peacepink

Worldwide Campaign to stop the Abuse and Torture of Mind Control/DEWs

We should urge government start investigating the abuse and torture of remote electromagnetic mind control technologies from cases which have strong evidences. If government start investigating few cases which have strong evidences, all victims will see the hope that their cases would be investigated soon.

 

My case have strong fact and evidence, we encourage all victims to collect strong facts and evidences. If you have strong facts and evidences, please leave an comments to this discussion.

 

The Fact and evidence of abuses and tortures of mind control technologies:

I was controlled by remote Voice to Skull technologies and Mind Control technologies, and I was brought inside US Embassy in Hong Kong

(http://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/kidnapped-by-mind-control )

 

Psychiatrists are crystal clear about what are organized stalking and non lethal weapons all about. Please see this report from Masters, Clinical Psychology.
http://gangstalkingbelgium.wordpress.com/

 

What constitutes evidence of electronic harassment?

Posted by Jeremy on 6th January 2011  

http://areyoutargeted.com/2011/01/what-constitutes-evidence-of-elec...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In this article:

•An invisible crime, committed at the speed of light

•How helpful are statements from the alleged developers or possessors of electronic harassment technology?

•When measurements are helpful, and when they’re not

•Can you prove that mind-invasive technology is being used against you, and how does that help you?

•On the utility of witnesses

•Conclusions

 

To help targeted individuals complaining about electronic harassment with gathering evidence of what’s happening to them, and to demonstrate to skeptics what a difficult hurdle TI’s face, I’d like to go over what TI’s need to do to make their case in the court of public opinion, or the court of law.

An invisible crime, committed at the speed of light

When a person is shot with a gun, there are mountains of evidence left behind:

 

•the bullet, enabling investigators to narrow down the search for the weapon considerably;

•the entry/exit wounds;

•evidence placing the victim at a specific location when he was shot – blood droplets, footprints, and clothing fibers;

•ballistic evidence, allowing the bullet to be traced back to its source with some reliability;

•evidence left on the bullet itself – barrel markings, DNA of the suspect, and the suspect’s fingerprints (even if they’ve been wiped off1);

•a loud noise, alerting bystanders that a crime has been committed, in real time;

•and more, depending on the circumstances.

However, let’s suppose a person is attacked electromagnetically. What evidence is left behind?

 

•The target’s uncorroborated account of the sensations he felt.

The attack itself is completely silent and invisible. The attacker could be miles away.2 The equipment used is unknown, and effectively untraceable. There might be no visible or identifiable marks on the victim, as emerging nonlethal weapon (NLW) technologies are intended to inflict intolerable pain on a target, rather than damage him.3

 

How helpful are statements from the alleged developers or possessors of electronic harassment technology?

 

Do patents prove anything?

A patent only proves that someone is interested in developing the capabilities described in the patent. Without a working model, it doesn’t prove that the device described actually does what is claimed.

 

In fact, we would expect exactly the opposite; that any U.S. patents pertaining to clandestine technologies targets are complaining about would be dead ends. If they actually described working devices, they would be suppressed under the Invention Secrecy Act of 1951, because of national security concerns.4

 

Does a stated intent to develop capabilities prove anything?

Military agencies regard deception as a tool of warfare, and may arrange the publication of disinformation about future capabilities. It’s best not to read too much into statements regarding hypothesized technological developments. Occasionally, agencies like DARPA or MITRE corporation will publish requests for proposals or speculative strategies for the uses of futuristic technology. These statements may be useful for investigators who are trying to divine the shape of things to come, but aren’t useful for proving capabilities exist.

 

Does a statement or demonstration of capabilities prove anything?

Statements from established, credible sources about their capabilities are generally considered strong evidence. If those sources are caught lying, their credibility is undermined.

 

So a statement of capabilities is very useful in terms of making your case to the general public that a particular device exists and is or will soon be used. A demonstration is proof that it exists and is being used. However:

 

•A demonstration or credible statement of capabilities doesn’t prove that the device in question is being used against you;

•over-using references to these public statements or demonstrations may be portrayed as evidence of “obsession” on the part of a “deluded” writer.

When making your case, image is everything.

 

When measurements are helpful, and when they’re not

Can you measure it?

Measuring equipment that you can afford will, realistically, measure emissions in limited frequency ranges: 1 Hz to 21 Ghz is the maximum range of ‘affordable’ spectrum analyzer equipment as of 2010; RF detectors are much cheaper, but have a more limited range. This is troublesome, because at least one directed-energy weapon on the market (the Active Denial System) operates at a much higher frequency range.

 

For a measuring device to capture an RF signal, not only does the signal have to be in the frequency range that the device will pick up; the signal also has to be long enough in duration for the device to pick up. A military-grade implant might be picking up frequency-hopping signals of very short duration – microseconds or even nanoseconds between hops. A commercial spectrum analyzer wouldn’t be able to capture these signals.

 

Furthermore, an investigator has to be there with measuring equipment when the signal is being transmitted. The harassment might be turned off when the target has arranged for instruments to be present.

 

With obstacles like these, it’s not surprising that many TI’s don’t even try to capture measurements.

 

Are your measurements inaccurate or misleading?

Incorrect alignment of the measuring device, or proximity to large metal objects, can give misleading readings to unsophisticated investigators.5 Also, your detector may be deliberately set off.

 

What have you measured?

If you’ve recorded a signal that coincides with pain or distress, have you determined that a specific person is attempting to harm you?

 

Harm: ANSI has set standards for maximum acceptable levels of short-term microwave exposure; ionizing radiation has well-known lethal dosages; and at least one study shows a very strong correlation between long-term proximity to cell towers and certain kinds of ailments.6 If you can capture signals corresponding to the strength, duration, and radio-frequency of these harmful EM emissions, you know you’re being harmed by those emissions, and you’ll eventually be able to make a good case to the public and to a court.

 

If mind-invasive technology is being used, you need much more personalized evidence of harm. See my remarks in the next section.

 

Specific person: you have to trace the signal back to the source. You can do this with very inexpensive equipment – such as an RF detector – assuming the source isn’t adjusting his attacks in real time. Signal strength will increase with proximity to the source.

 

What have you gained by obtaining evidence that a specific person is attempting to harm you?

You’ve gained focus for a more thorough (and expensive) investigation by expert witnesses whose testimony will support your claim in court.

 

If you can prove harm, you’ll eventually have a criminal case. (Assault is illegal, whether it was performed with a microwave weapon or a baseball bat; there doesn’t have a law specifically prohibiting the use of a particular implement against you.)

 

Can you prove that mind control technology is being used against you, and how does that help you?

Implant detection

 

U.S. researchers recently demonstrated silk-based implants, with miniscule electrodes imprinted on a silk substrate that melts away, allowing for precise placement of the electrodes.7 This isn't necessarily happening to TI's, but it pays to think outside the box when considering implant architectures.

Many targets repeatedly get ‘hit’ in the same areas; some have discernible bulges under their skin suggesting the presence of foreign objects. It’s possible they have implants in those areas; it’s even possible that mind control technology requires the presence of implants.

 

Possible methods of detection include:

 

•Metal detectors or stud finders;

•An MRI reading;

•A CT scan, CAT scan, or X-ray reading.

However, just because the suspected implant or implants aren’t detected by commercial equipment, doesn’t mean they don’t exist. I’ve previously suggested that targets might be carrying covert taggants which enable tracking and targeting8, or the implants themselves might be microscopic.

 

Detection of covert taggants or implants will have to be through more indirect means. I’ll get to that in a minute.

 

So you’ve found an implant. What have you proved?

Unfortunately, not much. You have a foreign object in your body; it is in your possession; you have the right to disable it or remove it.

 

You don’t know who put it there, or how it’s affecting your body or nervous system. (However, a link between certain kinds of implants and cancer has been previously demonstrated.6.)

 

How likely are you to capture signals?

If hypothesized mind control signals are directed at implants in your body, they might (as discussed above in the Measurements section) be undetectable on commercial spectrum analyzers. Furthermore, the target’s harassers are unlikely to cooperate.

 

In my opinion, the best shot involves going after targets who are getting some form of highly frequent harassment (typically 24/7 voice-to-skull or subliminals).

 

It’s possible that targets getting highly frequent harassment are getting it from programmable implants – a telling sign would be that the harassment doesn’t go away when the target is inside a shielded environment, but it gets “dumber”. Programmable implants might be getting signals from the outside world only occasionally.

 

Will capturing signals help you?

For the sake of argument, let’s say the signals can be captured, and you manage to capture them. What’ve you got?

 

You’ve got a recording of an unusual signal that means nothing to the layman, or even to most civilian scientists and engineers. You have to demonstrate that this signal has an effect on you – and ideally, on others.

 

Reproducibility

Having captured a mind control signal, if you can replay it and reproduce its effects on your nervous system or mind under controlled conditions, you now know that mind control technology is being used against you, and what its nature is. 

You’re ready for a more focused – and expensive – investigation.

 

On the utility of witnesses

In the event that you find evidence linking attacks on you to a specific location, you’re almost ready to take legal action. However, you shouldn’t expect your adversary to lie down and accept a beating from the legal system; he might challenge you in court, and even counter-sue. You need credible expert witnesses who can verify or testify that attacks against you are coming from the location in question, and that they are harming you or causing you distress.

 

In the event you manage to capture signals to implants in your body (or mind control signals), expert witnesses will be an essential element of your proof that clandestine technology has been used against you. You would need to reproduce the signals’ effect on you in a shielded environment, in a double-blind study9, with reliable expert witnesses who understand the experiment and what’s being claimed.

Conclusions

The obstacles to proving the use of electronic harassment against a target are enormous, and even understated in this article. Much of what I’ve written above will not apply if the target’s harassers do not cooperate – or worse, act to mislead the target.

From our perspective, exposing targeting operations en masse is more economical and more likely than being able to prove they’re happening to a particular person. Skeptical third parties might be able to work wonders by bringing detection equipment with them on surprise visits to targeted individuals, but for them, talk is much cheaper.

It’s been three years of overt electronic harassment for me, and much longer for others, but we’re still at an impasse.

 

Please go to LAST PAGE OF "Replies to this Discussion" to read NEWEST Information

Views: 1945

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Why not look to a local research facility for evidence?
Its all here right under our noses.

http://igert.beckman.illinois.edu/courses.html

Neuro-Democracy
I'm thinking that there are about six blood tests that could reveal this microwave sickness, the Glaser report is pre censored unclassified evidence.
Much of the Russian evidence could be used as well.
The problem is with the person actually doing the testing, how do we know they are not corrupt?
http://mother-earth-journal.com/2010/07/bio-effects-of-radio-frequency-and-microwave-radiation/

Please note that all TI sites will be infiltraited, this can be expected. Please be prepaired for the stuff.

Further evidence could be found in the form of small zit like spots that are indicitive of lasering, this will be in the area of missing teeth. On the inside of the cheek there will be a small growth.
Think of your entire body as the body of evidence.
Peace.
Thanks for all that info and book recommendation! I am going to pick it up when I have the money.

Here are two books that I read so far during my research. I am about half way done with the second one.

Brainwash The Secret History of Mind Control

http://www.amazon.com/Brainwash-Secret-History-Mind-Control/dp/0312...

Mind Wars Brain Wars and National Defense

http://www.amazon.com/Mind-Wars-Research-National-Defense/dp/193259...







Robert Duncan said:
People forget how advanced the psychological triggers are, how the CIA programs say, "Discredit the target, use them for our objective, then dispose of them by local authorities." It disheartens me to see how easily new TIs fall for all their deceiption and ploys. Please read my book so we don't have the errors of our past repeat themselves.

"The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was to make the world believe he didn't exist."

Project: Soul Catcher vol. 2 Secrets of Cyber and Cybernetic Warfare Revealed

About the Authors:
The Mind Hacking Strategy Group is a consortium of conscientious scientists who report the abuses of science. ROBERT DUNCAN holds multiple degrees from Harvard University and Dartmouth College in Applied Sciences and Business. He has worked on projects for the Department of Defense, CIA and Justice Department in his career.

About the Book:
Volume 2 details the CIA’s practices of interrogation and cybernetic mind control in their pursuit to weaponize neuropsychology. It covers the art of bio-communication war. Human beings are complex machines but their inner workings have been deciphered. Mind control and brainwashing have been perfected in the last 60 years. Hacking computers and hacking into individual minds are similar. The 21st century will be known as the age of spiritual machines and soulless men.

The Objective:
During these mind control projects the handlers require a certain amount of ignorance by the individual about the topic to do their dirty work. More a person understands, the less influence they have. They have given up on subjects once they know too much. Humanity is undergoing a cataclysmic evolutionary event. Technology can be used for good or evil. These volumes of Project: Soul Catcher hope to force a technology transfer to the public sector for all its benefits by exposing the U.S.'s darkest secrets.
"Ye shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free."

http://www.createspace.com/3446406
Discount code 8AUSMH36
I had a themed movie in mind concerning Neuroethics:
"In 1995, UNESCO's International Bioethics Committee (IBC; founded in 1993) developed a similar study to explore ethics and the neurosciences [17]. The report highlighted the challenges of behavioral research involving deception and manipulation, and of research involving patients, children and captive populations who might have limited capacity to make informed and voluntary decisions about participation. The IBC report also noted the particular difficulty of disseminating neuroscience findings to the public, citing possible misunderstanding of behavioral genetics results as an example."

Or should I say NeuroEthic$ since behavioral research brings in so much money?

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1656950/


Kevin Canada said:
I JUST FILM THEIR AND PUT IT ON YOU TUBE. SOMEBODY SHOULD HELP ME MAKE A TI MOVIE.

KEVIN





Nicholas Torres said:
Thanks for the link! It's seems that research facilities are still being funded by national security agencies. I am betting that Psychologists
and Psychiatrists are giving advice on how to attack someone's nervous
system with these Directed Energy Weapons. All street theater events
and electronic harassment are designed to put stress on the nervous
system and make the TI more "suggestible" to old interrogation and mind
control tacts.



Jay Sinn said:
Why not look to a local research facility for evidence?
Its all here right under our noses.

http://igert.beckman.illinois.edu/courses.html

Neuro-Democracy
Permalink Reply by Warren 14 minutes ago
Please ensure that those being sued are accurately convicted. Resist any mind controlled urges to prosecute manchurian candidates or people who have had their bodies stolen. Convictions should be with proper mental proof that the perp is not a mind control victim, it's of little use to prosecute a body if the proper owner is not properly responsible.

Warren
SyntheticTelepathy.com
Conduct a stakeholder analysis of who had the most benefince from the decisions in relation to the TI. With a perogative of following the money. Do a survay of just how much this research contributes to the local economy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stakeholder_Analysis#Methods_of_Stakeh...

Start with the actual mechanism of HSR on the State and Local levels this will be the Health Departments.
This is who enables the research by having research laws that are prone to blanket interpretation.

The most likely institution conducting the research will be local universities and medical facilities.
Also compair the blanket interpritation of HSR laws with the 13th amendment. I don't hear too much of anyone trying that route but it just might be applicable.
And remember Problem, Synthesis, Solution :)
Robin Yan said:
Permalink Reply by Warren 14 minutes ago
Please ensure that those being sued are accurately convicted. Resist any mind controlled urges to prosecute manchurian candidates or people
who have had their bodies stolen. Convictions should be with proper
mental proof that the perp is not a mind control victim, it's of little
use to prosecute a body if the proper owner is not properly responsible.

Warren
SyntheticTelepathy.com
Dear my friend:

My concern is our evidence can stand the test of any kind. This is why in the future we need famous human right lawyers.
By the way, please see the evidence I collected from Toronto Police Service. It is 41 division report on the "Photo" of our webpage. Meanwhile, pls. see part of my response to this report.

I just take 5 examples (too many conflicts and lies in this report.I couldn’t explain everything.) to testify that 41 divison of Toronto Police Service fabricated and falsed their report after I reported to them about gang-stalking and the use of non-lethal weapons, with my family doctory’s advice and judgement.( I consulted my family doctor several times regarding my symptom and my neighbour after evidence and signs accumulated to some extent.)
1) In 41 division's report wasn’t any words and expressions to describe “gang-stalking” (pls see my first report to 41 division of Toronto Police Service).Howeve, they stated: “ the subject believed was a neighbour dispute.”( 8 line from the bottom, first page of 41 divison report.)
2) In 41divison’s report they confirmed that, “He also supplied an information sheet on “Sound as weapons” (Non-lethal weapons) (21 line of second page,41 division’s report). However, in 41 division's report, they stated: “He speculated that the rays might have been nuclear in nature. ( 15th line of the second page, 41 division's report). Everyone knows that nuclear weapons and non-lethal weapons are totally different. In addition, at that time, I was taking secondary diploma course( I got Bachelor's degree of Engineering in a key university). Please see my grade of that semester. Among 11 subjects, 7 subjects were A or A+, 4 were B or B+. I can not see the difference?
3) After seening my family doctor’s advice and judgement, 41 division of TPS couldn’t wait to induce my family doctor’s mind in his office as follows:
“We really appreciate what he provided to us. And we think everything he reported is true. We work a lot than you think, even we are still working on it till now. Your neighbor is not the person who can commit this kind of crime. We didn’t find anything about it.”
However, from the statement of 41 division’s report, “The subject related what seemed to be a totally implausible situation.”(7 line from the bottom, first page of 41 division report)
41 division stated: “You neighbor is not the person who can commit this kind of crime.” Please see these two scenarios:
a) One medical expert advised me to try to meet my neighbor, the fist gang stalker to see if there was something unusual. Around 6:45 ,one early winter morning, we met in the lobby of our apartment. I found he was wearing a full face of fake beard. I couldn’t see any part of his face, except his nose, eyes and lips. One cap covered his whole forehead.
b) At about 2:00am ,December 5, 2005, I was awaken up by sharp head pain in my living room(after I reported to 41 division of TPS ). I did not move. I heard my upper neighbor was walking around above my body in his living room. Then he stopped above my body in his living room. Suddenly, he dropped one stuff onto his floor hardly and sounded buzzing, just above my body. I knew he would do something. I did not move. After a while, two people walked into his living room, standing above my body for a while. Then one person stood by the living room’s window, two other people went out and brought back a heavy stuff. Then they left.
4) As to my first report to 41 division of Toronto Police Service, why did 41 division hide this report and refuse to provide it to some organization, which I asked to review my entire report to 41 division of Toronto Police Service?
5) Regarding “medication”, 41 division spent too much energy to talk about this word in its report. However, they didn’t tell and clarify the name of the medication. It was pain killer.

If you, I , or anybody believes it is hard evidence. Good. Analyze it according to the literature and the law, then
keep it. What can we do? Let's work together as a whole to create a chance which can alter our fate.

Take care

Robin Yan


Kevin Canada said:
I HAVE TONS OF EVIDENCE IF ANYBODY EVER TAKES THE TIME TO WATCH MY VIDEOS

http://www.youtube.com/user/kcraigdc

KEVIN CANADA
here is a link to my blog
http://anuworldorder.blogspot.com/

and here is a photo of what it looks like when a heart attack is sent out via radio waves
the handlers call it a code blue
Attachments:
here is what it looks like when they send cardiac arrhythmia to a targeted individual
here is a blog link with other photos and scalar info

http://anuworldorder.blogspot.com/
Attachments:
Madeline, I see the same situation for a lot of us. We were target when disabled. I´m also, due to neck/spine damage.
It seems they target a lot of this category. My guess is they (University hospitals, Government, Science institutes etc..)
share the information some how, even if illegal here in Sweden, sharing personal data. And yes, we are easy victims, and of course attractive to do science on... But we have a track here to follow. This is of importance to notify when filing letters to gov. or other instances. This is no coincidence, and I myself are trying to ivestigate however I am on any "research list" at the big University hospital, from where I have received treatment. Or it could also be the insurance company for disables (don´t know what you call it in your country.?)that shares informations about their customers.
You could be right. Someone said a radio which is tuned to AM530 will be able to tell if there is any microwave
radiation taking place. It will cause a lot of noise to the radio broadcast I guess.
the microwave weapons they use to project sound into your home is easily heard on anything that has an energy wave such as the refrigerator, especially if it seems to be talkig in the background of the motor when it runs, in air conditioning or heater vents, louder when air is flowing through them, in the bath water, shower, running sink water...anything of this nature.

it is easy to be able to identify tat it is microwave technology once you know what to look for and what to listen for.

one if the easiest ways to identify it is by the sound of street traffic or airplanes flying over. where you would normally hear them during the day and night sometimes they are so much louder than others. that is when the microwaves are flowing in your direction as they amplify noise mire that the scalar,v2k and squad technology.

YOU OBVIOUSLY ARE HEARING THESE NOISES SO DO NOT LISTEN TO ANYONE WHO WOULD TELL YOU IT IS NOT REAL

if you want to send me a short recorded clip from your cell phone or a digital recorder or your computer
here is my address and i will listen to it for you. often you can hear the names of those involved as they must sign on to use these weapons like an internet cafe connection.

cynthia.a.dupuy@gmail.com

another sure way to identify microwave technology is by what is called 'halos'
if it is foggy outside and you can look out at night and there seems to be a reflection of the street light right next to the real street light.
it is a holographic type halo and i have seen 2 and 3 lined up in a row besides a street light before.
another thing is if you are looking out of a window at night as it is easier to see at night and you see a reflection of the tv screen or computer monitor, lamp or whatever...
the halo affect will cause 2 reflections to appear in close proximity of each other.

you are not crazy....prince charles was too afraid to fly and gave an entire speech to abudabi using this same technology

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Latest Activity

Larry Lee Whitsitt posted a blog post

After March 1999 Were The Most Large Beams in Head

  About a month after March 1999 I was receiving about 4 to 5  beams into my head 6" in diameter.  One beam was direct frontal to forehead, and the rest were in from the sides at an angle.  These were people from over 20 countries wondering what happened, an interrogation all,  and  went on for over 2 years ... of a message from the spirit.  While seeking to photo electro-neuro beams lately, and realizing multiples at the same time, reminded me of the period after March 1999 with all the beams…See More
4 hours ago
deca commented on deca's video
Thumbnail

Theories of selective attention | Processing the Environment | MCAT | Khan Academy

"obviously as a victim its important what you give your attention too and what meaning and relevance it has ...."
yesterday
deca posted a video

Theories of selective attention | Processing the Environment | MCAT | Khan Academy

Learn about the three major theories of selective attention. By Carole Yue. . Created byCarole Yue. Watch the next lesson: https://www.khanacademy.org/test-p...
yesterday
Sandy Lomax commented on hassanmcv's blog post 5G : A network of the control of the machines by Morphéus n° 82, juillet-août 2017
"Thanks for the global research link, Hassan, by Harlan Girard - remember him on Jesse Ventura`s Brain Invaders? He went public as a TI early on. Sadly he has recently passed away. I will post the video."
yesterday
Robin Yan replied to Robin Yan's discussion Mr Attorney General of Canada, Mr Ontario Ombudsman and International Human Rights Community confirmed.
"Please check who is hacking this post and tell the truth."
yesterday
Robin Yan posted a discussion

Mr Attorney General of Canada, Mr Ontario Ombudsman and International Human Rights Community confirmed.

UNUN Human RightsUN Human Rights CouncilInternational Bar AssociationHuman Rights WatchAmnesty International Amnesty International CanadaInternational human rights community International criminal courtCanadian governments With  this photo below, I , Canadian victim of torture, terror, threats, attempted murder,,, show you all that Toronto Police, Canadian torturers backed by Ontario Government hack my tablet or mobile phone although I don't use wifi and internet after UN, International Human…See More
yesterday
Larry Lee Whitsitt posted photos
yesterday
CLS replied to CLS's discussion MIND CONTROL TORTURE
"Hello, I updated my site again. I added information on voting fraud. IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU UNDERSTAND THIS BECAUSE WHEN YOU GO TO VOTE THEY CAN TAKE AWAY YOUR RIGHTS! Read from "Voting Fraud" https://mindcontroltorture.wordpress.com/"
yesterday

Badge

Loading…

© 2017   Created by Soleilmavis.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service