A) ADBUSTERS STARTED THE OCCUPY WALL STREET MOVEMENT, AND ADBUSTERS ARE INTERNATIONAL SOCIALISTS. ALL THE PEOPLE ARE DOING IS GETTING INJURED AND COSTING TAXPAYERS MONEY. EVERYONE KNOWS THAT POLICE BRUTALITY IS A REALITY. THESE TIRESOME DISRUPTIONS ARE NOT CHANGING LAWS OR DEEPLY AFFECTING THE WAY THAT BUSINESS HAPPENS -- IT'S A FAKEOUT.
COINTELPRO WAS ONE OF THE FIRST CONSPIRACIES UNCOVERED AS BEINGMADE TO INFILTRATE COUNTERCULTURE MOVEMENTS AND TRICK THE MEMBERS INTO "FUCKING UP" ON PURPOSE TO DESPIRIT AND DEMORALIZE THE SINCERE AND SLOW DOWN TO ALMOST NOTHING THE REAL EFFORTS TO RAISE AWARENESS. OWS -- ONE WORLD STATE! THESE INTERNATIONAL SOCIALISTS ARE COMPLETELY FAKE.
SINCERE PEOPLE WOULD USE THE EXISTING CHANNELS TO DO THINGS.
INSINCERE PEOPLE WOULD BOTHER COPS, MAKE A PUBLIC MESS AND CAUSE MISUNDERSTANDINGS AND DISRUPT THE FLOW OF CIVIL EXISTANCE WITHOUT ACTUALLY CHANGING ANY EXISTING LAWS.
B) SEDITION OR PLOTTING TO OVERTHROW THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT MIGHT BE PERCIEVED AS A RIGHT OR WRONG THING TO DO. BUT IF PEOPLE HAVE NO BETTER IDEAS -- OR IF THEY THINK THEIR BETTER IDEA IS A SOCIALIST GOVERNMENT?
THAT'S WHAT LENIN AND STALIN AND TROTSKY THOUGHT, AND RUSSIA IS STILL RECOVERING -- AND THEY STILL HAVE A POLICE STATE, TOO.
THEY ARE POSEURS AND SHOULD DO HARD TIME. IF THEY ARE GONNA COST TAXPAYING CITIZENS MONEY THEN THEY SHOULD SIT IN JAIL AND PAY SOCIETY BACK FOR WASTING TIME, ESPECIALLY SINCE THEY OFFER NO ALTERNATIVES TO BUSINESS AS USUAL. IF THEY HAVE SUCH IDEAS, WHY HAVE THEY FAILED TO PRESENT THEM TO THE WORLD?
IF THEIR ANSWER IS "BECAUSE THE SYSTEM IS SO POWERFUL AND HAS BLOCKED US," THAT'S A WEAK EXCUSE FOR CREATING PERMANENT REVOLUTION.
WHAT THEY ARE DOING IS MAKING COPS MORE AGGRO AND PARANOID AND MAKING LIFE HARDER FOR EVERYONE -- DEFECATING IN PUBLIC PLACES AND ACTUALLY MAKING LIFE HARDER FOR THE HOMELESS PEOPLE RATHER THAN RALLYING FOR THEIR CAUSE AND HELPING THEM? ALL THE SIGNS OF PETTY LITTLE STREET DICTATORS INVOLVED IN NOT HELPING PEOPLE OF THE LOWER CLASSES WHILE FORCING THE SYSTEM TO FURTHER TRAIN COPS TO DEAL WITH STREET DOLTS. THIS FORCES THE SYSTEM TO PUT MORE TAX RESOURCES INTO RIOT CONTROL FOR COPS...
ALL THIS IS PERMANENT REVOLUTION. IT IS NOT INTENDED TO RESOLVE, BUT TO ESCALATE TENSIONS AND DIVIDE THE PEOPLE JUST AS MUCH AS THE EVIL RICH'S DISREGARD OF THE IMPOVERISHED AND FORCING OF CLASS DIVIDERS BASED ON RICH AND POOR.
RATIONAL ACTION CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN THIS SITUATION OF CONTROL BY THE ILLUMINATI/NWO, WHO LAUGH COLDLY AT THE MISERY OF THOSE THEY HAVE VIRTUALLY ENSLAVED ECONOMICALLY AND WITH SECRET PLANS LIKE COINTELPRO AND MKULTRA.
IRRATIONAL ACTION THAT IS ORGANIZED AND LED BY A FEW (LIKE THE SELF SERVING TOTALITARIANS OF ADBUSTERS MAGAZINE) IS JUST THE SAME SORT OF STUFF THAT THE WOBBLIES HAVE ALWAYS DONE FOR THE WORKING CLASSES -- GET US IN TROUBLE, GET US BEATEN UP AND DO NOTHING TO ALTER THE IMBALANCE OF POWER.
NOTHING. 'WOB DICTATORS HAVE DONE NOTHING FOR THE WORKER ALL THROUGH THE 20TH CENTURY EXCEPT GET PEOPLE HURT. FIGHTING FOR ONE PERCENT WAGE INCREASES EVERY TEN YEARS IS BASICALLY NOTHING WHEN PEOPLE GET HURT, THE RICH KEEP ON GETTING RICH AND MANIPULATING THE SYSTEM EVERY GENERATION -- IN THE SAME WAYS THAT THEY DID BEFORE, RELYING ON PUBLIC UNAWARENESS OF THE BAD THINGS THAT 'WOBS DID BEFORE TO GET WORKERS INJURED AND NOT ACTUALLY GET THEM OUT FROM UNDER THE RULING CLASSES.
OWS = ONE WORLD STATE = INTERNATIONAL SOCIALISM.
NAZI=NATIONAL SOCIALIST -- INTERNATIONAL SOCIALIST...FIGURE IT OUT!!!
THE SUBTLE CLASSISM THAT THIS WOBBLY INITIATIVE SHOWS WHEN THE ACTUAL HOMELESS AND DESTITUTE ARE SPAT UPON AND RIDICULED AND OWS WOBBLIES SAY 'THIS ISN'T YOUR MOVEMENT, GET AWAY FROM OUR FOOD' AS HAS BEEN RECORDED IN NUMEROUS AMERICAN CITIES.
SMASH THE STATE.
1925 - Freedom of Expression
Gitlow v. New York
Gitlow’s conviction for distributing a pamphlet calling for the overthrow of the government was upheld. But the ACLU’s first Supreme Court landmark established that the 14th Amendment “incorporates" the First Amendment’s free speech clause and therefore applies to the states.
1927 - Freedom of Expression
Whitney v. California
Whitney’s conviction for membership in a group advocating the overthrow of the state was upheld. But Justice Brandeis laid the groundwork for modern First Amendment law in a separate opinion, in which he argued that under a “clear and present danger" test, the strong presumption should be in favor of “more speech, not enforced silence."
1931 - Freedom of Expression
Stromberg v. California
A California law leading to the conviction of a communist who displayed a red flag was overturned on the grounds that the law was vague, in violation of the First Amendment.
1932 - Right to Fair Procedures
Powell v. Alabama
This appeal by the “Scottsboro Boys" – eight African Americans wrongfully accused of raping two white women – was the first time constitutional standards were applied to state criminal proceedings. The poor performance of their lawyers at the trial deprived them of their 6th Amendment right to \effective counsel.
1935 - Right to Fair Procedures
Patterson v. Alabama
A second “Scottsboro Boys" decision held that excluding black people from the jury list denied defendant a fair trial.
1937 - Freedom of Association
DeJonge v. Oregon
A conviction under a state criminal syndicalism statute for merely attending a peaceful Communist Party rally was deemed a violation of free speech rights.
1938 - Free Excercise of Religion
Lovell v. Griffin
In this case on behalf of Jehovah’s Witnesses, a Georgia ordinance prohibiting the distribution of “literature of any kind" without a City Manager’s permit, was deemed a violation of religious liberty.
1939 - Freedom of Expression
Hague v. CIO
Invalidating the repressive actions of Jersey City’s anti-union Mayor, “Boss" Hague, the Supreme Court ruled that freedom of assembly applies to public forums, such as “streets and parks."
1941 - Equality Under the Law
Edwards v. California
An “anti-Okie" law that made it a crime to transport poor people into California was struck down as a violation of the right to interstate travel.
1943 - Free Excercise of Religion
West Virginia v. Barnette
Compelling Jehovah’s Witness children to salute the American flag against their religious beliefs was unconstitutional.
1944- Equality Under the Law
Smith v. Allwright
This early civil rights victory invalidated Texas’ “white primary" as a violation of the right to vote under the 15th Amendment.
1946 - Freedom of Expression
Hannegan v. Esquire
In a blow against censorship, this decision limited the Postmaster General’s power to withhold mailing privileges for magazines containing “offensive" material.
1947 - Separation of Church and State
Everson v. Board of Education
Justice Black’s pronouncement that, “In the words of Jefferson, the Clause… was intended to erect a ‘wall of separation’ between church and State..." was the Court’s first major utterance on the meaning of the Establishment Clause.
1948 - Equality Under the Law
Shelley v. Kraemer
This major civil rights victory invalidated restrictive covenants, or contractual agreements among white homeowners not to sell their houses to people of color.
1949 - Freedom of Expression
Terminiello v. Chicago
In this exoneration of a priest convicted of disorderly conduct for giving a racist, anti-semitic speech, Justice William O. Douglas stated, “the function of free speech under our system of government is to invite dispute."
1951 - Freedom of Expression
Kunz v. New York
The Supreme Court ruled that a permit to speak in a public forum could not be denied because a person’s speech had, on a former occasion, resulted in civil disorder.
1952 - Right to Fair Procedures
Rochin v. California
Reversing the conviction of a man whose stomach had been forcibly pumped for drugs by police, the Court ruled that the 14th Amendment’s Due Process Clause outlaws “conduct that shocks the conscience."
Burstyn v. Wilson - Freedom of Expression
Overturning its own 1915 decision, the Supreme Court decided New YorkState’s refusal to license the film “The Miracle" because it was sacreligious violated the First Amendment.
1954 - Equality Under the Law
Brown v. Board of Education
One of the century’s most significant Court decisions declared racially segregated schools unconstitutional, wiping out the “separate but equal" doctrine announced in the infamous 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson decision.
1957 - Freedom of Association
Watkins v. United States
The investigative powers of the House UnAmerican Activities Committee were curbed on First Amendment grounds when the Court reversed a labor leader’s conviction for refusing to answer questions about membership in the Communist Party.
1958 - Right to Fair Procedures
Kent v. Dulles
The State Department overstepped its authority in denying a passport to artist Rockwell Kent, who refused to sign a “noncommunist affidavit," since the right to travel is protected by the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
Speiser v. Randall - Freedom of Expression
ACLU lawyer Lawrence Speiser successfully argued his challenge to a California law requiring that veterans sign a loyalty oath to qualify for a property tax exemption.
Trop v. Dulles - Right to Fair Procedures
Stripping an American of his citizenship for being a deserter in World War II was deemed cruel and unusual punishment, in violation of the Eighth Amendment.
1959 - Right to Fair Procedures
Smith v. California
A bookseller could not be found guilty of selling obscene material unless it was proven that he or she was familiar with the contents of the book.
1961 - Right to Fair Procedures
Mapp v. Ohio
The Fourth Amendment’s Exclusionary Rule – barring the introduction of illegally seized evidence in a criminal trial – first applied to federal law enforcement officers in 1914, applied to state and local police as well.
Poe v. Ullman - Right to Privacy
This unsuccessful challenge to Connecticut’s ban on the sale of trial contraceptives set the stage for the 1965 Griswold decision. Justice John Harlan argued in dissent that the law was “an intolerable invasion of privacy in the conduct of one of the most intimate concerns of an individual’s private life."
1962 - Separation of Church & State
Engel v. Vitale
In striking down the New York State Regent’s “nondenominational" school prayer, the Court declared “it is no part of the business of government to compose official prayers."
1963 - Separation of Church & State
Abingdon School District v. Schempp
Building on Engel, the Court struck down Pennsylvania’s in-school Bible-reading law as a violation of the First Amendment.
Gideon v. Wainwright - Right to Fair Procedures
An indigent drifter from Florida made history when, in a handwritten petition, he persuaded the Court that poor people charged with a felony had the right to a state-appointed lawyer.
1964 - Right to Fair Procedures
Escobedo v. Illinois
Invoking the Sixth Amendment right to counsel, the Court threw out the confession of a man whose repeated requests to see his lawyer, throughout many hours of police interrogation, were ignored.
New York Times v. Sullivan - Freedom of the Press
Public officials cannot recover damages for defamation unless they prove a newspaper impugned them with “actual malice." A city commissioner in Montgomery, Alabama sued over publication of a full-page ad paid for by civil rights activists.
Jacobellis v. Ohio - Freedom of Expression
The Court overturned a theater owner’s conviction for showing the film “The Lovers," by Louis Malle, and Justice Potter Stewart admitted that although he could not define “obscenity," he “knew it when he saw it."
Reynolds v. Sims - Equality Under the Law
This historic civil rights decision, which applied the “one person, one vote" rule to state legislative districts, was regarded by Chief Justice Earl Warren as the most important decision of his tenure.
Baggett v. Bullitt - Freedom of Expression
A Washington State loyalty oath required of state employees was held void for vagueness in violation of the First Amendment.
Carroll v. Princess Anne County - Freedom of Expression
A county’s decision to ban a rally without notifying the rally organizers of the injunction proceeding was invalidated on free speech grounds.
1965
U.S. v. Seeger - Free Excercise of Religion
One of the first anti-Vietnam War decisions extended conscientious objector status to those who do not believe in a supreme being, but who oppose war based on sincere beliefs that are equivalent to religious objections.
Lamont v. Postmaster General - Freedom of Expression
Struck down a Cold War-era law that required the Postmaster General to detain and destroy all unsealed mail from abroad deemed to be “communist political propaganda" – unless the addressee requested delivery in writing.
Griswold v. Connecticut - Right to Privacy
Invalidated a Connecticut law forbidding the use of contraceptives on the ground that a right of “marital privacy," though not specifically guaranteed in the Bill of Rights, is protected by “several fundamental constitutional guarantees."
1966 - Right to Fair Procedures
Miranda v. Arizona
The Court held that a suspect in police custody has a Sixth Amendment right to counsel and a Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, and established the “Miranda warnings" requirement that police inform suspects of their rights before interrogating them.
Bond v. Floyd - Freedom of Expression
The Georgia state legislature was ordered to seat state senator-elect Julian Bond who had been denied his seat for publicly supporting Vietnam War draft resisters. Criticizing U.S. foreign policy, said the Court, does not violate a legislator’s oath to uphold the Constitution.
1967
Keyishian v. Board of Regents - Freedom of Expression
Struck down a Cold War-era law that required public school teachers to sign a loyalty oath. Public employment is not a “privilege" to which government can attach whatever conditions it pleases. In re Gault Established specific due process requirements for state delinquency proceedings and stated, for the first time, the broad principle that young persons have constitutional rights.
Loving v. Virginia - Equality Under the Law
Invalidated the anti-miscegenation laws of Virginia and 15 other southern states. Criminal bans on interracial marriage violate the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause and “the freedom to marry," which the Court called “one of the basic civil rights of man" (sic).
Whitus v. Georgia - Equality Under the Law
Successful challenge to the systematic exclusion of African Americans from grand and petit juries. In the county in question, no black person had ever served on a jury in spite of the fact that 45% of the population was black.
1968
Epperson v. Arkansas - Separation of Church & State
Arkansas’ ban on teaching “that mankind ascended or descended from a lower order of animals" was a violation of the First Amendment, which forbids official religion.
Levy v. Louisiana - Separation of Church & State
Invalidated a state law that denied an illegitimate child the right to recover damages for a parent’s death. The ruling established the principle that the accidental circumstance of a child’s birth does not justify discrimination.
King v. Smith - Equality Under the Law
Invalidated the “man in the house" rule that denied welfare to children whose unmarried mothers lived with men. The decision benefited an estimated 500,000 poor children who had previously been excluded from aid.
Washington v. Lee - Equality Under the Law
Alabama statutes requiring racial segregation in the state’s prisons and jails were declared unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment.
1969
Brandenburg v. Ohio - Freedom of Expression
The ACLU achieved victory in its 50-year struggle against laws punishing political advocacy. The Court agreed that the government could only penalize direct incitement to imminent lawless action, thus invalidating the Smith Act and all state sedition laws.
Tinker v. Des Moines - Freedom of Expression
Suspending public school students for wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War was unconstitutional since students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the school-house gate."
Gregory v. Chicago - Freedom of Expression
The Court unanimously overturned a conviction of disorderly conduct against Dick Gregory and others who picketed Chicago’s Mayor Daley. When disorder is created by a hostile audience, peaceful demonstrators cannot be arrested because of a “heckler’s veto."
Street v. New York - Freedom of Expression
A state law under which a man was convicted for burning the American flag to protest the assassination of civil rights leader Medgar Evers was unconstitutional.
Watts v. U.S. - Freedom of Speech
Threats against the life of the President of the U.S., if they were no more than “political hyperbole," are protected by the First Amendment.
1970 - Right to Faire Procedures
Goldberg v. Kelly
Setting in motion what has been called the “procedural due process revolution," the Court ruled that welfare recipients were entitled to notice and a hearing before the state could terminate their benefits.
1971
Cohen v. California - Freedom of Expression
Convicting an anti-war protester of disturbing the peace for wearing a jacket that bore the words, “Fuck the draft," was unconstitutional. The government cannot prohibit speech just because it is “offensive."
Organization for Better Austin v. Keefe - Freedom of Expression
An injunction against the distribution of leaflets in an entire residential suburb was struck down on the grounds that the privacy interests of the residents did not justify such a sweeping restraint.
U.S. v. New York Times - Freedom of the Press
Enjoining the press from publishing the Pentagon Papers, leaked by a former Defense Department official, was an unconstitutional prior restraint which was not justified by national security interests.
Reed v. Reed - Equality Under the Law
Struck down a state law that gave automatic preference to men over women as administrators of decedents’ estates. This was the Court’s first ruling that sex-based classifications violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.
U.S. v. Vuitch - Right to Privacy
Although the Court upheld a statute used to convict a doctor who had performed an illegal abortion, it expanded the “life and health of the woman" concept to include “psychological well-being," thereby allowing more women to obtain legal “therapeutic" abortions.
1972
Eisenstadt v. Baird - Right to Privacy
In an extension of the Court’s evolving privacy doctrine, the conviction of a reproductive rights activist who had given an unmarried Massachusetts woman a contraceptive device was reversed.
Furman v. Georgia - Right to Fair Procedures
This decision led to a four-year halt to executions nationwide when the Court ruled that existing state death penalty statutes were “arbitrary and capricious" in violation of the Eight Amendment.
1973
Frontiero v. Richardson - Equality Under the Law
Struck down a federal law that allowed a woman in the armed forces to claim her husband as a “dependent" only if he depended on her for more than half of his support, while a serviceman could claim “dependent" status for his wife regardless of actual dependency.
Holtzman v. Schlesin - Checks & Balances
The ACLU took on Rep. Elizabeth Holtzman’s lawsuit to halt the bombing of Cambodia as an unconstitutional Presidential usurpation of Congress’ authority to declare war. Although a federal order to stop the bombing was eventually overturned, the bombing was halted for a few hours.
Roe v. Wade/Doe v. Bogerlton - Checks & Balances
Recognizing a woman’s constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy, Roe erased all existing criminal abortion laws. Its companion case, Doe, established that it is the attending physician who determines, in light of all factors relevant to a woman’s well-being, whether an abortion is “necessary."
1974
Communist Party of Indiana v. Whitcomb - Freedom of Expression
Invalidated a state requirement that political parties swear that they do not advocate the violent overthrow of government as a condition of getting on the ballot.
Smith v. Goguen - Freedom of Expression
A Massachusetts state law that made it a crime to treat the American flag “contemptuously" was found by the Court to be void for vagueness.
U.S. v. Nixon - Checks & Balances
In the only amicus brief filed in this critical case, the ACLU argued: “There is no proposition more dangerous to the health of a constitutional democracy than the notion that an elected head of state is above the law and beyond the reach of judicial review." The Court agreed, and ordered Nixon to hand over crucial Watergate tapes to the Special Prosecutor.
1975
Goss v. Lopez - Right to Fair Procedure
Invalidated a state law authorizing a public school principal to suspend a student for up to ten days without a hearing. Students are entitled to notice and a hearing before a significant disciplinary action can be taken against them.
O’Connor v. Donaldson - Right to Fair Procedure
In its first “right to treatment" decision, the Court ruled that mental illness alone did not justify “simple custodial confinement" on an indefinite basis in the case of a non-violent patient who had been involuntarily held in a mental institution for 15 years.
1976 - Freedom of Expression
Buckley v. Valeo
This challenge to the limits on campaign spending imposed by amendments to the Federal Elections Campaign Act represented a partial victory for free speech, as the Court struck down the Act’s restrictions on spending “relative to a candidate."
1977- Freedom of Expression
Wooley v. Maynard
A New Hampshire law that prohibited a Jehovah’s Witness from covering up the license plate slogan “Live Free or Die" was invalidated by the Court as a denial of the “right not to speak."
1978
Smith v. Collin - Freedom of Expression
A Nazi group wanted to march through a Chicago suburb, Skokie, where many Holocaust survivors lived. The ACLU’s controversial challenge to the village’s ban on the march was ultimately successful. In re Primus An ACLU cooperating attorney had been reprimanded for “improper solicitation" by the state supreme court for encouraging poor women to challenge the state’s sterilization of welfare recipients. The Court distinguished between lawyers who solicit “for pecuniary gain" and those who do so to “further political and ideological goals through associational activity."
In re Primus - Freedom of Association
Freedom of association. An ACLU cooperating attorney had been reprimanded for "improper solicitation" by the state supreme court for encouraging poor women to challenge the state's sterilization of welfare recipients. The Court distinguished between lawyers who solicit "for pecuniary gain" and those who do so to "further political and ideological goals through associational activity."
1980 - Freedom of Expression
Prune Yard Shopping Center v. Robins
Shopping mall owners appealed a California state court ruling that a shopping center allow distribution of political pamphlets on its premises. The Court rejected the owners’ property rights claim, and ruled that a mall was comparable to streets and sidewalks.
1982 - Freedom of Expression
Board of Education, Island Trees School District v. Pico
Students successfully sued their school board on First Amendment grounds for removing certain “objectionable books" from the school library. While acknowledging a school’s right to remove material that was “pervasively vulgar" or “educationally unsuitable," the Court held that in this case, the students’ First Amendment “right to know" had been violated.
1983 - Equality Under the Law
Bob Jones University v. United States
Two fundamentalist Christian colleges that practiced racial discrimination lost their tax exempt status. The IRS can set rules enforcing a “settled public policy" against racial discrimination in education.
1985 - Separation of Church
Wallace v. Jaffree
Alabama’s “moment of silence" law, which required public school children to take a moment “for meditation or voluntary prayer," violated the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause.
1986 - Separation of Church
Edward v. Aguillard
In a case reminiscent of the 1925 Scopes “monkey" trial, the Court struck down a Louisiana law that required public school science teachers to give “equal time" to so-called creation science if they taught students about the theory of evolution.
1989 - Freedom of Expression
Texas v. Johnson
In invalidating the Texas flag desecration statute, the Court provoked President Bush to propose a federal ban on flag burning or mutilation. Congress swiftly obliged, but the Court struck down that law a year later in United States v. Eichman – in which the ACLU also filed a brief.
1990 - Right to Privacy
Cruzan v. Director of the Missouri Department of Health
In the Court’s first right-to-die case, the ACLU represented the family of a woman who had been in a persistent vegetative state for more than seven years. Although the Court did not go as far as the ACLU urged, it did recognize living wills as clear and convincing evidence of a patient’s wishes.
1992
R.A.V. v. Wisconsin - Freedom of Expression
A unanimous Court struck down as overly broad a local law banning the display, on public or private property, of any symbol “that arouses anger, alarm or resentment in others on the basis of race, color, creed, religion or gender."
Planned Parenthood v. Casey - Right to Privacy
Although the Court upheld parts of Pennsylvania’s restrictive abortion law, it also reaffirmed the “central holding" of Roe v. Wade that abortions performed prior to viability cannot be prohibited by the state.
Lee v. Weisman - Separation of Church
The inclusion of a prayer at the beginning of a public high school graduation ceremony violated the Establishment Clause.
Hudson v. McMillian - Right to Fair Procedure
The beating of a shackled and handcuffed Louisiana prisoner was deemed a violation of the Eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment. “Unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain" was recognized as an appropriate standard in the prison context.
1993
J.E.B. v. T.B. - Equality Under the Law
A prosecutor could not use peremptory challenges to disqualify potential jurors based solely on their gender.
Wisconsin v. Mitchell - Right to Fair Procedure
Wisconsin’s “hate crime" statute, providing for additional criminal penalties if a jury found that a defendant “intentionally selected" a victim based on “race, religion, color, disability, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry," did not violate the First Amendment because the statute punished acts, not thoughts or speech.
1994
Ladue v. Gilleo - Freedom of Speech
A Missouri town’s ordinance that barred a homeowner from posting a sign in her bedroom window that said, “Say No to War in the Gulf – Call Congress Now!" was deemed to violate the First Amendment.
1995
Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. Hialeah - Free Excercise of Religion
A city’s ban on the ritual slaughter of animals as practiced by the Santeria religion was overturned as a violation of religious liberty since the city did permit such secular activities as hunting and fishing.
Capitol Square Review Board v. Pinett - Free Excercise of Religion
Upheld the right of the KKK to put up a cross in an area in front of the Ohio State Capitol building that was a traditional public forum used by many other groups, rejecting Ohio’s argument that allowing the display violated the separation of church and state.
McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission - Free Excercise of Religion
A state prohibition against the anonymous distribution of political campaign literature violated the right to anonymous free speech.
Hurley v. Irish American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston- Equal Under the Law
Upheld the right of private groups to exclude participants from their parades who do not share the values and message the parade sponsors wish to communicate.
Lebron v. Amtrak - Freedom of Expression
An artist argued successfully that Amtrak had been wrong to reject his billboard display because of its political message. The Court extended the First Amendment to corporations created by, and under the control of, the government.
1996
Romer v. Evans - Equality Under the Law
In this first gay rights victory, the Court invalidated a state constitutional amendment, passed by public referendum in Colorado, that prohibited the state and its municipalities from enacting gay rights laws.
Board of Commissioners v. Umbehr - Freedom of Expression
Government contractors cannot be subjected to reprisals, such as the loss of a contract, for expressing their political views.
1997
Reno v. ACLU - Freedom of Expression
The Court struck down Congress’ Communications Decency Act, which was an attempt to censor the Internet by banning “indecent" speech, ruling that “the interest in encouraging freedom of expression in a democratic society outweighs any theoretical but unproven benefit of censorship."
Chandler v. Miller - Right to Privacy
Struck down a Georgia law requiring candidates for political office to take a urine drug test on the grounds that it violated the candidates’ Fourth Amendment right to privacy.
1998 - Equality Under the Law
Bragdon v. Abbott
The anti-discrimination provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act was interpreted to apply to persons in the early stages of HIV infection, even if they did not have any overt symptoms of AIDS.
Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services - Freedom from Harrassment in the workplace
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits sexual discrimination and harassment in the workplace, applies to same-sex as well as opposite sex harassment.
1999
Chicago v. Morales - Right to Fair Procedures
Struck down Chicago’s anti-gang loitering law which disproportionately targeted African American and Latino youth who were not engaged in criminal activity, and resulted in the arrest of 45,000 innocent people.
Saenz v. Roe - Equality Under the Law
Invalidated California’s 12-month residency requirement for welfare applicants new to the state as a violation of the constitutional right to travel, and reaffirmed the principle that citizens select states; states do not select citizens.
2000
Stenberg v. Carhart - Right to Privacy
A ban on so-called "partial-birth" abortions was struck down as unconstitutional because it did not adequately protect women's health and because its broad wording threatened to outlaw many common methods of abortion.
Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe - Separation of Church & State
The Court ruled that a school district policy permitting its student body to vote at the beginning of each school year whether to have prayers before football games violated the Establishment Clause.
2001
Atkins v. Virginia - Right to Fair Procedure
Reversing its 1989 decision, the Court ruled that execution of the mentally retarded is unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment.
INS v. St. Cyr - Checks & Balances
The Court ruled that immigrants are entitled to challenge their deportation orders through habeas corpus proceedings, rejecting the Attorney General's claim that Congress had stripped the courts of jurisdiction and reversing retroactive application of the deportation statute.
2002 - Equality Under the Law
Grutter v. Bollinger/Gratz v. Bollinger
Providing a strong endorsement of affirmative action in higher education, the Court held that public universities have a compelling interest in creating a diverse student body and that race may be treated as a "plus" factor in the admissions process.
Lawrence v. Texas - Right to Privacy
The Court struck down a Texas sodomy statute that criminalized private acts of sexual intimacy between same-sex couples, expanding the privacy rights of all Americans and promoting the right of lesbians and gay men to equal treatment under the law.
I think im done visiting
I think im done visiting adbusters due to this.
This is just ridiculous. i
This is just ridiculous. i can't beleive adbusters would support anything to do with this and not the fact that its a different idea than capitalism but trying to say that the "cultural revolution "was a good thing
I can't believe what I'm
I can't believe what I'm reading.
Life was so depressingly cheap under Maoism.
His policies during the cultural revolution and the effects of his numerous political purges from 1949 to 1975 are widely believed to have caused the deaths of between 50 to 70 million people.
This is a highly pernicious article Adbusters.
The writer makes no comment
by Douglas Groothuis on March 14 2010, @10:21 pm
The writer makes no comment about China's relentless supression of freedom of speech and freedom of religion, particularly its imprisoning, killing, and torturing of countless Christian pastors and others after the takeover of Mao. Moreover, the Cultural Revolultion meant the death sentence for millions of Chinese unwilling to give themselves over to the Maoist totalitarian state. For the terrible details, see "The Black Book of Communism."
Are there excesses and problem with a free market society? Of course, but they pale in comparison to the communist barbarism of Mao, which allowed for no human rights against the all-powerful and idolatrous state. Even after Mao, there is nothing like a constitutional republic in China. Religion is regulated and suppressed and families have been limited to one child, even to the point of forced abortions. One could go on.
Ignoring these facts makes this article irresponsible and deceptive.
"I think im done visiting adbusters due to this."
- Anonymous
So am I. And this was my first visit. At least I didn't waste a lot of time here.