http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2872732/
All Posts (12527)
Sort by
Dr. John R. Hall, D.O.
5282 Medical Drive # 200, San Antonio, Texas 78229, USA
tel: 210-614-6432
email: halldr@hotmail.com
www.satweapons.com, www.drjohnrhall.com
NON-CONSENSUAL EXPERIMENTATION WITH ELECTROMAGNETIC WEAPONS
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
I am writing you on the behalf of victims both in the United States and abroad. As you are aware, many revelations surrounding the National Security Agency’s extensive electronic dragnet have recently come to light through released records by the intelligence insider Mr. Edward Snowden. During the course of the LIBE Committee hearings even more first-hand testimony was heard from other former NSA insiders regarding the extent of NSA privacy invasion and lack of oversight regarding their methods of data collection. Their statements begin to come very close to an issue that those of us in the medical community in the United States and abroad have been keenly watching for several years now.
Over the last decade we have seen a sharp rise in the number of people coming forward with complaints of non-consensual experimentation with electromagnetic weapons designed to target both electronic hardware and the human central nervous system. While this was typically disregarded as mental illness in the past, the total global population voicing these identical complaints has exponentially grown to numbers that can no longer be attributed to delusional disorder, schizophrenia or any other described mental illness. You may be unaware that the safeguards against experimenting on the public without their consent in the United States are very lax and are included in legislation referred to as The Common Rule which is the Federal Policy regarding human subjects protection. It is written with several loopholes for the allowance of non-consensual experimentation, mostly by intelligence agencies. Hence, we have seen the necessity for the Bioethics Commission hearings in the United States after it was brought to light that Guatemalan prisoners were experimented on with contagions by the National Institutes of Health. During the course of the Bioethics Hearings, their directive was to determine if any other non-consensual experimentation was ongoing in the United States or abroad. At each of the four meetings there was included a public forum for the committee to address concerns by the public at large. Over one hundred individuals were in attendance at each of the four meetings voicing complaints of exposure and experimentation with electromagnetic weapons technologies. The effects of these technologies on the human body can only be described as torture.
Several years ago another National Security Agency insider, John St. Clair Akwei, described in detail the frequencies used by the NSA and other intelligence agencies to access and influence the human body and nervous system in his civil action against the NSA. His descriptions of technologies used to track, monitor and alter a subject’s perceptions, moods and motor control are similar to the complaints we are hearing today from victims alleging non-consensual experimentation and torture. Moreover, Vladimir Putin, in a speech in 2012, admitted that Russia is following suit in funding development of weapons that will attack the human central nervous system. His defense minister, Anatoly Serdyukov, described the weapons as directed energy weapons, wave energy weapons, genetic weapons and psychotronic weapons based upon new physics principles. Obviously, Russia intends to go down the same path of directed energy weapons research that the United States has long been on. The unfortunate truth regarding this type of technology is the ease with which it can be used remotely and non-consensually on the public without the recommended safeguards of an Institutional Review Board or any appreciable ethical oversight. In the United States this research is typically done clandestinely under the guise of national security concerns just as the NSA electronic data mining was done which is currently being covered in the LIBE Committee.
Over the last decade I have consulted with thousands of people in the United States complaining of exposure and experimentation with electromagnetic weapons technologies which include, but are not limited to, complaints of mood alteration, heart palpitations, involuntary body movements, severe headaches, blurred vision, burns to the skin, non-consensual micro-chipping and neurocognitive perturbation. It is my belief, based upon former and current publically released government research documents as well as victims complaints of torture, that this technology is being used in a non-consensual manner on the global public.
I would like to express my deepest gratitude to you for meeting with our representative from the International Center Against Abuse of Covert Technologies and taking the time out of your busy schedule to hear these complaints and read my letter. On behalf of the whole of humanity, I sincerely hope that these technologies will eventually be addressed in the Subcommittee on Human Rights of the European Parliament, as the use of these currently can only be described as torture and dehumanizing.
Thank You,
Dr. John R. Hall, D.O.
5282 Medical Drive # 200, San Antonio, Texas 78229, USA
tel: 210-614-6432
email: halldr@hotmail.com
www.satweapons.com
www.drjohnrhall.com
How to spot a psychopath: A test by criminal psychologists can hit uncomfortably close to home
Tom Chivers, The Daily Telegraph, National Post Wire Services | April 7, 2014 | Last Updated: Apr 8 9:49 AM ET
More from National Post Wire Services
Fotolia
There are a few things we take for granted in social interactions with people. We presume that we see the world in roughly the same way, that we all know certain basic facts, that words mean the same things to you as they do to me. And we assume that we have pretty similar ideas of right and wrong.
But for a small — but not that small — subset of the population, things are very different. These people lack remorse and empathy and feel emotion only shallowly. In extreme cases, they might not care whether you live or die. These people are called psychopaths. Some of them are violent criminals, murderers. But by no means all.
Professor Robert Hare is a criminal psychologist, and the creator of the PCL-R, a psychological assessment used to determine whether someone is a psychopath. For decades, he has studied people with psychopathy, and worked with them, in prisons and elsewhere. “It stuns me, as much as it did when I started 40 years ago, that it is possible to have people who are so emotionally disconnected that they can function as if other people are objects to be manipulated and destroyed without any concern,” he says.
Psychopathy is probably the most pleasant-feeling of all the mental disorders
Our understanding of the brain is still in its infancy, and it’s not so many decades since psychological disorders were seen as character failings. Slowly we are learning to think of mental illnesses as illnesses, like kidney disease or liver failure, and personality disorders, such as autism, in a similar way. Psychopathy challenges this view. “A high-scoring psychopath views the world in a very different way,” says Hare. “It’s like colour-blind people trying to understand the colour red, but in this case ’red’ is other people’s emotions.”
At heart, Hare’s test is simple: a list of 20 criteria, each given a score of 0 (if it doesn’t apply to the person), 1 (if it partially applies) or 2 (if it fully applies). The list includes: glibness and superficial charm, grandiose sense of self-worth, cunning/manipulative, pathological lying, emotional shallowness, callousness and lack of empathy, a tendency to boredom, impulsivity, criminal versatility, behavioural problems in early life, juvenile delinquency, and promiscuous sexual behaviour. A pure, prototypical psychopath – the Fred Wests and Jeffrey Dahmers of this world – would score 40. A score of 30 or more qualifies for a diagnosis of psychopathy. Hare says: “A friend of mine, a psychiatrist, once said: ’Bob, when I meet someone who scores 35 or 36, I know these people really are different.’ The ones we consider to be alien are the ones at the upper end.”
But is psychopathy a disorder — or a different way of being? Anyone reading the list above will spot a few criteria familiar from people they know. On average, someone with no criminal convictions scores 5. “It’s dimensional,” says Hare. “There are people who are part-way up the scale, high enough to warrant an assessment for psychopathy, but not high enough up to cause problems. Often they’re our friends, they’re fun to be around. They might take advantage of us now and then, but usually it’s subtle and they’re able to talk their way around it.” Like autism, a condition which we think of as a spectrum, “psycho-pathy”, the diagnosis, bleeds into normalcy.
We think of psychopaths as killers, criminals, outside society. People such as Joanna Dennehy, a 31-year-old British woman who killed three men in 2013 and who the year before had been diagnosed with a psychopathic personality disorder, or Ted Bundy, the American serial killer who is believed to have murdered at least 30 people and who said of himself: “I’m the most cold-blooded son of a bitch you’ll ever meet. I just liked to kill.” But many psychopathic traits aren’t necessarily disadvantages — and might, in certain circumstances, be an advantage. For their co-authored book, Snakes in suits: How Psychopaths go to work, Hare and another researcher, Paul Babiak, looked at 203 corporate professionals and found about four per cent scored sufficiently highly on the PCL-R to be evaluated for psychopathy. Hare says that this wasn’t a proper random sample (claims that “10% of financial executives” are psychopaths are certainly false) but it’s easy to see how a lack of moral scruples and indifference to other people’s suffering could be beneficial if you want to get ahead in business.
“There are two kinds of empathy,” says James Fallon, a neuroscientist at the University of California and author of The Psychopath Inside: A Neuroscientist’s Personal Journey into the Dark Side of the Brain. “Cognitive empathy is the ability to know what other people are feeling, and emotional empathy is the kind where you feel what they’re feeling.” Autistic people can be very empathetic — they feel other people’s pain — but are less able to recognise the cues we read easily, the smiles and frowns that tell us what someone is thinking. Psychopaths are often the opposite: they know what you’re feeling, but don’t feel it themselves. “This all gives certain psychopaths a great advantage, because they can understand what you’re thinking, it’s just that they don’t care, so they can use you against yourself.” (Chillingly, psychopaths are particularly adept at detecting vulnerability. A 2008 study that asked participants to remember virtual characters found that those who scored highly for psychopathy had a near perfect recognition for sad, unsuccessful females, but impaired memory for other characters.)
Psychopaths can work very quickly, and can have an apparent IQ higher than it really is, because they’re not inhibited by moral concerns
Fallon himself is a case in point. In 2005, he was looking at brain scans of psychopathic murderers, while on another study, of Alzheimer’s, he was using scans of his own family’s brains as controls. In the latter pile, he found something strange. “You can’t tell just from a brain scan whether someone’s a psychopath,” he says, “but you can make a good guess at the personality traits they’ll have.” He describes a great loop that starts in the front of the brain including the parahippocampal gyrus and the amygdala and other regions tied to emotion and impulse control and empathy. Under certain circumstances they would light up dramatically on a normal person’s MRI scan, but would be darker on a psychopath’s.
“I saw one that was extremely abnormal, and I thought this is someone who’s way off. It looked like the murderers I’d been looking at,” he says. He broke the anonymisation code in case it had been put into the wrong pile. When he did, he discovered it was his own brain. “I kind of blew it off,” he says. “But later, some psychiatrist friends of mine went through my behaviours, and they said, actually, you’re probably a borderline psychopath.”
Speaking to him is a strange experience; he barely draws breath in an hour, in which I ask perhaps three questions. He explains how he has frequently put his family in danger, exposing his brother to the deadly Marburg virus and taking his son trout-fishing in the African countryside knowing there were lions around. And in his youth, “if I was confronted by authority — if I stole a car, made pipe bombs, started fires — when we got caught by the police I showed no emotion, no anxiety.” Yet he is highly successful, driven to win. He tells me things most people would be uncomfortable saying: that his wife says she’s married to a “fun-loving, happy-go-lucky nice guy” on the one hand, and a “very dark character who she does not like” on the other. He’s pleasant, and funny, if self-absorbed, but I can’t help but think about the criteria in Hare’s PCL-R: superficial charm, lack of emotional depth, grandiose sense of self-worth. “I look like hell now, Tom,” he says — he’s 66 — “but growing up I was good-looking, six foot, 180lb, athletic, smart, funny, popular.” (Hare warns against non-professionals trying to diagnose people using his test, by the way.)
“Psychopaths do think they’re more rational than other people, that this isn’t a deficit,” says Hare. “I met one offender who was certainly a psychopath who said ’My problem is that according to psychiatrists I think more with my head than my heart. What am I supposed to do about that? Am I supposed to get all teary-eyed?’ ” Another, asked if he had any regrets about stabbing a robbery victim, replied: “Get real! He spends a few months in hospital and I rot here. If I wanted to kill him I would have slit his throat. That’s the kind of guy I am; I gave him a break.”
And yet, as Hare points out, when you’re talking about people who aren’t criminals, who might be successful in life, it’s difficult to categorise it as a disorder. “It’d be pretty hard for me to go into high-level political or economic or academic context and pick out all the most successful people and say, ’Look, I think you’ve got some brain deficit.’ One of my inmates said that his problem was that he’s a cat in a world of mice. If you compare the brainwave activity of a cat and a mouse, you’d find they were quite different.”
It would, says Hare, probably have been an evolutionarily successful strategy for many of our ancestors, and can be successful today; adept at manipulating people, a psychopath can enter a community, “like a church or a cultural organisation, saying, ’I believe the same things you do’, but of course what we have is really a cat pretending to be a mouse, and suddenly all the money’s gone.” At this point he floats the name Bernie Madoff.
This brings up the issue of treatment. “Psychopathy is probably the most pleasant-feeling of all the mental disorders,” says the journalist Jon Ronson, whose book, The Psychopath Test, explored the concept of psychopathy and the mental health industry in general. “All of the things that keep you good, morally good, are painful things: guilt, remorse, empathy.” Fallon agrees: “Psychopaths can work very quickly, and can have an apparent IQ higher than it really is, because they’re not inhibited by moral concerns.”
So psychopaths often welcome their condition, and “treating” them becomes complicated. “How many psychopaths go to a psychiatrist for mental distress, unless they’re in prison? It doesn’t happen,” says Hare. The ones in prison, of course, are often required to go to “talk therapy, empathy training, or talk to the family of the victims” — but since psychopaths don’t have any empathy, it doesn’t work. “What you want to do is say, ’Look, it’s in your own self-interest to change your behaviour, otherwise you’ll stay in prison for quite a while.’ “
It seems Hare’s message has got through to the U.K. Department of Justice: in its guidelines for working with personality-disordered inmates, it advises that while “highly psychopathic individuals” are likely to be “highly treatment resistant,” the “interventions most likely to be effective are those which focus on ’self-interest’ — what the offender wants out of life — and work with them to develop the skills to get those things in a pro-social rather than anti-social way.”
If someone’s brain lacks the moral niceties the rest of us take for granted, they obviously can’t do anything about that, any more than a colour-blind person can start seeing colour. So where does this leave the concept of moral responsibility? “The legal system traditionally asserts that all people standing in front of the judge’s bench are equal. That’s demonstrably false,” says the neuroscientist David Eagleman, author ofIncognito: The Secret Lives of the Brain. He suggests that instead of thinking in terms of blameworthiness, the law should deal with the likelihood that someone will reoffend, and issue sentences accordingly, with rehabilitation for those likely to benefit and long sentences for those likely to be long-term dangers. The PCL-R is already used as part of algorithms which categorise people in terms of their recidivism risk. “Life insurance companies do exactly this sort of thing, in actuarial tables, where they ask: ’What age do we think he’s going to die?’ No one’s pretending they know exactly when we’re going to die. But they can make rough guesses which make for an enormously more efficient system.”
Speaking to all these experts, I notice they all talk about psychopaths as “them,” almost as a different species, although they make conscious efforts not to. There’s something uniquely troubling about a person who lacks emotion and empathy; it’s the stuff of changeling stories, the Midwich Cuckoos, Hannibal Lecter. “You know kids who use a magnifying glass to burn ants, thinking, this is interesting,” says Hare. “Translate that to an adult psychopath who treats a person that way. It is chilling.” At one stage Ronson suggests I speak to another well-known self-described psychopath, a woman, but I can’t bring myself to. I find the idea unsettling, as if he’d suggested I commune with the dead.
http://www.pubcare.uu.se/Nyheter/?tarContentId=308473&languageId=1
Shame on you!
When facing kind , weak and innocent people, you abuse and torture them to death ;however, when encountering gang, mafia, you are overtaken by misgivings and fear. (瞻前顾后， 畏首畏尾)
News tell me.
Chrisitans took the low to court because they wanted to deny service to people based upon their sexuality among other things. SEE how it turns out here;
An excerpt from the following article;
"As the anti-balaka responded, he added, children were no longer caught in the crossfire but deliberately targeted. "There were bullets in the heads and chests of children. It's not possible they were there by accident. It's as if people are trying to finish off another race. It's about extreme revenge and it's brutal."
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/10/central-african-republic-christian-militias-revenge
I think it is easy to understand that These modern Christians would kill children, their god did it, and he isnt stopping them from killing those children, so it must be 'alright'...Right???
http://www.naturalnews.com/044464_cell_towers_EMF_pollution_mental_confusion.html#ixzz2x7J8iWWi
http://www.examiner.com/article/tvs-used-to-stalk-targeted-individuals-inside-their-homes
http://www.electrosensitivesociety.com/2010/04/01/electrosensitivity-uk/
1. Secretary-General’s message for victims
“I urge all Member States to accede to and fully implement the Convention against Torture and support the United Nations Voluntary Fund for Victims of Torture. Let us work together to end torture throughout the world and ensure that countries provide reparation for victims.”
http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2013/sgsm15131.doc.htm
2. Both Mr. Prime Minister of Canada and Mr. Attorney General of Canada stated on behalf of the Government for victims.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYsUbSK075s
3. UN human rights chief Navi Pillay’s message for torturers:
"Torturers, and their superiors, need to hear the following message loud and clear: however powerful you are today, there is a strong chance that sooner or later you will be held to account for your inhumanity." Pillay said. “ Torture is an extremely serious crime, and in certain circumstances can amount to a war crime, a crime against humanity or genocide."
4. Will Toronto Police, Canadian torturers stop their inhuman acts of torture?
5. Are these or those torturers not afraid of anything, like international law and international society? No, absolutely not. But, they have a set of measures or methods to deal with them.
This link, maybe you can’t open it. I don’t know how to solve it. They are now hacking everything. It is not necessary for me to show the evidence I have.
Canadian torture victim
Robin Yan
07/04/2014
Check this out! You hear a lot about the rift between christians and Transhumanism, but heris a group taking aNew Perspective! We might have something to learn from them!!!
https://www.facebook.com/groups/14798935435/?id=10153988921655436
In the course of my torture, I have willingly exposed myself to information available on the subject of targeting, remote torture with advanced electromagnetic and scalar weapons systems, and gang stalking. The information consists of input and contributions by fellow remotely tortured, targeted and gang stalked individuals found on this website and other websites addressing the same issues. The information consists of official documents about some of the electromagnetic weapons systems, their application (military and civilian) from military websites. The information consists of professional and academic papers on neuroscience (e.g. Dr. Persinger's papers, etc) and professional and academic papers on nanotechnologies. The information consists of books (e.g. Dr. Doug Beason, Ph.D; Dr. Duncan; Dr. Begich; etc...). The information consists of a historical record on non-consentual human experimentation in the United States, including files of congressional hearings. And so on and so forth...
From all these, I have benefited much from the experience of others and have learned a lot. But the learning process has required that I apply some guiding principles in how I process the information. Learn what to discard, and what to retain. What to further explore. And this is the summary of JUST ONE of the things I have learned:
Some (so called conspiracy theorists) argue that the government is behind these abuses. Some refute this.
My position:
I listen to what everyone has to say but do not force or compel others to see things my way. They probably have reasons for arriving at their conclusions, and while reasons may be flawed, they are never invalid. I happen to believe that the government/military or some agencies are wholely responsible for my torture. The reasons are that:
a) In the post 911 era, the prospect of multiple aircraft (including helicopters) surveilling my every single movement, 24/7, for almost 5 yrs now WITHOUT the government granting flying licenses to the aircraft, and knowing about the reasons the aircraft need to surveil, are ZERO. BTW, the aircraft can be seen by others as well so this is not a figment of my imagination.
b) The chances that my blood would develop an ability to have light-emitting objects when viewed under a microscope, when the head of the NIH advised a group of medical leaders to "ignore" any "UBOs" (unidentified bright objects) if they happen to find them inside a patient, (See ICAART DVD), suggests that there exists technologies whose capabilities to infuse/implant photonic/optic microdevices into unwitting victims' bodies, are both RECOGNIZED and EXPECTED to show up in such affected individuals.
c) An international organization that performs preliminary scans on targets found numerous frequency emissions from my head and body on June 30, 2012. The frequency emissions just happened to be in the range alloted to the military. No one else has application access to these frequencies except the parties that they are alloted to by the assigning agency. Any unauthorized access would constitute an act of war against the United States.
d)The relentless DESTRUCTION OF, AND OUTRIGHT THEFT, of microdevices my body is doused with, which include photonic crystals of all shape and form; nanofibers of various classes; official papers from military websites on the wireless, electromagnetic technologies; academic and professional papers on deleterious effects of some of these technologies on the human body; documentation of my barbaric torture with nanodevices and more... Non-governmental involvement would be happy to LEAVE THE MILITARY DOCUMENTS ALONE in order to shift the blame to someone else but this is not the case.
e) Constant character assassination and smears on FFFCHS' 'Comments' page (Pls go read this to see how far they will go to damage victims who are EFFECTIVELY EXPOSING these crimes). These tactics are consistent with some of the documents released in the Greenwald/Poitras/Scahill website on tactics used to discredit targets. Apart from Dennis Robinson, who it is alleged by the criminals is under my pay ( ! ), and whom they implore to kick me out of his website, no other target there receives this much attention. The degree of bigotry of these criminals is of such an extent that they refuse to believe that I am African and claim that I am a caucasian with blue eyes who HAS SOMEONE ELSE WRITING MY POSTS ! Never mind that many TIs in Oregon who have seen me in person, and who voted to have me write a letter to Senator Ron Wyden know the truth...
f) My body turns on street walking signals on "smart" street lights when my I am within activating range of some circuitry on the street light that interacts with illegal implants in my body. One of the companies making these is Intellistreet. Older street lights do not react to my body in this way; they remain silent as with many other non-implanted persons. The body can also turn these lights off, on, dim them or intensify the light. One of Intellistreet's contracts is with Homeland Security, according to documents.
g) This list could go on until it is a thick as the thickest book known...And this is just ON ONE AREA. But I must stop here. Library time where I write this is limited.
Conclusion:
Who I believe to be behind my torture has a sound basis in fact. Who someone else believes is behind THEIR torture has their own reasons that may or may not coincide with mine. But IT IS NOT MY PLACE to dismiss their belief or to try to command them to see things my way. Nor IS IT THEIR PLACE to dismiss my belief or try to command me to see things their way. I have to listen to them, not judge, nor recommend to them that they see otherwise. Else one comes across as having something VESTED in swaying others one way or the other.
Best to you.
You can't watch the tv or radio without getting harassed to some extent and going out too . I have found some positive digital songs to try to cheer me up.
I realized i am being a spoiled brat while in the hospital, I am trying to change but everything I do they seem to mostly dislike. I am also now seeing a psychotherapist.... The lack of not being able to distract yourself is very hard.
So what does everyone do for fun? I like walking my dog and looking at nature in my backward and playing games with my family but i would like to be with the public.
Btw anyone seen the new the AArp magazine?
there is a good article on ways to "bounce back" and article on Patrick Stewart on battling the darkness within that seems interesting for us.
Any people in Toronto, Canada who experience voice to skull electronic harassment please contact me. There are a number of us here trying to figure out a solution to this problem. PS I do not care at all about any conspiracy theories or anti government bs. I do not even believe that the government or police are harassing average unimportant non criminal individuals this way. In any case the solution to the problem in spite the perpetrators is finding proof ( clear evidence that we are being assaulted with yet publicly unrecognized communications technology and not some nut conspiracy theorists that think aliens or some other stupid thing is doing this ) So we need to have a technical approach, demonstrate first that there is in fact a signal directed at us, second track the source and call the cops. This is very basic outline that is why it is necessary to have a large group of rational people to provide more ideas and ultimately resolve this.
