That antimatter could be, if there is another dimension or other dimensions for reasons of force like gravity or other forces unknown as those generated from the interaction on the universe with other universes or multiple universes achieve balance with the interaction of matter and antimatter, may not be in the same terms of what we would consider the interplay of forces that exist in our space time, the balance would be achieved by the concept of interacting universes at the same time, this only with the theory of parallel universes (theory string), but with the existence of separate universes could operate differently and that the balance would work in universes that are balanced by interaction of matter, antimatter and forces.
If we consider the existence of universes interacting but not percibidles and who may be in space-time nearly equal to those of our space-time but do not perceive the existence of atoms would be almost in the same space time (although the existence matter is different in their conception of existence of matter) and quantum mechanics official similarly to the quantum mechanics of the universe we observe.
Because the hypothetical model can be related universes in which the universes coexist and each universe has similar characteristics.
If matter exists in the dimension in which we exist, the possibility of the existence of other universes would not be impossible, but also the interaction between these forces could produce which would affect not only matter, if not the forces of interaction of matter the universe in which we exist with different conceptions of the universe and the interactions of matter in the Multiverse theory and string theory.
Multiverse Theory.
In the theory of Multiverse hypotheses conceive normally talk about the possibility of universes that coexist with the known universe, the explanation of parallel universes is complex and that the only reality we can rationalize is that which surrounds us.
As additional development for the explanation of possible universes and how these spaces may exist in reality we normally think of as the classic definitions of psychology, personality conceived from two points of view. The Ego is the real me how the individual is conceived and the individual's ability to project for their own purposes and without the possibility of looking at society as part of their existence.
The Alter Ego that explains how the individual relates through hedging with society, mind the subject creates its own identity that allows this relationship, but to relate hidden his true identity and intentions.
To explain the existence of multiverses, the possibility that between Ego and Alter Ego The different configurations exist and how are you affecting the environment and allows us to be from a philosophical point of view, try variations of alternate universes or worlds that can be of fitness coexist with us, the possibility of conceiving a reality does not tell us whether this is completely real, the possibility of rationalizing the reality from a static point of view, the results in the psyche. Furthermore rationalized as static reality, does not explain how man can explain the existence of parallel universes. However, from the astrophysical point of view it is thought that these universes exist, but in states that are not fully equal to those we see in this universe.
Spaces in the psyche between ego and alter ego, provide a space where the impossibility of measuring resemble the multiverse theory, as the psyche can only be measured through fields and quantum mechanics. The psyche could affect the reality of the universe to which we belong from the standpoint of physical and philosophical, but this involvement is not real because the perception is not tangible. The infinite configurations of the psyche in coexistence with reality allows the existence of universes, but these are influenced by the different reactions of being both from a physical standpoint and from the point of view of philosophy as the philosophical understanding of existing knowledge generator .
Bibliography.
1. Sherman SM, Guillery RW. Exploring the thalamus. San Diego: Academic Press, 2001.
2. Carpenter MB. Neuroanatomy. Fundamentals. Buenos Aires: Pan American Medical, 1994.
3. HJ Ralston. Thalamus. In Wong-Riley MMT, ed. Secrets of the Neurociencias.Mexico: McGraw-Hill, 2001. p. 275-81.
4. Amaral DG. Functional organization of perception and movement. In Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM, eds. Principles of Neuroscience.
Madrid: McGraw-Hill, 2001. p. 337-48.
5. Elliot HC. Textbook of Neuroanatomy. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1969.
6. Afifi AK, Bergman RA. Functional neuroanatomy. Text and atlas. Mexico: McGraw-Hill, 1999.
7. Morel A, Magnin M, Jeanmonod D. And stereotactic atlas Multiarchitectonic of the human thalamus. J Comp Neurol 1997, 387: 588-630.
8. Hirai T, Jones EG. A new parcellation of the human thalamus on the basis of histochemical staining. Brain Res Rev 1989, 14: 1-34.
9. Steriade M, Deschenes M. The thalamus as a neuronal oscillator. Brain Res Rev 1984; 8: 1-63.
10. Lorente de No R. Cerebral cortex: architecture, intracortical connections, motor projections. In Fulton J, ed. Physiology of the nervous
system. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1938. p. 291-325.
11. Macchi, G. The intralaminar system revisited. In Minciacchi D, Molinari M, Macchi MG, Jones EG, eds. Thalamic networks for relay and
modulation. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1993. p. 175-84.
12. Jones EG. Viewpoint: the core and matrix of thalamic organization.Neuroscience 1998, 85: 331-45.
13. Stephens RB, Stilwell DL. Arteries and veins of the human brain. Springfield IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1969.
14. Tatu L, Moulin TH, Bogousslavsky J, Duvernoy H. Arterial territories of the human brain. Neurology 1998, 50: 1699-708.
15. Purves D, Augustine GJ, Fitzpatrick D, Katz LC, LaMantia AS, McNamara JO. Call for Neuroscience. Madrid: Pan American Medical;
2001.
16. Ghika J, Bogousslavsky J, Maeder P, Regli F. The 'Jerky distonic unsteady hand': a delayed motor syndrome in posterior thalamic
infarctions. J Neurol 1994, 241: 537-42.
17. Lee MS, Marsden CD. Movement disorders Following lesions of the thalamus or subthalamic region. Mov Disord 1994, 9: 493-507.
18. Lee MS, Kim YD, Yang JW, Lyoo CH, Oh SH, Kim HS. Clinical and anatomical Factors Associated with thalamic dyskinesias. J Neurol Sci
2001, 182: 137-42.
19. Steriade M, Parent T, Hada A. Thalamic nucleus reticularis thalami of Projections of cat: a study using retrograde transport of horseradish
peroxidase and fluorescent tracers. J Comp Neurol 1984; 229: 531-47.
20. Royce GJ, Bromley S, Gracco C. Subcortical Projections on the centromedian and parafascicular thalamic nuclei in the cat. J Comp Neurol
1991, 306: 129-55.
21. Parent A. Extrinsic connections of the basal ganglia. Trends Neurosci 1990, 13: 254-8.
22. Groenewegen HJ, Berendse HW. The specificity of the 'nonspecific' midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei. Trends Neurosci 1994, 17: 52-7.
23. MV Perea. Fundamentals of Neuropsychology. Psychobiology of the movement. Salamanca: Salamanca University, 1989.
24. Bhatnagar SC, Andy OJ. Neuroscience for the study of communication disorders. Barcelona: Masson-Williams & Wilkins, 1997.
25. Gaffan D, Parker A. Mediodorsal thalamic function in scene memory in rhesus monkeys. Brain 2000, 123: 816-27.
26. Morison RS, Dempsey EW. A study of thalamocortical relations. Am J Physiol 1942; 135: 281-92.
27. Jasper HH. Diffuse projection systems: the integrative action of the thalamic reticular system. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1949, 1: 405-19.
28. Moruzzi G, Magoun HW. Brain stem reticular formation and activation of the EEG. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1949; 1: 455-73.
29. Steriade M, McCormick DA, Sejnowski TJ. Thalamocortical Oscillations in the sleeping and aroused brain. Science 1993, 262: 679-85.
30. Destexhe A, Contreras D, Sejnowski TJ, Steriade M. A model of spindle rhythmicity in the isolated thalamic reticular nucleus. J Neurophysiol 1994, 72: 803-18.
31. Hofle N, Paus T, Rutens D, Fiset P, Gotman J, Evans AC, et al. Covariation of regional cerebral blood flow with Delta and spindle activity slow wave sleep DURING in humans. J Neurosci 1997, 17: 4800-8.
32. Paus T, Zatorre RJ, Hofle N, Caramanos Z, Gotman J, Pretides M, et al. Time-related Changes in Neural arousal and attention systems Underlying During The performance of and auditory vigilance test. J Cogn
Neurosci 1997, 9: 392-408.
33. Kinomura S, Larsson J, Gulyás B, Roland PE. Activation by attention of the human reticular formation and thalamic intralaminar nuclei. Science 1996, 271: 512-4.
34. Fiset P, Paus T, TH Daloze, Plourde G, Meurte P, Bonhomme V, et al. Brain Mechanisms of propofol-induced loss of consciousness in human: a positron emission tomographic study. J Neurosci 1999, 19:
5506-13.
35. Chudasama Y, Muir JL. Visual attention in the rat: a role for the prelimbic cortex and thalamic nuclei? Behav Neurosci 2001; 115: 417-28.
36. Watson RT, Heilman KM. Thalamic Neglect. Neurology 1979, 29: 690-4.
37. Graff-Radford NR, Damasio H, Yamada T, Eslinger PJ, Damasio AR.
Nonhemorrhagic thalamic infarction. Brain 1985, 108: 485-516.
38. AM Barrett, RL Schwartz, GP Crucian, Kim M, Heilman KM. Attentional grasp in far extrapersonal space after thalamic infarction. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38: 778-84.
39. Penfield W, Roberts L. Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1959.
40. Mateer C. Asymmetric effects of thalamic stimulation on rate of speech. Neuropsychologia 1978, 16: 497-9.
41. Bhatnagar SC, Andy OJ. Alleviation of Acquired stuttering with thalamic stimulation centremedian human. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1989; 52: 1182-4.
42. Johnson MD, Ojemann GA. The role of the human thalamus in language and memory: Evidence from electrophysiological studies. Brain Cogn 2000; 42: 218-30.
43. Crosson B. Subcortical functions in language and memory. New York: Guilford Press, 1992.
44. Ojemann GA. Asymmetric function of the thalamus in man. Ann N Y Acad Sci U S A 1977, 299: 380-96.
45. Bentivoglio M, Aggleton JP, Mishkin M. The thalamus and memory formation. In Steriade M, Jones EG, McCormick DA, eds. Thalamus. Experimental and clinical aspects. Oxford: Elsevier Science, 1997. p. 689-720.
46. Weinberger NM, McGaugh JL, Lynch G. Memory systems of the humanbrain: animal and human cognitive processes. New York: Guilford Press, 1985.
47. Guberman A, Stuss DT. The syndrome of bilateral paramedian thalamic infarction. Neurology 1983, 33: 540-6.
48. NR Graff-Radford, Tranel D, Van Hoese GW, Brandt JP. Diencephalic amnesia. Brain 1990, 113: 1-25.
Replies