Blogs

   For all of you looking to search for non-profits  here is a non-profit search engine who makes their non-profit living  by being a data base for nonprofits.  So they go scouring the internet for non-profit organizations in which to add their names to their data base

  Don't know if they have found all of them but it would appear they found some of FFCHS data

but I couldn't find either one of greg gamaches so called nonprofit/not for profit foundations.

i couldn't find The Greg Gamache Foundation nor could I find the

We Are A Federally Liscensed Tax Exempt Not For Profit Dedicated to Eradicating EH Globally of his so called non profit of

Federation Resistance Global Electronic Harassment Opposition Party

but i did find FFCHS

http://www.guidestar.org/organizations/14-1999503/freedom-from-covert-harassment-surveillance.aspx

Your search for Federation Resistance Global produced 0 results.

Your search for the greg gamache foundation produced 0 results.

Viewing 0 - 0 of 0 results

Did you mean: greg gam ache foundation

http://www.guidestar.org/SearchResults.aspx

 JUDGE SAID "Gamache has a history of abusing the system n filing repetitive frivolous lawsuits. Gamache knew or should of known, from his previous filings, he probably would not be permitted to file in forma pauperis. SO THE MONTANA SUIT WAS DISMISSED AS WELL AS HE WAS DENIED FILING IN FORMA PAUPERIS.

http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/montana/mtdce/9:2011cv00043/39273/4/ 

good people take note Greg had to pay for the Montana filing of $350. THE JUDGE DENIED GREG FROM FILING in forma pauperis (in form-ah paw-purr-iss) adj. or adj. Latin for "in the form of a pauper," referring to a party to a lawsuit who gets filing fees waived by filing a declaration of lack of funds (has no money to pay). These declarations are most often found in divorces by young marrieds, or poor defendants who have been sued. http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/In+forma+pauperis

take note good people this guy was getting lawsuits dismissed right and left at the very same time he was trying to lure the community to send him money for his scam of Stein & Stein  back in 2011.  some of us started trying to get in touch with Stein & Stein in May 2011.  HE DOESN'T PROVIDE THE COURT WITH ANY SINGLE EVIDENCE OTHER THAN A SPIEL OH ME OH MY I AM GETTING EH'D

This guy doesn't even learn from his mistakes

and so he turns around and trys the same exact scam using Bohrer Law Firm

what lawyer is going to represent someone like this after that lawyer's staff does a google search

of this guy???  would you represent someone who had no evidence other than typing the words

oh I am being EH'd and finding this type of frivilous law suit .

I mean attorneys can get the complete list cause they pay for access. 

take note good people how many times the judge says this man has filed in fed courts

jeez THE JUDGE SAYS IN THIS ONE THE DEFENDANT SHOULD OF KNOWN BETTER THAT HE COULDN'T FILE IN MONTANA OF A  NAIL IN THE COFFIN OF WHY THIS ONE IS OUTRIGHT FRIVOLOUS ALONG WITH A PILE OF OTHER FILINGS    http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/montana/mtdce/...

STUFF LIKE THIS DOES NOT HELP OUR CASE GOOD PEOPLE  NOT WHEN A PERSON IS FILING WITHOUT

ONE SINGLE PIECE OF EVIDENCE TO BACK THEM UP OTHER THAN FILING A PIECE OF PAPER IN COURT AND

TYPING WORDS OH I AM BEING EH'D

THIS IS A LESSON IN "HOW NOT TO FILE IN FEDERAL COURT"

BUT THAT'S JUST MY OPINION

TAKE CARE GOOD PEOPLE

GREG GAMACHE SUIT DISMISSED BY FEDERAL COURT 2011 http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/maryland/mddce/8:2011cv00601/187912/2/