Dear All
Here is some more activism – please participate!
Please send your petition, information and/or torture and abuse case summaries to all these people and organisations below.
Please take your time and work through the whole list – sending them your petitions, information and torture and abuse case summaries.
The aim of our activism is exposure of these crimes and weapons, and judicial and human rights intervention and protection.
Please tell all these organisations that this electronic torture, abuse and experimentation, and organized stalking, is a crime against humanity and that we need their humanitarian and legal assistance urgently.
The more petitions, information and torture and abuse case summaries they receive the better.
Please use all the email addresses so that they all know about us.
UN SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON TORTURE MR JUAN MENDEZ
jmendez@wcl.american.edu, sselg@ohchr.org,
HEAD INVESTIGATOR AT U.N – Mr Anand Grover
anandgrover@gmail.com,
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT COMMITTEE ON CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS
LIBE-secretariat@europarl.europa.eu,
JOURNALISTS AND ACTIVISTS CONNECTED TO EDWARD SNOWDEN
angler@rushpost.com,ewen.macaskill@theguardian.com,glenn.greewald@firstlook.org,laura.poitras@firstlook.org,jeremy.scahill@firstlook.org,Marcy.Wheeler@firstlook.org,dan.froomkin@firstlook.org,ryan.gallagher@firstlook.org,murtaza.hussain@firstlook.org,micah.lee@firstlook.org,sstanford@beforeitsnews.com,qjrpress@gmail.com,jim.gottstein@psychrights.org,peter.maass@firstlook.org,ryan.devereaux@firstlook.org,jwadham@interights.org,organisers@stopwatching.us,lschreiber@cair.com,ihooper@cair.com,info@codepink.org,team@fightforthefuture.org,organizing@restorethefourth.net,caaaron@freepress.net,action@eff.org,pk@publicknowledge.org,cduan@publicknowledge.org,mgriffin@publicknowledge.com,mark@cdt.org,info@demandprogress.org,timbl@w3.org,grant_gross@idg.com,juha@saaarinen.org,alexabdo@dcaclu.org,michellerichardson@dcaclu.org,hina.shamsi@law.columbia.edu,ceo@constitutioncentre.org,glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com,qjrpress@gmail.com, info@whistleblower.org,glenn.greenwald@riseup.net,mraross1@outlook.com,investigations@icij.org,
USA GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT
beatricee@whistleblower.org, kathleenm@whistleblower.org, jesselynr@whistleblower.org, info@whistleblower.org,dylanb@whistleblower.org, louisc@whistleblower.org, richardc@whistleblower.org, sarahd@whistleblower.org, jackd@whistleblower.org shannad@whistleblower.org , tomd@whistleblower.org, AlyssaD@whistleblower.org, alisong@whistleblower.org, danag@whistleblower.org, kareng@whistleblower.org, amandah@whistleblower.org, douglask@whistleblower.org, basilK@whistleblower.org, elizabethl@whistleblower.org, michaelt@whistleblower.org,
PSYCHOLOGISTS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
tlong@psysr.org, info@psysr.org,
THE COALITION FOR AN ETHICAL PSYCHOLOGY
ssoldz@ethicalpsychology.org, sreisner@ethicalpsychology.org, bolson@ethicalpsychology.org, jmarrigo@ethicalpsychology.org, bwelch@ethicalpsychology.org, reidelson@ethicalpsychology.org, tbond@ethicalpsychology.org, coalitionfep@ethicalpsychology.org,
7TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON NON-LETHAL WEAPONS
http://www.non-lethal-weapons.com/index.html
conference@ict.fraunhofer.de, m.annati@marina.difesa.it, helmut.oppenheim@bmlv.gv.at, Christian.DeCock@mil.be, david.humair@armasuisse.ch, bezdek.m@vtupv.cz, jochen.neutz@ict.fraunhofer.de, ilkka.hoysti@poliisi.fi, willy.lamal@dga.defense.gouv.fr, paolo.giannetti@marina.difesa.it, igor.plaksin@dem.uc.pt, pascal.paulissen@tno.nl, vicsel@list.ru, sofia.hedenstierna@foi.se, EWGNLW@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk, martina.mandt@ict.fraunhofer.de, hans.ebeling@ict.fraunhofer.de,
EUROPEAN CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS
info@ecchr.eu, info@publicinterestlawyers.co.uk,Paul.McNab@publicinterestlawyers.co.uk,
THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE
staff@rutherford.org, nisha@rutherford.org, internships@rutherford.org,
PLEASE FOLLOW THIS LINK AND SEND PRESIDENT OBAMA AND CONGRESS A LETTER
Tell Congress to STOP! Directed energy weapon attacks, covert surveillance, organized stalking and orchestrated harassment.
Send Letters to President Obama and Congress : 172 Letters Sent So Far
http://govharass.rallycongress.com/2367/tell-congress-to-stop-direc...
ANTI TORTURE ORGANISATIONS
omct@omct.org, omcteurope@omct.org, gr@omct.org, apt@apt.ch, cptdoc@coe.int, saa@fiacat.org, g.colin@fiacat.org, n.jeannin@fiacat.org, ir@interights.org, irct@irct.org, hdr@irct.eu, akj@irct.org, newsroom@presstv.ir, info@presstv.ir, intrelations@presstv.ir, bordc@mail.democracyinaction.org, info@bordc.org, organizing@bordc.org, a.amigo@dcaf.ch, acoomber@interights.org, if@irct.org, eb@irct.org, ats@irct.org, rericsson@apt.ch; eva@redress.org; daniele.perissi@trial.ch; l.grassy@fiacat.org; n.huet@fiacat.org, n.crottaz@alkarama.org; sb@omct.org, omct@omct.org, consultas@cels.org.ar, theo@redress.org, gaelle@redress.org, carla@redress.org, sarah@redress.org, mariana@redress.org, Dadimos@redress.org, makuta@redress.org, kevin@redress.org, lutz@redress.org, tara@redress.org, Letizia@redress.org, gaia@redress.org, eva@redress.org, juergen@redress.org, michelle@redress.org,
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL
amnestyis@amnesty.org; info@amnistia.cl; admin-us@aiusa.org; oficina@amnistia.org.uy; info@amnesty.org.uk; secretariat@amnesty.tw; info@madrid.es.amnesty.org;aiportugal@amnistia-internacional.pt; amnesty@amnesty.org.pl; ai-info@py.amnesty.org; info@amnesty.org.nz; nireland@amnesty.org.uk; supporter@amnesty.org.au; contacto@amnesty.org.ar; amnesty@amnesty.is; info@amnesty.ie; info@amnestyghana.org; admin-fr@amnesty.asso.fr; amnesty@amnesty.dk; info@amnesty.de; admin@amnesty.hr; amnesty@amnesty.cz;info@amnesty.ch; aibf@aibf.be; aibda@ibl.bm; info@amnesty.at; aibf@aibf.be; amnesty@amnesty.nl, IEC@amnesty.org, secgen@amnesty.org, irene.khan@amnesty.org, ibyrne@amnesty.org, ESCR@amnesty.org, amnesty.info@amnesty.de, Klara.Schneiderova@amnesty.cz, jana.vargovcikova@amnesty.cz, secretariat@amnesty.tw, info@amnesty.tw, supporter@amnesty.org.au,
THE ACLU – THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERIRES UNION
executive_director@aclu.org, media@dcaclu.org, action@aclu.org, ssoutar@acluct.org,acluofillinois@aclu-il.org, aclu@aclu-md.org, info@aclu-mass.org, support@aclu-mn.org, info@aclu-nj.org, wro@nyclubuffalo.org, info@gvclu.org, info@aclupa.org, info@acluvt.org, acluva@acluva.org, , tnelson@aclu-mn.org,ACLUOnline@aclu.org, acluva@acluva.org, info@mclu.org, info@aclupa.org, aclunc@nc.rr.com, info@aclusouthcarolina.org, info@acluga.org, aclufl@aclufl.org, aclupr@prtc.net, contact@acluohio.org, mail@acluwv.org, info@acluvt.org, info@aclu-ky.org, aclutn@aclu-tn.org, info@aclualabama.org, office@aclu-ms.org, acluofillinois@aclu-il.org, aclu@aclumich.org, liberty@aclu-wi.org, info@aclukswmo.org, legal@aclukswmo.org, info@aclu-ia.org, support@aclu-mn.org, southdakota@aclu.org, info@aclunebraska.org, acluok@acluok.org, info@aclutx.org, info@aclu-co.org, acluwy@aclu.org, aclu@aclumontana.org, admin@acluidaho.org, aclu@acluutah.org, aclunv@aclunv.org, info@aclusandiego.org, akclu@akclu.org, office@acluhawaii.org, info@aclum.org, riaclu@riaclu.org, info@acluct.org, info@aclu-nj.org, aclu@aclu-de.org, aclu@aclu-md.org, jcarnig@nyclu.org, mtrimble@nyclu.org, cnyintake@nyclu.org, geneseevalley@nyclu.org, suffolk@nyclu.org, westernregion@nyclu.org, msilver2@att.net, intake@aclu-co.org, smeswarb@aclu-co.org, jkrieger@aclu-co.org, jcurr@nyclu.org, dberger@nyclu.org, mmiller@aclu-mn.org, ibratlie@aclu-mn.org, info@aclu-or.org, Volunteer@aclu-or.org, jkooren@aclu-mn.org, jcurr@nyclu.org, msilverstein@aclu-co.org, aclu@aclu.org, JDauteuil@aclusandiego.org, assistance@aclufl.org, lalexander@nyclu.org, rtwallace@aclu-co.org, srich@aclu-co.org, smeswarb@aclu-co.org, cstoddart@aclu-mn.org, jcarnig@nyclu.org,
THE AUSTRALIAN GREENS
greens@greens.org.au, senator.milne@aph.gov.au, senator.ludlam@aph.gov.au, adam.bandt.mp@aph.gov.au, senator.siewert@aph.gov.au, senator.hanson-young@aph.gov.au, senator.dinatale@aph.gov.au, senator.wright@aph.gov.au, Lisa.Marlin@aph.gov.au, senator.waters@aph.gov.au, senator.rhiannon@aph.gov.au, senator.whish-wilson@aph.gov.au, senator.xenophon@aph.gov.au,
THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD - NLG
president@nlg.org, legalworkervp@nlg.org, nvp3@nlg.org, traci@nlg.org, snvp@nlg.org, evp1@nlg.org, southernrvp@nlg.org, midwestRVP@nlg.org, northwestrvp@nlg.org, midatlanticrvp@nlg.org, mideastrvp@nlg.org, northeastrvp@nlg.org, farwestrvp@nlg.org, northwestrvp@nlg.org, southwestrvp@nlg.org, texomarvp@nlg.org, mideastrvp@nlg.org, midatlanticrvp@nlg.org, abi@nlg.org, membership@nlg.org, tupocc@gmail.com, nextgen@nlg.org, queercaucus@nlg.org, mvh@justiceonline.org, antiracism@nlg.org, antisexism@nlg.org, director.npap@nlg.org, director@nlg.org, communications@nlg.org,
THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION – ABA
irr@americanbar.org, tanya.terrell@americanbar.org, Patrice.payne@americanbar.org, Michael.pates@americanbar.org, sarah.turberville@americanbar.org, Jaime.campbell@americanbar.org,Katherine.incantalupo@americanbar.org,Leanne.Pfautz@americanbar.org, Julie.Pasatiempo@americanbar.org, Angela.Benson@americanbar.org, Audrey.Lamb@americanbar.org, Jessica.Smith@americanbar.org, Christina.Heid@americanbar.org, Curry.Wilson@americanbar.org, Thomas.Happell@americanbar.org, Adam.Vogel@americanbar.org, Jacqueline.Gichinga@americanbar.org, Michelle.Mattingly@americanbar.org, gpsld@americanbar.org , service@americanbar.org, Dawn.Holiday@americanbar.org, christianna.tucker@americanbar.org, humanrights@americanbar.org, silcomtech@americanbar.org, jill.pena@americanbar.org, tina.guedea@americanbar.org, teresa.ucok@americanbar.org, introl@americanbar.org, Will.Hornsby@americanbar.org,
FAMOUS HUMAN RIGHTS LEADERS
info@tutu.org,nomfundo@tutu.org ,info@tutufoundation-usa.org , pilgereditor@gmail.com, chomsky@mit.edu,admin@chomsky.info,david@mediachannel.org, editor@medialens.org, mail@robert-fisk.com, emailbox@robert-fisk.com, info@mind.org.uk, info@torturecare.org.uk, feedback@humanrightsfirst.org, hri@hri.ca, BurnsC@humanrightsfirst.org, info@savethechildren.it, carterweb@emory.edu, tony.clark@nara.gov, kolb@ihf-hr.org, ldh@ldh-france.org, hommes.libertes@ldh-france.org, communication@ldh-france.org, administration@ldh-france.org, adherer@ldh-france.org, fuentes@dipol.gov.co, cooperantes@cgfm.mil.co, vleone@soaw.org, info@dcaf.ch, Center4justice@cja.org, info@ecchr.eu, mthomson@apt.ch, apt@apt.ch, a.amigo@dcaf.ch, contact@councilforthenationalinterest.org, national@washpost.com, heather@wrfg.org, sharonweinberger@gmail.com, Hillary.Viers@bioethics.gov, lklucy@att.net, alli@codepink.org; laura.codepink@gmail.com, frackturedprune@gmail.com, Sam.codepink@gmail.com, hannah.codepink@gmail.com, maggie.codepink@gmail.com,bordc@mail.democracyinaction.org, info@bordc.org, organizing@bordc.org, crcl@dhs.gov,rhester@ucsusa.org , ucsaction@ucsusa.org, pphartiyal@ucsusa.org,
THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS
rhester@ucsusa.org , ucsaction@ucsusa.org, pphartiyal@ucsusa.org,
THE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION OF JURISTS
info@icj.org, olivier.vanbogaert@icj.org,chancellor@scu.edu.au, ekonstan@techno-link.com, izurieta@ecuafast.com, sigi@nests.com.jo, info@icj-kenya.org, kmprdf@mail.com.np, jwa@binghodneland.no, post@icj.no, info@icj-ch.org, odhikar@citech-bd.com, bhrc.nhq@gmail.com, bar@caribsurf.com, mbdhp@fasonet.bf, etude.alhassan@intnet.td, ccj@col.net.co, info@ylbhi.or.id, mary.ann.hedlund@domstol.no, cile@rc.msu.ru, inbox@ip-centre.ru, tbax@ms17.hinet.net, ltdh@tg.refer.org, arlethag@globalrights.org, ielsur@chasque.apc.org, zamlaw@zamnet.zm, zlhr@icon.co.zw, chaskalson@concourt.org.za , dowdj@courts.nsw.gov.au, sekretariat@juristenkommission.at, redaction@gpdoc.com, sektion-ijk@t-online.de, m_ng@hk.super.net, ramdasanand@sify.com, cels@cels.org.ar, office@oliviers.be, paulanthonymcdermott@eircom.net, francovella@tiscalinet.it, jclu@jclu.org, contact@omdh.org, njcm@law.leidenuniv.nl, dallari@originet.com.br, patw@cba.org, advokat@HaStabell.com, hrcp@hrcp-web.org,rchiri@cajpe.org.pe, amp@plmj.pt, ipcentre@mtu-net.ru, info@icj.dk, acijlp@thewayout.net, lovrosturm@siol.net,secretariat@icj-sweden.org, rsmith@justice.org.uk, aaicj@mindspring.com, howen@icj.org,
PLEASE CONTACT US FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:-
Yours in the search for openness and respect for universal human rights
John Finch, 5/8 Kemp St, Thornbury, Vic 3071, Australia, TEL: 0424009627
EMAIL: tijohnfinch@gmail.com,MCmailteam@gmail.com
FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/john.finch.16547?ref=profile
GROUP FORUM: https://peacepink.ning.com/
TARGETED INDIVIDUAL and a member of THE WORLDWIDE CAMPAIGN AGAINST ELECTRONIC TORTURE, ABUSE AND EXPERIMENTATION
All Posts (12235)
Sort by
Article de Mojmir Babacek traduit de l’anglais par Rudy Andria, avec l’autorisation de l’auteur.
L’article décrit les principes techniques de la manipulation à distance du fonctionnement du cerveau humain et la menace pour la démocratie, ce qui implique le maintien au secret de l’existence de telles technologies .
2 July 2014
中国受害者告全世界人民书
An Announcement To The Whole World By Chinese Victims Of Electronic And Psychotronic Weapons
(SEE BELOW FOR CHINESE VERSION)
DEAR SIR/MADAM
First of all, please permit us to introduce ourselves to you. We are some of the Chinese victims from dozens of regions and cities across China , who have been cruelly harassed tortured and persecuted in a covert way by the means of secret remote control on human body & brain. Among us, there are corporate employees, teachers, students, retirees and other intellectual workers and physical workers. Our suffering period ranges from several months till over 30 years.
Thanks to Internet that builds a bridge for us to know each other, and it is same sufferings bring us to work together.
A group of secret criminals who abuse their powers, arbitrarily use “the means of secret remote control on human body & brain”, illegally manipulate our bodies and brains covertly, and also cruelly torture and harass us psychologically and physically and persecute us days and nights so that a lot of victims live a very miserable and horrible life.
Secret criminals utilize the weapons of “secret remote control on human body & brain” and remotely influence us, and consequently our bodies suffer from “physiological diseases and physiological behaviors” caused artificially from their weapons such as aching, itching, coldness, hotness, trembling, unwell feeling and unhappiness, and so that our brains suffer harassments and tortures from “acoasma and hallucination”. Besides, criminals do all they could to shamelessly steal and indecently spread our privacy in our brains in a abnormal psychology and crazily do all they could to intimidate and humiliate victims. All these vices do a great harm us psychologically and physically. Therefore , some innocent victims was forced to hospitals especially for being forced to accept mental treatment, some innocent victims were forced to suicide because of intolerable secret tortures and insults, and others died of “strange fatal diseases” yielded by criminals secretly in a special trap.
Such secret crimes as the wide abuse of their powers, the illegal use of “the means of secret remote control on human body & brain” and illegal violation of fundamental human rights, have resulted horribly in atrocity or the unprecedented anti-human catastrophe of human rights technically. These crimes not only challenge severely Chinese constitution and laws, but also human conscience, the UN Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It is NOT permitted by all the human beings at all!
Owing to the above-mentioned cases, Chinese victims jointly lodged “a collective complaint to Chinese President Hu Jintao” (please see attachment 1) on 3rd Dec. 2007, and emailed it to the Chinese Communist Party Central Committee, every ministries of the State Council, major news media and the legal community who we asked to deliver the complaints to Chinese President.
Subsequently, we jointly announced " An Open Letter to the Head of Chinese Secret Institution" on 5th May 2008.(Please see attachment 2)
Chinese Goverment has the undisputed responsibility to take an immediate investigation into the secret criminals who abuse their power, and to sternly punish them according to the clause of "the State respect and protect citizens' human rights" set out by Constitution of PRC China. However, unfortunately, so far we have not received any response on the issue.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UN General Assembly passed and published Resolution 217A (III) on 10th December 1948) stipulates in the following relevant clauses that:
Article 3 Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.
Article 5 No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Article 6 Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.
Article 12 No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.
Article 19 Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
China is one of the creators of the United Nations, a permanent member of the UN Security Council, a member of UN Human Right Council and one of the signers of UN Covenant on Human Rights. Therefore, China should seriously observe and enforce the relevant rules of UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
At present, the quantity of victims are increasingly rising around the globe. Thousands of victims strongly demand for an investigation into the sinful Hi-tech crimes which covertly violate human rights worldwide. A large quantity of the stated facts reveal that these secret fascist criminals are the common enemies of all the human beings who use Hi-tech means to arbitrarily secretly violate human dignity and fundamental human rights. The crazy secret Hi-tech crimes heavily threat and violate the fundamental rights of human livings in the world.
Challenged by the unprecedented worldwide catastrophe of human rights and the severe crimes of damaging human beings, we urge an immediate actions in union and bravely fight against the gangs of secret fascist criminals! We must disclose the horrible crimes which are covertly damaging human beings, and put them into the Judge Courtroom in International Criminal Court!!
Journalist and elites worldwide have the responsibility to provide supports for victims, the lawyers worldwide have the responsibility to stand by and offer a legal aid to victims.UN Human Right Council has the responsibility to safeguard human rights and to protect thinking right, sleeping right, health right and living right of all the human beings. International Criminal Court at Hague has the responsibility to carry out an investigation into the crimes denounced by victims, and to charge these secret fascist,the criminals who severely violate fundamental human rights with the Hi-tech Crime and the Antihuman Crime through and according to the relevant legal proceedings.
We, Chinese victims, support resolutely the global campaign of " Ban the abuse and torture of secret MIND CONTROL/PSYCHOTRONIC WEAPONS/Remote Human manipulation" through our practical actions. We strongly appeal for the United Nations to immediately stop the abuse of the means of the secret remote control on human body & brain which are used to cruelly harass and torture and persecute covertly common citizens.
We strongly urge the UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to do his solemn duty to protect fundamental human rights of the whole world, and hold a urgent international conference on the ban of abusing “the means of secret remote control on human body & brain" so as to protect the validity of the UN Charter and UN Declaration & Covenant on Human Rights. Also, we demand for European Commission for Human Right to immediately put Article 27 of A40005/1999 into practice.
We strongly urge global news media to stand out to support justice, and to take a deep careful investigation into the secret Hi-tech crimes, and to expose truly the sinful facts of secret fascist criminals to the global people.
We strongly urge global legal community to stand out to offer a legal aid to all the victims and support justice based on the UN Charter and UN Declaration & Covenant on Human Rights.
We strongly urge UN Human Right Council to take an urgent investigation into these secret fascist criminals who arbitrarily use “the means of secret remote control on human body & brain” which have been crazily violating fundamental human rights.
We strongly urge International Criminal Court to take an immediate investigation into our complaints, and to charge these secret fascist criminals who heavily violate fundamental human rights with the Hi-tech Crime and the Antihuman Crime, and to make a historic great contribution to guarantee the fundamental human rights of all the human beings!!
With best regards，
Yours Truly
CHINESE VERSION
尊敬的女士、先生：
我们来自中国各地数十个城市地区，是一些遭受“秘密遥控人体和大脑（精神）技术”武器残酷虐待折磨迫害和阴谋暗害的受害者。我们之中，有公司员工、教师、学生、退休职工，以及其他从事脑力和体力工作的普通平民。我们之中，受害的时间，短的仅几个月，长的则达三十多年。
网络使我们相识，受害的遭遇让我们走到了一起。
长期以来, 一帮滥用特权的秘密罪犯，肆无忌惮地使用“秘密遥控人体和大脑（精神）技术”，非法秘密控制我们的身体和大脑（精神），日夜不停地实施种种惨无人道的精神骚扰和肉体折磨迫害、阴谋暗害，致使许多受害者每天生活在无比痛苦的、生不如死的恐怖状况中。
他们使用“秘密遥控人体和大脑（精神）技术” ，遥控制造我们受害者身体内日夜交替出现：痛、痒、冷、热、颤抖、难受等人为的“生理疾病和生理行为”痛苦；遥控制造我们受害者的大脑（精神）日夜出现所谓的“幻听、幻觉”骚扰折磨痛苦。他们还竭尽无耻、卑鄙、下流的变态伎俩，窃取传播受害者大脑思维的隐私信息，并且，疯狂地对受害者进行秘密恐吓和种种人格侮辱。所有这一切，都给我们受害者的肉体和精神带来了无与伦比的巨大创痛，身心遭到极度的摧残和伤害。其中，有一些无辜受害者被诬陷并送进“精神病院”；另一些因无法忍受秘密折磨凌辱的痛苦而“自杀”；还有一些则被他们秘密制造身体内出现各种莫名其妙的“绝症怪病”而阴谋暗害，含冤死亡。
这样广泛的滥用“特权”，使用“秘密遥控人体（大脑）技术”，非法侵犯普通平民基本人权的秘密犯罪行为，在其技术性、恐怖性和反人类性上都已经成为中国和世界历史上空前的人权浩劫。这不仅是对中国宪法法律的严重挑战，而且，也是对人类良知、对《联合国宪章》和《人权宣言》的严重挑战，是全人类所绝对不能允许的！
为此，我们中国受害者于2007年12月3日，联名写了一封“致胡锦涛主席的集体控诉信” （ 见“附件一” ），并用电子邮件发送给了中共中央和中国国务院各部门，以及全国新闻媒体和法律界人士等，要求转呈给中国国家主席。
接着，在2008年5月5日，又联名发出了一封《致中国“秘密机构”头头的公开信》（ 见“附件二” ）。
毫无疑问，中国政府有责任按照中国宪法载明的：“国家尊重和保障公民人权”等法律条款，立即调查并严惩这帮滥用特权的秘密罪犯。然而，遗憾的是，我们受害者所进行的这些揭露控诉努力，并没有得到应有的重视和回应。
《世界人权宣言》(联合国大会 一九四八年十二月十日 第217A(III)号决议通过并颁布) 的有关条款规定：
第三条|
人人有权享有生命、自由和人身安全。
第五条
任何人不得加以酷刑,或施以残忍的、不人道的或侮辱性的待遇或刑罚。
第六条
人人在任何地方有权被承认在法律前的人格。
第十二条
任何人的私生活、家庭、住宅和通信不得任意干涉,他的荣誉和名誉不得加以攻击。人人有权享受法律保护,以免受这种干涉或攻击。
第十九条
人人有权享有主张和发表意见的自由;此项权利包括持有主张而不受干涉的自由,和通过任何媒介和不论国界寻求、接受和传递消息和思想的自由。
中国是联合国的创始国之一；中国是联合国安理会常任理事国；中国是联合国人权理事会成员；中国也是联合国有关《人权公约》的签署国之一。因此，中国理应严格恪守、认真执行“联合国人权宣言”等有关维护公民人权文件的规定。
现在，世界各国的受害者数量呈现越来越多之势。成千上万的受害者强烈要求对目前正在全世界范围内发生的这一罪大恶极的侵犯人权事件进行调查。从大量揭露出来的事实表明，这些恣意践踏人类尊严和基本人权的秘密法西斯罪犯是全人类的共同敌人。他们这一疯狂的秘密罪恶正在严重威胁和侵犯着全世界人民最基本的生活和生存权利。
面对这一空前的世界性人权浩劫，全世界人民必须紧急行动起来，团结一致，同仇敌忾，与这帮秘密法西斯罪犯进行坚决斗争！认清他们的秘密罪恶面目，揭露他们秘密侵犯、残害人类的滔天罪行，将他们押上国际刑事法庭的审判台！！
全球所有的新闻媒体和有识之士有责任向受害者表示声援支持；世界各国的法律界人士有责任挺身而出，为受害者提供法律援助；联合国人权理事会有责任捍卫人权,维护全人类的思想自由权、睡眠休息权、身体健康权和生命生存权；联合国海牙国际刑事法院有责任接受和调查受害者提起的诉讼，并将这帮严重危害人类基本权利的秘密法西斯罪犯绳之以法！！
我们中国受害者，以自己的实际斗争行动，坚决支持“禁止使用秘密遥控人体（大脑）技术武器”滥施于民的世界性运动；坚决要求联合国制止这一使用“秘密遥控人体（大脑）技术”武器针对普通平民，实施秘密肉体和精神残酷虐待折磨迫害的滔天罪恶。
我们强烈要求联合国秘书长 潘基文 先生从维护“联合国宪章”及有关“人权宣言和公约”的尊严出发，履行自己维护全世界人民基本人权的神圣职责，紧急召开“禁止使用秘密遥控人体（大脑）技术武器”的国际会议。我们要求欧盟人权委员会立即开展其A40005/1999第27款的工作！
我们强烈呼吁世界各国新闻媒体挺身而出，主持正义，对众多的受害事件进行深入认真调查，并真实地向全世界公众揭露曝光这帮秘密法西斯罪犯的罪恶事实真相！
我们强烈呼吁全世界的法律工作者勇敢地站出来，以“联合国宪章”和有关“人权宣言和公约”为依据，对受害者提供法律援助，替所有受害者伸张正义！
我们强烈要求联合国人权理事会，对这种滥用特权，肆无忌惮地使用“秘密遥控人体（大脑）技术”，丧心病狂地侵犯人类最基本人权的秘密法西斯罪恶行为，立即进行紧急国际调查！
我们强烈要求“国际刑事法院”，对受害者的控诉立即立案调查，并依据联合国有关“维护人权”的文件法规，将这帮凶恶的秘密法西斯罪犯押上国际刑事法庭提起公诉，为保障人类的基本人权做出历史性的贡献！
附件（一）：致胡锦涛主席的集体控诉信》
尊敬的胡锦涛主席：
我们是一些被“秘密遥控人体和大脑（精神）技术” 折磨迫害的受害者。网络使我们相识，受害的遭遇让我们走到了一起。
我们集体向您——胡主席进行强烈控诉！！
在现今的中国，有着一帮无法无天的秘密罪犯。
长期以来,他们恣意践踏宪法尊严，非法侵犯中国公民人权，肆无忌惮地使用“秘密遥控人体和大脑（精神）技术”，对受害者的身体和大脑（精神）日夜不停地实施种种秘密控制骚扰，惨无人道的进行折磨迫害和阴谋暗害，致使许多受害者每天生活在极为痛苦恐怖的精神状况中生不如死，身心遭受极度的摧残和伤害。不少受害者因他们制造出的各种莫明其妙的怪病而无辜冤死。
这种秘密“遥控技术手段” 包括：制造我们身体内日夜交替出现：痛、痒、冷、热、颤抖、难受等人为的“生理疾病和生理行为”痛苦；制造我们的大脑（精神）日夜出现被遥控的所谓“幻听、幻觉”的骚扰折磨痛苦。他们还竭尽无耻、卑鄙、下流的变态伎俩，窃取传播受害者大脑思维的隐私信息，并且，疯狂地对受害者进行秘密恐吓和种种人格侮辱。所有这一切，都给受害者的肉体和精神带来了无与伦比的巨大创痛！
由此，造成我们中的许多受害者如今在工作单位受到了极不公正的对待：有的受到严重岐视；有的被剥夺了工作权利，失去了生计。一些受害者向公安司法部门报案时，也被错认为“精神有问题”而不予理睬。同时，也给我们的家庭带来了极其严重的损害,使不少受害者的家庭因此而出现裂痕,甚至造成家破人亡的惨痛后果。
据不完全的网络统计，在我国，现今公开站出来揭露曝光的受害者已有几百人之多。而更多的受害者正在逐步认清这帮秘密罪犯的“庐山真面目”，积极加入到揭露曝光他们罪恶的战斗行列来。
这种无法无天的秘密恐怖犯罪行为的泛滥，正在引发广泛的社会恐慌，给整个社会的稳定与和谐带来严重的破坏。这种伤天害理的秘密恐怖犯罪行为的泛滥，必将对国家、对民族造成巨大的危害！
而这样广泛的滥用“特权”，非法侵犯公民人权的秘密犯罪行为，在其技术性、恐怖性和反人类性上都已经成为中国和世界历史上空前的人权浩劫。毫无疑问，这是对人类良知、对法律的严重挑战，是国家的宪法和法律所绝对不能允许的！
中华人民共和国宪法第三十三条法定：凡具有中华人民共和国国藉的人都是中华人民共和国公民。
中华人民共和国公民在法律面前一律平等。
国家尊重和保障公民人权。
中华人民共和国宪法第三十八条法定：中华人民共和国公民的人格尊严不受侵犯。禁止用任何方法对公民进行侮辱、诽谤和诬告陷害。
中华人民共和国宪法第五条法定：中华人民共和国实行依法治国，建设社会主义法治国家。
国家维护社会主义法制的统一和尊严。
一切法律、行政法规和地方性法规都不得同宪法相抵触。
一切国家机关和武装力量、各政党和各社会团体、各企业事业组织都必须遵守宪法和法律。一切违反宪法和法律的行为，必须予以追究。
任何组织或者个人都不得有超越宪法和法律的特权。
中华人民共和国民法第九十八条法定：公民享有生命健康权。
然而，这帮秘密罪犯，根本无视《宪法》等这些法律条款规定，有恃无恐地凌驾于法律之上，滥用手中掌握的所谓“特权”，丧心病狂地对广大受害者的身体和大脑（精神）进行摧残式的秘密遥控折磨骚扰迫害，恣意蹂躏剥夺受害者的思想自由权、休息睡眠权、身体健康权等公民基本人权；无耻地侵犯侮辱受害者个人所有的隐私和人格尊严……。
我们受害者在他们的日夜秘密控制折磨中倍受煎熬，“唤天天不应，唤地地不灵”。在这种极度痛苦，举目无助情况下，才不得不集体向您投诉控告。敬请胡主席您能体察民苦民愤，为民做主。
据悉，在当今世界上，俄罗斯、美国以及欧盟等许多国家和地区，都不同程度地制订和正在制订一些具体的决议或法规，明确制止这种“秘密遥控人体和大脑（精神）技术武器”对普通平民实施秘密酷刑虐待折磨迫害。如俄罗斯议会的“决议” 就是一例。
（http://www.geocities.com/capecanaveral/campus/2289/webpage.htm）
（http://mindjustice.org/1-02-6.htm）
在此,我们强烈要求国家紧急立法，制订更具体的法律法规，坚决制止这种滥用“秘密遥控人体和大脑（精神）技术”手段，悍然对公民的身体和大脑（精神）实施疯狂骚扰折磨迫害的秘密恐怖犯罪行为！！
这种滥用”特权”的无法无天秘密恐怖罪行,是疯狂的秘密“违反宪法和法律的行为”！我们强烈要求国家从“尊重和保障公民人权”的法律出发, 坚决“必须予以追究”这帮秘密犯罪分子的刑事责任，挖除这些“秘密毒瘤”，将他们绳之以法！为建立一个法治的和谐社会铺平道路！！
此致
敬礼！
受害者：（签名）
中国受害者告全世界人民书
秘密脑控试验—人类生存基本价值被破坏MK-Ultra类秘密试验（脑控试验）常常在试验目标（受害者）不知情或者不同意的情况下进行的。脑控很容易让受害者精神不正常。加拿大巴士杀人案的李伟光就是脑控秘密试验受害者。
脑控常常涉及微小芯片植入到大脑和身体的其它部位,常常用电磁波作为激发的能量，是RFID和晶振技术的充分应用，不需要传统电池。部分只做控制试验的受害者们身体里没有芯片。脑控涉及定向能（Directed Energy），例如X-射线、微波信号和穿墙高能微波。定向能试验的方式非常隐蔽，可能会产生致命的效果。静态造影如MRI和CT可以造假。
Victim几乎都不知道自己是试验目标。一般症状例如，催眠，剥夺正常睡眠，诱导腹泻，诱导分神，产生头痛及其他部位的疼痛，诱导情绪变化等等。受害者往往将异常归结为普通的健康问题，他们常常不认为他们自己是Victim。
各国特工之间往往互相合作。有人在中国成为受害者，在加拿大继续受到试验，那往往就是中加特工在合作脑控。移民很可能成为脑控的几内亚猪。脑控试验不仅从身体上直接打击受害者，而且使用技术手段来破坏一个人的精神心理。脑控常常被用来暗害敌人，并且能杀人于无形，例如杀死主神经和制造癌症，特别是肺癌。
“Lida”技术：脉冲射频发射器，可以导致严重的疲劳和昏睡，或者失眠。可以穿墙瞄准目标发射. LIDA技术在1950年代由苏联发明，后来在各国得到了发展。声音直达大脑（Voice to skull）技术：可以传送说话声和其它声音，直达目标的头部，旁边的人听不到，可以穿过墙壁发射。该技术可以在没有脑控芯片的情况下实现。（该技术的美国军方代号是“V2K”。）
读取和破解脑波：通过高科技脑控激励芯片（或特定的帽子）来读取受害者的脑波，通过无线传输到附近的接收设备。再过滤出特定的波形来破解受害者的思维和记忆。这项技术已经非常先进。
意念传输：（Thoughts Transmission） 通过无线传输特定的脑控波曲线到受害者的大脑，实现意念的传输，一般需要有脑控微芯片植入在受害者的大脑。意念传输也叫潜意识(subliminal)传输，例如“受辱感”，能破坏人际关系。默念传输：（Subvocal Transmission） 通过电磁波传输来影响受害者的说话器官和抑制思维器官，来影响受害者说话。这种话不经过大脑的思考说出，特别细心的受害者能够发现。这种传输可以通过脑控激励芯片（又叫脑控钉）或不用脑控激励芯片进行。受害者的主要特点是说话不经过思考或者说错话。武器化的微波技术：可以导致一系列的身体的伤害反应，可以悄悄地，穿过墙壁进行。穿墙雷达扫描技术（例如机场安检。）高级无线计算机控制技术：通过探测主板的特定的电磁辐射和向特定的线路端子发射X波段电磁脉冲，实现输出和输入。相当于别人的计算机通过串口连到了你的计算机。在没有无线网卡的情况下就能够实现无线遥控计算机。潜意识“无声的声音”（Subliminal “Silent Sound”） 设备：可以传送催眠式建议到受害者，但受害者耳朵听不到，声波的频率介于超声波和人可听声波之间。
（二）受害者们总结的常见的身体症状和经验：(在读取和破解脑波阶段，受害者们通常没有严重的症状，但是他们至少有一颗芯片在身体里面，部分只做控制试验的受害者们身体里没有芯片。)• 头皮发麻。头晕， 头痛。
• 无理由的极度疲劳，腿肌及关节的酸痛。
• 梦境制造和操纵，剥夺睡眠。
• 电击感以及肌肉的振动和抽动。
• 不通过思考的说话 (subvocal transmission),语言能力受到影响，经常结结巴巴。
• 没有道理的出现心跳过速和过缓。• 记忆力减退，记忆消失 。
• 强迫肌肉收缩和舒张，由调制神经信号所引起，会导致身体和四肢移动。/模拟脑波产生情绪突变。
• 烧灼皮肤，身体的不同部位出现烧灼感或出现不明切口。
• 脸色变暗，头发变稀。 （与信号发射有关）• 与声音交谈，听见声音（Voice to skull, 美国军方代号V2K。）
•不能集中注意力。/眼睛发花。
• 物体振动，如门、窗户、床和椅子（由声波脉冲或芯片模拟所引起。）。• 电子产品的被控制现象，包括计算机、电视机、汽车和家用电器。（例如电视机自动打开或关闭，由电磁脉冲波所引起）
中国受害者签名：
With best regards，
Yours Truly
南京 忻中庆 13776686557 zwt762000@yahoo.com.cn http://blog.sina.com.cn/xdj88
云南 王荣海 15008719951 baiyun024@vip.qq.com
湖南 李春泽 13435768567 myinno@126.com
丹东 高晓维 13898510756 cwzpp@yahoo.cn
上海 郁荣建 13120847702 ayeeyo1226669043@yahoo.com.cn
襄樊 喻峰 13995768279 yunfan201@sina.com
桂林 易胜林 13978302663 yfsb987@sina.com
北京 张蕾 13691103510 zlvever@yahoo.cn
湖北 刘炜 13597878369 liuw71@163.com
上海 余灵波 13321981271 lingbo-yu@163.com
山东 祁昌玲 15154602071 635602318@qq.com
广州 蒋进 13535358871 65141399@qq.com
湖南 郭汝泉 15974413876 guoruquan163@yahoo.com.cn
江苏 孙玮 13917698052 108322515@QQ.com
四川 郑芸 13559949568 854195278@qq.com
浙江 曹世杰 0576-86814070 847654242@qq.com
福建 甘志恒 （0596）2302076 gzhxwq.xwqgzh@yahoo.com.cn
辽宁 石宇 0410-2828530 minamijie@163.com
河北 李冠萍 0310-2326981 ligp741212@163.com
郑州 赵枫 13903863768. zfhb369@yahoo.com.cn
湖南 范丽 13646218013 fan0769@yahoo.cn
广西 邱勇进 0778-2565332 qyjcvn@sina.com
珠海 张路 15812708601 jamesroad9@sina.com
烟台 孙波 15064528015 dcxq@tom.com
安庆 周连宏 13685568645 372330036@163.com
江西 赖启星 13712207193 lgs369369@163.com
驻马店 沅元 13525333332 aney0011@yahoo.cn
四川 陈小意 15982732725 babyhl@vip.qq.com
湖北 龙伟 13469765313 longwei_312657421@qq.com
州 裴维传 13033539006 105118758@qq.com
黑龙江 张晓亮 13634601784 928318548@qq.com
南宁 黄鄯兵 843622736@qq.com
Germany Wenxiu Zhou +49 162 7550 955 zhouwenxiu@yahoo.com
荆州 张四海 15927724461 739394881@qq.com.cn
宜昌 王洋 13307203797 972188722@qq.com
秦皇岛 马欣岚 13230383403 yunzhongyu546@163.com
江西 熊璐 0795-7032879/7585069 615806775@qq.com
徐州 白露 13685161290 bailu8585@sina.com
福建 林振 283704958@qq.com
李选忘 tonyqq66@yahoo.cn
昆明 马超 18536361@qq.com
安徽 彭宜杉 13275779355 pys624@126.com
南京 陈世伟 13211355448 329588460@qq.com
上海 刘华茗之 13818051167 274735961@qq.com
湖北 张承柱 13545372812 793556424@qq.com
湖南 朱卓雄 13187326593 514546363@qq.com
贵州 心语 865403168@qq.com
湖北 任丹婷 13872825547 420663268@qq.com
河北 狄曼琦 zheduandechibang2008@yahoo.cn
吉林 王雅清 13894726370 picture_window@hotmail.com
福建 陈媚 0595-87058567 234824602@163.com
辽宁 刘威 13842729284 liuweiruanjian1986@yahoo.com.cn
Nanjing Xin Zhongqing 13776686557 zwt762000@yahoo.com.cn （http://blog.sina.com.cn/xdj88）
Yunnan Wang Ronghai 15008719951 baiyun024@vip.qq.com
Hunan Li Chunze 13435768567 myinno@126.com
Dandong Gao Xiaowei 13898510756 cwzpp@yahoo.cn
Shanghai Yu Rongjian 13120847702 ayeeyo1226669043@yahoo.com.cn
Xiangfan Yu Feng 13995768279 yunfan201@sina.com
Guilin Yi Shenglin 13978302663 yfsb987@sina.com
Beijing Zhang Lei 13691103510 zlvever@yahoo.cn
Hubei Liu Wei 13597878369 liuw71@163.com
Shanghai Yu Lingbo 13321981271 lingbo-yu@163.com
Shandong Qi Changling 15154602071 635602318@qq.com
Guangzhou Jiang Jin 13535358871 65141399@qq.com
Hunan Guo Ruquan 15974413876 guoruquan163@yahoo.com.cn
Jiangsu Sun Wei 13917698052 108322515@QQ.com
Sichuan Zheng Yun 13559949568 854195278@qq.com
Zhejiang Cao Shijie 0576-86814070 847654242@qq.com
Fujian Gan Zhiheng （0596）2302076 gzhxwq.xwqgzh@yahoo.com.cn
Liaoning Shi Yu 0410-2828530 minamijie@163.com
Hebei Li Guanping 0310-2326981 ligp741212@163.com
Zhengzhou Zhao Feng 13903863768 zfhb369@yahoo.com.cn
Hunan Fan Li 13646218013 fan0769@yahoo.cn
Guangxi Qiu Yongjin 0778-2565332 qyjcvn@sina.com
Zhuhai Zhang Lu 15812708601 jamesroad9@sina.com
Yantai Sun Bo 15064528015 dcxq@tom.com
Anqing Zhou Lianhong 13685568645 372330036@163.com
Jiangxi Lai Qixing 13712207193 lgs369369@163.com
Zhumadian Yuan Yuan 13525333332 aney0011@yahoo.cn
Sicuan Chen Xiaoyi 15982732725 babyhl@vip.qq.com
Hubei Long Wei 13469765313 longwei_312657421@qq.com
Xuzhou Pei Weichuan 13033539006 105118758@qq.com
Heilongjiang sky 13634601784 928318548@qq.com
Nanning Huang Shanbing 843622736@qq.com
Germany Wenxiu Zhou +49 162 7550 955 zhouwenxiu@yahoo.com
Jingzhou Zhang Sihai 15927724461 739394881@qq.com.cn
Yichang Wang Yang 13307203797 972188722@qq.com
Qinhuangdao Ma Xinlan 13230383403 yunzhongyu546@163.com
Jiangxi Xiong Lu 0795-7032879/7585069 615806775@qq.com
Xuzhou Bai Lu 13685161290 bailu8585@sina.com
Fujian Lin Zhen 283704958@qq.com
Li Xuanwang tonyqq66@yahoo.cn
Kunming Ma Chao 18536361@qq.com
Anhui Peng Yishan 13275779355 pys624@126.com
Nanjing Chen Shiwei 13211355448 329588460@qq.com
Shanghai Liu Huamingzhi 13818051167 274735961@qq.com
Hubei Zhang Chengzhu 13545372812 793556424@qq.com
Hunan Zhu Zhuoxiong 13187326593 514546363@qq.com
Guizhou Xin Yu 865403168@qq.com
Hubei Ren Danting 13872825547 420663268@qq.com
Hebei Di Manqi zheduandechibang2008@yahoo.cn
Gilin Wang Iacing 13894726370 picture_window@hotmail.com
Liaoning Liu Wei 13842729284 liuweiruanjian1986@yahoo.com.cn
XU, Yan (Hong Kong) Mobile: (+852) 98501119; Office (+852)27666572; Home (+852) 27742824
TSANG, Yuk Lam (Hong Kong) Tel:(+852)****1307
LI, Xiao Na (Beijing) Mobile: (+86)13718204206
YU, Rong Jian (Shanghai) (+86)13120847702 ,
YE, Guo Zhao (Shanghai) Mobile: (+86)13816428606
ZHOU, Xiao Jiang (Shanghai) Mobile: (+86)13564968621
ZHANG, Hong (Shanghai) Mobile: (+86)13818941950
YU, Ling Bo (Shanghai) Mobile: (+86)13321981271
GAO, Xiao Wei (Dandong City, Liaoning Province) Mobile: (+86)13898510756
YU, Xiao Wei (Yunnan Province) Mobile: (+86)13628872885
WANG, Rong Hai (Yunnan Province) Mobile: (+86)15008719951 ,
GAO, Rui Qiang (Inter-Mongolia SAR) Mobile: (+86)15847178974,
XI, Zhong Qing (Nanjing City) Mobile: (+86)13776686557
KE, Jian Cheng (Nanjing City) Mobile: (+86)15850554926
REN, Jun Jun (Nanchang City) Mobile: (+86)13767158887
WANG, Ya Qing (Jilin Province) Mobile: (+86)13894726370
LI, Song Lin (Jilin Province) Mobile: (+86)13064465176
LUO, Qin Jun (Sichuan Province) Tel: (+86)817-2515184
ZHENG,Yun(Sichuan Province) Mobile: (+86)13559949568
JI, Wang (Dalian City, Liaoning Province) Mobile: (+86)15940925971
LI, Chao(Tianjin) Mobile: (+86)13072085730
ZHOU, Lian Hong (Anqing Anhui Province) Mobile: (+86)13685568645
HAN, Bing (Anhui Province) Tel: (+86)559-6534219
ENG,Yi Shan (Anhui Province) Tel: (+86) 13275779355
CHEN, Da Song(Anhui Province) Tel: (+86)563-2210350
WANG, Wei Kang (Anhui Province) Mobile: (+86)13067635771
WANG, Yang(Yichang City, Hubei Province) Mobile: (+86)13307203797
QI, Chang Ling (Shandong Province)Tel: (+86)546-8597279 ,
GU, Lu Lu (Guangdong Province) Mobile: (+86)13268018561
PENG, Xu (Guangdong Province) Mobile: (+86)13533298544
GUANG, Yu You (Guangdong Province)Tel: (+86)768-2252948
LUO, Jian Bo (Guangdong Province) Mobile: (+86)13226449087
JIANG, Jin (Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province) Mobile: (+86) 13535358871
QIU, Yong Jin (Guangxi Province) ****2565332
PEI, Wei Chuan (Xuzhou City, Jiangsu Province) Mobile: (+86)13033539006
PENG, Jin(Chengdu City, Sichuan Province) Mobile: (+86)13568819725; ?
CHENG, Guang Hui (Xinjiang Province) Tel: (+86) 997-4960621
LOU, Yan Hang (Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province) Tel: (+86)469 5628422 ,
LUO, Xiao Bo (Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province) Mobile: (+86)13906527643 ,
CAO, Shi Jie (Zhejiang Province) Tel: (+86)576-86814070
YI, Sheng Lin (Guiling City, Guangxi Province) Mobile: (+86)13978302663
SUN, Wei (Jiangsu Province) Mobile: (+86)13917698052 ,
XIONG, Lu (Jiangxi Province)Tel: (+86) 795-7032879/7585069,
LI, Guan Ping (Hebei Province)Tel: (+86)310-2326981
CAI, Ya Li (Hebei Province)Tel: (+86)3118650280
INFORMATION IN CHINESE
粉红和平 - CHINA – PEACEPINK
WEB: https://peacepink.ning.com/ http://groups.google.com/group/soleilmavis (IN CHINESE)
Welcome to join 欢迎加入 https://peacepink.ning.com/
Here is a group for members who speak Chinese
以下是一个专门为说中文的受害者设的讨论组
https://peacepink.ning.com/group/chinese
受害博客
http://guopeixi167.blog.163.com/ http://mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/wixngpynodinb
CHINA – MINDCONTROL http://worldvictimsofstalkingsupportunion.webs.com/ http://mindcontrol.com.cn/ http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/2769498521
鉴于精神侵害技术的现实存在亟需新的精神疾病诊断标准 http://user.99114.com/225990/Cooperate_643954.html
PLEASE CONTACT US FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:-
Yours in the search for openness and respect for universal human rights
John Finch, 5/8 Kemp St, Thornbury, Vic 3071, Australia, TEL: 0424009627
EMAIL: tijohnfinch@gmail.com,MCmailteam@gmail.com
FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/john.finch.16547?ref=profile
TARGETED INDIVIDUALand a member of THE WORLDWIDE CAMPAIGN AGAINST ELECTRONIC TORTURE, ABUSE AND EXPERIMENTATION
Réflexions sur l'utilisation des armes non létales (létale)
Magg. CC ISSMI Rosario Château t.
Grand château de carabiniers de Rosario Titre de chef d'état-major mixte Institut (t. ISSMI) et ses réflexions sur l'utilisation des armes non létales (létale)
1. introduction
Lorsque deux mille ans, Sun Tzu, ont déclaré que pour anéantir l'ennemi n'était pas nécessaires de le détruire physiquement, mais en anéantir la volonté de gagner, peut-être même pas imaginé la possibilité d'utiliser une arme non létale. Le fait est qu'aujourd'hui, avec la mise en place progressive des opérations autres que la guerre (opérations militaires autres que la guerre) comme moyen de résolution des crises internationales, l'utilisation d'armes létales dites est d'avoir un moment de réflexion. Il est entendu que, pour atteindre l'objectif juste convaincre l'autre partie aille plier sans nécessairement détruire ses forces, à l'aide des méthodes diplomatiques ou des armes non létales ou invalidantes (létales) et la nécessité pour les chefs militaires et responsables pour faire avancer ce genre d'armes non létales dites provient essentiellement de deux facteurs: -l'absence de l'opinion publique internationale, qui contribue à la « Guerre de Cnn », à tolérer les victimes à la fois chez les hommes de leurs contingents et entre civils de la population locale ; -la nécessité de résoudre le dilemme de choisir entre l'utilisation de la force armée et l'inaction face à une menace, le dilemme dans lequel ils se sentent plus en plus pris au piège des militaires des armées occidentales modernes au cours des missions de maintien de la paix internationale, freinées, entre autres, par les règles d'engagement extrêmement restrictives. À ce stade, les questions se posent : quelle est la valeur technologique de ces instruments . Quels sont les avantages et les inconvénients liés à leur utilisation ? Quel est l'impact de ces ressources sur la tâche de planification pour une opération de paix (PSO) ? Dans les paragraphes qui suivent, les arguments sont recueillies en réponse à ces questions, afin de fournir une vue d'ensemble du sujet avec une référence particulière à l'OSP (Peace Support Opérations) et à la protection de l'ordre public.
2. Non-léthales armes :
la technique, l'applicabilité, les avantages et les inconvénients avant de plonger dans la discussion, il est jugé approprié de donner une définition d'arme non létale ».La meilleure façon est d'utiliser une approche fonctionnelle, en identifiant notamment le caractère définitif. Ces armes sont celles explicitement conçues et utilisées dans le but primaire de désactiver les gens, les moyens et les matériaux, faisant au moins une chance de leur causer des dommages. Ce qui importe, en d'autres termes, vous réduisez les dégâts infligés à la partie adverse, tout en atteignant des objectifs militaires et politiques. À cet effet, il existe ce que nombreuses définitions ont été formulées. Considérant leur importance presque égale, ne mentionne pas un en particulier, mais toutes ces collections seront présentées (voir annexe A). Pour être complet, il estime utiles de mentionner qu'aussi le débat a surgi entre les partisans de la terminologie « létal weapon » et pas ceux en faveur de l'expression "moins de létal weapon". Les arguments en faveur de tous les deux de l'autre thèse conduiraient loin. Par souci de concision, nous supposons pour faire face à des armes non létales par le terme « neutraliser les armes ». Ce qu'on croit que l'adjectif se trouve est ce que la plupart des autres expriment de manière efficace l'usage de ces armes, temps d'empêcher le bon fonctionnement des médias et la mobilité des hommes, en limitant au maximum, sans pour autant exclure deux dommages collatéraux ; le terme apparaît également totalement inapte encombré par une fausse idée de « bonnes armes » en mesure d'éviter toujours et en vertu de toute effusion de sang inutile de conditions et de la destruction.
a.Technologie.
Investissements dans le domaine de la recherche et de développement technologique, mis en œuvre principalement par les pays de l'OTAN au cours de la période de la guerre froide, ont produit des résultats significatifs qui, aujourd'hui, peuvent être exploités industriellement, tant sur le plan technologique pour la désactivation des armes. Les techniques utilisées sont essentiellement basées sur l'électronique/optoélectronique, chimique ou biologique, acoustique, mécanique et médicale. La maturité de ces disciplines est capable de produire une grande variété de produits qui donnent lieu à des effets neutralisants contre des ressources, des personnes et des matières. Pour ce qui précède, désactivation des armes peut être divisée en cinq zones principales technologies : zone de - opto - électronique : cette catégorie comprend les lasers multi spectrales de fumée, faible consommation d'énergie, des impulsions électromagnétiques non nucléaires provoquent la modification des circuits logiques et le contenu de la mémoire de l'ordinateur. Concernant le débat d'armes laser aveuglantes s'ils peuvent être considérés comme des armes non létales, car on prétend qu'ils ont de fortes chances d'infliger des dommages permanents particulièrement inhumaines. -zone acoustique : cette catégorie comprend les générateurs ultrasoniques, c'est-à-dire doux sons fréquence que si dirigée contre une personne cause désorientation, le vomissement, l'etc. ; -domaine chimique et bactériologique : il s'agit d'une catégorie très vaste qui comprend les agents sédatifs, des agents biologiques et antiadhérents supercolle. Il y a les mousses, le Super-Caustici et la modification des techniques de combustion. Paradoxalement, bien que conçut pour réduire les souffrances et le nombre de décès, plusieurs de ces techniques sont susceptibles de tomber dans les catégories qui sont interdites par la Convention sur l'interdiction des armes chimiques ou pour l'interdiction des armes bactériologiques; par exemple, l'utilisation de supercolle, qui ont été fournies aux troupes américaines en Somalie, pourrait être limitée, car l'un de leurs produits chimiques serait interdits de certains accords internationaux pour la protection de l'environnement ratifiés par les États-Unis ; -informatique : virus informatiques sont le seul type de désactivation d'arme qui tombe dans cette catégorie et qui visent à endommager définitivement ou temporairement pour un système informatique. Ils sont extrêmement efficaces comme s'unissent pour une capacité de pénétration élevée et les réseaux dans les systèmes de l'adversaire, un haut degré d'anonymat ; en d'autres termes, il est difficile d'attribuer la responsabilité de cet attentat, parce que pour reprendre à voir un seul hacher, une organisation ou un État ; -Zone kinetic : cette catégorie comprend l'ensemble de la désactivation des techniques basés sur l'énergie cinétique (l'impact). Les exemples incluent les balles en caoutchouc (balle en caoutchouc) ou bois, les canons à eau (Canon à eau), grenades du type spongieux, lancé par des lance-grenades classiques et formé d'une balle en plastique à haute densité, qui est le matériau spongieux capable d'amortir le choc. Malgré n'étant pas ne par un secteur de haute technologie, ont eu beaucoup d'applications et développements dans ce domaine, bien que l'expérience montre malheureusement que ces techniques ne restent pas toujours sous le seuil létal (l'un des facteurs de risque plus importants pour la distance de l'individu touché par ceux qui tirent).
b. Applicabilité.
Dans la conduite des impératifs politiques, PSO qui sont dominants, et qui doivent traduire dans les cibles militaires cohérentes, les deux planifications et influer sur le déroulement de ces opérations. Cela est démontré par le fait que, dans telles tactiques d'opérations des événements importants, tels que le meurtre accidentel de civils, peut remettre en cause la poursuite de la mission. Que les de pourquoi vous vous sentez un fort besoin de développer et puis employer, une catégorie d'armes capables d'action dissuasives, évitant le recours à l'utilisation de systèmes d'armes traditionnelles réputées, à l'occasion, non-membres afin que la létalité et impact psychologique. En plus d'assurer la sécurité de ses hommes besoin d'une doctrine et technologies extrêmement flexibles. En ce sens les armes neutralisantes peuvent avoir un rôle fondamental en se faisant une « réponse graduée » comme pour répondre au besoin de l'intervention armée de la dose et ont un moyen de dissuasion souple capable de prévenir la menace vous jetez directement à l'usage de la force meurtrière. L'un des principaux problèmes opérationnels, comme chacun sait, est apparu dans le cadre du PSO, est de prendre le contrôle des manifestations plus ou moins spontanées, dans lequel des civils non armés, armés des éléments s'entremêlent et fauteurs de troubles (ce qu'on appelle « crows contrôle » et « anti-émeute »).
c. Inconvénients et avantages.
Les avantages et les inconvénients de l'utilisation d'incapacitant amour sont nombreux. Dans le présent travail a été limité à citer que ceux jugés plus adhérents aux fins de l'étude en question. (1) les prestations. L'utilisation de neutraliser les armes, dans le cadre de la gamme des utilisations possibles, peut: permettre le respect du principe de proportionnalité et de Conventions juridiques internationales (voir l'annexe B) tant du point de vue humanitaire, depuis les deux socioculturels ; permettre, en particulier dans les conflits de faible intensité, à désarmer, de frustrer, de retarder ou d'empêcher la mobilisation où des actes hostiles de l'adversaire, ce qui rend disponible plus de temps pour les actions diplomatiques ou le déploiement de renforts amis et alliés ; permettre des attaques très sélectives contre les objectifs fixés à proximité d'importants produits non militaires (symboles culturels, religieux et historiens) qui ne doivent pas être endommagés de quelque façon ; accroître la crédibilité des forces de maintien de la paix fournissant des commandants militaires davantage d'options pour la gradation de la réponse sous le seuil de détermination de la létalité ; permettre les soldats ne pas apparaître comme une force d'occupation qui contribue à l'image positive de leur pays et/ou de la coalition internationale envers la population locale, les factions adverses et les opérateurs de l'information ; renforcer la dissuasion, rendant l'adversaire conscient que nos forces militaires peuvent intervenir rapidement et efficacement pour atteindre les objectifs humanitaires ou autres, sans les coûts politiques, Militaires et prohibitifs économiques ; être, généralement, nettement moins cher que des armes létales, due principalement à abaisser les coûts de développement, de production, de logistique et de l'utilisation opérationnelle ; susciter des réactions positives de l'environnement politique, à l'échelle nationale et internationale et de l'opinion publique, en conséquence de moins susceptibles de subir des pertes et dommages aux personnes, les biens ou l'environnement ; pour cela, nous ajoutons le coût mineur de reconstruction d'après-guerre. (2) inconvénients. Les armes non létales: impliquer le danger de prolifération à sa diffusion comme un outil très efficace pour une utilisation interne par les gouvernements ou un moyen pour des activités criminelles ; comporte le risque de provoquer une escalade de la réaction de l'adversaire contre les dégâts modestes et la nuisance de porté de neutraliser les armes ; nécessite une approche doctrinaire et opérationnelle à nouveau dans l'usage de la force ; exiger une formation adéquate pour être correctement et efficacement utilisés seuls ou en combinaison avec des armes mortelles ; exiger l'évaluation de l'impact psychologique et la moralité de leur utilisation comme armes neutralisantes peuvent s'avérer plus « détestable » représailles ou une décimation (pensez par exemple à briser un tympan, en raison de l'utilisation d'armes non létales, qui pourrait être mortel dans un pays tiers) ; nécessitent, en général, des renseignements plus précis, comme bien que plus proche de coordination, de commandement et de contrôle ; respecter les traités et normes nationales et internationales et leur utilisation pourraient ouvrir de toute une série de questions juridiques nouvelles ; pourrait être perçue comme armes de peu d'effet, sauf si elles ont été explicitement et immédiatement efficaces, ou comme une forme de faiblesse, car il ne détruit pas l'adversaire, mais réduire la volonté et la capacité de combat et de la cohésion ; pourrait conduire à la capture de nombreux prisonniers, s'ils sont largement utilisés non seulement dans l'objet PSO mais aussi au sein des conflits conventionnels.
3. l'effet médiatique
Sur la base d'une plus forte ont besoin de notre société, où chaque événement est présenté dans les maisons des citoyens de sens réel, il devient plus en plus difficile pour une armée de soutien des opinions publiques nationale face à la mort ou des blessures, même accidentelle, des innocents. Sans ce soutien, les résultats de la mission, indépendamment du succès militaire, sont en danger. C'est pourquoi les armes sélectives et limitées, le degré de létalité puissent certainement permettre de réduire ce risque très grave en aidant à gagner ceux qui maintenant constituent une dimension fondamentale de toute opération militaire : l'effet CNN. L'effet psychologique est correctement matières utilisables sur une grande échelle de ces nouvelles armes pourrait, par conséquent, être important en taille, surtout si placé à l'intérieur de deux étapes essentielles d'un objet PSO : consensus et la proportionnalité de l'emploi de la force.
4. les possibilités d'utilisation d'armes non létales dans des opérations d'ordre public
La dégénérescence des affrontements de piazza dans des manifestations de toutes sortes d'occasions a mis en évidence les limites d'application de la loi dans la gestion de grands groupes de manifestants violents avec des instruments classiques fournis à la police, n'est plus en mesure de répondre aux exigences modernes de politiques publiques qui reposent sur la nécessité d'éviter la confrontation et d'endommager le moins possible aux gens des outils en identifiant et en isolant les fauteurs de troubles. Même en Italie, les policiers ont traité, dans certains cas, intenses affrontements semblables à ceux qui déjà ont touché des autorités policières aux États-Unis (révolte des quartiers entiers de Los Angeles), en Israël (intifada) et Grande-Bretagne (émeutes raciales et démonstrations en Ulster), ces pays qui ont d'abord été développé la recherche technologique dans le domaine des armes non létales, dont certains, déjà testés, sont adaptés aux tâches de la tenue des foules d'émeutiers. Vous pensez à balles en caoutchouc et des grenades flashbang, aveuglant, bruit-c'est-à-dire alors que nous étudions d'autres outils tels que des adhésifs ou des substances glissantes de bloquer ou de gêner le passage le long des frontières des "zones rouges", canons spéciaux pour lancer contre la plus agressive odeur groupes adhésifs de mousses ou mélanges qui, au contact de l'air, solidifient blocage fauteurs de troubles ou de créer des barrières infranchissables même à une foule en colère si correctement corrigée avec des répulsifs ou irritant.Je suis également étudiant des munitions spéciales chargées en peinture qui en ferait des manifestants facilement reconnaissables comme fauteurs de troubles que pacifiques. Tous ces systèmes sont déjà fournis départements militaires américains expérimentaux et même les ministères d'émeute de nombreuses forces policières en Amérique, alors qu'ils sont développés autres armes non létales, tels que les ultrasons émetteurs sonores avec une fréquence très basse peuvent provoquer des nausées et des étourdissements et puis rendre inoffensifs les agresseurs (utilisés depuis le ' 80 par les Soviétiques pour tenir les curieux des périmètres des bases militaires et des polygones et des Britanniques en Ulster) et armes émettant des impulsions de lumière et de feux à éclats haute intensité (également connu sous le nom de Dream Machine), qui pourraient affecter temporairement la fréquence des ondes cérébrales humaines, causant des étourdissements, de désorientation et de nausées.
5. nature et cadre juridique d'armes non meurtrières neutralisantes
Le premier problème épineux dans l'étude des armes non létales consiste à déterminer si elles relèvent de la catégorie des armes, mais avec des effets spéciaux, ou si elles sont quelque chose de différent. Si elles n'étaient pas des armes conventionnelles, il devrait en effet se demander ce qu'ils sont et quel est leur statut juridique. Selon Alhadeff, est invalidante technologie les deux armes meurtrières ont le même objectif (c'est-à-dire les personnes ou les choses), mais les différentes formes d'efficacité : les premiers ont des effets destructeurs et ont été conçus dans ce but, ce dernier conçu d'affecter autant que possible réversible. Par conséquent, le concept d'arme non létale, que vous devez exclure tout ce qui n'est pas directement face la désactivation n'y est conçu comme tel. Sont exclus les gilets pare-balles et des systèmes de surveillance des domaines tels que les réseaux à satellite, parce qu'ils ont été conçus avec l'intention de causer des dommages à des hommes et des moyens non létaux. Sont également exclus des systèmes d'armes à Low-Tech, comme bois de bâtons ou matraques, "pourquoi pas significatif", ainsi que tous les périphériques liés à la guerre psychologique, électronique et information et les armes létales de précision parce qu'elles ont été conçues dans le but de minimiser les dommages aux personnes ou aux choses. Penché sur la question du point de vue de l'ordre juridique interne, la solution ne peut pas être celui-là : armes non létales sont armes toute Cour. Actuellement, « the effets of criminel Law » sont une arme pour l'application du paragraphe 2 de l'art. Criminal Code 585, dont la cible est l'offense d'une personne physique, et, au paragraphe 3 du même article indique que c'est aussi une arme, un instrument capable d'incriminer de personnes ou de choses qui sont par la loi interdit absolument ports — sans une raison valable. Voici la notion juridique d'armes qui est soumis à la discipline du Code pénal: l'arme non létale, comme un instrument capable de fautif, peut seulement être une arme dans notre tri, donnant le résultat de l'infraction aucune blessure (physiques, un empêchement, un handicap de choses ou personnes) qui sont un désavantage. Depuis lors, arme à la sens conventionnel, bien que non mortelle, doivent être soumis aux mêmes restrictions qui ont régi les armes meurtrières. En matière de droit international, la justification légale pour cédérom "armes non létales", situé dans la base de principes coutumiers des conflits armés (les principes de nécessité militaire, l'humanité et de la proportionnalité entre le préjudice et l'action militaire), en principe des blessures superflues ou nécessaires souffrantes, dans le principe de la discrimination définie. Ces principes sont dérivés, en particulier, les articles. 35, 36, 51 du protocole additionnel à la Convention de Genève du 12 août 1977. Selon l'art. 36, chaque partie contractante est tenue de garantir la légalité de toute arme ou d'autres instruments internationaux, à la lumière des prévisions du même protocole. Art. 35 interdits expressément les « armes » qui provoque des offenses inutiles ou des souffrances inutiles. Il s'agit d'un corollaire à la règle prévu à l'art. 22 de la Hague Convention II du 29 juillet 1899, ratifiée par l'Italie le 4 septembre 1900, pour qui "le droit des belligérants à adopter des formes d'offense envers l'ennemi n'est pas illimité". L'article 51, enfin, interdit les armes qui frappent. C'est une règle fondamentale qui interdit l'action agressive vers des buts qui ne sont pas de nature militaire ou sont des civils et des militaires pour un temps — seulement les civils sans distinction. Toutefois, il estime que la meilleure façon de statuer sur la légalité des armes non létales est d'étudier, de temps à autre, les effets de chaque nouvelle technologie sur les hommes et des moyens.
6. conclusions
La discrimination de l'usage de la force militaire est un facteur essentiel dans la conduite des opérations autres que la guerre, en particulier du PSO. L'influence des facteurs politiques, dominantes dans ce cas que l'autre, implique la nécessité de disposer des ressources et des outils pour aider la taille l'utilisation des forces et atteindre l'état final de la mission tout en minimisant les effets sur l'autre partie et ses propres troupes. Dans ce domaine spécifique de la technique. Il permet, en effet, ont sophistiqué des armes, des effets facilement employables, progressives et réglables. Face, cependant, l'innovation forte et qu'il respecte les besoins de scénarios d'aujourd'hui, il y avait une mentalité pas encore prête à accepter ce type d'évolution. Cela se reflète dans l'absence résultant d'un soutien juridique et réglementaire adéquat qui facilite son utilisation. Enfin, il reste la réponse à la troisième question posée dans l'introduction. Le poids de ces moyens dans l'étape de planification est sans aucun doute remarquable. Dispose où supprimez par impliquer différentes manières d'intérimaire, différent "ligne de conduite" sur lequel le commandant devra décider, de composition différente et l'articulation des forces pour les différentes tâches qui seront confiées. Personne, pas même dans l'industrie, n'est facile de comprendre que plus la disponibilité des ressources, plus la discrétion du commandant dans le choix des lignes d'action. À ce stade, pour donner un sens concret à l'expression, vous pouvez essayer d'imaginer la structure d'un département étant équipé d'armes conventionnelles et des armes non létales. Nous pourrions facilement parler d'équipes ou pelotons dans les entreprises d'exploitation des unités où entreprises même ad hoc composent d'équipes spécialisées sur divers systèmes invalidants.Mais en fait, ce qui est pensé pour être payé, vos tecnicologistico soutient et formation du personnel. En conclusion, compte tenu de la pertinence de ce que Sun Tzu a écrit il y a 2000 ans (1), il est intéressant de signaler la citation suivante: «... » Malgré les nombreux problèmes qu'elles soulèvent, les armes non létales restent le seul instrument capable de donner une efficacité pour effectuer les nouvelles tâches confiées aux forces armées que le PSO est la Reine du moment... "(2).
............ ................. ............
(1)-« la capacité du commandant est de plier les forces ennemies sans n'importe quel combat dans les villes sans prendre d'assalirle, à vaincre l'ennemi sans longues opérations militaires ».
(2)-JAN ALHADEFF, armes non meurtrières neutralisantes, Franco Angeli 1999 collier
Hi I have been a victim of electronic harrassment every since I lived with my ex-boyfriend Charles in 2009 when he had drugged me and put me and implanted the microchip in the leftside of my brain without my consent and when I woke up I felt alot of pain on the leftside of my head so asked him if I should go to the hospital then he said no you probably just bumped your head you will probably be ok. I also have a copy of my 2012 mri of the brain that shows the microchip in the left side of my brain along with copy of my 2008 brain mri photo that shows no microchip in my brain in 2008. I believe that my ex-boyfriend Charles or his mother Lillian paid these people by the names of Mykelle and Mark and that Marks brother also got involved when he would visit them upstairs from me when they used to live there. I also think that Mykelle and Mark's brother still visit the apartment complex where I live at because I see his brothers motorcycle parked across the parking lot from me on a regular basis. I think the reason that my ex-boyfriend Charles or his mother Lillian paid these people kill me in 2012 to try and keep the microchip that was implanted in me without my consent from being found out about. I also believe Mykelle and Mark that used to live at 1504 Steelwood Ln apt 2 Reno,NV had got my next store neighbors involved that live at 1504 Steelwood Ln apt 3 Reno,Nv 89512 when Mykelle and Mark used to live upstairs from me because they needed more help from other people so that they could switch computors to keep it from being found out about while they used cybernetics on me through a microchip in me . My internet was hacked by my nextstore neighbors for two years I did not know I didn't find out about this until my computor screen locked up and I reviewed my netgear logs and noticed that there was a foreign ip addresses that was not mine, so I decided to unplug my modem for awhile and eventually bought a new modem from att that is harder for them to hack. I also no longer make up my own passwords because these people are able to read my thoughts through a microchip code that goes to the microchip in my brain on their computor screen. I think they have put sonic ear on me a hearing device for elderly without my permission this reason that I believe this is I have had popping and pressure in my ears they also send loud voices to my ears I have even recorded them going through my ear on my computor through a microphone. I also wear doc ear plugs and sonic ear plugs to block out the sound waves being sent to my ears 24 hours a day. I also think they have used microwave oven radio frequency waves on me or electronic guns that they have made up either through microwave ovens or some type of electronic device because I feel alot of electricity go through my body it makes me have headaches and I throw up and leaves me feeling weak and dizzy. I have done everything I can do to protect myself I have filled out online police reports and a FBI report on these people and I have also typed out a letter to the City Mayor along with writing to the President of The United States through email and mail and have not recieved a response back from either of these places. There is one good thing going for me I wrote a member of congress Mark Amodei about stop electronic weapons that are being used against me and many others and when he wrote me back I was surprised when he said that he would be glad to represent me and my family members. Other then that so far I have been ignored by doctors who have done nothing but misdiagnose me with having a mental problem, such as bipolar disorder scizophrenia the day after my brother died when I was in depressed about my brother dying from pre-leukemia. Which I know I don't have a mental problem such as bipolar or scizophrenia because I am not a violent person my thoughts don't change back and forth and I have taken a class on medical terminology and I know that scizophrenia is diagnosed at a young age not at the age of 41 when I was misdiagnosed with it. But I guess that it is so easy for the doctor at the mental institute to misdiagnose me with a mental problem because he did not realize that I had just lost my brother and was depressed in 2012 when he diagnosed me and he also didn't know that electronic weapons was being used on by others through a microchip in my body to mind control,torture and kill me. I have also bought a trail gps tracking device to gather more evidence and have caught all the signals that was being sent out from my nextstore neighbors apt at 1504 Steelwood Ln #3 Reno,Nv 89512 into my apartment at 1504 Steelwood Ln apt 1 Reno,Nv 89512 along many others signals that was coming into my apt that I caught on my tracking device coming from other apts. These people need to be stopped that do this to me and others out there with electronic weapons and through microchips that have been placed in our bodys without our consent before it is to late because this is becoming a worldwide problem this is being used not only to kill me but also on woman,men and children out there. I also had a MRI done on my brain at Reno Diagnostic in December 2011 during the mri I got red in the face after I came out of the mri my face and chest was red and that only happens when there is a metal object in the body and the tech made sure there was nothing on me that was metal on the outside of my body or inside to cause that to happen before I went into the mri machine. I would have to say that Renown Hospital here in Reno,Nv has done nothing but lie to me about the microchip that is seen on the mri photo in my brain through the ex-ray and mri department because they told me I had a normal brain mri and ex-ray with not foreign objects seen but I would guess that a microchip is so tiny that it is almost invisible to the human eye unless the mri is blowen up it would be hard to see so I can't really blame them. I know this because I have reviewed the brain mri photos for 2008 and 2012 and I have seen the microchip in my brain on the 2012 mri photo of the brain when I blew the photo up. I have tried to show my own doctor the 2012 mri photo and he told me that it was a airpocket in the skull of my brain on my 2012 mri. So I decided to get a second opinion from my sons wife a certified mri tech while she was visiting my apt I asked her take a look at the mri of my brain for 2012 to see if she could see anything on the mri of my brain then she told me that she seen a foreign object in the leftside of my skull on my 2012 mri photo and that I should have it surgically removed I later reviewed my mri photo of my brain for 2012 and found a photo that looks like there is a microchip in the leftside of my brain. I also bought a RF bug detector for more evidence and took it outside and all the lights lite up on it and when I held it close to me I a video of it by me. I am a woman on disability and I have been diagnosed with enviromental pre-leukemia that could have been caused from the electronic weapons that have been used on me through the microchip along with whatever kind of electronic guns they have used on me through microwave ovens etc. I wanted a second opinion from a doctor that I paid online and he told me that my 2012 mri of the brain done by Renown Medical Center looks like I have frontal antrophoy of the brain but Renown medical Center lied to me failed to tell me that. I have been physically and mentally tortured and sexually raped by these people through this microchip in my brain from a microchip code that they have typed in on their cell phone or computors with internet connection. They have caused me alot of health problems through Physco cybernetics or some other cybernetic programs that they have used on me without my permission through this microchip in the leftside of my brain or skull. Not only have these people ruined my life these people have threatened to kill me, my children and family members. My hope is that these people will be stopped so that they can't do this to other people out there through electronic weapons and microchips, and so that they can't do this to me anymore or to my family members later on. If you can help me in the fight against preventing me and others from being electronically mentally,sexually tortured,gang stalked, and eventually killed off from electronic weapons and microchips this would help me and many others. I also believe that the microchip is the worst thing that the President Obama Of The United States approved because it causes cancers in humans and animals and allows other people to implant the microchip in a persons body without the consent of the other person and this is the reason why I decided to start this petition. I not only started this petition to help me but others out there that go through the same thing. You may ask how do they do that? Not only do these people get paid to kill people through electronic weapons but if a microchip is implanted in a persons body without the persons knowledge all they have to do is send out a signal from a computor or cell phone with a microchip code that they have typed in and that signal automatically sends out a signal to the microchip that is that persons bodys and from then on they can mind control us,read our thoughts, watch us on camera inside and outside our home ,torture us by causing pain throughout our body and rape us by causing orgasms to happen in our bodys as long as they want too through the microchip. They can also steal our Dna to use it for what ever they want to through the microchip implant . Then they eventually kill us by causing us so many health problems through the microchip and electronic weapons that they have used against us just because someone paid them to murder someone. They even make more money off the person they have killed and make it look like nothing happened because they caused health problems to me and everyone else through electronic weapons and microchips that was implanted in me and other, so after the person died it looks like we died from a natural health problem not a microchip because it is so tiny even a autopsy doctor would not even notice it most of the time unless their was evidence from the deceased left behind such as mri photos,abnormal medical records etc. that would prove that the person died from a microchip and electronic weapons that someone used on me and them to kill. They are also able to steal the Identity of the person and any passwords through the microchip that is implanted in me and others because they are able to read our thoughts on a computor and cell phone ,so when they have killed me or other people they can collect what ever is left over in my bank account and other peoples bank accts if they are not closed out along with any insurance policys that was left behind from the deceased person. Simply by creating a fake Id card and using the social security number of the deceased person that they have killed. I need your help to put a stop to electronic weapons and microchips this not only kills people like me and other but it invades in the privacy rights of me and others. If you would please sign my petition it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks,Sincerly Dina Hamby less
go to
http://www.nominet.org.uk/uk-domain-names/about-domain-names/domain-lookup-whois/whois-tool
type in
gangstalking.co.uk
see what u get! :-(
This weird :) message is not intended for members from this site, so dont bother reading it, its for them, those that does this, im not sure if they got earlier today it so ill just post it here :)) Do not delite or censor by moderators, please.
6/26/2014 - GOOD EVENING LADIES AND FAGOTS, HOW ARE YOU DOING? I HAVE LOST YOUR CONTACT, IT HAS BEEN ALMOST A YEAR AND DIDNT EXPECTED IT WILL GET THIS FAR, PLUS SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY IS NON FUNCTIONAL SO I HAD TO WRITE YOU LIKE THIS. YOUR PROJECT HAVE BEEN SAFE AND WELL COVERED SO FAR BUT I THINK ITS TIME TO SHUT IT DOWN AND LEAVE THIS HOUSEHOLD / NEIGHBOURHOOD ALONE, THE OTHERS CONNECTED TO IT AS WELL, QUITE A BIG NUMBER. IT CAUSES TOO MUCH HEADACHES AND VERY BAD NEURAL INTERFERENCE TO EVERYONE, ALSO HAS CAUSED MAJOR PARANOIA, PANIC ATTACKS AND PSYCHOSYS TO MANY PEOPLE, YOU DONT WANT TO MAKE A BIG LIST OF PEOPLE REGISTERED AT THE DOCTORS OFFICE, IT HAS BEEN SEVERAL SO FAR, MANY NAMES CAN BE CONNECTED TO EACH OTHER INCLUDING MEDICAL RECORDS. THEY HAVE FAMILYES AND YOU ARE RUINING THEIR LIFES, IT WENT QUITE FAR SO FAR. WHY WOULD YOU INDUCE PSYCHOSYS TO A FINE CANADIAN WORKING FAMILY MEMBERS TO SPEND MONEY ON DOCTORS AND USELESS MEDICATIONS? MAKE PROFIT ELSE WHERE. ALSO I DONT KNOW WHAT MAKE YOU THINK THAT ITS HARMLES TO PLAY IT ON KIDS, ARE YOU THAT SICK? DEFINTELY NO FUNNY. AND ME, IM DOING VERY FINE, LUCKYLY IM NOT VERY AFECTED BY IT, THANK YOU FOR ALL THE INFO YOU HAVE GIVEN TO ME, IN SAME TIME I HOPE, AND IM QUITE SURE YOU GOT LOADED WITH PLENTY OF CRAP AND I JUST HOPE I OR SOMEONE RELATED TO ME DONT GET REMOTE CANCER OR SOME KING OF LIFE THRETHENING ACCIDENT, BESIDES THE ATTEMPT FOR NEURAL INFLUENCE FROM YOU. YOU CAN TAKE IT TO YOUR HOME AND YOUR FAMILY, YOU WILL HAVE MUCH BETTER FEEDBACK IN REAL TIME, AND HOPEFULLY SUCCESSFULL EXPERIMENT SINCE THIS IS NOT WORKING, YOU ARE DOING SAME SCHEME FOR YEARS AND HAVENT WENT NOWHERE, ARE YOU RETARDED? IM VERY AWARE WHO IM DEALING WITH, YOU WILL SUCCEED IN COVERING IT FOR A WHILE, BUT STILL, DONT UNDERESTIMATE THE TRACEABLE RECORDS, MOST OF THE THINGS TIME WONT ERASE, AND IM NOT TALKING WITH OR ABOUT DELUSIONS. I HOPE I HAVE SPENT LOTS OF YOURS FUNDINGS AND TIME, I TRIED MY BEST. PS: PUT A FINGER IN YOUR ASS TO COMPENSATE AND FEEL BETTER. :))
+ FOR THOSE THAT SPONSOR AND SUPPORT THIS TYPE OF PROJECTS: ITS NOT WHAT YOU THINK IT IS, IT WILL NEVER BE.
Dear All
The Swiss Catholic Church has included a page about mind control on its website – maybe they are in contact with the Red Cross who we’ve been petitioning.
http://kath-zdw.ch/maria/schattenmacht/mindcontrol.html
Please contact them.
Please send your petitions, information and/or torture and abuse case summaries to them.
The more petitions, information and torture and abuse case summaries they receive the better.
SWISS CATHOLIC CHURCH
Hochw. Pfarrer Bernward Maria Weiss
Hochw. Dr. Pfarrer Harald Eder
b.m.weiss@online.de, eder@kath-zdw.ch, info@kath-zdw.ch, kath-mail@gmx.ch,
Also please send these German Bishops send your petitions, information and/or torture and abuse case summaries.
Please tell all these bishops that this electronic torture, abuse and experimentation, and organized stalking, is a crime against humanity and that we need their humanitarian and legal assistance urgently.
The more petitions, information and torture and abuse case summaries they receive the better.
Please use all the email addresses so that they all know about us:-
GERMAN BISHOPS
kirchenpraesident@evlkanh.de, info@ekiba.de, poep@elkb.de, w.huber@ekbo.de,m.vogel@ekbo.de, ips@lk-bs.de, kirchenkanzlei@kirche-bremen.de, Landesbischoefin@evlka.de,Silvia.Mustert@evlka.de, info@ekhn.de, bischof@ekkps.de, bischof@ekkw.de, martin.dutzmann@lippische-landeskirche.de, info@ellm.de, bischofskanzlei-sl@nordelbien.de,bischoefin.jepsen@nordelbien.de,bischofskanzlei-sl@nordelbien.de, info@ev-kirche-oldenburg.de, oeffentlichkeitsreferat@evkirchepfalz.de, landesbischof@ellm.de, pressestelle@pek.de, presse@reformiert.de, pressestelle@ekir.de, bischof@evlks.de, landesbischof@landeskirche-schaumburg-lippe.de, Christoph.Kaehler@ekmd.de, landeskirchenamt@lka.ekvw.de, Landesbischof@dont-want-spam.elk-wue.de, bischofskanzlei@bksl.nordkirche.de,
bistum-aachen@bistum-aachen.de, bischofshaus@bistum-augsburg.de,weihbischof.gruenwald@bistum-augsburg.de,anton.losinger@bistum-augsburg.de, ordinariat@erzbistum-bamberg.de, info@erzbistumberlin.de,weihbischof@erzbistumberlin.de, Bistum-DD.Kanzlei@online.de, BistumEichstaett@t-online.de, rhauke@bistum-erfurt.de, Ordinariat@Bistum-Erfurt.de, Generalvikariat@bistum-essen.de, info@ordinariat-freiburg.de, bgv@bistum-fulda.de, ordinariat@bistum-goerlitz.de, egv@erzbistum-hamburg.de, bischofshaus@bistum-hildesheim.de, presse@erzbistum-koeln.de, ordinariat@bistumlimburg.de, ordinariat@bistum-magdeburg.de, info@bistum-mainz.de, pressestelle@erzbistum-muenchen.de, pressestelle@bistum-muenster.de, bgv@bistum-os.de, generalvikariat@erzbistum-paderborn.de, generalvikariat@bistum-passau.de, info@bistum-regensburg.de, Ordinariat@bo.drs.de, info@bistum-speyer.de, weihbischof.buero-trier@bistum-trier.de,weihbischof.buero-saarbruecken@bistum-trier.de,weihbischof.buero-koblenz@bistum-trier.de,sekretariat.weihbischoefe@bistum-trier.de,biptrier@bgv-trier.de, bischof@bistum-wuerzburg.de,bischofssekretaer@bistum-wuerzburg.de,generalvikariat@bistum-wuerzburg.de,bischof_em@bistum-wuerzburg.de,susanne.wald@bistum-wuerzburg.de, bischofskanzlei@bksl.nordkirche.de, urs.ebenauer@evlks.de, s.weise-mohr@ekbo.de, kirchenkreis@pek.de, kirchenkreisamt@pek.de , Andrea.Verhoeven@evlka.de, Annegret.Kentsch@evlka.de, m.vogel@ekbo.de,
Also have a look at this website:-
htp://whoiselisalam.org/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfqxN5DHFvU&noredirect=1
PLEASE CONTACT US FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:-
Yours in the search for openness and respect for universal human rights
John Finch, 5/8 Kemp St, Thornbury, Vic 3071, Australia, TEL: 0424009627
EMAIL: tijohnfinch@gmail.com,MCmailteam@gmail.com
FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/john.finch.16547?ref=profile
GROUP FORUM: https://peacepink.ning.com/
TARGETED INDIVIDUAL and a member of THE WORLDWIDE CAMPAIGN AGAINST ELECTRONIC TORTURE, ABUSE AND EXPERIMENTATION
I suppose it is time to introduce myself. I am DeepThought, the author behind the wonderful Modern Warfare Series which developed out of the 'Can A Satellite Read Your Thoughts?' series of investigations.
This is a very interesting support group that you guys have here, but I do get the impression that this is a CIA front operation designed to sedate those that are being attacked. This talk of stalkers, TIs, perps and harassment is CIA language used to downplay the seriousness of the situation and feed into neural damage caused by integration with an AI over radio.
What's with all the pink and flowers??? It feels like a mental hospital.
Does that seem harsh? Let's look at this situation objectively, you and your families are under attack and most likely you will die on this program, one way or another. I don't know about the rest of you, but I am from the SAS school of modern combat, I take the fight to people. You should too. Make no mistake about it, you are on the front lines of WWIII. It may not be official yet, but I'm sure you are not stupid.
I've just set up on Twitter, so if you want to chat, just follow me.
A review and update of a controversial 20-year-old theory of consciousness published in Physics of Life Reviews claims that consciousness derives from deeper level, finer scale activities inside brain neurons. The recent discovery of quantum vibrations in "microtubules" inside brain neurons corroborates this theory, according to review authors Stuart Hameroff and Sir Roger Penrose. They suggest that EEG rhythms (brain waves) also derive from deeper level microtubule vibrations, and that from a practical standpoint, treating brain microtubule vibrations could benefit a host of mental, neurological, and cognitive conditions.
The theory, called "orchestrated objective reduction" ('Orch OR'), was first put forward in the mid-1990s by eminent mathematical physicist Sir Roger Penrose, FRS, Mathematical Institute and Wadham College, University of Oxford, and prominent anesthesiologist Stuart Hameroff, MD, Anesthesiology, Psychology and Center for Consciousness Studies, The University of Arizona, Tucson. They suggested that quantum vibrational computations in microtubules were "orchestrated" ("Orch") by synaptic inputs and memory stored in microtubules, and terminated by Penrose "objective reduction" ('OR'), hence "Orch OR." Microtubules are major components of the cell structural skeleton.
Orch OR was harshly criticized from its inception, as the brain was considered too "warm, wet, and noisy" for seemingly delicate quantum processes.. However, evidence has now shown warm quantum coherence in plant photosynthesis, bird brain navigation, our sense of smell, and brain microtubules. The recent discovery of warm temperature quantum vibrations in microtubules inside brain neurons by the research group led by Anirban Bandyopadhyay, PhD, at the National Institute of Material Sciences in Tsukuba, Japan (and now at MIT), corroborates the pair's theory and suggests that EEG rhythms also derive from deeper level microtubule vibrations. In addition, work from the laboratory of Roderick G. Eckenhoff, MD, at the University of Pennsylvania, suggests that anesthesia, which selectively erases consciousness while sparing non-conscious brain activities, acts via microtubules in brain neurons.
"The origin of consciousness reflects our place in the universe, the nature of our existence. Did consciousness evolve from complex computations among brain neurons, as most scientists assert? Or has consciousness, in some sense, been here all along, as spiritual approaches maintain?" ask Hameroff and Penrose in the current review. "This opens a potential Pandora's Box, but our theory accommodates both these views, suggesting consciousness derives from quantum vibrations in microtubules, protein polymers inside brain neurons, which both govern neuronal and synaptic function, and connect brain processes to self-organizing processes in the fine scale, 'proto-conscious' quantum structure of reality."
After 20 years of skeptical criticism, "the evidence now clearly supports Orch OR," continue Hameroff and Penrose. "Our new paper updates the evidence, clarifies Orch OR quantum bits, or "qubits," as helical pathways in microtubule lattices, rebuts critics, and reviews 20 testable predictions of Orch OR published in 1998 -- of these, six are confirmed and none refuted."
An important new facet of the theory is introduced. Microtubule quantum vibrations (e.g. in megahertz) appear to interfere and produce much slower EEG "beat frequencies." Despite a century of clinical use, the underlying origins of EEG rhythms have remained a mystery. Clinical trials of brief brain stimulation aimed at microtubule resonances with megahertz mechanical vibrations using transcranial ultrasound have shown reported improvements in mood, and may prove useful against Alzheimer's disease and brain injury in the future.
Lead author Stuart Hameroff concludes, "Orch OR is the most rigorous, comprehensive and successfully-tested theory of consciousness ever put forth. From a practical standpoint, treating brain microtubule vibrations could benefit a host of mental, neurological, and cognitive conditions."
The review is accompanied by eight commentaries from outside authorities, including an Australian group of Orch OR arch-skeptics. To all, Hameroff and Penrose respond robustly.
Penrose, Hameroff and Bandyopadhyay will explore their theories during a session on "Microtubules and the Big Consciousness Debate" at the Brainstorm Sessions, a public three-day event at the Brakke Grond in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, January 16-18, 2014. They will engage skeptics in a debate on the nature of consciousness, and Bandyopadhyay and his team will couple microtubule vibrations from active neurons to play Indian musical instruments. "Consciousness depends on anharmonic vibrations of microtubules inside neurons, similar to certain kinds of Indian music, but unlike Western music which is harmonic," Hameroff explains
Isnt this cool! Its a representation of of brain waves made by reading the brain, no implants needed.
http://mashable.com/2014/04/03/3d-printing-brain-scans/?utm_cid=mash-com-Tw-main-link
Hello fellow complaint'm Silvia Miras of Barcelona (Spain). I received a message from an individual targeted, he told me it would be better to stop belonging to this group of complaint. It is contrapruducente for this well established group. Say I talk like crazy. He says the things I say do not have the profile of victims of mind control. And it's best not to harm the set I go somewhere else. I think too much disagreement with the personal interests of the group. The things I'm commenting on the space engineering on the nuva technology of creating free energies, and the things I mention discredit the personality of the group. From my point of view if you want to kill the victim has to report: Alternative therapies that are based on the aura, which is somewhat artificial, to create jobs and the economy mober. And this in my country is generating a lot of hatred against me therefore say that hurts the group. I'm talking about how bad the Cern and the whole system of research on particle physics, and that hurts people linked to that world that are benefiting from it. I'm talking about the psychological profile of the woman who gives this macanica to increase your mind, not being a mature woman psychologically and creating collateral problems (PRIMER PSYCHIC) and this creates problems in couples individually targeted .. Apparently I'm a nuisance to the group, instead of continuing the policy of this group, "basic". I have marginalized. And I suffer a lot of hate.
Have you ever heard the Hum? This artilce explains what it is, but what causes it is less certain.
A Mysterious Sound Is Driving People Insane — And Nobody Knows What's Causing It
By Jared Keller 24 hours agoDr. Glen MacPherson doesn't remember the first time he heard the sound. It may have started at the beginning of 2012, a dull, steady droning like that of a diesel engine idling down the street from his house in the Sunshine Coast of British Columbia. A lecturer at the University of British Columbia and high school teacher of physics, mathematics and biology, months passed before MacPherson realized that the noise, which he'd previously dismissed as some background nuisance like car traffic or an airplane passing overhead, was something abnormal.
"Once I realized that this wasn't simply the ambient noise of living in my little corner of the world, I went through the typical stages and steps to try to isolate the sources," MacPherson told Mic. "I assumed it may be an electrical problem, so I shut off the mains to the entire house. It got louder. I went driving around my neighborhood looking for the source, and I noticed it was louder at night."
Exasperated, MacPherson turned his focus to scientific literature and pored over reports of the mysterious noise before coming across an article by University of Oklahoma geophysicist David Deming in the Journal of Scientific Exploration, a peer-reviewed academic journal devoted to exploring topics outside of mainstream science. "I almost dropped my laptop," says MacPherson. "I was sure that I was hearing the Hum."
"The Hum" refers to a mysterious sound heard in places around the world by a small fraction of a local population. It's characterized by a persistent and invasive low-frequency rumbling or droning noise often accompanied by vibrations. While reports of "unidentified humming sounds" pop up in scientific literature dating back to the 1830s, modern manifestations of the contemporary hum have been widely reported by national media in the United Kingdom, the United States and Australia since the early 1970s.
Regional experiences of the phenomenon vary, and the Hum is often prefixed with the region where the problem centers, like the "Windsor Hum" in Ontario, Canada, the "Taos Hum" in New Mexico, or the "Auckland Hum" for Auckland, New Zealand. Somewhere between 2 and 10% of people can hear the Hum, and inside isolation is no escape. Most sufferers find the noise to be more disturbing indoors and at night. Much to their dismay, the source of the mysterious humming is virtually untraceable.
While the uneven experience of the Hum in local populations has led some researchers to dismiss it as a "mass delusion," the nuisance and pain associated with the phenomenon make delusion a dissatisfying hypothesis. Intrigued by the mysterious noise, MacPherson launched The World Hum Map and Databasein December 2012 to collect testimonies of other Hum sufferers and track its global impact (he now also moderates a decade-old Yahoo forum along with Deming).
MacPherson quickly discovered that what to him was a strange rumbling was actually having pernicious effects on hundreds of people, from headaches to irritability to sleep deprivation. There are reports that weeks of insomnia caused by the Bristol Hum drove at least three U.K. residents to suicide. "It completely drains energy, causing stress and loss of sleep," a sufferer told a British newspaper in 1992. "I have been on tranquilizers and have lost count of the number of nights I have spent holding my head in my hands, crying and crying." Thousands of people around the world have shared similar experiences of the Hum; some, like MacPherson, are devoting their time to finally uncovering its source.
Above: Self-reported experiences of the Hum, recorded as part of The World Hum Map and Database by Glen MacPhearson, British Columbia.
Tom Moir, a professor at the Auckland University of Technology and Hum investigator, first started looking into the Hum after an Auckland resident called Moir's office at Massey University in 2002. Moir, a professor of control engineering, placed an ad in the local paper after receiving a visit from a Hum sufferer who desperately wanted to find the source of the racket. He received dozens of responses within days, all describing a mysterious droning noise matching the one described in Deming's landmark paper. Residents of Auckland's northern shore claimed that the Hum was so intense that it was preventing them from sleeping or concentrating. "When it's loud, it's like there's vibrations between your ears, that your brain is vibrating," one resident told local TV in 2011. Another Auckland resident said that the noise had been so disruptive to his life that he'd deafened himself in one ear with a chainsaw so he could sleep through the night. Many had lived a life of vibroacoustic agony, unsure if what they were hearing was real or not.
"For my entire life, I was a perfect sleeper," says Steve Kohlhase, 60, who first started to experience the Hum at night in his Brookfield, Connecticut home in September 2009. A mechanical engineer in the chemical industry, Kohlhase, like so many other Hum sufferers, has devoted his free time to searching for the source of the noise. "I immediately felt the effects in my head: It feels like your fingers are in your ears. Other people have different experiences: Sometimes the floorboards in the house have a distinct vibration to them, or they they feel it in their feet in their bedsprings. Many people find their ears ringing."
Above: "The Torment of the Hum" by Rosemarie Mann (2004).
So what's behind the Hum? After nearly four decades, Hum investigators may finally have some idea. The general consensus among sufferers is that the Hum is comprised of very low frequency (or 'VLF', in the range of 3 kHz to 30 kHz and wavelengths from 10 to 100 kilometers) or extremely low frequency (or 'ELF', in the range of 3 to 30 Hz, and corresponding wavelengths from 100,000 to 10,000 kilometers) radio waves, which can penetrate buildings and travel over tremendous distances.
Both ELF and VLF waves have been shown to have potentially adverse affects on the human body. While the common refrain about ELF radiation in popular culture normally involves your cell phone giving you cancer, research by the World Health Organization and the Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers has shown that external ELF magnetic fields can induce currents in the body which, at very high field strengths, cause nerve and muscle stimulation and changes in nerve cell excitability in the central nervous system. And VLF waves, like other low-frequency electromagnetic radiation, have also been shown to have a direct impact on biological functions
Finally, there's a body of empirical evidence that makes this theory more appealing. A study funded by the Canadian government and led by University of Windsor mechanical engineering professor Dr. Colin Novak spent the last year listening to the "Windsor Hum" that's been torturing residents in the Windsor area of Ontario since 2011. A previous study had confirmed the existence of the low frequency noise in the vicinity of Zug Island, a highly industrialized island located on Michigan side of the Detroit River. The researchers used specialized equipment to capture and develop a sonic "fingerprint" of the mysterious sound. The study concluded that not only does the Windsor Hum actually exist, but its likely source was a blast furnace at the U.S. Steel plant on Zug Island, which reportedly generates a high volume of VLF waves during its hours of operation. "It sounds like a large truck or a train locomotive is parked outside your house, buzzing away, causing the windows to shake," Novak, himself a Hum sufferer, told Canada's CTV News. "It can be quite uncomfortable at times."
"I have been on tranquilizers and have lost count of the number of nights I have spent holding my head in my hands, crying and crying."
Dr. Novak's study caps off decades of Hum theories, but given the inconsistent experience of the phenomenon around the world, cataloguers of the Hum still aren't quite sure if it has a single, definitive source. While ELF and VLF waves may cause people to experience the incessant droning, not every local Hum appears to have an easily traceable source. What about the Aukland and Taos Hums? And why does the Hum seem to appear and disappear for months at a time?
Some Hum investigators suspect that there's a global source responsible for the Hum worldwide. Deming's research, considered close to authoritative in the Hum community, suggests that evidence of the Hum corresponds with an accidental, biological consequence of the "Take Charge and Move Out" (TACAMO) system adopted by the US Navy in the 1960s as a way for military leaders to maintain communications with the nation's ballistic missile submarines, land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles, and long-range bombers during a nuclear war. As part of TACAMO, military aircraft use VLF radio waves to send instructions to submarines: Because of their large wavelengths, VLF can diffract around large obstacles like mountains and buildings, propagate around the globe using the Earth's ionosphere and penetrate seawater to a depth of almost 40 meters, making them ideal for one-way communication with subs. And VLF, like other low-frequency electromagnetic waves, have been shown to have a direct impact on biological functions. (Strategic Communications Wing One at Tinker Air Force Base in Oklahoma, which is responsible for the manning, training and equipping of aircraft utilized as part of the TACAMO system, did not respond to requests for comment.)
And there are other theories. While Moir agrees with MacPherson that the disturbance is occurring at a very low frequency, he's convinced that the source of the Auckland Hum is primarily acoustic rather than electromagnetic, partially because he claims his research team has managed to capture a recording of the Hum.
Listen: An alleged recording of the Auckland Hum by Prof. Tom Moir. Plug in your headphones or increase the volume of your speaker system to maximum to hear.
Listen: A simulation of the Auckland Hum created by a research team lead by Prof. Tom Moir.
"It's a very, very low wavelength noise, perhaps between 50 or 56 Hz," Moir told Mic. "And it's extremely difficult to stop infrasound because it can have a wavelength of up to 10 meters, and you'd need around 2.5 meter thick walls, built with normal materials, to keep it out. It gets into our wooden houses very easily. And part of the reason people have so much trouble identifying the source of it is because of how low frequency the Hum is: It literally moves right through your head before you can figure out which ear picked it up first."
This isn't to say that an electromagnetic explanation is impossible: There could be both electromagnetic or acoustic sources that complement each other. The real difficulty is separating the two hypotheses through testing. "There haven't been tests done were you subject people to these frequencies and put them in an anechoic chamber," says Moir, referring to rooms designed to completely absorb reflections of either sound or electromagnetic waves. "But until you can actually prove that by doing tests, there's no way to firmly come to that conclusion."
These tests can't come soon enough for Steve Kohlhase, the mechanical engineer hunting for the Hum in Connecticut. Kohlhase, like Dr. Novak and the researchers who traced the Windsor Hum to Zug Island, hypothesizes that the source of the Connecticut Hum is industrial rather than military, generated by a network of nearby high volume gas pipelines. The arrival of the Hum, Kohlhase argues, coincided withincreased development of natural gas pipelines in northern Fairfield County, and the increased hydraulic pressure used by the Iroquois and Algonquin interstate pipelines that run through his corner of Connecticut could result in the non-directional, extremely low frequency (ELF) humming noise previously unheard in the region.
This a pressing public health issue. It is not just some casual annoyance, claims Kohlhase. The resulting infrasonic sounds blanketing the region could result in widespread vibroacoustic disease — an occupational disease occurring from long-term exposure to large pressure amplitude and low frequency noise — the symptoms of which include those often described by Hum suffers: depression, mood swings, insomnia and other stress-induced pathologies.
The Hum may transition from unexplained mystery to unfortunate byproduct of modernity, a fixture of human geography like light pollution.
State and local governments may finally be paying attention. Worried about the potential behavioral effects of the Connecticut Hum, Kohlhase dispatched concerned emails to state and local health officials laying out his research. Kohlhase was so persistent that he contacted Connecticut State Police investigators almost six weeks after the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, insisting that the Hum allegedly produced by nearby gas pipelines could have had something to do with Adam Lanza's behavior leading up to the shooting. While law enforcement officials field a flood of calls from conspiracy theorists and pranksters following any major incident, investigators deemed the information Kohlhase provided "appropriate" for inclusion in the 7,000 images, audio files, videos and documents released to the public.
"The reason that it could've affected Lanza is that sound and vibrations can have extremely subtle, detrimental affects on someone who's fragile minded," explains Kohlhase. "Imagine if you're mentally ill or have a brain tumor or are just, well, fragile of mind. I am absolutely not an expert, but if sound sensitivity is such a serious issue to those on the autism spectrum, perhaps extremely low frequency sounds can result in a pernicious effect." Kohlhase points to Aaron Alexis, the defense subcontractor who battled mental health issues and scrawled "My ELF Weapon" into the stock of his shotgun before killing 12 people at the Washington Navy Yard in 2013. "He told his psychiatrist he'd been chased by vibrations. Look at a map of instances like this, in Washington, or the Gabby Giffords shooting in Arizona, and I bet you'll see that each place coincides with a Hum cluster."
Here is the fundamental problem facing Hum sufferers around the world: believability. Scientific data and anecdotal experiences of the Hum vary so much from region the world that it's still unclear whether VLF and ELF waves are the source of it, let alone a catalyst for mass murder. The idea of a mysterious noise driving people to suicide has given birth to all kinds of pseudoscientific conjecture, making the phenomenon a favorite for conspiracy junkies who suspect foul play by some malicious government scheme (or UFOs, obviously). The World Hum, a site devoted to exploring the "mysterious phenomenon being heard by thousands around the world," is riddled with byzantine entries about UFOs crashing in Siberia.
MacPherson knows how insane it sounds. "There's a terrible irony to the vision of a conspiracy nut in a tinfoil hat, trying to keep the government from beaming thoughts into their heads," laughs MacPhearson, "since aluminum does protect against some electromagnetic radiation. This is why you don't put that stuff in the microwave."
The federally funded investigation into the Windsor Hum and the serious examination of Kohlhase's research by Connecticut authorities may serve as a beacon of hope for Hum investigators like MacPherson, Moir, Novak and Kohlhase. State-funded tests on Hum-affected regions may yield data that could lead to a real-world solution, rather than conspiracy theories. Until then, developing a unified picture of the Hum is exactly what MacPherson wants to accomplish in British Columbia. By providing one destination for Hum data and testimony, he's hoping that professional and independent researchers will use the collected data to help develop and execute experiments that could help identify the source of their local Hum.
But until someone funds and conducts rigorous tests in an affected region, says Moir, people will continue to use the Hum as an excuse to blame modern technology, from mobile phones to telecom towers to the digital radio bands used by law enforcement. And that aura of pseudoscientific insanity surrounding the Hum has made the job of independent researchers more challenging. "In the past, I've contacted my representatives, I've contacted my governor," says Kohlhase. "There's willful ignorance going on about this problem and the real consequences it has."
But should researchers like MacPherson and Moir finally pinpoint the local sources of the pain-inducing phenomenon, the Hum may transition from unexplained mystery to unfortunate byproduct of modernity, a fixture of human geography like light pollution. In the meantime, many just want to identify some relief.
"A lot of serious researchers don't want to have their name attached to that, but I'm not a formal academic researcher, and I'm quite willing to lend some credibility to this idea if I can," says MacPherson. "This phenomenon is real and many people are suffering: I'm just trying to do the best I can to help
Have you ever heard the Hum? This artilce explains what it is, but what causes it is less certain.
A Mysterious Sound Is Driving People Insane — And Nobody Knows What's Causing It
By Jared Keller 24 hours agoDr. Glen MacPherson doesn't remember the first time he heard the sound. It may have started at the beginning of 2012, a dull, steady droning like that of a diesel engine idling down the street from his house in the Sunshine Coast of British Columbia. A lecturer at the University of British Columbia and high school teacher of physics, mathematics and biology, months passed before MacPherson realized that the noise, which he'd previously dismissed as some background nuisance like car traffic or an airplane passing overhead, was something abnormal.
"Once I realized that this wasn't simply the ambient noise of living in my little corner of the world, I went through the typical stages and steps to try to isolate the sources," MacPherson told Mic. "I assumed it may be an electrical problem, so I shut off the mains to the entire house. It got louder. I went driving around my neighborhood looking for the source, and I noticed it was louder at night."
Exasperated, MacPherson turned his focus to scientific literature and pored over reports of the mysterious noise before coming across an article by University of Oklahoma geophysicist David Deming in the Journal of Scientific Exploration, a peer-reviewed academic journal devoted to exploring topics outside of mainstream science. "I almost dropped my laptop," says MacPherson. "I was sure that I was hearing the Hum."
"The Hum" refers to a mysterious sound heard in places around the world by a small fraction of a local population. It's characterized by a persistent and invasive low-frequency rumbling or droning noise often accompanied by vibrations. While reports of "unidentified humming sounds" pop up in scientific literature dating back to the 1830s, modern manifestations of the contemporary hum have been widely reported by national media in the United Kingdom, the United States and Australia since the early 1970s.
Regional experiences of the phenomenon vary, and the Hum is often prefixed with the region where the problem centers, like the "Windsor Hum" in Ontario, Canada, the "Taos Hum" in New Mexico, or the "Auckland Hum" for Auckland, New Zealand. Somewhere between 2 and 10% of people can hear the Hum, and inside isolation is no escape. Most sufferers find the noise to be more disturbing indoors and at night. Much to their dismay, the source of the mysterious humming is virtually untraceable.
While the uneven experience of the Hum in local populations has led some researchers to dismiss it as a "mass delusion," the nuisance and pain associated with the phenomenon make delusion a dissatisfying hypothesis. Intrigued by the mysterious noise, MacPherson launched The World Hum Map and Databasein December 2012 to collect testimonies of other Hum sufferers and track its global impact (he now also moderates a decade-old Yahoo forum along with Deming).
MacPherson quickly discovered that what to him was a strange rumbling was actually having pernicious effects on hundreds of people, from headaches to irritability to sleep deprivation. There are reports that weeks of insomnia caused by the Bristol Hum drove at least three U.K. residents to suicide. "It completely drains energy, causing stress and loss of sleep," a sufferer told a British newspaper in 1992. "I have been on tranquilizers and have lost count of the number of nights I have spent holding my head in my hands, crying and crying." Thousands of people around the world have shared similar experiences of the Hum; some, like MacPherson, are devoting their time to finally uncovering its source.
Above: Self-reported experiences of the Hum, recorded as part of The World Hum Map and Database by Glen MacPhearson, British Columbia.
Tom Moir, a professor at the Auckland University of Technology and Hum investigator, first started looking into the Hum after an Auckland resident called Moir's office at Massey University in 2002. Moir, a professor of control engineering, placed an ad in the local paper after receiving a visit from a Hum sufferer who desperately wanted to find the source of the racket. He received dozens of responses within days, all describing a mysterious droning noise matching the one described in Deming's landmark paper. Residents of Auckland's northern shore claimed that the Hum was so intense that it was preventing them from sleeping or concentrating. "When it's loud, it's like there's vibrations between your ears, that your brain is vibrating," one resident told local TV in 2011. Another Auckland resident said that the noise had been so disruptive to his life that he'd deafened himself in one ear with a chainsaw so he could sleep through the night. Many had lived a life of vibroacoustic agony, unsure if what they were hearing was real or not.
"For my entire life, I was a perfect sleeper," says Steve Kohlhase, 60, who first started to experience the Hum at night in his Brookfield, Connecticut home in September 2009. A mechanical engineer in the chemical industry, Kohlhase, like so many other Hum sufferers, has devoted his free time to searching for the source of the noise. "I immediately felt the effects in my head: It feels like your fingers are in your ears. Other people have different experiences: Sometimes the floorboards in the house have a distinct vibration to them, or they they feel it in their feet in their bedsprings. Many people find their ears ringing."
Above: "The Torment of the Hum" by Rosemarie Mann (2004).
So what's behind the Hum? After nearly four decades, Hum investigators may finally have some idea. The general consensus among sufferers is that the Hum is comprised of very low frequency (or 'VLF', in the range of 3 kHz to 30 kHz and wavelengths from 10 to 100 kilometers) or extremely low frequency (or 'ELF', in the range of 3 to 30 Hz, and corresponding wavelengths from 100,000 to 10,000 kilometers) radio waves, which can penetrate buildings and travel over tremendous distances.
Both ELF and VLF waves have been shown to have potentially adverse affects on the human body. While the common refrain about ELF radiation in popular culture normally involves your cell phone giving you cancer, research by the World Health Organization and the Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers has shown that external ELF magnetic fields can induce currents in the body which, at very high field strengths, cause nerve and muscle stimulation and changes in nerve cell excitability in the central nervous system. And VLF waves, like other low-frequency electromagnetic radiation, have also been shown to have a direct impact on biological functions
Finally, there's a body of empirical evidence that makes this theory more appealing. A study funded by the Canadian government and led by University of Windsor mechanical engineering professor Dr. Colin Novak spent the last year listening to the "Windsor Hum" that's been torturing residents in the Windsor area of Ontario since 2011. A previous study had confirmed the existence of the low frequency noise in the vicinity of Zug Island, a highly industrialized island located on Michigan side of the Detroit River. The researchers used specialized equipment to capture and develop a sonic "fingerprint" of the mysterious sound. The study concluded that not only does the Windsor Hum actually exist, but its likely source was a blast furnace at the U.S. Steel plant on Zug Island, which reportedly generates a high volume of VLF waves during its hours of operation. "It sounds like a large truck or a train locomotive is parked outside your house, buzzing away, causing the windows to shake," Novak, himself a Hum sufferer, told Canada's CTV News. "It can be quite uncomfortable at times."
"I have been on tranquilizers and have lost count of the number of nights I have spent holding my head in my hands, crying and crying."
Dr. Novak's study caps off decades of Hum theories, but given the inconsistent experience of the phenomenon around the world, cataloguers of the Hum still aren't quite sure if it has a single, definitive source. While ELF and VLF waves may cause people to experience the incessant droning, not every local Hum appears to have an easily traceable source. What about the Aukland and Taos Hums? And why does the Hum seem to appear and disappear for months at a time?
Some Hum investigators suspect that there's a global source responsible for the Hum worldwide. Deming's research, considered close to authoritative in the Hum community, suggests that evidence of the Hum corresponds with an accidental, biological consequence of the "Take Charge and Move Out" (TACAMO) system adopted by the US Navy in the 1960s as a way for military leaders to maintain communications with the nation's ballistic missile submarines, land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles, and long-range bombers during a nuclear war. As part of TACAMO, military aircraft use VLF radio waves to send instructions to submarines: Because of their large wavelengths, VLF can diffract around large obstacles like mountains and buildings, propagate around the globe using the Earth's ionosphere and penetrate seawater to a depth of almost 40 meters, making them ideal for one-way communication with subs. And VLF, like other low-frequency electromagnetic waves, have been shown to have a direct impact on biological functions. (Strategic Communications Wing One at Tinker Air Force Base in Oklahoma, which is responsible for the manning, training and equipping of aircraft utilized as part of the TACAMO system, did not respond to requests for comment.)
And there are other theories. While Moir agrees with MacPherson that the disturbance is occurring at a very low frequency, he's convinced that the source of the Auckland Hum is primarily acoustic rather than electromagnetic, partially because he claims his research team has managed to capture a recording of the Hum.
Listen: An alleged recording of the Auckland Hum by Prof. Tom Moir. Plug in your headphones or increase the volume of your speaker system to maximum to hear.
Listen: A simulation of the Auckland Hum created by a research team lead by Prof. Tom Moir.
"It's a very, very low wavelength noise, perhaps between 50 or 56 Hz," Moir told Mic. "And it's extremely difficult to stop infrasound because it can have a wavelength of up to 10 meters, and you'd need around 2.5 meter thick walls, built with normal materials, to keep it out. It gets into our wooden houses very easily. And part of the reason people have so much trouble identifying the source of it is because of how low frequency the Hum is: It literally moves right through your head before you can figure out which ear picked it up first."
This isn't to say that an electromagnetic explanation is impossible: There could be both electromagnetic or acoustic sources that complement each other. The real difficulty is separating the two hypotheses through testing. "There haven't been tests done were you subject people to these frequencies and put them in an anechoic chamber," says Moir, referring to rooms designed to completely absorb reflections of either sound or electromagnetic waves. "But until you can actually prove that by doing tests, there's no way to firmly come to that conclusion."
These tests can't come soon enough for Steve Kohlhase, the mechanical engineer hunting for the Hum in Connecticut. Kohlhase, like Dr. Novak and the researchers who traced the Windsor Hum to Zug Island, hypothesizes that the source of the Connecticut Hum is industrial rather than military, generated by a network of nearby high volume gas pipelines. The arrival of the Hum, Kohlhase argues, coincided withincreased development of natural gas pipelines in northern Fairfield County, and the increased hydraulic pressure used by the Iroquois and Algonquin interstate pipelines that run through his corner of Connecticut could result in the non-directional, extremely low frequency (ELF) humming noise previously unheard in the region.
This a pressing public health issue. It is not just some casual annoyance, claims Kohlhase. The resulting infrasonic sounds blanketing the region could result in widespread vibroacoustic disease — an occupational disease occurring from long-term exposure to large pressure amplitude and low frequency noise — the symptoms of which include those often described by Hum suffers: depression, mood swings, insomnia and other stress-induced pathologies.
The Hum may transition from unexplained mystery to unfortunate byproduct of modernity, a fixture of human geography like light pollution.
State and local governments may finally be paying attention. Worried about the potential behavioral effects of the Connecticut Hum, Kohlhase dispatched concerned emails to state and local health officials laying out his research. Kohlhase was so persistent that he contacted Connecticut State Police investigators almost six weeks after the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, insisting that the Hum allegedly produced by nearby gas pipelines could have had something to do with Adam Lanza's behavior leading up to the shooting. While law enforcement officials field a flood of calls from conspiracy theorists and pranksters following any major incident, investigators deemed the information Kohlhase provided "appropriate" for inclusion in the 7,000 images, audio files, videos and documents released to the public.
"The reason that it could've affected Lanza is that sound and vibrations can have extremely subtle, detrimental affects on someone who's fragile minded," explains Kohlhase. "Imagine if you're mentally ill or have a brain tumor or are just, well, fragile of mind. I am absolutely not an expert, but if sound sensitivity is such a serious issue to those on the autism spectrum, perhaps extremely low frequency sounds can result in a pernicious effect." Kohlhase points to Aaron Alexis, the defense subcontractor who battled mental health issues and scrawled "My ELF Weapon" into the stock of his shotgun before killing 12 people at the Washington Navy Yard in 2013. "He told his psychiatrist he'd been chased by vibrations. Look at a map of instances like this, in Washington, or the Gabby Giffords shooting in Arizona, and I bet you'll see that each place coincides with a Hum cluster."
Here is the fundamental problem facing Hum sufferers around the world: believability. Scientific data and anecdotal experiences of the Hum vary so much from region the world that it's still unclear whether VLF and ELF waves are the source of it, let alone a catalyst for mass murder. The idea of a mysterious noise driving people to suicide has given birth to all kinds of pseudoscientific conjecture, making the phenomenon a favorite for conspiracy junkies who suspect foul play by some malicious government scheme (or UFOs, obviously). The World Hum, a site devoted to exploring the "mysterious phenomenon being heard by thousands around the world," is riddled with byzantine entries about UFOs crashing in Siberia.
MacPherson knows how insane it sounds. "There's a terrible irony to the vision of a conspiracy nut in a tinfoil hat, trying to keep the government from beaming thoughts into their heads," laughs MacPhearson, "since aluminum does protect against some electromagnetic radiation. This is why you don't put that stuff in the microwave."
The federally funded investigation into the Windsor Hum and the serious examination of Kohlhase's research by Connecticut authorities may serve as a beacon of hope for Hum investigators like MacPherson, Moir, Novak and Kohlhase. State-funded tests on Hum-affected regions may yield data that could lead to a real-world solution, rather than conspiracy theories. Until then, developing a unified picture of the Hum is exactly what MacPherson wants to accomplish in British Columbia. By providing one destination for Hum data and testimony, he's hoping that professional and independent researchers will use the collected data to help develop and execute experiments that could help identify the source of their local Hum.
But until someone funds and conducts rigorous tests in an affected region, says Moir, people will continue to use the Hum as an excuse to blame modern technology, from mobile phones to telecom towers to the digital radio bands used by law enforcement. And that aura of pseudoscientific insanity surrounding the Hum has made the job of independent researchers more challenging. "In the past, I've contacted my representatives, I've contacted my governor," says Kohlhase. "There's willful ignorance going on about this problem and the real consequences it has."
But should researchers like MacPherson and Moir finally pinpoint the local sources of the pain-inducing phenomenon, the Hum may transition from unexplained mystery to unfortunate byproduct of modernity, a fixture of human geography like light pollution. In the meantime, many just want to identify some relief.
"A lot of serious researchers don't want to have their name attached to that, but I'm not a formal academic researcher, and I'm quite willing to lend some credibility to this idea if I can," says MacPherson. "This phenomenon is real and many people are suffering: I'm just trying to do the best I can to help
Thus article has interesting information for two reasons. It talks about free will. The neural monitoring again is done with an EEG. They afe finding that thoughts concerning are up to a second before the conscious is aware of it. From my experience, the perps can almost read 3 seconds ahead. This is interesting because the tech used may be similar to n EEG. Its all noninvasive tech only.
LiveScience MENU Search FOLLOW
Free Will May Just Be the Brain's 'Background Noise,' Scientists Say
By Tia Ghose, Staff Writer
Date: 19 June 2014 Time: 12:30 PM ET
It's a question that has plagued philosophers and scientists for thousands of years: Is free will an illusion?
Now, a new study suggests that free will may arise from a hidden signal buried in the "background noise" of chaotic electrical activity in the brain, and that this activity occurs almost a second before people consciously decide to do something.
Though "purposeful intentions, desires and goals drive our decisions in a linear cause-and-effect kind of way, our finding shows that our decisions are also influenced by neural noise within any given moment," study co-author Jesse Bengson, a neuroscientist at the University of California, Davis, wrote in an email to Live Science. "This random firing, or noise, may even be the carrier upon which our consciousness rides, in the same way that radio static is used to carry a radio station."
This background noise may allow people to respond creatively to novel situations, and it may even give human behavior the "flavor of free will," Bengson said. [The 10 Greatest Mysteries of the Mind]
Predetermined or random
Sir Isaac Newton's laws of classical mechanics suggested the universe was deterministic, with an inevitable effect for every cause. By Newtonian logic, a "freely" made decision is completely predetermined by the actions that precede it.
But quantum physics revealed that subatomic particles' behavior is inherently unpredictable. As a result, physical forces like gravity and electromagnetism can't completely dictate the future based on past events, thus leaving a tiny window for free will to operate through the random behavior of subatomic particles.
Still, many philosophers doubted that the random behavior of miniscule particles could translate to free will, because quantum effects don't hold much sway at larger scales.
Experiments performed in the 1970s also raised doubts about human volition. Those studies, conducted by the late neuroscientist Benjamin Libet, revealed that the region of the brain that plans and executes movement, called the motor cortex, fired prior to people's decision to press a button, suggesting this part of the brain "makes up its mind" before peoples' conscious decision making kicks in.
Hidden signal?
To understand more about conscious decision making, Bengson's team used electroencephalography (EEG) to measure the brain waves of 19 undergraduates as they looked at a screen and were cued to make a random decision about whether to look right or left. [10 Surprising Facts About the Human Brain]
When people made their decision, a characteristic signal registered that choice as a wave of electrical activity that spread across specific brain regions.
But in a fascinating twist, other electrical activity emanating from the back of the head predicted people's decisions up to 800 milliseconds before the signature of conscious decision making emerged.
This brain activity wasn't strictly a signal at all — it was "noise," part of the brain's omnipresent and seemingly random electrical firing. In fact, neuroscientists usually consider this background noise meaningless and subtract it when trying to figure out the brain response to a specific task, said Rick Addante, a neuroscientist at the University of Texas at Dallas who was not involved in the research.
In other words, some hidden signal in the background noise of the brain seemed to determine people's conscious decisions before they made them.
"That's what's wild about it; it's not all noise," Addante told Live Science. "The question then becomes, what is it, and what is the information that it contains?"
Open question
The new study doesn't prove or disprove free will, Addante said.
"If there's something else occurring before our conscious awareness that's contributing to our decision, that raises the question about the extent of our free will," Addante said. On the other hand, the findings might open the door to free will by suggesting it rides on, but isn't quite the same as, the random background noise in our brains, he said.
But Ali Mazaheri, a neuroscientist at the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands, sees the results as a blow to true free will.
The findings suggest that previous biases in the firing of the brain's sensory processing systems add up, leading people to decisions that the conscious brain later follows, said Mazaheri, who was not involved in the study.
Useful illusion?
But if free will is an illusion, why does it feel so real?
Though that's still a mystery, one theory is that life would be too depressing without the illusion of choice, making it hard for humans to survive and reproduce.
"The idea is that you have the illusion of free will as an artifact to be able to get through life," Mazaheri told Live Science.
The new findings were published in April in the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
Follow Tia Ghose on Twitter and Google+. Follow Live Science @livescience, Facebook & Google+. Original article on Live Science.
This is a scientist that is studying how to edit DNA strand caps to cure death!
What do you think about never dying of old age? Then we would just have to learn not to kill each other.....I guess one thing at a time!
