Interview with a gang stalker | Expose--
What follows on the link below is an expose on the dark side of psych-ops, presented in a 4-part video from The National Report. In this tell-all, no holes barred journalist, Janes M Agni, was given "full access," to the secrets of the perps. You'll learn why they do what they do - how they do what they do - and, more importantly-- who they do it for. [MORE: http://bit.ly/1gs87vu]
Jane M. Agni is a professional journalist residing in the rain-soaked city of Portland, Oregon. She has written for such fine websites as Modern Woman Digest and Civic Tribune. Her book entitled "The States Of Shame: Living As A Liberated Womyn In America" appeared on Oprah's Book Club and quickly went bestseller shortly thereafter. She's currently at work on the follow up tentatively named "Sisters Of Shame: The Why In Womyn" . Jane M. Agni now writes full-time for National Report, giving her unique perspective on the latest world events.
Replies
I agree Clair that they want gangstalking kept secret, and that's their game in gangstalking. If you know what is happening and expose it, the better. I do not agree that the purpose of gangstalking is really to destroy and make the subject or victim disappear or be disposed of in order to minimize witness, but to harass or intimidate and torture, which is part of the system of control of the perpetrators in electronic mind control technology harassment. Yes, the aware targets who expose or publicise the conduct or action will last longer, or be less stalked by the recruits.
Between the devil and the deep blue sea, eh?
I agree Carrin that you cannot be quiet or silent, and let it just passes as time passes by. You really have to bring this to the attention of the relevant humanitarian organisations and authorities, regardless they believe or not. That is right that you are keeping a record of your issues for legal purposes. Nothing will happen if victims will just chat up everyday with each other of their situations and everything that is going on around them, but hesitant to initiate proper actions against this technology or AI, maybe because they are affected badly . JOhn Finch has sent on and off his complaints to the relevant authorities or International Court, and he is really taking real action. Maybe these relevant authorities or International Court are just collating more complaints and evidences to substantiate this.
Yes, stalker or gangstalkers are recruited, solicited, and networked by the main perps or mastermind with the main purpose to harass and torture the targets. Yes, they tried to stop me in 2012 because my complaint was running, but it did not stop me. In 2013, gangstalking had stopped. Since this year, I do not get gangstalked, but sometimes a single person or you might call stalker wanting to befriend me while I am walking in the shopping centres. Yes, we are a distraction to them that's why we are targeted. But others are chosen randomly as human experiment of the mind control human experiment technology. YOu said you are retaliating because they are attacking you. How do you retaliate with your perps?
Thank you Sue and yes, whatever testimony you have AND (important) want the Swiss and French press and politician to read, do send it in order to raise even more awareness.
By the way, i got great news: the activism has reached the American Press, and not just any (i will come with more details) and the pirate party international as well the swiss pirate party. Very positive feedbacks.
And i am all smiley writing these lines. :)
Great news Cedric.
Clair, I understand that gangstalking or stalking is not an offence in your country that’s why they did not advise you of any legal avenues available. Here, gangstalking or stalking falls under criminal offence under the criminal law. The law enforcement authorities have jurisdiction over this offence here. Regardless you have evidence or not, your complaint for being stalked or gangstalked would be investigated as part of the due process of law and will not regard you as insane, and if they did not find sufficient evidence to incriminate the accused, the law enforcement authorities will not charge him or them to prosecute in the court of criminal division. It is the law enforcement authorities that charge and prosecute the accused in criminal court for criminal offence, and not the complainant under the criminal law. Criminal law/offence is different and separate from civil law/offence, and handled and process differently. Law enforcement authorities do not have jurisdiction or authority over civil law/offences. There are caselaw here of stalking heard and decisioned by the court with evidences of course. In the case of DEW attacks, as there is no law that covers that under the criminal law here and no actual evidence to substantiate that kind of technology and offence, the law enforcement authorities could regard you as nuts, and might refer you to psychiatrist or mental hospital if you complained about it to them. On the other hand, the targets or victims have the right to directly file civil complaints or take civil actions for civil wrongs (Tort Law) (Civil Law) on stalking for the harm or detriments it caused, and for torture, harm, abuse, and other damages or detriments as a consequence of the DEW attacks on you. The evidence that you have to prove here in stalking is that you were stalked by the defendant and there is causal connection or nexus with the harm or detriments you incurred and the action/conduct subjected to you. In the case of DEW, you have to prove that you incurred or suffered torture, harm, and abuse and other damages or detriments and there is causal connection or nexus with DEW attacks, and that the technology really exists and caused by the defendant. John Finch has not yet received the latest reply from ICC re his revised complaints till now. I wonder if they have reconsidered his revised complaints.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next