Mind-reading gadget predicts what you want to say before you say it

[deca]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-7301765/Mind-readin...

• Experts scanned participants' brains as they listened to and answered questions
• They used this to create a decoder that can interpret speech from brain activity
• Both heard and actively produced speech can be decoded from cortical scans
• The device could one day help people who cannot speak due to illness or injury 

A new mind reading gadget can interpret brain activity and predict what you want to say before you've even uttered a word — and even produce a transcript in real time.

Researchers used brain scans of people listening to and then answering questions to develop a system to decode speech from the corresponding brain activity.

Dubbed the neural decoder, once refined it could be used by people who cannot speak or their own due to illness or injury.

video on link

[deca]

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-10994-4

[ghstdtnee]

• Subdural radiation penetration of the head
• (bci by force) by brainwave monitoring by force
• Audible Voice to text
• diplomats subjected to same incl psyops
• aka HUMAN rights/ telecommunications fraud
• not difficult to figure out
• Conducted by sex predators in UK   By Name

[ghstdtnee]

• If the ipt doesn't respond, info given to public in UK to prove
• Criminal fraud
• Facilitation 

[Anna Biondi]

This coming November will be eight years that I have been tortured in the most horrible way, and the worst thing, no one believes me, except, perhaps a friend and a sister.  The  medical system refuses categorically to accept it. I know it because I tried very hard to convince doctors that I was saying the truth.  I am a grandma, and my situation may be a little different than usual.  The torture diminished for a while; now they are being cruel again.  It seems to me that there is nothing that can be done.

[Hans Zoff]

Why not tell the truth? “To do so, however, it will need to be proven that the same principle can be applied to decode answers from purely imagined — rather than actually produced — speech.” So, this is NOT ‘reading abstract thoughts’, or anything even close to it. Always with the ‘someday soon researchers hope to be able to back up Cointelpro’s lies that thoughts can be read by machines’. This is why so many TI’s have heard of  “ex-NSA agent” John St. Clair Akwei’s ‘remote neural monitoring lawsuit’, but nobody realizes that the case was thrown out of court as clear fraudulence:

https://exposinginfragard.blogspot.com/2012/11/evidence-of-remote-n...

[deca]

clearly you don`t understand neuro weapons/tech  ....

not this Anthony Forwood crap again ... they guy not even a TI...

http://exposinginfragard.blogspot.com/2014/06/a-primer-on-v2k-vs-mi...

" Although I’ve never knowingly been the target by any similar sort of electronic weapons myself (other than the usual mass media),"

again this is website looks like a JTRIG fake one

https://theintercept.com/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/

"Among the core self-identified purposes of JTRIG are two tactics: (1) to inject all sorts of false material onto the internet in order to destroy the reputation of its targets; and (2) to use social sciences and other techniques to manipulate online discourse and activism to generate outcomes it considers desirable. To see how extremist these programs are, just consider the tactics they boast of using to achieve those ends: “false flag operations” (posting material to the internet and falsely attributing it to someone else), fake victim blog posts (pretending to be a victim of the individual whose reputation they want to destroy), and posting “negative information” on various forums. Here is one illustrative list of tactics from the latest GCHQ document we’re publishing today:"

Hans Zoff said:

Why not tell the truth? “To do so, however, it will need to be proven that the same principle can be applied to decode answers from purely imagined — rather than actually produced — speech.” So, this is NOT ‘reading abstract thoughts’, or anything even close to it. Always with the ‘someday soon researchers hope to be able to back up Cointelpro’s lies that thoughts can be read by machines’. This is why so many TI’s have heard of  “ex-NSA agent” John St. Clair Akwei’s ‘remote neural monitoring lawsuit’, but nobody realizes that the case was thrown out of court as clear fraudulence:

https://exposinginfragard.blogspot.com/2012/11/evidence-of-remote-n...