deca's Posts (70)

Sort by

http://sputniknews.com/us/20160206/1034319282/darpa-neural-microship-eyeriss.html#ixzz3zMiGJvTj

DARPA, the Pentagon’s cutting-edge science division, is developing a neural network to enhance “deep learning” on the battlefield.

Modern warfare requires more than simple brute strength. The Information Age has revealed new ways to communicate and access information, and these new rules have also affected the way wars are fought and won.

Imagery gathered by satellites and drones must make its way to units on the ground for data analyzation. While a drone can take a photograph, it cannot tell you what it’s looking at, or what to do about it, if anything. A human brain is necessary to spot a terrorist stronghold, or to recognize that a missile launcher in one photo has been moved, when compared with an older photo.

"Full exploitation of this information is a major challenge," officials with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) wrote in a 2009 brief on "deep learning."

"Human observation and analysis of [intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance] assets is essential, but the training of humans is both expensive and time-consuming. Human performance also varies due to individuals’ capabilities and training, fatigue, boredom, and human attentional capacity."

Working with a team of researchers at MIT, DARPA is hoping to take all of that human know-how and shrink it down into processing unit no bigger than your cellphone, using a microchip known as "Eyeriss." The concept relies on "neural networks;" computerized memory networks based on the workings of the human brain.

A palm-sized neural network chip could be installed in drones or satellites, allowing these units to conduct their own learning in real time, without the need for human analysis.

Instead of a team of individuals combing through imagery looking for a single target, a drone could simply alert soldiers on the ground once the drone has identified a target.

The technology could also work in disaster zones, allowing drones to spot and identify people in need, and then communicate location and other data to aid workers.

Current deep learning technology requires a large number of servers and the energy necessary to run those computers. Data can be sent to warehouses containing the computers for analyzation, but that requires an Internet connection, which isn’t always readily available in combat situations and, when it is, is not always secure.

But Eyeriss could change the way the game of war is played. Packing more processing power into a much smaller space, the microchip could allow our handheld devices to become even smaller, and allow drones and satellites to operate without a need for massive server warehouses or hundreds of human analysts.

Read more…

“American Ultra”: Another Attempt at Making MKULTRA Cool

71

The movie American Ultra is based on the real life CIA project MKULTRA, which aims to create mind controlled slaves. While this premise is horrific, the movie nevertheless portrays the CIA and mind control as something that is cool and even “rebellious”. It is yet another attempt at making mind control cool by mass media.

Warning: Colossal spoilers ahead!

American Ultra is an odd movie. While the story revolves around the horrific experiments the CIA conducts on its own population, it is told in a humorous matter, turning the whole subject into a joke. Not only that, the movie portrays CIA mind control as something that is cool and edgy – although it is the exact opposite of all of these things.

Take a look at the movie poster above: An MK slave and a CIA handler wearing cool shades, holding weapons and looking bad-ass. Is there anything LESS rebellious than a slave who has completely lost their free will and a CIA handler? They’re both pawns of the elite’s system. This is another case of media double-speak and, if you’ve been reading Vigilant Citizen, you know that making mind control cool and acceptable is an important part of the Agenda. Before we look at the movie, let’s look at what it is based on.

MKULTRA

Project MKULTRA  – the CIA’s mind control program – was the code name given to an illegal program of experiments on human subjects. Although the program is officially said to have been halted, some whistleblowers claim that the program secretly carried on using other names such as Monarch Mind control (read my article about it here).

Declassified picture of a young MK-ULTRA subject, 1961. The caption says: "Unidentified White female between the age of 8 and 10 years old. Subject underwent 6 months of treatment using heavy doses of LSD, electroshock and sensory deprivation. Experiments under codename: MKULTRA about early 60s. Subject's memory was erased and her brain is that of a newborn baby."

Declassified picture of a young MK-ULTRA subject, 1961. The caption says: “Unidentified White female between the age of 8 and 10 years old. Subject underwent 6 months of treatment using heavy doses of LSD, electroshock and sensory deprivation. Experiments under codename: MKULTRA about early 60s. Subject’s memory was erased and her brain is that of a newborn baby.”

As you can see, CIA mind control is not cool at all. In fact, it is one of the most devious, horrific programs ever conceived. Based on sexual abuse, trauma, torture, confinement, intoxication, hypnotism, brainwashing and other devious methods, mind control literally destroys the life of the slave at the hands of cold, heartless sadistic handlers. The slaves are then programmed to perform various tasks such as becoming sex slaves, drug mules or, like in the case of American Ultra, trained killers. In Monarch mind control terms, “killer programming” is referred to as Delta Programming.

DELTA is known as “killer” programming and was originally developed for training special agents or elite soldiers (i.e. Delta Force, First Earth Battalion, Mossad, etc.) in covert operations. Optimal adrenal output and controlled aggression is evident. Subjects are devoid of fear and very systematic in carrying out their assignment. Self-destruct or suicide instructions are layered in at this level.
– Ron Patton, Project Monarch

Delta slaves are “asleep” until they are “activated” by a trigger – usually a series of words or images.

The Delta’s are alters trained to carry out special missions resulting in death. The Delta’s who are inactive are asleep. They must be activated. The programming to activate them will be triggered if a mission is given or if certain parts of the deeper parts of the system are tampered with.
– Fritz Springmeier, The Illuminati Formula to Create a Mind Control Slave

Products of that program become literal killing machines, trained in various forms of combat and some even develop extra-sensory perception (ESP).

Deltas will be trained in hand to hand combat–and know certain vulnerable places to kill people including breaking the neck. Training included a great deal of weapons training.
– Ibid.

Although the repercussions of their actions are very real, slaves are not able to distinguish reality from fiction.

Their thinking is buried in fairy tales. They are programmed to see themselves in fairy tales, they are programmed not to see their handlers or anybody’s else’s face for that matter. These alters do not have a chance to understand what they are doing.
– Ibid.

Finally, if these slaves become problematic, the only solution for them is death.

If the programmers get tired of the slave’s programming breaking down– and it does in part due to the severe abuse they get from these sadistic programmers/handlers, then they will simply give the slave an assignment in which the slave will end up dying, i.e. a suicide mission.
– Ibid.

Therefore, although it is not actually mentioned, the “hero” of American Ultra is an MK slave whose “superpowers” are the result of trauma and abuse. He displays all of the characteristics described above, but everything is showcased in a fun, entertaining, and glorified matter. In short, the CIA is trying to sell you on their most disgusting program.

Although Delta programming is horrific and is used to carry on political assassinations and even mass shootings (yes, you’ve read that right), American Ultra turns it into a fun, quirky, teenage-stoner-friendly thing.

Let’s look at the movie.

American Ultra

The hero of the movie is Mike Howell (played by Jesse Eisenberg), a stereotypical stoner who is prone to panic attacks. He lives with his girlfriend Phoebe Larson (played by Kristen Stewart), whom he wants to marry more than anything else in the world. Later in the movie, we learn that she is his MKULTRA handler, when she clearly announces to him:

“I’m your handler.”

Not yet aware of this fact, Mike is madly in love with Phoebe and wants to propose to her. His love for his girlfriend is a little obsessive, almost as if he was … programmed to love his handler.

A couple of times during the movie, Mike stares at the ring he wants to give his girlfriend and zones out.

A couple of times during the movie, Mike stares at the ring he wants to give his girlfriend and zones out. The first time we does this, he burns the omelets he was cooking.

In one shot, we see the couple laying togheter with their feet displaying a matching tattoo ... of an eye. Although this appears to be a romantic thing, when we learn about the slave/handler relationship, the "all-seeing eye" tattoo takes on a disturbing meaning.

In one shot, we see the couple’s matching tattoo. Unsurprisingly enough, it’s an all-seeing eye. Although this appears to be a romantic thing, it represents the slave/handler relation between the two.

Controlled by the Government

Mike wants to take his girlfriend on a trip, but his programming doesn’t allow him to do so.

At the airport, Mike gets a heavy panic attack, making him physically unable to board the plane.

At the airport, Mike gets a heavy panic attack, making him physically unable to board the plane.

We later learn the this “panic attack” was actually MKULTRA programming rendering him unable to skip town. On his way back home, we realize that Mike is being monitored by state authorities.

Mike and Phoebe get stopped by a police officer who knows them very well. Mike cannot escape the all seeing eye of the elite.

Mike and Phoebe get stopped by a police officer who knows them very well. In fact, he even asks Mike if he’s had “one of his episodes”. Mike cannot escape the all-seeing eye of the elite.

Mike’s main escape from his day-to-day routine (which is all setup for him by the CIA) is drawing comics.

Mike created Apollo Ape, an "astronaut monkey who goes on adventures".

Mike created Apollo Ape, an “astronaut monkey who goes on adventures”.

Although Mike is “asleep”, his Delta alter is subconsciously reflected in Apollo Ape’s violent adventures. As stated above, when MK slaves are triggered, things turn into a surreal fairy tale. Mike’s comic reflects his distorted recollection of when he was triggered.

Although he has not been triggered for years, Mike is nevertheless under constant surveillance by the CIA.

Mike is constantly monitored by spy satellites.

Mike is constantly monitored by spy satellites.

While all of these point towards oppressive police-state nightmare, the movie serves the viewers, a fun, PG-13 version of the CIA.

The CIA is Cool

Want to make the CIA as friendly and nonthreatening as possible?  Use the girl that played in Twilight as a mind-control handler and use Eric Foreman from That 70’s Show as an MKULTRA program director.

Newly promoted CIA agent Adrian Yates wants to kill Mike using his own MK slaves. He is also very sassy.

Newly promoted CIA agent Adrian Yates wants to kill Mike using other MK slaves because he keeps wanting to skip town. Also, he is very sassy.

Another extra-non-threatning CIA agent is this guy we keep seeing. In this scene, he is sending a frowny-face selphie to his boyfriend because he wants to be at home with him. Aaaaw :(

Another extra-non-threatening CIA agent is this guy we keep seeing. Here, he is sending a frowny-face selfie to his boyfriend because he wants to be at home with him and their little doggy. Aaaaw :(

The other main representative of the CIA is Victoria Lasseter, who was in charge of Mike’s ULTRA program. Although she was responsible for completely destroying and rebuilding Mike’s brain using traumatic techniques, she is portrayed as some kind of caring mother figure.

In this scene, Lasseter tells Mike the code words that will trigger his Delta alter persona - unlocking his cool superhero powers.

In this scene, Lasseter tells Mike the words that trigger his Delta alter persona – unlocking his cool superhero powers and enabling him to kick ass. Mind control is so cool. I wish I was a mind control slave (not).

Later in the movie, when Mike encounter Lasseter again, he asks her:

“Are you my mother?”

This sentence is rather sad. Since Lasseter erased his memory and literally created a new persona, Mike instinctively believes that this CIA agent is his mother.

She then goes into a rant explaining why he is a special snowflake and why she cares about him.

– Do you remember when you were arrested when you were 18 for the acid? That was when we first met. I was recruiting people for a program called Wisemen, which was basically designed to take third strike misdemeanor offenders and offer them the opportunity to volunteer … to be an experiment.

– That was a mistake.

– No Mike, you worked. All the other subjects that came in, they were failures. But not you. You were a success. But it was driving you insane.

– So you erased my memories and you f*cked with my head. And you left me with a fake girlfriend.

– I don’t want you to die. Because I care about you, alright?

The mother-figure aspect of Lasseter refers to an important figure in real life Monarch programming:  The “Grand Dame” or “Mother-Of-Darkness”.

An Illuminati Grande Dame will assist the programmers to insure that the proper script is given to the child and that a psychotic break doesn’t occur causing the victim to lose their mind.

The Mothers of Darkness alters are an important balancing point to prevent the sadistic male programmers from killing more of the children they are working on.
– Ibid.

Therefore, although she’s a “good guy” in the movie, she represents the Grand Dame in Monarch programming, a “mother figure” who exists simply to make sure that the MK slaves do not completely break down – not because they love them.

The other CIA figure in the movie is Mike’s handler (and girlfriend) Phoebe. Although MK handlers are usually sadistic, inhumane, MK slaves themselves, the movie portrays the handler as a cute young girl.

In a quick flashback, Mike recalls his "girlfriend" interviewing him as a CIA agent.

In a quick flashback, Mike recalls his “girlfriend” interviewing him as a CIA agent.

In short, the entire CIA and the MKULTRA program are sanitized and represented by friendly people. Also, the many illegal, anti-democratic, freedom-impeding, police-state tactics of the agency are portrayed as if they were almost normal – just everyday business.

Yates uses a truck load of Mind control slaves to go out and kill Mike,

Yates orders a truck full of Mind control slaves to go out and kill Mike

A fake story is planted in the news to justify the man hunt against Mike and Lasseter.

A fake story is planted in the news to justify the manhunt against Mike and Lasseter.

FEMA equipment is used to impose martial law in Mike's city.

FEMA equipment is used to impose martial law in Mike’s city.

A remote-controlled drone is sent to bomb Mike's house.

A remote-controlled drone is sent to bomb Mike’s house.

Despite all of these tactics, Yates fails at catching Mike. The outcome? He gets excecuted in the woods by his superior. That is how you deal with people in MK ULTRA. The life of lasseter is spared because she convinces him that Mike is a great assett and should be used by the CIA instead of being killed.

Despite all of these tactics, Yates fails at catching Mike. The outcome? He gets executed in the woods by his superior. Just CIA, MKULTRA business.

The life of Lasseter is spared because she convinces her boss that Mike is a great asset that should be used by the CIA instead of being killed.

Mind Control is Cool

As soon as Mike is triggered by his Mother-of-Darkness, he turns into a whiny superhero who is able to use any common object as a weapon. While his new-found powers confuse Mike, he eventually embraces them. During his adventures, he tells Phoebe stuff like:

“I remember every single thing that happened in the last 94 minutes.”

“What if I’m like a robot? With gigabytes of memory recall and, like, Karate programming where I use objects to kill people?”

“Do you know what a M1 Abrams is? Its a type of tank. I could like 50 types of tanks right now.”

At one point Phoebe asks him if he feels sick. He looks in the mirror, and tells her:

“No, I feel kind of amazing”.

In a funky, cool, club-like setting, Mike says that he feels kind of amazing. He then weridly smiles.

In a funky, cool, club-like setting, Mike says that he “feels kind of amazing”. He then weirdly smiles.  Being a mind controlled slaved programmed to kill people feels “kind of amazing”. That is what Hollywood is telling youth right now.

Mike ultimately kills everybody in his path in a variety of hilarious ways (killing people is also very cool). He is however clearly completely “out of it”.

He proposes to his girldriend (handler) in front of a bunch of cops pointing their guns at them.

After winning everything, Mike proposes to his girlfriend (handler) in front of a bunch of cops pointing their guns at them.

They then both get tasered. Police oppression is so romantic.

They then both get tasered because they’re not cool, rebellious youngsters, they’re pawns of an oppressive system.

The CIA concludes that Mike is still usable. At the end of the movie, Mike and Phoebe are both in a posh hotel in the Philippines, look nice and classy.

We quickly realize that they are both on a CIA mission and that Mike is sent to kill people. The only possible end for an MK slave is death.

We quickly realize that they are both on a CIA mission and that Mike is sent to kill people. He is still an MK slave and his “wife” is still his handler.

In the final scene of the movie, Mike faces an Asian mob boss. The movie then turns into a cartoon.

Mike turns into Apollo Ape who kills everybody in sight.

Mike turns into Apollo Ape who kills everybody in sight.

While most viewers will say: “Wow, the movie ended in such a cool and creative way”, this cartoon ending implies one important thing: Mike is a triggered MK slave in a dissociative state. When triggered, he cannot perceive the difference between reality and fiction. In short, despite the “happy ending”, Mike still has absolutely no control over his actions and is still nothing but a CIA asset.

In Conclusion

American Ultra is based on the real-life program MKULTRA program, which sought to turn unwilling civilians into mind-control slaves. Although mind control uses the most atrocious torture techniques known in history and indulges in the ungodly task of turning a human being into a mindless slave, American Ultra sanitizes the entire process. It avoids most of the horrific stuff while focusing on the fun, superhero killing stuff. Kids love that. While some viewers might think that the movie ended well and that the “good guys” won, the reality is that they’ve witnessed an odd infomercial for mind control.

American Ultra is yet another attempt by mass media at making mind control a cool, glamorous and, yes, even a rebellious thing. But what do you expect? If the CIA has no issues in brainwashing Americans into a state of mental slavery, do you think they have issues with attempting to brainwash the public with their subversive messages? MKULTRA is about brainwashing individuals, American Ultra is about brainwashing the American public.

http://vigilantcitizen.com/moviesandtv/american-ultra-another-strange-attempt-at-making-mkultra-cool/

Read more…

Researchers have successfully tested a technique that could potentially allow a computer to decode the thought process of the human mind.

Researchers have successfully tested a technique that could potentially allow a computer to decode the thought process of the human mind.

A team of scientists from the University of Washington (WU) developed a method that could potentially be applied to paralyzed people to establish a form of mind-reading communication.

Results of the recent experiments intimate that, with the use of brain implants and special software, computers could be able to convert information from brain signals to accurately determine what images a person sees at a particular moment, in real time.

Seven patients with severe epilepsy took part in an experiment led by neuroscientist Rajesh Rao and neurosurgeon Jeff Ojermann, alongside a team of scientists from WU. The patients had electrodes temporarily implanted into their temporal lobes so that doctors could observe the focal point of a seizure.

During the experiment the subjects were exposed to a certain visual information. They were told to look for an image of an upside-down house in a set of photos flickering on computer monitors in brief 400 millisecond intervals, a random combination of images from pictures of human faces and houses to blank gray screens. Meanwhile, machines were detecting the electrical activity of the brain via electrodes connected to sophisticated software.

The program sampled and digitized the incoming brain signals at a rate of 1,000 times per second to determine which combination of electrode locations and signals correlated best to what the patients were seeing. It turned out that different neurons fired when people were looking at faces versus when they were looking at houses, the researchers reported.

"We got different responses from different (electrode) locations; some were sensitive to faces and some were sensitive to houses," Rao said.

Later the patients watched a different set of pictures, but self-learning software allowed the computer to determine, with 96 percent accuracy and at nearly the speed of perception, if the patient was seeing a house, a face, or a grey screen.

Further study, beyond the document published on January 21 in the journal PLOS Computational Biology, is still required to see if the system would be able to learn a more diverse set of images and recognize the difference, for instance, between human face or the face of a dog.

Following the expected improvements, the technology could break the boundary between machines and humanity.    

Read more…

Draft Investigatory Powers Bill Select Committee
[url]http://parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/ac0e244b-5748-4348-97c2-0e7f2bcdfd6c[/url]

[QUOTE]
    14:15:50
    Subject: Draft Investigatory Powers Bill
    14:15:51
    Witnesses: Christopher Graham, Information Commissioner
    14:57:21
    Witnesses: Jesper Lund, Chairman, IT-Political Association of Denmark, and William E. Binney, formerly Technical Director of the United States National Security Agency
    16:10:56
    Witnesses: Sir Bruce Robertson, New Zealand Commissioner of Security Warrants (via video link)
[/QUOTE]



again do the people in government think we are stupid and naive ?

clearly the reason to have a bulk collection of peoples communication information/activity is for behavior and social/political  control ...and nothing to do with catching pedo`s, terrorist and serious criminals ...
again look at the jimmy savile and other case of child abuse were the authority's ignored and lost victims cases and never prosecuted them   

clearly they are trying to make the bulk collection appear legal and justified to get it established ...then when that's done ....there will be government agency's and commercial interests wanting access to this data base

also the security agency's can get all this information anyway by having taps into the fiber optics anyway plus a whole host of other technology they can`t legally use it .....and limited to how they share it as well

again the whole idea of having a database of everyone's activity/communication and data ...is not to prevent crime....but give the people that have access to this data the ability to physiologically profile and target individuals and groups for various agendas motives

seriously you most be naive if you don`t think this will not  be used to blackmail , manipulate , persecute and discredit individuals

obviously the governments Behavioural Insights Team "nudge" team will want their grubby little hands on this info plus their psychological department "properganda" purposes


[url]http://www.behaviouralinsights.co.uk/[/url]

[QUOTE]inside the Nudge Unit is David Halpern’s first-hand account of the Behavioural Insights Team (or Nudge Unit as we quickly became known). The book explores the results of the team as it set out to translate psychological theory and an experimental approach into everyday policy.[/QUOTE]

[url]http://www.behaviouralinsights.co.uk/publications/mindspace/[/url]
[QUOTE]Before the Behavioural Insights Team was created, some of its members were working at the Institute for Government, where they were commissioned by the Cabinet Office to author a report on influencing behaviour with academics from the London School of Economics and Imperial College.

The MINDSPACE report was the result, and helped to make the case for the establishment of the Behavioural Insights Team at the heart of the UK Government.

The MINDSPACE report continues to be used by the Behavioural Insights Team as a framework to aid the application of behavioural science to the policymaking process.

The report sets out nine of the most robust influences on our behaviour, which are captured in the simple mnemonic – MINDSPACE. [/QUOTE]

Read more…

Dr. Nick Begich at the Covert Harassment Conference 2015

Dr. Nick Begich at the Covert Harassment Conference 2015
http://covertharassmentconference.com/speaker?Nick_Begich

video of speech on link

[QUOTE]Mind Control: A Brave New World together with HAARP – The Update
Manipulation of the mind, emotions and physical health of people through new applied technologies continues to draw the attention of military planners around the world. Best selling author of the book Controlling the Human Mind and lecture, Dr. Nick Begich will present the most startling advances in this area of technology for both military and private sector uses. The presentation will provide in depth information, demonstrations, background and forecasts of development of these areas of science as they affect our society and individual freedom. Enhancing human performance or controlling human outcomes will be the challenge of the century raising serious questions on the ethics of the science of mind control. Control of the human mind by external means is now a reality – how we use this technology is the next challenge for this generation.
Dr. Begich’s books are all available in German through http://www.michaelsverlag.de[/QUOTE]

Read more…

beware of this new age/ufology fake targeted individual nonsense that's being spread on the internet ...

clearly mind control & electronic harassment is done via man made technology ...we have documents etc

this "reptilian " belief is misinformation/disinformation and targeted at  people that have not read the documents about the development of man made technology and the mind control experiments

do these people actual understand we have a long documented history and many techniques that can tell if somebody is actual a victim of electronic harassment and mind control ...this is not like new age spirituality/ufology were your personal speculation/beliefs are as good as anybody else as there no way to verify it ...but there are many ways we can verify mind control and electronic harassment information...also this is not a nice area ....some fluffy situation ...people are having there lives ruined ...locked up and drugged on mental wards and also murdered or driven to murder ....
any real TI would look at her and within less then 2 mins realize shes fake ...by what and how shes talks ....but all the naive/gullible new age/spiritual/ufo believers will lap this tripe up as she uses all the buzz words and gives out all the same new age solutions ...you can use magical thinking to wish bad things away and use crystals etc ....why can`t these people just stick to there own beliefs and not shit up real information and human rights abuses ...these people are going to make fools of themselves and destroy what little credibility they have left by trying to hijack and sabotage what others are exposing with facts and evidence

Read more…

Zap to recall! Electrodes fitted inside the BRAIN could soon be used to help prevent memory loss

  • The US military wants to treat shell-shocked soldiers with memory loss
  • Two teams are testing electrical stimulation in epilepsy patients
  • Brain implants could also help people who have lost memory after strokes
Electrodes implanted in the brain could help patients with memory deficits improve their ability to recall by sending signals to the hippocampus (illustrated)

Electrodes implanted in the brain could help patients with memory deficits improve their ability to recall by sending signals to the hippocampus (illustrated)

Forget training apps and games, in the future you may be able to boost your memory by simply zapping your brain with electricity.

Neuroscientists have begun trialling implants designed to deliver electric stimulation to parts of the brain associated with memories.

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa) has funded the effort in the hope it could heal thousands of soldiers suffering from long-term memory loss.

But the 'neuroprosthetic' devices could also be of use for people whose memory is faltering due to ageing or strokes.

Research teams from the University of Southern California and University of Pennsylvania have been testing the technology on epilepsy patients. 

These patients already have electrodes implanted in their brains, which means the experts didn't need to insert the prostheses in new patients through risky brain surgery.

The research centred on the hippocampus, a seahorse-shaped part of the brain associated with the formation of memories.

The hippocampus gathers sensory information that is then transformed into short-term memories, between 15 and 30 seconds. 

These can then form more lasting memories, but only if they are accessed while the hippocampus is storing them.

People with significant memory deficits typically have a damaged hippocampus.

The USC team, led by brain implants expert Ted Berger, were interested in two particular areas of the hippocampus, called CA3 and CA1.

In particular, the team thought that an electrical signal travelling from CA3 to CA1 was key to memory formation.

Therefore, they tried to recreate a similar signal in order to restore the hippocampus' functionality.

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa) has funded the effort in the hope it could heal thousands of soldiers suffering from long-term memory loss (stock image). The 'neuroprosthetic' devices could also be of use for people whose memory is faltering due to ageing or strokes

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa) has funded the effort in the hope it could heal thousands of soldiers suffering from long-term memory loss (stock image). The 'neuroprosthetic' devices could also be of use for people whose memory is faltering due to ageing or strokes

The hippocampus gathers sensory information and transforms it into short-term memories. These form more lasting memories but only if they are accessed while the hippocampus is storing them. Brain implants that mimic the signals sent in the brain were found to boost memory in monkeys, and a human trial is underway

The hippocampus gathers sensory information and transforms it into short-term memories. These form more lasting memories but only if they are accessed while the hippocampus is storing them. Brain implants that mimic the signals sent in the brain were found to boost memory in monkeys, and a human trial is underway

To do this, the researchers monitored the brain of 12 epilepsy patients performing a memory exercise that included memorising pictures to see how CA3 and CA1 interacted.

Eventually, they developed a mathematical model to predict the pattern of the signal CA3 would fire to CA1. The predictions were correct 80 per cent of the time.

The USC team's idea is that brain implants could provide electrical stimulation resembling that key CA3 signal to improve memory in patients with hippocampus damage.

study the team carried out on monkeys in 2013 yielded promising results, as targeted stimulation significantly improved the animals' memory performance.

WHAT IS THE HIPPOCAMPUS?

The hippocampus is an area at the back of the brain, housed in the medial temporal lobe. Its name,literally, means 'seahorse', as it has an elongated and slightly curled shape.

It is in charge of transforming sensory information into short-term memories, which it stores for about 15-30 seconds. 

Only memories that are accessed during this storage phase are later transformed into lasting memories.

According to the USC study, the electrical interaction between two sections of the hippocampus called CA1 and CA3 play a decisive role in long-term memory creation.

Now Dr Berger and his colleagues are testing the system on an epileptic woman. 

However, one of the researchers, Dong Song, told Nature that it was too early to judge whether it is working.

They plan to carry out more tests on people over the coming months.

University of Pennsylvania's system also used brain-embedded electrodes, but in a slightly different way.

Rather than targeting specific hippocampus areas, the researchers instead zap the whole brain section close to the hippocampus, named the medial temporal lobe.

Stimulating this zone can boost memory in patients who struggle with recalling; however, it can actually worsen memories in healthy people.

For this study, the team monitored the brain activity of 28 people with epilepsy while they performed memory tasks.

They then created an algorithm that analysed brain signals to predict when each of the participants were likely to forget a given bit of information.

The Pennsylvania team said that firing the electrodes during a period when the patient was likely to forget could boost memory by 140 per cent.

They are currently seeking approval to carry out experiments with more specific implants. 

Read more…

Death of the town hall Stasi: Council jobsworths face two years in jail if they snoop on the public for trivial offences 

  • Powers previously used to check if bins are being put out on the right day
  • Also caught parents cheating catchment areas and people leaving dog foul
  • Councils also face an outright ban on accessing internet browsing history
  • The safeguards have been included in new Investigatory Powers Bill  
Town Hall busybodies who spy on the public for ‘trivial’ offences face two years in jail under laws unveiled today

Town Hall busybodies who spy on the public for ‘trivial’ offences face two years in jail under laws unveiled today

Town Hall busybodies who spy on the public for ‘trivial’ offences face two years in jail under laws unveiled today.

Councils also face an outright ban on accessing the public’s internet browsing history amid fears they could misuse sweeping new State surveillance powers.

The safeguards are included in the new Investigatory Powers Bill in a bid to persuade MPs and the public the controversial legislation will not turn into a ‘snoopers’ charter’.

In the past, the so-called ‘town hall Stasi’ have mounted James Bond-style operations to check if bins are being put out on the wrong day or parents are cheating school catchment area rules.

But the legislation, to be unveiled in the House of Commons today, is still expected to trigger a massive political row and face a lengthy battle to become law. It will:

  • Compel internet firms to keep details of the public’s internet records for 12 months;
  • Force web giants to hand over the contents of encrypted apps and emails on production of a warrant; 
  • Allow the security services to hack into personal computers and monitor the contents; 
  • Set down in law the right of the Government’s listening post, GCHQ, to hoover up millions of pieces of people’s personal data – including mobile phone numbers and internet searches. 

Today’s law will also include protections against MPs having their communications spied on as part of a concerted drive to avoid a Parliamentary revolt.

Under the draft Bill, technology firms will be required to keep records for 12 months, detailing when emails were sent or when people connected to social media sites, such as Twitter, Facebook and WhatsApp.

With a warrant, MI5, MI6, GCHQ and the police will able to find out details of the website a person has visited, but not which pages they have viewed on that site. A further warrant would be required to view the content of any communications.

Last night, Whitehall sources said councils would be prohibited from having any access to internet records. In limited circumstances, such as when they are investigating benefit fraud or dumping illegal waste, officials will still have access to mobile phone and other communications data.

But any Town Hall official who is caught misusing the data – or training it on people suspected of only ‘trivial’ offences – will be guilty of a criminal offence.

The maximum jail sentence will be two years. It will apply to all public authorities who ‘knowingly or recklessly obtain communications without lawful authority’.

A government source said: ‘Sometimes communications data is the only way to identify offenders, particularly where offences are committed online.

Last night, Whitehall sources said councils would be prohibited from having any access to internet records. Above, government buildings on Whitehall, London

Last night, Whitehall sources said councils would be prohibited from having any access to internet records. Above, government buildings on Whitehall, London

‘But it is important that people understand that communications data is only ever used in a necessary, proportionate and accountable way.’

In 2012, it emerged that Town Halls had been authorised to use spying powers 9,607 times over the previous three years – the equivalent of nine missions every day. The research by Big Brother Watch discovered 26 local authorities have used the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) to spy on residents to see whose pets were responsible for dog fouling. Another seven authorities used their powers to investigate suspected breaches of the smoking ban. Suffolk County Council conducted a ‘test purchase of dating agency services’.

Since then, the law has been changed to state that a local authority which wishes to obtain communications data requires the approval of a JP or magistrate. Today’s law will also include protections against MPs having their communications spied on.

MPs voiced their fury last month when a tribunal ruled the so-called Wilson Doctrine, an historical convention which barred the use of surveillance against politicians, had no basis in law.

Members demanded to know how many warrants had been issued by ministers authorising snooping on their phone calls, emails and internet use. They will now be given specific safeguards, above and beyond those which the public have.

Officials claim the Bill will set ‘new standards for openness and transparency’, including ‘world-leading oversight arrangements’.

But Whitehall insiders are braced for a ferocious fight with civil liberties groups, campaigning MPs and the House of Lords. The battle – which will last for six months or more – is certain to focus on whether ministers or judges should give approval for intrusive spying operations, such as bugging a phone or reading the content of a suspect’s emails.

Labour and Liberal Democrat MPs, backed by some Tory backbenchers, insist ministers should hand over responsibility to the judiciary. But Theresa May, who signed 2,345 requests last year, is reluctant to give up the power to judges who are not directly accountable to Parliament or the public.

There are also concerns about the police and security services being able to get warrants signed in the middle of the night for ‘life or death’ operations. Mrs May is understood to favour a new regime where ministers would sign the warrant, but it would be scrutinised by a senior judge afterwards

Read more…

Shaker Aamer in line for taxpayer-funded payout of £1MILLION as he leaves Guantanamo on a private jet after 14 years without charge

  • Father-of-four had been held at the U.S. military prison in Cuba since 2002 
  • Mr Aamer, 46, says he was working as charity worker in Afghanistan when he was kidnapped and handed over to US forces in 2001  
  • He says he was tortured and held in solitary confinement for 360 days
  • He flew in to Kent on private jet at a cost of £50,000 to the British taxpayer

For nearly 14 years he endured torture and solitary confinement without ever being charged or put on trial.

But Britain’s final Guantanamo detainee had a tearful reunion with his wife last night after finally being set free.

And today Shaker Aamer hopes to meet for the first time the 13-year-old son who was born while he was in custody. After flying home on a UK government jet the 46-year-old issued a statement thanking ‘everyone who has helped make today possible including the campaigners at the Daily Mail’.

Shaker Aamer
Shaker Aamer arrives back in the UK at Biggin Hill airport in south-east London

Shaker Aamer, the last British prisoner in Guantanamo Bay has landed back in the UK (right) after finally being been released from the notorious jail in Cuba

He added: ‘The reason I have been strong is because of the support of people so strongly devoted to the truth.

‘I am overwhelmed by what people have done by their actions, their thoughts and their prayers, and without their devotion to justice I would not be here in Britain now.’

The Saudi-born father of four hugged his wife Zinnara at a private London clinic where he had been taken for extensive medical checks. She has bought him his first fresh clothes after years of prison uniforms – a jumper and shirt from Primark.

The man known as ‘Prisoner 239’ at the notorious US detention centre in Cuba touched down at Biggin Hill airport in Kent at around 1pm. He was flown in on a £23million Gulfstream IV chartered at a likely £50,000 cost that was split 50-50 by the Home Office and the Foreign Office.

The 46-year-old arrived on a private plane, a £23 million Gulfstream IV, at Biggin Hill in south-east London

The 46-year-old arrived on a private plane, a £23 million Gulfstream IV, at Biggin Hill in south-east London

Mr Aamer is expected to be taken for a health check-up before returning to his home in Battersea, London

Mr Aamer is expected to be taken for a health check-up before returning to his home in Battersea, London

As Mr Aamer made his dramatic homecoming, it emerged that:

  • The Government is likely to offer him well over £1million to keep quiet about allegations of UK complicity in torture;
  • Downing Street said Mr Aamer was ‘free’ and would not be detained;
  • Intelligence agents are likely to want to interview him but he will not be placed under close surveillance.

In an emotional first phone call to his family, shortly after the plane landed, Mr Aamer wept for joy and repeatedly thanked everyone who had fought for his freedom – including the Mail, his family, his lawyers and campaigners.

‘Shaker was really tearful but they were tears of pure happiness,’ said his father-in-law Saeed Siddique, 73. ‘He was so joyful and he just kept saying thanks to everyone. And he thanked God for hastening his release and sending him back to us. Right up until the last minute he didn’t believe he would be released, and he still sounded surprised – as though it was a miracle.’

Before leaving Guantanamo, Mr Aamer told his lawyers he wanted to meet his wife alone, before being reunited with his four children because he wanted her to spend some time telling him about each of them. The reunion took place when she visited him in the clinic, Mr Siddique told the Mail. ‘She took with her a few things she had bought for him, and she has decorated the house specially for his return.

‘She has bought a new carpet and units for the kitchen and the bedroom. We have also bought him a new outfit of clothes, including a jumper and shirt, from Primark. It may be a few days before he comes home. We know his health is not good so first he needs a full MOT.’

SHAKER AAMER IS SET FOR £1M IN TAXPAYER-FUNDED DAMAGES PAYOUT

By Jack Doyle, Political Correspondent for The Daily Mail 

Shaker Aamer is in line for a taxpayer-funded payout of at least £1million.

A compensation deal was agreed in 2010 between the British Government and lawyers representing Guantanamo detainees following legal action.

The group, many of whom said they were victims of rendition and torture, sued the Government over its involvement.

Many alleged British secret service complicity in their mistreatment at the American base.

Ministers settled the case saying they could not defend it without damaging British security by revealing secret intelligence information.

Last night Mr Aamer’s father- in-law Saeed Siddique said his son-in-law had the right to be compensated for the time he has spent in custody.

He said: ‘He has the right to apply. He has been offered compensation when he was there.

‘The important thing is his freedom, and money doesn’t matter.

‘Of course we are thankful and grateful and appreciate everybody [who campaigned for his release].’

He added: ‘Justice came but really late, too late.’

Mr Aamer’s settlement could be among the largest because of the length of his detention.

Others given cash include Binyam Mohamed, a British resident who claims MI5 and MI6 fed questions to his CIA-backed torturers.

Details of the deals were shrouded in secrecy and all sides bound by confidentiality agreements.

The Prime Minister’s official spokesman said yesterday: ‘There was a settlement in relation to detainees in 2010.

‘That was subject to a legally-binding confidentiality agreement. I cannot go into details of who was party to it.’

Mr Aamer’s eldest child, Johina, 18, who last saw him when she was four, personally waged a campaign of letter writing to secure his release.

She wrote to David Cameron last year, and Jack Straw when she was seven, telling the then foreign secretary: ‘He used to love me when he was with us.’

The couple also have sons Michael, born in 1999, Saif, born in 2000, and Faris, 13. Faris was born on Valentine’s Day 2002, the day Mr Aamer arrived at the detention camp, and they have never met.

The family lives in a three-bedroom council house in Battersea, South London.

Tory MP David Davis, chairman of the Shaker Aamer all-party group in Parliament, said: ‘I can only imagine the hardships that Shaker has undergone during his lengthy incarceration, and I wish him a rapid return to health in the bosom of his family.’

The Prime Minister’s official spokesman confirmed there were no plans to detain Mr Aamer. ‘He is free to be reunited with his family,’ she said, but added: ‘The Prime Minister has been clear that the public should be reassured that everything to ensure public safety is in place.’

The US released Mr Aamer on condition the British would guarantee he posed no threat.

Given British residency in 1996, Mr Aamer was described in US military files as a ‘close associate of Osama Bin Laden’ who fought in the battle of Tora Bora. He insists he was working as a charity worker in Afghanistan when he was kidnapped and handed over to US forces in 2001.

DAILY MAIL CAMPAIGN SAID TO HAVE HELPED PERSUADE US AUTHORITIES 

The role of the Daily Mail in securing Shaker Aamer’s freedom won high praise last night.

Clive Stafford Smith, who is his lawyer, said: ‘Both I and Shaker want to thank all of you at the Daily Mail and Paul Dacre personally for the really solid support they’ve shown not just for Shaker but for the notion of human rights and decency.’

Mr Aamer’s family say this paper’s relentless campaign was a major factor in persuading the US authorities to release him. His father-in-law Saeed Siddique said he was ‘thankful and grateful’. Andrew Mitchell, a Tory former cabinet minister, said: ‘Enormous credit is due to the campaigners who have fought his corner, often standing for hours in the cold and rain to keep his case before the public gaze, and to the Daily Mail who alone amongst the British media raised serious questions.’

Joanne MacInnes, of the We Stand With Shaker campaign, said the Mail had been fantastic. 

During his time held without trial, his lawyers said he was subjected to torture, with beatings and sleep deprivation, and held in solitary confinement for 360 days. In his early days of captivity, in Afghanistan, he says he was tortured in the presence of British agents.

The Mail has always stressed that Mr Aamer may have done bad things – but since he was never charged or given a trial, every day of his incarceration in Guantanamo represented another grotesque affront to justice and a propaganda gift for terrorists.

His lawyer Clive Stafford-Smith said he was prepared to co-operate with the authorities.

‘We have offered them any security arrangements they like,’ he added.

‘If anyone has question marks they always have the opportunity to charge him and we’ve said that for years.’

Last night it was claimed that high-level discussions had taken place between London and Washington over how the British security services will monitor Mr Aamer.

Lord Carlile, the former independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, said: ‘The state cannot arbitrarily place restrictions upon him. It would be quite wrong to demonise him because there is no evidence to justify demonising him in 2015.’ 

Mr Aamer is believed to have been taken away from the airport by a Harley Street private ambulance service

Mr Aamer is believed to have been taken away from the airport by a Harley Street private ambulance service

A man thought to be Mr Aamer is treated in an ambulance after his plane landed at Biggin Hill aiport

A man thought to be Mr Aamer is treated in an ambulance after his plane landed at Biggin Hill aiport

 
Father-of-four Shaker Aamer (pictured with his daughter Johina and son Michael), who has been detained at the U.S. military jail in Cuba since 2002, was cleared for release at the end of last month

Father-of-four Shaker Aamer (pictured with his daughter Johina and son Michael), who has been detained at the U.S. military jail in Cuba since 2002, was cleared for release at the end of last month

Manacled in a tiny cell for 22 hours a day

By David Jones for The Daily Mail 

Not until the wheels of his Gulfstream jet left the tarmac, and he gazed from the cabin window to see the lights of the Cuban coast disappearing in the darkness, will Shaker Aamer have allowed himself to believe he was finally free from the hell of Guantanamo Bay.

To understand his scepticism, you need to have been inside the US detention camp and witnessed its Kafkaesque regime. It is a place where the rules of justice, as we know them, do not apply.

A place where orders can be handed out and rescinded in an instant, as Washington commands – a fact that Aamer knew only too well after twice hearing that his release had been sanctioned, only to see his hopes dashed without so much as a word of explanation.

And only those who have visited ‘Gitmo’ – seen the desperation in the eyes of its wretched prisoners, and stood inside one of their spartan, white-walled little cells – will comprehend how Aamer must have felt yesterday, as he stepped off the plane and took his first gulp of autumnal Kent air.

Having been there on three occasions, including earlier this month, I can imagine the mixture of overwhelming joy and utter bewilderment he must have experienced.

In ‘Gitmo’, Aamer was not regarded as a person. Ever since Valentine’s Day, 2002, when he was dumped at the prison – his hands and feet shackled, his senses blanked out by earmuffs and a blindfold – he has simply been a number.

His guards were under strict orders to address him always as Detainee 239, his identification serial code.

During one tour of the detention facility, I witnessed the despair of his daily routine. Confined for up to 22 hours each day in a dank cell permanently lit by halogen lights, for long periods Aamer wasn’t even allowed a pen, paper or books for stimulation. He was denied these basic items as a punishment for what his guards term ‘non-compliance’. In other words, refusing to eat and otherwise protesting against the injustice of his plight.

His cell was so small that its white concrete walls were barely an arm-span apart. According to Aamer’s testimony to police, the two ceiling lights were sometimes so dim that he could barely see his hand – then they were turned up so brightly that the cell rapidly transformed into a sauna.

He said that underneath a window was a hole-in-the-ground toilet, and a metal sink. ‘The guards could come along and flash lights into your eyes through the door, to make sleeping even less possible.

‘The MPs [military police] would put a bowl of Pinesol disinfectant by the vent, or spray it directly in, so that it would almost suffocate the men in the cells, particularly if you had an asthma problem.’

Other alleged techniques used on the prisoners were for staff to leave the water running all day, making a noise to prevent inmates from sleeping, and force-feeding.

Prisoners, it was claimed, would be strapped into the chairs and restrained at the legs, arms, shoulders and head. Aamer said: ‘A tube the thickness of a finger was forcibly inserted up the nose and down into the stomach. Large quantities of liquid formula was pumped through the tube. This would often be more than the stomach could hold and the effect was sometimes a painful bout of nausea, vomiting, bloating, and shortness of breath.’

For most of his nearly 14 years in Guantanamo, indeed until his very last day, Aamer was held in Camp V – where he was kept in solitary confinement as a punishment for his ‘non-compliant’ behaviour.

Mr Aamer says he has been tortured during his time at Guantanamo Bay (above) in Cuba

Mr Aamer says he has been tortured during his time at Guantanamo Bay (above) in Cuba

Such was the desperation among prisoners on this block that they would voice their despair by any possible means, as I saw on one visit, while standing just a few feet from Aamer’s cell door. When one of the prisoners saw me through the slit window, he began to wail and moan and within seconds the others had joined him so that a chilling, cattle-like lowing echoed through the corridors.

Then came a rhythmic volley of dull thuds — the sound of flesh and bone crashing into metal as the prisoners flung themselves, with every ounce of pent-up force, at the cell doors.After enduring such an appalling ordeal, it is obvious that returning to normal life will be hugely traumatic.

Indeed, having envisaged how fraught his homecoming would be, Aamer issued strict instructions that his wife, Zin, and four children – including the 13-year-old son he has never met – must not be at the Kent airport to meet him.

His lawyer Cori Crider says he wanted it that way because his wife ‘had been through the ordeal with him’ and he also wanted her to tell him all about the children before he actually saw them.

Yesterday afternoon, therefore, she went alone to see him at the London Clinic, off Harley Street, where he is being examined.

Though the rest of his family must have been desperate to hug him and take him home for a joyful celebration, he insisted that they must stay at home until he feels emotionally ready for a reunion.

By rights, Aamer ought to have been released a week ago, at the end of the 30-day consultation period granted to the US Congress before Guantanamo prisoners are ‘transferred out’, to use the euphemistic Pentagon jargon.

The release process was described to me by Brigadier General David Heath, Guantanamo’s granite-jawed commander, during my recent visit.

A few days before Aamer was to be freed, General Heath said he would visit him in Camp V – the bleak isolation block where he spent many of the past 5,008 days in solitary confinement – and break the news.

‘I like to do that personally when detainees are being transferred out,’ the much-decorated Montana soldier told me. ‘I shake their hand and wish them good luck.’

But there would be no apology. No words of regret for the years Aamer had spent in arbitrary captivity. No explanation for this most basic denial of justice.

Spartan: Inside one of the cramped cells at Guantanamo Bay, where Mr Aamer was held for 13 years

Spartan: Inside one of the cramped cells at Guantanamo Bay, where Mr Aamer was held for 13 years

Commander Heath said he wouldn’t even revert to calling Detainee 239 by his name.

Next it was just a matter of counting down the hours and minutes to his freedom.

That moment came around 11pm on Thursday, local time. A guard would have opened the reinforced iron door. Aamer would have been manacled – as always when he was moved – and taken to a waiting vehicle by a team of armed guards wearing protective clothing and visors.

Then, as darkness enveloped the US Naval base, he would have been driven to a waiting boat and ferried across the starlit bay to the airfield.

There might have been a farewell from his favourite guard, if he was on duty. If not, there would have been not a flicker of sentiment as he was bundled on to the waiting plane.

Had it been a US aircraft, Aamer would have remained in chains for the ten-hour flight. As the plane was sent by Britain, at a cost of about £50,000 to the taxpayer, he will have been free to sit as comfortably as one can, after so much hardship.

Most likely, he would have been permitted to swap his prison uniform for fresh clothes – and shoes to replace the rotting sandals he has worn these past five years.

After 14 years without justice that was the least that he deserved.

It now remains for Aamer to recover his health, return to his wife – who has suffered serious bouts of depression since he was captured – and his children, including the 13-year-old son he has never known.

No doubt, in time, this once-loquacious man will also wish to tell the world his unexpurgated story. For their part, the authorities, both British and American, will be very wary about what he might have to say.

DAVID CAMERON SAID THERE ARE NO PLANS TO DETAIN SHAKER AAMER 

David Cameron last night welcomed Shaker Aamer’s return to the UK and said there were ‘no plans’ to detain him.

The Prime Minister’s spokesman said the former Guantanamo detainee would be ‘free to be reunited with his family’ in London. Downing Street also repeated assurances made by the PM last month that ‘everything necessary to ensure public safety has been put in place’.

However, it is thought highly unlikely Mr Aamer will be put under formal surveillance by police or the security agencies. To do so would require a current intelligence case against him.

The length of time he has been in Guantanamo means there is no recent evidence against him.

The accusations of activities in Afghanistan, which pre-date his arrival in the camp, are in any case fiercely disputed by his lawyers. Similarly, there is no legal basis for putting him under a Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measure which could limit his movement and activities, or for confiscating his passport. He was never put on trial by the US, so in legal terms is an innocent man.

Previous Guantanamo detainees are thought to have been interviewed briefly by police on their return and it is likely officers will want speak to Mr Aamer. Arrangements to bring him home were made by the Foreign Office, Home Office and Scotland Yard. These were similar to those for previous returning Guantanamo detainees.

The father of four was accompanied on the flight back to the UK by a Foreign Office representative and a police officer.

 

Troubling questions that may never be answered 

By Guy Adams for The Daily Mail 

Shaker Aamer was a family man living in the UK when he made the fateful decision to uproot his wife and children and move to Kabul. We tell how it led to years of hell in Guantanamo. 

GLOBE-TROTTER WHO RAN OFF TO THE U.S.

Shaker Aamer was born in 1968, one of five children from a prosperous family from Medina in Saudi Arabia, the second holiest city in Islam. His parents divorced when he was young, and his father soon remarried, leaving him to be raised by a stepmother.

After training as a nurse in Jeddah, he decided aged 17 to run away from his ‘unkind’ stepmother. He bought a one-way ticket to the USA and worked briefly at a coffee shop near Atlanta, before moving to Gaithersburg in Maryland, where he lived with family friends.

Over the ensuing years, Aamer became a confident speaker of Arabic and English, and was duly hired by the US military to work as a translator in Saudi Arabia during the 1991 Gulf War.

He subsequently spent a few years travelling around the Middle East and Europe, before winding up in London in the mid-1990s.

DEEPLY RELIGIOUS, AND SO IN LOVE 

During his late-20s, Aamer became increasingly religious. Shortly after arriving in London, he met a man called Saeed Siddique at a mosque in Battersea and, after disclosing that he was interested in marrying, was introduced to Siddique’s daughter, Zinnira.

The couple swiftly fell in love. ‘He is so funny,’ Zinnira has said. ‘If he was here now, he would make you laugh.’ They married in 1996, when Aamer was 28, and their first child, Johina, was born the following year.

Having tied the knot, Aamer was granted indefinite leave to remain in the UK and decided to apply for full citizenship.

The immigration lawyer processing his application quickly gave him work translating and helping refugees find accommodation. Two more children, Michael and Saif, were born in 1999 and 2000 respectively.

A FATEFUL MOVE TO TALIBAN CAPITAL 

In June 2001, with the citizenship application still pending, Aamer decided to uproot his wife – who by that stage was pregnant again – and young children, by moving to the Afghan capital of Kabul, which was then under the control of the Taliban.

The million-dollar question is: why?

Supporters have, over the years, consistently claimed that he wanted to pursue a more ‘peaceful’ life in the deeply conservative country, working for Islamic charities who were building schools in remote regions.

A subtly different explanation is, however, ventured by the Left-wing journalist Victoria Brittain, who interviewed Zinnira and several others for a 2013 book on the ‘Forgotten Women of the War on Terror’.

‘Shaker, like several of his friends, began to think about moving to Afghanistan, to be part of building a pure Islamic state, leaving Britain and western culture behind for ever,’ she wrote. ‘They saw Afghanistan as a chance to make Islamic dreams come true.’

The US has, meanwhile, claimed that he travelled there to train with and fight for Al-Qaeda, using the charitable work as a cover story.

CHARITY WORKER OR ENEMY FIGHTER? 

Whatever motivation lay behind the move, Aamer and his family swiftly moved into a large home in a residential area of Kabul.

They shared the property with a fellow expat who would also wind up in Guantanamo Bay: Moazzam Begg, an Islamic bookstore owner from Birmingham.

The two clans (Begg was with his wife Zeynab, and four children) appear to have thrown themselves wholeheartedly into their new lives. The women decorated the property, and purchased a new washing machine, while the men spent their days digging wells and building schools.

The Islamic charity that Aamer supposedly worked for during this period has never been named.

It has, instead, been described, variously, by his supporters as a ‘Muslim charity building schools for Afghan orphans’, a ‘Saudi Arabian charity’ and a ‘children’s charity’.

The Americans say, however, that he was there as an enemy fighter and close to terrorist leader Osama Bin Laden.

Mr Aamer's lawyer Clive Stafford Smith waits as a plane carrying the Briton arrives at Biggin Hill Airport

Mr Aamer's lawyer Clive Stafford Smith waits as a plane carrying the Briton arrives at Biggin Hill Airport

THE DEADLY PURSUIT THROUGH KHYBER PASS 

Soon after 9/11, the US decided to drive the Taliban from Afghanistan, and started bombing Kabul. With Zinnira by then heavily pregnant (and increasingly eager to return to Britain), the Aamers decided to travel to the comparative safety of Pakistan. The Beggs came with them.

By October 2001, with the Taliban in full retreat, the two families reached the eastern Afghan city of Jalalabad. From there, they piled into a rickety camper van, and wound through the Khyber Pass towards the border.

However, the region was by then being patrolled by Afghan Northern Alliance fighters — enemies of the Taliban — who were looking out for suspicious fleeing foreigners to ‘sell’ to the Americans in return for a $5,000 reward.

Aamer and Begg say that the bounty-hunters were only searching for men they could hand over for a price.

They therefore decided to stay behind, until the crossing could be completed more safely, while sending their wives and children ahead of them across the border.

SOLD INTO CAPTIVITY BY BOUNTY HUNTERS 

The pair’s attempts to evade capture did not last long.

Shortly before Christmas 2001, Aamer was seized by the Northern Alliance in a village near Jalalabad (Begg was taken a few days later). He was then transported to Kabul, sold to the Americans and taken to Bagram air base for interrogation.

After several weeks of questioning, in conditions that are alleged to have at times amounted to torture, the US decided that he was a dangerous terrorist.

Military case files, which were later obtained by the whistleblower site WikiLeaks, provide an insight into their line of thinking: they described him as a ‘close associate of Osama Bin Laden’ who was close to a number of senior Al-Qaeda figures.

The case files claimed Aamer led a unit of Al-Qaeda fighters on the front line in the battle of Tora Bora, in which US troops narrowly failed to capture Bin Laden. During his time in the country, his family was paid a ‘monthly stipend’ to remain at home in Kabul. Aamer’s claim that he was a harmless charity worker was untrue, his interrogators decided.

Instead, they came to the view that he was a long-standing extremist, who had most probably become radicalised in the early 1990s, after leaving the US and before coming to the UK. During that period, they believe that he worked in Bosnia for the Revival of Islamic Heritage Society, a ‘humanitarian’ organisation later blacklisted by the UN for supporting terror.

Aamer was taken to Guantanamo Bay on February 14, 2002. Begg also spent nearly three years in Guantanamo before being charged in the UK with terror-related offences. The charges have since been dropped.

It should, of course, be stressed that during the ensuing 13 years, no allegation against Aamer was ever tested in court (indeed, the US first ‘cleared’ him for release in 2007).

With this in mind, Aamer’s lawyers say the only evidence against their client consists of ‘confessions’ that were obtained via torture, along with untrue testimony from other terror suspects who had been offered leniency in return for wrongly implicating him.

Read more…

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/11961415/Google-wants-to-monitor-your-mental-health.-You-should-welcome-it-into-your-mind.html

Google wants to monitor your mental health. You should welcome it into your mind

The use of technology to track and treat mental illness is deeply worrying but sadly necessary

2K
647
6
72
3K
Email
Cybercrime image of hooded person and laptop
Yes, you should tell the computer what you're thinking Photo: Shutterstock

Next week, Dr Tom Insel leaves his post as head of the US National Institute of Mental Health, a job that made him America’s top mental health doctor. Dr Insel is a neuroscientist and a psychiatrist and a leading authority on both the medicine and public policies needed to deal with problems of the mind. He’s 64 but he’s not retiring. He’s going to work for Google.

More precisely, he’s going to work for Google Life Sciences, one of the more exotic provinces of the online empire. He’s going to investigate how technology can help diagnose and treat mental health conditions. Google doesn’t just want to read your mind, it wants to fix it too.

It’s not alone. Apple, IBM and Intel are among technology companies exploring the same field. IBM this year carried out research with Columbia University that suggested computer analysis of speech patterns can more accurately predict the onset of psychosis than conventional tests involving blood samples or brain scans. Other researchers theorise that a person’s internet search history or even shopping habits (so handily recorded by your innocuous loyalty card) can identify the first signs of mental illness. Computers can now tell when something is about to go terribly wrong in someone’s mind.

"We now live in a world where your phone might observe you to help assess your mental health."

That development is striking enough in itself, but the way in which researchers like Dr Insel want to use this new technological power raises even more questions.

Wearable technology has been a hot topic in medical innovation for several years now. A growing number of people choose to track their own physical condition using FitBits, Jawbones and other activity trackers, tiny wearable devices that monitor your movements, pulse rate, sleep patterns and more. Once the preserve of obsessive fitness fanatics, “self-monitoring” has the scope to transform healthcare. The ever-increasing number of people with chronic conditions can track and electronically report their symptoms, reducing the number of routine (and expensive) consultations they need with medical staff and ensuring a quicker response to changes that do require direct professional attention.

Self-monitoring will also surely play a bigger role in preventive public health. Wearing a pedometer that counts the number of steps you take in a day has been shown to spur people to walk more. What would happen to your consumption of alcohol and sugar if a device strapped to your wrist displayed a continuous count of your calorie and unit intake for the week?

Dr Insel is part of a school of thought that suggests this technology is even better suited to mental health. The symptoms of depression, for instance, are inconstant, ebbing and rising without obvious pattern. A short consultation with a doctor once every few weeks is thus a poor means of diagnosis. But wearable technology allows continuous monitoring. A small portable device might monitor your tone of voice, speech patterns and physical movements, picking up the early signs of trouble. A device such as a mobile telephone.

Yes, we now live in a world where your phone might observe you to help assess your mental health. If you don’t find that prospect disturbing, you’re either fantastically trusting of companies and governments or you haven’t thought about it enough.

But that feeling of unease should not determine our response to technology in mental health. In fact, we should embrace and encourage the tech giants as they seek to chart the mind and its frailties, albeit on the condition that we can overcome the enormous challenge of devising rules and regulations protecting privacy and consent.

Because, simply, existing healthcare systems are failing and will continue to fail on mental health. Even if the current model of funding the NHS was sustainable, the stigma that prevents us discussing mental health problems would ensure their prevention and treatment got a disproportionately small slice of the pie.

We pour ever more billions into dealing with the worst problems of physical health, and with considerable success. Death rates from cancer and heart disease have fallen markedly over the last 40 years. Over the same period, suicide rates have gone up.

Even as the NHS budget grows, NHS trusts’ spending on mental health is falling. If someone with cancer went untreated, we’d say it was a scandal. Some estimates suggest one in five people who need “talking therapies” don’t get them. In a rare bit of enlightened thinking, some NHS trusts are supporting Big White Wall, an online service where people can anonymously report stress, anxiety and depression, take simple clinical tests and talk to therapists.

Technology will never be a panacea for mental illnesses, or our social failure to face up to them. But anything that makes them cheaper and easier and more mundane to deal with should be encouraged.

If you think the idea of Google assessing your state of mind and your phone monitoring you for depression is worrying, you’re right. But what’s more worrying is that allowing these things is the least bad option on mental health.

Troubled youths: hospitals have treated 18,037 girls and 4,623 boys in the past year (picture posed by a model)'Our mental health services are one of the great scandals of our time'  Photo: Getty Images

Read more…

Forget X-rays, now you can see through walls using WI-FI: Device captures silhouettes and can even identify people when they're stood behind CONCRETE

  • The RF Capture device was developed by researchers at MIT
  • Wireless signals travel through the wall and reflect off the body behind it
  • This creates a silhouette from which body parts can be identified
  • Silhouettes can then be compared to a database of bodies to identify who they belong to - and it can even identify which hand their moving 

X-ray vision is a staple of sci-fi films and comic books and now researchers have turned this concept into a reality. 

Using a wireless transmitter fitted behind a wall, computer scientists have developed a device that can map a nearby room in 3D while scanning for human bodies.

Using the signals that bounce and reflect off these people, the device creates an accurate silhouette and can even use this silhouette to identify who that person is. 

Scroll down for video 

Using a wireless transmitter fitted behind a wall, computer scientists have developed a device that can map a nearby room in 3D while scanning for human bodies. Using the signals that reflect off these people, the device creates an accurate silhouette (pictured) and can even use this silhouette to identify who that person is

Using a wireless transmitter fitted behind a wall, computer scientists have developed a device that can map a nearby room in 3D while scanning for human bodies. Using the signals that reflect off these people, the device creates an accurate silhouette (pictured) and can even use this silhouette to identify who that person is

The device is called RF Capture and it was developed by researchers at MIT's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab (CSAIL). 

It has long been thought that wireless signals, such as Wi-Fi, can be used to see things that are invisible to the naked eye. 

With this in mind the researchers have been developing technologies that use wireless signals to track human motion since 2013.

As part of its latest research, the team has shown that these technologies can detect gestures and body movements as subtle as the rise and fall of a person's chest from the other side of a house. 

HOW RF CAPTURE WORKS

The device transmits wireless signals that travel through the wall and reflect off a person's body back to the device.

It begins by scanning the 3D space to capture wireless reflections of objects in the room, including the human body. 

Since only a subset of body parts reflect the signal back at any given point in time, the device then monitors how these reflections vary as someone moves and walks.

It can intelligently stitch the person's reflections across time to reconstruct his silhouette into a single image.

Once captured, these reflections are analysed.

To differentiate between people, the team repeatedly tested and trained the device on different subjects, using metrics such as height and shape to create concrete 'silhouette fingerprints' for each person.

The team continued that the emitted radiation is approximately 10,000 times lower than that of a standard phone.

This could allow a mother to monitor a baby's breathing, for example, or help a firefighter determine if there are survivors inside a burning building.  

The RF Capture device transmits wireless signals that travel through a wall and reflect off a person's body back to the device.

It begins by scanning the 3D space to capture wireless reflections of objects in the room, including any human bodies.

Since only a small number of body parts reflect the signal back at any given point in time, the device monitors how these reflections vary as someone moves and walks.

It can then intelligently stitch the person's reflections across time to reconstruct their silhouette into a single image.

Once captured, these reflections are analysed.

To differentiate between people, the team repeatedly tested and trained the device on different subjects, using metrics such as height and shape to create concrete 'silhouette fingerprints' for each person.

During tests, the device was able to trace a person's hand as he wrote in mid-air, and could even distinguish between 15 different people through a wall with nearly 90 per cent accuracy.

In other words, from the opposite side of a building RF Capture can determine where that person is, who they are, and even which hand they are moving. 

The device is called RF Capture and it was developed by researchers at MIT's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab (CSAIL). It begins by scanning the 3D space to capture wireless reflections of objects in the next room, including any human bodies (pictured)

The device is called RF Capture and it was developed by researchers at MIT's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab (CSAIL). It begins by scanning the 3D space to capture wireless reflections of objects in the next room, including any human bodies (pictured)

Since only a small number of body parts reflect the signal back at any given point in time, the device then monitors how these reflections vary as someone moves and walks (illustrated). It can intelligently stitch the person's reflections across time to reconstruct this silhouette into a single image

Since only a small number of body parts reflect the signal back at any given point in time, the device then monitors how these reflections vary as someone moves and walks (illustrated). It can intelligently stitch the person's reflections across time to reconstruct this silhouette into a single image

The researchers said the technology could have major implications for everything from gaming and film-making to emergency-response and elder-care.

'The data you get back from these reflections is very minimal,' said researcher Dina Katabi, director of Wireless@MIT.

'However, we can extract meaningful signals through a series of algorithms we developed that minimize the random noise produced by the reflections.

'We're working to turn this technology into an in-home device that can call 911 if it detects that a family member has fallen unconscious.

'You could also imagine it being used to operate your lights and TVs, or to adjust your heating by monitoring where you are in the house.'

To differentiate between people, the team repeatedly tested and trained the device on different subjects, using metrics such as height, shape and pose to create concrete 'silhouette fingerprints' for each person (pictured)

To differentiate between people, the team repeatedly tested and trained the device on different subjects, using metrics such as height, shape and pose to create concrete 'silhouette fingerprints' for each person (pictured)

During tests, the device was able to trace a person's hand as he wrote in mid-air and could even distinguish between 15 different people through a wall with nearly 90% accuracy. In other words, from the opposite side of a building RF Capture can determine where that person is, who they are, and even which hand they are moving

During tests, the device was able to trace a person's hand as he wrote in mid-air and could even distinguish between 15 different people through a wall with nearly 90% accuracy. In other words, from the opposite side of a building RF Capture can determine where that person is, who they are, and even which hand they are moving

Future versions could be integrated into games, allowing people to interact with a game from different rooms or even trigger distinct actions based on which hand they move.

'The possibilities are vast,' added PhD student Fadel Adib.

'We're just at the beginning of thinking about the different ways to use these technologies.'

The results are published in the paper, Capturing the Human Figure Through a Wall, which has been accepted to the SIGGRAPH Asia conference taking place next month. 

Other co-authors include MIT professor Frédo Durand, PhD student Chen-Yu Hsu and undergraduate intern Hongzi Mao.  

 

Read more…

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3282309/Security-services-given-new-rights-spy-phones-computers-Dizzying-range-electronic-surveillance-equipment-set-available-MI5-MI6-GCHQ-new-laws.html

Security services given new rights to spy on your phones and computers: 'Dizzying' range of electronic surveillance equipment set to be made available to MI5, MI6 and GCHQ under new laws

  • Proposals give powers to take control of devices through software flaw
  • Allows them to us computers and phones to listen in to things around 
  • Agencies say they need new powers to fight cyber-crime and terrorism
  • Civil liberties campaigners are expected to oppose the new bill 

Security agencies could be given a 'dizzying' range of powers with laws aiming to give them the right to take control of phones and computers for surveillance. 

MI5, MI6 and GCHQ would be granted a range of electronic surveillance capabilities under the Government's Investigatory Powers Bill, allowing them to legally hack phones, tablets and laptops.

Privacy campaigners have warned against increasing surveillance powers, but the Government and senior intelligence services say they are more important than ever because of electronic crime and the threat from Islamist extremists.

MI5, MI6 and GCHQ would be granted a range of electronic surveillance capabilities under the Government's Investigatory Powers Bill, allowing them to legally hack phones, tablets and laptops

MI5, MI6 and GCHQ would be granted a range of electronic surveillance capabilities under the Government's Investigatory Powers Bill, allowing them to legally hack phones, tablets and laptops

The new laws would give security agencies the power to hack devices, with permission from the Home Secretary, rather than simply intercepting them, which is becoming increasingly difficult.

Online criminals and terrorist can encrypt their communications, which means that when they are intercepted, they may be impossible to interpret.

However, hacking a device allows the hacker to access everything in it, usually via a security flaw in the software.

The difference is that is would allow the hacker to take control of the device, using parts of it such as the speaker or microphone, and accessing data from the source before it is encrypted.

Peter Sommer, a digital evidence expert, told The Times: 'Increasingly, (intelligence agents) can't read communications sent over the internet because of encryption, so their ability to get information from interception is diminishing. 

Hacking is different from interception because it allows hackers to take control of the device, using it for surveillance and accessing data from the source, rather than simply  

Hacking is different from interception because it allows hackers to take control of the device, using it for surveillance and accessing data from the source, rather than simply  

'The best way around this is to get inside someone's computer.'

It comes after US whistleblower Edward Snowden claimed British spies had the ability to turn people's mobile phones off and on and switch on the microphone to listen to what is happening around them. 

In February, the Government admitted for the first time that it was using the Intelligence Services Act 1994 to hack people's computers and use them for surveillance

But critics argued the act did not give them the legal right to do access phones and computers, making the intrusion unlawful.

In June, David Anderson QC, the independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, recommended the government introduce a bill that allows them to legally access people's devices for security.

He said that the technique 'presents a dizzying array of possibilities' to security agencies. 

The Times reported the hacking powers outlined in the new Bill, which could be presented next month, were not included in the Communications Data Bill, which was dubbed the 'snoopers' charter' and blocked by the Liberal Democrats in coalition.

The bill was heavily opposed by civil liberties campaigners who raised concerns over spies being allowed to take control of electronic devices, but the new legislation seeks to enshrine that ability as a right in law. 

The Home Secretary this week confirmed a form of the Wilson Doctrine, which prevents the interception of politicians' communications except for national security reasons, will also be included in the Bill after a court ruled it had no legal basis.

Any new laws will need to be in place by December 2016 when temporary surveillance powers passed by the coalition government expire, Theresa May told MPs in June.

Read more…

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/oct/13/cia-torture-survivors-sue-psychologists-aclu

CIA torture survivors sue psychologists who designed infamous program

  • Psychologists James Mitchell and Bruce Jessen targeted by lawsuit
  • ACLU sues on behalf of suspects subjected to mock drowning and more

0:00
/
8:10
Survivors of CIA torture are suing the contractor psychologists who designed one of the most infamous programs of the post-9/11 era. Salim, one of the three ex-detainees in the suit, is a Tanzanian fisherman who says flashbacks from his ordeal in CIA custody are a permanent part of his life.

Survivors of CIA torture have sued the contractor psychologists who designed one of the most infamous programs of the post-9/11 era.

In an extraordinary step, psychologists James Mitchell and Bruce Jessen now face a federal lawsuit for their role in convincing the CIA to subject terror suspects to mock drowning, painful bodily contortions, sleep and dietary deprivation and other methods long rejected by much of the world as torture.

In practice, CIA torture meant disappearances, mock executions, anal penetration performed under cover of “rehydration” and at least one man who froze to death, according to a landmark Senate report last year. Versions of the techniques migrated from the CIA’s undocumented prisons, known as black sites, to US military usage at Guantánamo Bay, Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan and Abu Ghraib in Iraq.

On behalf of torture survivors Suleiman Abdullah Salim and Mohamed Ahmed Ben Soud, as well as a representative of the estate of Gul Rahman – who froze to death in a CIA black site in Afghanistan – the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed the suit against Mitchell and Jessen on Tuesday in a federal court in Washington state, where the two currently reside. They seek compensatory damages of at least $75,000.

The suit calls the torture program a “joint criminal enterprise” and a “war crime” in which the CIA, Mitchell and Jessen colluded and from which Mitchell and Jessen financially profited.

Although numerous US government investigations have pierced the veneer of secrecy around the torture program, the program’s government architects have faced no legal reprisal. A Justice Department inquiry ended in 2012 without prosecutions. The new lawsuit, aimed not at government officials but the contractors Mitchell and Jessen, aims to break the trend.

This case is about ensuring the people behind the torture program are held accountable so history doesn’t repeat itself

Steven Watt, ACLU attorney

“This case is about ensuring that the people behind the torture program are held accountable so history doesn’t repeat itself,” Steven Watt, one of the ACLU attorneys representing the three ex-detainees, told the Guardian.

“Impunity for torture sends the dangerous message to US and foreign officials that there will be no consequences for future abuses.

“This lawsuit is different from past ones because public government documents now provide exhaustive details on the CIA torture program, and they identify the people who were tortured and how it happened. The government has long abused the ‘state secrets’ privilege to prevent accountability for torture but at this stage, any claim that the torture of our clients is a state secret would be absurd.”

One of the litigants reacted to his torture by attempting to kill himself. Another was kept naked for “more than a month”, the suit alleges, and was subjected to “a form of waterboarding”.

Salim, a Tanzanian fisherman, said in a video published by the Guardian that flashbacks from his ordeal in CIA custody are a permanent part of his life. After five years in CIA and then US military custody, Salim’s captors released him unceremoniously from Bagram in August 2008, presenting him with a memo stating that the US determined him not to pose a threat to the US.

“You can’t sleep, you can’t eat, you can’t smell,” said Salim, who says his CIA captors chained his arms and legs to a metal hoop in his cell that forced him into a squatting position so uncomfortable it prevented him from sleeping. Like other detainees, Salim was doused in ice-cold water and then wrapped in a freezing plastic sheet. According to the lawsuit, Salim hid painkillers he was given in order to hoard a dose strong enough for an ultimately unsuccessful suicide attempt.

“Flashbacks come anytime, so much they make you crazy,” Salim said in the video.

Flashbacks come anytime, so much they make you crazy

Salim, a Tanzanian fisherman

Ben Soud, who now lives in his native Libya, was taken to a CIA black site in Afghanistan, and for extended periods permitted “sleep only for minutes at a time because of painful stress positions, constant blaring music, and guards banging loudly on the door of his cell every hour or so”, the suit claims. Guards paraded him naked around the black site for “15 minutes every half hour through the night and into the morning”, according to the Senate report.

Although the CIA only acknowledges waterboarding three detainees – Abu Zubaydah, Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and Abdul al-Rahim al-Nashiri – the lawsuit claims the agency subjected Ben Soud to a “form of waterboarding”.

“He was strapped to a wooden board that could spin around 360 degrees,” the suit claims.

“His interrogators spun him around on this board with a hood over his head covering his nose and mouth. While strapped to the board with his head lower than his feet, his interrogators poured buckets of cold water him. While they did not pour water directly over his mouth and nose, they threatened to do so if he didn’t cooperate.”

Ben Soud was also treated with the same frigid-water dousing and plastic-sheet coating that Salim received, only Ben Soud reported the freezing water being treated with a gel-like substance, causing it to stick to his body.

Famously, Jessen and Mitchell, former instructors in the military’s Survival Evasion Resistance Escape (SERE) program to counter torture, revised torture techniques from the SERE training and proposed to use them on CIA detainees.

They faced their first test case in the spring of 2002, after the CIA captured Abu Zubaydah, then thought to be a senior member of al-Qaida, and took him to Thailand. Although Zubaydah spoke openly with his FBI interrogators who sought to establish a rapport with him, Mitchell cabled the CIA’s Counterrorism Center “nearly every day” for permission to torture him.

CIA personnel, with Mitchell overseeing, waterboarded Zubaydah 83 times in the span of a month. Eventually, according to the Senate intelligence committee’s report – which gives Mitchell and Jessen the pseudonyms Grayson Swigert and Hammond Dunbar – Zubaydah would submit to torture after hearing his captors snap their fingers twice. They forced him into “confinement boxes”, one the size of a coffin and the other just two and a half feet square and 21 inches deep.

Now missing an eye, Zubaydah is still detained at Guantánamo Bay, although the CIA no longer believes he is a member of al-Qaida. The Senate intelligence committee concluded the torture techniques did not produce any useful intelligence; the CIA’s official position as of 2014 is that the question is unanswerable. But the 2002 test case convinced the CIA, supported by the Bush White House, of the value of torture.

The torture of Abu Zubaydah, who is not a party to the lawsuit, began weeks before the US Justice Department provided its August 2002 legal blessing, since withdrawn, to the CIA torture program. An adviser to Condoleezza Rice would later inform the Bush-era secretary of state that use of the techniques Mitchell and Jessen implemented amounted to a “felony war crime”.

A Spokane-based company the two founded, Mitchell and Jessen Associates, would secure $75m from the CIA in contracts, in addition to a further $6.1m from the agency for legal expenses in the event of criminal or civil action stemming from the contract. Although Barack Obama banned CIA torture by executive order on the second day of his presidency, the CIA continued to cover the company’s legal bills until 2012. Mitchell and Jessen themselves each received more than $1m from their contracts.

The suit does not claim that Mitchell and Jessen were present during the torture of Salim, Ben Soud and Rahman. But it derives their culpability through the application of the torture techniques – prolonged sleep deprivation, nudity, “stress positions”, cramped confinement – that the two psychologists provided to the CIA, which implemented the techniques.

“Defendants are directly liable,” the suit charges, “because they designed, developed, and implemented a program for the CIA intended to inflict physical and mental pain and suffering on Plaintiffs, and because Plaintiffs were tortured and subjected to cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment as a consequence of their inclusion in that program.”

Read more…

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3264166/The-drone-death-ray-knock-UAVs-mile-away-using-radio-waves.html

The 'death ray' that can knock out drones from up to a mile away using radio waves

  • Technology developed by three British firms to combat rising drone threat
  • Now being sold in the US and targeted at airports and homeland security
  • Boeing and others developing laser weapons to knock out drones 
  • System also being tested by security forces in the UK 

It could be the answer to the rising threat of drones - a 'death ray' that uses radio waves to disable them from up to a mile away.

The system is being shown off in Las Vegas amid growing concern over the threat from unmanned vehicles. 

It uses high powered radio waves to disable drones, effectively blocking their communication and switching them off in midair.

Scroll down for video 

The AUDS system uses high powered 'RF inhibitor' to create radio waves to disable drones, effectively blocking their communication and switching them off in midair.

The AUDS system uses high powered 'RF inhibitor' to create radio waves to disable drones, effectively blocking their communication and switching them off in midair.

HOW IT WORKS 

The Blighter AUDS system combines electronic scanning radar target detection, electro-optical tracking/classification and directional RF inhibition capability.

It uses a  high powered 'RF inhibitor' to create radio waves to disable drones, effectively blocking their communication and switching them off in midair. 

'If I can see it, I can kill it,' said Rick Sondag, executive vice-president of Liteye Systems, which sells the device, and who debuted it at the Commercial Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Expo in Las Vegas this week, according to the Guardian

Liteye, based in Colorado, was named distributor in the US and Canada for the device earlier this year by its three manufacturers: Enterprise, Chess Systems and Blighter.

Sondaq hopes to sell the system to airports and other places where national security is an issue. 

'The US government, like everyone else, has critical infrastructure and if they don't feel like they can protect it, they'll pass laws that will hamper progress and hamper current use,' Sondag said.

'The system may be used in remote or urban areas to prevent UAVs being used for terrorist attacks, espionage or other undesirable activities against sites with critical infrastructure,' the firms say.

'The Anti-UAV Defence System is likely to be an integral part of a wider networked surveillance and defence system. 

'Its soft kill capabilities make it a very attractive option for both military, internal and border security forces. 

The Blighter AUDS system combines electronic scanning radar target detection, electro-optical tracking/classification and directional RF inhibition capability. 

The Blighter AUDS system combines electronic scanning radar target detection, electro-optical tracking/classification and directional RF inhibition capability. 

The system is portable and can be easily erected in minutes.

The system is portable and can be easily erected in minutes.

'Where the situation demands restraint under provocation and where active, yet discrete, deterrence is required, AUDS delivers a very powerful message.'

Defences sources confirmed last month the British-designed system called AUDS – Anti Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Defence System – was trialled in Scotland earlier this year and proved effective against remote-controlled drones and autonomous drones which follow pre- programmed flight paths.

The manufacturers of AUDS claim it takes between 10 and 15 seconds to target and disrupt multiple drones being flown in a ‘swarm attack’. 

The technology has been designed to intercept civilian grade mini-drones and would not affect commercial or military aircraft, which use encrypted communications.

The MoD and the Civil Aviation Authority have been alerted to the threat following several reports of drones being flown over nuclear power stations and military bases in France. 

Last night military expert Elizabeth Quintana, from the Royal United Services Institute, said: ‘There have been a number of dangerous or suspicious incidents involving drones in restricted airspace. With the proliferation of drones, these problems are likely to increase in frequency.

‘The Government and Civil Aviation Authority are looking into a variety of measures to mitigate these incidents which involve both technical solutions to spot the drones and deny access and also law enforcement options.’ 

Talking about the trial of the new equipment, a defence spokesman added: ‘The MoD regularly invites industry to demonstrate capabilities they are developing. 

The Compact Laser Weapon System can be assembled in 15 minutes, and then destroy targets from up to 22 miles away with an an energy beam of up to 10 kilowatts.

The Compact Laser Weapon System can be assembled in 15 minutes, and then destroy targets from up to 22 miles away with an an energy beam of up to 10 kilowatts.

WHAT BOEING'S LASER CAN DO

LWS is designed specifically to track and attack moving aerial targets such as incoming artillery rounds, and low-flying aircraft and unmanned aerial vehicles.

The weapon can be be assembled in just 15 minutes, LWS is capable of generating an energy beam of up to 2 kilowatts.

Depending on the power level, be used to acquire, track, and identify a target - or even destroy it - at ranges of at least 22 miles.

'These informal open events help build our understanding of future technology.

Several firms are developing rival systems.

Boeing recently revealed a radical new laser weapon small enough to fit into a suitcase - but poweful enough to blast a drone out of the sky.

The company's new Compact Laser Weapon System (LWS) breaks down into four parts, each transportable by one or two Marines.

It can be assembled in 15 minutes, and then destroy targets from up to 22 miles away with an an energy beam of up to 10 kilowatts.

'Silent, invisible and precise—Boeing's Compact Laser Weapons System harnesses directed energy on its targets,' the firm boasts.

The system recently reached a milestone at an exercise at Point Mugu, Calif. by tracking and disabling a moving, untethered unmanned aerial vehicle.

It works by focussing a laser. 

'Think of it like a welding torch being put on a target - but from hundreds of metres away,' said Isaac Neil of Boeing. 

'Once we turned the laser on, it was about 15 seconds until the drone was disabled.

If you were on the receiving end, you'd have no idea where it was coming from or what was happening.'

The weapons is a much smaller, significantly more portable version of the High Energy Laser Mobile Demonstrator (HEL MD) Boeing revealed last year. 

 The weapon can be be assembled in just 15 minutes, LWS is capable of generating an energy beam of up to 10 kilowatts that can, depending on the power level, be used to acquire, track, and identify a target - or even destroy it - at ranges of at least 22 miles.

It is designed specifically to track and attack moving aerial targets such as incoming artillery rounds, and low-flying aircraft and unmanned aerial vehicles.

U.S. Special Operations forces are currently testing LWS, with 'multiple' branches of the U.S. military expressing interest.

Read more…

http://www.activistpost.com/2015/09/electronic-drone-warfare.html

Electronic Warfare Expected in New World of Drones and Anti-Drones

electromagnetic warfareBy Nicholas West

As the global drone arms race continues to expand, so do the counter measures.

The proliferation of commercial drones, in particular, is expected to present new challenges to an increasingly crowded sky. Among commercial and military drones is the potential for swarms of micro-drones that can be hidden in plain sight … at least to the naked eye. However, drones are never hidden from the electromagnetic spectrum.

A UK defense firm announced that it is working on a comprehensive defense shield that aims to “control the electromagnetic spectrum”  – electronic warfare. It will not only identify drones that are a threat either to populations or critical infrastructure such as nuclear facilities, military installations, and seats of government, but also will have the ability to hijack the aircraft and remove it from the area.

Selex ES is calling its system Falcon Shield, highlighted in a recent press release:

Easy to make, cheap to buy, simple to fly and hard to detect, commercially available drones are one of the most quickly evolving technological threats to both military and civilian environments. In response to this threat, Finmeccanica – Selex ES has introduced Falcon Shield, which can provide users with a rapidly deployable, scalable and modular system to detect, disrupt, deny and defeat the potential threat.

Source

As is the case with nearly all press releases of this type, the bulk of it reads as a sales pitch to its potential military customers, obviously touting its many technical solutions-based elements. However, it does indicate the general direction of drone warfare.

As nation after nation becomes wired for war and neutralizes then surpasses each other, new methods must be developed to maintain military supremacy. This is the nature of military conflict and one of the prime reasons why the world seems to have new security threats each and every day. It becomes one endless problem-reaction-solution loop that only serves to benefit those who are invested in each of the three components.

This little device delivers turnkey Internet privacy and security (Ad)

At the same time this “solution” is presented – which really only elevates all threats to a new level – a counter measure is already in development. The latest cloaking technology is expected to render drones completely invisible – not only to the naked eye, but also in the electromagnetic spectrum:

By scattering the electromagnetic radiation – in the visible, infrared or radar spectrum, such metamaterial will be able to render a coated object undetectable in these wave frequencies, by forcing light or radar waves to bypass the object surface through the coating, which effectively “cloaks” the object.

Source

Evidently it continues to be a great time to be in the business of war.

falcon_shieldHat tip: Zen Gardner and Sputnik News

Nicholas West writes for ActivistPost.com and TechSwarm.com

Read more…

Are you thinking what I’m thinking? The rise of mind control

http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/aug/22/mind-control-are-you-thinking-what-im-thinking

Are you thinking what I’m thinking? The rise of mind control

Mind control still sounds like the stuff of sci-fi movies. But it’s coming closer, with implants that can help people with paralysis and, further off, devices to send thoughts between humans

Tom Ireland tries out transcranial magnetic stimulation at the Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University. Tom Ireland tries out transcranial magnetic stimulation at the Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University. Photograph: Gary Calton for the Observer

Ahundred electrodes are pressed tightly against my scalp and a mixture of salt water and baby shampoo is dripping down my back. The goings-on in my slightly agitated brain are represented by a baffling array of graphs on a screen in front of me. When I close my eyes and relax, the messy spikes and troughs become neat little waves.

Next, scientists here at Newcastle University’s Institute of Neuroscience induce small electric currents in different parts of my head, using a technique called transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). If they fire the device a few millimetres to the left of my brain’s motor cortex, I feel nothing. Hit my “sweet spot”, however, and my arm moves of its own accord.

I’m here for a demonstration of the tools underpinning what many call “mind control” technology. Neuroscientists believe it will soon be possible for humans to control robotic avatars using the power of thought alone, or even to send thoughts or intentions from one person’s mind directly into another – a terrifying prospect for fans of cult sci-fi films such as Scanners, where society is controlled by an elite force with mind control and telepathic powers.

Some even think that people will one day connect their brains together, via the internet, to form an enormous collective super-brain.

Here in Newcastle, researchers hope such technology can be used to restore movement to people affected by paralysis or disability. In another demonstration, electrodes detect the storm of electrical activity coming from my brain down to the nerves and muscles of my arm as I move my fingers. I hear the crackle of individual motor units in my hand muscles firing, amplified through hissing speakers.

The team here are using such signals to help people control robotic limbs, or reroute nerve impulses back into the body to bypass damaged nerves. Such devices are known as brain-computer interfaces, or BCIs, and have developed rapidly over the last decade.

Internationally, neuroscientists have gone a step further, sending information from one brain into the another to create a brain-to-brain interface, or BBI. Researchers have even made one person move when another person wants them to, all by connecting their brains.

Greg Gage demonstrates the new ‘human to human’ interface.

“Mind control” is suddenly not just plausible, but actually rather easy. You can buy a “DIY human-human interface” online for just over £165, part of a project aiming to make neuroscience more accessible to young people. In one video by neuroscientist Greg Gage, two on-stage volunteers are connected to the device – little more than a few wires, some flashing circuitry and a laptop. When one subject curls their arm, the other is powerless to stop their arm curling too.

“When you lose your free will and someone else becomes your agent, it does feel a bit strange,” Gage says to his young volunteers.

At the cutting edge of this technology, things get a little weirder. In 2013 researchers from Harvard Medical School announced they had made a device that allowed a human volunteer to move a rat’s tail via thought alone. That same year, neuroscientists from the University of Washington sent brain signals via the internet from one individual wearing an electroencephalography (EEG) headset to another with a TMS device, remotely controlling the recipient’s hand movements. One person, watching a computer game, imagined moving their hand to shoot down an enemy missile. His thoughts stimulated another person’s finger to hit the trigger at the appropriate time.

Then there’s the paralysed teenager who kicked the first ball of last year’s Fifa World Cup opening ceremony, wearing an exoskeleton controlled by his mind. And scientists at the Starlab facility in Barcelona, who claim to have demonstrated “conscious transmission of information” – sending the word “hola” from one mind to another, without either person using their senses.

Such experiments understandably make many people feel uneasy. Rumours that the US military is funding research in this area only add to concerns about frightening potential uses. Could people be forced to move or act against their will, or have their innermost thoughts and feelings extracted from their head?

0:00
/
0:00
The video could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Pinterest
The robotic exoskeleton used at the 2014 World Cup opening ceremony.

The answer, at the moment, is almost certainly no. Even the most seemingly profound experiments can be a little underwhelming when looked at in detail. The Barcelona experiment, for example, might sound as if one person thought “hola” and the recipient then heard the word as an inner voice in their head. The reality is very different: the “sender” spelled out the word in binary code by imagining moving their hands or feet – one movement meant “0”, the other meant “1”. The “receiver” then received two types of brain stimulation: one, which caused them to perceive flashes of light, represented the 1s, another pulse with no effect represented the 0s. So, really, one person spelled out a word by thinking about moving, and one person got a kind of futuristic Morse code blasted into their head. Impressive, but hardly The Matrix.

The problem is, brain-to-brain technology in humans is currently restricted to non-invasive technologies, such as the slimy EEG device that is draped over my head in Newcastle. From outside the skull, such devices can only detect flurries of activity in the outer parts of the brain, or large spikes of activity deep in the brain.

“Reading brain activity with EEG is like trying to follow a football match while stood outside the stadium,” says Dr Andrew Jackson, senior research fellow at the Newcastle institute. “You can tell when someone’s scored a goal. But that’s about it.”

Activity associated with movement is one of the easiest types of brain activity to detect and reproduce. Capturing thoughts and feelings, which involve highly specific, synchronised activity, is something very different.

Sending sensations into the receiver’s brain is even less precise. Transcranial magnetic stimulation, the device used to make my arm twitch, can induce electric currents in extremely precise areas of the brain, activating neurons only in those areas. But again, creating complex sensations such as words and thoughts is far beyond the current scope of these devices.

Jackson says: “On the whole the technology [for sending signals] is less precise than the technology we have for recording – it is hard to control where you are stimulating. And we don’t really know much about the language of brain function – we don’t know what sensation will be created by stimulating different areas.”

Giulio Ruffini, who helped to devise the “hola” experiment, says the transmission of real thoughts or messages, rather than a sequence of 0s and 1s, is probably only likely with invasive technology – the implantation of devices directly into the brain.

“It is a far more interesting goal – the brain perceives something and you stimulate that exact experience in someone else. It has been demonstrated with invasive technologies in animals, and I believe it will be done in humans soon too.”

Such implants contain hundreds of minute needle-like electrodes, placed in precise locations in the brain to monitor or stimulate individual neurons. Researchers this year connected the brains of three monkeys using invasive technology, and found the animals quickly learned to synchronise brain activity to collaborate in tasks. In a similar experiment, four rats connected with intra-cortical devices were able to perform tasks to a higher level than single animals.

Ruffini is excited about what implants could achieve in humans. “It is so much more powerful. Already you can connect humans to an interface that controls a robot which you use to grab things. If we establish links between brains that are powerful enough, could those people actually be thought of as one and the same person? Could we even communicate with other species?”

Miguel Nicolelis, a pioneer in the field, says that if invasive technology was deemed safe and ethically permissible, “doing something like controlling a car with your thoughts would be fairly trivial”. In his book Beyond Boundaries, Nicolelis envisages a future where people “download their ancestral memory bank” or “experience the sensations of touching the surface of another planet without leaving your living room”. On the phone, however, he is more pragmatic. “Higher order brain functions are not available to be transmitted. If it cannot be reduced to a channel, it cannot be transmitted.”

Like Nicolelis, many working in this field like to entertain all hypothetical possibilities, despite the technology’s limitations and the complexity of the brain. Tellingly, when the UK’s scientific ethics committee looked into emerging “neurotechnologies”, such as BCIs and BBIs, they decided the discrepancy between what might be done and what is actually possible was so large that there is no need for any regulatory action for now.

Commercial attempts to create mind-reading EEG gadgets have largely been gimmicks, and when I try the £165 DIY human-human interface from the videos, I seem to just give my friends electric shocks. It all adds up to a confusing mixture of genuinely brilliant science and speculative hype.

“With some experiments I’ve seen I’m not quite sure what the point is, other than to be the first person to do it,” admits Jackson.

Nonetheless, invasive devices are likely to be coming to a hospital near you, and soon. “Invasive technologies are actually more desirable for a patient who is missing a limb or is paralysed,” says Jackson. “They might not want to have to wear something on their head, they might want something permanent and incorporated into their body.” As I remove this summer’s least sought-after headwear from my poor head, I see his point. The challenge now is creating safe implants that can function beneath the skin for decades.

Others, including Ruffini, remain convinced that humans will be able to link brains more meaningfully, perhaps wirelessly, within this century.

“Humans need to communicate. We have always tried to widen the bandwidth with which we can do it – with language or letter, phone or internet. It may take 50 or 100 years before we are communicating thoughts, but I think it is inevitable.”

Non-invasive brain-to-brain interfaces

■ Activity in the brain is detected by a device held on the scalp, such as electroencephalography (EEG). This gives an indication of patterns of neural activity, mainly in areas of the outer brain.

■ The data is amplified, processed, and analysed by a computer, and converted to a signal that can be transmitted into another brain.

■ Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) uses a magnetic field to induce electric current in areas of the brain, stimulating neurons to “fire”. The sensations that can be created by sending impulses into the brain in this way are extremely limited, eg muscle movements or the perception of flashes of light.

Invasive brain-to-brain interfaces

■ A special chip containing tiny, needle-like electrodes is inserted into the brain and fixed to the skull. Electrodes can be placed with enough precision to measure the activity of individual neurons.

■ Activity is detected, processed and analysed by a computer.

■ Electrodes can be placed to stimulate precise areas of the brain. Though more precise than TMS, stimulating complex effects like thoughts or controlled movements is still not yet possible.

Read more…

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3190243/WMD-Britain-MoD-scientists-tested-chemical-weapons-including-anthrax-PLAGUE-soldiers-members-public-released-dangerous-bacteria-Tube.html

WMD Britain: How MoD scientists tested chemical weapons including anthrax and the PLAGUE on soldiers and members of the public - and even released dangerous bacteria on the Tube

  • Scientists experimented on 21,000 servicemen between 1939 and 1989
  • New book reveals horrors of unwitting Ministry of Defence test subjects 
  • 'Plague-like' bacteria spores were even released on London Underground
  • Volunteers suffered agonising chemical burns, breakdowns and even death

The gruesome reality of chemical experiments carried out by the Ministry of Defence at a controversial 'military science park' over the course of 50 years has been revealed.

Teenager soldiers and servicemen unwittingly volunteered to be human 'guinea pigs' for a series of experiments at Porton Down, in Wiltshire, in the hope of a bit of extra cash.

But the unsuspecting volunteers were exposed to Sarin gas, anthrax and even the Black Death, a new book has revealed. 

One victim was left convulsing with ‘terrible stuff coming out of his mouth like frogspawn’; another teenage serviceman believed he had a four-hour conversation with a school-friend who had died years before, after being injected with a brain-incapacitating drug.

Incredibly, thousands of members of the British public were also unknowingly exposed by government scientists who released spores of a 'plague-like' bacteria on the London Underground in 1963.

Eerie: Volunteers line up to be experimented on at 'military science park' Porton Down, in Wiltshire. Scientists exposed volunteers to potentially dangerous gases to measure how much was absorbed by the masks

Eerie: Volunteers line up to be experimented on at 'military science park' Porton Down, in Wiltshire. Scientists exposed volunteers to potentially dangerous gases to measure how much was absorbed by the masks

Controversial: Protesters outside Porton Down, in Wiltshire, where the Ministry of Defence carried out chemical and biological experiments on 21,000 servicemen between 1939 and 1989

Controversial: Protesters outside Porton Down, in Wiltshire, where the Ministry of Defence carried out chemical and biological experiments on 21,000 servicemen between 1939 and 1989

Although considered harmless at the time Bacillus globigii - or BG to use its military moniker - can in fact cause food poisoning, eye infections, and even potentially deadly septicaemia. 

But none of the London commuters were ever told of the experiment.

Scientists at Porton Down assured their thousands of military volunteers that they were 'totally safe' before exposing them to a series of dangerous experiments.

Despite being turned into ‘guinea pigs’ by their own government, 21,000 servicemen between 1939 and 1989 were only offered token payments, a day off, or even just a free bus pass. 

Decades later, in 2008, the government finally apologised for the atrocities that had been carried out on human ‘guinea pigs’ and paid compensation to 670 of the victims. 

Historian Ulf Schmidt, a leading academic of modern history at the University of Kent, has revealed exactly what the shocking experiments entailed and the horrific effects they had on their ‘participants’.   

The historian, who acted as an expert witness in the Porton Down investigation, has revealed his findings in a new book 'Secret Science: A Century of Poison Warfare and Human Experiments.

Here are some of the most disturbing case studies he has revealed. 

 

Many thousands of Londoners were put at considerable risk by the Ministry of Defence experimentation.

On July 26, 1963, a harmful virus was unleashed on the London Underground.

Spores of the virus Bacillus globigii were released at Colliers Wood, in a tiny box disguised as a make-up compact.

Bacteria spores were unleashed at Colliers Wood, in a box disguised as a make-up compact
Unknowing test subjects: On July 26, 1963, scientists released spores of the harmful virus Bacillus globigii on the London Underground

Unknowing test subjects: On July 26, 1963, scientists released spores of the harmful virus Bacillus globigii on the London Underground (right) to test how anthrax spores would travel. The spores were unleashed at Colliers Wood, in a box disguised as a make-up compact (left)

Scientists were trying to discover whether ‘long distance travel of aerosols’ on London’s transport network ‘was due to transportation within trains’ or through the air ventilation systems.

The virus, although considered harmless at the time, has since been proved to cause food poisoning, eye infections and even potentially-deadly septicaemia.

But none of the commuters dusted with the spores were ever warned or contacted afterwards.

Government officials decided that in order to maintain national security, the trial should be kept under wraps. 

 
'Guinea pig': RAF engineer Ronald Maddison, 20, unwittingly volunteered to be exposed to Sarin gas, a deadly nerve agent now classified by the UN as a weapon of mass destruction. He died in May 1953

'Guinea pig': RAF engineer Ronald Maddison, 20, unwittingly volunteered to be exposed to Sarin gas, a deadly nerve agent now classified by the UN as a weapon of mass destruction. He died in May 1953

Ronald Maddison, an RAF engineer from Co Durham, was just 20 when he signed up for one of the hundreds of experiments carried out at the ‘military science park’ of Porton Down, in May 1953.

Assured that he was in no danger, he was guided into a gas chamber with five other test subjects, dressed in oversized overalls, woollen hats and respirators for protection.

Scientists applied twenty drops of liquid to two layers of cloth used in uniforms, serge and flannel, which had been taped to the inside of his forearm.

Just hours later the hapless volunteer was dead, the victim of the most severe case of nerve gas poisoning ever recorded in the western world.

He had been exposed to Sarin, a deadly nerve agent that is now classified by the UN as a weapon of mass destruction.

Ambulance driver Alfred Thornhill, who was 19 years old at the time of Maddison’s death, spoke as an eyewitness at the inquest into his death.

‘I had never seen anyone die before and what that lad went through was absolutely horrific,’ he told the inquest.

‘It was like he was being electrocuted, his whole body was convulsing.

‘The skin was vibrating and there was all this terrible stuff coming out of his mouth…it looked like frogspawn.’

He added: ‘I saw his leg rise up from the bed and I saw his skin begin turning blue. It started from the ankle and started spreading up his leg.

‘It was like watching somebody pouring a blue liquid into a glass, it just began filling up.

‘It was like watching something from outer space and then one of the doctors produced the biggest needle I had ever seen.

‘The sister saw me gawping and told me to get out.’

In payment for the trial that killed him, Maddison was offered 15 shillings and three-day leave pass. He had planned to use the money to buy an engagement ring for his girlfriend. 

The British government finally consented to an inquest into his death, half a century after the event.

In 2004 the inquest decided that he had been ‘unlawfully killed’ by his own government, and two years later his family received £100,000 in compensation.  

MP John Glen questions the Prime Minister on Porton Down
2B34ADE800000578-0-image-a-5_1439045685069.jpg
 
Unwitting volunteers: The chemistry laboratory at 'military science park' Porton Down, in Wiltshire. An total of 21,000 servicemen volunteered to take part in experiments between 1939 and 1989, designed to test chemical and biological weapons capabilities

Unwitting volunteers: The chemistry laboratory at 'military science park' Porton Down, in Wiltshire. An total of 21,000 servicemen volunteered to take part in experiments between 1939 and 1989, designed to test chemical and biological weapons capabilities

Airman Richard Skinner, a 19-year-old from Aberdeenshire, arrived at Porton in mid-1972 in the hope of earning some extra cash.

He volunteered himself for what was then described as a ‘mild dose of anaesthetic’.

He was actually injected with the new drug T3436, which had been designed as a means to incapacitate the human brain.

At a hearing, 30 years later, he described how his only hazy recollection of the experiment was a long conversation with a dead school-friend.

In video footage of the experiment, the young Skinner can be seen talking to a fire extinguisher for more than four hours.

He is, to this day, convinced that the mind-altering experiment fundamentally changed his personality. 

 

Thousands of servicemen were locked into gas chambers pumped full of potentially lethal toxins, in a series of experiments designed to test protective clothing carried out over the decades.

In one of these life-threatening experiments, in March 1943, six servicemen were exposed to nitrogen vapour for an hour a day for up to five consecutive days.

But all six volunteers had to be removed from the test, after suffering agonising chemical burns to their armpits, scrotums and scalps.

A 20-year-old corporal, Harry Hogg, was one of those exposed to the poisonous gas.

He later spoke out about his experience in the chamber.

Gruesome: Scientists at Porton Down ushered thousands of servicemen into gas chambers pumped full of potentially lethal toxins over the decades, to test protective clothing

Gruesome: Scientists at Porton Down ushered thousands of servicemen into gas chambers pumped full of potentially lethal toxins over the decades, to test protective clothing

‘It seemed like an eternity. They opened the door and we all piled out on hands and knees, groaning and moaning and crying… one man was just like an animal.

‘He was trying to eat grass. He was out of his mind. What we went through was horrendous.’

In 1944, a Porton Down report insisted that most of those involved in the experiment enjoyed their experience.

In February 1995, Labour politician Rachel Squire demanded that the Ministry of Defence investigate Harry Hogg’s case specifically, as Porton Down bosses tried to deny that he was ever there.  

 

Anthrax was also a key feature of Porton Down experiments, as scientists investigated its capabilities for biological warfare, along with venereal diseases and the bubonic plague.

Porton Down scientists launched Operation Cauldron in 1952, to test the potential of the bubonic plague as a weapon.

The trial took place in the Outer Hebrides, aboard the HMS Ben Lomond.

Trial-run: Scientists investigated the bubonic plague as a biological weapon, aboard the HMS Ben Lomond (pictured) in the Outer Hebrides in 1952, as part of Operation Cauldron

Trial-run: Scientists investigated the bubonic plague as a biological weapon, aboard the HMS Ben Lomond (pictured) in the Outer Hebrides in 1952, as part of Operation Cauldron

But in an unexpected twist the trawler Carella, with 18 people aboard, strayed into the test area.

Rather than warn or offer treatment to those aboard, researchers were ordered to track the trawler as it continued on its course to Iceland, to monitor what happened.

Incredibly, the crew were even allowed to dock for a few days at Blackpool, with no regard for public safety.

If any of the crew members became sick, medical officers had been instructed to diagnose pneumonia.

Luckily, no crew members or members of the public reported any illness, and those involved in the operation were ordered to burn all records of their communications.

Read more…

Pentagon Employing Top Scientists to Improve US Propaganda Machine

http://theantimedia.org/pentagon-employing-top-scientists-to-improve-us-propaganda-machine/

(ANTIMEDIA) Throughout human history, governments have been interested in “mastering the human domain”—in fully understanding how to control the minds of their populations. In 2015, DARPA’s Narrative Networks” ( or N2) program is in full swing.

The project is intended to analyze how “narratives” play into human psychology, delving into the way these constructs affect the mind. A narrative is a way of phrasing something, a choice of words, for example, that is likely a biased strategy to frame information.

“Narratives exert a powerful influence on human thoughts, emotions and behavior and can be particularly important in security contexts,” DARPA researchers said in a paper published in the Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

They discussed “…conflict resolution and counterterrorism scenarios [and] detecting the neural response underlying empathy induced by stories is of critical importance.”

Mastery of “narratives” could potentially be used to manipulate the perception of a population using platforms of communication like television to subtly and potently make a person think a certain way. Many people know this tactic by a more familiar term: propaganda.

“Governments often use stories to present information, so understanding how we comprehend them is important,” said co-author Eric Schumacher, an associate professor of psychology at the Georgia Institute of Technology.

In addition to narratives, the study focused on fear. Researchers observed a phenomenon of “tunnel vision,” or impaired reasoning, triggered in the brain when suspects processed, for example, a suspenseful moment in a movie.

As the Washington Post summarized,

“When suspense grew, brain activity in viewers’ peripheral vision decreased. Schumacher called it the ‘neural signature of tunnel vision.’ Moments of increasing suspense were also associated with greater interference with a secondary task. In this case, responding by pressing a button when hearing a tone.”

It is likely that predatory actions of war could come out of this particular accumulation of knowledge.  The U.S. Military has a long history of funding psychological experiments, some entrenched in human rights violations (like the experiments performed during the Project MKUltra era).

Now we have the Pentagon-funded DARPA program, which pays researchers at colleges and other scientists millions of dollars to enhance and bolster methods of war. Such work places great technological power in the hands of a demonstrably criminal government and military.

DARPA paying geniuses to work for them could be considered an exploitation of intellectual capability to further consolidate government and military power.

This is but a sliver of information in the full timeline of the U.S. Military’s acquisition of propaganda techniques, but even that smallest sliver of information is a necessary piece of the puzzle.


This article (Pentagon Employing Top Scientists to Improve US Propaganda Machine) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Cassius Methyl and theAntiMedia.org. Anti-Media Radio airs weeknights at 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. If you spot a typo, email edits@theantimedia.org.

Cassius Methyl joined Anti-Media as an independent journalist in March of 2014. His topics of interest include thinking, creating a future, deep spirituality, and astrology. He resides in Sacramento, California. Learn more about Methyl here!

Read more…

Futurist Suggests Replacing Death Penalty With Brain Implants That Control Prisoners’ Mind, Behaviour

http://www.ibtimes.com.au/futurist-suggests-replacing-death-penalty-brain-implants-control-prisoners-mind-behaviour-1457786

Futurist Suggests Replacing Death Penalty With Brain Implants That Control Prisoners’ Mind, Behaviour

By Darwin Malicdem on July 27 2015 10:18 PM
Brain Implant
Graham Sandercock, who suffers from Parkinson's disease, holds up a new implant which blocks signals in the brain responsible for the major symptoms of the disease May 20. The device is implanted in the chest wall and is heralded as the biggest breakthrough in controlling the disease for thirty years. Reuters

Brain implants able to manage out-of-control tempers and violent actions of prisons were suggested to minimise crime rates in the United States and as alternative for death penalty, according to Zoltan Istvan. The futurist and presidential candidate for the Transhumanist Party, Istvan suggested that the technology could be a near-term alternative for criminals on death row and might be considered sufficient punishment.

"Violent crime is a version of mental disease," Istvan stated in an article published in Motherboard, suggesting conducting brain alterations to prisoners could change behaviour and attitudes of criminals into decent members of society.  The brain implants would work as a surveillance device that could monitor or possibly control each action of the prisoner with a tranquiliser triggered if violent behaviour is reported or attempted by the inmate.

Trauma alert implant should also be in the brain of citizens, a device that sends signal to alert authorities directly from the brain if someone is experiencing trouble or trauma, he proposed. The surveillance enhancement would reduce criminal rates rapidly in the future, Istvan said.

"If people knew they were going to be caught, crime would drop noticeably … violent criminals will be caught far more frequently than now, especially if we have some type of trauma alert implant in people," he said.

Istvan said that a commercialised device called Thync, a wearable that calms or energises people in minutes, is one of the technological advances that brought the idea of brain implant. The futurist cited thousands of people already have implants in their heads for health solutions, particularly to treat deafness, and help people with Alzheimer's or epilepsy. Istvan added many criminals were also given powerful drugs that changed their mood and attitude.

"So the technology to change behaviour and alter the brain isn't science fiction," he stated. The article indicated that U.S. President Barack Obama's brain initiative focused to treat the involuntary movements associated with Parkinson's disease and improving deep brain stimulation or by developing new technology.

With the suggestions of Istvan, Amanda Pustilnik, a professor at the University of Maryland law school and a senior fellow for law and applied neuroscience at Harvard Law School, told Popular Science, "the story is speculative and interesting, but it gets a bunch of things wrong" on his thoughts and assumptions.

The professor explained that Istvan misunderstood the purpose of death penalty on his concept. The death penalty in the US, according to Pustilnik, exists as the "ultimate punishment" for acted crimes beyond the social contract that it can't be forgiven. "And maybe if those devices work the way the article hypothesizes, the social norms about punishment will change and it won't be so retributive," she said.

"Because I want to believe in the good of human beings, and I also think all human existence has some value, I'm on the lookout for ways to preserve life and maximize its usefulness in society," Istvan stated.

A study titled When "Altering Brain Function" Becomes "Mind Control," published in 2014, found deep brain stimulation, or DBS, technology on treating psychiatric illness can cause actual mind control. The researchers found clinicians were allowed to alter the functions of targeted brain regions, in a reversible manner, with the intent of correcting diseases of the mind, such as depression, addiction, anorexia nervosa, dementia and obsessive compulsive disorder.

The DBS, as the study suggests, is not concern directly with mind control; however, if not properly managed, patients can be victims of mind control even without malice on the part of the person doing the alteration, especially in the case of unexpected treatment of psychiatric illnesses.

To contact the writer, email: darwin.malicdem@ibtimes.tunemedia.biz

Read more…

http://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/report-predicts-drones-and-supersoldiers-are-the-future-of-warfare/story-fnpjxnlk-1227456027308

Report predicts drones and supersoldiers are the future of warfare

HALO might be a pretty accurate description of the future.

HALO might be a pretty accurate description of the future. Source: Supplied

ROBOTS calling the shots in the skies, while technologically advanced supersoldiers patrol the ground — this is the future of warfare according to a new report predicting combat over the coming decades.

The report, Visualizing the Tactical Ground Battlefield in the Year 2050, was the result of a workshop held with leaders from the US Defence Department, Army Research Lab, Institute for Defence Analysis and a select number of academia.

In the world envisioned, armed drones will patrol the skies searching for enemy targets to eliminate.

The use of drones in the current military landscape dictates it is always a human that decides to pull the trigger, but the report suggests soldiers may only have limited control over the smart-robots of the future.

“The difference being that in the former, human decisions are a required step in a process and thus humans are exercising positive control,” the report stated.

“While in the latter, humans can only observe the behaviours that are taking place, but they can only act after the fact or in anticipation of expected behaviours.”

With the large part of the war being fought in the skies, there will be less need for humans on the ground.

However, the humans on the frontline will be far more technologically advanced than those in modern warfare.

“These humans would be physically and mentally augmented with enhanced capabilities that improve their ability to sense their environment, make sense of their environment, and interact with one another,” the report stated.

These drones will hunt by themselves, humans will only act as umpire.

These drones will hunt by themselves, humans will only act as umpire. Source: News Corp Australia

Part of the changes will be providing the technological advancements to enable humans to partner robots.

“These super humans will feature exoskeletons, possess a variety of implants and have seamless access to sensing and cognitive enhancements,” the report said.

“They may also be the result of genetic engineering. The net result is that they will have enhanced physical capabilities, senses, and cognitive powers.

“The presence of super humans on the battlefield in the 2050 time frame is highly likely because the various components needed to enable this development already exist and are undergoing rapid evolution.”

While technology will give soldiers a lethal edge, it could also make them vulnerable to attacks from enemies.

The report envisions enemy forces attempting to monitor the biophysical signals and decision-making abilities of supersoldiers.

Although, it suggests they could do the same to the adversaries.

“In addition to having the information available to vastly improve individual cognitive modelling, such models offer the opportunity to disrupt adversary organisations and operations in a cost-effective manner,” the report stated.

Read more…