ron's Posts (246)
Sort by
To: rpangell@umich.edu
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2009 6:51:41 PM
Subject: In Loving Memory of Frank J. Kucinich, Jr.
In Loving Memory of Frank J. Kucinich, Jr.
| ||||
PO Box 110475 | Cleveland | OH | 44111 | 216-252-9000 |
HR 2977 IH
To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons.
October 2, 2001
Mr. KUCINICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Space Preservation Act of 2001'.
SEC. 2. REAFFIRMATION OF POLICY ON THE PRESERVATION OF PEACE IN SPACE.
Congress reaffirms the policy expressed in section 102(a) of the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 (42 U.S.C. 2451(a)), stating that it `is the policy of the United States that activities in space should be devoted to peaceful purposes for the benefit of all mankind.'.
SEC. 3. PERMANENT BAN ON BASING OF WEAPONS IN SPACE.
The President shall--
(1) implement a permanent ban on space-based weapons of the United States and remove from space any existing space-based weapons of the United States; and
(2) immediately order the permanent termination of research and development, testing, manufacturing, production, and deployment of all space-based weapons of the United States and their components.
SEC. 4. WORLD AGREEMENT BANNING SPACE-BASED WEAPONS.
The President shall direct the United States representatives to the United Nations and other international organizations to immediately work toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing a world agreement banning space-based weapons.
SEC. 5. REPORT.
The President shall submit to Congress not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter, a report on--
(1) the implementation of the permanent ban on space-based weapons required by section 3; and
(2) progress toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing the agreement described in section 4.
SEC. 6. NON SPACE-BASED WEAPONS ACTIVITIES.
Nothing in this Act may be construed as prohibiting the use of funds for--
(1) space exploration;
(2) space research and development;
(3) testing, manufacturing, or production that is not related to space-based weapons or systems; or
(4) civil, commercial, or defense activities (including communications, navigation, surveillance, reconnaissance, early warning, or remote sensing) that are not related to space-based weapons or systems.
SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS.
In this Act:
(1) The term `space' means all space extending upward from an altitude greater than 60 kilometers above the surface of the earth and any celestial body in such space.
(2)(A) The terms `weapon' and `weapons system' mean a device capable of any of the following:
(i) Damaging or destroying an object (whether in outer space, in the atmosphere, or on earth) by--
(I) firing one or more projectiles to collide with that object;
(II) detonating one or more explosive devices in close proximity to that object;
(III) directing a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation) against that object; or
(IV) any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means.
(ii) Inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person)--
(I) through the use of any of the means described in clause (i) or subparagraph (B);
(II) through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or
(III) by expelling chemical or biological agents in the vicinity of a person.
(B) Such terms include exotic weapons systems such as--
(i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons;
(ii) chemtrails;
(iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems;
(iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons;
(v) laser weapons systems;
(vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and
(vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.
(C) The term `exotic weapons systems' includes weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space.
Dennis Kucinich's brother died of heart and lung disease
Posted by dmiller April 09, 2008 09:30AM
Perry Kucinich
Perry Kucinich, 52, the youngest brother of Democratic U.S. Rep. Dennis Kucinich, died of heart and lung disease, according to the Cuyahoga County Coroner's Office.
Kucinich was found dead Dec. 19 at his apartment above Becker's Donuts & Bakery on East 71st Street in Cleveland.
Plain Dealer story posted Dec. 19:
Perry Kucinich, 52, the youngest brother of Democratic presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich, was found dead Wednesday morning at his apartment above Becker's Donuts & Bakery on East 71st Street in Cleveland.
His brother Larry found him face down on the kitchen floor at about 9 a.m., Powell Caesar, spokesman for the Cuyahoga County Frank Miller, said.
"Being face down doesn't indicate anything," Caesar said. "Whatever happened to him, gravity took hold, and he went down. There was no blunt force. No trauma. No sign of foul play."
The exact cause of death is pending autopsy results.
Larry Kucinich had taken his brother shopping Tuesday and then took him home but couldn't get an answer when he tried calling him Wednesday morning, Caesar said.
Dennis Kucinich, who represents the 10th U.S. congressional district in northeast Ohio, returned from Washington after learning of his brother's death.
Upon arriving in Cleveland, the congressman said that his brother was a talented artist whose style and structure was influenced by such modern artists as Paul Klee and Pablo Picasso.
"He was a genius," the congressman said. "He had extraordinary insights. Although he struggled with mental illness, with the help of friends and family he led a productive life. We are a close family. It's just devastating."
Perry Kucinich, the fifth of Frank and Virginia Kucinich's seven children, died eight days after his 52nd birthday and nearly 29 years to the day after he became world famous for robbing a bank.
On Dec. 18, 1978, while then-Mayor Dennis Kucinich was downtown withdrawing money to make a symbolic gesture in protest of Cleveland Trust's refusal to refinance $5 million in notes the city owed that bank, Perry Kucinich, then 22, was making an unauthorized withdrawal from a Central National Bank branch on the East Side of town.
The mayor withdrew nearly $9,200 from his personal savings and checking accounts at Cleveland Trust.
His brother, unarmed, wearing a red tassel cap, sunglasses and black leather jacket, handed a teller at a Christmas card with "All your $ or die" written on the back. He took along a light blue suitcase in which to carry the stolen $1,396.
Following the colorful description offered by witnesses, Cleveland police caught up with Perry Kucinich as he was walking home, reading the card and smiling.
Then Mayor Kucinich told reporters that Perry had been under psychiatric care for five years.
"I'm sure that he did not really understand what he was doing," he said.
Reports of the event were published internationally.
Two months later, Perry Kucinich was deemed incompetent to stand trail on a federal bank robbery charge.
He is survived by his brothers, Dennis, Larry, Frank and Gary; and sisters, Theresa and Beth Ann.
Print This Page 
| Send To A Friend 
| Permalink (Learn More)
Share: Reddit | Digg | del.icio.us | Google | Yahoo | What is this?
| Send To A Friend | Permalink (Learn More)Share: Reddit | Digg | del.icio.us | Google | Yahoo | What is this?
COMMENTS (6)Post a comment
Posted by CleveIrish on 04/09/08 at 11:19AM
What a moronic comment.
moneyman2007, if you die today at 2 PM, I hope that someone wildly, and without foundation, publicly speculates about the cause of your death, too.
To: rpangell@umich.edu
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2009 6:51:41 PM
Subject: In Loving Memory of Frank J. Kucinich, Jr.
In Loving Memory of Frank J. Kucinich, Jr.
| ||||
PO Box 110475 | Cleveland | OH | 44111 | 216-252-9000 |
HR 2977 IH
To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons.
October 2, 2001
Mr. KUCINICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Space Preservation Act of 2001'.
SEC. 2. REAFFIRMATION OF POLICY ON THE PRESERVATION OF PEACE IN SPACE.
Congress reaffirms the policy expressed in section 102(a) of the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 (42 U.S.C. 2451(a)), stating that it `is the policy of the United States that activities in space should be devoted to peaceful purposes for the benefit of all mankind.'.
SEC. 3. PERMANENT BAN ON BASING OF WEAPONS IN SPACE.
The President shall--
(1) implement a permanent ban on space-based weapons of the United States and remove from space any existing space-based weapons of the United States; and
(2) immediately order the permanent termination of research and development, testing, manufacturing, production, and deployment of all space-based weapons of the United States and their components.
SEC. 4. WORLD AGREEMENT BANNING SPACE-BASED WEAPONS.
The President shall direct the United States representatives to the United Nations and other international organizations to immediately work toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing a world agreement banning space-based weapons.
SEC. 5. REPORT.
The President shall submit to Congress not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter, a report on--
(1) the implementation of the permanent ban on space-based weapons required by section 3; and
(2) progress toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing the agreement described in section 4.
SEC. 6. NON SPACE-BASED WEAPONS ACTIVITIES.
Nothing in this Act may be construed as prohibiting the use of funds for--
(1) space exploration;
(2) space research and development;
(3) testing, manufacturing, or production that is not related to space-based weapons or systems; or
(4) civil, commercial, or defense activities (including communications, navigation, surveillance, reconnaissance, early warning, or remote sensing) that are not related to space-based weapons or systems.
SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS.
In this Act:
(1) The term `space' means all space extending upward from an altitude greater than 60 kilometers above the surface of the earth and any celestial body in such space.
(2)(A) The terms `weapon' and `weapons system' mean a device capable of any of the following:
(i) Damaging or destroying an object (whether in outer space, in the atmosphere, or on earth) by--
(I) firing one or more projectiles to collide with that object;
(II) detonating one or more explosive devices in close proximity to that object;
(III) directing a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation) against that object; or
(IV) any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means.
(ii) Inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person)--
(I) through the use of any of the means described in clause (i) or subparagraph (B);
(II) through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or
(III) by expelling chemical or biological agents in the vicinity of a person.
(B) Such terms include exotic weapons systems such as--
(i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons;
(ii) chemtrails;
(iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems;
(iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons;
(v) laser weapons systems;
(vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and
(vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.
(C) The term `exotic weapons systems' includes weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space.
Dennis Kucinich's brother died of heart and lung disease
Posted by dmiller April 09, 2008 09:30AM
Perry Kucinich
Perry Kucinich, 52, the youngest brother of Democratic U.S. Rep. Dennis Kucinich, died of heart and lung disease, according to the Cuyahoga County Coroner's Office.
Kucinich was found dead Dec. 19 at his apartment above Becker's Donuts & Bakery on East 71st Street in Cleveland.
Plain Dealer story posted Dec. 19:
Perry Kucinich, 52, the youngest brother of Democratic presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich, was found dead Wednesday morning at his apartment above Becker's Donuts & Bakery on East 71st Street in Cleveland.
His brother Larry found him face down on the kitchen floor at about 9 a.m., Powell Caesar, spokesman for the Cuyahoga County Frank Miller, said.
"Being face down doesn't indicate anything," Caesar said. "Whatever happened to him, gravity took hold, and he went down. There was no blunt force. No trauma. No sign of foul play."
The exact cause of death is pending autopsy results.
Larry Kucinich had taken his brother shopping Tuesday and then took him home but couldn't get an answer when he tried calling him Wednesday morning, Caesar said.
Dennis Kucinich, who represents the 10th U.S. congressional district in northeast Ohio, returned from Washington after learning of his brother's death.
Upon arriving in Cleveland, the congressman said that his brother was a talented artist whose style and structure was influenced by such modern artists as Paul Klee and Pablo Picasso.
"He was a genius," the congressman said. "He had extraordinary insights. Although he struggled with mental illness, with the help of friends and family he led a productive life. We are a close family. It's just devastating."
Perry Kucinich, the fifth of Frank and Virginia Kucinich's seven children, died eight days after his 52nd birthday and nearly 29 years to the day after he became world famous for robbing a bank.
On Dec. 18, 1978, while then-Mayor Dennis Kucinich was downtown withdrawing money to make a symbolic gesture in protest of Cleveland Trust's refusal to refinance $5 million in notes the city owed that bank, Perry Kucinich, then 22, was making an unauthorized withdrawal from a Central National Bank branch on the East Side of town.
The mayor withdrew nearly $9,200 from his personal savings and checking accounts at Cleveland Trust.
His brother, unarmed, wearing a red tassel cap, sunglasses and black leather jacket, handed a teller at a Christmas card with "All your $ or die" written on the back. He took along a light blue suitcase in which to carry the stolen $1,396.
Following the colorful description offered by witnesses, Cleveland police caught up with Perry Kucinich as he was walking home, reading the card and smiling.
Then Mayor Kucinich told reporters that Perry had been under psychiatric care for five years.
"I'm sure that he did not really understand what he was doing," he said.
Reports of the event were published internationally.
Two months later, Perry Kucinich was deemed incompetent to stand trail on a federal bank robbery charge.
He is survived by his brothers, Dennis, Larry, Frank and Gary; and sisters, Theresa and Beth Ann.
Print This Page | Send To A Friend | Permalink (Learn More)
Share: Reddit | Digg | del.icio.us | Google | Yahoo | What is this?
| Send To A Friend | Permalink (Learn More)Share: Reddit | Digg | del.icio.us | Google | Yahoo | What is this?
COMMENTS (6)Post a comment
Posted by CleveIrish on 04/09/08 at 11:19AM
What a moronic comment.
moneyman2007, if you die today at 2 PM, I hope that someone wildly, and without foundation, publicly speculates about the cause of your death, too.
"Statute of Liberty"
The struggle for freedom,Will always defeat them.A lie is a lie andtruth is a path to the open sky.I believe in youand I believe in meAt that point we have reached the top of a most grand treeThe highest point nearest to GodA church does rise.
A bell of truth is knownto both God and man.The liars have passedinto no man's land."You Shall know the truth, and the Truth shall set you free" Jesus
(c)Ron P AngellCamper Van Beethoven- "Sweethearts" 
Fires do start slow at firstFires sometimes need to be nursedI cover you with me and the fuelof our souls are the energy.blowing wind from heavens abovesupply the oxygen within our loveA tremble from within youmagnifies into a quake within meOur energy of "us" turns into a firewithin is ultimate love and desireOur senses hold within each otherIlluminated souls of forever loversRon P Angell(c)Camper Van Beethoven- "Take The Skinheads Bowling" Ceilings of stars Walls of clouds Heavens forever distant Terminate in the instantStorms do buildThunder does brewWhat I really wantIs to be there holding youLightning does strikeAnd we hold one another in the lightThe light show beginsAnd we smile into the windLook at me looking at youBehind your mirror I am nowOn the other side not far awayWe will wake rested to a new dayAtmosphere does extend andtouches the vacuum of spaceThere you will find no stormsOnly peace in Gods heavenly placeOur souls in the silver liningWe have each other to keep the bindingLet our rain fall down nowMix our drops of our shedding tearsWhen we are done cryingWe make a lake for diving(c)Ron P AngellCamper Van Beethoven-"All her favorite fruit"
Means of information war threaten democracy and mankind -Thank you Mojmir Babacek from Czech and John Allman from the UK
Deepest thanks to Mojmir Babacek and John Allman. Very wonderfully written and very very helpful.Thank you so very very much!!Ron AngellDownload entire document in this Blog post from the below link:Means of Information War Threaten Democracy and Mankind.doc----- Forwarded Message ----From: Mojmir BabacekTo: ronSent: Monday, June 22, 2009 4:08:00 PMSubject: article which could break secrecy sorrouding mind control weaponsHello,in the attachement I am e-mailing you an article whose wide dissemination could break the secrecy surrounding mind control technology. I am e-mailing the article all aroung the world, asking people for help. Could you help with the dissemination? I have managed to publish it on the Czech Internet newspaper and on several information servers here. Isn't there any place where you could place it? I believe you would really help to a good thing to happen. I have already found people who are not victims of mind control experimentation and are willing to participate in this effort.Mojmir Babacekmeans of information war threaten democracy and mankindMojmir Babacek(edited by John Allman)In the report on U.S. military policy by Project for New American Century it is stated: "It is now commonly understood that information and other new technologies … are creating a dynamic that may threaten America's ability to exercise its dominant military power. Potential rivals, such as China are anxious to exploit those transformational technologies broadly, while adversaries like Iran, Iraq and North Korea are rushing to develop ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons … the effects of information and other advanced technologies promise to revolutionize the nature of conventional armed forces" (ref. 13, pg. 4 and 11). The military concept of information technologies is, though, kept hidden from the world general public.In February 2000 the Russian daily Segodnya, in the article "Riders of Psychotronic Apocalypse" (1), informed that in 1996 Russian government's information agency FAPSI warned that the effect of "informational means of war" is comparable to "the effect of use of weapon of mass destruction" and produced a report entitled "Information Weapon as a Threat to National Security of Russia". In reaction the Russian State Duma and consequently Interparliamentary Assembly of the Union of Independent States addressed the United Nations, OBSE and European Council with a proposal for an international convention banning the development and use of informational weapons. According to the same newspaper Segodnya in March 1998, the matter was discussed with U.N. secretary general Kofi Anan, and included on the agenda of General Assembly of the U.N. Most probably the USA vetoed this proposal and in consequence the ban of informational weapons was not discussed by the General Assembly of the United Nations.In the Doctrine of Informational Security of the Russian Federation, signed by president Putin in September 2000, among the dangers threatening the informational security of Russian Federation, is listed “the threat to the constitutional rights and freedoms of people and citizens in the sphere of spiritual life… individual, group and societal consciousness” and “illegal use of special means affecting individual, group and societal consciousness.” (16). Among the major directions of the international cooperation toward the guaranteeing of the information security is listed “the ban of production, dissemination and use of ‘information weapons’.”(17).Segodnya, in the discussed article, described mostly "mysterious information-psychological" means capable not only of harming human health, but also of blocking human free will at the subconscious level, impairing human beings’ ability of “political, cultural and other self-identification" and even “causing destruction of indivisible informational and spiritual space of the Russian Federation”. According to Russian scientist A. F. Okhatrin, those means are also capable to kill people (2). Underneath the article, Segodnya published a review of weapons affecting human psyche which it obtained from the Russian Department of Defense. Together with ultrasound and microwave weapons, there are listed "psychotronic weapons" which, in addition to having the capability of "transfering information among people", are able to act on communication and electronic systems (1).In the Space Preservation Bill proposed by Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich in the U.S. House of Representatives in 2001, the following technologies enabling access to human brain, human health impairment or killing of people were named: "land-based, sea-based or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood managment or mind control of such persons or populations" (4). "Psychotronic weapon" listed in the Dennis J. Kucinich's bill is described as a weapon using "torsion fields" radiation in the book "Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia" (6) by Russian scientist Vladimir Tsygankov and Vladimir Lopatin (a politician, who worked on Committees on Security in Russian Federal Republic, State Duma of the Russian Federation and the Interparliamentary Assembly of the Union of Independent States). Among the possible sources of remote influence on human psyche those two authors list “generators of physical fields” of "known as well as unknown nature" (14). It is well known that both KGB and CIA carried out a large-scale research of psychic phenomena in the 70’s of the past century. It is not out of question that their scientists succeded in discovering the physical basis of those phenomena. The physical concept of non-local electron and photon connection can be certainly used to explain those phenomena.The ability of sound and light technologies to influence human psyche is exemplified by Psychowalkman industry. The existence of the electromagnetic mind control technology is confirmed in the Conclusion of the Committee on Security of the Russian State Duma [3] and can be deduced from scientific and military literature.Nerve impulses in the brain are carried by electrical signals triggered by changes in chemical balance. During the fifties and sixties of the past century, it was proved that human nervous system and behavior can be thoroughly controlled by electric signals imported to the brain by tiny electrodes (41). 100 stimulations of one point in the bull‘s brain made him 100 times bellow. When a man was asked to straighten his hand the bending of which was stimulated he replied “I think your electricity is stronger then my will.” By means of electrical stimulation of the brain the rhythm of breathing and heart beat [this was even stopped for several pulses] was affected as well as the function of the most of the viscera - alike the secretion of the gall bladder. The stimulation of points in the brain where feelings and emotions reside produced decisions. A passive, depressed woman tore up a piece of paper when her center of anger was stimulated: “I did not control myself. I had to get up and tear”, she commented. An aggressive woman, with the same point stimulated, got up and smashed against the wall the guitar she was playing until the moment of stimulation. The intensity of feelings could be controlled by turning the knob which controlled the intensity of the electric current. When the pleasure center was stimulated women offered marriage to therapists. Stimulation of a point in a monkey‘s brain stopped her maternal behavior toward a newborn baby. When the limbic system was stimulated the patients vigilance weakened, they lost capacity to think, often they began to undress or grope and when the stimulation stopped they did not remember it. The signals had to be delivered in specific frequencies to produce repetitive action of neurons. Spanish scientist Jose Delgado became world known when he, with the use of this technology, made a bull attack him by pressing one button on the small black box and stopped the bull few feet away from him by pressing another button.The idea that electric currents in the brain could be induced by electromagnetic energy is an obvious next step in this path of research. The information inside of the brain is processed digitally; in other words analog perceptions are “translated” and transferred by a number and frequency of nerve impulses, while the intensity of the feeling or perception usually corresponds to the intensity of electrical current. Walter J. Freeman, who had been for years measuring the brain activity in reaction to different stimuli by multitudes of microelectrodes, presented already in 1975 a hypothesis “that a novel external stimulus is broadly transmitted from the primary sensory cortex or thalamus to other parts of the cortex... transmission occurs at some characteristic frequency, and...reception occurs in ... sets tuned to that frequency” (37). In other words, when neurons cooperate in the processing of specific information they synchronize their activity and oscillate in the same frequency. In an experiment by Wolf Singer (20) the differences in brain activity in reaction to two different stimuli, presented to the tested subject at the same time, were represented by two different groups of neurons oscillating in different frequencies. In the modern scientific literature synchronization of frequencies of emitted nerve impulses in different parts of the brain as a principle of brain functioning is generally accepted (19). Electroencephalographers have no doubt that those synchronizations appear on the EEG recordings and are already able to “read” in those frequencies the single letters of a word perceived by the tested subject (21). Theoretically this means that the events in the brain can be produced “synthetically” from the outside when additional energy is pumped into the brain in specific frequencies corresponding to specific brain activities. John Marks, in his book on CIA mind control research, quotes one of the CIA research veterans recalling a colleague’s joke: “If you could find the natural radio frequency of a person‘s sphincter, you could make him run out of the room real fast” (22). Since most of the activity of human brain takes place in frequencies from 1 to 100 Hz and electromagnetic waves of this frequency are hundreds and even thousands of miles long, and, for that matter, could not target human brain, scientists started experimenting with pulsed microwaves. There exist “window” frequencies at which microwaves penetrate deep enough into the brain to produce activity of neurons.The interaction of electromagnetic radiation and chemicals in the brain was demonstrated for example by the experiment where irradiation of rats’ heads by 20 and 40 mW/cm2 microwaves pulsed at 300, 600 and 1000 Hz woke the rats up in 5 minutes from narcosis (23). Electrical signals of neurons in the brain are mediated by chemicals called neurotransmitters. At a conference on “Emerging Electromagnetic Medicine” in 1989 Capt. Paul Tyler, director of the U.S. Navy Electromagnetic Radiation Project between 1970 and 1977, quoted in his lecture the research of Dr. Merrit who measured the decrease of norepinephrine, serotonine and dopamine when a field of 80 mW/cm2 was applied (24). All those hormones act as neurotransmitters into the cortex. Dopamin influences the ability to learn and other cognitive abilities. Disruption in the biosynthesis or transmission of dopamine can lead to Parkinson’s disease. In another experiment a 500Hz signal produced release of neradrenaline in sympathetical neurons (25). Since those neurons control the muscles of internal organs and noraderenaline acts there as a neurotransmitter, an oposite signal should be able to reduce the activity of internal organs and eventually impair human health. The publication of the World Health Organization on the effects of electromagnetic radiation on living organisms from 1981 (25) gives many examples of the effects of microwave radiation on the excretion of glands and chemical composition of blood. Many of those effects could harm human health. Microwave radiation can also affect molecules of DNA and thus affect the development of organisms (25). This was proved by an experiment by Yale neurophysiologist, Jose Delgado, where the irradiation of chicken embryos by 10, 100 and 1000 Hz stopped their development including the development of hearts and veins. The experiment was replicated by the American Navy with the same results. Such attack by microwaves could have, in the long run, disastrous impact on targeted populations.A a matter of fact microwave radiation can produce many deadly effects. In the experiment by McAffee already mentioned, the microwaves pulsed at 300, 600 and 1000 Hz produced impairment in breathing (leading even to suffocation) in rats. A similar signal could also suffocate human beings. At the conference on Nonlinear Electrodynamics in Biological Systems in 1983 the experiment was presented where blood clots were formed by microwave radiation (26). This capability is also suitable for weaponisation. Similarly dangerous is the finding of Allan Frey that radio frequency radiation can weaken the blood-brain barrier that prevents poisonous chemicals from the access into the brain (30). In 1986 the American Air Force issued a book “Low Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology” (18). The chapter headed “Electromagnetic Spectrum in Low Intensity Conflict”, was written by Capt. Paul Tyler, who had been the director of the U.S. Navy Electromagnetic Radiation Project from 1970 until 1977. At the beginning of the chapter, Tyler quotes a source entitled “Final Report on Biotechnology Research Requirements for Aeronautical Systems Through the Year 2000” that had been issued by American Air Force in 1982: “Currently available data allow the projection that specially generated radiofrequency radiation (RFR) fields may pose a powerful and revolutionary antipersonnel military threats ... the passage of approximately 100 miliamperes through the myocardium can lead to cardiac standstill and death ... A rapidly scanning RFR system could provide an effective stun or kill capability over a large area. System effectiveness will be a function of wave form, field intensity, pulse width, repetition frequency, and carrier frequency.”In less draconian assault, the use of microwaves could be limited just to the influence of human behavior. In 1985 Kathleen McAuliffe visited Jose Delgado in his laboratory in Spain, where he experimented with electromagnetic stimulation of brain. She subsequently wrote an article for the magazine OMNI (27). Jose Delgado showed her how he could make an ape fall asleep, or make it overactive, or how he could calm down fighting fish using suitably modulated microwave radiation.The next series of experiments shows that human behavior can be controlled in even more intricate ways. In 1962 Allan H. Frey published in the “Journal of Applied Physiology” (28) the results of experimentation with transmission of sounds into the brain by electromagnetic radiation at a distance of up to 1000 feet. The “electromagnetic” sounds were heard by deaf as well as hearing people. In his report, Frey writes that, by then, only the visual system had been shown to respond to electromagnetic energy and he noted that, “With somewhat different transmission parameters we can induce the perception of severe buffeting of the head..” and ”Changing ... parameters again, one can induce a ‘pins-and-needles’ sensation.” Frey’s experiment was replicated several times by other scientists (28). Another, more advanced experiment that also involved the transmission of radio modulated with audible sounds into the brain, was published only inadvertently, when Don R. Justesen used, in the article on "Microwaves and Behavior" (29), the result of an experiment described to him over the telephone conversation by his colleague J. C. Sharp, who worked on a secret military project Pandora. Joseph C. Sharp at the Walter Reed Army Institute improved the method of Frey to the point that he was able to transmit into the experimental subject’s brain words which he could understand. The ability of U.S. military to produce perception of speech in humans by microwave radiation substantiates the article by Sharon Weinberger, “Mind Games”, which was published in The Washington Post in January 2007. In response to a Freedom of Information Act request filed for the article the Air Force released “records that note that the patent was based on human experimentation in October 1994 at the Air Force lab, where scientists were able to transmit phrases into the heads of human subjects” The article also states that “the research laboratory, citing classification, refused to discuss it or release other materials” (31).Robert Becker, who was twice nominated for Nobel price for his share in the discovery of the effects of pulsed fields at the healing of broken bones, wrote about the experiment by J. F. Schapitz, who stated: “In this investigation it will be shown that the spoken word of hypnotist may also be conveyed by modulated electromagnetic energy directly into the subconcscious parts of the human brain - i. e. without employing any technical devices for receiving or transcoding the messages and without the person exposed to such influence having a chance to control the information input consciously.” In one of the four experiments subjects were given a test of hundred questions, ranging from easy to technical ones. Later, not knowing they were being irradiated, they would be subjected to information beams suggesting the answers to the questions they had left blank, amnesia for some of their correct answers, and memory falsification for other correct answers. After 2 weeks they had to pass the test again (30). The results of those experiments were never published. Apparently in those experiments the messages were sent into human brain in ultrasound frequencies which the human brain perceives, but of which the subject is unaware. According to Russian newspapers, in this way, people may be programmed to perform different actions in the same way people can be programmed under hypnosis. The use of this method was questioned in the Russian press when general Lev Rokhlin was killed by his wife in his sleep at 2 a.m. after she had had a casual telephone conversation with a female friend. Did her friend use a sequence of words which were supposed to trigger the murderous action? Before his murder General Rokhlin planned for army protests against army reform and visited editor’s desks of Russian newspapers, telling them he might be soon killed in a car accident, during a drinking spree or during an argument with his wife (42).In his book “Cross Currents” Robert Becker presents the report coming from the Microwave Research Department at the Walter Reed Army Institute, where J.C. Sharp carried out his experiment with the transmission of words into the brain by radiofrequency radiation. The report deals with the effects of pulsed microwaves on the nervous system and describes the division of testing program into four parts: 1) prompt debilitating effects; 2) prompt stimulation auditory effects; 3) work interference (stoppage) effects; 4) effects on stimulus controlled behavior. The report presents this conclusion: “Microwave pulses appear to couple to the central nervous system and produce stimulation similar to electrical stimulation unrelated to heat” (32).The American Air Force, according to the Final Report on Biotechnology Research Requirements for Aeronautical Systems Through the Year 2000, divided the research of radiofrequency weapons into three areas: 1) Pulsed RFR Effects - projected research since 1980 until 1995; 2) “Mechanisms of RFR with Living Systems” referred to as “continuation of ongoing research” beginning in 1980 and forecast to conclude around 1997;3) “RFR forced disruptive phenomena” - starting around 1986 with the projectedcontinuation until 2010. In the second volume of this report, it was stated that the work on the project was progressing according to the schedule or in advance. The last-mentioned area of research is redefined in the second volume: “While initial attention should be toward degradation of human performance through thermal loading and electromagnetic field effects, subsequent work should address the possibilities of directing and interrogating mental functioning, using externally applied fields...” (33).In the Soviet Russia the ongoing research in this area was completely hidden from the public, but change of political system and actual use of this equipment during the putsch against Gorbachov brought this subject to newspapers headlines. According to Russian daily newspapers, during the failed coup d'etat against Gorbachov, General Kobets warned the defenders of the Russian White House that mind control technology could be used against them. After the putsch, respected Russian scientist Victor Sedlecki published a statement in the Russian daily Komsomolskaya Pravda that psychotronic biogenerators were mass produced in the Soviet Union and were used during the failed coup d'etat [7], but failed to succeed due to the inexperience of the personel who operated them. In the following spree of articles on the subject of mind control, the experiment was published where manipulation of masses of people by microwave radiation was performed. Already in 1974, after successful testing on a military unit in Novosibirsk, the installation Radioson (Radiosleep) was registered with the Government Committee on the Matters of Inventions and Discoveries of the USSR, described as a method of induction of sleep by means of radio waves. Apparently, in 1974, the entire military unit was put to sleep (5).In the book “Low Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology” (18), Captain Tyler also wrote: “Because of the many parameters involved and the apparent specificity of each parameter, one can tailor a specific response. The ability to have this kind of flexibility provides an enormous range of options to the user. It opens the door for providing an appropriate response in warfare, be it conventional or unconventional” (18). If you object that the range of frequencies in which the human nervous system works is too narrow to provide for such a wide choice of reactions, Capt. Tyler writes: “There are unconfirmed reports that change of 0.01 Hz can make a difference.” Since many activities of human brain are represented by different sequences of frequencies, this provides for further large choices.At the end of 1994 the first tests of the most powerful radar system in the world were carried out in Alaska. This year its power should reach 10 billion watts and later 100 billion watts. The main features of the system include its ability to heat the ionosphere and in this way change the altitude of the ionosphere. By this kind of manipulation of the ionosphere, it is possible to bounce the electromagnetic waves back from the ionosphere to whichever region of the planet one wishes to target. According to the official information by the U.S. government the system HAARP is designed for scientific research. However, there are too many facts suggesting that the major reason for its construction are military purposes. The main patent of Bernard J. Eastlund (number 4,686,605) proposes the use of the system for destruction of navigation systems of airplanes and missiles wherever in the atmosphere they might be, and for interference with all communication systems anywhere on the planet, and the global weather control. Other patents connected with the system propose the use of the system for induction of detonations in the extent of nuclear explosions and other military uses (33).Evidently, the warning of Russian intelligence agency FAPSI to the Russian government and the article in the Russian daily “Segodnya” were amongst the recations to the installation of the U.S. system HAARP. The HAARP system can pulse microwave radiation begining from one thousandth of one Hertz and, in this case, there is hardly and doubt that it can change pulses of microwave radiation by 1 thousandth of Hertz, as well in frequencies from 1 to 100 Hertz which are crucial for the functioning of human nervous system. In June 1995, Michael Persinger, who apparently worked on the American Navy's project of non-lethal electromagnetic weapons “Sleeping Beauty”, published, in a scientific magazine Perception and Motor Skills the article where he states: “the technical capability to influence directly the major portion of the approximately six billion brains of the human species without mediation through classical sensory modalities by generating neural information within a physical medium within which all members of the species are immersed… is now marginally feasible” (34).John B. Alexander, who later became the Director of Non-lethal Programs in Los Alamos National Laboratory, wrote in his article in the Military Review in the year 1980: “whoever makes the first major breakthrough in this field will have a quantum lead over his opponent, an advantage similar to sole possession of nuclear weapons” (35). Samuel Koslov, a leading personality of the Pandora project that was dedicated to research of effects of microwave radiation on humans, and a researcher at the John Hopkins University, in his closing speech at the conference on Nonlinear Electrodynamics in Biological Systems in 1984, said that the conference had proven that the external electric fields can “become a key to the cellular control console. The implications, social, economic, and even military are enormous.” Koslov went on: “If much of what we have heard is indeed correct, it may be not less significant to the nation than the prospects that faced the physics community in 1939 when the long-time predicted fissionability of the nucleus was actually demonstrated. You may recall the famous letter of Albert Einstein to President Roosvelt. When we’re in a position to do so in terms of our proofs, I would propose that an analogous letter is required” (26).It is this perspective, of the revolutionary nature of these scientific developments, that gives us the title, “Revolution in Military Affairs and Conflict Short of War”, of a book published by the Strategic Studies Institute at the U.S. Army War College in 1994 (36). Since the national security information is in question, the book cannot tell the readers what technology exactly is making this revolution feasible. From the beginning the authors were aware that the use of this technology may run counter to basic moral and political values of the American society, and in consequence the revolution in military affairs would require a moral and political revolution to come first: ”In the pre-RMA days, psychological operations and psychological warfare were primitive. As they advanced into the electronic and bioelectronic era, it was necessary to rethink our ethical prohibitions on manipulating the minds of enemies (and potential enemies) both international and domestic... Through persistent efforts and very sophisticated domestic ”consciousness raising”, old-fashioned notions of personal privacy and national sovereignty changed.” Since it is difficult for them to imagine that the American society would accept the ethical and political revolution that would deprive the citizen of his privacy, they develop a scenario of events which would lead the American political leaders to back this revolution. The scenario is placed into the year 2000, and is based on the situation of growing terrorism, drug trafficking and criminality. In the document Rebuilding Americas Defenses, backed by the past U.S. government, we read: “To preserve American military preeminence in the coming decades, the Department of Defense must … seek to exploit the emerging revolution in military affairs … Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor” (ref. 13, pg. 51). Was it by accident that in 2001 a masive terrorist attack ocurred in the USA facilitated by questionable work of U.S. intelligence services and followed by anthrax attacks where the only indicted scientist, Bruce Ivins, did not have the technical means and scientific knowledge to turn the anthrax spores into a deadly aerosol which was used and that those two attacks were followed by an assault on privacy of U.S. Citizens and international law?The scenario goes on: “The president was thus amenable to the use of the sort of psychotechnology which formed the core of the RMA (revolution in military affairs) in conflict short of war ... As technology changed the way force was applied, things such as personal courage, face-to-face leadership, and the ‘warfighter’ mentality became irrelevant.” So the psychotechnology, which formed the core of the RMA, provided new methods for influencing the psyche of the adversary, in place of the classical strategy to make him fear his death. The book goes on: “Potential or possible supporters of the insurgency around the world were identified using the comprehensive Interagency Integrated Database. These were categorized as ‘potential’ or ‘active’, with sophisticated personality simulations used to develop, tailor and focus psychological campaigns for each. There is also potential for defensive psychotechnology such as ‘strategic personality simulations’ to aid national security decision makers.” (See Norman D. Livergood and Stephen D. Williams, “Strategic Personality Simulation: A New Strategic Concept”, unpublished draft paper, Carlisle Barracks, PAK: U.S. Army War College, 1994). In other words if there was, for example, a new Jesus Christ, U.S. agencies would simply engineer his personality to make sure he would not introduce any cultural changes. Once the strategy of computerized personality simulation is applied, the unfolding of human history will be totally controlled by elites having exclusive access to those technologies. The conclusion of the authors was: “Whether we opt for revolution or evolution, change will occur.”The concept of the “strategic personality stimulation” is probably tested on some of the people in the USA who claim to be mind control experiments victims, whose number, rapidly growing after 9/11 attacks, inspired the article in Washington Post, entitled “Mind Games” (31) in 2007. Cheryl Welsh, the director of the American organization Mind Justice (38) claims that she has received over 2500 complaints from U.S. citizens, that they fell victims to those experiments. Though some of those people may be mentally ill, many of them defend themselves in a rational way that suggests that they are mentally sound. A similar situation obtains in Russia. Russian politician Vladimir Lopatin admitted nonconcensual human-subject experiments had been conducted in Russia, when he wrote in the quoted book: “Compensation of damages and losses connected with social rehabilitation of persons suffering from destructive informational influence must be realized in legal trial…” (14). Growing numbers of complaints are coming as well from China and Japan (over 200).The European Parliament reacted to the installation of HAARP system by calling for “an international convention introducing a global ban on all developments and deployments of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings” (15, Paragraph 27). The body of the European Parliament STOA (Scientific and Technolgical Options Assessment) in the document “Crowd Control Technologies” (40) informed this resolution, originally proposed drafting of Paragraph 27 to say that the parliament called for “an international convention for a global ban on all research and development … which seeks to apply knowledge of the chemical, electrical, sound vibration or other functioning of the human brain to the development of weapons which might enable the manipulation of human beings, including a ban of any actual or possible deployment of such systems”. US Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich, the author of a Bill introduced into the US Congress in October 2001 proposing a ban on the deployment of “mind control” weapons, was quoted to assert that those weapons actually exist and “those people who control them are deadly serious and intend to use them, if we don't stop the weaponisation of space” (10).Electromagnetic technology enabling remote control of the functioning of human organism is subjected to National Security Information law in the USA (8) and all technologies enabling access to human brain are subject to the same law in the Russian Federation (9). Under such conditions, the mass media cannot fully disclose the existence and capacities of those technologies and world public cannot be engaged in favour of a ban on the use of such capabilities. The ownership of those capabilities gives opportunity to governments to use them against individuals (and eventually against masses), without giving them any access to any legal remedy. The concept of the world respecting freedom and human rights is fundamentally corrupted in this way. In November 2000 the Committee on Security of the Russian State Duma stated that capabilities enabling remote control of human nervous system or the remote infliction of health impairment are available to many modern governments (3). This was confirmed by the article from the U.S. army weekly Defense News stating that mind control technologies were used by the Israelis against the Palestinians (12).Evidently the secret arms race among the world governments may continue until the information war actually breaks out. V. Lopatin, in the book “Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia”, stated that psychotronic war is, as a matter of fact, “already taking place without declaration of war”. In this way the human world may sink into some kind of virtual reality where the independence of human thinking, feeling and decision making will be destroyed as a part of an “information war” or, in the worst case, into the reality where large masses of people will be killed, and unlike the aftermath of the deployment of nuclear weapons, the planet will still remain inhabitable for the survivors.With emerging energetic and climate crises and a presently-growing global economic crisis, either the next world war could erupt, or the means of remote manipulation of human brains and organisms could be applied to control dissatisfied citizens. Our elected democratic representatives are responsible for foreseeing the emerging crises and preventing them from happening by appropriate measures. However, they do not have mandate from citizens to allow those crises to happen, in order to create opportunities for them to experiment with attempts to solve the problems by use of technologies that allow them to manipulate their citizens’ minds. If this technology is once used against citizens it is questionable whether true democracy will ever be restored. The countries with the most advanced military technologies include the USA, which has never proposed any international initiative aimed at securing the ban of technologies enabling the remote control of human beings. According to the study “Crowd Control Technologies” published by the European Parliament’s STOA office, the USA are the major promoter of the use of those arms. (In fact, it was principally the efforts of the USA government to persuade this outcome that ensured the inclusion in NATO military doctrine of non-lethal technology.) The STOA states: “In October 1999 NATO announced a new policy on non-lethal weapons and their place in allied arsenals”; and “In 1996 non-lethal tools identified by the U.S. Army included… directed energy systems” and “radio frequency weapons” (40).According to the Russian government intelligence agency FAPSI, in the last 15 years, the U.S. expenses on the development and acquisition of the means of informational war grew four times and at the present time they occupy the first place among all military programs (17),(3). Though there are concepts of informational warfare other than the remote control of human beings, the unwillingnes of the USA to engage in the negotiations aimed at the ban of the manipulation of human brains suggests an intention to use those means in internal as well as in international affairs. If the USA achieve essential military preeminence in this area and if no global ban of the use of those technologies against civilians is negotiated, the USA may become a world totalitarian superpower of the new type.So far the only government who made a small step toward the ban of those technologies is the Russian Federation where the addendum to the article 6 of the Russian Federation law “On Weapons” was approved on July 26, 2001. It states: “within the territory of the Russian Federation is prohibited the circulation of weapons and other objects … the effects of the operation of which are based on the use of electromagnetic, light, thermal, infra-sonic or ultra-sonic radiations…”. Besides omitting the “psychotronic energy” The law does not provide any means for Russian citizens to defend themselves against the use of those weapons. Nor is there any compulsion upon the police or public health organizations to set up teams capable of detecting radiation that was enabling remote manipulation of human body and nervous system, or the source of such radiation. Nor does this law prohibit Russian government agencies from the use of such technology against their own citizens. In the USA alone, some of the federal states have enacted in their laws on firearms, new standards on electric and electromagnetic weapons (Michigan in 2003, Massachusetts in 2004, Maine in 2005). Sanctions go from 15 years in jail to life imprisonment, identically with weapons of mass destruction. As in Russia, those laws do not provide for the defense of citizens against the use of those weapons by government agencies.On February 25, 2009 Deputy Chief of General Staff of Russian Army, Anatoli Nogovicyn, stated that within 2 or 3 years a full fledged war in informational sphere, including “information-psychlogical influence on population and military units” may break out (39). So far politicians (especially in the USA) have not shown responsible intention to take action to stop this new arms race, which threatens to place human beings in a position subsidiary to machines and to destroy democracy. Humanitarian organizations apparently do not dare to challenge this National Security Information (on several occasions Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have refused to engage with this issue). Under such circumstances, it is left to citizens themselves to organize defense of their freedoms and elementary human rights, before those technologies are used, either at war or to suppress their dissatisfaction with governments who failed to prevent the emerging crises. They should coordinate their efforts internationally if they want to succeed.| 169 | 1:06 pm PDT, Apr 23 | Ms. | Diana Williams | United States | ||||
| 168 | 4:12 am PDT, Apr 2 | Allan Himour | Canada | |||||
| 167 | 3:37 pm PDT, Mar 20 | Mr. | John Allman | United Kingdom | ||||
| 166 | 12:01 pm PDT, Mar 20 | Mr. | serge labrèze | France | ||||
| 165 | 6:35 pm PDT, Mar 17 | Torrance Turner | United States | |||||
| 164 | 1:49 pm PDT, Mar 17 | Teresa Taylor | United States | |||||
| 163 | 11:49 pm PDT, Mar 16 | Mr. | Paolo Dorigo | Italy | ||||
| 162 | 8:43 pm PDT, Mar 16 | Mr. | john finch | Australia | ||||
| 161 | 7:51 pm PDT, Mar 16 | Ryan Shields | United States | |||||
| 160 | 3:02 pm PDT, Mar 16 | Mr. | Marlon Crump | United States | ||||
| 159 | 7:53 am PDT, Mar 16 | Mr. | Gerry Duffett | Canada | ||||
| 158 | 5:56 am PDT, Mar 16 | Mr. | Anonymous | United Kingdom | ||||
| 157 | 3:03 am PDT, Mar 16 | Mr. | jarkko makkonen | Finland | ||||
| 156 | 4:49 pm PDT, Mar 15 | Mr. | Donald Foster | United States | ||||
| 155 | 4:48 pm PDT, Mar 15 | Mr. | Anonymous | United States | ||||
| 154 | 9:17 am PDT, Mar 15 | Anonymous | Switzerland | |||||
| 153 | 8:03 am PDT, Mar 15 | Anonymous | United States | |||||
| 152 | 1:18 am PDT, Mar 15 | Mr. | marius miliukas | Lithuania | ||||
| 151 | 10:29 pm PDT, Mar 14 | Mr. | Marc Burnell | United States | ||||
| 150 | 4:03 pm PDT, Mar 14 | Mr. | Javier Felipe Arias | Colombia | ||||
| 149 | 3:24 pm PDT, Mar 14 | Mrs. | Anonymous | United States | ||||
| 148 | 2:14 pm PDT, Mar 14 | Mr. | Ron Angell | United States | ||||
| 147 | 12:47 pm PST, Feb 6 | Anonymous | United States | |||||
| 146 | 12:35 pm PST, Jan 27 | Ms. | Jennifer Lichy | United States | ||||
| 145 | 12:01 pm PST, Jan 26 | denise s.pompl | United States | |||||
| 144 | 5:57 am PST, Jan 26 | Anonymous | United States | |||||
| 143 | 9:40 am PST, Jan 25 | Ms. | A.Karoline Fuchs | Austria | ||||
| 142 | 9:02 am PST, Jan 24 | kevin fowler | United States | |||||
| 141 | 7:26 am PST, Jan 24 | James Graf | United States | |||||
| 140 | 7:19 am PST, Jan 24 | Mr. | Anonymous | United States | ||||
| 139 | 12:47 am PST, Jan 24 | Mr. | James M. Vierling Jr. | United States | ||||
| 138 | 9:35 pm PST, Jan 23 | Mr. | Carl Sperr | United States | ||||
| 137 | 8:17 pm PST, Jan 23 | Mr. | Terry Parker Jr. | Canada | ||||
| 136 | 2:24 pm PST, Jan 23 | Ms. | Anti Nazi | Zambia | ||||
| 135 | 1:51 pm PST, Jan 23 | Mr. | Peter Rosenholm | United States | ||||
| 134 | 1:36 pm PST, Jan 23 | Mr. | Anonymous | United States | ||||
| 133 | 8:43 am PST, Jan 23 | Deborah Lamb | United States | |||||
| 132 | 8:42 am PST, Jan 23 | John Mecca | United States | |||||
| 131 | 5:48 am PST, Jan 23 | Ms. | Galina Kurdina | Canada | ||||
| 130 | 9:39 pm PST, Jan 22 | Ms. | Valerie Gilliam | United States | ||||
| 129 | 8:36 pm PST, Jan 22 | Mr. | ERIC GRIFFIN | United States | ||||
| 128 | 4:43 am PDT, Sep 15 | Sarah Bourke | Australia | |||||
| 127 | 3:06 pm PDT, Sep 13 | Don j. Brown | United States | |||||
| 126 | 3:02 am PDT, Aug 10 | adam sanchez | United States | |||||
| 125 | 7:36 pm PDT, May 19 | Mrs. | Anonymous | United States | ||||
| 124 | 2:42 am PDT, Apr 28 | Mrs. | Anonymous | Poland | ||||
| 123 | 11:34 am PDT, Apr 6 | Ms. | Laurel Watson | United States | ||||
| 122 | 1:46 pm PDT, Mar 13 | Dr. | Etienne Parent | Canada | ||||
| 121 | 4:25 pm PST, Feb 28 | Homer Goodall, Jr | United States | |||||
| 120 | 1:03 pm PST, Feb 6 | Anton Oscar Iorga | Canada | |||||
| 119 | 10:04 am PST, Jan 31 | Barbara Scis | United States | |||||
| 118 | 7:23 am PST, Jan 30 | Ms. | Victoria Mary Stong / myMOMletDR'sdothistome! | United States | ||||
| 117 | 2:08 pm PST, Jan 23 | Ms. | Anonymous | Russian Federation | ||||
| 116 | 6:31 pm PST, Jan 7 | Brent K Krieger (victim) | United States | |||||
| 115 | 1:00 pm PDT, Sep 26 | Mr. | James F. Marino | United States | ||||
| 114 | 9:46 am PDT, Sep 12 | Ms. | Jody M. Smith | United States | ||||
| 113 | 1:19 pm PDT, Jul 8 | Mr. | Bennie Vorster | South Africa | ||||
| 112 | 7:29 am PDT, Jul 2 | Ms. | Juliet Perrin | United States | ||||
| 111 | 5:18 am PDT, May 29 | Ms. | Anonymous | United States | ||||
| 110 | 11:18 am PDT, May 13 | Mr. | Gerry Duffett | Canada | ||||
| 109 | 9:40 pm PDT, May 10 | Ms. | Anonymous | Australia | ||||
| 108 | 7:27 pm PDT, May 7 | Dr. | Robert Brown | United States | ||||
| 107 | 4:12 pm PDT, Apr 8 | Anonymous | United States | |||||
| 106 | 12:30 am PDT, Apr 8 | Dr. | M Neves | Portugal | ||||
| 105 | 9:39 am PDT, Apr 4 | GREG FAMINE | United States | |||||
| 104 | 9:10 am PDT, Mar 29 | Zorina Huestis | United States | |||||
| 103 | 1:03 pm PDT, Mar 22 | SEAN LEE | United States | |||||
| 102 | 4:40 am PDT, Mar 11 | Ms. | Linda Michelle Lalla | United States | ||||
| 101 | 6:35 am PST, Mar 8 | Mr. | Jay Mick | Number | Date | Prefix | Name | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 10:26 am PST, Feb 26 | Mr. | Roman Soiko | United States | ||||
| 99 | 1:03 am PST, Feb 25 | john finch | Australia | |||||
| 98 | 2:10 pm PST, Feb 11 | Anonymous | United States | |||||
| 97 | 9:29 pm PST, Feb 2 | Raj Dubey | Singapore | |||||
| 96 | 9:21 am PST, Jan 24 | Dr. | Anonymous | United States | ||||
| 95 | 3:11 pm PST, Jan 4 | Mr. | israel streetman | United States | ||||
| 94 | 3:10 pm PST, Jan 1 | Danille Baptista | United States | |||||
| 93 | 4:23 pm PST, Dec 19 | Anonymous | Argentina | |||||
| 92 | 8:32 am PST, Dec 13 | Ms. | Anonymous | United States | ||||
| 91 | 7:25 pm PST, Nov 26 | Anonymous | United States | |||||
| 90 | 5:39 pm PDT, Oct 25 | Mr. | Douglas A. Huntley II | United States | ||||
| 88 | 3:07 am PDT, Aug 16 | Tamara Josey | United States | |||||
| 87 | 12:06 am PDT, Jul 29 | KARLA GLOOR | United States | |||||
| 86 | 8:59 am PDT, Jun 2 | fox mulder | United States | |||||
| 85 | 8:51 am PDT, Jun 2 | Dana Scully | United States | |||||
| 84 | 5:46 am PDT, May 31 | WYF ? | Tanzania, United Republic Of | |||||
| 83 | 3:42 am PDT, May 29 | Patrick harrington | United States | |||||
| 82 | 3:41 pm PDT, May 28 | David Duke | United States | |||||
| 81 | 11:38 am PDT, May 28 | Mr. | Eward J Zander, Ceo of Motorola | United States | ||||
| 80 | 12:25 am PDT, May 28 | take some Haldol | China | |||||
| 79 | 3:15 am PDT, May 27 | Steve Klein | Canada | |||||
| 78 | 10:40 pm PDT, May 16 | Mr. | special agent michael bray | United States | ||||
| 77 | 7:33 am PDT, May 12 | Toni Sokoloski | United States | |||||
| 76 | 7:54 am PDT, May 7 | stephanie lessard | United States | |||||
| 75 | 10:25 am PDT, May 4 | Mr. | shane pimental | United States | ||||
| 74 | 4:12 am PDT, Apr 13 | Thomas Pirovano | Switzerland | |||||
| 73 | 8:58 pm PDT, Apr 10 | Robert F. Schuler | United States | |||||
| 72 | 12:54 am PST, Mar 20 | Mr. | this is bullshit | Zambia | ||||
| 71 | 3:53 pm PST, Mar 12 | Mr. | Adam Danischewski | United States | ||||
| 70 | 4:15 am PST, Feb 16 | Mr. | Karlheinz Croissant | Germany | ||||
| 69 | 2:31 pm PST, Feb 10 | Wendy Horn | United States | |||||
| 68 | 4:40 am PST, Feb 10 | Anonymous | Albania | |||||
| 67 | 4:05 am PST, Feb 10 | Mr. | John Davenport | Italy | ||||
| 66 | 6:53 pm PST, Jan 27 | Ms. | Danuta Zielinska | United States | ||||
| 65 | 11:51 am PST, Dec 29 | Ms. | Rebecca R. Fenton | United States | ||||
| 64 | 12:46 am PST, Dec 10 | Kenneth Morris Wilbourne,Jr. | United States | |||||
| 63 | 8:09 pm PST, Nov 21 | Dean Ray | Canada | |||||
| 62 | 8:50 pm PST, Nov 16 | Paul R.Nash | Australia | |||||
| 61 | 10:26 am PDT, Oct 16 | J. Patel | United States | |||||
| 60 | 7:07 am PDT, Oct 15 | patricia przybysz | United States |
HUMAN PERFORMANCE-The Dept of Defense Jason Program, the NON profit Mitre corp, Lehman Brothers mind control
VIP VIP VIP
The Mitre Corp HUMAN PERFORMANCEEvidence of TortureEvidence of TorturePlease look at the Document (Human Performance) Human.pdf That is the Mitre Corporation. The Chairman of the Board of the Mitre corp as well as formerly being in the US DoD Defense dept as well as being on the board of directors of Lehman Brothers is Dr. James R. Schlesingerhttp://www.mitre.org/about/trustees.htmlChairmanBoard Member Since 1985Dr. James R. Schlesinger currently divides his time between MITRE, where he serves as chairman of the board, and the investment banking firm of Barclays Capital, where he serves as senior advisor. He is also a consultant to the Departments of Defense and State, and a member of the Defense Policy Board and the International Security Advisory Board.Dr. Schlesinger is a fellow of the National Academy of Public Administration and a member of the American Academy of Diplomacy. He is a director for Evergreen Energy and Sandia National Corporation. He is also a counselor and trustee of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a trustee of the Atlantic Council, the Nixon Center, the National Cryptologic Museum Foundation, the Center for Global Energy Studies, and the Henry M. Jackson Foundation.Google The Dept of Defense Jason Program. The 60 or so members have formed the Mitre Corporation based out of McLean VA as well as a Fusion Center and mind control center outside of Boston. http://www.mitre.orgEvidence of TortureEvidence of TortureSubject: AE911Truth Action Alert: Urgent Message from Richard Gage, AIA
To: rpangell@umich.edu
Date: Sunday, May 24, 2009, 9:01 AM
 | ||
| Your source for hot news/information/events • May 15, 2009 | ||
Urgent Message from Richard Gage, AIA | ||
|
- Wednesday 20 May 2009
"Statute of Liberty"The struggle for freedom,Will always defeat them.A lie is a lie andtruth is a path to the open sky.I believe in youand I believe in meAt that point we have reached the top of a most grand treeThe highest point nearest to GodA church does rise.A church where angels singand do ringA bell of truth is knownto both God and man.The liars have passedinto no man's land."You Shall know the truth, and the Truth shall set you free" JesusYou can go on,give it another try.The power of your youth is strong,and as big as the sky.Search all over the valley,Climb the mountains and you’ll see...Believing in yourself sets you free!(c)Ron AngellChemtrails are torture, murder, mind control by Cheney, Bush, Wolfowitz, Rove, Rumsfield,Denis Hastert, William J Rigby, Daniel J Rigbyhttp://www.carnicom.com
"What you are will show in what you do" Thomas Alva Edison-Space Preservation Treaty (Official Text as of August 14, 2008)
Fw: U.S. Preparing For War With Russia-Lt. Gen. Keith Alexander, also the Pentagon’s leading cyber warfare commander, said the U.S. is determined to lead the global effort to use computer technology to deter or defeat enemies….” [6]http://www.peaceinspace.orgFw: U.S. Preparing For War With Russia-Lt. Gen. Keith Alexander, also the Pentagon’s leading cyber warfare commander, said the U.S. is determined to lead the global effort to use computer technology to deter or defeat enemies….” [6]Space Preservation Treaty (Official Text as of August 14, 2008)
Oppenheimer Documentary... VIP
Tom Bearden: Mind Control and EM Wave Polarization Transductions - Part I, II & IIIhttp://www.cheniere.org/explore%20articles/mind%20control1/index.htmlMind Control and EM Wave Polarization Transductions - Part I, II & IIIReprinted from "Explore" magazine, 1999http://www.peaceinspace.orghttp://jubilee2012.50webs.com/mind_control.htmhttp://www.daily.pk/world/americas/10183-us-preparing-for-war-with-russia.htmlAmerica is a Free Enterprise based Democray,not a Corporate based totalitarianism.Free Enterprise represents Free America and a Free World. Corporations need PEOPLE and with destruction of "We the People" of the USA/World we have nothing. The only wealth we have to give is that of the Children.- Ron AngellMay 21st 2009"Geheimes Ruland. Moskau -- Die Zombies der roten Zaren" "Secret Russia. Moscow -- The zombies of the red czars"] Russia and USA never should have done joint space missions. NEVER. USA was tricked and fooled by Communists/Fascists. THEY NEED TO THINKTom Bearden: Mind Control and EM Wave Polarization Transductions - Part I, II & IIIhttp://www.cheniere.org/explore%20articles/mind%20control1/index.htmlMind Control and EM Wave Polarization Transductions - Part I, II & IIIReprinted from "Explore" magazine, 1999http://www.peaceinspace.org"What you are will show in what you do" Thomas Alva Edison
Subject: Fw: U.S. Preparing For War With Russia-Lt. Gen. Keith Alexander, also the Pentagon’s leading cyber warfare commander, said the U.S. is determined to lead the global effort to use computer technology to deter or defeat enemies….” [6]To: president@whitehouse.gov, comments@whitehouse.gov, mcmailteam@gmail.com, tijohnfinch@gmail.com, soleilmavis@yahoo.com, monika.stoces@gmail.com, dcr618@msn.com, defend_law@yahoo.ca, v911t@yahoogroups.com, AskDOJ@usdoj.gov, inspector.general@usdoj.gov, inquiries@un.org, info@kucinich.us, info@gp.org, info@aclu-nj.org, info@soaw.org, info@pdamerica.org, info@tutufoundation-usa.org, info@alternet.org, ACLUOnline@aclu.org, AllianceForJustice@afj.org, alw@peaceinspace.org, alerts@truemajority.org, alex@infowars.com, AlGore@algore.com, corpwatch@corpwatch.org, china@un.int, trice554@hotmail.com, xfile@uswest.net, CarolineLucas@GreenMEPs.org.uk, controlledamerica@yahoo.com, civi@europarl.eu.int, codepink@mail.democracyinaction.org, contact@veteransforcommonsense.org, beenydiane@yahoo.com, rize081476@yahoo.com, rrhodes@airamericaradio.com, publiccitizen@mail.democracyinaction.org, p.baird@surveillanceissues.comCc: MCVictimsEU@yahoogroups.com, OTP.InformationDesk@icc-cpi.int, uk@un.int, usa@un.int, peru@un.intDate: Thursday, May 21, 2009, 7:43 AM http://www.daily.pk/world/americas/10183-us-preparing-for-war-with-russia.htmlSubject: U.S. Preparing For War With Russia-Lt. Gen. Keith Alexander, also the Pentagon’s leading cyber warfare commander, said the U.S. is determined to lead the global effort to use computer technology to deter or defeat enemies….” [6]To:Date: Thursday, May 21, 2009, 7:32 AM“Lt. Gen. Keith Alexander, also the Pentagon’s leading cyber warfare commander, said the U.S. is determined to lead the global effort to use computer technology to deter or defeat enemies….” [6]Scalar Mind wars with directed energy and mind control weapons must end..The truth of the mind war weapons must be exposedhttp://mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profiles/blogs/from-tom-beardonhttp://www.cheniere.org/toc2.htmhttp://www.cheniere.org/images/weapons/index.htmlU.S. Preparing For War With RussiaWritten by www.daily.pkMonday, 18 May 2009 04:36“Today the situation is much more serious than before August 2008….[A] possible recurrence of war will not be limited to the Caucasus.“The new President of the United States did not bring about any crucial changes in relation to Georgia, but having a dominant role in NATO he still insists on Georgia’s soonest joining ofthe Alliance. If it happens, the world would face a more serious threat than the crises of the Cold War.Scalar Mind wars with directed energy and mind control weapons must end..The truth of the mind war weapons must be exposedhttp://mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profiles/blogs/from-tom-beardonhttp://www.cheniere.org/toc2.htmhttp://www.cheniere.org/images/weapons/index.htmlhttp://www.cheniere.org/images/weapons/index.htmlWeapons SlidesSecDef Cohen"Others [terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves… So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations…It's real, and that's the reason why we have to intensify our [counterterrorism] efforts." *Secretary of Defense William Cohen at an April 1997 counterterrorism conference sponsored by former Senator Sam Nunn. Quoted from DoD News Briefing, Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, Q&A at the Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy, University of Georgia, Athens, Apr. 28, 1997.Slides(covers period up to 1999)* The Coming Strategic Attack on the United States* Outline* Loss of two separate A-10 Warthogs in 1997* Typical ABM Defenses (Widely Deployed by mid-70s)* Launch Phase Anti-Missile System* Launch Phase Anti-Bomber System* HC-130s Engines Quit, Aircraft CrashesNov. 22, 1996* 1996 Actions by this analyst* Additional Information Exists: Not Analyzed, NotIntegrated in Briefing* Kill of Arrow DC-8, Gander AFB, Dec. 12, 1985* Satellite Photos of Plumes in Soviet Arctic Since 1974See "Fer de Lance" for additional information* Aum Shinrikyo ("Supreme Truth" Cult), Shoko Asahara, LeaderAum Shinrikyo - Anatomy of a Dangerous Cult* Ashkhabad Problem and Its Solution* Strange Characteristics of Iran Quake, Sep. 1978* Iran Earthquake, September 1978* Situation Now (Assessment)* Situation Now (Assessment 2)* Aspects of Strong Local Asymmetry* Mass Casualty Problem: Aerial Anthrax Spray on Washington, D.C.* Present Status of the WMD Threat to the United States* Some Present Problems in the U.S. WMD Defense Capabilities* Internal Terrorist Threat with Weapons of Mass Destruction: Now & Future* Attempt to Ban Energetics Weapons Worldwide* Brezhnev's Schedule* Large glowing Tesla globe witnessed in Red China by hundreds* Cold Explosion -- 9 April 1984 Near Kurils, and formation and growth of spherical shell (globe)Sequence of Events* Cold Explosion -- 9 April 1984 Near Kurils, and formation and growth of spherical shell (globe)What They Were* Cold Explosion -- 9 April 1984 Near Kurils(Plus additional weapons effects)* Countering Insane MAD Systems:Find Loophole, Exploit It* Next Generation Counter to Both Sane and Insane MAD systems* Simultaneous Dudding of Nuclear Weapons Worldwide* Simultaneous Dudding of Nuclear Weapons Worldwide* Operation Divine Wind II* Advanced EMBW Applications* EM Biological Warfare (EMBW)* Microwave Radiation of U.S. Embassy in Moscow* Pentagon EMI Studies, 1989* EM Missile Practice (6 slides)--- On Thu, 5/21/09, Ron Angell wrote:http://www.daily.pk/world/americas/10183-us-preparing-for-war-with-russia.htmlFrom: Ron AngellSubject: U.S. Preparing For War With Russia-Lt. Gen. Keith Alexander, also the Pentagon’s leading cyber warfare commander, said the U.S. is determined to lead the global effort to use computer technology to deter or defeat enemies….” [6]To:Date: Thursday, May 21, 2009, 7:32 AM“Lt. Gen. Keith Alexander, also the Pentagon’s leading cyber warfare commander, said the U.S. is determined to lead the global effort to use computer technology to deter or defeat enemies….” [6]U.S. Preparing For War With RussiaWritten by www.daily.pkMonday, 18 May 2009 04:36“Today the situation is much more serious than before August 2008….[A] possible recurrence of war will not be limited to the Caucasus.“The new President of the United States did not bring about any crucial changes in relation to Georgia, but having a dominant role in NATO he still insists on Georgia’s soonest joining ofthe Alliance. If it happens, the world would face a more serious threat than the crises of the Cold War.“Under the new realities, Georgia’s war against South Ossetia may easily turn into NATO’s war against Russia. This would be a third world war.” (Irina Kadzhaev, South Ossetia political scientist, South Ossetia Information Agency, April 2009On May 12 James Mattis, NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander Transformation [ACT] and commander of the U.S. Joint Forces Command, spoke at a three-day symposium called Joint Warfighting 09 in Norfolk, Virginia, where NATO’s Allied Command Transformation is based, and stated: “I come with a sense of urgency. The enemy is meeting like this as well.” [1]A local newspaper summarized his speech:“Mattis outlined a future in which wars will not have clearly defined beginnings and ends. What is needed, he said, is a grand strategy, a political framework that can guide military planning.” [2]He failed, for what passes for diplomatic reasons no doubt, to identify who “the enemy” is, but a series of recent developments, or rather an intensification of ongoing ones, indicate which nation it is.Last week the head of the U.S. Strategic Command, Gen. Kevin Chilton, told reporters during a Defense Writers Group breakfast on May 7 “that the White House retains the option to respond with physical force – potentially even using nuclear weapons – if a foreign entity conducts a disabling cyber attack against U.S. computer networks….”An account of his talk added “the general insisted that all strike options, including nuclear, would remain available to the commander in chief in defending the nation from cyber strikes.”Chilton “said he could not rule out the possibility of a military salvo against a nation like China, even though Beijing has nuclear arms,” [3] though the likely first target of alleged retaliation against equally alleged cyber attacks would be another nation already identified by US military officials as such: Russia.In late April and early May of 2007 the government of Estonia, which was inducted into NATO in 2004 and whose president was and remains Toomas Hendrik Ilves, born in Sweden and raised in the United States (where he worked for Radio Free Europe), reported attacks on websites in the country which were blamed on Russia.Over two years later no evidence has been presented to substantiate the claim that Russian hackers, much less the government itself, were behind the attacks, though it remains an article of faith among US and other Western officials and media that they were.The response from American authorities in the first place was so sudden and severe, even before investigations were conducted, as to strongly suggest that if the attacks hadn’t been staged they would need to be invented.Right afterward Secretary of the Air Force Michael W. Wynne stated, “Russia, our Cold War nemesis, seems to have been the first to engage in cyber warfare.”The US Air Force news source from which the above is quoted added that the events in Estonia days earlier “did start a series of debates within NATO and the EU about the definition of clear military action and it may be the first test of the applicability of Article V of the NATO charter regarding collective self-defense in the non-kinetic realm.” [4]NATO’s Article 5 is a collective military defense provision, in fact a war clause, one which first and to date for the only time has been used to support the protracted and escalating war in Afghanistan.References to it, then, are not to be taken lightly.On a visit to Estonia last November Pentagon chief Robert Gates met with the country’s prime minister, Andrus Ansip, and “discussed Russian behavior and new cooperation on cyber security….”It was reported that “Ansip said NATO will operate under the principle of Article 5 of the alliance’s treaty, which states that an attack on one ally is treated as an attack on all,” and “We are convinced that Estonia, as a member of NATO, will be very well defended.”[5]That the repeated mention of NATO’s Article 5 continued a year and a half after the alleged cyber attacks when none had occurred in the interim is revealing.At the beginning of this month the Pentagon announced that it was launching what it called a “digital warfare force for the future,” at Fort Meade in Maryland under the control of the U.S. Strategic Command, whose chief, Gen. Kevin Chilton, was quoted earlier as threatening the use of force up to and including nuclear weapons.The initiative was characterized in a news report as follows:“Lt. Gen. Keith Alexander, also the Pentagon’s leading cyber warfare commander, said the U.S. is determined to lead the global effort to use computer technology to deter or defeat enemies….” [6]The Pentagon is a synecdoche for the Department of Defense and everything related to its activities is cloaked in the same euphemism, so when pressed the US will insist its new cyber warfare project is intended for defensive purposes only. Any nation which and people who have been on the receiving end of US Defense Department actions know better. The new US cyber warfare command, its rationale based on a supposed Russian threat emanating from a non-military incident in the Baltics over two years ago, will be used to cripple the computer systems of any nation targeted for direct military assault, thus rendering them defenseless, and will be particularly effective for space-based and Star Wars (missile shield, interceptor missiles) first strike plans.On the same day the report of General Alexander’s pledge to “defeat enemies” appeared another news item reported that “A quasi-classified satellite that will serve as an engineering trailblazer for ballistic missile tracking technologies flew into space Tuesday [May 12].” [7]It was a Space Tracking and Surveillance System Advanced Technology Risk Reduction (STSS-ATRR) satellite, which “is part of a space-based system for the Missile Defense Agency.“Sensors aboard the STSS-ATRR satellite and on the ground will communicate with other systems to defend against incoming ballistic missiles.” [8]A few days earlier the California-based manufacturer Ducommun in a news report titled Ducommun Incorporated Announces Delivery of Nanosatellites to U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command announced that “its Miltec Corporation subsidiary delivered flight-ready nanosatellites to the U.S. Army pace and Missile Defense Command/Army Forces Strategic Command (USASMDC/ARSTRAT) in Huntsville, Alabama on April 28, 2009.”The delivery was “the completion of the first U.S. Army satellite development program since the Courier 1B communications satellite in 1960.”[9]Military satellites used for neutralizing the potential of a rival nation not so much to launch a first strike but to respond to one blur the distinction between so-called Son of Star Wars missile shield projects and full-fledged militarization of space.A recent Russian commentary saw it in just that manner:“Withdrawal from the 1972 ABM Treaty signified a switch to the testing and deployment of a global missile defense system, with a view to fully removing the deterrent potential of China, and partially that of Russia.“Washington [is] still trying to eliminate international legal restrictions on the formation of a system, which would theoretically make it invulnerable towards an act of retaliation, and even a launch-under-attack strike.” [10]Added to which is another “quasi-classified” subterfuge related to a prospective resumption of Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) talks between the US And Russia.American Assistant Secretary of State Rose Gottemoeller stated this week “that the US is not prepared to cut warheads removed from delivery means and kept in storage.” [11]So in addition to US plans to deploy ground-, sea-, air- and space-based anti-missile systems primarily around and against Russia (Poland, the Czech Republic, Norway, Britain, Japan and Alaska to date), the Pentagon will hold in reserve nuclear warheads for activation without a monitoring mechanism provided to Russian inspectors and arms reduction negotiators.On May 6 Euronews conducted an interview with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, who warned, “The way it [the US anti-ballistic missile shield] is designed has nothing to do with Iran’s nuclear program. It is aimed at Russian strategic forces, deployed in the European part of the Russian Federation.” [12]To add to the concerns of Russia and other nations, On April 30 the US established a Navy Air and Missile Defense Command (NAMDC) at the Naval Support Facility at Dahlgren, Virginia.“NAMDC is the lead organization for Navy, joint and combined Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD). NAMDC serves as the single warfare center of excellence to synchronize and integrate Navy efforts across the full spectrum of air and missile defense to include air defense, cruise missile defense and ballistic missile defense.” [13]The past two weeks has been a fertile period for stories in this vein and, to bring attention nearer the Earth, the US-based Strategy Page reported from a Russian source that “The United States has bought two Su-27 fighter jets from Ukraine” to “be used to train American military pilots, who may face opponents in them” and that the “US military will use them to test its radar and electronic warfare equipment.” [14]This was at the very moment that the US client in Ukraine, President Viktor Yushchenko, his national poll ratings plummeting to near 1%, signed a directive to prepare for full NATO membership and a few days after a US military delegation visited the country to inspect a tank unit and to plan “reforming the system of combat training….” [15]In terms of US training for warfare against the Russian Air Force, the Ukrainian development is only the latest in a number of such activities.Immediately following the nation becoming a full member of NATO, the US 81st Fighter Squadron flew to Constanta, Romania (in which nation the Pentagon has acquired four new bases since) to engage in combat training against Russian MiG-21s.According to one US pilot present, “It was pretty neat – you’re sitting in a MiG-21 that will be airborne with a MiG-21 pilot within days. This was an arm of the Soviet Union. These pilots were flying before the Soviet Union fell. They have quite a bit of perspective.” [16]In July of the next year the US 492nd Fighter Squadron was deployed to the Graf Ignatievo Air Base in neighoring Bulgaria to insure the opportunity for “Air Forces from multiple nations to learn about each other’s aircraft tactics and capabilities.“The pilots of the F-15E Strike Eagles and the MIG-29s and MIG-21s are sharing knowledge of aircraft and tactics as the exercise wraps up its first week of training.”A US Air Force colonel was quoted as saying, “Only two of the 38 aircrew members have had a chance to fly against MIGs. By the time the exercise is over, everyone will have had a chance to either fly in a MIG or fly against one.” [17]A month afterward the US Air Force 22nd Expeditionary Fighter Squadron arrived in Romania for the Viper Lance exercises which “marked the first time U.S. F-16 pilots have trained in Romania” and “where “MiG-21 and F-16 pilots [flew] integrated formations to conduct basic fighter maneuvers, dissimilar air combat training and air-to-ground strike missions….” [18]This time the quote is from an F-16 Fighting Falcon pilot:“My flight in the backseat of a Lancer [MiG-21] is a good opportunity to look at different aircraft and it’s a real privilege and an honor. I want to see what they see from their cockpit, and view a new angle of understanding against our adversaries.” [19]Two weeks ago a US Air Force fighter squadron flew to the Bezmer Air Base in Bulgaria where an American airman said, “This is the first time a USAFE [United States Air Forces in Europe] fighter squadron has deployed to this location….The most rewarding part of this experience is knowing that I am helping the pilots train for war.” [20]To prepare the US for air combat against the full range of Russian military aircraft, India was invited to the annual Red Flag air combat exercises in Alaska in 2007, war games “meant to train pilots from the US, NATO and other allied countries for real combat situations.“This includes the use of ‘enemy’ hardware and live ammunition for bombing exercises.” [21]India provided six Sukhoi SU-30MKI fighters which were “particularly interesting to the exercise as [they are] Russian-made, thustraditionally considered ‘hostile.’” [22]May 1st, on the occasion of the Czech Republic taking over the six-month NATO air patrol rotation in the Baltic skies over Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania – five minutes flight from Russia’s second largest city of St. Petersburg – a Czech official boasted “The area we are protecting is about three times larger than that of the Czech Republic. This is a NATO outpost.”Lithuanian Air Force Commander Arturas Leita announced that “the Baltic countries would probably ask for the prolongation of the air force mission within NATO until 2018.” [23]From June 8-16 Sweden will host a NATO drill, Loyal Arrow, described as “biggest air force drill ever in the Finnish-Swedish Bothnian Bay,” [24], also not far from St. Petersburg, with a British aircraft carrier and more than 50 fighter jets participating.That exercise will begin exactly a week after the US-led NATO Cooperative Lancer 09 war games end in Georgia on Russia’s southern flank.In speaking of the dangers of the last-named but with equal application to all that has preceded it, the South Ossetian Ministry for Press and Mass Media website recently quoted political scientist Irina Kadzhaev as warning:“Today the situation is much more serious than before August 2008. The then threat endangered only South Ossetia and Abkhazia, but after Russia’s recognition of these states’ independence and the conclusion of agreements envisaging the presence of Russian armed forces on their territories, a possible recurrence of war will not be limited to the Caucasus.“The new President of the United States did not bring about any crucial changes in relation to Georgia, but having a dominant role in NATO he still insists on Georgia’s soonest joining of the Alliance. If it happens, the world would face a more serious threat than the crises of the Cold War.“Under the new realities, Georgia’s war against South Ossetia may easily turn into NATO’s war against Russia. This would be a third world war.”A Manhattan Project Is Required to Rapidly Develop and Implement
http://www.cheniere.org/briefings/circuitcurrents/index.htmlThe Tom BeardenWebsiteEdward Munch's "Scream"A Visual Tour of what they don't want you to know about electrical circuits10 TRILLION PERCENT OF THE CURRENT PRODUCED IS WASTED!1. The scalar potential is a harmonic set of phase conjugate longitudinal EM waves.2. The dipole is a true negative resistor.3. The dipole's broken 3-symmetry initiates a spreading giant negentropic reordering of a fraction of the vacuum's energy.4. Energy flow contours surrounding a transmission line.5. Heaviside and Poynting energy flow components. The Heaviside component is often 10 trillion times the Poynting component, but is simply wasted in ordinary single-pass energy circuits.6. Negative resistance process v. positive resistance process.7. Lorentz's integration trick to discard the enormous Heaviside non-diverged energy flow component.8. Why present systems have COP<1.0 in conventional 2-wire closed circuit operationhttp://www.cheniere.org/briefings/circuitcurrents/index.htmlhttp://www.cheniere.org/briefings/index.html
Briefings
A candid shot taken during the filming of the Documentary Science Series
ENERGY FROM THE VACUUM
