Bill (4)
The Neuro-Specific Human Rights Bill
Shad Budge started this petition to all of humanity
By signing this petition, I support the efforts of enacting this bill into the legislation of every country across the globe.
Visit our website here: www.globalneuroethics.com
Neuro-Specific Human Rights Bill
Rapid advancements in human neuroscience and neurotechnology open unprecedented possibilities for accessing, collecting, sharing and manipulating information from the human brain. Such applications raise important challenges to human rights principles that need to be addressed to prevent misuse or unintended negative consequences. This proposal assesses the implications of emerging neurotechnology applications in the context of the human rights framework and suggests that existing human rights are not sufficient to respond to these emerging issues. After analysing the relationship between neuroscience and human rights, we identify four new neuro-specific human rights that will be vital in the effort of protecting the human brain: the right to cognitive liberty, the right to mental privacy, the right to mental integrity, and the right to psychological continuity.
The right to cognitive liberty
The right of individuals to use emerging neurotechnologies as well the protection of individuals from the coercive and unconsented use of such technologies. The right and freedom to control one’s own consciousness and electrochemical thought processes is the necessary substrate for just about every other freedom. Cognitive liberty is necessary to all other liberties, because it is their neuro-cognitive substrate. As such, cognitive liberty resembles the notion of ‘freedom of thought’ which is usually considered the essential justification of other freedoms such as freedom of choice, freedom of speech, freedom of press, and freedom of religion. Cognitive liberty is a conceptual update of freedom of thought that takes into account the power we now have, and increasingly will have to monitor, manipulate, and alter cognitive functions. Some legal scholars such as Boire and Sententia have interpreted the right to cognitive liberty with special focus on the protection of individual freedom and self-determination from the State. For example, Sententia has claimed that “the State cannot forcibly manipulate the mental states, and implicitly the brain states of individual citizens”.
Given its conceptual complexity, cognitive liberty is multi-dimensional. Bublitz recognizes at least three “interrelated but not identical dimensions”. These are: (i) the liberty to change one’s mind or to choose whether and by which means to change one’s mind; (ii) the protection of interventions into other minds to protect mental integrity, and (iii) the ethical and legal obligation to promoting cognitive liberty. These three dimensions configure cognitive liberty as a complex right which involves the prerequisites of both negative and positive liberties: the negative liberty of making choices about one’s own cognitive domain in absence of governmental or non-governmental obstacles, barriers or prohibitions; the negative liberty of exercising one’s own right to mental integrity in absence of constraints or violations from corporations, criminal agents or the government; and finally, the positive liberty of having the possibility of acting in such a way as to take control of one’s mental life.
The right to mental privacy
The formal recognition of a right to mental privacy, which aims to protect any bit or set of brain information about an individual recorded by a neurodevice. This right would protect brainwaves not only as data but also as data generators or sources of information. In addition, it would cover not only conscious brain data but also data that is not under voluntary and conscious control. Finally, it guarantees the protection of brain information in absence of an external tool for identifying and filtering that information. Paul Wolpe has suggested that due to fears of government oppression, we should draw a bright line around the use of mind-reading technologies:
“The skull should be designated as a domain of absolute privacy. No one should be able to probe an individual’s mind against their will. We should not permit it with a court order. We should not permit it for military or national security. We should forgo the use of the technology under coercive circumstances even though using it may serve the public good”
Similarly, it has been argued by J Stanley that “non-consensual mind reading is not something we should ever engage in”. The claim is that mind-reading techniques constitute “a fundamental affront to human dignity”. Consequently, “we must not let our civilization’s privacy principles degrade so far that attempting to peer inside a person’s own head against their will ever become regarded as acceptable”. In short, the right to mental privacy is to protect people against access to their brain information and to prevent the indiscriminate leakage of brain data across the infosphere.
The right to mental integrity
This reconceptualized right should provide a specific normative protection from potential neurotechnology-enabled interventions involving the unauthorized alteration of a person’s neural computation and potentially resulting in direct harm to the victim. For an action to qualify as a threat to mental integrity, it has to: (i) involve the direct access to and/or manipulation of neural signaling (ii) be unauthorized –i.e. must occur in absence of the informed consent of the signal generator. As neurotechnology becomes part of the digital ecosystem and neural computation rapidly enters the infosphere, the mental integrity of individuals will be increasingly endangered if specific protective measures are not implemented. The forced intrusion into and alteration of a person’s neural processes pose an unprecedented threat to a person’s mental integrity.
The growing field of memory engineering will likely represent a paramount challenge to the right to mental integrity. Several techniques have been developed to engineer, boost, or selectively erase memories from a person’s mind. For example, Nabavi and colleagues used an optogenetics technique to erase and subsequently restore selected memories by applying a stimulus via optical laser that selectively strengthens or weakens synaptic connections. These findings may hold big potential for the treatment of such diseases as Alzheimer’s and PTSD. At the same time, however, the misuse of these techniques by malevolent actors may generate unprecedented opportunities for mental manipulation and brainwashing. On the long term-scenario, they could be used by surveillance and security agencies with the purpose of selectively erasing dangerous or inconvenient memories from people’s brains as portrayed in the movie Men in Black with the so-called neuralyzer. The potential motives of illicit memory alteration are various, including increasing national security or exerting control over individuals or groups.
The right to psychological continuity
The right to psychological continuity can be seen as a special neuro-focused instance of the right to identity. What the right to psychological continuity aims to prevent is the induced alteration of neural functioning. The right to psychological continuity will protect the mental substrates of personal identity from unconscious and unconsented alteration by third parties through the use of invasive or non-invasive neurotechnology.
In addition to mental privacy and mental integrity, people’s perception of their own identity may be put at risk by inadequate uses of emerging neurotechnology. Changes in brain function caused by brain stimulation may also cause unintended alterations in mental states critical to personality, and can thereby affect an individual’s personal identity. In particular, it has been observed that brain stimulation may have an impact on the psychological continuity of the person, i.e. the crucial requirement of personal identity consisting in experiencing oneself as persisting through time as the same person. Several cases have been reported in scientific literature in which deep brain stimulation (DBS) has led to behavioral changes such as increased impulsivity and aggressiveness or changes in sexual behavior. A study involving patients treated with DBS showed that more than half of them articulated a feeling of strangeness and unfamiliarity with themselves after surgery “I do not feel like myself anymore”; “I feel like a robot”. In parallel, memory engineering technologies may impact a person’s identity by selectively removing, altering, adding or replacing individual memories that are relevant to their self-recognition as persons.
However, threats to this right are more likely to happen outside clinical settings. For instance, in the context of intelligence and military agencies, it has been reported that over the last decades violations of human rights have taken place in experiments involving brain implants, drug administrations, electromagnetic shock therapy, sensory deprivation, isolation, physical, psychological, verbal and sexual abuse, hypnosis, the attempted creation of Manchurian candidates, the implantation of false memories and induction of amnesia. Most of these experiments were conducted on unwitting and helpless civilians and in the absence of any external review or representation for the experimental subjects or any meaningful follow-up. The new knowledge and technologies in the field of neuroscience clearly offer new and more efficient possibilities for carrying out unconsented personality changes. For example, Pycroft recently reported the concern that brain implants like DBS are vulnerable to attack by third parties who want to exert malicious control over the users’ brain activity. They called this risk of modification of a person’s brain activity through unauthorized use of neuro devices by third parties ‘brainjacking’.
Negative consequences of brainjacking include (i) information theft, which would result in a violation of the right to mental privacy; (ii) cessation of stimulation, draining implant batteries, inducing tissue damage, and impairment of motor function, which would result in violations of the right to mental integrity. However, some possible consequences of brainjacking such as alteration of impulse control, modification of emotions or affect, induction of pain, and modulation of the reward system could be achieved even in absence of any violation of mental privacy and integrity. In those circumstances of unauthorized modification of the cognitive-emotional-affective dimension a different type of human right violation seems to be at stake: the violation of the right to psychological continuity.
In short, the right to psychological continuity ultimately tends to preserve personal identity and the coherence of the individual’s behavior from unconsented modification by third parties. It protects the continuity across a person’s habitual thoughts, preferences, and choices by protecting the underlying neural functioning.
Conclusion
The volume and variety of neurotechnology applications is rapidly increasing inside and outside the clinical and research setting. The ubiquitous distribution of cheaper, scalable and easy-to-use neuroapplications has the potential of opening unprecedented opportunities at the brain-machine interface level and making neurotechnology intricately embedded in our everyday life. While this technological trend may generate immense advantage for society in many ways, its implications for ethics and the law remain largely unexplored. We argue that in the light of the disruptive change that neurotechnology is determining in the digital ecosystem, the normative terrain should be urgently prepared to prevent misuse or unintended negative consequences. In addition, given the fundamental character of the neurocognitive dimension, we argue that such normative response should not exclusively focus on tort law but also on foundational issues at the level of human right law.
This proposal of neuro-specific human rights in response to emerging advancements in neurotechnology is consistent with and a logical continuation of the proposal of developing genetic-specific human rights in response to advancements in genetics and genomics as set out by the Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights, and the International Declaration on Human Genetic Data.
The freedom of thought, freedom from slavery, torture and inhumane or degrading treatment or punishment are regarded by international human rights law as not subject to any exceptions and, therefore, as absolute rights. Absolute rights cannot be limited for any reason. No circumstance justifies a qualification or limitation of absolute rights. Absolute rights cannot be suspended or restricted, even during a declared state of emergency. The right to cognitive liberty, the right to mental privacy, the right to mental integrity, and the right to psychological continuity should also be enacted into law as absolute rights.
All credit for the Neuro-Specific Human Rights proposal belongs to Dr. Marcello Ienca and Dr. Roberto Andorno. Excerpts from their paper have been used in an effort to enact new human rights. https://lsspjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1
Alert!
I have suffered difficulties due to persecution on my social channels.
Today, I verified serious errors in the transcriptions of my speeches in videos and in Portuguese, which is my native language.
The shock was great when I went to read the entire transcript to translate it into English, there were many excerpts that were totally distorted and that could compromise.
Notice to everyone who forbids subtitles in their videos, and when making videos, do in monor time and write the transcript or its text in the video presentation, enunciated, space for the title, "show more".
WATCH OUT!
The democratic order does not allow CENSORSHIP, so the organized crime system has used different technical strategies that are imperceptible to most TI victims who, during publications, are often on violent attacks to be dismissed.
Naly de Araújo Leite
Alerta!
Tenho sofrido dificuldades por perseguições em meus canais sociais.
Hoje, verifiquei gravíssimos erros nas transcrições das minhas falas em vídeos e em Português que é minha língua nativa.
O susto foi grande quando fui ler toda a transcrição para traduzir para inglês, haviam muitos trechos totalmente distorcidos e que poderiam comprometer.
Aviso a todos que proíbam legendas em seus vídeos, e ao fazer vídeos,façam em menor tempo e escrevam a transcrição ou seu texto na apresentação do vídeo, enunciado, espaço destinado ao título, "mostrar mais".
CUIDADO!
A ordem democrática não permite CENSURA,portanto o sistema do crime organizado tem usado estratégias técnicas diversas imperceptíveis a maioria das vítimas TIs que,muitas vezes,durante publicações estão sobre violentos ataques para serem destituídos de atenção.
Naly de Araújo Leite
Alerte!
J'ai rencontré des difficultés en raison de la persécution sur mes canaux sociaux.
Aujourd'hui, j'ai vérifié de graves erreurs dans les transcriptions de mes discours en vidéos et en portugais, qui est ma langue maternelle.
Le choc fut grand quand je suis allé lire la transcription entière pour la traduire en anglais, il y avait beaucoup d'extraits qui étaient totalement déformés et qui pouvaient compromettre.
Avis à tous ceux qui interdisent les sous-titres dans leurs vidéos, et lors de la réalisation de vidéos, faites-le en temps réel et écrivez la transcription ou son texte dans la présentation vidéo, énoncée, espace pour le titre, "afficher plus".
ATTENTION!
L'ordre démocratique ne permet pas la CENSURE, de sorte que le système du crime organisé a utilisé différentes stratégies techniques qui sont imperceptibles pour la plupart des victimes de TI qui, lors des publications, sont souvent victimes d'attaques violentes, doivent être rejetées.
Naly de Araújo Leite
Предупреждение!
Я столкнулся с трудностями из-за преследований в социальных сетях.
Сегодня я подтвердил серьезные ошибки в транскрипции своих выступлений в видео и на португальском языке, который является моим родным языком.
Шок был велик, когда я пошел читать всю стенограмму, чтобы перевести ее на английский, было много отрывков, которые были полностью искажены и могли пойти на компромисс.
Обратите внимание на всех, кто запрещает субтитры в своих видео, и при создании видео, сделайте это в монорреальное время и запишите транскрипт или его текст в видеопрезентации, выделите место для заголовка, «показать больше».
ВНИМАНИЕ!
Демократический порядок не допускает цензуру, поэтому система организованной преступности использовала различные технические стратегии, которые незаметны для большинства жертв ТИ, которые во время публикаций часто совершают насильственные нападения, чтобы их отклонить.
Нали де Араужо Лейте
RELIGIOUS AND FAMILY INSTITUTIONS AT RISK WITH TECHNOLOGY AND MKULTRA MANUAL
TRANSCRIÇÃO:
00:01
good night everyone i am naly
good evening
00:05
to the ALEIVIMAPOIA group supports VICTIMS TIs
00:09
from Brazil and I'm here today to
00:12
talk to you a little bit
00:13
people asking why everything is
00:16
very dispersed and we can't
00:18
forget that we are activists and
00:22
we are victims at the same time,
then all
00:25
and any psychological and psychic condition
00:29
he comes from a criminal system
00:34
control and if that
00:38
control is not done in the melee
00:41
you stay inside your house or in
00:43
your school in any ambient space
00:45
you are being monitored
00:47
we will also redo our speech in
00:51
issue of monitoring the organism
00:55
for example, human intestine,
when is it
00:58
your gut is working as it is
01:00
that your gut is functioning until the
01:02
control when you should eliminate
01:05
gases or not because such a control
01:09
rides because we are mice of
01:11
laboratory
01:12
it is very easy for a person, authority, to leave the
01:16
action at the time of a political meeting
01:18
public for example if you have with the
01:22
monitored organism and the
01:25
external control, control can generate shame in
01:28
full meeting if the system causes you to release gases
01:38
all of this occurs and can occur
01:42
now is not in line with your
01:45
command the brain neuro this is what i
01:47
I think it's important for everyone to understand us
01:51
we are, we are and stay not where we
01:55
we are and we want to be
01:57
we are taken out to Data Processing Center says that
02:01
DPD - processing center
02:05
Dice
02:05
we are
02:07
on cameras and computer screens
02:10
that's where we're all
02:14
procedures nerve reactions conduction
02:17
synapses stimulus are there that's what
02:21
I want to make it very clear you doubt it or
02:25
no i'm not worrying about the
02:28
who believes because the height of
2:30
hypocrisy you go into an office
02:32
doctor and the doctor look at you with a face
02:35
crap for NOT saying anything else
02:39
doctors, professionals claim to know nothing and have never heard of this technology
02:42
and if there is technology
02:45
and the person graduates from the College and goes to the field he has to
02:48
update
02:50
I am saying that they are naughty, many professionals and are
02:52
within the usufruct of guinea pig rats
02:56
that is us
all professionals in all areas have an obligation
03:01
professional and ethical search
03:04
knowledge because it is inexcusable
03:09
you enter inside an office
03:12
doctor and happen
03:15
certain facts and serious because
03:20
they do what they can do with
03:22
you inside the office you cannot
03:24
get out of there and go to the police station
03:27
because otherwise half a dozen with the face of
3:30
shit looking at you will say you
03:33
you are crazy
03:34
I asked all Senators so much
03:38
I asked the Federal Deputies and
03:41
state political entities that descend
03:45
to the target citizen at the police station service in accordance with the issue
03:49
and also in health, emergency room emergency room
03:52
service is not better but a
03:57
professional and ethical service
4:00 am
Tis victims when attack came but
4:05
happens what happened
04:08
made a law is
04:11
even on the cover of a profile of one of mine
04:13
channels with Marta Suplicy where it would
04:17
necessary by establishing special field
04:19
to be filled in with the following information
04:21
if you are a person with capacity
04:23
mental or not
this field has always existed this
04:27
parameter if it existed and that change must have another meaning
4:30
to the detriment of some disability that the
04:33
person who is there denouncing the fact or
04:36
reporting who committed
04:38
if you have a disability
04:42
Police Report has no space for specifying ITs as requested by political authorities
04:44
type. frame for mental disability other for disability
04:46
a small box for each item does not
04:49
disability and now we have this
04:52
special attention between quotation marks
04:55
with a mental disability has arrived
4:57
at the police station told a story like IT and psychotronic crimes
05:00
conclude that it's history with is not true
05:03
real story, but fanciful and the whistleblower TIs may be marked in the police report as having "mental problems"
05:07
usually does not take the trouble to
05:09
ask so and this is
05:11
happening today it's been 10 years that we
05:13
is publishing is fighting it wasn't
05:15
hour more what is happening that the
05:17
investigative work is the police
05:20
judicial authority of the judiciary is not
05:22
victim
is our case, Police demand
05:25
we have to prove
05:27
we have to present the names we
05:29
we have to report each company, but if we do,
05:32
how long will we last?
05:33
if you start doing that I’ve never seen
05:39
so much contradiction in terms of comparing
05:42
the legislature in black on white and what is
05:44
practiced in Brazil
05:47
we are not the ones who have to put the
05:51
face on display and point the indicator at
05:55
who are the criminals is a crime
05:57
organized against ITs that are
06:02
victims and who
06:07
that is part of this organized crime is the
seller is what creates is what builds is
06:16
the businessman is the doctor is the psychologist
06:21
the psychiatrist is an engineer is a group
06:26
organized crime people are a group
06:28
able and taking what the doctor earns at the post
06:32
public health is nothing, it can win
06:35
much more if he is one of
06:38
participants one of the informants one of the
06:41
instruments used by crime
06:43
organized
06:44
this has to be clear i'm not talking
06:46
medical or health problems
06:48
public is specifically, but I don't
06:52
can i lie
06:53
they are part they are if I hadn't
06:56
feeling in the skin
06:59
I might doubt people,
but when
07:02
people are feeling in the skin there is no way
07:04
doubt and have no doubts
07:07
I'm telling the truth
07:11
my mother told me to leave the house
07:14
90's
07:15
my mother told me to leave the course
07:18
right in the 80s I stamped my foot
07:02
people are feeling in the skin there is no way
07:04
doubt and have no doubts
07:07
I'm telling the truth
07:11
my mother told me to leave the house
07:14
90's
07:15
my mother told me to leave the course
07:18
right in the 80s I stamped my foot
07:22
I got a scholarship and had to work with the assistant
07:24
Social
and I worked four hours at
07:26
University not to leave the course
07:28
I was extremely tortured
07:31
electronic classroom and humiliated
07:34
even when I went into the bathroom
07:35
make physiological needs
07:39
when my mom asked to leave
07:41
home because I said I wanted to have one
07:43
son to "I raise as a mother", but that already
07:46
I had heard threats for the crime
07:48
organized psychotronic, through these terms
7:50
of synthetic telepathy by daughter of
07:52
businessman that my father would not have
7:55
descendants
07:56
I already had a daughter
07:59
that they raised as a daughter I couldn't
08:01
take from them for it will have offspring
08:04
and he had no grandson and I said the
08:07
my father's first grandson
who will have only me
08:10
four years to get pregnant, but I got pregnant as an independent producer
08:12
I had a son with independent production and I kept my promise, my life goal and I responded to organized crime
08:15
so I’m fighting I don’t let
08:20
take my freedom I paid a price
08:21
I am still paying dearly, but I have a wonderful and dear son
08:24
a son that God gave me exactly as
08:25
I wanted, this Organized Crime power doesn't have this
08:28
power is from God
08:33
I suffered a lot ... when I left the cesarean
08:36
during cesarean section ... I almost died at the time of
08:37
anesthesia
08:38
I didn’t touch anything I felt
08:42
occupation by my head I think
08:44
that the time in my head and I launched
08:45
the space
08:47
the anesthesiologist went through with me I
08:50
I had to communicate with him, blinking my eyes as he requested
08:52
one blink was yes and two blinks was
08:56
no
I just thought God that
9 am
if I gave me this son
09:03
for my life help me
09:06
strong and handsome boy was born
09:09
they left me 8 hours without seeing the boy
09:11
I had no father and mother with me in my family
09:14
it was alone
09:15
I was asked to leave the house if I wanted to have a child
09:18
so I left the house as my mother asked me to.
09:19
I left the noble sector of Goiânia and went to live
09:21
on the periphery where people all died
09:23
days, this is how Psychotronic Organized Crime does with the lives of ITs
09:28
he is the one who launches us,
is he who throws is
09:32
unknown knowledge hands
09:34
to include the family against us
09:38
then they isolate us weakens us
09:42
makes it impossible for us to stay
09:44
vulnerable and at the mercy of what they want
09:46
to do we cease to exist
09:48
my goal my purpose I achieved
09:51
I stamped my foot and faced
09:52
all these years, but that was
09:55
extremely significant my life
9:57
so right want to leave
10:00 am
this message to you ... is we are victims
10:03
crimes and psychotronics ... you don't know exactly what it means,
10:05
you can write the word PSYCHOTRONIA on your google
10:07
yes I am nightly from spending nights and nights researching, I fight for the future of my children
10:12
and I publish it because I already have more than 50
10:15
years,
but my children I want that one day
10:20
be parents
10:21
I want them to have descendants
10:24
rebuke that damned prophecy thrown at me and my father by the mouth
10:27
of this snake daughter of a businessman
10:29
over there,
strong and powerful entrepreneur, one of
10:33
organized crime heads
10:35
so i want you know the following no
10:37
is melee coping is not
10:41
rebellion is to invade the radio and
10:43
television none of this solves
10:45
we are already on the website
10:46
television even without our consent
10:48
you don't know, but we are inside the car radios, and when the car stops
10:50
on your doorstep, people inside it tune their brainwaves into
10:53
radio I've tried to figure out how it happens
10:55
ps victims' thoughts are possible to hear
10:58
inside the radio and nobody offers or lends to be a witness to the ITs
11:02
no one says he will accompany TIs to the Police Depegacia as a witness
11:04
it's true .... nobody
11:07
everyone is afraid .... think ....
who is that
11:09
want to spend what we spend what
11:11
people declare that it is true
11:14
right so this is it is in strength in faith
11:16
I want to ask you not to give up that
11:19
don't give up i'm not telling the
11:21
my life for you with the intention of "starting disputes of lived suffering"
11:23
there has already been a disagreement in the group for that reason
11:25
people wanted to dispute "who had suffered the most in life within this psychotronic system"
11:32
I'm giving my testimony on my
11:34
communication channel
11:37
exercising freedom of expression that
11:39
I can still use this I don't know
11:41
even when they block everything
11:43
the channel publishes
11:44
they control my computer and
11:46
externally my television any
11:49
electronics
people are through the network
11:51
electrical wiring is through the network certain controls
11:55
you observe I did a test I already suffered for
11:58
damn it
11:59
every time I move from place to place
12:01
another two-week-old folks come in Aneel's company to control electricity costs
12:05
and comes the electricity supplier
12:06
and move the pole that has the wiring that comes and goes
12:09
from my home
12:10
already tried to convince myself that it could be
12:12
paranoia, but the facts did not let convincing happen
12:15
another thing you know has several videos from the city of Ipameri in the state of Goiás
12:18
are denunciative videos that indicate how much I was stolen in relation to energy consumption
12:20
shamelessly
12:22
I went hungry in this municipality with my family
12:24
I went hungry I didn't even have anything to eat
12:27
at home
12:28
they stealing electricity from me until the
12:31
day they cut it and I let it cut
12:34
still invaded my house, jumping over my wall and uprooted
12:37
my watch without my consent and
12:39
without my authorization
12:47
my neighbor had everything
12:49
appliances 4 people living in the house, machine
12:54
six pack freezer refrigerator is computer
12:58
it's all inside everything and then I
13:05
arrived at the end of the month she paid 50
13:07
real energy I had nothing and just
13:10
give birth from 18h
13:14
nothing at home nothing I didn't even have one
13:16
blender
13:18
it was just television and a shower
13:21
for me the 116 reais
13:25
has no condition what they abuse
13:28
we know i think is the energy
13:31
established in that communication will
13:33
also of electric power so we
13:36
we are paying on the energy bill
13:38
built-in electric
13:40
we are paying what it is is the
13:44
invasion monitoring that they commit to
13:47
our privacy inside our home
13:49
their interference in our
13:51
electronics, our television in the
13:53
shower even in energy power
13:57
electrical you know very well that it is possible ....
13:59
exercise external control in
14:01
shower here at my house
14:03
if I have the dimension and direction
14:06
of this electric current
14:08
you know that the psychotronic system can act on it
14:11
about electric power direction and power
14:17
nothing is impossible if the system wants to blow a
14:20
shower in a person's head the system can
14:23
example what they did with sergio rangel from Irajá in Rio de Janeiro, I talked about him
14:25
in the council of sorocaba
14:27
the size of the wound that opened in the butt
hit him, he was shot inside the bathroom
14:33
at parents' house
14:35
everyone ran to
14:37
help and blisters were formed as a burn people look is the
14:42
next we're ashamed in the face
14:45
all of us
14:46
who is not ashamed in the face is the
14:48
system is society for accepting this
14:52
kind of affront and we have to have a lot of care that they are
14:53
rubbing a lot of people's heads
14:56
are putting to hear us
14:58
people who are known to us
14:59
church people we attend in the past or present
15:02
I have warned about this issue
15:04
organized crime believes that when we recognize people by the voices we hear
15:06
system believes that we will go backwards
15:09
and change your mind when complaints
15:11
organized crime is trying to leave the field without
15:14
punishment of the judiciary over the criminal organization and are under
15:16
legal and legal advice
15:18
militant lawyers
do not let yourself be overwhelmed
15:22
do not be discouraged, and more always write what happens
15:25
because you will not be able to report everything
15:28
it was done with you over the years,
15:32
the memory of many people is already going
15:33
this memory-taking system exists
15:37
was used in the 1940s in orphanages
15:48
the children who were
15:49
set aside to be abused and returned
15:51
they went through medication treatments, brainwashing and hypnosis
15:52
in quotes psychiatric psychological treatment
15:55
to be used again
because every child
15:58
was taken by a big man of politics and society
16:02
and there was a bonus for the director of the orphanage
16:07
already have everything
16:09
this published with link with translation that
16:12
it's not even a national site that is not always all public
16:15
so that's what they're doing like these
16:17
ITs may lose memory if
16:20
you do not write down day by day and certain
16:23
facts until the time I always talked
16:25
keep your computer on
16:27
sit there and let it on the windows put the day on
16:29
start of the day
16:31
if you spend the whole night suffering some
16:33
type of attack abuse that is normal for victims and
16:36
common, occurs every day, so I say normal
16:37
you will write it down
16:40
I believe that anyone can understand in this way how psychotronic tortures occur
16:54
If you...
we will get rid of this
16:57
system I am arrested and you are arrested
17:18
what I want is the
17:20
next i want to get out of that system
17:22
I want compensation and I go further
17:26
I have no more plans to continue
17:27
changing this country
17:28
I know that in every country in the world
17:30
we know my video I already know
17:33
a lot of people outside understood that they are
17:36
victims and anywhere we go
17:38
live we will find
17:40
with victims
17:41
so I want it before I leave the
17:43
Brazil stop being a victim
17:45
victim of a marginal criminal system
17:47
growing that is like
17:50
eduardo bolsonaro spoke is not right no
17:53
is on the left but there in between and
17:55
who controls the brazil system
17:58
but in this group there are people from brazil
18:00
people in Brazil who are in Brazil
18:02
because you have a company because in a network
18:04
stores because it has heir business but
18:08
who wanted to be out there
18:11
and cannot and disagrees with
18:13
everything that exists since i can't leave
18:15
i will change everything that is
18:17
happening here in Brazil why not
18:19
those who have money think they can do everything and
18:22
the more money you earn but still
18:24
what about the campaign that sew refers to women's right to say NO to a man's harassment and attacks
18:27
doesn't happen
6:30 pm
because they practice violence against women ITs
18:34
and nobody says NO
18:37
enough
18:39
That does not exist
18:41
that's what they say
18:49
how much women are suffering this
18:51
electronic there soon the crime
18:56
organized will turn into that sentence
18:59
did with one did with all goes more to
19:01
reality that will be the day that good
19:04
connect infinites understood and when a
19:09
woman raped on skin skin on flesh
19:12
the meat all good to hear the screams and not
7:15 pm
I felt the pain that is what knows it what
19:17
it also happens with our
19:18
today there will be tested one
19:22
truth really did with all because
19:26
they have this power
19:29
right and there is no politician in Brazil
19:31
that is not afraid and not commanded
19:35
how did everything get out of my head
19:37
of those who are using the accessory
19:40
the collar on the ankle
19:43
do you think it's really happened
19:45
that way they attended in
19:48
spoke and gave themselves up to their whistleblowers
19:52
organized crime provided ways to get everything out of their minds
19:54
the psychotic system does that
19:57
so their fear is great and they don't assume
20:05
politicians thought it best to surrender
20:06
voluntarily arranged the
20:09
whistleblowers because it is a formality
20:10
legal legal and everybody
20:14
was arrested for corruption and for stealing Brazil
8:15 pm
think if they will want to stay with
20:18
the body at the disposal of rape and
20:21
abuses of every amount in the hands of people
20:24
and suffering everything that we
20:26
declares every day that he is suffering would be
20:29
the fear the fear
20:32
then they cannot with system and if the
20:36
people give up now there will be no child
20:38
that doesn't go to the pedophile's table
20:41
the studies that are happening is that
20:44
are watching on television is going to be
20:46
little guy because every time the
20:47
rapist catches a child i think he
20:50
is the instrument is the rapist
20:53
because that is the truth
8:56 PM
is he an instrument or is he the
8:58 pm
rapist
8:59 pm
so you think about it when we
21:02
have a son who even a grandson wants to know that
21:05
this youth there I wonder what
21:08
and when I see a girl he calls
21:10
imperative is 3 or 4 years old I
21:12
I look at the girl, we already know the
21:14
symptom I think people until I die of
21:17
pity when I see an autistic because
21:20
I published how many years ago the
21:23
autistic
21:24
they will be elevated they will be
21:27
published everything will revolve around
21:29
autistic
9:30 pm
considered as dolls so
21:33
beautiful has autistic has autistic child
21:35
which is beautiful and this is publication
21:40
praise and analysis
21:42
so is the autistic are extremely
21:46
attractive or attractive to pedophiles and
21:49
when he screams when he reacts when
21:51
he does something is not
21:53
happening to him is because he is autistic, but in fact it is happening is because he is suffering psychotic attacks
21:55
autistic has crisis
21:56
the excuse now is if he has a crisis
9:59 pm
think about what this system can do with
22:02
the autistic child and without raising
22:05
no suspicion
22:06
so it's for everyone it's not just for me it's for
22:11
all for the children I have
22:12
grandchildren I want to have for the children
22:15
that I see my children
22:17
if when i look my heart hurts i
22:20
I feel helpless
22:22
no use that they don't me
22:24
let them get nowhere then
22:26
something has to be done and through
22:29
of these activism and try to see if
22:31
we have a journalist who really does
22:34
citizenship and be a professional
22:35
ethical that the doors open to us
22:38
are talking about it don't need
22:40
no one believe nor applaud nor
22:41
agree but let us talk lets
22:44
we warn the people it's a hug
22:47
you will end up here otherwise it will not work
22:49
to publish the video
PUBLICAÇÃO: NALY DE ARAÚJO LEITE - BRAZIL
