Blogs

• 

  Mojmir signed the petition|about 5 hours ago

  Member of Congress: Investigate misuse of Psychotronic (mind control) weapons
• 

  Mojmir signed the petition|2 days ago

  naciones unidas todos los gobiernos del mundo: no........a la agresion a la especie humana
• 

  Mojmir recruited Marika to sign the petition|8 days ago

  Congres of the United States of America: enact the law baning remote control of human nervous system
• 

  Mojmir signed the petition |8 days ago

  Congres of the United States of America: enact the law baning remote control of human nervous system
• 

  Mojmir started the petition|8 days ago

  Congres of the United States of America: enact the law baning remote control of human nervous system

http://www.petitions24.com/ban_remote_control_of_human_beings_by_technical_means

I'm being grateful and appreciative for what I have right now. I don't want to complain and rant anymore because it's draining all my energy and I don't want to feed that negative force. Anticipating my day of freedom where I am no longer caged like an animal at a zoo. Days are going by so quickly that I can't believe we're halfway through 2012. I wish I can fast forward to Dec.21 to see what will happen. Is it another Y2K or is the Mayan Prophecies true? Who knows really? Perhaps the Aliens ? Earth changes, galactic alignment, Solar Flares, or Planet X.  . I have a hunch that sh*t will hit the fan before that date. I hope i'm wrong but let's watch and see.

Obama wants to microchip everyone

Here we are as Nancy Pelosi said, let’s just vote on the Healthcare bill and THEN we can see what’s in it! Well Nancy, you got your bill passed, and now we are getting to see what the democrats jammed into it, and I for one am NOT happy.

H.R. 3200 was the bill the senate passed, then the House had to do their amendments to get a final vote, that bill is H.R. 3962, now mind you that H.R. 3962 is ONLY additional amendments to H.R. 3200 not a total replacement . With that being said, unless a specific area was amended, the wording of H.R 3200 stands.

Now for the wording:

Required RFID implanted chip
Sec. 2521, Pg. 1000 – The government will establish a National Medical Device Registry. What does a National Medical Device Registry mean?
National Medical Device Registry from H.R. 3200 [Healthcare Bill], pages 1001-1008:
(g)(1) The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that— ‘‘(A) is or has been used in or on a patient; ‘‘(B)and is— ‘‘(i) a class III device; or ‘‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.”
Then we go to page 1004 to describe what the actual term “data” means
section B:
‘‘(B) In this paragraph, the term ‘data’ refers to information respecting a device described in paragraph (1), including claims data, patient survey data, standardized analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of data from disparate data environments, electronic health records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the Secretary”
What exactly is a class II implantable device? The FDA says it is an “implantable radio frequency transponder system for patient identification and health information.” The purpose of a class II device is to collect data in medical patients such as “claims data, patient survey data, standardized analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of data from disparate data environments, electronic health records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the Secretary.”

The last part is scary in itself; there are a lot of questions unanswered, such as ……if the data includes “claims data” who updates the information and when? What exactly is a “disparate data environment?” And the biggest question is….will this transponder include a GPS capability?

Don’t believe me? Check out the government site and judge for yourself
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm072191.pdf

Don’t believe it’s in the bill? Look it up for yourself
http://waysandmeans.house.gov/media/pdf/111/AAHCA09001xml.pdf

The areas to look at are pages 1001-1008 listed as “National Medical Device Registry”
Then page 1006 where it stated that this be enacted 36 months of passage
Now go back to page 505 where it refers to the implantable device as “medical device surveillance”

The word surveillance alone speaks to something far more ominous than just claims data
The FDA has said that the recent claims of tumors in dogs who have been chipped are the research responsibility of the implant manufacturers and not that of the FDA because the implants are not considered a drug. So the policing of medical research is left solely to the makers.

America has just become the world’s first country to require micro chipping of all its citizens, and Nancy Pelosi wanted us to follow her in blind trust in passage of this bill, now that we see what is in it, what can we do about it?

Applied Digital Solutions already have the GPS patent on implantable chip technology
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Applied_Digital_Solutions

Here is a video explaining this technology

In a legal sense, there isn't too much that can be done. You could change your venue, relocate or move to avoid the harasser but this isn't usually a practical method for a variety of reasons.
For starters, the best thing to do is give us a call from a secure phone. We will conduct a sweep of the suspect areas to locate the source of the suspected harassment and then assist in a course of action to stop the harassment.
Natural obstacles are cheap and effective in blocking most X-rays and microwave or RF (could be a radar gun) signals that a harasser might use. Mountains, caves, desert areas, and large lakes or oceans offer excellent protection and can block or distort most forms of electronic harassment.
Shielding signals with Passive or Active shielding can be an effective measure.
If harassment is general to an area and not specifically directed to you, simply moving to another location is the easiest method to stop the harassment. If the harassment is specific to you, then you'll need to employ some sort of shield or cover, such as mountains or a cave. Shielding may be your only alternative to stop the harassment if you cannot employ natural obstacles or shields. Passive shielding is less expensive then Active shielding and consists of special metal materials designed to block high frequency RF energy, X-rays, etc. Active shielding uses sophisticated electronic equipment to jam, capture, redirect, distort or nullify the harmful energy.

It isn't legal for a private individual, a company or a corporation to use electronic harassment on you. The military and law enforcement, however, can use non-lethal weapons (see USC Title 50 Chapter 32 Section 1520a).
Further, testing of electronic equipment; discovering unauthorized electronic surveillance; training of intelligence personnel by officers the United States is allowed.
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/50/1805.html
Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, officers, employees, or agents of the United States are authorized in the normal course of their official duties to conduct electronic surveillance not targeted against the communications of any particular person or persons, under procedures approved by the Attorney General.

Advanced Electronic Security Co. is an experienced and knowledgeable professional private investigative agency with the ability to find and then help you to eliminate Electronic Harassment. Advanced Electronic Security Co. is also a specialist in electronic surveillance and counter-surveillance. We only utilize the best and latest technology and techniques to assist and support victims of Electronic Harassment.

323-462-1351 - Los Angeles
760-668-2245 - Cell Phone

E-mail us
Over 30 years of specialized service
over 2,500 locations swept.
PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT US
FROM A SUSPECT TELEPHONE OR FACILITY
WHEN INQUIRING ABOUT BUG SWEEPING OR OUR
SERVICES AND SURVEYS.

http://www.bugsweeps.com/info/electronic_harassment.html

USC › Title 50 › Chapter 36 › Subchapter I › § 1805
PREVNEXT
50 USC § 1805 - ISSUANCE OF ORDER

There are 4 Updates Pending. Select the tab below to view.
USC-prelim
US Code
Notes
Updates

This preliminary release may be subject to further revision before it is released again as a final version. As with other online versions of the Code, the U.S. Code Classification Tables should be consulted for the latest laws affecting the Code. Those using the USCPrelim should verify the text against the printed slip laws available from GPO (Government Printing Office), the laws as shown on THOMAS (a legislative service of the Library of Congress), and the final version of the Code when it becomes available.

Current through Pub. L. 112-131. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)

(a) Necessary findings
Upon an application made pursuant to section 1804 of this title, the judge shall enter an ex parte order as requested or as modified approving the electronic surveillance if he finds that—
(1) the application has been made by a Federal officer and approved by the Attorney General;
(2) on the basis of the facts submitted by the applicant there is probable cause to believe that—
(A) the target of the electronic surveillance is a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power: Provided, That no United States person may be considered a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power solely upon the basis of activities protected by the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and
(B) each of the facilities or places at which the electronic surveillance is directed is being used, or is about to be used, by a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power;
(3) the proposed minimization procedures meet the definition of minimization procedures under section 1801 (h) of this title; and
(4) the application which has been filed contains all statements and certifications required by section 1804 of this title and, if the target is a United States person, the certification or certifications are not clearly erroneous on the basis of the statement made under section 1804 (a)(7)(E) [1] of this title and any other information furnished under section 1804 (d) [1] of this title.
(b) Determination of probable cause
In determining whether or not probable cause exists for purposes of an order under subsection (a)(2) of this section, a judge may consider past activities of the target, as well as facts and circumstances relating to current or future activities of the target.
(c) Specifications and directions of orders
(1) Specifications
An order approving an electronic surveillance under this section shall specify—
(A) the identity, if known, or a description of the specific target of the electronic surveillance identified or described in the application pursuant to section 1804 (a)(3) of this title;
(B) the nature and location of each of the facilities or places at which the electronic surveillance will be directed, if known;
(C) the type of information sought to be acquired and the type of communications or activities to be subjected to the surveillance;
(D) the means by which the electronic surveillance will be effected and whether physical entry will be used to effect the surveillance; and
(E) the period of time during which the electronic surveillance is approved.
(2) Directions
An order approving an electronic surveillance under this section shall direct—
(A) that the minimization procedures be followed;
(B) that, upon the request of the applicant, a specified communication or other common carrier, landlord, custodian, or other specified person, or in circumstances where the Court finds, based upon specific facts provided in the application, that the actions of the target of the application may have the effect of thwarting the identification of a specified person, such other persons, furnish the applicant forthwith all information, facilities, or technical assistance necessary to accomplish the electronic surveillance in such a manner as will protect its secrecy and produce a minimum of interference with the services that such carrier, landlord, custodian, or other person is providing that target of electronic surveillance;
(C) that such carrier, landlord, custodian, or other person maintain under security procedures approved by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence any records concerning the surveillance or the aid furnished that such person wishes to retain; and
(D) that the applicant compensate, at the prevailing rate, such carrier, landlord, custodian, or other person for furnishing such aid.
(3) Special directions for certain orders
An order approving an electronic surveillance under this section in circumstances where the nature and location of each of the facilities or places at which the surveillance will be directed is unknown shall direct the applicant to provide notice to the court within ten days after the date on which surveillance begins to be directed at any new facility or place, unless the court finds good cause to justify a longer period of up to 60 days, of—
(A) the nature and location of each new facility or place at which the electronic surveillance is directed;
(B) the facts and circumstances relied upon by the applicant to justify the applicant’s belief that each new facility or place at which the electronic surveillance is directed is or was being used, or is about to be used, by the target of the surveillance;
(C) a statement of any proposed minimization procedures that differ from those contained in the original application or order, that may be necessitated by a change in the facility or place at which the electronic surveillance is directed; and
(D) the total number of electronic surveillances that have been or are being conducted under the authority of the order.
(d) Duration of order; extensions; review of circumstances under which information was acquired, retained or disseminated
(1) An order issued under this section may approve an electronic surveillance for the period necessary to achieve its purpose, or for ninety days, whichever is less, except that
(A) an order under this section shall approve an electronic surveillance targeted against a foreign power, as defined in section 1801 (a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title, for the period specified in the application or for one year, whichever is less, and
(B) an order under this chapter for a surveillance targeted against an agent of a foreign power who is not a United States person may be for the period specified in the application or for 120 days, whichever is less.
(2) Extensions of an order issued under this subchapter may be granted on the same basis as an original order upon an application for an extension and new findings made in the same manner as required for an original order, except that
(A) an extension of an order under this chapter for a surveillance targeted against a foreign power, as defined in paragraph (5), (6), or (7) of section 1801 (a) of this title, or against a foreign power as defined in section 1801 (a)(4) of this title that is not a United States person, may be for a period not to exceed one year if the judge finds probable cause to believe that no communication of any individual United States person will be acquired during the period, and
(B) an extension of an order under this chapter for a surveillance targeted against an agent of a foreign power who is not a United States person may be for a period not to exceed 1 year.
(3) At or before the end of the period of time for which electronic surveillance is approved by an order or an extension, the judge may assess compliance with the minimization procedures by reviewing the circumstances under which information concerning United States persons was acquired, retained, or disseminated.
(e) Emergency orders
(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, the Attorney General may authorize the emergency employment of electronic surveillance if the Attorney General—
(A) reasonably determines that an emergency situation exists with respect to the employment of electronic surveillance to obtain foreign intelligence information before an order authorizing such surveillance can with due diligence be obtained;
(B) reasonably determines that the factual basis for the issuance of an order under this subchapter to approve such electronic surveillance exists;
(C) informs, either personally or through a designee, a judge having jurisdiction under section 1803 of this title at the time of such authorization that the decision has been made to employ emergency electronic surveillance; and
(D) makes an application in accordance with this subchapter to a judge having jurisdiction under section 1803 of this title as soon as practicable, but not later than 7 days after the Attorney General authorizes such surveillance.
(2) If the Attorney General authorizes the emergency employment of electronic surveillance under paragraph (1), the Attorney General shall require that the minimization procedures required by this subchapter for the issuance of a judicial order be followed.
(3) In the absence of a judicial order approving such electronic surveillance, the surveillance shall terminate when the information sought is obtained, when the application for the order is denied, or after the expiration of 7 days from the time of authorization by the Attorney General, whichever is earliest.
(4) A denial of the application made under this subsection may be reviewed as provided in section 1803 of this title.
(5) In the event that such application for approval is denied, or in any other case where the electronic surveillance is terminated and no order is issued approving the surveillance, no information obtained or evidence derived from such surveillance shall be received in evidence or otherwise disclosed in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, office, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the United States, a State, or political subdivision thereof, and no information concerning any United States person acquired from such surveillance shall subsequently be used or disclosed in any other manner by Federal officers or employees without the consent of such person, except with the approval of the Attorney General if the information indicates a threat of death or serious bodily harm to any person.
(6) The Attorney General shall assess compliance with the requirements of paragraph (5).
(f) Testing of electronic equipment; discovering unauthorized electronic surveillance; training of intelligence personnel
Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, officers, employees, or agents of the United States are authorized in the normal course of their official duties to conduct electronic surveillance not targeted against the communications of any particular person or persons, under procedures approved by the Attorney General, solely to—
(1) test the capability of electronic equipment, if—
(A) it is not reasonable to obtain the consent of the persons incidentally subjected to the surveillance;
(B) the test is limited in extent and duration to that necessary to determine the capability of the equipment;
(C) the contents of any communication acquired are retained and used only for the purpose of determining the capability of the equipment, are disclosed only to test personnel, and are destroyed before or immediately upon completion of the test; and:
(D) Provided, That the test may exceed ninety days only with the prior approval of the Attorney General;
(2) determine the existence and capability of electronic surveillance equipment being used by persons not authorized to conduct electronic surveillance, if—
(A) it is not reasonable to obtain the consent of persons incidentally subjected to the surveillance;
(B) such electronic surveillance is limited in extent and duration to that necessary to determine the existence and capability of such equipment; and
(C) any information acquired by such surveillance is used only to enforce chapter 119 of title 18, or section 605 of title 47, or to protect information from unauthorized surveillance; or
(3) train intelligence personnel in the use of electronic surveillance equipment, if—
(A) it is not reasonable to—
(i) obtain the consent of the persons incidentally subjected to the surveillance;
(ii) train persons in the course of surveillances otherwise authorized by this subchapter; or
(iii) train persons in the use of such equipment without engaging in electronic surveillance;
(B) such electronic surveillance is limited in extent and duration to that necessary to train the personnel in the use of the equipment; and
(C) no contents of any communication acquired are retained or disseminated for any purpose, but are destroyed as soon as reasonably possible.
(g) Retention of certifications, applications and orders
Certifications made by the Attorney General pursuant to section 1802 (a) of this title and applications made and orders granted under this subchapter shall be retained for a period of at least ten years from the date of the certification or application.
(h) Bar to legal action
No cause of action shall lie in any court against any provider of a wire or electronic communication service, landlord, custodian, or other person (including any officer, employee, agent, or other specified person thereof) that furnishes any information, facilities, or technical assistance in accordance with a court order or request for emergency assistance under this chapter for electronic surveillance or physical search.
(i) Pen registers and trap and trace devices
In any case in which the Government makes an application to a judge under this subchapter to conduct electronic surveillance involving communications and the judge grants such application, upon the request of the applicant, the judge shall also authorize the installation and use of pen registers and trap and trace devices, and direct the disclosure of the information set forth in section 1842 (d)(2) of this title.

Pray.

Filter.

Pray.

Remember, the wolves will always be where the sheeps are.

And as we've always been reminded, there are wolves in sheep's clothing.

Pray.

Filter.

Pray.

The main perps? You would never think them capable of such illegal acts.

Their demeanor? You would not think them capable of such cruelty.

Pray.

Filter.

Pray.

God will separate the chaff from the grain.

http://www.avaaz.org/en/petition/Law_prohibiting_electromagnetic_and_mind_control_weapons_in_Europe/

http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.change.org%2Fpetitions%2Fcongres-of-the-united-states-of-america-enact-the-law-baning-remote-control-of-human-nervous-system%3Fshare_id%3DdwKmqnoeZV%26utm_campaign%3Dfriend_inviter_action_box%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook%26utm_source%3Dshare_petition%26utm_term%3D20598078&h=VAQEH6U2mAQH0APLf1TKQopAJdqRyV5CNY3iZHeHJMn20Ng

Enter The Dragon

I believe I need to beat some sense into my perps. I'm getting unfair punishment for no apparent reason. Using me as a human guinea pig. It's time for an eye for an eye. I believe in fairness and what they have done to me is so cowardly and dishonorable that if I let it slide they will pick on someone else. Sometimes violence is the only solution. Teach a lesson on respect and courtesy. I wouldn't want my family and friends to go through the Hell I've been experiencing. Here to draw the line and if you cross my personal boundaries I will fight back! 

James Walbert

Board of Directors at Stalking Victims Network
Wichita, Kansas Area Civic & Social Organization
Court Recognizes Electronic Harassment:

James Walbert is a victim of non-consensual RFID  implantation.  He has testified in in Washington D.C. in front of the Presidential Commission on Bioethical issues appointed by President Obahma.He is one of the few who obtained a “Protection Order” for James Walbert.

December 30, 2008 This could be the first official recognition of the need to protect citizens against electronic harassment. This is actually very impressive. Walbert persuaded the Court that the defendant was using electronic weapons against him and his family, in addition to resorting to obvious forms of stalking.

James Walbert

He substantiated his claim with DoD documentation and had the support of a security specialist, who proved that electronic frequencies were involved, and, it would appear, the support of a couple of police officers. He also made use of letters from Missouri Representative, Jim Guest.

The outcome: The defendant failed to show up in court. The defendant has to pay all legal fees. The defendant may not employ 3rd-party means of re-establishing contact with Walbert (which would constitute multiple stalking), and may not employ any form of “electronic means” in harassing Walbert.

Walbert filed his complaint on November 25, 2008. The court decided the case on December 30, 2008.

Although this will probably not protect Walbert in the long term, he has obtained the first court-based acknowledgement of the existence of electronic weapons and of electronic harassment, that I know of.

A few minutes of the  Dr. Barrie Trower Interview conducted by Lars Drudgaard was also played on the show today: 

Today it is not uncommon to hear stories in the media on how professional athletes are using performance enhancing drugs.   If an Olympian is caught “doping”, they are banned from competition and then subsequently stripped of any titles or medals they have won.   What if today, a technology existed that could remotely affect the performance of an athlete?  What if an athlete could be remotely influenced to lose or win a competition?  Could this be possible? If so how is this possible? By what methods, what means?

“ICAACT.ORG had the honor and privilege to interview Dr. Barry Trower.  Today we will hear disturbing testimony by one of the world’s premiere experts in Micro-Wave Technologies and Micro Wave frequencies.   We will hear details on how his expertise was solicited by a government of a country because its politicians and Olympic team were being targeted with this type of technology.  Dr. Barry Trower is a retired military scientist and physicist who has made it his mission to educate and warn the public on the dangers that are affecting unsuspecting victims on a daily basis.  He will further detail what horrible effects we will succumb to if we do not band together and stop these atrocities.”

~Lars Drudgaard

Dr. Barrie Trower

To listen to the entire Barrie Trower Olympic  Interview conducted  by Lars Drudgaard, click here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gx4tT_NbRLQ&feature=youtu.be

Please contact either Mr. Jesse Beltran or Lars Drudgaard if you have any questions about your own personal saftey.

ICAACT

www.icaact.org

International CenterAgainst Abuse of Covert Technologies

Lars Drudgaard ICAACT.org

Mr. Jesse Beltran ICAACT.org

Please contact either Mr. Jesse Beltran or Lars Drudgaard if you have any questions about your own personal saftey.

ICAACT

www.icaact.org

International CenterAgainst Abuse of Covert Technologies

http://www.pakalertpress.com/2012/06/22/haarp-and-the-tesla-connection/

 The rights went from the Creator, to the People, to the founding documents, to their government.  But today, they seem to think that rights come from their government, and that their government can grant or take away rights on a whim.  Never mind that it encroaches on those rights willy-nilly, because repeated treason can never make it lawful even when it becomes commonplace.

United States is the supreme law of the land, and any statue, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail.

...

A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one.

An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law.

Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby."

- Sixteenth American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Section 177

"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution, are null and void."

- Chief Justice Marshall, Marbury v. Madison

"The State cannot diminish rights of the people." - Hurtado v. California

"Our Bill of Rights curbs all three branches of government. It subjects all departments of government to a rule of law and sets boundaries beyond which no official may go. It emphasizes that in this country man walks with dignity and without fear, that he need not grovel before an all powerful government."

- Justice William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court.

Is the Illuminati real? Is our world really run by the so called Elites? Their ultimate goal of depopulation and microchipped population? I honestly think so and here is my reasoning for this. They flouridate our water supplies, all the food is contaminated, the chemtrails in the air is another sign. The Fukushima disaster was deliberate in thinning out the population. They keep people distracted and busy by the mass media and deliberately dumb downing society so they don't question their reality. I feel like that movie called "They Live"

You gotta ask smart questions and do some critical thinking. They are crashing economies and getting geared up for World War 3. Striking Iran or whatever to trigger global death and destruction. They are running out of time and they know it. Why are there seed vaults? What about these so called Deep Underground Military Bases ? Fema camps and coffins. I swear to God it just doesn't add up. Think for yourself and do your own research. Plenty of experts out there that knows what they are talking about.

I cannot think.  I cannot remember.  I cannot choose. I cannot feel.

These things have been taken from me.  This is not life anymore.

What reason could someone possibly have to go on in such a state?

I can find none.

The world is filled with psychopaths united in a hivemind.  They destroy and control my mind for their amusement.  I cannot endure this.  They mock God and Jesus, the only hope in my life.

The Beast is here, Satan is ruling,  this tribulation is like nothing I could have ever expected.  My will to live has failed already multiple times, suicide attempts, constant thoughts of suicide before my ability to think and remember was taken from me.

Can you comprehend the horror of waking up each day not knowing who or where you are?  I have to have them "update" me on who I am and where I am all while they taunt me. 

Who could possibly enjoy this psychopathic reality?  Only a psychopath.  I am not a psychopath.  So what am I to do?

When I first got attacked mentally I didn't know what to do. My brain was on fire and body hacked and I had to go see my doctor who introduced me to a psychiatrist. That was the first mistake I made. Now since I have a mental health issue everyone dismisses me as crazy. The psychiatrist and doctors cannot help you and all they can do is feed you drugs to make you into a zombie. If I saw a specialist in the field of T.I.'s right from the beginnning then I would have a different story. Checking for implants, or whatever the Hell is wrong with my brain and body. Oh well if you are reading this then learn from my mistakes. Do not repeat what I went through because it's been 8 years of zombie hell from these so called professionals. The doctors these days just aren't into helping patients because they work directly for the big pharmacies. They are nothing more than legit drug dealers. I would become a specialist in medicine and help out T.I.'s however I can't because my brain hurts physically and mentally. The perps have completely disabled me. 

http://gangstalkingsurfers.wordpress.com/2012/02/02/53/