my perp actually thinks i have no choice but to pay him! this is something exceedingly DUMB. but he says i owe him for his time spent by "shaping" me. He cost all that i had over last 14 yrs, and i am supposed to pay him for this. i would like to die of his torture before paying him! he simply wiped my life out-and to pay him for this? i would not pay him 1 cent. He even has destroyed some of my loved ones, and blocked the rest of them from caring for me.
All Posts (12449)
Ifi anyone knew about this site and kept it to themselves they have got to be a part of it
A remote tracking system with a dedicated monitoring center EP2047439 A2 (text from WO2008008669A2) ABSTRACT A remote tracking system is described that includes one or more remote tracking devices, where each remote tracking device including a cellular transceiver, a positioning system receiver, and a processor connected to the positioning system receiver and the cellular transceiver. A dedicated monitoring center is in communication with each of the remote tracking devices and includes a monitoring center application to process and store the location information and status information received from each of the at least one remote tracking device The monitoring center also includes agents available as an initial contact point when the monitoring center application determines that attention to a particular remote tracking device is required. The system further includes a portal through which an authorized user responsible for one or more of the at least one remote tracking device can access information related to each of the remote tracking devices. CLAIMS (OCR text may contain errors) CLAIMS What is claimed is: 1. A remote tracking system comprising: at least one remote tracking device, each remote tracking device including a cellular transceiver, a positioning system receiver operable to generate location information by receiving signals indicative of the location of the remote tracking device, and a processor connected to the positioning system receiver and the cellular transceiver, the processor operable to generate status information for the remote tracking device; and a dedicated monitoring center in communication with each of the at least one remote tracking devices using the cellular transceiver of each of the remote tracking devices, the monitoring center including a monitoring center application to process and store the location information and status information received from each of the at least one remote tracking device, monitoring center agents available as an initial contact point when the monitoring center application determines from the location information and/or status information that attention to a particular remote tracking device from the at least one remote tracking device is required, and a portal through which an authorized user responsible for one or more of the at least one remote tracking device can access information related to each of the at least one remote tracking device. 2. The remote tracking system of claim 1 wherein each remote tracking device of the at least one remote tracking device is further operable to generate alarm conditions as a result of comparing the location information for the remote tracking device to a set of programmed rules for the remote tracking device, and wherein the alarm conditions are transmitted to the dedicated monitoring center. 3. The remote tracking system of claim 1 wherein the monitoring center application is operable to generate alarm conditions as a result of comparing the location information for the remote tracking device to a set of programmed rules for the remote tracking device. 4. The remote tracking system of claim 1 wherein the dedicated monitoring center is able to initiate two-way voice communication with each of the remote tracking devices. 5. The remote tracking system of claim 1 the authorized user can modify parameters and rules for those particular remote tracking devices over which the authorized user has responsibility. 6. The remote tracking system of claim 5 wherein the monitoring center application can send the modified parameters and rules to the particular remote tracking device. 7. The remote tracking system of claim 1 wherein the monitoring center application stores biographical information for a wearer of each remote tracking device. 8. A monitoring center application for use in a remote tracking system, the remote tracking system including a plurality of remote tracking devices generating location information and status in formation and in communication with the monitoring center application, the monitoring center application comprising: a data processing function operable to process the location information and status information for each of the plurality of remote tracking devices; an alert function operable to alert an agent from a pool of agents when the data processing function determines that an alert condition exists for a particular remote tracking device; and a portal allowing authorized personnel responsible for one or more of the plurality of remote tracking devices to access the monitoring center application. 9. The application of claim 8 further comprising a setup function operable to create and modify parameters and rules for each of the remote tracking devices. 10. The application of claim 8 wherein the monitoring application also receives indications of alarm conditions from the plurality of remote tracking devices. 11. The application of claim 10 wherein the alarm conditions are rules violations determined by a remote tracking device comparing its location to a set of preprogrammed rules. 12. The application of claim 9 wherein the alarm management system can send new parameters and rules to a particular remote tracking device using the cellular transceiver of the remote tracking device. 13. The application of claim 8 wherein the monitoring center application is able to establish a two-way voice communication between a remote tracking device and the remote monitoring center. 14. The application of claim 8 wherein monitoring center application is able to activate a high decibel siren on the remote tracking device. 15. A method for tracking and monitoring a plurality of remote tracking devices in a remote tracking system, the remote tracking devices generating location information and status in formation, the method comprising: receiving the location in formation and status information from each of the plurality of remote tracking devices; storing the location and status information for each of the remote tracking devices generating alerts for an agent selected from a pool of agents based on the location information and status information; and providing access to the location information and status information to authorized users responsible for one or more of the plurality of remote tracking devices. 16. The method of claim 15 wherein receiving also includes receiving alarm conditions generated by a remote tracking device from the plurality of remote tracking devices. 17. The method of claim 15 further comprising generating an alarm condition based on the location information and/or status information from a particular remote tracking device from the plurality of remote tracking devices. 18. The method of claim 15 further comprising establishing a two-way voice communication with a remote tracking device from the plurality of remote tracking devices. 19. The method of claim 15 further comprising sending modifies parameter and rules to a remote tracking device from the plurality of remote tracking devices. 20. The method of claim 15 further comprising activating a high decibel siren in a remote tracking device from the plurality of remote tracking devices. DESCRIPTION (OCR text may contain errors) A REMOTE TRACKING SYSTEM WITH A DEDICATED MONITORING CENTER TECHNICAL FIELD [0001] The field of the present invention relates to remote tracking and communication systems and devices, and more particularly to dedicated monitoring center for use in systems for tracking and monitoring person using remote devices. A REMOTE TRACKING SYSTEM WITH A DEDICATED MONITORING CENTER BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0002] The Global Positioning System (GPS) is very well known as a mechanism for providing relatively accurate positioning information using small portable devices. To create a remote tracking device useful for tracking or monitoring persons GPS devices need a mechanism to transmit the location information from the GPS to a central site where a record of the person's location can be maintained. There have been several devices that have used terrestrial wireless or cellular networks coupled to a GPS engine to transmit the location data to a central repository. The GPS/cellular device can either transmit the raw GPS data over the cellular network to a central system which can then process the GPS data to determine the location of the device, or if enough processing power is built into the remote tracking device the GPS calculations can be done on the remote tracking device and the derived location information can be transmitted to the central repository. A time stamp can be associated with the location information to provide temporal context for the location information. [0003] An example of such a device is described in U.S. Patent No. 6,014,080 to Layson, Jr. The remote tracking device of Layson, Jr. includes a tamper resistant strap and housing which holds a GPS engine and a wireless data modem. The remote tracking device communicates with a central station computer using the wireless data modem and transmits the location data for the remote tracking device. The central station includes a computer which is operable to take the position information from the remote tracking device and to compare that location information against a schedule of rules and location restraints to determine if the remote tracking device has strayed from a permitted inclusion zone or has entered a forbidden exclusion zone. [0004] Another remote tracking device is described in U.S. Patent No. 6,072,396 to Gaukel. The remote tracking device of Gaukel is a two-piece device with a tamper resistant unit securely attached to the person to be monitored. The secure unit is connected to, or in communication with, a body-worn device that includes a GPS engine and a cellular modem. As with Layson, Jr., the cellular modem is used to communicate the location information from the GPS engine to a control station. [0005] Yet another remote tracking device and system is described by U.S. Patent No. 5,867,103 to Taylor, Jr. The remote tracking device of Taylor, Jr. includes a tamper detection mechanism, a mechanism for receiving a signal from a positioning device, such as a GPS satellite, and a transmitter for transmitting a signal to a central station. The system for monitoring the remote devices includes a position determining mechanism for computationally determining the location of the remote device based on the signal from the positioning device and a temporal marking mechanism for providing a time stamp associated with the location determination. [0006] While each of these devices shares a similar use of GPS and cellular or wireless data technology to gather information about the position of the remote device and to transmit information about the position to a central computer, each of these devices also suffer from the same deficiencies. Examples of these deficiencies are the lack of an ability to do anything with the information once it is received at the central computer. At most the central computers of these devices can generate messages of rules violations that can be transmitted to a parole officer or other recipient. The systems do not provide for any context for the message about the violation and do not provide for computer access to information about the remote tracking device and any violations or a monitoring center which can be contacted by the remote tracking device and the parole officer or other supervisor who has responsibility for the person being monitored. [0007] These systems pass all location data obtained from the tracking devices directly through to the parole officer or supervisor has responsibility for the person being monitored. This places the task of sorting through the mountain of location data directly on the parole officer or supervisor who may be in charge of a great number of persons being monitored. Placing such a heavy burden on the parole office or supervisor is generally undesirable and a waste of resources. [0008] Further, these systems do not allow for voice communication with the person wearing the remote monitoring device. Some of the devices described above can initiate tones or vibrations in the device in the event of a rules violation, but none have the ability to initiate voice communication between the person being monitored and personnel at a monitoring center or the persons parole officer or supervisor. [0009] Still further, these devices to not have any type of alarm system, alarm management, or alarm hierarchy which can be used to warn the person being monitored, or, as a last resort, warn those in the vicinity of the person being monitored that a violation is occurring. BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION [0010] In one embodiment, the concepts described herein are directed to a remote tracking system. The remote tracking system includes at least one remote tracking device, where each remote tracking device including a cellular transceiver, a positioning system transceiver, or receiver, operable to generate location information by receiving signals indicative of the location of the remote tracking device, and a processor connected to the positioning system transceiver and the cellular transceiver, the processor operable to generate status information for the remote tracking device. The system also includes a dedicated monitoring center in communication with each of the at least one remote tracking devices using the cellular transceiver of each of the remote tracking devices, the monitoring center including a monitoring center application to process and store the location information and status information received from each of the at least one remote tracking device. The dedicated monitoring center also includes monitoring center agents available as an initial contact point when the monitoring center application determines from the location information and/or status information that attention to a particular remote tracking device from the at least one remote tracking device is required, and a portal through which an authorized user responsible for one or more of the at least one remote tracking device can access information related to each of the at least one remote tracking device. [0011] In another embodiment a monitoring center application for use in a remote tracking system is described, where the remote tracking system includes a plurality of remote tracking devices generating location information and status in formation and in communication with the monitoring center application. The monitoring center application includes a data processing function operable to process the location information and status information for each of the plurality of remote tracking devices, an alert function operable to alert an agent from a pool of agents when the data processing function determines that an alert condition exists for a particular remote tracking device, and a portal allowing authorized personnel responsible for one or more of the plurality of remote tracking devices to access the monitoring center application. [0012] In yet another embodiment a method for tracking and monitoring a plurality of remote tracking devices in a remote tracking system is described where the remote tracking devices generating location information and status in formation. The method includes receiving the location in formation and status information from each of the plurality of remote tracking devices, and storing the location and status information for each of the remote tracking devices. The method further includes generating alerts for an agent selected from a pool of agents based on the location information and status information, and providing access to the location information and status information to authorized users responsible for one or more of the plurality of remote tracking devices. [0013] The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be described hereinafter which form the subject of the claims of the invention. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and specific embodiment disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. The novel features which are believed to be characteristic of the invention, both as to its organization and method of operation, together with further objects and advantages will be better understood from the following description when considered in connection with the accompanying figures. It is to be expressly understood, however, that each of the figures is provided for the purpose of illustration and description only and is not intended as a definition of the limits of the present invention. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS [0014] For a more complete understanding of the present invention, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing, in which: [0015] FIGURE 1 is a diagram illustrating the major elements of a remote tracking system according to the concepts described herein; [0016] FIGURE 2 is a perspective view of a remote tracking and communication device according to the concepts described herein; [0017] FIGURE 3 is a schematic view of the electrical components in a remote tracking and communication device; [0018] FIGURES 4A-C are flow charts illustrating embodiments of a data processing methods and data reporting methods using the remote tracking system; [0019] FIGURE 5 is a flow chart illustrating an embodiment of a data processing method using the remote tracking system; [0020] FIGURE 6 is a chart illustrating an embodiment of a monitoring center administration flow according to the concepts described herein [0021] FIGURE 7 is a flow chart illustrating an embodiment of a monitoring center call flow according to the concepts described herein; [0022] FIGURE 8 is a illustration of a screen shot showing an embodiment of a status monitor for a remote tracking device according to the concepts described herein; and [0023] FIGURES 9A-9J are flow charts illustrating embodiments of monitoring center application flows for the setup, assignment and modification of various aspects associated with a remote tracking system according to the concepts described herein. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION [0024] Preferred embodiments of a remote tracking device and monitoring system according to the concepts described herein provides for a remote tracking that includes two-way voice communication between the person being monitored and monitoring center personnel or the persons parole officer, supervisor, or other administrator. It also provides for an alarm system for the remote tracking device and associated alarm management system and alarm hierarchy which is capable of warning the offender and potentially those around the offender of a violation of the terms and conditions surrounding the monitoring. Still further, it provides for a comprehensive monitoring system that includes a staffed monitoring center and access by the parole officer, supervisor or administrator to information and tools to manage the information related to the person being monitored and the status of the person and remote tracking device. [0025] Referring now to Figure 1, a simplified diagram showing the major elements of a preferred embodiment of a remote tracking system according to the concepts described herein is shown. System 100 is used to track multiple remote tracing devices (RTDs). Each RTD 101 includes a positioning system engine, such as a global positioning system (GPS) engine, which is able to receive signals from one or more sources, either terrestrial networks or satellite network such as multiple GPS satellites 102, and to perform a location calculation based on the signals from the sources. While preferred embodiments described herein will use references to GPS, any position system engine or transceiver, terrestrial, airborne or satellite based, may be used in place of GPS according to the scope of the concepts described herein, including the Galeleo satellite tracking system. Applicant intends the use of GPS herein to be generic to any positioning system and to include all positioning systems. Location determination using terrestrial networks, satellite, or assisted satellite (using satellite signals in association with terrestrial signals such as cellular signals to provide a more precise location determination), is well known and will not be discussed further herein. [0026] In addition to a GPS engine, the RTD includes a wireless/cellular transceiver. After a location determination has been made by the GPS engine or an internal microprocessor, the location information and information indicating the status of the RTD is sent over a terrestrial network, which is preferably a cellular network, as shown by cellular network 103. In order to be useful, each position location for the RTD needs to include an indication of the time for the location. In a preferred embodiment, the RTD uses the time information contained in the GPS signals themselves to provide the time indication for the position determination, however, instead of using the time information from the GPS signal, the RTD itself may provide the time indication from an internal clock. An internal clock may also be used to provide time indications on when data packets were created and sent using the cellular connection. [0027] The information sent by the RTD over its cellular connection is received by monitoring center 104. Monitoring center 104 is preferably a staffed monitoring center providing representatives who can act as an intermediary between the person being monitored and the parole officer, supervisor or administrator with responsibility for the person being monitored. The monitoring center also includes the computer resources required to process, store and analyze the data received from the RTDs and provide the interface for the officers/supervisors/administrators to review the information in the system and to setup, modify and terminate the operating parameters for each individual RTD. [0028] Access to the information in the monitoring center is available through a web interface which connects to a network 105, such as the Internet, which allows persons with authorization 106 outside the monitoring center to access information in the monitoring centers computers. Additionally, cellular network 103 can also be used to establish two-way voice communication between the RTDs and the monitoring center, or responsible officer/supervisor/administrator. While reference is made to two-way voice communication, the term two-way is meant to encompass any interactive voice communication involving two or more parties, including three or more- way voice communication and would include conference type calls and multiparty calls. The two-way voice communications may use the same infrastructure as the data connections between the RTD and monitoring center, or may use completely different infrastructure or paths through the network than the data connections. Other third parties may also be in the voice or data path between the RTD and monitoring center to provide any number of functions, including the recording and archival of the voice communications between the RTD and monitoring center, and still be within the scope of the concepts described herein. [0029] Referring now to Figure 2, an embodiment of the physical characteristics a remote tracking device 200 according to the concepts described herein is shown in greater detail. Device 200 includes housing 201 with battery 202 removably affixed thereto. The single housing is configured to contain all electrical components necessary for tracking and communicating with the individual wearing device 200. Battery 202 provides power to the electronic circuitry within housing 201, as described below, and is preferably rechargeable. Top side 203 of housing 201 includes a first set of through ports 204. Another side 205 of housing 201 includes a second set of through ports 206. The first set of through ports 204 are configured to allow sound to pass through to a microphone (not shown) disposed within housing 201, while the second set of through ports 206 are configured to allow sound to pass outward from a speaker (not shown) which is also disposed within the housing 201. Top side 203 of housing 201 also includes two panels 207 and 208, at least one of which is configured as a rocker button to activate one or more of the electronic components described below. [0030] The rear face of device 200 includes an appropriate curvature so that it can be attached to a person's body, preferably to an ankle. Battery 202, which is inserted into the bottom side of device 200, includes a release lever (not shown) which is movable to release the battery from the housing. Each end of a strap 209 (partially shown) is secured within an extension on each side of housing 201, such as extension 210. Strap 209 and the strap connections to housing 201 are tamper resistant and include security measures intended to prevent the disconnection or severing of strap 209, or if strap 209 is severed, device 200 can provide a signal indicating the status of the strap. The strap preferably includes one or more optical fibers and/or conductive materials embedded throughout its length, each of which is exposed at either end of the strap and connected to the electronics in device 200 which can determine the integrity of the connections. [0031] Additional tamper detection may be achieved through monitoring all externally accessible fasteners, e.g., the screws affixing the pressure block to the housing, the external battery, and the like, for electrical continuity by using each fastener to complete, or as part of, an electrical circuit. [0032] Referring now to Figure 3, an embodiment of the electronic aspects of the remote tracking device is shown. The type of connection between the various components is a matter of design choice, and may vary depending upon the specific component chosen to perform for a particular function. Further, where a specific component is indicated, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the indicated component may be substituted with other, functionally equivalent components that are readily available in the marketplace. [0033] Electronics 300 includes microprocessor 301. Microprocessor 301 controls overall operation of the device according to programming stored in memory 302, which can be SRAM memory. Electronics 300 may include inputs 303, which can be inputs such as switches or buttons, are included as inputs to microprocessor 301 and can be used to input data or provide for activation of pre-designated functionality controlled by microprocessor 301. hi embodiments of the RTD, there is one button dedicated for activation of voice communications with the monitoring center. LEDs 304 are used as function and status indicators. The programming stored in memory 302 may be placed there at the time of manufacture, and additional, new or modified programming may be uploaded to the device using a wired connection via the included diagnostic interface 305, user interface 306, or wirelessly via the cellular transceiver 307 received by antenna 308. [0034] Cellular transceiver 307 may be of the GSM/GPRS variety, and may include a SIM card 309. Cellular transceiver 307 allows two-way voice and data communication between the remote device and the monitoring center 104 from Figure 1. Voice communications are further enabled by a direct connection between cellular transceiver 307 and an audio codec 310, which encodes and decodes the digital audio signal portion of the wireless transmission, and an associated speaker 311 and microphone 312. Data communications preferably use the cellular data channel and/or the cellular control channel, which can make use of short message service (SMS) capabilities in the network. This has additional benefits in that it provides redundancy for cellular systems in which service for both types of data communication is supported. Also, for those cellular systems in which the voice channel cannot be used simultaneously with the data channel, or in which the data channel is simply unavailable, the control channel can provide a data link between the call center and the device. [0035] Electronics 200 may also include short range wireless transceiver 313 and associated antenna 314, which, if included, allow for short range wireless voice and data communications with peripheral devices. This second wireless transceiver 114 can be chosen to utilize the wireless communications standard published by the ZigBee Alliance, information about which may be found at www.zigbee.org. Wireless transceiver 313, however, maybe designed and implemented using any of the alternative wireless communication standards which are well known in the art. Microprocessor 301 can be programmed to pass through voice communications received by cellular transceiver 307 to a voice-capable peripheral when such a peripheral is employed in conjunction with the remote tracking and communication device and is activated. Voice communications received from a voice enabled peripheral can be passed through to cellular transceiver 307 for transmission. Data generated by the device or received from a peripheral, if any, may be stored by microprocessor 301 in memory 315, which can be non- volatile memory such as serial flash memory until required by microprocessor 301 or until it is to be transmitted by the device. [0036] GPS receiver 316 and antenna 317 receive signals transmitted by GPS satellites, the signal used to establish the geographical location of the device and the person being monitored, hi one embodiment, data from GPS receiver 316 is passed through to microprocessor 301, which in turn processes the data to determine a location and associated time, and stores it in the serial flash memory 315 pending transmission using cellular transceiver 307. While electronics 300 are shown with a GPS receiver which passes the GPS signal data to the microprocessor for processing, a GPS engine which includes both the GPS receiver and the capability to process the GPS signal to produce a location determination and associated time indication may also be used according to the concepts described herein. Using a stand alone GPS engine would free processing bandwidth in the microprocessor, thereby allowing the microprocessor to perform other additional functions. [0037] Cellular transceiver 307 may also be used to geographically locate the device through well known methods of cell tower triangulation, or may be used to provide location information used in assisted GPS schemes. Geographical location using cellular transceiver 307 may be performed in addition to, in conjunction with, or as a substitute for the GPS receiver 316. Other known methods for geographically locating the device may also be employed. [0038] Either of memories 302 and 315, or memory resident on the microprocessor, may be used individually, or may be used in any combination to store the operating program and parameters for the operation of the device, as will be discussed later, and may further be used to store prerecorded messages which can be played through speaker 311 as part of the monitoring and alarm management system which will be discussed in greater detail below. A siren/speaker 323 may also be included in the device and controlled by microprocessor 301. Siren 323 is also used as part of the alarm system and can be activated to provide a high decibel audible alarm. This alarm can both warn those in the vicinity that the person being monitored has entered an exclusion zone or left an inclusion zone, and can aid the police in the location of the person being monitored. The siren can be activated automatically by the microprocessor as part of the alarm management system or can be activated remotely by sending a signal to the microprocessor using cellular transceiver 307. Siren 323 can be a separate device or could be combined with the functionality of speaker 311. Tamper detection circuit 322 monitors the condition of strap 209 from Figure 2 and any other tamper detection sensors that may be part of housing 201. [0039] In the embodiment shown in Figure 3, power to the processor and other electronic components is provided though power controller 318 by external battery 319, or internal battery 320 when the external batter is disconnected or the voltage of the external battery falls below a threshold. External battery 319 is removable and is preferably rechargeable by a separate recharging unit. Also, the person being monitored will preferably have multiple external batteries so that a charged external battery can be immediately inserted when a discharged battery is removed. Internal battery 320 is preferably internal to the housing and not accessible by the person being monitored. The internal battery allows the device to continue to operate normally while the external battery is being replaced. As the internal battery is intended to supply power to the device only during the transitioning from a depleted external battery to a charged external battery, or to provide a short amount of time to acquire a charged battery, the internal battery does not need to have a large capacity. Internal battery 320 is charged using power from external battery 319 using voltage converter 321 and/or a battery charger which may be connected to the device through voltage converter 321. [0040] Since RTD 200 is intended to be worn around the ankle of the person being monitored, the microphone and speaker used for two-way voice communication is a significant distance from the ears and mouth of the person being monitored. To compensate for this a peripheral device may be used in conjunction with the RTD to aid in the two-way voice communication. In one embodiment the peripheral device has the form factor of a watch and includes an internal speaker, an internal microphone, and an internal short range wireless transceiver. The microphone and speaker are positioned in the housing of the peripheral to better enable voice communications. The short range wireless transceiver is configured to use the same wireless communications standard as the RTD to enable wireless voice and data communications between the device and the peripheral. A button can be included which, when pressed, causes a command signal to be sent to the RTD. This command signal can be used to instruct the remote tracking and communication device to initiate two-way voice communications with the monitoring center. When the peripheral device is used for such voice communications, the peripheral device communicates wirelessly with the RTD using the respective short range wireless transceiver of each respective unit, and the RTD then uses the cellular transceiver to connect the voice communications with the monitoring center. The microphone and speaker in the RTD can be disabled by the microprocessor when a peripheral device, such as described, is in use. [0041] Using electronics such as those described above, embodiments of a remote tracking devices according to the concepts described herein may be programmed with a variety of useful features. One such feature is the ability to track the geographical location the individual wearing the device. Most frequently, the GPS receiver is used to determine the location of the device (and thus the wearer) at the time indicated in the GPS signals received from GPS network satellites. When the GPS is unable to determine location, the cellular transceiver may be used to determine the location of the device using well-known cellular tower triangulation techniques. Once identified, the location of the device is passed to the microprocessor, which processes the data according to its programming and stores the data in the memory. [0042] As illustrated in method 430 shown in Figure 4B, in some embodiments each element of location data, including the time is collected, as shown by process 431, and along with the current status of the RTD, process 432, is placed into a datagram, process 433, and send through the cellular transceiver immediately, process 436, as long as the RTD has a good cellular signal, process 434. If there is not a good cellular signal, the RTD stores the datagram and all subsequent datagrams, process 435 until a good cellular signal is detected by the RTD. When the good cellular signal is established all of the unsent datagrams are then sent to the monitoring center computers over the cellular network, process 436. [0043] In other embodiments, the datagrams may be stored and sent in batches. In batch send embodiments, method 430 would repeat processes 431, 432 and 433 until a predetermined number of datagrams were stored, or until a timer expired before continuing on to process 434. [0044] hi yet other embodiments, any number of operations, such as (in this example) the batch sending of datagrams, could be determined from environmental factors and not tied to a predetermined or preprogrammed number, such as the number of datagrams or a predetermined timer, as is illustrated in method 450 shown in Figure 4C. hi method 450, the environmental conditions are monitored to determine if the period, or frequency of the operation, should be adjusted. These environmental conditions could be any condition that might require a different reporting frequency, such as the current speed of the RTD, the location of the RTD, conditions/events detected by the RTD, such as physiological conditions/events, sensor inputs to the RTD, notices of conditions or events from the monitoring center, or any other environmental condition, event or factor. Operations could include, but are not limited to, sending of data by the RTD, performing location determinations, issuing alerts to the wearer, generating alarm conditions, or any other operation that my be tied to environmental conditions, events or factors. For movement speed, for example, the RTD can determine, from comparing previous location and time measurements, the rate of movement of the RTD, and by association its wearer. As a result, the RTD may determine that location information needs to be sent more frequently and may further determine that more frequent location determinations need to be made. Similarly, if the RTD is approaching an exclusion zone or the edge of an inclusion zone, the RTD may determine that more frequent location determinations should be made and/or transmitted to that the system is more quickly aware of a violation that would occur at normal rates. Though speed and proximity are used as examples of environmental factors that could be used to determine batch send frequency or even location determination frequency and factor that can be monitored and used in the frequency determination is included in the concepts described herein. [0045] hi process 452 of method 450 it is determined if the batch send timer needs to be adjusted. If yes, process 453 adjusts the timer accordingly. Process 454 then determines if the timer has expired, if not, the method returns to process 451. If the timer has expired the method passes to process 455, which sends the accumulated datagrams. [0046] As referenced above, embodiments of the remote tracking devices and/or the remote tracking system can be programmed to track the location of an RTD with respect to inclusion and exclusion zones, hi these embodiments the microprocessor can be programmed to compare location data against rules which establish predefined geographical areas where the person being monitored is required to be (inclusion zones), or forbidden from being (exclusion zones). These zones can be tied to specific times of the day, such as curfews. A curfew is defined by a geographical area within which the device (and thus the wearer) needs to be physically located during specified times. Examples of curfew rules include requiring the wearer to be at a home area during the evening and overnight hours or at a work area during work hours. An inclusion zone is a geographical area within which the wearer is required to remain during specified times or a boundary outside of which the wearer is not allowed to travel. Inclusion zones and curfews, under these definitions, can also therefore be layered. For example, there may be a permanent inclusion zone, such as the county of residence of the wearer, outside of which the wearer is not allowed to travel without specific permission. Inside of this permanent zone there may be time specific zones, such as the wearers home during overnight hours or workplace between 8 am and 5 pm. [0047] An exclusion zone is a geographical area outside of which the wearer is required at all times. The rules can be established for any particular device at the time of initialization, modified at any time, or even temporarily suspended, at any time through changes to the parameters entered into the monitoring center computers and downloaded to the device, or entered directly into the device through direct connections to the diagnostic or user interface components of the device, hi addition to geo-zone type rules, rules dictating a "report-in" type requirement may also be programmed into the device. These "report-in" rules could be used to satisfy report in requirements for some parolees. The device would be programmed with chronological points at which the wearer could be notified, such as by a prerecorded voice message stored on the device, to contact the monitoring center or other person at that time, or within a specified interval. The wearer could activate the voice communication on the device or could report in by other means. Further, rules for monitoring physiological conditions/events can be programmed into the device. Sensors on the remote tracking device, or peripherals to the remote tracking device, could be used to monitor physiological conditions. If measurements associated with those physiological conditions fall outside an expected range, which could be programmed in the form of a rule, or if a physiological event occurs as detected by a sensor, an alarm condition could be generated by the processor and sent to the monitoring center. [0048] As described, the memory can be utilized to store prerecorded voice messages or other audio which provide feedback during operation of the device. Prerecorded voice messages, are preferred to tones or vibrations because they do not require a reference manual or knowledge of the wearer for interpretation, hi addition to alarm type messages, voice message feedback may be advantageously utilized during initial setup of the device in that it provides step-by- step instructions for the setup routine, including directing the administrative user to input information about the device and user into the database via the web application described below. Voice message feedback may be similarly utilized during the detachment process to ensure that the device is removed by an authorized individual. During the removal process, if the audible instructions are not followed, i.e., inputting requested information into the database, then the device is preferably programmed to generate an alarm, which is processed as described below. [0049] Following the initial power-up sequence, the device may be programmed to establish a data connection with a monitoring center computer, or central server, to which the device provides device-specific identification data. This eliminates any need for the administrative user to connect the device to a local computer or terminal for the initialization process. The monitoring center computer(s) is/are programmed to maintain a data base of data sent by tracking and communication devices. Upon initial contact, the central server creates a database entry using the device-specific identification data. [0050] The administrative user is provided access to data on the central server via a computer or terminal, m instances where the device is used as a tracking device for offenders, the administrative user may be the supervision officer or other authority figure. For other service applications, the administrative user and the wearer may be the same individual. Access to the database may be advantageously implemented as a web application, or it may be implemented as a stand alone application. [0051] During normal operation, the GPS receiver identifies the geographical location of the device, and the microprocessor processes and stores that location data according to its programming. The device may be programmed such that geographical location is continuously monitored or monitored at specified intervals. In certain embodiments, with an appropriate peripheral, the device may also be programmed to monitor physiological conditions of the wearer. The microprocessor actively monitors other components of the device for indications of tampering, battery exchanges/replacements, and equipment failure. [0052] Referring now to Figure 4A, a flow chart is shown illustrating an embodiment of a method 400 by which microprocessor 301 from Figure 3 can monitor and processes certain conditions. The microprocessor is preferably programmed to collect and store location data and data related to the status of the device and other monitored conditions in the flash memory, as shown by process 401. The microprocessor is further programmed to perform additional functions based upon application of the rules to the data collected, shown by process 402, upon predetermined intervals, or upon occurrence of a particular condition, such as, e.g., when tampering is detected, when the wearer has entered an exclusion zone, when the external battery need to be replaced, or when the wearer's heartbeat is irregular or no longer detectable, the latter requiring a separate peripheral. [0053] When an alarm condition is raised or action is otherwise required, as shown by process 403, whether because the action is preprogrammed based on the status of the device, or the action is the result of a command received from the monitoring center, the monitoring center server or the administrative user, the microprocessor proceeds through a series of queries to determine the appropriate action. It should be noted that both the condition resulting in an action, and the action taken the microprocessor, are preferably programmable through the monitoring center, the web application or through a direct interface connection to the device. The first query 404 is whether to send data to the monitoring center by immediately initiating a data connection with the central server to transmit data relating to an alarm or data that is stored in memory, as shown in process 405. Next query 406 determines if siren 323 from Figure 3 is activated, producing an audible alert, as shown by process 407. [0054] The next query 408 determines whether the RTD should play one of the pre-recorded messages stored in memory, as shown by process 409. Query 410 determines whether to call the monitoring center by initiating a two-way voice communication using the cellular transceiver, as shown by process 411. Finally query 412 determines if the RTD should take some other programmed action as shown by process 413. Other actions may include, but are not limited to, storing data related to an alarm in memory for transmission at a later time, storing updated rules data to memory, or suspending rule violations notification for a period of time. While queries 404, 406, 408, 410 and 412 are shown in Figure 4A in a particular order, the order is arbitrary and may be modified by programming the device. [0055] As an example of method 400, in instances where the location data indicates the device is located outside of a geographical location permitted by the rules, the RTD may provides audio feedback to the wearer indicating the rule violation, in the form of a siren or a prerecorded message, and immediately sends notice to the central server for additional processing. The notice would includes the geographical location of the device, the time of the location, and an indicator of the rule violated. If the wearer did not respond to the prerecorded message, the RTD might then escalate the alarm condition by establishing a two-way call with the monitoring center. The monitoring center personnel would then attempt to direct the wearer to leave the exclusion zone and verify that the wearer was complying with the request. If the wearer still did not comply with the request, the alarm condition could be escalated still further by activating the siren on the RTD and the monitoring center could then contact the local authorities and direct them to the wearer. [0056] Figure 4A and the above example illustrates an alarm management system in accordance with the concepts described herein. Although the example above recited specific steps, the concepts described herein relate to any alarm management system where the remote tracking device and the remote tracking system step through a series of alarm conditions and upon failure by the wearer to resolve the alarm condition, escalate the alarm to a higher level of response or intervention. Such alarm conditions could include, but are not limited to, battery alarms, rules violation alarms, tampering alarms and any other condition that can be programmed into the device and recognized by the device. [0057] Referring now to Figure 5, an embodiment of a method 500 illustrates processing data from the device when it is received at the central server. Initially, the central server determines if the data includes information that was expressly requested by an operator at the call center or by the administrative user, as shown by process 501, and if so, the data is relayed to the operator or administrative user for display at a computer or terminal, process 502. Next, the central server determines if the data includes a standard tracer record in process 503, which may include self- identification of the device, self-diagnostic reports, upload audit logs, component version identification, confirmation of parameter changes such as volume control, suspending audible alarms at the device, activating or deactivating the speaker, and the like. Standard tracer records are processed as necessary and noted in the database, as shown in process 504. [0058] If the data does not include a tracer record, the central server determines if the data is an indicator of an alarm condition in process 506. If the data is indicative of an alarm condition, the central server determines if the alarm is a repeat of an alarm which was previously received and reported, as shown by process 507. For alarms that were not previously received, the central server takes the appropriate notification action as programmed by the administrative user, as described by process 508. [0059] If the data is not indicative of an alarm condition, the central server determines whether the individual wearing the device is subject to geographical location rules in process 509. In such instances, the central server determines whether a rule has, in fact, been violated, process 510, and determines if an alarm condition exists, process 511. When an alarm condition is raised, the central server first determines if the alarm is a repeat of a previous alarm, as shown in process 512, and if so, takes the appropriate notification action as programmed by the administrative user in process 513. [0060] When immediate administrative user notification is not required, or no alarm condition is raised, the data is stored in the database, as shown by process 514, and reported to the administrative user in periodic reports which at least lists all alarm conditions received since provision of the last report. All recorded data may optionally be included in the report. [0061] In embodiments of the remote tracking system according to the concepts described herein, the notification actions are fully configurable by the administrative user through the web application. The administrative user may designate specific types of alarms for immediate notification, and notification may be arranged through one or more methods including fax, email, text messaging to a pager, text messaging to a cellular phone, or through a direct call from the call center, or the like. In addition, the administrative user may also designate that some specific types of alarms result in direct notification to local authorities for immediate action. [0062] The web application may also provide the administrative user with the ability to temporarily suspend reactions to specific types of alarms. During suspension, the device will suspend localized reactions only (i.e., pre-recorded voice messages, siren, initiating voice communications with the call center). The device will still transmit all alarms identified during suspension to the central server, which will in turn include all identified alarms in the periodic reports (e.g., weekly) to the administrative user. The web application may also provide the administrative user and call center operators with the ability to enter and store notes. Notes may be in the form of personal daily monitoring logs, calendared appointments or action items, case management directives, or contextual notations related to particular alarms saved within the database. [0063] In embodiments of the remote tracking system, the central server may enable the call center or the administrative user, through the web application, to send commands or other data to the device. Such commands may include playing a prerecorded message to the wearer, instructing the microprocessor to transmit data to provide a current status of the location and status of the device, and the like. The administrative user may also use the web application to instruct to the call center to initiate voice communications with the wearer. The call center then contacts the wearer by placing a cellular call to the cellular transceiver. Once the wearer is contacted, the call center then initiates a call to the administrative user and conferences the two calls. [0064] Preferably, all voice communications with the device are made through the call center so that all calls may be recorded and saved within the database. This enables the call center and the administrative user to access the recorded calls at a later time as needed. To ensure that all calls are recorded, the cellular transceiver may be configured to block all incoming calls that do not originate from the call center. Alternatively, the cellular transceiver may be configured to selectively block incoming calls by utilizing the area code and telephone prefix to identify the origin of the call, allowing calls only from selected area codes and prefixes. Alternatively, the cellular transceiver may selectively block all calls except those from list of phone numbers that is stored in memory. [0065] In embodiments of the remote tracking system, the wearer may also initiate voice communications with the call center, hi these embodiments, at least one of the buttons on the exterior of the device housing may be configured to activate voice communications using the cellular transceiver. When pressed, the device is programmed such that cellular transceiver may only contacts the monitoring center. The device preferably has stored in memory a primary number for the call center and a secondary number in case a connection cannot be achieved on the primary number. Further, the device is programmed to attempt make a predetermined number of attempts to contact the call center, first at the primary number, then at the secondary number. Should all attempts fail, the device is preferably programmed to sound an alert condition to the wearer as an indication that the device is out of a cellular service area or requires service for an internal fault. [0066] As has been referenced above, the monitoring center, or call center, is the focal point of the preferred embodiments of the remote tracking system according to the concepts described herein. The monitoring center is able to communicate with the remote tracking devices, the wearers of the remote tracking devices, and the officers, supervisors or administrators in charge of the persons wearing the RTDs. The monitoring center is also the repository for all the data collected from the RTDs and allows direct access to the data by the monitoring center employees and remote access by the administrators through the web application. The monitoring center also provides the mechanisms for establishing and modifying the operating parameters of the RTDs, including the rules for each wearer. [0067] Referring now to Figure 6, an example of an embodiment of a monitoring center administration flow 600 is shown. Flow 600 begins with the login access 626. Administrator login 601 provides a user with administrator privileges access to the entirety of flow 600, including administrator flow 627, operator flow 628, script manager flow 629, fulfillment home 630, and supervisor flow 631. Lesser login privileges, such as supervisor login 602, operator login 603, script manager login 604 and fulfillment login 605 provided only access to their respective flows and any less included flows, such as the supervisor login providing access to supervisor flow 631 and operator flow 628. [0068] Administrator flow, accessible by an authorized administrator, includes access to the administrator home 606 and to agency overview functions 607 and manage agency functions 608, as well as employee management functions 609. Supervisor privileges provides access to supervisor home 610, manage user functions 611, as well as to employee management functions 610. Supervisor privileges also provide access to operator flow 628 as does operator privileges. Operator flow 628 includes access to operator home 612 which includes access to reports functions 613, messaging functions 614, client and offender detail 615 and 616, respectively, and to search function 617. Client detail 615 and offender detail 616 provide further access to demographics functions 620 which contains access to contacts 621 and medical history 622. [0069] Script manager privileges provide access to script manager home 618 and to script management functions 619. Fulfillment privileges provides access to fulfillment home 623 and device management functions 624 and device assignment functions 625. [0070] A preferred embodiment of a call monitoring center in accordance with the concepts described herein includes a monitoring center which is staffed 24 hours, seven days a week. The monitoring center is responsible for monitoring all of the remote tracking devices in the field and is staffed based on historical patterns of requirements for intervention by monitoring center staff. The computers of the monitoring center automatically receive and process the location and status information continuously or periodically sent by each of the remote tracking devices. Based on programmable rules in the monitoring center software, the occurrence of certain conditions in the remote tracking devices results in the monitoring center software sending an alert to one of the monitoring center personnel. These conditions are usually related to alarm conditions in a remote tracking device, but can be programmed to be any condition which might be of interest to the monitoring center personnel or the supervisors or administrators of the person being monitored. [0071] When a condition is determined to require the attention of monitoring center personnel, the monitoring center software determines the appropriate monitoring center agent and sends the alert to the agent's terminal. The agent can then respond to the alert or access data in the monitoring center computers related to the history of the remote tracking device, the current parameters programmed into the remote tracking device, information on the wearer of the device or the agency or administrator in charge of the wearer and the device. If intervention, such as the initiation of a two-way voice call, is required by the agent, the monitoring center software provides a predetermined script for the agent to follow to ensure that the intervention by the agent conforms to the policies of the monitoring center and the agency or supervisor responsible for the tracking device and wearer. [0072] In addition to the monitoring center software generating an alert which requires the attention of a monitoring center agent, agents may be required to respond to incoming calls from various interested persons including the wearer of the remote tracking device or the supervisor or administrator of a wearer or device. Referring now to Figure 7, an embodiment of a call routing system 700 for use in the call monitoring center is described. Routing system 700 is operable to receive incoming calls from a variety of sources 701, 702, 703 and 704, which could be the wearer of a remote tracking device 702, a supervisor or administrator 703, or other incoming call 701 or 704. A routing function 705 in the monitoring center call system determines the appropriate agent to receive the call from currently active agents at the center. The call may be routed based on the source of the call or may be routed based on a queue of available agents or any other routing criteria which may be used to select an appropriate agent. [0073] Once the agent has been selected the application passes the call details to the agent's terminal as shown by process 706. hi process 707, the application uses the dialed number to select an application context, and then in process 708 determines a call handling flow for each specific type of call. Call routing system 700 also includes a contingent process flow 709 for situations in which no call detail information is available to determine context and call flow for the agent. In the contingent process 709, the agent manually enters the caller's phone number into the agent application which then looks up the customer records and uses those records to determine the appropriate context and flow for the call. [0074] As has been described, embodiments of the remote tracking device maintain status on themselves in the form of states for various aspects of the devices. This status is sent to the monitoring center and maintained by the monitoring center application. Monitoring center personnel, or supervisors or administrators can access the status of the any particular device under their control. An example of the types of status which can be maintained by the RTD and monitoring center is shown in Figure 8. Figure 8 is an illustration of a screen shot of an embodiment of the monitoring center application in accordance with the concepts described herein. While Figure 8 shows particular aspects of the RTD on which status is maintained other aspects of the RTD, it's operating environment, or operating conditions can also be maintained within the scope of the concepts described herein. [0075] Referring now to Figures 9A through 9 J, embodiments of flow charts illustrating the operation and functionality of an embodiment of aspects of the monitoring center software and/or applications are shown. Figure 9A illustrates an embodiment of an agency setup flow. Agency setup flow 900 illustrates a process by which an administrator or operator can create an agency for which one or more officers will be assigned RTDs that will be monitored by the monitoring center. Figure 9B illustrates an embodiment of an officer/administrator setup flow. Officer setup flow 901 illustrates the process by which officers/administrators of a particular agency can be setup with control over particular RTDs and provided access to the monitoring center application. [0076] Figure 9C illustrates an embodiment of an offender/wearer setup flow. Offender/wearer setup flow 902 illustrates the process by which supervisors or agents of the monitoring center or officers/administrators of a particular agency can setup particular RTDs and provided relevant and required information to the monitoring center application concerning each offender wearer of an RTD. Figure 9D illustrates an embodiment of an offender/wearer assignment flow. Assignment flow 903 illustrates the process by which officers/administrators of a particular agency are assigned with authority over particular RTDs and offenders/wearers. [0077] Figure 9E illustrates an embodiment of an offender/wearer device assignment flow. Device assignment flow 904 illustrates the process by which individual offenders/wearers are assigned with particular RTDs. Figures 9F, 9G and 9H illustrate an embodiment of an inclusion/exclusion zone, referred to collectively as geo- zones, setup flow. Geo-zone setup flows 905, 906 and 907 illustrate the process by which operators or officers/administrators can setup inclusion and exclusion zone rules for a particular RTDs and offender/wearer. [0078] Figure 91 illustrates an embodiment of an contact monitoring center flow. Assignment flow 903 illustrates the process by which the monitoring center can be contacted by standard message, live chat or email. Figure 9J illustrates an embodiment of an offender/wearer scheduling flow. Scheduling flow 909 illustrates the process by which operators or officers/administrators of a particular agency can manage alarm schedules for particular RTDs and offenders/wearers. [0079] Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Moreover, the scope of the present application is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiment's of the process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, means, methods and steps described in the specification. As one of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate from the disclosure of the present invention, processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps, presently existing or later to be developed that perform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding embodiment's described herein may be utilized according to the present invention. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include within their scope such processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps. |
How can you harm with food, hiding in the guise of a blessing when you give it every time with a dash of insult and hypocrisy, poison to the body, poison to the heart, poison to the soul?
How can you intentionally misdirect and give me false info, and ask everyone to "see what she's saying" when it's actually you who's doing everything - street theatre, mind-mapping, link-feeding so the assessments and decisions I will make will be base on them?
How can you curtail my right to earn for myself and my kid, decimate me in my circles, my work, my peers and ridicule me for being a baggage, a charity case?
How can you pull the strings and destroy what I toiled for, eliminate all options for me, push me in a corner you control, then daily ridicule and ask me why I am staying in that nook you forced me in?
How can you even go about acting all too altruistic in front of people and continually claim you're being too kind. . a martyr providing a home when the reason i am only there is because you took my own home away from me?
30/11/12
what a day,it gets worse,sharp pains all over body constant bombardment,no sleep yet again awake all night so i miss my football,blood ridiculous,pain in mouth ,teeth,side of face ,arms ,back,everywhere even in private parts,its in human to do this,i have emailed mi5 not that its going to do much cop,i got strong evidence its the police and will continue my life exposing them all,just sat in my flat and the torture is unreal but too tired to go out,now they have cut off my money so i wont get nothing,i cant go to work as they wont let me sleep.what do you do???i am a threat to exposing them thats why they want rid,torture is so poweful,i had an accident when i was young and out for 6 months,car accident,you couldnt see skin on my back,that pain is no where near this pain,they are as if they are in the room thats how clear it is,they also pretend to bang doors etc,stupid prix,they must be having a laff,got told if you do suffer pain use heat to stop it,it works 2,only thing is its my whole flippin body unless you go to have a sauna all day then unless someone can come up with a sensible idea about heating youself,they also use cold aswell,i got loads of sox on and they are turning myfeet to ice,i got heating on and every other part is roasting,how cruel,then ppl ant understand why or how can u not sleep,the pain like real which it is but like face to face,they turning up the notches,i could very easily sleep as got tons of pills,why should i give in to them bastardsmi took two 800 mg,my dosage is that and if they wont let me sleep on that theres something wrong,i wanna c my mum,shes 74 and a cripple and this twat is laffing,the fecking coventry police are a flipping disgrace,they experiment to see how you react to different things,this prick is torturing me so bad,its like someones put u on a table strapped up and turning ur legs round and round while you scream,thats how sik they are,thepain to make you cry yourself to sleep,they will ease off this afternoon then wake me up around 4.45pm so i missed my football,cant even watch a film or anything,sslowly but surely they taking the things i love away,sharpest pains yet again designed to kill me,if i die its the coventry city police who murdered me
best wishes n love lots,
denny
these are the people who originally gangstalked me
jenny and paddy
35 morey st
foleshill
coventry
england
both were used in vile attacks against me
For the one who's milking this issue for what it's worth, go back to your bases where you can stand arrogant knowing you are holding on a string both the right and the left.
Divide and conquer that has always been your tack from the get-go.
Except that I never allowed you to use me in hurting and maligning the ones who you wanted me to attack.
Do not ever mistake the stand I am making now as victory on your side for you managed to have me make a stand against the people you were shaping me to hate even as a young child.
If I am making a stand against them now, it is because of what they have done and what they have allowed YOU to DO, through them.
..............................................................................................
I only have this to ask of my family:
When did my siblings start associating with them? Only a few years. And in that short a span of time, they were able to decimate our family - the same way they had the clan go at each other's throat, behind closed doors.
In that short a time you do not even see anything wrong with having them attack your own and you even take the center-stage for them.
Do you not see the irony?
I was the one who was with them my entire life , minus about 3 years when I already knew I've had it.
Do you not even see why they still had good relations with you and my siblings and they can not openly attack you unlike the way they attack other members of the clan.
Because all the times I was with them, I never indulged them in their attempts to have me go against you.
I am saying this now, since I know you have a grasp of how they attack other branches of the family tree:
I have grown up knowing how their lead figure so hated my father. He actually hates all of you, except that his rancor for my father is more "special" in that he scoffs at any successes he thinks people "just believe" my father has. All my life I have seen how he considers my father's failures as his successes.
Did I let him affect my view of you? Did I let him attack you through me?
Not ever.
All the while when they would cajole me into going against any of you, I never gave in to their manipulation. All my life I tried to dumb myself and not make concrete what I was observing what I was sensing because I loved them as I love you. I will forever thank them for lending me one of the very few people who showed me I was worth loving. That's why it took this long to finally bring this out in the open.
Even when I so wanted to protect myself, I couldn't because I know how the person who taught me what loving really is so loved them. I know she wouldn't want all of us to go against each other. So I took the only route I know I could take. Stay away from all of you.
miss feeling the joy and the lafter
never thought this could happen
as the perps send you dafter
feelings emotions up in the air
what a life
not something to share
caged in this flat
twenty four seven
please,please god take me to heaven
just simple things i want
nothing too high
even look out the window
and gaze at the sky
so empty and clear
a beautiful day
then the torture begins
how can it be this way
fry you to panic
and just full of tears
sick of this and feeling this fear
what 2morrow brings
i know this for certain
as you close the window
and draw the curtains
like punch n judy
the pain is so real
numb in your legs
even simplicity to feel
so whats the next day have installed for me
am a piece of software
on my pc
the torture it lasts and will never stop
hurting
24/7 praying you dont wake up
the reality is whats to wake up for
knowing your pain you been given
will happen some more
dont be so scared
just live in fear
cannot cry
even dry tears,throughout our lives
can you please stop the hurting
same old same old
draw back the curtains
best wishes n love lots
denny
cold blooded murder
them perps out to get us
so tired of lies
no sleep
so restless
to make someone
feel so much anger and pain
them prick feelings under your skin
like the falling rain
cant turn off there power
cant reason,cant explain
tomorrow will come
and more of the same
when the day comes
and are victories won
there will be nowhere
for the perps to run
fingers crossed,hands held high
cold blooded murder
let them bastards fry
best wishes and love lots
denny
it use to be weapons of mass destruction
which arent the same threat
and thats my assumption
where once there was peace
with your mind so clear
why is this world troubled with fear
they want wars
to show them whos boss
with electromagnetic weapons
that cause so much loss
the goverments feel fear
when people explore
seek truth and justice
for once and for all
poured that much money into
controlling ones mind
people and poverty
are left behind
with experiments from past
and right up to date
one thing in common
torture and hate
my life is for the tortured years gone by
now chemtrails forever filling our sky
we must unite and expose them all
the time is coming
goverments will fall
then we regain
what they stole years ago
how could they make us feel so low
rapture,exstatic,round of applause
the end of harrassment and microwave wars
any poem are from what i have wrote
peace and harmony
best wishes n love lots
denny
Bio-electromagnetic weapons can kill, torture, enslave and escape detection at the speed of light
by Harlan Girard
On February 8, 2010, George Noory interviewed Dr. John Hall on his radio show Coast to Coast. Hall, a practicing physician, discussed his work with thousands of victims of electronic harassment, stalking, and mind control and how CIA/NSA technology is being used to track, intimidate, and even read the thoughts of people. The technology, which can create voices in a person’s head, simulates mental illness, leading many to think that victims are delusional, he explained. Yet the stalking component, common in many cases, is a clear sign that the harassment is not just in their head.
There are some methods to deflect attacks from directed energy weapons like particle beams, ultrasound, and laser; but audio harassment, such as communications beamed directly into the head via microwaves, and blanketed low frequency waves are harder to stop, he said. According to his intelligence contacts, the technology to enable these techniques comes from satellites, rather than someone on the ground.
Electronic harassment victims are about 70 percent female, who sometimes suffer from sexual assaults, he reported. In some cases, the victims have gotten on the wrong side of a large law firm, or private investigators are involved, yet Hall believes the harassment cases could be a form of government experimentation. He is calling for a congressional hearing to bring an end to this kind of harassment/experimentation and recommends that victims contact the organization Freedom from Covert Harassment & Surveillance www.freedomfchs.com.
Interestingly, James Walbert recently won a court case in which his former business associate was ordered to stop using “electronic means” to harass him.
The Ultimate Weapon
Electromagnetic weapons operate at the speed of light; they can kill, torture and enslave; but the public is largely unaware that they exist because these weapons operate by stealth and leave no physical evidence. Electromagnetic weapons have been tested on human beings since 1976. By widely dispersing the involuntary human test-subjects, and vehemently attacking their credibility, it has been possible for the United States to proceed with these human experiments unhindered by discussions or criticisms, let alone opposition. This ultimate weapon system is currently being deployed in Iraq. The US Air Force and the Marine Corps refer to it as “active denial technology”, as if it were used purely for defense, but it is not...
Reading Brain Waves and Mind Control
In 1959, Saul B. Sells, a professor of social psychology at a minor US university submitted a proposal to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to build for them the most sophisticated electroencephalography machine that would have an integral computational capacity to analyze and, hopefully, make sense of the brain waves it recorded. In other words, the professor proposed to make a machine that could tell the CIA what a person was thinking, whether or not the person wished to disclose that information.
The CIA approved the project in 1960, adding some library research with five objectives. The fifth objective of the research was, “Techniques for Activating the Human Organism by Remote Electronic Means”. The entire assignment was thereafter known as MKULTRA subproject 119, MKULTRA being the CIA’s notorious mind control program. It was based on the erroneous notion that the Soviets already possessed the means to control minds and the US had to catch up as rapidly as possible.
The documents pertaining to MKULTRA subproject 119 are now held in the National Security Archives (a non-governmental organization) at George Washington University in Washington, D.C.1 John Marks, author of The Search for the Manchurian Candidate: The CIA and Mind Control, (Times Books, New York, 1979) donated the MKULTRA documents; his book was republished by W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., New York, 1991 and is still in print.
Project Bizarre followed MK-ULTRA subproject 119 in 1965. The purpose of Bizarre was to record and analyze the complex microwave signal allegedly being beamed at the American Embassy in Moscow by the Soviets from a building across the street. The interesting thing about Project Bizarre is that while the United States has denied to this very day that there could be adverse health effects from microwave radiation, it immediately suspected that “the Moscow signal” was producing a variety of health effects in Embassy personnel, particularly in the successive ambassadors at whose office it was claimed the signal was being beamed. At the same time that the State Department was testing embassy personnel for DNA breaks produced by the Moscow signal, it felt constrained from complaining to the Soviets because the power of their signal was a tiny fraction of what the U.S. said was a safe, human exposure level. Journalist Barton Reppert has written the most authoritative account of the Moscow signal.2 (Editor’s note: DNA breaks from exposure to mobile phones have been confirmed in recent lab research.)
Converting Sound to Microwaves
In 1973, Joseph C. Sharp, an experimental psychologist at Walter Reed Army Institute of Research performed an experiment that was pivotal to the development of the torture equipment being shipped to Iraq today. He had James Lin set up equipment in his laboratory which converted the shape of sound waves into microwave radiation that enabled him to hear himself vocalize the names of the numbers from one to ten in his head, by-passing the mechanism of his own ears. This particular experiment was never published but is mentioned in Lin’s book, Microwave Auditory Effects and Applications, published in 1978.5
The experiment has been confirmed in US Patent 6 587 729, “Apparatus for Audibly Communicating Speech Using the Radio Frequency Hearing Effect”.6 This patent is for an improved version of the apparatus used in the 1973 laboratory experiment, issued on July 1, 2003 and assigned to the Secretary of the Air Force. It provides scientific evidence that it is possible to hear threatening voices in one’s head without suffering from paranoid schizophrenia.
Why has this patent been published openly at a time when the U.S. Government is practicing a degree of secrecy that rivals Stalin’s Kremlin? I have no satisfactory answer, except to say that the apparatus in the patent has already been superseded by equipment that achieves the same effect by far more sophisticated means. It blocks the normal processes of memory and thought by remote electronic means, while at the same time supplying false, distorted and/or unpleasant memories and suggestions by means of a process called “synthetic telepathy”. The equipment that produces synthetic telepathy is sometimes referred to as “influence technology”.
While voices and visions, daydreams and nightmares are the most astonishing manifestations of this weapon system, it is also capable of crippling the human subject by limiting his/her normal range of movement, causing acute painthat is the equivalent of major organ failure or even death, and interfering with normal functioning of any of the human senses. In other words, any of the torture methods with which the words Guantanamo Bay have become synonymous can be achieved by remote, electronic means.
Instruments of Torture
Influence technology is also capable of persuading the subjects that their mind is being read, that their intellectual property is being plundered, and can even motivate suicide or the murder of family, friends, and co-workers. During the years of the so-called “War on Drugs” (which preceded the “War on Terrorism”), letters that the involuntary human subjects had written or were about to receive regularly vanished from the mail, as though the government had a huge covert operation through post offices across the country. When George Herbert Walker Bush became president (1989), the incidence of co-worker killings in the post offices became so great that the expression “going postal” began to replace the commonly used expression of “going crazy”. The killing of co-workers in other workplaces began to command more media attention, too.7
I estimate that the cost of imprisoning a human being in his/her own body and applying unremitting torture is US$5,000,000 to $10,000,000 a year.
By “unremitting torture” I mean exactly that. Because there is no visible evidence left by this new torture equipment such as damage to the skin, it is possible to torture the involuntary human subjects for 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. This can be done and is being done even on Christmas and Easter.8
I arrived at my estimate on the cost of testing/using electromagnetic weapons on a human subject by visiting a cable TV channel that specializes in the sale of goods over the air 24 hours a day. I questioned the number of technical staff required, their working hours and salary range; also the number of back-up personnel required to prepare the programming for broadcast. I did not inquire about the cost of electronics and the schedule by which it is depreciated. I have estimated a cost for depreciation that is included in my estimate of the cost of torturing one involuntary human subject for one year.
Torture is a labor-intensive business. What objective would justify this investment? Could it be something as insane as to rule the world by enslaving the democratic governments of the more populous countries? This objective is certainly consistent with the United States’ disdain for, and hostility toward, the United Nations, the international conventions and covenants it has ratified in the past and customary international law.9
On March 1, 2001, the Marine Corps announced a new non-lethal weapon, “active denial technology”. It produces enormous pain by allegedly boiling the molecules of water in the human skin without damaging the skin itself. As described in an article published in New Scientist, it employs pulsed electromagnetic radiation at a frequency of 95 GHz with a range of about 600 meters.10 There have been several new reports in the magazine in 2005, including one published in July,11 describing volunteers taking part in tests to determine how safe the Active Denial System (ADS) weapon would be if used in real crowd-control. The ADS weapon’s beam was reported to cause pain within 2 to 3 seconds, and becomes “intolerable after less than 5 seconds.”
Active denial technology is the cornerstone of the system employed to torture 2,000 persons in the privacy of their own homes, not only in the United States but around the world, wherever countries have signed Status of Forces Agreements with the United States.12 Allegations of torture were first received from countries with which the United States has a special intelligence-sharing relationship i.e. the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Then reports began to arrive from the conquered countries where the United States still has large numbers of troops stationed, i.e. Germany and Japan. When France rejoined the military arm of NATO in the late 90s, we began to receive allegations of torture in France. Very recently we have begun to receive allegations of torture from India, where American companies have begun to outsource, not only help lines, but also programming.13
And then there is the case of Russia, where the involuntary, human subjects of torture experiments appear to be both numerous and well-organized. I have been told reliably that every Russian scientist who could speak English has now found a home in an American university or government laboratory. This is plausible, considering the frequently voiced American worry that Soviet era experts in nuclear weaponry and biological warfare might find employment in Iran. It is a fact that at the end of World War II the U.S. Army swept through Germany in an operation called Project Paperclip, recruiting, in particular, Nazi rocket scientists and experts in aerospace medicine. Some other scientists were recruited simply to deprive the Soviet Union of this resource. So what has become of the Soviet scientists who didn’t speak English? In time we will find out for certain, but for now it is a safe guess that at least some of them have been employed to study the Russian value system and decision making processes by torturing other Russians with American “influence technology.”14
Two interesting and important articles on bioelectromagnetic weapons have recently appeared in the New Scientist: “Maximum pain is aim of new U.S. weapon” and “Police toy with ‘less lethal’ weapons”, both written by David Hambling15. See also U.S. Patent 6,536,440 of March 25, 2003.16 Since completing this article in mid-June 2005, it has come to my attention that the Israelis are deploying a device called “The Scream” which sends out bursts of audible but not loud sound at intervals of about 10 seconds. A photographer at the scene of a demonstration said that he continued to hear the sound ringing in his head even after he covered his ears. This suggests to me that the active agent is electromagnetic rather than acoustic. In other words, the Israelis have come up with a device that is far cleverer than our “active denial technology.” It not only deters rioters, but also issues an audible warning that it has been turned on, which the U.S. device does not, leaving it entirely to the enlisted men operating it to determine how much burning pain their adversaries receive. The margin for error with the U.S. device is unconscionable. It may as well be called a lethal weapon because in practice it very frequently will be.
best wishes and love lots
denny
V2K (Voice to Skull) Torture
For about 30 years, anti-personnel directed energy devices have been feasible that cause targeted individuals to hear voices (and other sounds) that other people near the targeted individuals cannot hear. The voices can be loud enough to be consciously audible, or so quiet that they have whatever effect they have subliminally. V2K weapons can inflict their effects upon their victims through solid brick and stone walls.
The United States of America's Army's "Military Thesaurus" defines "Voice to skull" (V2K) devices as follows:
"Voice to skull device is a Non-lethal weapon which includes (1) a neuro-electromagnetic device that uses microwave transmission of sound into the skull of persons or animals by way of pulse-modulated microwave radiation; and (2) a silent sound device which can transmit sound into the skull of persons or animals. NOTE: the sound modulation may be voice or audio subliminal messages. . Acronym: V2K".
V2K weapons fall within a class of weapons, those that “might enable any form of manipulation of human beings”, of which the European Parliament called for a worldwide ban, in 1999. For reasons of so-called “national security”, questions to the UK government remain unanswered, about the availability of such weapons to the public and private sectors nowadays..
The device - dubbed MEDUSA (Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio) - exploits the microwave audio effect, in which short microwave pulses rapidly heat tissue, causing a shockwave inside the skull that can be detected by the ears. A series of pulses can be transmitted to produce recognizable sounds.(Please note that, V2K Torture can be done with Neurophones also.)
These kinds of non-lethal weapons are often used in Mind Control, to produce a feeling of "gang-raping" a person's brain .....Some victim tries to describe his personal experience with Mind Control in this way ...
"Like a nail being slowly hammered the head gets beat. Beaten and beaten till you can't make it. Your brain is being destroyed, bit by bit. Noise in your ears seems to come from contact with microwaves. Implants that respond to microwaves.The RNA structure of your brain is being changed by microwaves, slowly but surely. The clever hypnotist has a hold of you like a wash rag. he'll ring you out till your used up! WELCOME TO HELL .."
Brain damage risk
James Lin of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at the University of Illinois in Chicago says that MEDUSA is feasible in principle.He has carried out his own work on the technique, and was even approached by the music industry about using microwave audio to enhance sound systems, he told New Scientist.
"But is it going to be possible at the power levels necessary?" he asks. Previous microwave audio tests involved very "quiet" sounds that were hard to hear, a high-power system would mean much more powerful - and potentially hazardous - shockwaves.
"I would worry about what other health effects it is having," says Lin. "You might see neural damage."
My Own Experience with this kind of torture
This is the most sophisticated form of "psychological murder" one can think of, and is used to threaten me criminally and to destroy my brain and nerves intentionally & completely to a vegetative state..To begin with, this was draconian violation of privacy, life and liberty,& in fact, in a nutshell, in one fell swoop, it criminally violates all human rights that a human being is entitled to.
Even though it sounds weird to the common people, it’s a fact that, I get tortured the most by faceless voices inside my head (and I'm not a psychiatric patient), that continuously negates & manipulate my thought process and weakens and exhausts my brain and nerves through remotely operated technologies as mentioned above. My mind is always a battlefield in here, and my brain just "gasps" every second to take a breath and it seems like that these are just suffocating my brain to “death”. I remain helplessly mentally handicapped in this condition. The perpetrators do it intentionally and increase the severity when it counts the most. They don’t even let me sleep at night. This pushes me towards acute depression, mental retardation and insanity almost. This is so intolerable that someone who has not gone through it can’t even imagine. This continuous torture on my brain & nerves may result in permanent insanity, brain embolism, cerebral hemorrhage etc.
Other Victim's Experiences: -
“Electromagnetic radiation communication of sound has been used against me 24/7 for three years and four months starting in February 2001 no matter where I am located. A key person involved is well known to me, so there are no mystery voices here.
It's interesting to note that this is pulsed which drops part of the frequency used down to the level of brain wave frequency which can be as a low as 10 Hertz.
The new UK TETRA system for police communications pulses at about 17 Hertz and is generating fears of what this will do to the brains of the officers using these mobile phones. Pulsing the high frequency microwave transmission allows multiple phone calls to be sent like packets on the Internet.
The basic high frequency drives the electromagnetic radiation deep into the brain while the pulsing of that transmission at the incredibly low rate matches the brain wave frequency which, I suspect, is what results in the ability to hear.
This could prove to be quite harmful and lethal in many instances. It's not exactly a "Non Lethal Weapon" and is an instrument of torture interrogation with lethal consequences from its usage. It is not being used for just scaring birds away.
Another Victim's Experience
Inhibition of thought: drowsiness, inability to recall words, or think incoherently are the most noticeable effects of thought inhibition. Perps block thoughts from surfacing by yanking me every time I show a tendency to "think." It's usually when the feeling you get that you know you're about to think out something. What happens when they do that to every thought that surface is that my brain can't focus and process anything that my senses receive. I can still try to process information, but then they will yank harder to distract me or bending my feet continuously when I still sit there and try to think. Apparently when the brain is not active, it starts to feel drownsy. They can only block the ability to recall word IF I'm not familiar with the word. I learn language much later so to remember the meaning of some of the word, sometimes I had to recall the words use in some situation. Apparently recalling some of the words using over and over again is much easier than some other, and distracting someone from remembering something that they already had trouble remember is easier than some other word that the brain is more familiar with. Zoning out helps the brain to recall events happened, therefore, sometimes they blink my eyes continuously to snap my brain into that state where my brain is restricted to the point where I can't think of everything else or recalling anything or making connection between the things I see with my eyes. Usually the brain can make an association when it sees a stimuli with something that is familiar with something it "sees" before (an example of this is that people usually claim :"you reminds me of someone I know.."). For every association, reacalling that the brain makes, they deliver pain (sharp pain) enough to make me sitting still not thinking up of anything for hours and hours. Apparently when you don't know, when your subject will passively recall facts to make a connection and tell the pattern, the best thing to do is to inhibit everything. Delivering pain after every thought however, may make the subject sitting still and blank. Somehow I still manage to write some things up here which implies distraction only work at a certain levels, it may weaken the signal but it does not quench it completely.
Surveillance: A Most Unreasonable Search and Seizure
Satellite surveillance is a most unreasonable search and seizure by totally invading the privacy of an individual as it "steals" everything it observes including all personal and private activities, documentation and anything which might be available in the private life of that individual. Furthermore, the surveillance activity can be used to shutdown and stop legitimate free exercise of rights and responsibilities by an individual by interfering with the very life and activity processes it purports to observe.
The worst aspect of surveillance activity is its perversion by an abuse of its power wherein it is used to create the very outcome which it purports to be objectively observing."
WHO gave you the right to sell data that isn't yours? You, the seller, and the buyer both do not have right over anything i own by virtue of the anti-fencing law.
Who gave you the right to distribute data that isn't yours and modify and twist it so you will have minions who will attack me as you are now doing?
It establishes proof that you are hacking into my accounts though and that you are prying and getting data and info you are not supposed to have knowledge of... and that you are instigating bullying and harassment.
THE GATE
On all fronts now. My family, the workers, the neighbors.
They are trying to provoke and push me and rile me up so they will have grounds to state that I am the one who's f***-up, they're not.
Mind-f***d , you mean?
Or raped?
Or both.
I will post what I still can on this research and contribute some details that may help in tracing this.
It's coming out, these WWII experiments are directly connected to the history of this place.
Key people:
Douglas MacArthur
Shiro Ishii
Key events:
Cointel PRO
Bay Of Pigs
Unit 731
What I found out (Filter. My research is being tampered with, my searched messed up and redirected. These need to be checked on sites that are secure. I have to ensure which details are rigged and which are not. I am trying every means I can to check different sources)
1. I found our about a military school that's appearing to be covert. Either it's designed to be this way or it's fake (made up by the ones redirecting my searches).
In case it is true. THIS IS A VERY IMPORTANT LINK.
I found it while looking for the proprietor of a land who dates 2 generations back, and whose land was entrusted to the very family he also asked to stay in his land.
The family name is spanish, not a common name, only few results will come up when you do a search on it.
One of the names that came out studied in the above mentioned military school.
When i looked for his photo, he looked so much like my uncle.
what started off was war against war
terroism,there should be no more,
electronic weapons that can make you die
the world we live, tells many lies
conspiracy theorys
corruption too
your on your own
but to fight we shall do
now targets are animals,now humans too,
what once was freedom,has gone thats true
now the days are dark with fear
we struggle to survive
but we are still here
experiments and control
they have that much power
minute by minute and hr by hr
this torture is so cruel and drives you insane
why could a person
deserve this much pain
expose the weak
power and greed
we shall continue this fight
till we are all freed!
peace!!
best wishes n love lots
denny
Microwave torture, war crime against targeted individuals and inmates

... there have been such powerful (electronic) weapons that can be used to monitor, incapacitate, torture and murder, all without evidence. The ones owning and exploiting this technology will rule the world if we do not stop them, not tomorrow but NOW . ~ Peter Mooring, Human Rights Reporter
______________________________________________________________________________
The lethal laser gun, a "People Cooker" used to torture and kill innocent Iraqis and innocent Targeted Individuals is now ready to aim at Los Angeles inmates, 75% of whom have committed no crime. ACLU of Southern California sent a letter to Sheriff Baca and asks the public to join it in demanding that the "Pain Ray Gun" will not be used in country jails, raising questions about why ACLU has not filed suit for planned torture and war crimes using the weapon. This weapon is lethal and is a torture weapon according to ACLU, although given the misnomer, "Non-lethal weapon."
Los Angeles County Jail is to be first of U.S. prisons to use the Assault Intervention Device (A.I.D.), a 7 ½ foot tall military grade weapon to microwave inmates, what Los Angeles Truth Movement head, Chuck Noyes identifies as a war crime. This is one of many new weapons that can be used to torture and kill Americans in Obama's authorized targeted killings of Americans program. (See: Directed Energy Weapons aimed at American targets: Learning opportunity, Examiner)
This and similar weaponry causing "intolerable heat" are used remotely on many Targeted Individuals (TIs) who have alleged for years that they are being tortured with remote weaponry, their reports dismissed by family and professionals, including their local police, most of whom call he victims "delusional."
An estimated hundreds of thousands of innocent American civilians are collateral damage in the U.S. led so-called "war on terrorism," actually a war of terror against innocent men, women and children, including America's "greatest people," Most of these targets are not in traditional prisons but suffer crippling and deadly effects of the well-hidden form of state-sponsored terrorism and targeted killings sweeping American communities, invading homes as invisible prisons targeted with high-tech weaponry. Interconnected contracted extremists keep targets under covert surveillance and assault them with weapons including Directed Energy Weapons and psychological warfare. (See: Targeted man wants investigation of corrupt 'security' program and hi-tech weapons)
Th Pain Ray is only one among an arsenal of the most feared, controversial and best hidden weapons of modern age. They are designed to incapacitate, torture and assassinate. From the Netherlands, Peter Mooring, who reports on human rights violations of the secret service and calls the new weapon a "People Cooker, writes:
Probably the most horrible consequence of these (electronic) weapons based on radio waves is that you can NOT protect yourself, your children, your loved ones anymore. You can no longer say: stay in this room, you are safe here. Attackers simply look and cook/burn through walls, with intensities that can be deadly. Police cannot protect you, security services cannot protect you. That is why these weapons must be banned, not tomorrow but NOW .
The ACLU and Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) have filed a lawsuit challenging government's asserted authority for "targeted killings” of U.S. citizens far from armed conflict zones.
Why is ACLU not filing another lawsuit against Raytheon and the government for planning to commit torture and war crimes with military grade weaponry? asked Los Angeles Truth Movement coordinator, Chuck Noyes.
Noyes stated this morning, "ACLU should be filing a lawsuit against the companies and government agencies involved because this is a war crime, a military grade weapon used on Americans."
The ACLU Southern California attorney was unable to immediately answer the writer's call about this.
After the Los Angeles 911 event, Noyes plans to start "No Fry Zone," a new campaign to ban energy weapons.
ACLU of Southern California's letter to Sheriff Baca demands assurance that he will never use the high power microwave device against the inmates of Los Angeles County Jails – of whom 70% have not been convicted of a crime but are there awaiting trial or other procedures.
The public is urged to join ACLU/SC in asking Sheriff Baca not to deploy this military weapon intended to cause intolerable pain — and capable of causing lethal injury when used for crowd control — against jail inmates.
Sheriff Lee Baca unveiled this giant robot-like device noting that it will "allow us to quickly intervene without having to enter the area and without incapacitating or injuring either combatant."
Not true says the ACLU/SC Take Action Team:
"While this “Pain Ray” device was being tested by the Air Force, a miscalibration of its power settings caused five airmen in its path to suffer lasting burns, including one whose injuries were so severe that he was airlifted to an off-base burn treatment center.
"It is all the more disturbing that the use of the Pain Ray is being entrusted to the deputies of L.A. County Jail, with its long-troubled history of deputy violence, retaliation and abuse against inmates.
The ray gun shoots blasts of heat energy at prisoners that penetrate beneath the skin to the pain receptacles reports Times NewsFeed.
ACLU attorney told Associated Press that the device is "a weapon that can cause serious injury that is being put into a place where there is a long history of abuse of prisoners."
On September 2, 2010, Dupré reported:
"Since the 2001 September 11 attacks and Bush's so-called "war on terror," there was a soar in number of Targeted Individuals reporting covert assaults by black operatives, thugs, extremist cells, "stalkers." Some TIs are reporting assaults with remotely applied, military grade, lethal weaponry. These reports have been from both overseas and U.S. self-identified targets. In early August, Sharon Weinberger explained the reason for the escalated reports:
"After the attacks of September 11, the Pentagon began a shift away from its late Cold War–era 'two-war strategy,' premised on maintaining the ability to conduct two major military operations simultaneously, and began to focus instead on irregular warfare against individuals and groups." (Emphasis added; Sharon Weinberger, Black Ops: Secret Military Technology in the Age of Terrorism, August 3, 2010)"
In an exclusive interview with Targeted Individual, Robert Wood, he told the writer, “I’m not a criminal. I’m not a terrorist. I’ve been charged with no crime, nor am I connected to anyone who is, to my knowledge....Considering severity of these crimes, it's a wonder anyone survives at all. There is almost complete secrecy surrounding this horrendous situation.” (See: Dupre, D. Human Target, Examiner, January 29, 2010)
Following that interview, Targeted Individuals from the U.S. and abroad sent a steady stream of comments and emails conveying the same that Robin Webster wrote, "Exactly. Almost word for word what has happened to me. Excellent article because it captures the both the horror and the process that a TI goes through as they gradually awake to a destiny not of their choosing."
In February, the writer reported on the The High Energy Laser Joint Technology Office co-sponsoring the partially secret 2010 Directed Energy Professional Society Directed Energy Symposium in Monterrey, California, some of which was held behind closed doors. (See: Directed Energy Weapons aimed at American targets: Learning opportunity)
Until the recent lawsuit that CCR and ACLU filed, challenging Obama's targeted killings authority, innocent civilians on the government hit-list had been publicly unrecognized by major organizations, health workers and media. (See: Dupre, D. APA's CIA torture complicity. Is American ready for the whole truth?, Examiner, August 14, 2010)
Each passing week, TIs consistently reporting remotely applied weaponry burn marks on their person and belongings plus psychological war weapon effects, appear less "delusional" than those re-victimizing them with such name-calling, even institutionalizing some of them, without investigating high-tech weaponry effects and the government programs designed to persecute, torture and kill them.
If the reader knows a Targeted Individual, rather than shun or possibly even follow secret orders against the person, the U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Human Rights, reach out to hold his or her hand, listen to his or her horror stories, and stand with them. It is past time to compassionately reach out to these broken people and together, work to end the evil government persecution, torture and assassination program and its equally evil new weapons with invisible ammunition.
Copyright © 2010 Deborah Dupré. All rights reserved. This article cannot be copied, posted, emailed, or republished without author permission.
The author grants permission to copy this article title and first paragraph only - linked to this Examiner page.
Deborah Dupré, with post-graduate science and education degrees from U.S. and Australian universities, has been a human and environmental rights advocate for over 25 years in the U.S., Vanuatu and Australia. Support her work by subscribing to her articles and forwarding the link of this article to friends and colleagues or reposting only the title and first paragraph linked to this Examiner page. Dupre welcomes emails: info@DeborahDupre.com See her Vaccine Liberty or Death book plus Compassion Film Project DVDs.
Learn more by doing: The ACLU was founded to defend and secure rights granted by the Bill of Rights. Since 1923, the ACLU of Southern California has been on the leading edge of liberty. Join ACLU by making your voice heard today: Tell Sheriff Baca "No, Thanks" to this horrible device.
Related articles by this Examiner