Blogs

All Posts (12222)

Sort by

US Army's Voice to Skull (V2K) Devices

Posted by denny32 on June 11, 2013 at 3:18am

The new UK TETRA system for police communications pulses at about 17 Hertz and is generating fears of what this will do to the brains of the officers using these mobile phones. Pulsing the high frequency microwave transmission allows multiple phone calls to be sent like packets on the Internet. 

The basic high frequency drives the electromagnetic radiation deep into the brain while the pulsing of that transmission at the incredibly low rate matches the brain wave frequency which, I suspect, is what results in the ability to hear. 

This could prove to be quite harmful and lethal in many instances. It's not exactly a "Non Lethal Weapon" and is an instrument of torture interrogation with lethal consequences from its usage. It is not being used for just scaring birds 

http://mindcontrol.twoday.net/stories/530612/

Read more…

我再次被”颅骨里的说话声音“恐吓今晚要杀死我

Posted by Ying (Joanne) Zhao, 赵颖 on June 10, 2013 at 10:22pm

今天，我正在吃晚饭的时候，我从大脑"颅骨里的说话声音"中"听"到：今天是2013年6月10日，我今晚要被杀死......

我感到，美国人要故意选好日子，秘密杀害我。我的生活与"6”有关的还有：

我的加拿大SIN号码：661 666 974【中文发音："6”"6”要，"666”（六六大顺），久妻死】

我的加拿大永久居民卡号码：5429-0619（中文发音：吾死儿久，零"6”要久）

我的加拿大卡尔加里的车牌号码：FWY-566 （Forward Ying：英语缩写：FWY，566：中文发音：吾"6”"6”)

 

2004年，我登陆加拿大之后，去打工，提供我的SIN号码的时候，那个加拿大经理和我开玩笑，说："666 is bad, means evil." 后来，我在ESL学校里，练英语口语的时候，和老师聊天：...If 666 is bad in Canada？ESL老师告诉我：yes.

那时候，我知道，在加拿大，"666” is bad。 在中国，"6”是吉利的。

这些事很巧合。

2006年冬天，我在加拿大卡尔加里的ESL学校里，开始感到有卫星跟踪感、监视感，之后，开始有生病、在公寓的房顶上听到"Noise"、感到被ESL学校的Manager监视、2010年初开始在颅骨里"听"到说话声音、记忆力下降、到医院被诊断为“妄想状态”、检查发现“高泌乳素血症”、吃药一直治不好病、加拿大移民申诉、在北京上法庭告外企没赢等经历。

在2006年冬天之前，我已经被美国的卫星秘密跟踪，而且，美国人秘密地向其他加拿大人使用卫星微波脑控武器

另外，我还经常从大脑"颅骨里的说话声音"中"听"到有关我的加拿大前同居男友刘绿原、我的大学师兄（我在加拿大的Closed friend，是一名在加拿大工作多年的软件工程师）、其他移民朋友们的事。美国人用卫星武器秘密地对准这些人

我是脑控受害者、Targeted Individual (TI) Victim of USA's mind control weapon。我和其他受害者一样，有相似的不幸经历。如今，我的三只宠物猫已经全部被害死了。

 

美国总统、美国公民被美国公民暗杀过......  美国的军事卫星、太空武器覆盖全球.......有军事秘密.......      

 

美国的脑控武器很不人道，定向能武器对准人等，HAARP人工制造地震、干旱等，美国的军事武器是大规模杀伤性的。

 

很多人报告，美国的HAARP武器等已经秘密投入使用，并且杀人。

 

美国的军事违法。

 

God bless us

*************************************************************************************************

Websites about High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP), Mind Control Weapons, Targeted Individual (TI) Victims of Mind Control Weapons, Directed Energy Weapon (DEW), military satellite and space weapons...

https://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/websites-about-usa-s-haarp-mind-control-tis-space-weapons?xg_source=activity

Read more…

The list of German cars license numbers tracking me from rural area in Croatia to Sofia in Bulgaria. The last part with no country name is all Germany. I got my wallet stolen today and went to the pol

Posted by MiyokoGoto on June 10, 2013 at 5:27am

The list of German cars license numbers tracking me from rural area in Croatia to Sofia in Bulgaria. The last part with no country name is all Germany. I got my wallet stolen today and went to the police station to report it. I can stay in Sofia for next few weeks with minimum living needs. The V2K perps saying that they now want to take my luggages and especially the recorder I bought in Turkey as a sorvenior and very hard. Basically, the perps might be trying to make up the story like I suppose to be a homeless with no money or a prostitute getting money from the sex work. Well, I just travel around with my bank savings for few years then.

WAK K 709 Germany
OB TZ 50 Germany
CE 484VE Italy
E WW 1617 Germany
DO M 232 Germany
F KC 632 Germany
K MM 9958 Germany
546 0129 USA
WE RG 84 Germany
RI 568 PH Croatia
U95 7WP USA
LJ EE-581 SLO
MTK BN 500 Germany
KN PK 138 Germany
BM DI 506 Germany
DU 8683 Germany
WN OI 861 Germany
KN SM 456 Germany
LXE 026 Holland
SR F 3003 Germany
WN F 1269 Germany
OD DK 858 Germany
STA 40K Switzerland
M OD 509 Germany
H FA 6363 Germany
XX 6748  
BL MN 202 Germany
ST EP 2811 Germany
HIS WP 739 Germany
976 8779 USA
HS JN 555 Germany
K HM 5468 Germany
22 EP 030 Germany

HN SI 4151
F IM 3008
M MR 4501
F BE 1106
M RR 585
EBE DD 555
OAL EE 100
GP UV 300
M C 9815

HD MR 142
OAL BH 93
PA D 4384
B EE 6999
FU VP 101
R AU 550
HL ON 1940
KA P 237
WT GN 500
Lö HD 266
F MB 1089
M HC 1017
HG JU 501
KLE PW 55
E MC 559
HE JE 562
KN MD 413
BAR JS 501
TS FS 102
OF EE 107
HH PO 7282
BB ZV 147
AB 537 EY
Read more…

United Nations today has broken its long-held silence

Posted by Robin Yan on June 7, 2013 at 9:52pm
UN report: The link between State surveillance and freedom of expression

In a landmark report, the United Nations today has broken its long-held silence about the threat that State surveillance poses to the enjoyment of the right to priva...cy.   The report is clear: State surveillance of communications is ubiquitous, and such surveillance severely undermines citizens’ ability to enjoy a private life, freely express themselves and enjoy their other fundamental human rights. Presented today at the UN Human Rights Council session in Geneva, the report marks the first time the UN has emphasised the centrality of the right to privacy to democratic principles and the free flow of speech and ideas.   Issued by the UN Special Rapporteur on the freedom of opinion and expression, the report breaks a tradition long-held by UN human rights mechanisms to remain relatively silent on State surveillance. The last clear statement by a UN body about the oppressive effects of State surveillance came in 2009 when the UN Special Rapporteur on counter-terrorism, Martin Scheinin, raised concerns about the growing tide of surveillance modalities adopted by States in the aftermath of 9/11, and called on the UN to take action to update its understandings of the right to privacy in the face of the internet and new technologies.   Since that time, legal safeguards have been rolled back, new technologies have been adopted and surveillance techniques have proliferated. Today, the Special Rapporteur reports, “the State now has a greater capability to conduct simultaneous, invasive, targeted and broad-scale surveillance than ever before.” Advancements in Surveillance   The report begins by describing the evolution of surveillance technologies, noting that as the means by, and frequency with which people are able to communicate has expanded and evolved, so too have the means by which States sought to monitor private communications. Modern surveillance technologies and arrangements enable States to intrude into an individual’s private life, threatening to blur the divide between the private and the public spheres. Individuals are no longer able to even know that they have been subjected to such surveillance, let alone challenge it.   Further, technological advancements mean that the State’s effectiveness in conducting surveillance is no longer limited by scale or duration. Declining costs of technology and data storage have eradicated financial or practical disincentives to conducting surveillance.   The Special Rapporteur goes on to outline different types of targeted and mass communications surveillance techniques employed by States, including the use of IMSI catchers, offensive intrusion software, including trojans, and deep-packet inspection technologies. Access to communications data held by third party services provides another common modality of surveillance, remarks the report. “As the private sector collects progressively larger amounts of varied data that reveal sensitive information about peoples’ daily lives, and individuals and businesses choose to store the content of their communications, such as voicemails, e-mails and documents, with third party service providers, access to communications data is an increasingly valuable surveillance technique employed by States.” With the proliferation of mandatory data retention laws across the globe, States now have a treasure trove of data to filter and analyse. Advances in surveillance technology and techniques are particularly concerning given the global trend towards deteriorating legal safeguards, notes the report. The Special Rapporteur observes that generally, legislation has not kept pace with the changes in technology, creating gaps that deprive individuals of protection and allow for the extra-legal use of surveillance. The requirement that surveillance requires judicial authorization is being dispensed with in many States, which are also rolling back requirements that law enforcement agencies return to the court for ongoing supervision of surveillance activities. Vague and unspecified notions of “national security” have become an acceptable justification for the interception of and access to communications in many countries. States are accessing communications data held by third parties in a situation where there is no regulation or oversight of the practice.   The report also notes a number of other legal trends related to surveillance: in some States legislation is being adopted that purports to authorize extra-territorial surveillance or interception of communications in foreign jurisdictions. Mandatory data retention laws requiring Internet and telecom service providers to continuously collect and preserve communications content and information about users’ online activities proliferate. Laws requiring the provision of identification at cybercafés and the use of real names online abound.   Each of these acts threatens both an individual’s freedom to express themselves, and their right to maintain a private life and private communications. In this way, privacy and free expression are two sides of the same coin, each an essential prerequisite to the enjoyment of the other. To freely form and impart ones political, religious or ethnical beliefs one needs an autonomous, private space free from interference, from the State, private sector or other citizens. Equally, infringements on the right to privacy – physical or online surveillance, monitoring of communications or activities, State intrusion into private, family or home affairs – prevent an individual from exercising their freedom expression.   The role of the private sector   Importantly, the report recognizes the vital role of the private sector, in both the advancement of communications technology as well as facilitators of, or at worst complicit in, State surveillance. Innovations and research by the private sector undoubtedly have contributed greatly to how we communicate. What the report cautions, however, is the nature of the relationship between the state and corporations when it comes to surveillance.   Since the 1990s, governments have increasingly sought to require communication technologies and digital networks to allow for easy access to communications data, ie backdoors. The private sector not only interfaces with the State to deal with these requests, but how they store and process data, making them huge repositories of personal information available to the state at virtually any time, according to the report.   But the greatest danger, the report cautions, is the global industry that has developed around the sale of invasive and mass surveillance technologies to governments. The industry, the report highlights, remains virtually unregulated and often operates outside of existing legal standards. Repressive regimes are commonly the buyers of the technology, making it more likely that the products being sold and serviced by private companies will be used to carry out human right abuses. The report calls on governments to “ensure that the private sector is able to carry out its functions independently in a manner that promotes individuals’ human rights”. At the same time, the report states that corporations “cannot be allowed to participate in activities that infringe upon human rights, and States have a responsibility to hold companies accountable in this regard.” Recommendations and the road ahead   The Special Rapporteur concludes the report by making a number of recommendations to States, including the following:   Communications surveillance must be regulated by legal frameworks, must be strictly and demonstrably necessary to achieve a legitimate aim, and must be subject to the principle of proportionality; Illegal surveillance by public or private actors should be criminalized; The provision of communications data by the private sector to the State should be sufficiently regulated and monitored by an independent authority; Anonymity online should not be outlawed, nor should encryption; Measures must be taken to prevent the commercialization of surveillance technology, considering their ability to facilitate human rights abuses.   With each new piece of technology, a dangerous cat-and-mouse game emerges – increased connectivity also leads to a greater chance of a breach of confidentiality. That is why the Special Rapporteur calls upon the UN human rights mechanisms to update their conceptualisations of the right to privacy in the context of new technologies.   Without this, existing protections will not just become outdated. Rather, inaction to reconceptualise how our privacy is protected will leave the door wide open for States to abuse new technology, violating our rights in the process, all because those with the power to do so refused to act.
https://www.privacyinternational.org/blog/un-report-the-link-between-state-surveillance-and-freedom-of-expression
Read more…

如何有效地限制房价，让平民百姓买得起房

Posted by bbhh on June 7, 2013 at 10:45am
如何有效地限制房价，让平民百姓买得起房
　　当前的问题是，权贵有房千百套，多数平民买不起房，正确的做法应该是第一套房不征税，第二套房每年征税房价的5%，第三套房每年征税房价的20%，第四套房每年征税房价的30%，以此类推，这样可有效抑制房价上涨，政府获得税收，对一般的交易不受影响，可搞活房产市场，可谓多赢，问题是现在制定政策的就是权贵，所以这样的政策出不来。
　　第二套房为什么要每年征税房价的5%，因为多数人把第二套房用来出租，所以收一点税是应该的，至于第三第四套千百套房，本来是属于其他平民的，权（吸血鬼）贵用特权手段获得，必须还给平民，而提高交易税是很不妥的，是权（吸血鬼）贵在拖延时间。
 
90695_1367859095ZcOD.gif

90695_1367859096QnGJ.jpg

90695_1367859097tOY4.jpg

37亿是个什么概念呢，按银行存款利率以年息3.5计算，一天就是35万啊！

Read more…

朝鲜籍日军！灭绝人性的二鬼子

Posted by bbhh on June 7, 2013 at 10:41am
朝鲜籍日军！灭绝人性的二鬼子
 
90695_1366184672H8zy.jpg
不戴钢盔的朝鲜籍士兵
 
90695_13662135923cvu.jpg
不戴钢盔的朝鲜籍士兵
 
90695_13662143946gF6.jpg

90695_1366214394b0Vy.jpg
不戴钢盔的朝鲜籍士兵
 
　　大家都知道日本侵略过中国，制造过南京大屠杀，可能你不知道侵略中国的日军中大部分是朝鲜人。
　　甲午战争后，朝鲜王朝对中国清政府彻底失去了依附的信心，他们日益亲俄，后被日本战领和统治了有50多年，日本侵略中国时军人中大部分是朝鲜人，朝鲜人本来就非常野蛮，在南京朝鲜人兽性大发，杀了30多万南京人。
　　 @煮酒谈史:  【侵华战争中被遗忘的罪人】他们比日军更凶残，甘当日军的急先锋。南京大屠杀中，他们是第一支违反日军军令开始强奸中国妇女的联队。他们因"作战勇敢"受到日本天皇的嘉奖，他们不戴钢盔，强奸完妇女后挖出子宫再套在她头上，把人活活憋死！他们是日军的狗腿子，他们是朝鲜籍日军！灭绝人性的二鬼子。
 
 
不容掩盖---侵华日军朝鲜籍士兵在中国灭绝人性的兽行
http://bbs.tiexue.net/post_4454741_1.html
　　南京大屠杀，第一支违反日军军令开始强奸中国妇女的日军部队是松井石根15师团中的朝鲜联队（团级单位）。在所有攻占南京城的日军部队中人的朝鲜比例并不低，最高的甚至高达40%都是朝鲜人。战后很多日本人的回忆录中都提到过朝鲜军人对日本的忠诚。
　　(这样的忠诚在中国人眼中就是残忍)。如果说那时朝鲜被日本并吞，没有办法，那么好吧，相比台湾人也曾被编入日军，但就是因为其不够“勇敢”只能大部分作为伙夫和挑夫出现，吴子牛的电影《南京大屠杀》中有这么个台湾兵角色，因为私自放走被掳掠的中国同胞，被其日本战友杀死。由此，朝鲜人的民族天性可见一斑。
　　一些当时幸存的老南京（当时是收尸队的）回忆，参与南京大屠杀的日军当中有相当大的一部分是日本从朝鲜征调的韩籍士兵，其残忍手段一点也不逊于日本兵。现住工人新村的南京汽车集团退休职工王克俭老人（81岁）回忆说：“很多不戴钢盔的鬼子兵（韩籍士兵，没钢盔戴）强奸女人后活活挖出女人的子宫再套在女人头上，把人活活窒息而死！还起名叫;从哪里来到哪里去。妈了个B的，记住这帮杂种。资料参考：《南京大屠杀》
新入伍的朝鲜籍日军
　　此人出生在忠清南道，叫李虎巴，日本名字是武藏正雄，是参与南京大屠杀的日本15师团朝鲜联队的军曹，这张照片是日本随军记者所拍，登在《朝日新闻》后标题是“南京之战中的朝鲜勇士”。
　　南朝鲜最悍勇的将军，第二师师长白善烨，后担任南朝鲜军总参谋长，四星上将。朝鲜战争中他最早判断出中国军队参战的——那些夜战，地雷，包抄的战术太像八路军了！不过，美国人不相信他的判断……
　　白将军之所以熟悉八路，是因为他曾经在华北作为日军中朝鲜伪军的一员侥幸生还，回来写了一本书，叫做《死里逃生，中国华北》，朝鲜战争打响后，这本书就变成畅销书了。
　　在朝鲜，为弥补兵员的不足，日本在控制朝鲜以后，推行了一系列诸如“皇民化运动”、“创氏改姓”等奴化朝鲜人的政策。就跟日本在台湾推行的类似政策所产生的后果一样，朝鲜人中有不少被培植成日本的忠实臣民，他们自愿充当日本军人，充当日本人的炮灰。根据日本防卫厅1973年统计，在约250万侵华日军C.P有朝鲜籍士兵160万，在伪“满州国”军中38万。这其中最著名的就是参加了伪满第六方面军“讨伐队”。战后远东法庭审判时，松井石根说南京大屠杀开始的第一个部队就是带头强 J中国妇女的朝鲜人，并得到证实。战后受到盟军战犯审判的朝鲜战犯有148人有罪，其中23人执行死刑。甚至在后来的越战中，道德最败坏的也是朝鲜兵。
二战中的朝鲜族战犯
　　朝鲜人和韩国人声嘶力竭高呼它们是二战受害国，被征用的朝鲜人只是充当了日军后勤人员、劳工而没有加入作战部队，如果真是这样，那么战后因为“针对虐杀．虐待俘虏及一般市民的“通常的战争犯罪”而作为“原日本兵”受到审判、被定为乙级战犯的148名朝鲜半岛人（其中23人被处以死刑）从何而来？
　　至于朝鲜籍乙级战犯们在“皇军”中的地位和为“皇军”做出的贡献，请参考这几个同样是乙级战犯的倭狗：制造南京大屠杀的元凶谷寿夫、侵华日军第23军司令官酒井隆、侵华日军华南派遣军司令官田中久一。
附：日本军队中朝鲜军官
▲将军级 =
金应善 鱼 潭 王瑜植 李熙斗 洪思翊
▲领官级 =
姜锡佑 康弼佑 高良弼 高永均 权承禄 金基元 金锡源 金亨燮 南宇铉 朴斗荣 朴范集 朴胜薰 朴在兴 白洪锡 申应均 申泰英 安秉范 元容德 柳冀圣 刘升烈 柳元孝 尹相弼 李大永 李秉规 李龙文 李应九 李应俊 李锺赞 李学来 李炯锡 李浩鎭 林业林 在德张 然昌全 永宪 郑观秀 郑斗源 郑 炫 蔡秉德
▲尉官级 =
姜琪泰 姜东烈 姜在浩 桂炳辂 高起范 高俊峰 高俊烈 具东旭 权宁汉 权泰翰 金东元 金东河 金明德 金白一 金思锡 金锡岚 金锡范 金声云 金成勋 金纯善 金信道 金跃先 金 瑛 金永珏 金永禄 金泳秀 金永新 金玉琪 金龙纪 金龙虎 金润根 金应祚 金仁旭 金一焕 金贞烈 金正晧 金贞熙 金锺硕 金锺植 金周赞 金埈元 金重圭 金振吉 金振武 金昌圭 金昌宇 金铁男 金忠男 金忠助 金镐梁 金洪俊 都一平 明勇银 文履祯 文容彩 闵德镐 朴东均 朴东俊 朴奉祚 朴元锡 朴林恒 朴正熙 朴昌夏 朴泰熙 方圆哲 方泰旭 白庆春 白善烨 白仁俊 徐英哲 徐日宝 徐廷弼 石主岩 石希峰 孙炳日 宋锡夏 申尚澈 申鹤鎭 申铉俊 安光铢 安永吉 安永耻 安益祚 安洪涛 杨国鎭 杨大鎭 杨振东 严柱明 廉昌燮 呉俊杰 呉璡泳 禹锺铉 元容国 柳宽熙 刘光烈 兪原植 刘载兴 柳喜章 尹悳炳 尹士新 尹春根 李 珏 李绛宇 李圭一 李根默 李奇建 李德振 李东岩 李东俊 李东勋 李丙胄 李逢春 李尚振 李成林 李升宁 李英杰 李永山 李英春 李 龙 李龙星 李元衡 李宜丰 李济祯 李锺馨 李周一 李春城 李翰林 李亨根 李兴权 李喜谦 林秉圭 张光烈 张箕春 张玑衡 张锡伦 张星熄 张星焕 张永锡 张裕根 全南奎 田源上 丁来赫 郑祥秀 郑云鸿 郑殷熔 丁一权 郑一平 郑 勋 赵大镐 赵秉权 赵性根 池麟泰 池章华 池振国 池治龙 车万载 车 荣 车淸一 崔庆万 崔鸣夏 崔福洙 崔鹏俊 崔世昌 崔承业 崔贞根 崔周锺 崔昌植 崔昌彦 崔学珍 韩镛显 洪涛 洪文杰
　　南京大屠杀就是松井石根率领的一群高丽棒子干的。朝鲜师团是日本关东军的急先锋，侵华主力部队，南京大屠杀一开始就是由朝鲜师团的人挑起的，在日军攻占南京那一天，汉城举国狂欢...
　　在南京大屠杀的时候有5支日军因为"作战勇敢"受到日本天皇的奖励，其中一个就是完全由3万朝鲜人组成的"鲜人部队"。
　　战后因为“针对虐杀．虐待俘虏及一般市民的“通常的战争犯罪”而作为“原日本兵”受到审判、被定为乙级战犯有148名朝鲜人，其中23人被处死刑
　　至于这些朝鲜籍乙级战犯们在日军中的地位和所犯罪行，请参考这几个同样是乙级战犯的日本人：制造南京大屠杀的元凶谷寿夫、侵华日军第23军司令官酒井隆、侵华日军华南派遣军司令官田中久一
　　朝鲜亡国五十年，既少有游击队的反抗，也没有大规模的暴动，95%的朝鲜人改了日本姓，说日本话，二十年代起更是大量踊跃加入日本军队，在中国罪行累累，韩国总统朴正熙总统既为日本士官学校的高材生
　　举一例，1937年南京城因中华门城墙守城士兵打磕睡被日军攻破，第一个登城即是高丽联队( 此记载于日本1972年出版的 <三光作战> 为日本侵华老兵从中国归还者协会老兵集体写作)
　　在这里我只写我所知道的一些历史事实，{1}二战中日本侵华军队(陆军)有128万人，东北70万华北华南58万人，在东南亚有日军(陆军)56万人，总数184万，朝鲜人在日军中服役的有42万，在中国的有35万，大家可以自己算一下这个比例！根据战后查获日军挡案，太平洋战争爆发后日军兵力紧张，有大量的朝鲜人自愿参加日军(不是强抓，否则以1:10计算，需要4万日军看守，这是日军难以承受的)！{2}日本从1931--1945年向中国东北殖民130万，这是大家都知道的，大家不知道的是，从1931起陆续的有90万朝鲜人也紧跟着日本人的屁股殖民中国各地(因为政治原因，准确从未对外发表过)日本1937年至1945年实行积极鼓励朝鲜人移民东北的政策，最根本原因就是因为朝鲜人已经完全成为了日本人的忠实走狗，利用朝鲜移民加强粮食生产，满足侵略战争的需要，并且镇压中国百姓的反抗。
　　在南京大屠杀的时候有5支日军因为"作战勇敢"受到日本天皇的奖励，其中一个就是完全由3万朝鲜人组成的"鲜人部队"，日本宣布投降后，有不下10万计的朝鲜人以各种形式自杀，按常理国家自由，民族解放，人们应该欢欣鼓舞才对，但是在一个美军记者看来，1945年的朝鲜半岛到处是哭泣，哀号，自杀，有如世界末日一般，他在日记中写到：我来到了是一个什么样的国度，在这里我看不见一丝被解放的高兴气息，却犹如置身在日本一般，处处是哀号，哭泣，自杀。
　　韩国的图书馆里有很多在日本军队里当过兵韩国人写的回忆录，以及一些学者对韩国人在3.40年代殖民中国东北所写的书，而且在街面上的书店里这样的书并不少见。
 
Read more…