  
  This was at the very moment that the US client in Ukraine, President Viktor Yushchenko, his national poll ratings plummeting to near 1%, signed a directive to prepare for full NATO membership and a few days after a US military delegation visited the country to inspect a tank unit and to plan “reforming the system of combat training….” [15]
  
  In terms of US training for warfare against the Russian Air Force, the Ukrainian development is only the latest in a number of such activities.
  
  Immediately following the nation becoming a full member of NATO, the US 81st Fighter Squadron flew to Constanta, Romania (in which nation the Pentagon has acquired four new bases since) to engage in combat training against Russian MiG-21s.
  
  According to one US pilot present, “It was pretty neat – you’re sitting in a MiG-21 that will be airborne with a MiG-21 pilot within days. This was an arm of the Soviet Union. These pilots were flying before the Soviet Union fell. They have quite a bit of perspective.” [16]
  
  In July of the next year the US 492nd Fighter Squadron was deployed to the Graf Ignatievo Air Base in neighoring Bulgaria to insure the opportunity for “Air Forces from multiple nations to learn about each other’s aircraft tactics and capabilities.
  
  “The pilots of the F-15E Strike Eagles and the MIG-29s and MIG-21s are sharing knowledge of aircraft and tactics as the exercise wraps up its first week of training.”
  
  A US Air Force colonel was quoted as saying, “Only two of the 38 aircrew members have had a chance to fly against MIGs. By the time the exercise is over, everyone will have had a chance to either fly in a MIG or fly against one.” [17]
  
  A month afterward the US Air Force 22nd Expeditionary Fighter Squadron arrived in Romania for the Viper Lance exercises which “marked the first time U.S. F-16 pilots have trained in Romania” and “where “MiG-21 and F-16 pilots [flew] integrated formations to conduct basic fighter maneuvers, dissimilar air combat training and air-to-ground strike missions….” [18]
  
  This time the quote is from an F-16 Fighting Falcon pilot:
  
  “My flight in the backseat of a Lancer [MiG-21] is a good opportunity to look at different aircraft and it’s a real privilege and an honor. I want to see what they see from their cockpit, and view a new angle of understanding against our adversaries.” [19]
  
  Two weeks ago a US Air Force fighter squadron flew to the Bezmer Air Base in Bulgaria where an American airman said, “This is the first time a USAFE [United States Air Forces in Europe] fighter squadron has deployed to this location….The most rewarding part of this experience is knowing that I am helping the pilots train for war.” [20]
  
  To prepare the US for air combat against the full range of Russian military aircraft, India was invited to the annual Red Flag air combat exercises in Alaska in 2007, war games “meant to train pilots from the US, NATO and other allied countries for real combat situations.
  
  “This includes the use of ‘enemy’ hardware and live ammunition for bombing exercises.” [21]
  
  India provided six Sukhoi SU-30MKI fighters which were “particularly interesting to the exercise as [they are] Russian-made, thus
  traditionally considered ‘hostile.’” [22]
  
  May 1st, on the occasion of the Czech Republic taking over the six-month NATO air patrol rotation in the Baltic skies over Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania – five minutes flight from Russia’s second largest city of St. Petersburg – a Czech official boasted “The area we are protecting is about three times larger than that of the Czech Republic. This is a NATO outpost.”
  
  Lithuanian Air Force Commander Arturas Leita announced that “the Baltic countries would probably ask for the prolongation of the air force mission within NATO until 2018.” [23]
  
  From June 8-16 Sweden will host a NATO drill, Loyal Arrow, described as “biggest air force drill ever in the Finnish-Swedish Bothnian Bay,” [24], also not far from St. Petersburg, with a British aircraft carrier and more than 50 fighter jets participating.
  
  That exercise will begin exactly a week after the US-led NATO Cooperative Lancer 09 war games end in Georgia on Russia’s southern flank.
  
  In speaking of the dangers of the last-named but with equal application to all that has preceded it, the South Ossetian Ministry for Press and Mass Media website recently quoted political scientist Irina Kadzhaev as warning:
  
  “Today the situation is much more serious than before August 2008. The then threat endangered only South Ossetia and Abkhazia, but after Russia’s recognition of these states’ independence and the conclusion of agreements envisaging the presence of Russian armed forces on their territories, a possible recurrence of war will not be limited to the Caucasus.
  
  “The new President of the United States did not bring about any crucial changes in relation to Georgia, but having a dominant role in NATO he still insists on Georgia’s soonest joining of the Alliance. If it happens, the world would face a more serious threat than the crises of the Cold War.
  
  “Under the new realities, Georgia’s war against South Ossetia may easily turn into NATO’s war against Russia. This would be a third world war.”
• 

  ron March 27, 2009 at 11:11pm

  Full Body MRI's need to be done to every politician worldwide- especially US politicians to disable RFID implants and nanotech implants that have comprimised the world.
  
  The operator of the MRI must not switch off the power as it approaches the implant and the machine must not be controlled remotely to have it switched off. There needs to be a monitor of the MRI operator- Perhaps international human rights activists and human rights activists.
  
  All civilians need to have an MRI to disable implants both nano tech and conventional RFID
  
  Cheney and Bush are guiltiy of attempting to control the world via a horrible weapon invented as early as 1903 by the Russians and perfected in 1934 to brainwash people and make them do things they normally would not do- "Thou shall not kill"
  
  
  

  http://mcvictimsworld.ning.com/forum/attachment/download?id=2301601...

  The link above is a conf call that provides very useful solutions to solving some of the problems of directed energy. VIP.. share this with veterans.. as it well help them free themselves from control after returning home from Iraq.. spread this far and wide- PLEASE Shielding technologies and strategies to lessen and stop directed energy. Freedom fighters for America and Manhattan Project Backstep Radio Show. I am on this show and there is a lot of thing our US Politicians need to do to protect themselves against directed energy weapons. Please listen to the entire show- 98 minutes and downloat the 38 MB file discussed very useful shielding technologies from a company that makes shielding for the medical industry. http://mcvictimsworld.ning.com/forum/attachment/download?id=2301601... the link above is a conf call that provides very useful solutions to solving some of the problems of directed energy. The US corporation that provides shielding to the private companies as well as the DoD can also shield our politicians and protect them from harm so they can make the proper decisions that represent "We the People" http://www.ramayes.com

  
  "Geheimes Ruland. Moskau -- Die Zombies der roten Zaren" "Secret Russia. Moscow -- The zombies of the red czars"]
  
  http://www.raven1.net/russvid.htm Russian Scientist Igor Smirnov Describes Russian Psychotronic Technology ZDF German TV Documentary December 22, 1998. When Reagan asked Gorbachev to "Bring down that wall" the worst escaped to the Western world to spread Communism/Fascism. http://www.raven1.net/russvid.htm China and Russia have been ahead of the USA in the torture Industry always. Remember Russia was in Afghanastan for 30 years prior to the USA. The diamond in Afghanastan are the size of softballs and when the hills were being blown diamonds were being mined by US missles and strikes. There are 6 Countries that mine the wealth of Afghanastan. Where is that going? Is the US fighting a war for Communism/Fascism? The USA has no purpose to be in the middle east other that to clear the way for Russia. It is obvious that the USA has been taken over by Russia and that the politicians need to educate themselves as to the degree of influence that is going on and the tricks playes by the Russians to comprimise politicians. They all need to THINK and get a full body MRI to disable their implants.
  
  
  The USA and Russia NEVER should have done joint space missions- BIg Mistake
  
  
• 

  ron February 25, 2009 at 8:29am

  
  
  Dave.. the money has been stolen by what is called The Belgian Electronic Accounting Service Terminal
  
  Above is a picture of where the Supercomputer that tortures and controls the world is located. It is called "Lilith" and is in Belgium in the Common Market. It must be unplugged and dismantled. UN inspectors need to be allowed in and make sure it is turned off and dismantled in order to comply with Article 1 of the 1975 Declaration against torture.
  
  
  
  http://www.alberto.pl/bruksela.php
  Brussels Elekronical Accounting Surveying Terminal (Lilith or BEAST)
  
  
  
  
  http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Dr.+Hanrick+Eldeman+homela...
  
  
  
  
  
  Above is a picture of where the Supercomputer that tortures and controls the world is located. It is called "Lilith" and is in Belgium in the Common Market. It must be unplugged and dismantled. UN inspectors need to be allowed in and make sure it is turned off and dismantled in order to comply with Article 1 of the 1975 Declaration against torture.
  
  
  
  Dr. Hanrick Eldeman will be guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity unless he allows it to be turned off.
  Dr. Hanrick Eldeman, Chief Analyst of the Common Market Confederacy in Brussels, has revealed that a computerized restoration plan is already under way to straighten out world chaos. A crisis meeting in early 1974 brought together Common Market leaders, advisers and scientists at which time Dr. Eldeman unveiled "the Beast". They named it Lilith
  
  
  
  
  Lilith is a gigantic three story computer located in the administrative building of the headquarters of the Common Market.
  
  
  
  That monster is a self-programming computer that has more than one hundred sources distributing entries. Experts in programming have perfected a plan that will handle by computer all of the world's trade.
  
  
  
  
  This master plan would imply a system of digital enumeration of each human being of the earth. Thus the computer would give each inhabitant of the world a number to be used for each purchase or sale, removing the problem of present credit cards. This number would be invisibly tatooed by laser, either on the forehead or on the back of the hand. This would establish a walking credit card system. And the number could be seen only through infrared scanners, installed in special verification counters or in business places.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Dr.Eldeman pointed out that by using three entries of six digits each, every inhabitant of the world would be given a distinct credit card number.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  EVIDENCE OF THE TORTURE DONE TO THE WORLD
  
  www.mindcontrolforums.com/v/intro3.htm&035;wells
  
  http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/v/intro3.htm&035;wells
  
  http://www.luxefaire.com/devilvision/tableofcontents.html
• 

  ron February 24, 2009 at 5:04am

  http://www.carnicom.com
  
  Morgellons form in the human body from Chemtrails. The US military/NATO/DoD is responsible for massive torture/Murder
  
  
  
  
• 

  ron February 24, 2009 at 1:18am

  The mind control /Toruture is directly proportional to Chemtrails from NATO. NATO has been taken over since 2003 and the United Nations has been taken over since 2005 by corporations.
  
  http://www.carnicom.com shows the chemtrails.
  
  Morgellons are nano crystals that grow inside the human body and on the nervous system to create a human 2 way radio that is then controlled by massive Supercomputers to make people do things they noramally would not do. The antidote is massive shifts in your body PH via eating foods that are either very acidic or very basic.. one way then the other.. shift one way then the other in food intake. No water is untainted.. no processed food is untainted now with morgellons
  
  http://www.google.de/search?hl=de&q=morgellons+disease&btnG...
• 

  ron February 23, 2009 at 1:41am

  "Penates Dumps Bodies"
  
  
  
  
  Please note this truck is by where the human incinerators are in fort myers near buckingham road next to gulf coast mental institution.. where reports of over 500 children suicides took place.. some of these children were sold off into sex slavery.. some were murdered.. some are still in the USA kept as slaves
  
  "Penates Dumps Bodies"
  
  that is what the mud flap says.. Fort Myers Florida