All Posts (12225)

Sort by
I assisted in typing and editing the VAMTEC LLC powerpoitnt presentation for William J Rigby- I was told it was for fertilizer and increase yield of produce. Instead it contaminates the food supply.Please forgive me world- I was told it was for FERTILIZER. William J Rigby threatened my fathers life and then he killed him through the US health system.Vamtech LLC developed the Mycorrhizal fungi growth. June18VAM.ppt, 8.4 MB PlantHealthCare lettr to Rutherford.doc, 34 KB board_of_directors.docWhat lies at the root of Morgellon's is a type of fungus. More specifically a fungus related to Mycorrhizal fungiWhat lies at the root of Morgellon's is a type of fungus. More specifically a fungus related to Mycorrhizal fungi(en.wikipedia.org...). Mycorrhizal fungi are symbiotic partners with 80% of plant species. In a nutshell, the fungi attach atthe roots and facilitate nutrient absorbtion (sp?) in exchange for carbohydrates (e.g. glucose and sucrose). This partnership benefits both partieswithout any significant negative effects (I'm sure with a few exceptions).

I'm positing that Morgellon's is a fast mutating, Mycorrhial type fungi attempting to form a symbiotic relationship with humans. The key to thisprocess is to exist within the human body without causing harm and without alerting the immune system. No small feat. Ultimately the fungal systemwill exist as sort of a second nervous system. What is termed Morgellon's is primarily the erradication of fungal cells that for one reason oranother aren't working - i.e. damaging the person's body or activating the immune system. If a given sore is open and active (i.e. infected), ifsubmerged in isopropyl alcohol, the alcohol will draw the offending fungi from the sore - a black sinewy substance/strands. As I will explain later,this is not the only function of the sores.

There are other pointers... One of the many primary symptoms is a periodic, intense craving for sweets. This would align with providing thecarbohydrates the fungi needs (and receives from the relationship) for sustenance.

Mycorrhial fungi often will attract and kill springtails as a source of nitrogen - for itself and the plant. I believe it is this type of mechanismthat is occurring and attracting other organisms resulting in the confusing cross-infection appearance of Morgellon's. This is one of theadditional functions of the sores (i.e. the attraction of specific other organisms as nutrient sources). This process is a small portion of thevitamin/mineral absorption assistance the fungi will provide.

Also occurring at the sores is the alteration of RNA and subsequent DNA as a corrective response to the offending cells being eradicated from thesystem. I am not knowledgeable with regards to genetics and such or how such a mechanism might work. So I'm gonna skip faking it. However, thereare specific details regarding the sores' process that support them being a part of fungal development and production. (concentration is at apremium...)

Additional connections and evidence: basically the dysfunctional symptoms of Morgellon's (e.g. brain fog, various digestive, etc...) are the resultof improper fungal cells being introduced into that area of the body (brain, intestines, etc. respectively) and then corrected.

So the fungi are getting a stable existence out of the symbiosis, what are the people getting? Once the process is complete (up to 10 years) theperson will have enhanced water, vitamin, and mineral absorption, heightened intelligence, expanded perception (mild cross-dimensional and telepathiccommunicative abilities), strengthened immune response, extended life-expectancy, likely among others.

Brain is tired. Well, what do you think?


copyright & usage
Click here for more ATS Skunk Works topics
Hot Topics|Top Topics|This Week|Subscribe|Home


reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 01:23 PM by prevenge


very interesting.

see the 2012 link in my signature for some extra goodies.

-



copyright & usage
0.gif


reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 03:14 PM by Kruel


Very interesting indeed. I'll be keeping tabs on this possibility. It seems more likely an explanation for morgellon's than a nanotech infection.

If this is the case, then I hope a harmonious symbiotic relationship can be found between fungi and human biology. It may be quite an "upgrade",just as long as I don't have to deal with mushrooms sprouting from my skin!



copyright & usage
0.gif


reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 06:55 PM by verbal kint


reply to post by Kruel



your comment about mushrooms sprouting from your skin reminded me of this:



YouTube Link

Read more…

joining

please relate our social network called loversvillage,place with many people on the world where u can use international language to relate 0r chat each other. u can type in the address bar as http://www.loversvillage.ning.com. i will hope to be lucky for joining.my gmail account is zawtheinhtut@gmail.commy yahoo account is zawtheinhtut@yahoo.com
Read more…
--- On Fri, 8/7/09, Ron Angell wrote:STATE SECRET PROTECTION ACT OF 2009From: Ron AngellSubject: STATE SECRET PROTECTION ACT OF 2009To: constitutionalsdemocrcacy@democracy.orgDate: Friday, August 7, 2009, 2:10 PMSTATE SECRET PROTECTION ACT OF 2009=======================================================================HEARINGBEFORE THESUBCOMMITTEE ON THE CONSTITUTION,CIVIL RIGHTS, AND CIVIL LIBERTIESOF THECOMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARYHOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESSFIRST SESSIONONH.R. 984__________JUNE 4, 2009__________SerialNo. 111-14__________Printed for the use of the Committee on the JudiciaryAvailable via the World Wide Web: http://judiciary.house.gov----------U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE50-070 PDF WASHINGTON : 2009For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government PrintingOffice Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800;DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP,Washington, DC 20402-0001COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARYJOHN CONYERS, Jr., Michigan, ChairmanHOWARD L. BERMAN, California LAMAR SMITH, TexasRICK BOUCHER, Virginia F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, Jr.,JERROLD NADLER, New YorkWisconsinROBERT C. ``BOBBY'' SCOTT, Virginia HOWARD COBLE, North CarolinaMELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina ELTON GALLEGLY, CaliforniaZOE LOFGREN, California BOB GOODLATTE, VirginiaSHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas DANIEL E. LUNGREN, CaliforniaMAXINE WATERS, California DARRELL E. ISSA, CaliforniaWILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts J. RANDY FORBES, VirginiaROBERT WEXLER, Florida STEVE KING, IowaSTEVE COHEN, Tennessee TRENT FRANKS, ArizonaHENRY C. ``HANK'' JOHNSON, Jr., LOUIE GOHMERT, TexasGeorgia JIM JORDAN, OhioPEDRO PIERLUISI, Puerto Rico TED POE, TexasMIKE QUIGLEY, Illinois JASON CHAFFETZ, UtahLUIS V. GUTIERREZ, Illinois TOM ROONEY, FloridaBRAD SHERMAN, California GREGG HARPER, MississippiTAMMY BALDWIN, WisconsinCHARLES A. GONZALEZ, TexasANTHONYD. WEINER, New YorkADAM B. SCHIFF, CaliforniaLINDA T. SANCHEZ, CaliforniaDEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, FloridaDANIEL MAFFEI, New YorkPerry Apelbaum, Majority Staff Director and Chief CounselSean McLaughlin, Minority Chief of Staff and General Counsel------Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil LibertiesJERROLD NADLER, New York, ChairmanMELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, Jr.,ROBERT C. ``BOBBY'' SCOTT, Virginia WisconsinWILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts TOM ROONEY, FloridaHENRY C. ``HANK'' JOHNSON, Jr., STEVE KING, IowaGeorgia TRENT FRANKS, ArizonaTAMMY BALDWIN, Wisconsin LOUIE GOHMERT, TexasJOHN CONYERS, Jr., Michigan JIM JORDAN, OhioSTEVE COHEN, TennesseeBRADSHERMAN,CaliforniaSHEILA JACKSON LEE, TexasDavid Lachmann, Chief of StaffPaul B. Taylor, Minority CounselC O N T E N T S----------JUNE 4, 2009PageTHE BILLH.R. 984, the ``State Secret Protection Act of 2009.............. 4OPENING STATEMENTSThe Honorable Jerrold Nadler, a Representative in Congress fromthe State of New York, and Chairman, Subcommittee on theConstitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties................ 1The Honorable F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr., a Representative inCongress from the State of Wisconsin,and RankingMember,Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and CivilLiberties...................................................... 17The Honorable John Conyers, Jr., a Representative in Congressfrom the State of Michigan, Chairman, Committee on theJudiciary, and Member, Subcommittee on the Constitution, CivilRights, and Civil Liberties.................................... 18WITNESSESThe Honorable Patricia M. Wald, retired Chief Judge, U.S. CourtoF Appeals for the District of ColumbiaOral Testimony................................................. 21Prepared Statement............................................. 24The Honorable Asa Hutchinson, Senior Partner, Hutchinson LawGroupOral Testimony................................................. 29PreparedStatement............................................. 31Mr.Andrew Grossman, Senior Legal Policy Analyst, The HeritageFoundationOral Testimony................................................. 55Prepared Statement............................................. 57Mr. Ben Wizner, National Security Project Staff Attorney,American Civil Liberties UnionOral Testimony................................................. 83Prepared Statement............................................. 85APPENDIXMaterial Submitted for the Hearing Record........................ 111STATE SECRET PROTECTION ACT OF 2009----------THURSDAY, JUNE 4, 2009House of Representatives,Subcommittee on theConstitution,Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties,Committee on the Judiciary,Washington, DC.The Subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 2:09 p.m., inroom 2141, Rayburn House Office Building, the Honorable JerroldNadler (Chairman of the Subcommittee) presiding.Present: Representatives Nadler, Conyers, Delahunt,Johnson, Sensenbrenner, Franks, and King.Staff Present: Heather Sawyer, Majority Counsel; and PaulTaylor, Minority Counsel.Mr. Nadler. This hearing of the Subcommittee on theConstitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties will come toorder.Today's hearing will examine the state secrets privilege.The Chair recognizes himself for 5 minutes for an openingstatement.Today, the Subcommittee examines legislation that I haveintroduced, alongwith the distinguished Chairman of the fullCommittee, with Representative TomPetri, and with severalother Members of the Committee, that would codify uniformstandards for dealing with claims of the state secretsprivilege by the government in civil litigation.In the last Congress, we had an oversight hearing on thestate secrets privilege and a hearing on this legislation. Thebill was reported favorably to the full Committee.Our experience has demonstrated the destructive impact thatsweeping claims of privilege and secrecy can have on ourNation. In order for the rule of law to have any meaning,individual liberties and rights must be enforceable in ourcourts. Separation-of-powers concerns are at their highest withregard to secret executive branch conduct, and the governmentsimply cannot be allowed to hide behind unexamined claims ofsecrecy and become the final arbiter ofits own conduct.Yet, claims of secrecy have been used to conceal mattersfrom Congress even though Members have the security clearancenecessary to be briefed in an appropriately secure setting.That has been the case with respect to the use of torture, withthe use of illegal spying on Americans, and other matters oftremendous national importance.And let me add here that this issue is perhaps the mostimportant issue, in my judgment, this Committee will face,because this Committee is charged with enforcing civil rightsand civil liberties under our Constitution. And there is anancient maxim of law that says there is no right without aremedy. And if the government violates your rights, if itkidnaps you, it tortures you, it deliberately burns down yourhouse, it wiretaps you without a warrant, whatever, how do youenforce your right against the government?Well, theAdministration could criminally prosecute its ownmembers who have done so; that isunlikely. Congress couldexercise oversight; that is hit or miss. Or the victim can suein tort, he can sue the government for illegal wiretapping, forkidnapping, for intentional infliction of mental distress, forassault, whatever.But if the government can eliminate that lawsuit on thepleadings simply by coming into court and using the magicincantation of the words ``state secrets,'' and say, ``Thiscase should be dismissed because we say, in our unexaminedassertion, that trying the case would necessitate therevelation of state secrets, case dismissed,'' then there is norecourse to the courts and there is no enforcement of rights.And rights without a remedy are illusory and we have no rights.Therefore, we must put some limits on this use of the statesecret doctrine.The same pattern ofresorting to extravagant state secretsclaims has been evident in the courts. While theBushadministration did not invent the use of the state secretsprivilege to conceal wrongdoing, it certainly perfected theart. The state secrets privilege has been abused by priorAdministrations to protect officials who have behaved illegallyor improperly or simply in an embarrassing manner, rather thanto protect the safety and security of the Nation.The landmark case in the field, U.S. v. Reynolds, is aperfect case in point. The widows of three civilian engineerssued the government for negligence stemming from a fatal aircrash. The government refused to produce the accident report,even refusing to provide it to the court to review, claiming itwould reveal sensitive state secrets that would endangernational security. The Supreme Court concurred without everlooking behind the government'sunsupported assertion thatnational security was involved.Half a century later, thereport was found, nowdeclassified, online by the daughter of one of the engineers,and it clearly revealed no state secrets. It clearly could havebeen made available in a form that would have enabled thosefamilies to vindicate their rights in court. It did, however,reveal that the crash was caused by government negligence,which I suspect was the real reason for the invocation, or theinvention in that case, of the state secrets doctrine.Protecting the government from embarrassment and civilliability, not protecting national security, was the realreason for withholding the accident report. Yet these familieswere denied justice because the Supreme Court never lookedbehind the government's false claim to determine whether it wasvalid.Similarly, in the Pentagon Papers case,then-SolicitorGeneral Erwin Griswold warned the Supreme Court thatpublication of the information wouldpose a grave and immediatedanger to national security. Eighteen years later, heacknowledged that he had never seen, quote, ``any trace of athreat to the national security,'' unquote, from thepublication of the information and further admitted that,quote, ``The principle concern is not with national securitybut rather with government embarrassment of one sort oranother,'' close quote.It is important to protect national security, and sometimesour courts have to balance the need for individual justice withnational security considerations. Congress has in the pastbalanced these important, albeit sometimes competing, demands.In the criminal context, we enacted the Classified InformationsProcedure Act. In FISA, we set up procedures for the courts toexamine sensitivematerials. Through the Freedom of InformationAct, we sought to limit any withholding of information from thepublic whom the government is supposed to serve.We can and should do the same in civil cases. Our system ofgovernment and our legal system have never relied on takingassurances at face value. The courts and the Congress have aduty to look behind what this Administration or anyAdministration says to determine whether or not thoseassurances are well-founded.Presidents and other government officials have been knownnot to tell the truth on occasion, especially when it is intheir interest to conceal something. The founders of thisNation knew that there needed to be checks in each branch ofthe government to prevent such abuses from taking the place.Or, in the words of the Ninth Circuit in the recent Jeppesendecision, ``The executive cannot be its own judge.'' To allowthat--and these are now my words--to allow that is to abandonall the protections against tyranny that ourFounding Fathersestablished.Courts have a duty to protect national security secrets,but they also have a duty to make an independent judgment as towhether state secrets claims have any merit. When thegovernment itself is a party, the court cannot allow it tobecome the final arbiter of its own case. The purpose of thislegislation is to ensure that the correct balance is struck.I would just add that I am extremely disappointed that theDepartment of Justice has declined to provide a witness todiscuss this very important issue at this hearing. I have metwith the Attorney General, and I understand that a review ofthis policy is currently under way. Nonetheless, the Departmentcontinues to go into court while this review is under way andtake positions that areremarkably similar to positions takenby the last Administration.While I greatly appreciate the Attorney General'swillingness to work with us, I believe that it should bepossible to send someone to provide us with theAdministration's views and to answer our questions to theextent that they are able. I hope this is not a sign of thingsto come.I look forward to the testimony of our witnesses.I would now recognize the distinguished Ranking minorityMember, the gentleman from Wisconsin, Mr. Sensenbrenner, forhis opening statement.[The bill, H.R. 984, follows:][GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]Mr. Sensenbrenner. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.The state secrets privilege is a longstanding legaldoctrine the Supreme Court most recently described in a casecalled U.S. v. Reynolds. In that case, the court made it clearthat if the court,after giving appropriate deference to theexecutive branch, determines that public disclosure ofinformation would harmnational security, the court is obligedto either dismiss the case or limit the public disclosure ofnational security information as necessary.Under this doctrine, people with legitimate claims are notdenied access to court review. Rather, the doctrine allowsjudges to personally review any sensitive information. Whilethis doctrine may occasionally disadvantage someone suing incourt, it is vital to protecting the safety of all Americans.The roots of the state secrets privilege extend all the wayback to Chief Justice Marshall, the author of Marbury v.Madison, who held that the government need not provide anyinformation that would endanger public safety.In the modern era, Congress debated the issue of the statesecrets privilege under Federal law in the1970's butultimately chose to maintain the status quo, including elementsof the privilege put in place by the Supreme Courtin itsReynolds decision. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals recentlyemployed the doctrine in affirming the dismissal of the case,including that the state secrets privilege has a firmfoundation in the Constitution.Not surprisingly, the privilege has played a significantrole in the Justice Department's response to civil litigationarising out of our counterterrorism efforts following 9/11.The state secrets doctrine remains strongly supported bytoday's Supreme Court. Even in its Boumediene decision grantinghabeas litigation rights to terrorists, Justice Kennedy, in hismajority opinion, acknowledged the government's legitimateinterest in protecting sources and methods of intelligencegathering and stated, ``We expect the district court will useitsdiscretion to accommodate this interest to the greatestextent possible,'' while citing the Reynolds state secrets caseImentioned earlier in doing so.I oppose any efforts, including this bill, that invite thecourts to deviate from the sound procedures they currentlyfollow to protect vital national security information. H.R. 984would preclude judges from giving weight to the executivebranch's assessment of national security. And it wouldauthorize courts not to use ex parte proceedings in conductinga review of privileged claims. And it would prevent courts frombeing able to dismiss a case when the government cannot defenditself without using privileged information.The Obama administration is clearly not enamored with theapproach of this legislation and has adhered in court to thedoctrine as asserted by the previous Administration in at leastthree cases already. Accordingto The Washington Post editorialpage, the Obama administration's position on state secretsmakes it hard to distinguish fromits predecessor. AnthonyRomero, the executive director of the ACLU, has written thatthe new Administration has embraced policies held over from theBush era, including the use of the state secrets claim.Last Congress, legislation essentially the same as H.R. 984was cosponsored in the Senate by Senators Joe Biden and HillaryClinton, who are now President Obama's Vice President andSecretary of State. But this year, President Obama, VicePresident Biden, and Secretary of State Clinton have gonesilent on the bill. When asked about it recently, the VicePresident's communications director said, quote, ``No commenton this one here.''
Read more…
--- On Fri, 8/7/09, Ron Angell wrote:From: Ron AngellSubject: 6/12/09 Fw: MNN Are Mohawks going to be invaded-A squad of 150 to 200 cruisers and SUVs came in and practically massacred our people. There was blood everywhere,To: "'FEED - Union of Concerned Scientists'" , OTP.InformationDesk@icc-cpi.int, "katherine friedli" , "Kathernine Friendi" , "Astrid" , "Karoline Astrid" , uk@un.int, usa@un.int, peru@un.int, panama@un.intDate: Friday, August 7, 2009, 11:01 AMThis morning at 6:45 am the OPP came to the Skyway Bridge which the Mohawks of Tyendinaga had never closed down. They slowed down traffic giving out information to support the Mohawks of Akwesasne. The OPP and the band council Mohawk Police shut it down and kept the public off the bridge. A squad of 150 to 200 cruisers and SUVs came in and practically massacred our people. There was blood everywhere, which was quickly mopped by the OPP, using fire hoses to immediately wash down any evidence. 14 were hurt.--- On Fri, 6/12/09, Mohawk Nation News wrote:From: Mohawk Nation NewsSubject: MNN Are Mohawks going to be invaded???To: ronangellwork@yahoo.comDate: Friday, June 12, 2009, 7:02 PMARE AKWESASNE MOHAWKS BEING SET UP FOR AN INVASION? OPP attack Tyendinaga supportersMNN. June 15, 2009. It was one year since two grandmothers were brutally attacked by CBSA border agents at Akwesasne. One was almost killed by a trauma induced heart attack. We are trying to anticipate the strategy of the colonists.These corporatist forces recently attacked our brothers in the Amazon rainforest. Helicopters flew overhead and shot and bombed them, massacring over a hundred unarmed untouched natives who still live in the rainforest, cut off from modern life, as their ancestors always did. With only spears for weapons they weren’t a threat. Their bodies were taken away and the blood was quickly cleaned up.Here, the plan is to create situations where Mohawks are falsely seen as unruly or as terrorists. Prime Minister Stephen Harper wants to declare he has no choice but take control of our “reserves”, put us under third party management, expropriate our communities and hand them over to his corporate backers. He wants to hand over multi billion dollars of real estate to them.Akwesasne would be turned over to outsiders for resorts, casinos, condos and creating a playground for the elite. Cornwall Island would become part of a NAFTA super highway complex. We would be removed. An American would be able to come into Canada without having to pass through a border checkpoint. Kahnawake would become part of Montreal. Six Nations would become part of surrounding municipalities. Harper has to do this before he gets kicked out of office.This morning at 6:45 am the OPP came to the Skyway Bridge which the Mohawks of Tyendinaga had never closed down. They slowed down traffic giving out information to support the Mohawks of Akwesasne. The OPP and the band council Mohawk Police shut it down and kept the public off the bridge. A squad of 150 to 200 cruisers and SUVs came in and practically massacred our people. There was blood everywhere, which was quickly mopped by the OPP, using fire hoses to immediately wash down any evidence. 14 were hurt.The Shiprider Agreement was signed by Canada and US on May 26, 2009 to escalate the North American Union and martial law. All law enforcement, intelligence, military and border patrol come under the Pentagon. RCMP and armed US Coast Guards can enter each others waterway, in particular, the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River, which is Haudenosaunee Territory. Obviously, Harper without Parliamentary approval has relinquished sovereignty over the colony of Canada. These executive decisions never went through Parliament or Congress because they say it’s to pursue terrorists and criminals.NORAD [North American Air Defense] covers air space. Shiprider covers the naval aspect. Land integration is not yet signed.The combined forces could come in to attack the Mohawks, with the excuse that they are pursuing terrorists. The Nazi in WW II used this same tactic. German soldiers dressed as Polish soldiers blew up railroads in Germany. This justified the Germans attacking Poland. US fascists are doing the same thing.On June 1, 2009, the Canadian border guards were supposed to start carrying guns. They knew well in advance that the Mohawks would resist. US and Canada blocked the bridges onto the Cornwall Island portion of Akwesasne. We have no choice but to travel by our boats to take our kids to school, go to work and do normal family activities. It’s only a matter of time before the coast guard will start arresting and taking us to holding facilities nearby. No trial. No habeas corpus. No legal rights just like Guantano. It’s martial law because the military is involved.What threat will the US and Canada make as an excuse to launch this invasion? The US military choppers have been flying over the MNN office and followed a Mohawk woman to Cornwall courthouse yesterday.NorthCom coordinates this under US Homeland Security at Peterson Air Force Base in Colorado. The US took illegal jurisdiction of Great Turtle Island to launch military domination of the world. Canada is central because of resources like ore, oil, uranium, raw materials and water.Canada has accepted US immigration, anti-terrorist laws, police state, racist policies, ethnic profiling and arbitrary arrests of anti-war activists.Canada’s Public Safety is part of US Homeland Security. All civilian police, judicial and intelligence structures, militarization of government bodies and agencies are integrated under the Pentagon. US military bases can be built in Canada.Big Brother Data Bank is operated by Homeland Security, FBI and CIA. They have security, confidential information, tax and medical records, credit card, banking, educational, employment data, travel, internet, email, phone and fax info.Code Red Alerts from a Canadian municipality could bring in US troops or special forces. The flu panemic has raised the alert level, although there appears to be few victims. CBC stated the natives in the north who don’t travel are dying of this pandemic. Law enforcement and military are being set up to intervene.Canadian companies support the US initiative. They want lucrative multi million dollar contracts for war reconstruction. Most Canadian weapons producers are affiliates of US defense conglomerates. Big contracts are expected by General Dynamics, Bell Helicoptor Textron, General Motors Defense, CAE, Bombardier, SNC Lavalin Group and others.The goal of war economies such as Canada, US and Mexico is complete integration in trade, finance and investment, under the control of US corporatist war lords.Harper desperately needs to push us out of the way while he has power. He wants his multinational supporters to rape our land. The Jay Treaty 1794 cannot be rescinded unless there is a terrorist threat. They created a myth. For some reason a small group of women, children and grandmothers are the emergency! The CBSA border guards are so scared they even interrogated an 18-month baby as a terrorist threat!Kahentinetha MNN Mohawk Nation News, www.mohawknationnews.com kahentinetha2@yahoo.com Go to MNN “BORDER” category for more stories;Contact Rotiskenrakete 514-269-1400. N. Benedict 613-551-5421 613-938-8145 nbenedict@akwesasne.ca, go to www.akwesasne.ca. Chief Wesley Benedict 613-551-2573; Larry King 613-551-1930; Chief Joe Lazore 613-551-5292. Tyendinaga: 613-848-6968, 613-813-1017, 613-391-5132Supporters may send comments to: Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Buckingham Palace, London, SQ1A UK; President Barack Obama, The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20500, http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ Comments: 202-456-1111, Switchboard: 202-456-1414 FAX: 202-456-2461; The Governor General of Canada, M. Michaelle Jean, 1 Rideau Drive, Ottawa info@gg.ca; Alain Jolicoeur, President, CBSA, Ottawa, ON K1A 0L8, 613-952-3200, 613-957-0612; General inquiries CBSA-ASFC@canada.gc.ca; Lance Markell, District Director, Northern Office – Customs, St. Laurent Blvd., Ottawa Ont. K1G 4K3, CBSA 613-930-3234, 613-991-1214, General inquiries CBSA-ASFC@canada.gc.ca; Secretary Janet Napolitano, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528, Operator Number: 202-282-8000, Comment Line: 202-282-8495, Jayson P. Ahern, A/Commissioner, U.S. Customs, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20229 Chief Counsel (202) 344-2990; Marco A. Lopez, Jr., Chief of Staff, U.S. Customs, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20229; Prime Minister Stephen Harper; House of Commons, Ottawa, harper.s@parl.gc.ca; Hon. Stockwell Day, Minister of Public Safety, House of Commons, Ottawa; Hon. Robert Douglas Nicholson, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, 284 Wellington St., Ottawa, ON K1A 0H8; Attorney General of Ontario, 720 Bay St., 4th Floor, Toronto, ON M5G 2K1; Hon. Yvon Marcoux, Minister of Justice and A.G.O., Louis-Phillipe-Pigeon Bldg., 1200 Rue d l'Eglise, 9th Floor, St. Foy G1V 4M1; Hon. Chuck Strahl, Minister of Indian Affairs, 10 Wellington St., Hull, Que. K1A 0H4 Strahl.c@parl.gc.ca; Premier Dalton McGuinty, Province of Ontario, Queens Park, Toronto ON; Premier Charest, Province of Quebec, Legislature, Quebec City; British High Commission, 80 Elgin St., Ottawa, ON K1P 5K7; Canadian Human Rights Commission, 344 Slater St., 8th Floor Ottawa, ON K1A 1E1; United Nations, 405 E 42nd Street, New York, NY 10017; The Hague, Anna Paulownastraat, 103, 251 BBC, The Netherlands; Coalition for the International Criminal Court, c/o WFM, 708 3rd Ave., 24th Floor, New York, NY 10017Supporters of Mohawks: MPs Jean Crowder, Indian Affairs critic crowdj@parl.gc.ca ; Anita Neville nevila@parl.gc.ca ; Marc Lemay lemaym@parl.gc.ca ; Sen. Nancy Green; Sen. Gerry St. Germain;
Read more…
Now along with SALT II there needs to be mind weapons discussions at the United Nations as well as other International human rights organizations.http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/acda/treaties/salt2-4.htmhttp://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/acda/treaties/salt2-1.htmWhy has the SALT II Treaty not been implemented as agreed upon in 1974 by treaty between the USSR and the USA? President Carter Worked So hard for Salt II treaty. Was it the Defense Companies that used the mind weapons to stop the agreed upon treaty by Russia and the USA?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_Arms_Limitation_Talkshttp://www.state.gov/www/global/arms/treaties/salt2-1.htmlTREATY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS ON THE LIMITATION OF STRATEGIC OFFENSIVE ARMSIn accordance with Article VII of the Interim Agreement, in which the sides committed themselves to continue active negotiations on strategic offensive arms, the SALT II negotiations began in November 1972. The primary goal of SALT II was to replace the Interim Agreement with a long-term comprehensive Treaty providing broad limits on strategic offensive weapons systems. The principal U.S. objectives as the SALT II negotiations began were to provide for equal numbers of strategic nuclear delivery vehicles for the sides, to begin the process of reduction of these delivery vehicles, and to impose restraints on qualitative developments which could threaten future stability.Early discussion between the sides focused on the weapon systems to be included, factors involved in providing for equality in numbers of strategic nuclear delivery vehicles, taking into account the important differences between the forces of the two sides, bans on new systems, qualitative limits, and a Soviet proposal to include U.S. forward-based systems. The positions of the sides differed widely on many of these issues.A major breakthrough occurred at the Vladivostok meeting in November 1974, between President Ford and General Secretary Brezhnev. At this meeting, the sides agreed to a basic framework for the SALT II agreement. Basic elements of the Aide-Memoire, which recorded this agreement, included:-- 2,400 equal aggregate limit on strategic nuclear delivery vehicles (ICBMs, SLBMs, and heavy bombers) of the sides;-- 1,320 equal aggregate limit on MIRV systems;-- ban on construction of new land-based ICBM launchers;-- limits on deployment of new types of strategic offensive arms; and-- important elements of the Interim Agreement (e.g., relating to verification) would be incorporated in the new agreement.In addition, the Aide-Memoire stated that the duration of the new agreement would be through 1985.In early 1975, the delegations in Geneva resumed negotiations, working toward an agreement based on this general framework. It was during this time that a Joint Draft Text was first prepared and many limitations were agreed. During the negotiations, however, it became clear that there was fundamental disagreement between the two sides on two major issues: how cruise missiles were to be addressed, and whether the new Soviet bomber known to the United States as Backfire would be considered a heavy bomber and therefore counted in the 2,400 aggregate. While there was disagreement on other issues such as MIRV verification provisions, restrictions on new systems, and missile throw-weight ceilings, progress was made in these areas. However, the issues of cruise missiles and Backfire remained unresolved.When the new Administration took office in 1977, renewed emphasis was placed on the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks. A comprehensive interagency review of SALT was undertaken. Building on the work of the previous Administra-tion, particularly the Vladivostok accord and the subsequent agreement on many issues in Geneva, the United States made a comprehen-sive proposal which was presented to the Soviets by Secretary of State Vance in March 1977. This proposal would have added significant reductions and qualitative constraints to the ceilings which were agreed to at Vladivostok. At the same time, the United States also presented an alternative proposal for a SALT II agreement similar to the framework agreed to at Vladivostok, with the Backfire and cruise missile issues deferred until SALT III.Both proposals were rejected by the Soviets as inconsistent with their understandings of the Vladivostok accord.In subsequent negotiations, the sides agreed on a general framework for SALT II which accommodated both the Soviet desire to retain the Vladivostok framework for an agreement, and the U.S. desire for more comprehensive limitations in SALT II.The agreement would consist of three parts:-- A Treaty which would be in force through 1985 based on the Vladivostok accord;-- A Protocol of about three-years duration which would cover certain issues such as cruise missile constraints, mobile ICBM limits, and qualitative constraints on ICBMs, while deferring further negotiations on these issues to SALT III;-- A Joint Statement of Principles which would be an agreed set of guidelines for future negotiations.Within this framework, negotiations to resolve the remaining differences continued on several levels. President Carter, Secretary Vance, and Soviet Foreign Minister Gromyko met in Washington in September 1977. Further high-level meetings were held in Washington, Moscow, and Geneva during 1978 and 1979. In addition, the SALT delegations of the United States and Soviet Union in Geneva were in session nearly continuously following the 1974 Vladivostok meeting to work out agreed Treaty language on those issues where agreement in principle had been reached at the ministerial level.The completed SALT II agreement was signed by President Carter and General Secretary Brezhnev in Vienna on June 18, 1979. President Carter transmitted it to the Senate on June 22 for its advice and consent to ratification.On January 3, 1980, however, President Carter requested the Senate majority leader to delay consideration of the Treaty on the Senate floor in view of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Although the Treaty remained unratified, each Party was individually bound under the terms of international law to refrain from acts which would defeat the object and purpose of the Treaty, until it had made its intentions clear not to become a party to the Treaty.In 1980, President Carter announced the United States would comply with the provisions of the Treaty as long as the Soviet Union reciprocated. Brezhnev made a similar statement regarding Soviet intentions.In May 1982, President Reagan stated he would do nothing to undercut the SALT agreements as long as the Soviet Union showed equal restraint. The Soviet Union again agreed to abide by the unratified Treaty.Subsequently, in 1984 and 1985, President Reagan declared that the Soviet Union had violated its political commitment to observe the SALT II Treaty. President Reagan decided, however, that an interim framework of mutual restraint remained in the U.S. interest and, in June 1985, declared that the United States would continue to refrain from undercutting existing strategic arms agreements to the extent that the Soviet Union exercised comparable restraint and provided that the Soviet Union actively pursued arms reductions agreements in the Nuclear and Space Talks in Geneva.On May 26, 1986, President Reagan stated that he had reviewed again the status of U.S. interim restraint policy and that, as he had documented in three detailed reports to the Congress, the Soviet Union had not complied with its political commitment to observe the SALT agreements, including the SALT II Treaty, nor had the Soviet Union indicated its readiness to join in a framework of truly mutual restraint. He declared that, "Given this situation, ... in the future, the United States must base decisions regarding its strategic force structure on the nature and magnitude of the threat posed by Soviet strategic forces and not on standards contained in the SALT structure...." In his statement, President Reagan said that he did not anticipate any appreciable numerical growth in U.S. strategic offensive forces and that, assuming no significant change in the threat, the United States would not deploy more strategic nuclear delivery vehicles or strategic ballistic missile warheads than the Soviets. The United States would, in sum, "...continue to exercise the utmost restraint, while protecting strategic deterrence, in order to help foster the necessary atmosphere for significant reductions in the strategic arsenals of both sides." He again called upon the Soviet Union to join the United States "...in establishing an interim framework of truly mutual restraint."The SALT II Treaty would have provided for:-- an equal aggregate limit on the number of strategic nuclear delivery vehicles -- ICBM and SLBM launchers, heavy bombers, and air-to-surface ballistic missiles (ASBMs). Initially, this ceiling would have been 2,400 as agreed at Vladivostok. The ceiling would have been lowered to 2,250 at the end of 1981;-- an equal aggregate limit of 1,320 on the total number of launchers of MIRVed ballistic missiles and heavy bombers with long-range cruise missiles;-- an equal aggregate limit of 1,200 on the total number of launchers of MIRVed ballistic missiles; and-- an equal aggregate limit of 820 on launchers of MIRVed ICBMs.In addition to these numerical limits, the agreement would have included:-- a ban on construction of additional fixed ICBM launchers, and on increases in the number of fixed heavy ICBM launchers;-- a ban on heavy mobile ICBM launchers, and on launchers of heavy submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) and air-to-surface ballistic missiles (ASBMs);-- a ban on flight-testing or deployment of new types of ICBMs, with an exception of one new type of light ICBM for each side;-- a ban on increasing the numbers of warheads on existing types of ICBMs, and a limit of 10 warheads on the one new type of ICBM permitted to each Party, a limit of 14 warheads on SLBMs, and 10 warheads on ASBMs. The number of long-range cruise missiles per heavy bomber would have been limited to an average of 28; and the number of long-range cruise missiles per heavy bomber of existing types would have been limited to 20;-- ceilings on the launch-weight and throw-weight of strategic ballistic missiles and a ban on the conversion of light ICBM launchers to launchers of heavy ICBMs;-- a ban on the Soviet SS-16 ICBM;-- a ban on rapid reload ICBM systems;-- a ban on certain new types of strategic offensive systems which were technologically feasible, but which had not yet been deployed. Such systems included long-range ballistic missiles on surface ships, and ballistic and cruise missile launchers on the seabeds;-- advance notification of certain ICBM test launches; and-- an agreed data base for systems included in various SALT-limited categories.The Treaty also included detailed definitions of limited systems, provisions to enhance verification, a ban on circumvention of the provisions of the agreement, and a provision outlining the duties of the SCC in connection with the SALT II Treaty. The duration of the Treaty was to have been through 1985.Verification of the SALT II Treaty would have been by national technical means (NTM) of verification, including photo-reconnaissance satellites. The sides had agreed not to interfere with each others national technical means of verification, and not to use deliberate concealment measures which would have impeded verification by NTM of compliance with the provisions of the agreement. Because specific characteristics of some SALT-limited systems become apparent during the testing phase, monitoring of testing programs was an important aspect of SALT verification. Such monitoring might have involved collection of electronic signals known as telemetry which are used during tests to transmit information about systems while they are being tested. Therefore, the sides had agreed not to engage in deliberate denial of telemetric information such as through the use of telemetry encryption whenever such denial would have impeded verification of compliance with the provisions of the Treaty.In addition to these provisions of the Treaty which directly addressed the question of verification, counting and distinguishability rules, as well as some constraints on specific systems, were incorporated into the agreement specifically for verification purposes.To facilitate verification of the MIRV limits, the sides agreed that once a missile had been tested with MIRVs, then all missiles of that type were to be considered to have been equipped with MIRVs, even if that missile type had also been tested with a non-MIRV payload. Additionally, the sides agreed that once a launcher contained or launched a MIRVed missile, then all launchers of that type would be considered to be launchers of MIRVed missiles and included in the 1,320 limit. Similar counting rules were adopted for cruise missiles and for heavy bombers.A constraint included for verification purposes was a ban on production, testing, and deployment of the Soviet SS-16 ICBM. The missile appeared to share a number of components with the Soviet SS-20, an intermediate range ballistic missile (IRBM). As the Parties had agreed that land-based launchers of ballistic missiles which are not ICBMs should not be converted into launchers of ICBMs, the United States sought this ban on the SS-16 in order to prevent verification problems which might have arisen if the SS-16 program had gone forward, since in that case distinguishing between SS-16 and SS-20 deployments would have been very difficult.Pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding, the sides exchanged data on the numbers of weapons in SALT-limited categories, and agreed to maintain this agreed data base through regular updates at each session of the Standing Consultative Commission. Although the United States did not require (and did not rely upon) this data for verification purposes, maintenance of the agreed data base would have insured that both parties applied the provisions of the Treaty in a consistent manner.The protocol to the Treaty was to have remained in force until December 31, 1981. In the protocol the sides agreed to ban deployment of mobile ICBM launchers and flight-testing of ICBMs from such launchers. Development of such systems short of flight-testing would have been permitted. (After the protocol period, the Treaty specifically permitted the deployment of mobile ICBM launchers.)Additionally, the protocol banned deployment, but not testing, of cruise missiles capable of ranges in excess of 600 kilometers on ground- and sea-based launchers. (The protocol would not have limited deployment of such systems after its expiration in 1981.)Finally, the protocol included a ban on flight testing and deployment of ASBMs.The Joint Statement of Principles, the third element of the SALT II agreement, would have established a basic framework for the next stage of SALT negotiations, SALT III. The sides agreed on the following general goals to be achieved in the next round of talks:-- significant and substantial reductions in the number of strategic offensive arms; -- further qualitative limitations on strategic offensive arms; and -- resolution of the issues included in the protocol.The sides would also have considered other steps to enhance strategic stability, and either side could have brought up any other topic relevant to the limitation of strategic arms.The Joint Statement of Principles also established the principle that cooperative measures might be used to ensure adequate verification of a SALT III agreement, raising the possibility of thus going beyond reliance on national technical means of verification alone.
Read more…
PETITION - TO YOU OUR SELECTED WITNESSES - over 900 TORTURE CASES.doc
default_file_other_unknown_small.gif
Added 2 hours ago--- On Wed, 8/5/09, Ron Angell wrote:From: Ron AngellSubject: Fw: TO WORLD RELIGIOUS LEADERS - over 950 DIRECTED ENERGY AND NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONS, AND ORGANISED STALKING, TORTURE AND ABUSE CASESTo: "'FEED - Union of Concerned Scientists'" , OTP.InformationDesk@icc-cpi.int, uk@un.int, usa@un.int, "katherine friedli" , "Kathernine Friendi" , "ACLU Anthony D. Romero" , "ACLU-NJ" , ACLUOnline@aclu.org, alw@peaceinspace.org, "John Allman" , "o ob" , "o ob" , panama@un.int, peru@un.int, haarpmindcontrol@gmail.com, belgium@un.int, "Astrid" , "Karoline Astrid"Date: Wednesday, August 5, 2009, 8:45 PM----- Forwarded Message ----From: mick harrisonTo: benedictXVI@vatican.va; benoitXVI@vatican.va; office@holyseemission.org; holysee@un.int; vatikan-ob@bmaa.gv.at; ohhdl@dalailama.com; mpilo@iafrica.com; info@tutu.org; nomfundo@tutu.org; info@tutufoundation-usa.org; marie.papworth@lambethpalace.org.ukCc: claire.robinson@canterbury.ac.uk; jmitchell@rainbowpush.org; oic@un.int; hkurlander@ajcongress.org; president@ajcongress.org; chairman@ajcongress.org; governing_council_chair@ajcongress.org; executive_director@ajcongress.org; bfaber@ajcongress.org; mhorn@ajcongress.org; communications@ajcongress.org; ssaturn@ajcongress.org; mstern@ajcongress.org; dtwersky@ajcongress.org; contact@ajcongress.org; washrep@ajcongress.org; LA@ajcongress.org; florida@ajcongress.org; jengelmayer@ajcongress.org; dallas@ajcongress.org; dgrosman@ajcongress.org; jumansky@stllaw.net; Israel@ajcongress.org; PR@ajc.org; ottolenghie@transatlanticinstitute.org; hoffenbergv@ajc.org; tandonp@ajc.org; israel@ajc.org; billigl@ajc.org; stankrajewski@hotmail.com; contact@unwatch.org; OTP.InformationDesk@icc-cpi.int; jelena.vukasinovic@icc-cpi.intSent: Wednesday, August 5, 2009 9:09:55 PMSubject: TO WORLD RELIGIOUS LEADERS - over 950 DIRECTED ENERGY AND NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONS, AND ORGANISED STALKING, TORTURE AND ABUSE CASES6 August 2009TO WORLD RELIGIOUS LEADERSHere is the link to our over 950 DIRECTED ENERGY AND NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONS, AND ORGANISED STALKING, TORTURE, DEGRADATION AND MUTILATION VICTIMS' CASE SUMMARIES FOR YOU TO WITNESS, RECORD AND OPPOSE -http://www.freedrive.com/folder/177784 ORhttp://www.mydrive.ch username – johnfinch password - TORTURECASESSome of our DIRECTED ENERGY AND NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONS, AND ORGANISED STALKING TORTURE AND ABUSE CASES detail the most extreme and totalitarian violations of human rights in human history, including the most horrendous psychological tortures, rapes, sexual abuse, surgical mutilations, ‘mind control’, and other mental and physical mutilations – see http://www.freedrive.com/folder/177784 ORhttp://www.mydrive.ch username – johnfinch password - TORTURECASESThere are MANY, MANY others, all over the world, who are being subjected to similar torture and abuse – citizens, combatants and leaders (‘suicide bombers’, coup-de-etats and puppet governments, literally).YOU HAVE BEEN CHOSEN TO BE “A SELECTED WITNESS” to these are extreme and monstrous CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY – indescribably terrible in themselves – coupled with the ORWELLIAN/STALINIST secrecy and denial of any support at all that we are experiencing, makes them even more horrendous and monstrous.We have contacted most Governments, Security/Intelligence Agencies, Religious Organisations, International Organizations, Human Rights Organizations, Universities, Scientific and other Institutions, and the International Media all over the world - over and over and over again – and have had our appeals for assistance, protection and/or publicity almost completely ignored and/or suppressed.Some TARGETED INDIVIDUALS have been attempting to gain assistance, protection and/or publicity about these crimes since the 1990s - and even earlier - this extends as far back into the history of illegal "scientific and medical" testing and experimentation as MKULTRA and the DUPLESSIS ORPHANS - and further.We are still collecting CASE SUMMARIES from TARGETED INDIVIDUALS all over the world, and we have also advised them to send them to you – “THE SELECTED WITNESSES” - TO WITNESS, RECORD AND OPPOSE so that :-A. We can be sure that as many people as possible know about these horrendous crimes.B. We can be sure that these AUTHORITIES and ORGANISATIONS are either trying to uphold the rule of National, International and Human Rights Law, and that we will, sooner or later, be protected by these laws.C. Or that we can be sure these AUTHORITIES and ORGANISATIONS are complicit and/or acquiescent to these CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY and that National, International and Human Rights Law no longer apply - in which case our task will be to get the rule of these laws restored.Later these records should become an information source - such as the INTERNATIONAL TRACING OFFICE set up to record the fates and whereabouts of Jews (and others?) after WW11. The information collected can then be used by the appropriate people for LEGAL, MEDICAL, WELFARE, HISTORICAL etc. records.As well as being illegal the crimes being committed against us are contrary to the Principles and Values of all the major religions and ethical systems - so we will also be demonstrating to all of these people and AUTHORITIES AND ORGANISATIONS the huge disconnect between their professed Principles and Values and the reality. We will be showing their monstrous Doublespeak Doublethink Doubledo ignorance, stupidity and/or hypocrisy.It is our responsibility to record and alert the world to these horrendous crimes - and the extreme danger that these technologies, powers and tendencies pose to human rights, liberty, democracy, privacy and the mental and physical freedom, individuality, integrity, health and growth of all people – in all their “infinite?” richness, degrees, dimensions, aspects, qualities and diversity!Make no mistake these are the most horrendous totalitarian weapons and crimes imaginable and the people and organizations using them are mass-murdering conspirators pursuing totalitarian fundamentalist schemes.Beware of the brain and gene phrenologists/determinists/reductionists, and those who seek to control and reduce the range, quality and diversity of human thoughts, imaginations, senses, sensibilities, moods, attitudes, speech and psycho-physiologies – the would-be socio-economic, cultural AND PSYCHOLOGICAL/INTELLECTUAL/ PHYSIOLOGICAL monopolists, monoculturalists, police and prosecutors who are already literally and physically actively at work amongst us!! Both monstrously and criminally, and also far more insidiously.And beware of this dumbing-down, disenfranchisement, degradation and monoculturalisation caused by the paucity and total degradation of public information and discourse, and the subsequent and consequent destruction of previously autonomous cultures, professions, fields of human endeavour, memories, and intelligences.NOT TO MENTION THE NUTCASES PURSUING SUCH FRANKENSTEIN-SCIENCES AS THE TRANSGENIC, AND THE “BLENDING” OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL AND BIOLOGICAL– EVEN AS RECORD BIODIVERSITY AND CULTURAL DIVERSITY DESTRUCTION IS DONE.It is no exaggeration to say our cases are as horrendous and urgent as people fleeing Nazi or Pol Pot concentration camps – specifically Dr Mengele-type butchers.We urgently need access to SAFE HOUSES to get protection from the directed energy and neurological weapons being used to torture, mutilate and kill US.Such SAFE HOUSES are available in Laboratories, Hospitals and Scientific/Military Facilities.PLEASE ASSIST US URGENTLY!!!PLEASE CONTACT US FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:-Yours in the search for openness and respect for universal human rightsJohn FinchMAIL: 5/8 Kemp St, Thornbury, Vic 3071, Australia, TEL: 0424009627EMAIL: tijohnfinch@gmail.com , MCmailteam@gmail.comTARGETED INDIVIDUAL and a member of THE WORLDWIDE CAMPAIGN AGAINST TORTURE, DEGRADATION AND MUTILATION USING DIRECTED ENERGY AND NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONSOur (very, very partial) LIST OF VICTIMS OF DIRECTED ENERGY & NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONS:-the link to our OVER 950 DIRECTED ENERGY AND NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONS, AND ORGANISED STALKING, TORTURE, DEGRADATION AND MUTILATION VICTIMS' CASE SUMMARIEShttp://www.freedrive.com/folder/177784 ORhttp://www.mydrive.ch username – johnfinch password - TORTURECASESTHE AMERICAS1. 13 VICTIMS FROM USA2. 3V3NG3LA3. ELIZABETH ADAMS4. AKU5. al236. NEAL ALCHALABI (NEAL CHAMBERS)7. ALETA8. GARY ALGAR9. CARLOS AMADOR10. TIM ANDERSON11. ANGELA12. ANGELICA13. RON ANGELL14. JUSTIN ANGIERS15. ANN16. ARIZONA - 6 VIGILANTE/ELECTRONIC HARASSMENT VICTIMS17. ANNYCE ARNTZEN18. RANDY ARRASMITH19. SUE ANNE ARRIGO MD FORMER SPECIAL OPERATIONS ADVISOR TO DIRECTORS OF CIA, FORMER INTELLIGENCE ADVISOR TO THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF IN 2003-2004, ASSIGNED A RANK OF A 2-STAR GENERAL.20. ARTHUR21. AARON AVALOS22. AZMAT (AKA NICK)23. DEVORAH BAKER24. LINDSAY G. BALDWIN25. VERNON WAYNE BALL26. KHMER BARANG27. BRENDA BARAQUIL28. A B29. KAY BARNES30. ERIC BARTLETT31. ERIC BAZAN32. DAVID ALAN BEACH33. MATT BEAL34. PAUL BEGGS35. SHERRY BELL36. MARILYN BERRY37. STACEY BERRY38. KATA BILLUPS39. BIOLOGICAL-ELECTRONIC EPIDEMY40. BARBARA BLACKBURN41. KAYLON BLACKBURN42. JOHN BRASWELL43. ALMA BRECKENRIDGE44. DAVID BRINSKO45. LAURIE BRODIE46. EMILIO BRUGUEROS47. BETH BUCHANAN48. MARC BURNELL49. KEVIN BURNOR50. ROBERT BUTLER51. ROBERT O. BUTNER52. CADEWCH53. CARLO CALANDRA54. KELLY CASLAR55. MILAGROS CEDANO56. RICHARD CENTENO57. DIANA MARIE CHAPMAN58. CHRIS – FREEDOM FIGHTERS FOR AMERICA59. LEE LYNN CHRISTIANSON60. CHRISTINA61. ROMY COCHRAN62. GREGORY COUSINS63. ACKSON COYET64. LESLIE L. CRAWFORD65. MARY CROCKETT66. MARY CROOK67. OPHNELL CUMBERBATCH68. VALERIE CUTLER69. D70. N D71. WANDA AND SARA DABLIN72. DAVID73. DEEPNDARK74. D DEERWOMAN75. ANDY DE LORENZO76. Raúl Luis DEL VALLE77. ROBERT ALAN DESROSIERS78. BETH DONAHUE79. ALLAN CARLOS DOS SANTOS80. DR PHIL81. GERRY DUFFETT82. DR ROBERT DUNCAN83. DONALD DUNLAP84. BOB G DUNLAP85. CINDY DYER86. DICK EASTMAN87. HELEN EDWARD88. TARGET ELEPHANT89. SAM EVANS90. DOUGLAS EVERMAN91. RAISA EYDELMAN92. MARY FAIR93. PAM FARNSWORTH94. SCOTT FITZGERALD95. DONALD FOSTER96. KEVIN FOWLER97. KATHLEENE SUSAN FRANCIS98. GEORGE FRANK & FAMILY99. DON FRIEDMAN100. FUTUREBUISNESS101. BILL GALLAGHER102. LYN GALLAGHER103. HERBERT GARTNER104. DARREN GELBARD105. GENA aka FREEDOM106. EDGAR G GILLHAM107. PAUL GOLDING-CLARK108. DAVIDA GOLDMAN109. FLORA GOLTSMAN110. RAFAEL GONZALEZ111. ERIC R GOODMAN112. MARY GOODWIN113. AARON GOODWIN114. GORDON115. JAMES HENRY GRAF116. ERIC GRIFFIN117. SHERI GRUTZ118. ERIC H119. MARGARET HABIB120. MIKAL HALEY121. DEB HALL AND SON122. DR JOHN HALL123. JIMMY HALLER124. JENNIFER HANNA125. JONATHAN C HANSEN126. MOLLY R. HARDIN & DEE HARDIN127. CHRISTINE LYNN HARRIS128. NAOMI HARRIS129. RONALD HAUCKE130. LEE HAWTHORNE131. KATHLEEN T. HECKMAN132. RAFAEL HERNANDEZ JR133. DORIS HICKS134. CHRIS HOLDEN135. DR. LYNNIE MARIE HOLM, M.A., Ph.D.136. SUSAN HONAKER & FAMILY137. ANGELA HOOD138. MOSTAFA HOSNY139. ROSARIO HOUSEHOLDER (MARA)140. MICHELLE HOWARD141. BRIDGET S. HOWE142. JULIE HOWELL143. HUGGLES144. JOHN HUGHES145. MARLENA HUGHES146. MARK IANNICELLI aka. Muhammad Iannicelli, aka MuhammadLi,147. INTERIQ148. “IQPRISONER”149. JACK150. PHILLIP JACKSON151. RICHARD DEAN JACOB152. JALBY153. JANIS154. JEANNIE155. JENNIFER156. JIM157. JILLYJOHNSON158. MARY JOHNSON159. JON160. GEORGE JONES161. MARK JONES162. STEVEN JONES163. VICTORIA JONES164. T. JOSEPHINE165. JUNE166. KEVIN JUNIOR167. KATHI168. THE KATS FAMILY169. JOE KEEGAN170. KEITH171. ARLENE KEITH172. TANYA KELLER173. KEVIN174. SHAFIQ KHAN175. KIM176. KIMBERLI177. PATRICIA A. KINSELLA178. NICHOLAS KIRKLAND179. THOMAS J. KLUEGEL180. LINDA KMIOTEK181. TREVOR KOKOTYLO182. KOMMY183. VICTORIA KUPHALL184. GALINA KURDINA185. JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS186. GARY N LANDRY187. EDGAR R. LAVERDE188. DONALD LEE aka the Shadowillowist, Geshe Roache Lee189. MARCIA LEE190. NADINE LEE191. JANET LEIH192. CASSANDRA LEWIS193. JENNIFER LICHY194. JOHN M LITO195. VICTOR LIVINGSTON196. STEPHEN LONG197. RAMONA LOPEZ198. RENE LOSADA199. ROGER R. LOWE200. C C M & FAMILY201. BARRY MADISON202. WAYNE MADSEN203. CHRISTINE MAGIOTTO204. SANDRA L MAIZLAND205. CECILIA MALLON206. WAYNE MANZO207. BRUNO MARCHESANI208. STEFANO MARESCOTTI209. JAMES F. MARINO210. JON MASON211. MICHAEL A MATLOFF212. A J MCKAY213. FRED McKENNA214. DARREN C MCMAHON215. BRIAN MCNATT216. JOHN MECCA & DEBBIE LAMB217. MICHELLE MELLEMA218. MEMORIALS OF 7 MIND CONTROL AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPON VICTIMS219. LYNN MENDES220. JESUS MENDOZA221. BARRY MICHAEL222. NANCY MILLER223. MELODY MINEO224. FERNANDO ARAKAKI MIRANDA225. CINDY MITCHUM226. ABSHIR MOHAMED227. AMIR MOHAMADI228. M. ALEX MOLARO229. RICHARD MONGEON230. KATRIANA MONTEITH (SOLARIS BLUE RAVEN)231. DAN MONTGOMERY232. DANIEL L. MOORE233. KATHERINE MOORE234. DANIEL MORGAN AND FAMILY – LORNA, NICOLE, PATRICIA, CHRISTOPHER, DYLAN, AVERY235. ANGELA MORGAN236. CAROLYN MORIYAMA237. JANICE MORTON238. CINTHIA MARIANA MOSCOSO239. VICTOR N. MOTURI240. MASSIE MUNRO241. CHUCK MURPHY242. DENISE MYLES AND BROTHER243. T N244. KAMRAN NAQVI245. GLORIA NAYLOR246. BRYAN NAZAM247. CONNIE NEAL248. KERRI NEAL249. NEBRASKA - 6 YR TARGETED INDIVIDUAL250. DEBBIE N., FAMILY & FRIENDS251. N N252. RICHARD NOEN253. MAUREEN NORMAN254. TIMOTHY A. NORMAN255. L O256. CAROLYN PALIT257. TERRY PARKER JR. /AKA ROBERTSON258. PAMELA PARKER259. DELLY PELC260. ROBERTO PEREIRA261. WELLINGTON ANTONIO DONINELLI PEREIRA262. RICHARD PERLMAN263. CHRISTOPHER PHILLIP264. ARIEL FELICE PHILLIPS265. MARCIA PINHEIRO266. DENISE S. POMPL267. POW268. SKIZIT POWER269. TOM PRACINOS270. BYRON PRIOR & FAMILY271. ANDREA PSORAS272. MARY R273. NORMAN R RABIN274. ELLEN RACIOPPI-DAY275. KELLY RASMUSSEN276. DEAN RAY277. KELLY RAY278. REFLECT279. CHARLES REHN JNR IV280. RHONDA281. TIM RIFAT282. ROBERT283. ROBERT – 2284. CARLOS RODRIGUES285. HELEN ROEDRIG286. R. S. ROGERS287. MR AND MRS GARRY ROMANIK288. PAUL ROSE289. VICTORIA ROSE290. PETER ROSENHOLM291. JUSTICE RUIZ292. D S293. PIERRE SAMSON294. MELISSA SANDERSON295. LUCIA SANTOS & FAMILY296. JILL SAWYER297. SARAH SCHAEFFER298. STEFAN A. SCHOELLMANN299. DELISA SCHOOLER300. DOROTHY SCHULTZ301. BEVERLY A. SCHWEITZER302. BOB SDEWTELL303. SHELLY304. RYAN SHIELDS305. BBOY SKATE306. SLATEBREAKERS307. DAVID SMITH308. STEPHEN SMITH309. MIRIAM SNYDER310. DR CARLOS SOSA M.D.311. GERAL SOSBEE312. CARL SPERR313. ARCHIE STAFFORD314. STEPHEN315. STEPHEN316. MARIE STEVENS317. PAT STEWART318. CHRIS STUDIO & GIRLFRIEND319. KRISSI STULL320. ANNE SUCHARSKI321. ANDRZEJ SUDA322. SUE323. LYNN SURGALLA324. SUSPICIOUS DEATHS OF WRITERS AND JOURNALISTS WHO INVESTIGATED MINDCONTROL CRIMES/ MUERTES SOSPECHOSAS DE PERIODISTAS SOBRE CONTROL MENTAL325. ROBERT SWEGAN326. DOROTHY SZCZEPKOWSKI327. B T328. ADAM TAMBLE329. GRIMS TAROEEL330. LOLITA TAYLOR331. TERESA TAYLOR332. TEKMASTER333. MICHAEL TERRY334. MARSHALL THOMAS335. BETH TIOXIN336. TONY337. CHRISTOPHER LAMONT TRICE338. JOSHUA TRITT339. LYN TROXEL340. ANNA TSENTSIPER341. TORRANCE TURNER342. SAMEER USHER343. URI AKA DOCTOR NO.344. DON VALENTINE345. CHAD VANDERGRIFF346. DR CASSANDRA VAN NOSTRAND347. THÉRÈSE VERSAILLES348. RENA VETTLESON349. JAMES M. VIERLING JR.350. BAY RIDGE VIETNAM351. J L VITT352. MARY VIVIAN, MARLENE VIVIAN AND FLORENCE VIVIAN353. VON KIDD354. PETER K.VOSOUGH355. JAMES WALBERT & FAMILY356. TIMOTHY WAITE357. ROBERT WALKER358. FELICIA WARD359. MARK WATERHOUSE360. STEW WEBB361. LUCIAN WEBER362. DR ALFRED WEBRE363. MICHAEL WEGRZYN364. CLARE WEHRLE365. DOMINIE WELCH366. JOHN WELLS367. TERRY WENTZELL368. ELEANOR WHITE369. TIMOTHY WHITE370. GLENDA WHITEMAN371. ANN WILLIAMS372. STEVE WILSON373. ROBERT WOOD374. BRIAN WRONGE375. KAIS YACOUB376. GEORGE ZACHYSTAL377. IDA ZAMANSKAYA378. ANANDA ZAREN379. CHRIS ZUCKEREUROPE1. SHOMAN D. ADEH2. GABRIELE ALTENDORF3. HERBERT ALTENDORF4. JÜRGEN ALTENDORF5. BRIGITTE ALTHOF6. BABAK AMIREBRAHIMI7. VIVIANE, BEN AND RACHAEL ANAMUAH8. ANATOLIJ9. RUDY ANDRIA10. ANN11. DENNIS ARNOLD & YASMIN JEREMY12. NAMAN ASGHAR & FAMILY13. AZA14. MOJMIR BABACEK15. WALTRAUB BABL16. STEPHEN BAKER17. REZA BAYAT18. JENNIFER BERKEMEIER19. DENIZ BESIM20. JEAN-PAUL BOLEA21. BRIAN22. STEVEN CALVEY & PETER W MARTIN23. ALFREDO NIETO CENTENO24. ALJOSA CERNE25. “CHICKEN”26. MICHAEL CHMELIK27. JØRGEN CHRISTIANSEN28. CARL CLARK29. JOHN CLIFTOZ30. ANDREW COLE31. JEAN-NOEL CORDOLIANI32. DAVID COULSON33. KARLHEINZ CROISSANT34. STAN CUMANS35. DANIELA36. DARRIM & FAMILY37. MARIA PAULA ONOFRE DAS NEVES38. PETRIT DEMO39. BEN DEMPSEY40. NANS DESMICHELS41. KATHERINE DE SOUZA42. R. DIECKMANN43. FEJERVARY DOMINIK44. OVIDIU DONCIU45. PAOLO DORIGO46. DR LES DOVE47. LINDA DREW48. CAROL DUKE49. MARTIN EMMEN50. ESTEBAN51. DEVON FOWLER52. KATHERINE FRIEDLI53. AB FRIS54. ASTRID FUCHS55. SIGRUN GEBHARDT56. PRICOPI GELU57. ANI GEWALT58. RUTH GILL59. RAY GOEBEL60. OXANA GRUNWALD & FAMILY61. GUMIND62. GYBFEFE63. SIMON HAYES64. JOHAN HELLER65. PETER HELWIG66. STEIN E HENRIKSEN67. REGINALD HODGES68. TON HOOGEBOOM AND GERARD HOOGEBOOM69. AREND TER HORST70. HUGGLES71. MERV HUGHES72. CLIFF HUYLEBROECK73. JOANNA IATRIDOU74. INA75. LINDA JANE INCE76. MICHAEL IRVING77. ITALY - OVER 60 VICTIMS78. JULIAN JACKSON79. DOSSIER JOSEPHINE80. DANIELA K81. MAURICE KELLETT82. DEREK KINMOND83. BRIGITTE KLAUS84. J.KLAWATSCH85. MATTHIAS KLEIN86. JAN KREWINKEL87. IRMGARD KRONSBEIN-BELLCHAMBERS & FAMILY88. PETER KUTZA89. AUDRIUS KVILIUNAS90. SERGE LABRÈZE91. GAGIU IULIAN LAURENTIU92. PERNES LAURENTIU93. HENRY LICHTERFELDT94. LINDA95. FALLON LIPSCOMB96. BARTLOMIEJ LISTWAN97. FILIPPO LOMBARDO98. TATJANA LOTZ99. WALDEMAR LOTZ100. FERNANDO SANTAMARIA LOZANO101. FRANCES ANN LUFF102. A M103. MARIUS M104. WALTER MADLIGER105. JARKKO MAKKONEN106. MARA107. LUKE MARSH108. RAMON MARTINEZ109. CHRISTINE MARX110. BRIGITTE MATTE111. MATTERWAVE112. BERND MEERKAMP113. CATHERINE MILLS & FAMILY114. DARIUS MOCKUS115. VICTOR MONCHAMP116. THIERRY MOUTON117. JEAN MULLAN118. C N119. SARUNAS NEKRASIUS120. MAUREEN NORMAN121. IMELDA O' CONNOR122. DEBBIE PARTRIDGE123. LIDIA POPOVA124. NADIE PRIEUR125. DRAGINJA NATASHA PUSICH126. CAROL RAE127. WILLIAM RAE128. RANDOLPH129. REDMANN130. RICK131. KAREN RODDY132. RONALD133. FABRIZIO ROVEDI134. KLAUS RUDOLF135. JACQUELINE SALII136. RUUT SALO137. PAUL SAUNDERSON138. PAOLA SBRONZERI139. ROBERTO SCARUFFI140. SWETLANA SCHUNIN AND FAMILY – DIMITRI, SERGEY, DMITRI141. ANGELINA SCHWEYEN142. SIMON143. SIRBILLGATESJNR144. RICHARD SLUITER145. CAROL SMITH146. JAVIER RUIZ SOBRINO147. MONIKA SOKAL148. WALDTRAUT SRERNITZKE149. KIM STIRLING & FAMILY150. MONIKA STOCES151. REGINA STOLL152. SUSPICIOUS DEATHS OF WRITERS AND JOURNALISTS WHO INVESTIGATED MINDCONTROL CRIMES/ MUERTES SOSPECHOSAS DE PERIODISTAS SOBRE CONTROL MENTAL153. ROBERT SWEGAN154. TI29187155. MO TAHANI156. FRANCIS TAILOKA157. NATALIE TEULON158. TARA TILLY (THOMAS RITA)159. HELMUT TONDL160. SAHAR TORKY161. INGRID TREMEL162. UK163. UN JEUNE INGENIEUR164. EMILIA MARIA VAZ-MARCH165. JEAN VERSTRAETEN166. JACQUES VUILLOD167. TRACIE WALKER168. WATERFALL169. RANDOLF WEINAND170. SABINA WOHLWEND171. MAIRE WOLF172. CHRISTINA WYATT173. ZENBEL174. OVER 60 VICTIMS FROM ITALYCHINA & ASIA-PACIFIC1. AN ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE WHOLE WORLD BY OVER 50 CHINESE VICTIMS2. JOHN AIDMANN3. ah2006-cwy 天涯无处寻4. ALEX5. ahzsp26126. BAIBING (aka 2010lf)7. PAUL BAIRD8. 白云 BAIYUN0249. MR SHIJIE CAO10. CHAH00111. SHINE CHANG12. QIJIA CHENG13. CHINA – 62 VICTIMS14. DANIEL COLGAN15. CONNIE16. STEVE CROFT17. RAJ D18. HAI DANG19. DAVIS20. MARGARET DOWN21. DRAGANOVIC22. DEBORAH DUPRE23. JOHN FINCH & FAMILY & NEIGHBOURS24. FRANKY25. JAMES YUE GEE26. JOSEPH GIBSON27. MIYOKO GOTO28. TAKAHIRO GOTO29. LISA H30. KYUNG-GUK HA31. JOHN HANDLEY32. HARUKA33. hongzx34. ZHANG HUIMIN35. imary66061036. 来自 jiaodian902的自动回复37. JUNG, IL SUN38. jinyi69100139. THOMAS KOH40. TERUYUKI KURAHASHI41. GEORGE KWONG42. laofa9943. LEE44. JUDITH LESUE45. LI GUAN-PING46. WEI LI47. lijing689848. lilylinxin49. MIKEY LIU50. XIN LIU51. LUCIA52. SUZY M53. MR WENLONG MA ((IVAN)54. MABEL55. BETH MACLEAN56. LIZ MCCLELLAN57. DAVID LUKE MENDHAM58. MOKUREN59. PHIL MOON60. OSHANA161. KHANH DAC PHAM62. MOREEN PHILLIPS63. Pp64. pys62465. XIN ZHONG QING66. HAROLD B QUIBAN67. RAYMOND68. ANDREW ROBINSON69. MISS RUQUAN-GUO70. GARY D SIMMONS71. XIN WANG SHEN鏉ヨ嚜鐨勮嚜鍔ㄥ洖澶72. SOLEILMAVIS73. ELIZABETH ANNE SUTHERTON74. 鐜嬬嚂 tclwyy75. 3crobot76. 3V3NG3LA77. TONY TU78. WORARAT TUMMALUCKSAMEE79. LIZA VELUZ80. WWW2006BAILIU81. MISS XIAN-SUN (RINOA)82. SHENGLIN YI83. YINGLI84. “KELLY” TANG ZHAO85. 523062953@qq.comINDIA, THE MIDDLE-EAST & AFRICA1. F. A.2. NADA ABBAS3. ANNE4. DEB CHAKRABORTY5. RAJ D6. AHMAD FANI7. ABDURAHMAN HUSSIEN MOHAMED ISLAAM8. DEEPTHI JOHN9. RAHUL S JOSHI10. SIMRAN SINGH JUNEJA11. SHAFIQ KHAN12. SHIJU KRISHNA13. SURESH S. KUMAR14. TERUYUKI KURAHASHI15. MAHESHKUMAR16. PATRICIA MILLER17. OM_NAMASHIVA18. OTILLIA19. PARIKSHIT PATHAK20. DR FEISAL SALIMRUSSIA, UKRAINE & BELARUS1. AGAFFONOV Pavel2. ALBERT (девятин сергей)3. ALEKSEYEV Igor Georgievich4. ALEVTINA Pawlowna Gudzenko5. BASHKOVSKIY Vladimir6. BELARUS – OVER 14 CASES7. BOLOTSKIY Sergey8. BORODIENKO Vladimir9. NATALIA BYCHKOVA10. DANILOV Victor Yegorovich11. DOMOJIROVA Tatyana Kondratyevna & Family12. DRUZHININA Irina Vladimirovna & Family13. EREMIN Andrey14. ERMAKOV Vladimir Petrovich15. EVGENIA FILIPPOVA16. FROLOV Sergey Timofejevich & Family17. GALANIN Vitaly Ivanovich18. JUNOSHEVA Valentine19. KANDYBIN Edward Nikolayevich20. KATSERIKOVA Galina Ivanovna & Family21. KOCHETOVA Natalia Ivanovna22. KONDRATOVA Svetlana Vasilyevna & Family23. KOPYLOVA Liliy24. KOSTROVA Liy25. KOZLOV Valentin Alekseyevich & Family26. LEVINA Anna Petrovna27. PAVLOVSKY Grigoriy Fedorovich28. PETUKHOV Vitaly29. PETUKHOVA Alla Yakovlevna & Family30. PRODIUS Gennady31. PROHANOV Jury32. PROHANOVA Margarita33. REDKINA Swetlana34. ROMANENKO Galina35. ROZANCHUK Margarita Ivanovna & Family36. RYBIN Pyotr Lukich , RYBINA Alexandra Filippovna & Family37. SAMSONOV Nick38. SEREBRYAKOVA Ljubov39. SOSHINA NÁdÅjidÁ40. DMITRY SUCHKOV41. TORIN Sergei42. TRETIAKOVA Tamara Vitalievna, son Mikhail & Family43. VLADIMIR44. VORONTSOV Vladimir Borisovich45. VORONTSOVA Swetlana46. ZYBINA Nadejida PyotrovnaWE ARE BEING COOPTED AND FORCED AND TRICKED INTO AN ORWELLIAN FUNCTIONALIST TOTALITARIANISM – EVERYWHERE ON EARTH! - as almost all public discourses including ‘scientific’, ‘academic’ and ‘arts and culture’, and as much as 80% of ‘international news’, ‘events’ and ‘history’, have been degraded into produced and managed dramas/atrocities (i.e. wars, disasters, civil strife etc), and criminally presented as infotainment, endogenous socio-political changes, propaganda, pseudo-sciences and/or specious, tendentious or folkloric productions and discourses.Regarding these NWO Crimes Against Humanity, War Crimes, Dirty Wars, Black Operations, Secret Weapons, Destruction of Democratic Institutions and Standards, Total Degradation of Media and Public Discourses, Total Degradation and Disenfranchisement of Civil Society and Institutions there is a complete ORWELLIAN/STALINIST PUBLIC INFORMATION AND INQUIRY BLACKOUT.It is our responsibility to record and alert the world to these horrendous crimes - and the extreme danger that these technologies, powers and tendencies pose to human rights, liberty, democracy, privacy and the mental and physical freedom, individuality, integrity, health and growth of all people – in all their “infinite?” richness, degrees, dimensions, aspects, qualities and diversity!Make no mistake these are the most horrendous totalitarian weapons and crimes imaginable and the people and organizations using them are mass-murdering conspirators pursuing totalitarian fundamentalist schemes.Beware of the brain and gene phrenologists/determinists/reductionists, and those who seek to control and reduce the range, quality and diversity of human thoughts, imaginations, senses, sensibilities, moods, attitudes, speech and psycho-physiologies – the would-be socio-economic, cultural AND PSYCHOLOGICAL/INTELLECTUAL/ PHYSIOLOGICAL monopolists, monoculturalists, police and prosecutors who are already literally and physically actively at work amongst us!! Both monstrously and criminally, and also far more insidiously.And beware of this dumbing-down, disenfranchisement, degradation and monoculturalisation caused by the paucity and total degradation of public information and discourse, and the subsequent and consequent “Fahrenheit 451-ing” of previously autonomous cultures, professions, fields of human endeavour, memories, and intelligences.BEWARE OF THE PSEUDO-SCIENCE NAZIS - THE ENEMIES OF FREE AND OPEN INFORMATION AND DEBATE, ACCOUNTABILITY, REVIEW AND REGULATION.NOT TO MENTION THE NUTCASES PURSUING SUCH FRANKENSTEIN-SCIENCES AS THE TRANSGENIC, AND THE “BLENDING” OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL AND BIOLOGICAL– EVEN AS RECORD BIODIVERSITY AND CULTURAL DIVERSITY DESTRUCTION IS DONE.PLEASE WITNESS AND RECORD AND OPPOSE ALL OF THE ABOVE CRIMES, AND ASSIST US URGENTLY!!
Read more…
From: Fred NietzTo: president@whitehouse.gov; barack_obama@obama.senate.gov; Robert_Gibbs@Obama.Senate.gov; bill_burton@obama.senate.gov; tommy_vietor@obama.senate.gov; info@barackobama.com; legal@barackobama.com; media@barackobama.com; comments@whitehouse.gov; vice_president@whitehouse.gov; senator@biden.senate.gov; elizabeth_alexander@biden.senate.gov; info@hillaryclinton.com; Senator_Clinton@clinton.senate.gov; senator@clinton.senate.gov; webmail@clinton-iq.senate.govCc: lorraine_voles@clinton.senate.gov; Philippe_Reines@Clinton.Senate.gov; hwolfson@gloverparkgroup.com; webmaster@jnlwp.com; howard_wolfson@clinton.senate.gov; josh_albert@clinton.senate.gov; laurie_rubiner@clinton.senate.gov; president@cfr.org; cmassey@cfr.org; nyao@cfr.org; communications@cfr.org; aschmemann@cfr.org; sweeks@cfr.org; mbrouwer@cfr.org; lkrapf@cfr.org; nsinha@cfr.org; napelian@cfr.org; sdoolin@cfr.org; membership@cfr.org; fellowships@cfr.org; meetings@cfr.org; knash@cfr.org; dcmeetings@cfr.org; national@cfr.org; bgude@cfr.org; pdorff@cfr.org; webmaster@cfr.orgSent: Wednesday, August 5, 2009 9:15:39 PMSubject: TO THE LEADERS OF THE USA - over 950 DIRECTED ENERGY AND NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONS, AND ORGANISED STALKING, TORTURE AND ABUSE CASES6 August 2009TO THE LEADERS OF THE USAHere is the link to our over 950 DIRECTED ENERGY AND NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONS, AND ORGANISED STALKING, TORTURE, DEGRADATION AND MUTILATION VICTIMS' CASE SUMMARIES FOR YOU TO WITNESS, RECORD AND OPPOSE -http://www.freedrive.com/folder/177784 ORhttp://www.mydrive.ch username – johnfinch password - TORTURECASESSome of our DIRECTED ENERGY AND NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONS, AND ORGANISED STALKING TORTURE AND ABUSE CASES detail the most extreme and totalitarian violations of human rights in human history, including the most horrendous psychological tortures, rapes, sexual abuse, surgical mutilations, ‘mind control’, and other mental and physical mutilations – see http://www.freedrive.com/folder/177784 ORhttp://www.mydrive.ch username – johnfinch password - TORTURECASESThere are MANY, MANY others, all over the world, who are being subjected to similar torture and abuse – citizens, combatants and leaders (‘suicide bombers’, coup-de-etats and puppet governments, literally).YOU HAVE BEEN CHOSEN TO BE “A SELECTED WITNESS” to these are extreme and monstrous CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY – indescribably terrible in themselves – coupled with the ORWELLIAN/STALINIST secrecy and denial of any support at all that we are experiencing, makes them even more horrendous and monstrous.We have contacted most Governments, Security/Intelligence Agencies, Religious Organisations, International Organizations, Human Rights Organizations, Universities, Scientific and other Institutions, and the International Media all over the world - over and over and over again – and have had our appeals for assistance, protection and/or publicity almost completely ignored and/or suppressed.Some TARGETED INDIVIDUALS have been attempting to gain assistance, protection and/or publicity about these crimes since the 1990s - and even earlier - this extends as far back into the history of illegal "scientific and medical" testing and experimentation as MKULTRA and the DUPLESSIS ORPHANS - and further.We are still collecting CASE SUMMARIES from TARGETED INDIVIDUALS all over the world, and we have also advised them to send them to you – “THE SELECTED WITNESSES” - TO WITNESS, RECORD AND OPPOSE so that :-A. We can be sure that as many people as possible know about these horrendous crimes.B. We can be sure that these AUTHORITIES and ORGANISATIONS are either trying to uphold the rule of National, International and Human Rights Law, and that we will, sooner or later, be protected by these laws.C. Or that we can be sure these AUTHORITIES and ORGANISATIONS are complicit and/or acquiescent to these CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY and that National, International and Human Rights Law no longer apply - in which case our task will be to get the rule of these laws restored.Later these records should become an information source - such as the INTERNATIONAL TRACING OFFICE set up to record the fates and whereabouts of Jews (and others?) after WW11. The information collected can then be used by the appropriate people for LEGAL, MEDICAL, WELFARE, HISTORICAL etc. records.As well as being illegal the crimes being committed against us are contrary to the Principles and Values of all the major religions and ethical systems - so we will also be demonstrating to all of these people and AUTHORITIES AND ORGANISATIONS the huge disconnect between their professed Principles and Values and the reality. We will be showing their monstrous Doublespeak Doublethink Doubledo ignorance, stupidity and/or hypocrisy.It is our responsibility to record and alert the world to these horrendous crimes - and the extreme danger that these technologies, powers and tendencies pose to human rights, liberty, democracy, privacy and the mental and physical freedom, individuality, integrity, health and growth of all people – in all their “infinite?” richness, degrees, dimensions, aspects, qualities and diversity!Make no mistake these are the most horrendous totalitarian weapons and crimes imaginable and the people and organizations using them are mass-murdering conspirators pursuing totalitarian fundamentalist schemes.Beware of the brain and gene phrenologists/determinists/reductionists, and those who seek to control and reduce the range, quality and diversity of human thoughts, imaginations, senses, sensibilities, moods, attitudes, speech and psycho-physiologies – the would-be socio-economic, cultural AND PSYCHOLOGICAL/INTELLECTUAL/ PHYSIOLOGICAL monopolists, monoculturalists, police and prosecutors who are already literally and physically actively at work amongst us!! Both monstrously and criminally, and also far more insidiously.And beware of this dumbing-down, disenfranchisement, degradation and monoculturalisation caused by the paucity and total degradation of public information and discourse, and the subsequent and consequent destruction of previously autonomous cultures, professions, fields of human endeavour, memories, and intelligences.NOT TO MENTION THE NUTCASES PURSUING SUCH FRANKENSTEIN-SCIENCES AS THE TRANSGENIC, AND THE “BLENDING” OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL AND BIOLOGICAL– EVEN AS RECORD BIODIVERSITY AND CULTURAL DIVERSITY DESTRUCTION IS DONE.It is no exaggeration to say our cases are as horrendous and urgent as people fleeing Nazi or Pol Pot concentration camps – specifically Dr Mengele-type butchers.We urgently need access to SAFE HOUSES to get protection from the directed energy and neurological weapons being used to torture, mutilate and kill US.Such SAFE HOUSES are available in Laboratories, Hospitals and Scientific/Military Facilities.PLEASE ASSIST US URGENTLY!!!PLEASE CONTACT US FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:-Yours in the search for openness and respect for universal human rightsJohn FinchMAIL: 5/8 Kemp St, Thornbury, Vic 3071, Australia, TEL: 0424009627EMAIL: tijohnfinch@gmail.com , MCmailteam@gmail.comTARGETED INDIVIDUAL and a member of THE WORLDWIDE CAMPAIGN AGAINST TORTURE, DEGRADATION AND MUTILATION USING DIRECTED ENERGY AND NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONSOur (very, very partial) LIST OF VICTIMS OF DIRECTED ENERGY & NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONS:-the link to our OVER 950 DIRECTED ENERGY AND NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONS, AND ORGANISED STALKING, TORTURE, DEGRADATION AND MUTILATION VICTIMS' CASE SUMMARIEShttp://www.freedrive.com/folder/177784 ORhttp://www.mydrive.ch username – johnfinch password - TORTURECASESTHE AMERICAS1. 13 VICTIMS FROM USA2. 3V3NG3LA3. ELIZABETH ADAMS4. AKU5. al236. NEAL ALCHALABI (NEAL CHAMBERS)7. ALETA8. GARY ALGAR9. CARLOS AMADOR10. TIM ANDERSON11. ANGELA12. ANGELICA13. RON ANGELL14. JUSTIN ANGIERS15. ANN16. ARIZONA - 6 VIGILANTE/ELECTRONIC HARASSMENT VICTIMS17. ANNYCE ARNTZEN18. RANDY ARRASMITH19. SUE ANNE ARRIGO MD FORMER SPECIAL OPERATIONS ADVISOR TO DIRECTORS OF CIA, FORMER INTELLIGENCE ADVISOR TO THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF IN 2003-2004, ASSIGNED A RANK OF A 2-STAR GENERAL.20. ARTHUR21. AARON AVALOS22. AZMAT (AKA NICK)23. DEVORAH BAKER24. LINDSAY G. BALDWIN25. VERNON WAYNE BALL26. KHMER BARANG27. BRENDA BARAQUIL28. A B29. KAY BARNES30. ERIC BARTLETT31. ERIC BAZAN32. DAVID ALAN BEACH33. MATT BEAL34. PAUL BEGGS35. SHERRY BELL36. MARILYN BERRY37. STACEY BERRY38. KATA BILLUPS39. BIOLOGICAL-ELECTRONIC EPIDEMY40. BARBARA BLACKBURN41. KAYLON BLACKBURN42. JOHN BRASWELL43. ALMA BRECKENRIDGE44. DAVID BRINSKO45. LAURIE BRODIE46. EMILIO BRUGUEROS47. BETH BUCHANAN48. MARC BURNELL49. KEVIN BURNOR50. ROBERT BUTLER51. ROBERT O. BUTNER52. CADEWCH53. CARLO CALANDRA54. KELLY CASLAR55. MILAGROS CEDANO56. RICHARD CENTENO57. DIANA MARIE CHAPMAN58. CHRIS – FREEDOM FIGHTERS FOR AMERICA59. LEE LYNN CHRISTIANSON60. CHRISTINA61. ROMY COCHRAN62. GREGORY COUSINS63. ACKSON COYET64. LESLIE L. CRAWFORD65. MARY CROCKETT66. MARY CROOK67. OPHNELL CUMBERBATCH68. VALERIE CUTLER69. D70. N D71. WANDA AND SARA DABLIN72. DAVID73. DEEPNDARK74. D DEERWOMAN75. ANDY DE LORENZO76. Raúl Luis DEL VALLE77. ROBERT ALAN DESROSIERS78. BETH DONAHUE79. ALLAN CARLOS DOS SANTOS80. DR PHIL81. GERRY DUFFETT82. DR ROBERT DUNCAN83. DONALD DUNLAP84. BOB G DUNLAP85. CINDY DYER86. DICK EASTMAN87. HELEN EDWARD88. TARGET ELEPHANT89. SAM EVANS90. DOUGLAS EVERMAN91. RAISA EYDELMAN92. MARY FAIR93. PAM FARNSWORTH94. SCOTT FITZGERALD95. DONALD FOSTER96. KEVIN FOWLER97. KATHLEENE SUSAN FRANCIS98. GEORGE FRANK & FAMILY99. DON FRIEDMAN100. FUTUREBUISNESS101. BILL GALLAGHER102. LYN GALLAGHER103. HERBERT GARTNER104. DARREN GELBARD105. GENA aka FREEDOM106. EDGAR G GILLHAM107. PAUL GOLDING-CLARK108. DAVIDA GOLDMAN109. FLORA GOLTSMAN110. RAFAEL GONZALEZ111. ERIC R GOODMAN112. MARY GOODWIN113. AARON GOODWIN114. GORDON115. JAMES HENRY GRAF116. ERIC GRIFFIN117. SHERI GRUTZ118. ERIC H119. MARGARET HABIB120. MIKAL HALEY121. DEB HALL AND SON122. DR JOHN HALL123. JIMMY HALLER124. JENNIFER HANNA125. JONATHAN C HANSEN126. MOLLY R. HARDIN & DEE HARDIN127. CHRISTINE LYNN HARRIS128. NAOMI HARRIS129. RONALD HAUCKE130. LEE HAWTHORNE131. KATHLEEN T. HECKMAN132. RAFAEL HERNANDEZ JR133. DORIS HICKS134. CHRIS HOLDEN135. DR. LYNNIE MARIE HOLM, M.A., Ph.D.136. SUSAN HONAKER & FAMILY137. ANGELA HOOD138. MOSTAFA HOSNY139. ROSARIO HOUSEHOLDER (MARA)140. MICHELLE HOWARD141. BRIDGET S. HOWE142. JULIE HOWELL143. HUGGLES144. JOHN HUGHES145. MARLENA HUGHES146. MARK IANNICELLI aka. Muhammad Iannicelli, aka MuhammadLi,147. INTERIQ148. “IQPRISONER”149. JACK150. PHILLIP JACKSON151. RICHARD DEAN JACOB152. JALBY153. JANIS154. JEANNIE155. JENNIFER156. JIM157. JILLYJOHNSON158. MARY JOHNSON159. JON160. GEORGE JONES161. MARK JONES162. STEVEN JONES163. VICTORIA JONES164. T. JOSEPHINE165. JUNE166. KEVIN JUNIOR167. KATHI168. THE KATS FAMILY169. JOE KEEGAN170. KEITH171. ARLENE KEITH172. TANYA KELLER173. KEVIN174. SHAFIQ KHAN175. KIM176. KIMBERLI177. PATRICIA A. KINSELLA178. NICHOLAS KIRKLAND179. THOMAS J. KLUEGEL180. LINDA KMIOTEK181. TREVOR KOKOTYLO182. KOMMY183. VICTORIA KUPHALL184. GALINA KURDINA185. JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS186. GARY N LANDRY187. EDGAR R. LAVERDE188. DONALD LEE aka the Shadowillowist, Geshe Roache Lee189. MARCIA LEE190. NADINE LEE191. JANET LEIH192. CASSANDRA LEWIS193. JENNIFER LICHY194. JOHN M LITO195. VICTOR LIVINGSTON196. STEPHEN LONG197. RAMONA LOPEZ198. RENE LOSADA199. ROGER R. LOWE200. C C M & FAMILY201. BARRY MADISON202. WAYNE MADSEN203. CHRISTINE MAGIOTTO204. SANDRA L MAIZLAND205. CECILIA MALLON206. WAYNE MANZO207. BRUNO MARCHESANI208. STEFANO MARESCOTTI209. JAMES F. MARINO210. JON MASON211. MICHAEL A MATLOFF212. A J MCKAY213. FRED McKENNA214. DARREN C MCMAHON215. BRIAN MCNATT216. JOHN MECCA & DEBBIE LAMB217. MICHELLE MELLEMA218. MEMORIALS OF 7 MIND CONTROL AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPON VICTIMS219. LYNN MENDES220. JESUS MENDOZA221. BARRY MICHAEL222. NANCY MILLER223. MELODY MINEO224. FERNANDO ARAKAKI MIRANDA225. CINDY MITCHUM226. ABSHIR MOHAMED227. AMIR MOHAMADI228. M. ALEX MOLARO229. RICHARD MONGEON230. KATRIANA MONTEITH (SOLARIS BLUE RAVEN)231. DAN MONTGOMERY232. DANIEL L. MOORE233. KATHERINE MOORE234. DANIEL MORGAN AND FAMILY – LORNA, NICOLE, PATRICIA, CHRISTOPHER, DYLAN, AVERY235. ANGELA MORGAN236. CAROLYN MORIYAMA237. JANICE MORTON238. CINTHIA MARIANA MOSCOSO239. VICTOR N. MOTURI240. MASSIE MUNRO241. CHUCK MURPHY242. DENISE MYLES AND BROTHER243. T N244. KAMRAN NAQVI245. GLORIA NAYLOR246. BRYAN NAZAM247. CONNIE NEAL248. KERRI NEAL249. NEBRASKA - 6 YR TARGETED INDIVIDUAL250. DEBBIE N., FAMILY & FRIENDS251. N N252. RICHARD NOEN253. MAUREEN NORMAN254. TIMOTHY A. NORMAN255. L O256. CAROLYN PALIT257. TERRY PARKER JR. /AKA ROBERTSON258. PAMELA PARKER259. DELLY PELC260. ROBERTO PEREIRA261. WELLINGTON ANTONIO DONINELLI PEREIRA262. RICHARD PERLMAN263. CHRISTOPHER PHILLIP264. ARIEL FELICE PHILLIPS265. MARCIA PINHEIRO266. DENISE S. POMPL267. POW268. SKIZIT POWER269. TOM PRACINOS270. BYRON PRIOR & FAMILY271. ANDREA PSORAS272. MARY R273. NORMAN R RABIN274. ELLEN RACIOPPI-DAY275. KELLY RASMUSSEN276. DEAN RAY277. KELLY RAY278. REFLECT279. CHARLES REHN JNR IV280. RHONDA281. TIM RIFAT282. ROBERT283. ROBERT – 2284. CARLOS RODRIGUES285. HELEN ROEDRIG286. R. S. ROGERS287. MR AND MRS GARRY ROMANIK288. PAUL ROSE289. VICTORIA ROSE290. PETER ROSENHOLM291. JUSTICE RUIZ292. D S293. PIERRE SAMSON294. MELISSA SANDERSON295. LUCIA SANTOS & FAMILY296. JILL SAWYER297. SARAH SCHAEFFER298. STEFAN A. SCHOELLMANN299. DELISA SCHOOLER300. DOROTHY SCHULTZ301. BEVERLY A. SCHWEITZER302. BOB SDEWTELL303. SHELLY304. RYAN SHIELDS305. BBOY SKATE306. SLATEBREAKERS307. DAVID SMITH308. STEPHEN SMITH309. MIRIAM SNYDER310. DR CARLOS SOSA M.D.311. GERAL SOSBEE312. CARL SPERR313. ARCHIE STAFFORD314. STEPHEN315. STEPHEN316. MARIE STEVENS317. PAT STEWART318. CHRIS STUDIO & GIRLFRIEND319. KRISSI STULL320. ANNE SUCHARSKI321. ANDRZEJ SUDA322. SUE323. LYNN SURGALLA324. SUSPICIOUS DEATHS OF WRITERS AND JOURNALISTS WHO INVESTIGATED MINDCONTROL CRIMES/ MUERTES SOSPECHOSAS DE PERIODISTAS SOBRE CONTROL MENTAL325. ROBERT SWEGAN326. DOROTHY SZCZEPKOWSKI327. B T328. ADAM TAMBLE329. GRIMS TAROEEL330. LOLITA TAYLOR331. TERESA TAYLOR332. TEKMASTER333. MICHAEL TERRY334. MARSHALL THOMAS335. BETH TIOXIN336. TONY337. CHRISTOPHER LAMONT TRICE338. JOSHUA TRITT339. LYN TROXEL340. ANNA TSENTSIPER341. TORRANCE TURNER342. SAMEER USHER343. URI AKA DOCTOR NO.344. DON VALENTINE345. CHAD VANDERGRIFF346. DR CASSANDRA VAN NOSTRAND347. THÉRÈSE VERSAILLES348. RENA VETTLESON349. JAMES M. VIERLING JR.350. BAY RIDGE VIETNAM351. J L VITT352. MARY VIVIAN, MARLENE VIVIAN AND FLORENCE VIVIAN353. VON KIDD354. PETER K.VOSOUGH355. JAMES WALBERT & FAMILY356. TIMOTHY WAITE357. ROBERT WALKER358. FELICIA WARD359. MARK WATERHOUSE360. STEW WEBB361. LUCIAN WEBER362. DR ALFRED WEBRE363. MICHAEL WEGRZYN364. CLARE WEHRLE365. DOMINIE WELCH366. JOHN WELLS367. TERRY WENTZELL368. ELEANOR WHITE369. TIMOTHY WHITE370. GLENDA WHITEMAN371. ANN WILLIAMS372. STEVE WILSON373. ROBERT WOOD374. BRIAN WRONGE375. KAIS YACOUB376. GEORGE ZACHYSTAL377. IDA ZAMANSKAYA378. ANANDA ZAREN379. CHRIS ZUCKEREUROPE1. SHOMAN D. ADEH2. GABRIELE ALTENDORF3. HERBERT ALTENDORF4. JÜRGEN ALTENDORF5. BRIGITTE ALTHOF6. BABAK AMIREBRAHIMI7. VIVIANE, BEN AND RACHAEL ANAMUAH8. ANATOLIJ9. RUDY ANDRIA10. ANN11. DENNIS ARNOLD & YASMIN JEREMY12. NAMAN ASGHAR & FAMILY13. AZA14. MOJMIR BABACEK15. WALTRAUB BABL16. STEPHEN BAKER17. REZA BAYAT18. JENNIFER BERKEMEIER19. DENIZ BESIM20. JEAN-PAUL BOLEA21. BRIAN22. STEVEN CALVEY & PETER W MARTIN23. ALFREDO NIETO CENTENO24. ALJOSA CERNE25. “CHICKEN”26. MICHAEL CHMELIK27. JØRGEN CHRISTIANSEN28. CARL CLARK29. JOHN CLIFTOZ30. ANDREW COLE31. JEAN-NOEL CORDOLIANI32. DAVID COULSON33. KARLHEINZ CROISSANT34. STAN CUMANS35. DANIELA36. DARRIM & FAMILY37. MARIA PAULA ONOFRE DAS NEVES38. PETRIT DEMO39. BEN DEMPSEY40. NANS DESMICHELS41. KATHERINE DE SOUZA42. R. DIECKMANN43. FEJERVARY DOMINIK44. OVIDIU DONCIU45. PAOLO DORIGO46. DR LES DOVE47. LINDA DREW48. CAROL DUKE49. MARTIN EMMEN50. ESTEBAN51. DEVON FOWLER52. KATHERINE FRIEDLI53. AB FRIS54. ASTRID FUCHS55. SIGRUN GEBHARDT56. PRICOPI GELU57. ANI GEWALT58. RUTH GILL59. RAY GOEBEL60. OXANA GRUNWALD & FAMILY61. GUMIND62. GYBFEFE63. SIMON HAYES64. JOHAN HELLER65. PETER HELWIG66. STEIN E HENRIKSEN67. REGINALD HODGES68. TON HOOGEBOOM AND GERARD HOOGEBOOM69. AREND TER HORST70. HUGGLES71. MERV HUGHES72. CLIFF HUYLEBROECK73. JOANNA IATRIDOU74. INA75. LINDA JANE INCE76. MICHAEL IRVING77. ITALY - OVER 60 VICTIMS78. JULIAN JACKSON79. DOSSIER JOSEPHINE80. DANIELA K81. MAURICE KELLETT82. DEREK KINMOND83. BRIGITTE KLAUS84. J.KLAWATSCH85. MATTHIAS KLEIN86. JAN KREWINKEL87. IRMGARD KRONSBEIN-BELLCHAMBERS & FAMILY88. PETER KUTZA89. AUDRIUS KVILIUNAS90. SERGE LABRÈZE91. GAGIU IULIAN LAURENTIU92. PERNES LAURENTIU93. HENRY LICHTERFELDT94. LINDA95. FALLON LIPSCOMB96. BARTLOMIEJ LISTWAN97. FILIPPO LOMBARDO98. TATJANA LOTZ99. WALDEMAR LOTZ100. FERNANDO SANTAMARIA LOZANO101. FRANCES ANN LUFF102. A M103. MARIUS M104. WALTER MADLIGER105. JARKKO MAKKONEN106. MARA107. LUKE MARSH108. RAMON MARTINEZ109. CHRISTINE MARX110. BRIGITTE MATTE111. MATTERWAVE112. BERND MEERKAMP113. CATHERINE MILLS & FAMILY114. DARIUS MOCKUS115. VICTOR MONCHAMP116. THIERRY MOUTON117. JEAN MULLAN118. C N119. SARUNAS NEKRASIUS120. MAUREEN NORMAN121. IMELDA O' CONNOR122. DEBBIE PARTRIDGE123. LIDIA POPOVA124. NADIE PRIEUR125. DRAGINJA NATASHA PUSICH126. CAROL RAE127. WILLIAM RAE128. RANDOLPH129. REDMANN130. RICK131. KAREN RODDY132. RONALD133. FABRIZIO ROVEDI134. KLAUS RUDOLF135. JACQUELINE SALII136. RUUT SALO137. PAUL SAUNDERSON138. PAOLA SBRONZERI139. ROBERTO SCARUFFI140. SWETLANA SCHUNIN AND FAMILY – DIMITRI, SERGEY, DMITRI141. ANGELINA SCHWEYEN142. SIMON143. SIRBILLGATESJNR144. RICHARD SLUITER145. CAROL SMITH146. JAVIER RUIZ SOBRINO147. MONIKA SOKAL148. WALDTRAUT SRERNITZKE149. KIM STIRLING & FAMILY150. MONIKA STOCES151. REGINA STOLL152. SUSPICIOUS DEATHS OF WRITERS AND JOURNALISTS WHO INVESTIGATED MINDCONTROL CRIMES/ MUERTES SOSPECHOSAS DE PERIODISTAS SOBRE CONTROL MENTAL153. ROBERT SWEGAN154. TI29187155. MO TAHANI156. FRANCIS TAILOKA157. NATALIE TEULON158. TARA TILLY (THOMAS RITA)159. HELMUT TONDL160. SAHAR TORKY161. INGRID TREMEL162. UK163. UN JEUNE INGENIEUR164. EMILIA MARIA VAZ-MARCH165. JEAN VERSTRAETEN166. JACQUES VUILLOD167. TRACIE WALKER168. WATERFALL169. RANDOLF WEINAND170. SABINA WOHLWEND171. MAIRE WOLF172. CHRISTINA WYATT173. ZENBEL174. OVER 60 VICTIMS FROM ITALYCHINA & ASIA-PACIFIC1. AN ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE WHOLE WORLD BY OVER 50 CHINESE VICTIMS2. JOHN AIDMANN3. ah2006-cwy 天涯无处寻4. ALEX5. ahzsp26126. BAIBING (aka 2010lf)7. PAUL BAIRD8. 白云 BAIYUN0249. MR SHIJIE CAO10. CHAH00111. SHINE CHANG12. QIJIA CHENG13. CHINA – 62 VICTIMS14. DANIEL COLGAN15. CONNIE16. STEVE CROFT17. RAJ D18. HAI DANG19. DAVIS20. MARGARET DOWN21. DRAGANOVIC22. DEBORAH DUPRE23. JOHN FINCH & FAMILY & NEIGHBOURS24. FRANKY25. JAMES YUE GEE26. JOSEPH GIBSON27. MIYOKO GOTO28. TAKAHIRO GOTO29. LISA H30. KYUNG-GUK HA31. JOHN HANDLEY32. HARUKA33. hongzx34. ZHANG HUIMIN35. imary66061036. 来自 jiaodian902的自动回复37. JUNG, IL SUN38. jinyi69100139. THOMAS KOH40. TERUYUKI KURAHASHI41. GEORGE KWONG42. laofa9943. LEE44. JUDITH LESUE45. LI GUAN-PING46. WEI LI47. lijing689848. lilylinxin49. MIKEY LIU50. XIN LIU51. LUCIA52. SUZY M53. MR WENLONG MA ((IVAN)54. MABEL55. BETH MACLEAN56. LIZ MCCLELLAN57. DAVID LUKE MENDHAM58. MOKUREN59. PHIL MOON60. OSHANA161. KHANH DAC PHAM62. MOREEN PHILLIPS63. Pp64. pys62465. XIN ZHONG QING66. HAROLD B QUIBAN67. RAYMOND68. ANDREW ROBINSON69. MISS RUQUAN-GUO70. GARY D SIMMONS71. XIN WANG SHEN鏉ヨ嚜鐨勮嚜鍔ㄥ洖澶72. SOLEILMAVIS73. ELIZABETH ANNE SUTHERTON74. 鐜嬬嚂 tclwyy75. 3crobot76. 3V3NG3LA77. TONY TU78. WORARAT TUMMALUCKSAMEE79. LIZA VELUZ80. WWW2006BAILIU81. MISS XIAN-SUN (RINOA)82. SHENGLIN YI83. YINGLI84. “KELLY” TANG ZHAO85. 523062953@qq.comINDIA, THE MIDDLE-EAST & AFRICA1. F. A.2. NADA ABBAS3. ANNE4. DEB CHAKRABORTY5. RAJ D6. AHMAD FANI7. ABDURAHMAN HUSSIEN MOHAMED ISLAAM8. DEEPTHI JOHN9. RAHUL S JOSHI10. SIMRAN SINGH JUNEJA11. SHAFIQ KHAN12. SHIJU KRISHNA13. SURESH S. KUMAR14. TERUYUKI KURAHASHI15. MAHESHKUMAR16. PATRICIA MILLER17. OM_NAMASHIVA18. OTILLIA19. PARIKSHIT PATHAK20. DR FEISAL SALIMRUSSIA, UKRAINE & BELARUS1. AGAFFONOV Pavel2. ALBERT (девятин сергей)3. ALEKSEYEV Igor Georgievich4. ALEVTINA Pawlowna Gudzenko5. BASHKOVSKIY Vladimir6. BELARUS – OVER 14 CASES7. BOLOTSKIY Sergey8. BORODIENKO Vladimir9. NATALIA BYCHKOVA10. DANILOV Victor Yegorovich11. DOMOJIROVA Tatyana Kondratyevna & Family12. DRUZHININA Irina Vladimirovna & Family13. EREMIN Andrey14. ERMAKOV Vladimir Petrovich15. EVGENIA FILIPPOVA16. FROLOV Sergey Timofejevich & Family17. GALANIN Vitaly Ivanovich18. JUNOSHEVA Valentine19. KANDYBIN Edward Nikolayevich20. KATSERIKOVA Galina Ivanovna & Family21. KOCHETOVA Natalia Ivanovna22. KONDRATOVA Svetlana Vasilyevna & Family23. KOPYLOVA Liliy24. KOSTROVA Liy25. KOZLOV Valentin Alekseyevich & Family26. LEVINA Anna Petrovna27. PAVLOVSKY Grigoriy Fedorovich28. PETUKHOV Vitaly29. PETUKHOVA Alla Yakovlevna & Family30. PRODIUS Gennady31. PROHANOV Jury32. PROHANOVA Margarita33. REDKINA Swetlana34. ROMANENKO Galina35. ROZANCHUK Margarita Ivanovna & Family36. RYBIN Pyotr Lukich , RYBINA Alexandra Filippovna & Family37. SAMSONOV Nick38. SEREBRYAKOVA Ljubov39. SOSHINA NÁdÅjidÁ40. DMITRY SUCHKOV41. TORIN Sergei42. TRETIAKOVA Tamara Vitalievna, son Mikhail & Family43. VLADIMIR44. VORONTSOV Vladimir Borisovich45. VORONTSOVA Swetlana46. ZYBINA Nadejida PyotrovnaWE ARE BEING COOPTED AND FORCED AND TRICKED INTO AN ORWELLIAN FUNCTIONALIST TOTALITARIANISM – EVERYWHERE ON EARTH! - as almost all public discourses including ‘scientific’, ‘academic’ and ‘arts and culture’, and as much as 80% of ‘international news’, ‘events’ and ‘history’, have been degraded into produced and managed dramas/atrocities (i.e. wars, disasters, civil strife etc), and criminally presented as infotainment, endogenous socio-political changes, propaganda, pseudo-sciences and/or specious, tendentious or folkloric productions and discourses.Regarding these NWO Crimes Against Humanity, War Crimes, Dirty Wars, Black Operations, Secret Weapons, Destruction of Democratic Institutions and Standards, Total Degradation of Media and Public Discourses, Total Degradation and Disenfranchisement of Civil Society and Institutions there is a complete ORWELLIAN/STALINIST PUBLIC INFORMATION AND INQUIRY BLACKOUT.It is our responsibility to record and alert the world to these horrendous crimes - and the extreme danger that these technologies, powers and tendencies pose to human rights, liberty, democracy, privacy and the mental and physical freedom, individuality, integrity, health and growth of all people – in all their “infinite?” richness, degrees, dimensions, aspects, qualities and diversity!Make no mistake these are the most horrendous totalitarian weapons and crimes imaginable and the people and organizations using them are mass-murdering conspirators pursuing totalitarian fundamentalist schemes.Beware of the brain and gene phrenologists/determinists/reductionists, and those who seek to control and reduce the range, quality and diversity of human thoughts, imaginations, senses, sensibilities, moods, attitudes, speech and psycho-physiologies – the would-be socio-economic, cultural AND PSYCHOLOGICAL/INTELLECTUAL/ PHYSIOLOGICAL monopolists, monoculturalists, police and prosecutors who are already literally and physically actively at work amongst us!! Both monstrously and criminally, and also far more insidiously.And beware of this dumbing-down, disenfranchisement, degradation and monoculturalisation caused by the paucity and total degradation of public information and discourse, and the subsequent and consequent “Fahrenheit 451-ing” of previously autonomous cultures, professions, fields of human endeavour, memories, and intelligences.BEWARE OF THE PSEUDO-SCIENCE NAZIS - THE ENEMIES OF FREE AND OPEN INFORMATION AND DEBATE, ACCOUNTABILITY, REVIEW AND REGULATION.NOT TO MENTION THE NUTCASES PURSUING SUCH FRANKENSTEIN-SCIENCES AS THE TRANSGENIC, AND THE “BLENDING” OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL AND BIOLOGICAL– EVEN AS RECORD BIODIVERSITY AND CULTURAL DIVERSITY DESTRUCTION IS DONE.PLEASE WITNESS AND RECORD AND OPPOSE ALL OF THE ABOVE CRIMES, AND ASSIST US URGENTLY!!
Read more…

Entry from my blog titled: The cold war

I'm making these observations today after the report of the man who killed people inside of a workout gym, and the fact that he kept a blog mentioning his feelings and his intent.There are a couple of different things going on the world and the minds of the media and the radio industry. First of all, they fear me, that I will strike out in person against them in some violent act, and so, they use examples like this blog to prove or back up their thinking, so they stay in this mode of watching me out fear. Secondly, they use false stereotyping as basis for their claims, such as, she's schizophrenic so naturally she's dangerous, and can at any moment fall into fits of madness, after losing so much in her life, naturally she will want to die, and they have been keeping track of everything I have said out loud, which hasn't been good. Thirdly, they want to keep thinking this way as a means of controlling me subconsciously, wanting me to just accept my targeting and be placid, even after years of torture and indirect comments and stranglehold from them, they always want, and think they deserve,the upper hand, and definitely, definitely never admit guilt.Fourth, they know that people like us, targets, have every reason to be angry and so, they can not let us have our freedom, because we may still act out from all of our pain and suffering, we may seek revenge somewhere down the road, even if we are free again.I thought I had a free space here to say what I want, but that is a joke, and the joke is on me, because I will never, ever be free living like this. I want to resume writing, and will, soon, but I may have to watch what I say.
Read more…
From Lt. Col Tom Beardon Ret- How to build a sensative Scalar Wave Detector!!!from STAR WARS NOW!The Bohm-Aharonov Effect, Scalar Interferometry, and Soviet Weaponizationby Lt. Col. T.E. Bearden (retd.), 1984CopyrightA Sensitive Scalar Wave DetectorVery briefly we present a method of making a very sensitive scalar wave detector so that direct measurement and quantization can be established.First, we regard one oscillation (one wavelength) of the scalar potential wave as a longitudinal photon. Note that this photon contains a substructure, which may be deliberately determined (when artificially made) or randomized (when naturally made in the idealized case).For convenience we represent normal linearized vacuum (spacetime) as a horizontal or longitudinal vector (Figure 4), implying the direction of motion of the wave in the laboratory frame. By horizontal position in our diagram, we imply a linear, uncurved spacetime and a non-rotated frame. We represent the longitudinal scalar wave as a horizontal vector, and the usual Hertzian wave as a vertical or "transverse" vector. We visualize a normal detector as detecting only a vertical or "transverse" vector, as we have illustrated in Figure 4.As can be seen, in a linear, unrotated or uncurved spacetime a pure scalar wave has no vertical component projected upon the laboratory frame vector, so it is not detectable by normal detectors.To detect the scalar wave, of course we could bend it so that it has a projected vertical component in the laboratory frame (Figure 5). However, this would be an impure wave, not a pure scalar wave, and that is not what we wish.A better way is to bend or curve spacetime itself in a small region, so that a longitudinal wave that passes through that region now possesses a vertical component with respect to that region (Figure 6). Thus a normal detector there will detect that vertical component. We conduct the detection current out of the "bent spacetime" region to an outside (normal) detector, and we then have a scalar wave detector.To illustrate, we show conceptually how this has been successfully done. Figure 7 shows the concept. First, we utilize a magnetic pole to provide the infolded energy (potential) to bend or curve spacetime. To reach good sensitivity, we need a pole strength connected with a magnetic field strength of 40,000 Gauss or higher. We utilize a small superconducting magnet, which can reach field strengths of from 40,000 to 80,000 Gauss.Slide 33 - FER DE LANCEThen to prevent detection of superfluous "normal" radiation, we shield the entire magnet in a grounded Faraday cage, as shown in the figure. Hertzian waves will be grounded in this shield, while scalar waves will readily penetrate it undiminished. In other words, the Faraday cage serves as a "stripper," to strip away the ordinary waves, leaving only the scalar waves to penetrate inside. An ordinary wire lies at the top of the magnetic pole, in proximity to it. The wire runs out of the Faraday cage through an insulated port to a resonant tuning circuit, which is sharply tunable over the range of frequencies we are interested in. A preamp amplifies the output of the tuner, and in turn feeds the input of an oscilloscope or other detector.With this detector we can select the frequency desired, and detect any passing scalar waves of that frequency. By other variations of amps and preamps, regenerative circuits, etc. we can obtain all the sensitivity desired, and utilize ordinary detection equipment already well-known and highly developed.Additional Information about detecting Scalar Waves
Read more…
Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, July/August 2004,pages 54-55

The Mideast in the Midwest

A Midwest Jewish Activist Helps Fight Zionist Mind Control in America

By Betsy Mayfield

mayfield_03.jpgvertrule.gif
Henry Herskovitz at the April 23 demonstration in front of the Peoria, IL corporateheadquarters of Caterpillar, Inc. to protest Israel’suse of its bulldozers to demolish Palestinian homes. In March2003 an IDF-driven Caterpillar crushed to death Americanpeace activist Rachel Corrie (staff photo B. Mayfield).

[PALESTINIANS] are not a rabble but a nation, perhaps somewhat tattered, but still living. A living people makes such enormousconcession on such fateful questions [as colonialization] whenthere is no hope left. Only when not a single breach is visiblein the iron wall, only then do extreme groups lose their swayand influence transfers to moderate groups. Only then would thesemoderate groups come to us with proposals for mutual concessionson such fateful questions like guarantees against expulsion,or equality and national autonomy.…the only path to such an agreementis the iron wall, that is to say the strengthening in Palestineof a government without any kind of Arab influence, that is tosay one against which the Arabs will fight. In other words, forus the only path to an agreement in the future is an absoluterefusal of any attempts at an agreement now.

—Vladimir Jabotinsky, 1923

Driving from Ann Arbor, Michigan, to Ames, Iowa, in mid-January is not a trip one embarks upon without good cause. But Henry Herskovitzbelieves his cause is good. He knows that in America’s Midwesta public relations war is being waged to secure unquestioning supportfor Israel. The Jewish Michigander wants to reach the hearts andminds of Midwesterners. He seeks not to control minds, but ratherurges people—especially those raised to value Zionism above allelse—to become aware and to think for themselves. Herskovitz wantsJews and non-Jews to think about Israeli occupation; the falsesuggestion that all Palestinians are antidemocratic radicals; andthe tactics used to silence those who dare speak out in recognitionof the political, economic and social imbalance that Israel hasover the Christian and Muslim Arabs.

An American Jewish objector to Israel’s colonial and violent occupation of Palestine, Herskovitz made the trek to Ames, Iowa,with filmmaker Thom Saffold, to see if any members of the AmesJewish community would talk to him about American Jewish supportof the Israel-First policy. He came in response to a request byorganizers (including the author) of “Palestine Unabridged,” athree-month film series held at the Ames Public Library from Sept.11 to Dec. 11, 2003. The series offered alternative views on theIsrael-Palestine conflict.

Here in Iowa, Revisionist Zionists—the ideological descendants of Vladimir Jabotinsky—are determined “to make someone pay” forthe film series’ success. Some 30 to 50 Jewish and Christian Zionistsstill are stunned that the familiar accusation of “anti-Semitic” failedto shut down the film series, nor did slander, isolation or dirtytricks against series organizers have the desired effect. Of apopulation of 50,000, this small group of Revisionist Zionist sympathizers,aided by the Jewish Federation of Greater Des Moines, tried toget two of our librarians fired, remove a leader of the Ames InterfaithCouncil, and dismiss a young Chicano activist who dared place a “PalestineUnabridged” poster in the window of his not-for-profit communityoffice. Explained one Zionist, “We cannot allow American institutionsto become a platform for anti-Israel thinking.”

But the Ames Public Library, the City of Ames and the organizations sponsoring “Palestine Unabridged” refused to be deterred by thefrequently employed tactic of interrupting and changing the subjectfrom Palestine to Israel. Initially, the Zionist opponents of freespeech and thought resorted to calling in a local fire marshalto turn on lights in the middle of the film “Rana’s Wedding” tosee if the library had allowed more people in the auditorium thanfire codes permit. The opening night ruse did not succeed, andthe show went on—for 11 more weeks. One hundred or more peopleattended each film and 30 to 60 participants discussed the issuesat a local coffee house on alternate weeks.

Have Cause, Will Travel

Henry Herskovitz has not always waved the flag for the Palestinian cause. An engineer focused on his successful career,Herskovitz spent little energy investigating what was going onin Palestine. Then, he retired. “I decided I had to go and seefirsthand what the conflict was all about,” he explained. “Of course,I had read about it over the years, but I really didn’t have agood grasp of the situation. I spent all my adult life using engineeringskillsto fix things, but I knew that I had to have experience to developreal insight into a mechanical problem and, certainly, into thisseemingly untenable human problem. Israel always seemed like agood idea to me, but I had questions.”

After a 2002 visit to Israel/Palestine, Herskovitz returned to Ann Arbor a changed man.His questions had been answered by firsthandexperience. Active in the Ann Arbor peacecommunity, Herskovitzassumed he would have no trouble telling his friends and fellowJewish community members about his trip and the disturbing realizationsstill reverberating in his head. He prepared a Power Point presentationabout the Israeli checkpoints, home demolitions, needless killingsand the attitude which he saw as destroying not only the Palestinians,but the Israelis, as well. Expectantly, Herskovitz called on thelocal rabbi to arrange a date for a showing. The answer was a shock. “No,” hewas told by Temple Beth Emeth (Reformed), Beth Israel Congregation(Conservative), Chabad House (Orthodox), and the Jewish CommunityCenter.

Herskovitz put himself on the line. He knocked on doors until all were slammed shut once and for all. Protest, he decided,was the only option. He formed a small group called Jewish Witnessesfor Peace and friends—with a small “f” for “friends” because hewants to make it clear that his concerns are Jewish issues. Heprinted up signs that read, “THIS IS NOT MY JUDAISM,” under a pictureof the Huwarra checkpoint; “STOP U.S. AID TO ISRAEL”; and “ANNARBOR JEWS SAY ‘END THE ISRAELI OCCUPATION.’”

On Sept. 13, 2003, as we in Ames were just beginning our film series, Herskovitz and a dozen others began weekly peaceful vigilsoutside Ann Arbor synagogues on Saturdays. They could not failto be seen by those coming and going to prayers and study.

After more than six months of weekly protest, Herskovitz says the best he can get from his “old” friends are comments such as,“Idon’t want to have a discussion with you, but I want to tell youjust one thing...”

Explains Herskovitz, “This one-way ‘conversation’ expressed how unhappy our vigils made [the woman]. As she walked away, we explainedthat it is not our intent to make anyone unhappy. However, herquestion begs inspection. If she had hung around, we would haveasked: ‘What is contained in our message that you find painful?And why is that message painful to you?’”

When Herskovitz came to Ames this past January 2004, only one Jewish friend of the author’s, a moderate Zionist, would speakwith him. Herskovitz gave him his card and said, “If you can get10 Jewish or Zionist folks from Ames to talk to me, I’ll driveback anytime.” That has yet to happen.

We Dared to Speak Out

Having produced a successful film series despite continuing efforts to silence us, Ames festival organizers are still payinga price for our determination. Economic threats, social isolationand hate-based rhetoric continue as our Zionist opposition is determinedto let the rest of the community know the turmoil they will createfor anyone who speaks out against the Israeli occupation. RevisionistZionists continue to insist on an official, public apology.

One series objector who now works for our local paper never fails to flaunt her disdain for “Palestine Unabridged” when she visitsthe Ames Public Library and talks to library staff. As she andothers told us on the last night of our program, “What you didwas a mistake.”

Other partisans of Israel have spent the last four months harassing the library board, demanding a public apology and “unofficial” censorshipthrough policy changes designed to deny the public access to programscritical of Israel. As Joel Beinin wrote in “Thought Control forMiddle East Studies,” his March 31 Common Dreams critiqueof the Zionist tweaking of Title VI of the U.S. Higher EducationAct, the idea is “to study, monitor, apprise, and evaluate” suspectprograms at American universities. According to Beinin, Washingtonneocons want “to assert political control over teaching, research,and public programs” so that Americans will remain oblivious toanything unfavorable to Israel or America’s support of Israelipolicy.

In Ames, Iowa, we are discovering that this kind of mind control is occurring outside the academy, as well.

Henry Herskovitz in Ann Arbor and our small group here in Ames have put ourselves on the line in an effort to make people awareofthe evils of colonization in Palestine and the use of the “anti-Semite” labelto stifle debate. As of mid-April, Herskovitz reported, the executivedirector of the Jewish Federation of Washtenaw County solicitedletters from socially prominent Ann Arbor community members. Thirteenpeople have responded, writing anti-Herskovitz letters to the localAnn Arbor news. Letters in support of “vigillers” are increasing,however.

Henry Herskovitz knows that peace starts with just one voice, and he is as encouraged as we are. Jewish Witnesses for Peace andfriends, the “Palestine Unabridged” series, and the actions ofInformation Age groups everywhere are signs of a growing grassrootsmomentum. The work for peace has just begun.

Betsy Mayfield is a writer and activist based in Ames, Iowa.

SIDEBAR

Henry Herskovitz In His Own Words

Jewish Americans Can Help End Conflict (letter to the Feb. 25, 2004 Ann Arbor News):

Our group, formed last year, is called “Jewish Witnesses for Peace and friends.” We hold silent vigils in front ofBeth Israel Congregation primarily to raise awareness ofthe effects of Israel’s 36-year-old illegal occupation ofPalestinian land. Our venue is the synagogue, because theaudience we wish to address is mainstream American Jews,very much like ourselves.

Many of the Jewish people who attend synagogue are those who financially and politically support Israel. Our goalis to end this funding of Israel’s occupation, financed byindividual contributions, and by our tax dollars and loanguarantees. Ending the occupation is the most logical andnecessary way to bring a just and lasting peace to the region.The estimated amount of money donated through these sourcestotals $15 million every day (Source: Washington Reporton Middle East Affairs).

Our vigil accomplishes much more, however. To non-Jews, who might be critical of Israeli policies but too concernedto speak lest they be labeled “anti-Semites,” we offer themthe observance that Jewish Americans come forth and criticizethe Israeli government.

The Jewish community can play a vital and significant role in reducing the continuing slaughter of innocents in Israeland Palestine, both Jewish and Palestinian. Many in our grouphave been to Palestine and have witnessed firsthand the horrorsof occupation.

Henry Herskovitz, Ann Arbor

On AIPAC’s Chicago Conference, “The Israel Summit—Tools for Action”

Perhaps most shocking to this observer was the nationalist tone set by this conference. A large room with hundreds ofdining tables housed 1,600 attendees (650 students). At thefront, on stage, stood the speakers’ table flooded in brightlight. Flanking the speakers were four national flags: twoIsraeli (large and small) on the speaker’s left, and like-sizedUnited States flags, on his/her right.

The show of power of this lobby was not limited just to physical surroundings. Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin and nineIllinois congressional representatives each spoke about theircommitment to Israel, and to the goal of AIPAC—“Stengtheningthe U.S.-Israel relationship.” Jesse Jackson, Jr. spoke ofhis AIPAC-sponsored trip to Israel, and thanked the organizationalong with local rabbis (esp. Rabbi David Saperstein) forthe privilege of traveling there. He declared “most moving” washis trip to Yad Vashem, Jerusalem’s Holocaust Memorial, andsubsequent “need” for the Jewish State. Congresswoman JanSchakowsky explained how helpful AIPAC is to citizens runningfor Congress: they will help the politician-to-be draft his/herIsrael solidarity statement.

And wealth: Many of the 650 students in attendance were flown in at the expense of just three local businessmen.The ability to raise funds for Israel is just one of AIPAC’smany strengths. As peace activists dedicated to Palestinianself-determination, we have our work cut out for ourselves.


Home > Archives > July_Aug_2004 > A Midwest Jewish Activist Helps Fi
Read more…

NSA SIGNALS INTELLIGENCE USE OF EMF BRAIN STIMULATION

scalartech12_top1.gif

by John St Clair Akwei
From an article in NexusMagazine April/May 96

fromMindControlForums Website

A lawsuitfiled against the U.S. National Security Agency revealsa frightening array of technologies and programsdesigned to keep tabs on individuals.
.

John StClair Akwei
vs
National Security Agency
Ft George G. Meade, MD, USA
(Civil Action 92-0449)
.

Thefollowing document comprises evidence for a lawsuitfiled at the U.S. Courthouse in Washington, DC, by JohnSt Clair Akwei against the National Security Agency, FtGeorge G. Meade, Maryland (Civil Action 92-0449),constitutes his knowledge of the NSA's structure,national security activities proprietary technologiesand covert operations to monitor individual citizens Ed.



1. THE NSA'SMISSION AND DOMESTIC INTELLIGENCE OPERATION

  • Communications Intelligence (COMINT)
    Blanket coverage of all electronic communications in the US andthe world to ensure national security. The NSA at Ft Meade,Maryland has had the most advanced computers in the world sincethe early 1960s. NSA technology is developed and implemented insecret from private corporations, academia and the generalpublic.


  • Signals Intelligence (SICINT)
    The Signals Intelligence mission of the NSA has evolved into aprogram of decoding EMF waves in the environment for wirelesslytapping into computers and track persons with the electricalcurrents in their bodies. Signals Intelligence is based on factthat everything in the environment with an electric current init has a magnetic flux around it which gives off EMF waves. TheNSA/DoD [Department of Defense] developed proprietary advanceddigital equipment which can remotely analyze all objects whethermanmade or organic, that have electrical activity.


  • Domestic Intelligence (DOMINT)
    The NSA has records on all US citizens. The NSA gathersinformation on US citizen who might be of interest to any of theover 50,000 NSA agents (HUMINT). These agents are authorized byexecutive order to spy on anyone. The NSA has a permanentnational security anti-terrorist surveillance network in place.This surveillance network is completely disguised and hiddenfrom the public.


    Tracking individuals in the US is easily and cost-effectivelyimplemented with NSA's electronic surveillance network. Thisnetwork (DOMINT) covers the entire US, involves tens ofthousands of NSA personnel, and tracks millions of personssimultaneously . Cost-effective implementation of operations isassured by NSA computer technology designed to minimizeoperations costs. NSA personnel serve in quasi-public positionsin their communities and run cover businesses and legitimatebusinesses that can inform the intelligence community of personsthey would want to track. NSA personnel in the community usuallyhave cover identities such as social workers, lawyers andbusiness owners.


  • Individual Citizens OccasionallyTargeted for Surveillance by Independently Operating NSAPersonnel
    NSA personnel can control the lives of hundreds of thousands ofindividuals in the US by using the NSA's domestic intelligencenetwork and cover businesses. The operations independently runby them can sometimes go beyond the bounds of law. Long-termcontrol and sabotage of tens of thousands of unwitting citizensby NSA operatives is likely to happen.

    NSA DOMINT has theability to assassinate US citizens covertly or run covertpsychological control operations to cause subjects to bediagnosed with ill mental health.

scalartech12_01.gif

The above symptomshighlight a fraction of the vast array of
Neuro-Electromagnetic Frequency Assaults perpetuated by the Policeand
Military Intelligence Agencies toward
Remote Mind Control Experiments, Behavioral Manipulation andMurder.

2. NSA'SDOMESTIC ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE NETWORK

As of the early 1960s, the most advanced computers in the world wereat the NSA, Ft Meade. Research breakthroughs with these computerswere kept for the NSA. At the present time the NSA hasnanotechnology computers that are 15 years ahead of present computertechnology. The NSA obtains blanket coverage of information in theUS by using advanced computers that use artificial intelligence toscreen all communications, regardless of medium, for key words thatshould be brought to the attention of NSA agents/cryptologists.

These computers monitor allcommunications at the transmitting and receiving ends. This blanketcoverage of the US is a result of the NSA's Signals Intelligence (SIGINT)mission. The NSA's electronic surveillance network is based on acellular arrangement of devices that can monitor the entire EMF(electromagnetic frequency)spectrum.

This equipment was developed, implemented and kept secretin the same manner as other electronic warfare programs.

  • Signals Intelligence RemoteComputer Tampering
    The NSA keeps track of all PCs and other computers sold in theUS. This is an integral part of the Domestic Intelligencenetwork. The NSA's EMF equipment can tune in RF (remotefrequency) emissions frompersonal computer circuit boards (while filtering out emissionsfrom monitors and power sup- plies).

    The RF emission from PCcircuit boards contains digital information in the PC. Coded RFwaves from the NSA's equipment can resonate PC circuits andchange data in the PCs. Thus the NSA can gain wirelessmodem-style entry into any computer in the country forsurveillance or anti-terrorist electronic warfare.


  • Detecting EMF Fields in Humansfor Surveillance
    A subject's bioelectric field can be remotely detected, sosubjects can be monitored anywhere they are. With special EMFequipment NSA cryptologists can remotely read evoked potentials(from EEGs). These can be decoded into a person's brain-statesand thoughts. The subject is then perfectly monitored from adistance. NSA personnel can dial up any individual in thecountry on the Signals Intelligence EMF scanning network and theNSA's computers will then pinpoint and track that person 24hours a day.

    The NSA can pick out and track anyone in the US.

scalartech12_02.gif

3. NSA SIGNALSINTELLIGENCE USE OF EMF BRAIN STIMULATION

NSA Signals Intelligence uses EMF Brain Stimulation forRemoteNeural Monitoring (RNM) and Electronic Brain Link (EBL). EMF BrainStimulation has been in development since theMKULTRA program of theearly 1950s, which included neurological research into radiation(non-ionizing EMF) and bioelectric research and development.

Theresulting secret technology is categorized at the National SecurityArchives as "Radiation Intelligence", defined as,

"information from unintentionallyemanated electromagnetic waves in the environment, not includingradioactivity or nuclear detonation".

Signals Intelligence implemented andkept this technology secret in the same manner as other electronicwarfare programs of the US Government. The NSA monitors availableinformation about this technology and withholds scientific researchfrom the public. There are also international intelligenceagreements to keep this technology secret.

The NSA has proprietary electronic equipment that analyze electricalactivity in humans from a distance. NSA computer generated brainmapping can continuously monitor all of the electrical activity inthe brain continuously. The NSA records and decode individual brainmaps (of hundreds of thousands of persons) for national securitypurposes. EMF Brain Stimulation is also secretly used by themilitary for brain-to-computer link (in military fighter aircraft,for example).

For electronic surveillance purposes, electrical activity in thespeech center of the brain can be translated into the subject'sverbal thoughts. RNM can send encoded signals to the brain'sauditory cortex, thus allowing audio communications direct to thebrain (bypassing the ears). NSA operatives can use this covertly todebilitate subjects by simulating auditory hallucinationscharacteristic of paranoid schizophrenia.

Without any contact with the subject, Remote Neural Monitoring canmap out electrical activity from the visual cortex of a subject'sbrain and show images from the subject's brain on a video monitor.NSA operatives see what the surveillance subject's eyes are seeing.Visual memory can also be seen. RNM can send images direct to thevisual cortex, bypassing the eyes and optic nerves.

NSA operativescan use this surreptitiously to put images into a surveillancesubject's brain while they are in REM sleep for brain-programmingpurposes.

  • Capabilities of NSA OperativesUsing RNM
    There has been a Signals Intelligence network in the US sincethe 1940s. The NSA, Ft Meade has in place a vast two-waywireless RNM system which is used to track subjects andnon-invasively monitor audio-visual information in their brains.This is all done with no physical contact with the subject. RNMis the ultimate method of surveillance and domesticintelligence. Speech, 3D sound and subliminal audio can be sentto the auditory cortex of the subject's brain (bypassing theears), and images can be sent into the visual cortex. RNM canalter a subject's perceptions, moods and motor control.

    Speech cortex/auditory cortex link has become the ultimatecommunications system for the intelligence community. RNM allowsfor a complete audio-visual brain-to-brain link or brain-to-computer link.

scalartech12_03.gif

The above is a simpleflowchart of Nuero-Electromagnetic Frequency Assaults

showing methods thatcan be perpetuated by the Police and Military Intelligence Agencies

toward Remote MindControl Experiments, Behavioural Manipulation and Murder.

4. NATIONALSECURITY AGENCY SIGNALS INTELLIGENCE ELECTRONIC BRAIN LINKTECHNOLOGY

NSA SIGINT can remotely detect, identifyand monitor a person's bioelectric fields.

The NSA's Signals Intelligence has the proprietary ability tomonitor remotely and non-invasively information in the human brainby digitally decoding the evoked potentials in the 30-50 Hz, 5 milliwatt electromagnetic emissions from the brain.

Neuronal activity in the brain creates a shifting electrical patternthat has a shifting magnetic flux. This magnetic flux puts out aconstant 30-50 Hz, 5 milliwatt electromagnetic (EMF) wave. Containedin the electromagnetic emission from the brain are spikes andpatterns called "evoked potentials". Every thought, reaction, motorcommand, auditory event and visual image in the brain has acorresponding "evoked potential" or set of "evoked potentials". TheEMF emission from the brain can be decoded into the currentthoughts, images and sounds in the subject's brain.

NSA SIGINT uses EMF-transmitted Brain Stimulation as acommunications system to transmit information (as well as nervoussystem messages) to intelligence agents and also to transmit to thebrains of covert operations subjects (on a non-perceptible level).

EMF Brain Stimulation works by sending a complexly coded and pulsedelectromagnetic signal to trigger evoked potentials (events) in thebrain, thereby forming sound and visual images in the brain's neuralcircuits. EMF Brain Stimulation can also change a person'sbrain-states and affect motor control.

Two-way electronic Brain Link is done by remotely monitoring neuralaudio-visual information while transmitting sound to the auditorycortex (bypassing the ears) and transmitting faint images to thevisual cortex (bypassing the optic nerves and eyes). The imagesappear as floating 2D screens in the brain.

Two-way electronic Brain Link has become the ultimate communicationssystem for CIA/NSA personnel. Remote neural monitoring (RNM,remotely monitoring bioelectric information in the human brain) hasbecome the ultimate surveillance system.

It is used by a limitednumber of agents in the US Intelligence Community.

scalartech12_04.gif

The above is a simpleflowchart of Nuero-Electromagnetic Frequency Assaults

showing methods thatcan be perpetuated by the Police and Military Intelligence Agenciestoward
Remote Mind Control Experiments, Behavioural Manipulation andMurder.

5. [NO HEADINGIN ORIGINAL DOCUMENT]

RNM requires decoding the resonance frequency of each specific brainarea. That frequency is then modulated in order to imposeinformation in that specific brain area. The frequency to which thevarious brain areas respond varies from 3 Hz to 50 Hz. Only NSASignals Intelligence modulates signals in this frequency band. (SeeTable 1 below)

This modulated information can be putinto the brain at varying intensities from subliminal toperceptible. Each person's brain has a unique set of bioelectricresonance/entrainment frequencies. Sending audio information to aperson's brain at the frequency of another person's auditory cortexwould result in that audio information not being perceived.

The Plaintiff learned of RNM by being in two-way RNM contact withthe Kinnecome group at the NSA, Ft Meade.

They used RNM 3D sound direct to the brain to harass the Plaintifffrom October 1990 to May 1991.

As of 5/91 they have had two-way RNM communications with thePlaintiff and have used RNM to attempt to incapacitate the Plaintiffand hinder the Plaintiff from going to the authorities about theiractivities against the Plaintiff in the last 12 years. The Kinnecomegroup has about 100 persons working 24 hours a day at Ft Meade. Theyhave also brain-tapped persons the Plaintiff is in contact with tokeep the Plaintiff isolated.

This is the first time ever that aprivate citizen has been harassed with RNM and has been able tobring a lawsuit against NSA personnel misusing this intelligenceoperations method.

scalartech12_05.gif

click above image

6. NSATECHNIQUES AND RESOURCES

Remote monitoring/tracking of individuals in any location, insideany building, continuously, anywhere in the country.

A system forinexpensive implementation of these operations allows for thousandsof persons in every community to be spied on constantly by the NSA.

  • Remote RNM Devices
    NSA's RNM equipment remotely reads the evoked potentials (EEGs)of the human brain for tracking individuals, and can sendmessages through the nervous systems to affect theirperformance. RNM can electronically identify individuals andtrack them anywhere in the US. This equipment is on a networkand is used for domestic intelligence operations, governmentsecurity and military base security, and in case of bioelectricwarfare.


  • Spotters and Walk-Bys inMetropolitan Areas
    Tens of thousands of persons in each area working as spottersand neighbourhood/business place spies (sometimes unwittingly)following and checking on subjects who have been identified for covert control by NSA personnel.

    Agents working out of offices can be in constant communicationwith spotters who are keeping track of the NSA's thousands ofsubjects in public. NSA agents in remote offices can instantlyidentify (using~ RNM) any individual spotted in public who is incontact with surveillance subject.


  • Chemicals and Drugs intoResidential Buildings with Hidden NSA Installed and MaintainedPlastic Plumbing lines.
    The NSA has kits for running lines into residential tap waterand air ducts of subjects for the delivery of drugs (such assleeping gas or brainwashing-aiding drugs). This is an outgrowthof CIA pharmapsychology (psychopharmacology).


  • Brief Overview of Proprietary USIntelligence/Anti-Terrorist Equipment Mentioned
    Fixed network of special EMF equipment that can read EEGs inhuman brains and identify/track individuals by using digitalcomputers. ESB (Electrical Stimulation to the Brain) via EMFsignal from the NSA Signals Intelligence is used to controlsubjects.

    EMF equipment that gathers information from PC circuit boards bydeciphering RF emissions, thereby gaining wireless modem-styleentry into any personal computer in the country. All equipmenthidden, all technology secret, all scientific researchunreported (as in electronic warfare research). Not known to thepublic at all, yet complete and thorough implementation of thismethod of domestic intelligence has been in place since theearly 1980s.

Editor's Note:

I tried ringing MrAkwei to find out what was the out-come, if any, of his court case.He firmly but kindly told me that he could not speak about anythingto do with the case over the phone and hung up. A subsequentconversation of similar length resulted in the information that hedid not wish his address or phone number published with thisarticle.

So, if we hear of any developments, we'll let you know.

Its totallyobvious from the above article that the US NationalSecurity Agency is none other than a covertly runterrorist organization.

Their highly sophisticated technology that is used tomonitor and manipulate the minds of millions of innocentpeople daily, is a blatant expression of the dominatingand authoritarian mentality that exists behind thefacade of our so called democratic society.

George Orwell's "THOUGHT POLICE" is an absolutereality in today's world.

Whether we realize it or not, every individual withinour society is negatively effected by this dictatorshipattitude.

It has to change - It will change - It starts with you!

George Farquhar
Project Freedom


An example of EMF Brain Stimulation

Table 1

Brain Area
BioelectricResonance Frequency
Information Induced Through Modulation
Motor Control Cortex
10 Hz
Motor Impulse co-ordination
Auditory Cortex
15 Hz
Sound which bypasses the ears
Visual Cortex
25 Hz
Images in the brain bypassing the eyes
Somatosensory
9 Hz
Phantom touch sense
Thought Center
20 Hz
Imposed subconscious thoughts

RESOURCES

These publications have only been discovered sinceDecember 1991, after Plaintiff had already notifiedauthorities (Dept of Justice, etc.) of Public Corruption by named NSA employees.

When no action was taken against the NSAemployees, I researched the Intelligence Community electronicsurveillance technology involved and discovered the followingpublications.

  • The Body Electric: Electromagnetismand the Foundation of Life, by Robert Becker, M.D. Monitoringneuroelectric information in the brain ESB. (p. 265,313,318)

  • Cross currents, by Robert Becker.Simulating auditory hallucinations. Remote computer tamperingusing RF emissions from the logic board. (p.70,78,105,174,210,216,220,242,299,303)

  • Currents of Death, by Paul Brodeur.Driving brain electrical activity with external EM;magnetophosphenes; Delgado. (p. 27,93)

  • The Zapping of America, by PaulBrodeur. DoD EM ESB research; simulating auditoryhallucinations.

  • Of Mice, Men and Molecules, by JohnH. Heller 1963 Bioelectricity; probing the brain with EM waves.(p, 110)

  • The Three-Pound Universe, by JudithHooper. CIA EEG research; EEGs for surveillance. (p.29,132,137)

  • In the Palaces of Memory, by GeorgeJohnson. EM emissions from the brain; the brain as an openelectromagnetic circuit.

  • The Puzzle Palace, by James Bamford.Signals Intelligence; most advanced computers in the early'sixties.

  • The US Intelligence Community.Glossary terms at National Security Archives; RadiationIntelligence (information from unintentionally emanatedelectromagnetic energy, excluding radioactive sources).

  • The Search for the "Manchurian Candidate",by John Marks. Electrical or radio stimulation to the brain; CIAR&D in bioelectrics. (p.227)

  • Secret Agenda, by Jim Hougan.National security cult groups.

  • Crimes of the IntelligenceCommunity, by Morton Halperin. Surreptitious entries;intelligence agents running operations against governmentworkers.

  • War in the Age of IntelligentMachines, NSA computer supremacy, complete control ofinformation.

  • Alternate Computers, by Time-LifeBooks. Molecule computers.

  • The Mind, by Richard Restak, M.D.EEG Systems inc.; decoding brain EM emanations, trackingthoughts on a computer. (p. 258)

  • MedTech, by Lawrence Galton.Triggering events in the brain, direct to auditory cortexsignals.

  • Cyborg, by D.S. Halacy, Jr, 1965.Brain-to-computer link research contracts given out by the USgovernment.

  • Psychiatry and the CIA: Victims ofMind Control, by Harvey M. Weinstein M.D. Dr. Cameron; psychicdriving; ultraconceptual communications.

  • Journey Into Madness: The True Storyof Secret CIA Mind Control and Medical Abuse, by Gordon Thomas,Intelligence R&D; Delgado; psychic driving with radio telemetry.(p. 127,276,116,168,169)

  • Mind Manipulators, by Alan Scheflinand Edward M. Opton. MKULTRA brain research forinformation-gathering.

  • The Brain Changers, by Maya Pines.Listening to brain EM emissions. (p.19)

  • Modern Bioelectricity. Inducingaudio in the brain with EM waves; DoD cover-up; EM wave ESB;remote EEGs

  • Magnetic Stimulation in ClinicalNeurophysiology, by Sudhansu Chokroverty. Magnetophosphenes;images direct to the visual cortex.

  • The Mind of Man, by Nigel Calder. USintelligence brain research.

  • Neuroelectric Society Conference,1971. Audio direct to the brain with EM waves; 2-way remoteEEGs.

  • Brain Control, by Elliot S.Valenstein. ESB., control of individuals.

  • Towards Century 21, by C.S. Wallia.Brain Stimulation for direct-to-brain communications (p21)

  • Mind Wars, by Ron McRae (associateof Jack Anderson). Research into brain-to-brain electroniccommunications., remote neural EM detection (PP. 62 106, 136).

  • Mind Tools, by Rudy Rucker. Braintapping; communications with varying biomagnetic fields (p82).

  • US News and World report, January2nd 1984. EM wave brain stimulation; intelligence communityhi-tech (p38).

  • Ear Magazine. Article on extremelylow frequencies radio emissions in the natural environment;radio emissions from the human body.

  • City Paper, Washington DC January17, 1992. Article FCC and NSA "complete radio spectrum"listening posts.

  • Frontiers in Science, by EdwardHutchings Jr 1958 (p48).

  • Beyond Bio Feedback, by Elmer andAlyce Green, 1977 (p118)

  • The Body Quantum, by Fred Alan Wolf

  • Cloning; A Biologist Reports, byRobert Gillmore McKinnell. Ethical review of cloning humans.

  • Hoovers' FBI, by Former agentWilliam Turner. Routines of electronic surveillance work.(p280).

  • July 20th 2019, by Arthur C. ClarkeLIDA; Neurophonics; Brain-computer link.

  • MegaBrain, by Michael Hutchison.Brain stimulation with EM waves; CIA research and informationcontrol. (pp.107,108,117,120,123).

  • The Cult of Information, by TheodoreRosnak, 1986. NSA Directive #145; personal files in computers;computer automated telephone tapping.

  • The Body Shop, 1986 implantation ofan electrode array on the visual cortex for video direct to thebrain; other 1960's research into electronically triggeringPhosphenes in the brain, thus bypassing the eyes.

  • Evoked Potentials, by David Regan.Decoding neuroelectric information in the brain.

Read more…
Swiss Air Flight 111 en route to the United Nations in Geneva Switzerland was Directed Energy destroyed- 10 Bioweapons experts from the USA were on board and the lead AIDS Researcher- all died that day in 1998http://mcvictimsworld.ning.com/forum/topics/swiss-air-flight-111-wasThere were 11 Top US Bioweapons experts on Swiss Air Flight 111. Evidence shows it was directed Energy Destroyed- killing over 200 innocent people. This plane was en route to the United Nations in Geneva Switzerland that day in 1998. Swiss Air Flight 111 was destroyed over Peggy's Cove Nova Scotia Canada. George H Bush was the secret government under the Clinton Administration that planned this along with Karl Rove, Cheney, Wolfowitz, William J Rigby, and James BakerSwissAirFlight111DestroyedByDirectedEnergyCarried_elevenTopScientists-0001.pdf, 2.5 MB
Read more…
http://www.wdcs.org/view_e_protest.php?e_protest_select=26&&select=415 TAKE ACTION ON We are calling on the United States and the member nations of the European Union to oppose Denmark's proposal on behalf of Greenland, to kill 10 humpback whales a year, under the banner of aboriginal subsistence whaling (AWS).http://org2.democracyinaction.org/o/5379/t/6856/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=1921 TAKE ACTION ON Give Your Senators Something to Think Abouthttp://capwiz.com/fconl/issues/alert/?alertid=13809541 TAKE ACTION ONhttp://www.commoncause.org/siteapps/advocacy/ActionItem.aspx?c=dkLNK1MQIwG&b=5346841&auid=5131134 TAKE ACTION ON CoSponsor the Fair Elections Now Act!http://capwiz.com/fconl/issues/alert/?alertid=13809541 TAKE ACTION ONhttps://secure.aclu.org/site/Advocacy?pagename=homepage&id=811&page=UserAction&JServSessionIdr011=uk9o6v71v1.app26a take action on It's Not Fair. It's Not Working.http://www.commoncause.org/siteapps/advocacy/ActionItem.aspx?c=dkLNK1MQIwG&b=5346841&auid=5131134 TAKE ACTION ONhttp://action.firedoglake.com/page/s/publicoption TAKE ACTION ON Call Congress: Take the Pledge for the Public Optionhttp://stopthedrugwar.org/changingminds09/donate TAKE ACTION ON With a reform-minded administration, an economic crisis and more people joining the reform movement, there's never been a better time to change policy than right now.http://americasvoiceonline.org/page/content/enough/ TAKE ACTION ON Enough is Enough! Sign the Petition to DHS Today!http://action.foodandwaterwatch.org/t/5915/petition.jsp?petition_KEY=2050 TAKE ACTION ON Sign the Petition to Stop New Factory Farms!http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/dhondupwangchen_qinghai/8ixnwid2zj7x5kk5? TAKE ACTION ON Help Keep the Pressure On to Free Dhondup Wangchen!http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/dhondupwangchen_qinghai/i57sex8r4j7x5kk5? TAKE ACTION ON Help Keep the Pressure On to Free Dhondup Wangchen!https://secure.avaaz.org/en/climate_action_factories/?cl=285638377&v=3716 TAKE ACTION ON SUPPORT YOUTH CLIMATE ADVOCATEShttp://www.dccc.org/page/s/healthcarecall?source=073009_cvh TAKE ACTION ON Join Rep. Chris Van Hollen for the DCCC Health Care Tele-Town Hallhttp://action.nwlc.org/site/Survey?SURVEY_ID=7540&ACTION_REQUIRED=URI_ACTION_USER_REQUESTS TAKE ACTION ON
Read more…
Subject: Effects of GHz radiation on the human nervous system: To be used as evidence in International criminal court justices -Paper presented by Harlan E. Girard, NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Coherent and Emergent Phenomena in Biomolecular Systems, The University of Arizona, January 15-1991AbstractThe United States has developed communications equipment which can make the blind see, the deaf hear and the lame walk. It can relieve the terminally ill of all pain, without the use of any drugs. A man might retain the use of all his faculties up until the day of his death.This communications equipment depends on a new way of looking at the human brain and neuromuscular system, and gigahertz radiation pulsed at ultra-low frequencies.Some of this equipment is now operational within the Central Intelligence Agency and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. It will never be used to make the blind see and the deaf hear and the lame walk because its use is central to the domestic political agenda and foreign policy of James A. Baker and George Herbert Walker Bush.Domestically, the new communications equipment is being used to torture and murder persons who match profiles imagined to be able to screen a given population for terrorists, to torture and murder citizens who belong to organizations which promote peace and development in Central America, to torture and murder citizens who belong to organizations opposed to the deployment and use of nuclear weapons, and to create a race of slaves called Automatons or what is popularly called the Manchurian Candidate.Overseas, experimentation is taking place on hostages held by the United States in Canada, Great Britain, Australia, Germany, Finland and France. In addition, there has been a long series of bizarre suicides among British computer scientists, all of whom had some connection to the United States Navy.Considenng how recklessly, wantonly and indiscriminately America's new weapons have been used, physicians attending the dead and dying should consider the patients known political views and associations before making a diagnosis or conducting an autopsy.INTRODUCTIONIn 1988 the Office of Technology Assessment of the Congress of the United States published a special report titled. Criminal Justice: New Technologies and the Constitution. The report surveys the new technologies used in the investigation, apprehension, and confinement of criminals and addresses that delicate balance to be maintained between the national interest and individual rights.As welcome as this report is to those of us who are interested in a government of law rather than of men, it manages to omit any discussion of the use of directed energy weapons from the section on less than lethal weapons. For instance, a weapon has been developed to paralyze a person at a distance, through a brick wall, if necessary. This weapon was developed during 1983-4 for use in situations where hostages are being held. A variation of this weapon has been purchased by the Marine Corps, for confusing and disorienting the enemy.American weapons research has centered on pulsed radiation in the gigahertz frequency band for a very interesting reason. In 1972, the Department of the Army researched Soviet and other foreign literature sources and discovered over 500 studies devoted to the biological effects of SHF - super-high frequency electromagnetic oscillations. (1)SHF may have potential use as a technique for altering human behavior. ...Lethal and non-lethal aspects have been shown to exist. In certain non-lethal exposures, definite behavioral changes have occurred. There also appears to be a change in mammals, when exposed to SHF, in sensitivity to sound, light, and olfactory stimuli.The significance of this intelligence document in terms of the medical experiments commissioned by the Central Intelligence Agency since 1976 is that emphasis in this report is placed on influencing individuals as opposed to groups.Secondly, this report is a trend study and therefore contains statements predicting Soviet knowledge and capabilities for influencing human behavior up to fifteen years ahead, or 1987. It foreshadows the enormous effort put into behavior control experiments employing the use of lasers and microwave beam weapons on involuntary human subjects during the Reagan-Bush regime.Thirdly, despite the report's title. Controlled Offensive Behavior - USSR. it opens with a chapter describing the use of torture on Catholic prisoners in British jails in Northern Ireland. The inclusion of this chapter at all, and its position at the front of the report. clearly is intended to suggest that it is permissible for the United States to torture its own citizens because these methods are being used by our very civilized cousins in Britain, and not only barbarians in the Soviet Union.Fourthly, the report states that, The purpose of mind altering techniques is to create one or more of several different possible states in the conscious or unconscious area of the brain. The ultimate goal of controlled offensive behavior might well be the total submission of one's will to some outside force.After discussing some of the possible states short of complete submission which may be the goal of Soviet research in behavior control, the author states, Since the desired end product of this type of research is some change in the human mind, only the non-lethal aspects are discussed in this report. It should be remembered, however, that some techniques have lethal thresholds.In the current round of American behavior control experiments, no allowance is made for lethal thresholds. The use of involuntary human subjects provided by the Central Intelligence Agency precludes the necessity for researchers to consider lethal thresholds and legal consequences.A curious situation has emerged in which torturers and murderers attend our meetings, address us on the failings of our own research, and misdirect us with papers on the benign effects of incubating eggs in 60-herz magnetic fields, in order to buy time for their own well paid and frequently lethal experiments on involuntary human subjects.Another document which will be of interest to those wishing baclground information concemmg the technology of political control is The Search for the Manchurian Candidate: The CIA and Mind Control by John Marks. It was published in 1977 but has recently 1,1988) been reprinted by Dell Publishing, with an introduction by Thomas Powers.Of special interest are the.chapters concerning experiments with electrodes in the brain, which were the true forerunner of current experimentation involving invading the human brain and nervous system with gigahertz frequency masers and microwave beam weapons.Of particular interest in the light of current developments are two paragraphs in the very last chapter which concern a Boston-based CIA front organization, the Scientific Engineering Institute, which still exists, not so incidentally. The SEI was initially established to do research on radar! In the 1960's the SEI added a wing devoted to life sciences, and hired a group of behavioral and medical scientists.Marks reports, One veteran recalls a colleague joking, If you could find the natural radio frequency of a person's sphincter, you could make him run out of the room real fast. Turning serious, the veteran states the technique was plausible. and he notes that many of The crazy ideas bandied about at lunch developed into concrete projects. Just how concrete that proposal to find the natural radio frequency of the human anal (and penile) sphincter became, Marks had no way of knowing at the lime he wrote his book.Lastly, I would like to cite another Defense Intelligence Agency report also prepared by the US Army. It is titled. Biological Effects of Elertromagnetic Radiation (Radiowaves and Microwaves) Eurasian Communist Countries It was published by the Defense Intelligence Agency in March, 1976.The importance of this report rests not on its content, much of which seems to remains classified, but in its acknowledgement of a shift in focus, in less than four years from a wide range of behavior control interests to just one, electromagnetic radiation.The date of this report is also significant: it was published when George Herbert Walker Bush became Director of Central Intelligence. Experiments on involuntary human subjects were rapidly authorized by the new Director, but to take place outside of the United States because of the wrath of Congress at that time.An experiment was begun in Edmomon. Alberta. Canada, under the aegis of an American oil company with which the DCI was on friendly terms. It consisted initially of blasting a man s brain with the microwave analog of sound waves for 2-3 hours a day. This has the effect of producing auditory hallucinations.For an explanation of how audible voices are broadcast directly into the brain, see _Microwave Auditory Effects and Applications_, James C. Lin, Ph.D., Thomas Springfield, ll, 1978. For audible volces and their uses in intelligence operations also see _The Body Electric; Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life_, Robert D. Becker, M.D. and Gary Selden, Morrow, N.Y., 1985, particularly pages 317 et seq.TECHNOLOGY & METHODSA further discussion of events leading up the present series of mind control experiments will have to await another occasion, in favor of a discussion of the technology ef which the United States is now possessed.As I have already indicated, one of the principal features of the weapon system is its ability to produce auditory effects, or hallucinations. Using these effects to broadcast defeat into the minds of the enemy was a particular dream of Lt. Gen. Leonard Perroots, U.SA.F. He hired droves of consultants to tell him how to use a microwave beam to implant ideas in the mind of the enemy, and to be perfectly fair, to urge on his own troops to superhuman deeds of valor.One consultant I have spoken with advised Perroots that it is no more possible to implant ideas in the brain with microwaves than it is possible to implant ideas in a computer with microwaves. He pointed out the impossibility of knowing where any particular bit of informaiion is stored.The effect this had on Perroots was really quite predictable, considering the hubris of the man, and his access to unlimited amounts of money through the bloated, American defense budget. He kept on hiring consultants until he found one who promised him results, knowing thai he, Perroots, would be long retired before anyone could safely say his fair- haired boy was a charlatan.The smug complacency of the former consultant I spoke with was equally predictable. When I confronted him with the fact that medical atrocities are being committed on innocent human beings, he refused to discuss the subject with me until I could describe the process to him. Subsequently, I stumbled across Lin's book on microwave auditory effects.I called the former consultant back again, and again implored him to step forward and be counted. This time, confronted with the process being used, he told me that I had to expiain to him the mechanism by which microwaves produce auditory effects! Changing tack, I told him that the mechanism is irrelevant; the process is being used on slave labor in efforts to create the Manchurian Candidate.His reaction was just as predictable as Perroots', given the isolation and arrogance of academia. He assured me that such experiments couldn't be going on because HE had Forestalled that happening. HE had told Lt. Gen. Perroots that it couldn't be done, so Perroots had gone out to fly a kite and forgotten about it.Actually, that is what should have happened Instead, Perroots turned to a man who promised him results. This man remembered the microwave analog audiograms used by Dr. Joseph Sharp to beam auditory hallucinations into his own head at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research in 1973. He promised Perroots that he would talk a human being to death if he was furnished with the equipment Sharp had used at Walter Reed, a slave, and personal security.This was the origin of the medical atrocities which begin in Edmonton, Alberta in 1976, under the protection of the Central Intelligence Agency, and continue to this day.By the fall of 1983, experiments had produced some communications equipment which far exceeded the simple dream of broadcasting defeat into the minds of the enemy. It is not only capable of producing auditory hallucinations, but visual hallucinations as well. The visual hallucinations have been described to me by a German artist, on whom this equipment is being used involuntarily, as having the quality of 35mm color slides.Besides these sensory hallucinations, the same equipment can be used to block all sensation. It is being used to distort and even completely block all senses. With it the ultimate in sensory deprivation experiments can be performed. There's no peaking under the electromagnetic blindfold this equipment creates.I should mention in this context, that the Central Intelligence Agency now has at its disposal the most evil, the most cunning torture devised by any government in all of human history. It is truly satanic in its moral and ethical implications. It is a torture which is commensurate with the degeneracy of a nation which is prepared and well on its way to polluting all life on earth into extinction.The torture I am writing of I can only descibe as thought deprivation. It is used in conjunction with sensory deprivation but it is in fact sensory deprivation times 10^(10).We are all famiiliar with the sensation of being exposed to very loud noises. They are irritating, and we try to remove ourselves from them. We might say, It's so noisy in here, I can't hear myself think.Human beings perceive thought as audible sound. It is something which we hear. We listen to ourselves think. This quality of listening to ourselves think, of hearing our own thoughts, can be extinguished by this device, so that it is _not_ possible to hear oneself think.I have no idea how this effect is produced. It may be accomplished by playing a signal into the auditory nerve at such a high power that it does in fact drown out the sound of all thought, but I do not believe that is how it is being done. I do not know enough about the physiology of the brain to explain how it might be done, but the Central Intelligence Agency can do it with the mind control technology at its disposal.That is the bad news. The good news is that one continues to think even if one cannot hear oneself think. Do not panic. There is nothing to fear.On the other hand, our thought process is what distinguishes man from other forms of life. Cogito ergo sum. But cogito is no longer necessarily possible. Where does this leave sum?Furthermore, this communications equipment is able to produce pain, enormous amounts of pain. Pain is only another nerve signal, and pain is applied in great quantities in the torture regimen.Sometimes the pain is specific and describable, more often it is general and indescnbable. It is very much like being immersed in water, only it isn't water it is pain The pain surges and laps at one. like water.I have also described this pain as being very much like having an electric current passing through one's body. It is like having one's finger held in an electric socket and being unable to turn the current off. Except, this torture is used for years on end.A skeptic might well ask why? If the United States has such equipment, why is it being used to torture innocents and not Saddam Hussein?. The answer is the cowardice factor.It is quite one thing to torture innocents for a few hours a day, a few days a week, and then retire to a nearby hotel to soak your liver in beer served from frosty mugs. It is quite another to spend your afternoons and evenings in Baghdad, confined to a room commensurate with your cover story, because you don't speak Arabic, wondering how soon you will be betrayed.This is the cowardice factor. What good is it to earn big bucks if your life is put at risk? Paitriotism? Forget about it. Torturing a man through a cinder block wall is the ultimate act of cowardice. The mere invention is a reflection of the complete moral and phy.sial corruption of American society.But America is also an intellectually corrupt country. Once the Central Intelligence Agency had discovered the Fountain of Death, it didn't know how to use it. The best idea they could come up with was to resurrect the protocols of the infamous Dr. Ewen Cameron, subsiitftung the new technology for the low tech equipment he had employed.Readers who are interested in the protocols of the deranged Dr. Cameron may consult John Marks' book, cited earlier. There have recently been several books published on the subject of Cameron, as well. This new interest resulted from survivors of his medical atrocities suing the CIA for compensation.Among the books recently published, I would recommend Journey Into Madness by Clordon Thomas. The American edition came out in May, 1990.A skeptic might also ask how it is possible to apply the Cameron brainwashing technique, called depatterning, to an American citizen in the privacy of his own home. This is in fact the $64 dollar question, with no obvious answer to rational men and women.Firstly, every effort is made to incarcerate the victim in a friendly hospital where his or her mind can be crushed at the leisure of the CIA- Failmg this it is usually possible to at least get a false diagnosis from a corrupt physician that the victim has a potential psychiatric problem which may require institutionalization at some future date.The effor to incarcerate the victim requires the cooperation of someone in the victim's family or work environment. The Central Intelligence Agency uses the term authority figure to describe this player, because he or she is an authority on the victim, and will step forward at the appropriate moment and demand that the victim be incarcerated or agree with the physician that the victim should be incarnated.Failing the presence of an authority, the victim may simply be kidnapped and placed in confinement, or the CIA may use unlawfu1 restraint to hold the victim in confinement temporarily. It's not a pretty picture.If all attempts at incarceration fail. or when the victim must be released, then the victim is tortured m the pnvacy of his own home- This is possible because the effects are produced by electromagnetic radiation, which passes freely through seemingly solid wallsThe brainwashing begins by picking victims who are isolated in the first place, preferrably living alone, by soliciting the cooperation of the victims friends and acquaintances. In other societies these people wouldn't be called friends, they would be called informers.The Central Intelligence Agency then attempts to isolate the individual from people whom they plan to corrupt -- the victlm's support network. This is done by making the victim difficult to be with. At the same tune, every effort is made to make the vktim suspicious of his friends and colleagues so he will avoid them of his own, free will.To augment this process, members of the victims support network may simply be purchased to spread rumors concerning the victim, with the intention of further isolating him or her. This aspect of the process may be and is, carried to the extreme of simply murdering members of the victims support network.The process of discrediting the victim, isolating the victim, is a continuous one, and isolating the victim from members of the opposite sex, particularly potential sex partners, is a central feature of this process.This is the background. The foreground is the adaptation of the Cameron depatterning technique. The central feature of this is to use microwave auditory effects in place of the tapeplayer and headset which Cameron used in a part of the process called psychic driving.The microwave auditory effects are used to humiliate and ridicule the victim, and to express the torturers contempt for the victim, which is also expressed through the application of copious amounts of pain.Contempt is also expressed by breaking and entering the victims home and burglarizing it on a daily basis. The victim is allowed no privacy whatsoever His every action is commented on disparagingly. This is accomplished by bugging the victim's home with an array of devices, including video and sound sensors.The quality of the bugging equipment available to the CIA today is beyond the imagination of the average man. These sensors have been miniaturized to the point where no visual inspection will every discover them. And they are sensitive beyond belief The bugging devices themselves could be the subject of a separate paper.CONCLUSIONThe Manchurian Candidate 1990 is quite a different fellow than his 1956 counterpart. He is no longer an hypnoticaly preprogrammed assaassin; his behavior is programmed and fed into a computer, which biomechanically drives him to his predetermined and destructive destiny, just like the cruise missiles manufactured by General Electric AerospaceWhen I pick up a copy of Blomedica1 Engineering, I am struck by the fact that all of the research in it is unnecessary, duplicates research accomplished five to 15 years ago by the Central Intelligence Agency. The difference between our research and theirs is that scientists employed by the CIA work on involuntary human subjects, slaves if you will, furnished to them by their employer. They do not have to be concerned with lethal thresholds.The process which the microwave weapon employs is described in a paper titled, The Electromagnetic Spectrum in Low-Intensity Conflict, by Cap. Paul E. Tyler, Medical Command, United States Navy. His paper, presented at least a year after the murder which leaves no traces had already been perfected, sets forth the coneptual basis from which the development of the microwave beam weaponry began. It is worth reading.Captain Tyler's paper was presented at a workshop conducted by Air University Center for Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education in March, 1984. His paper is included in a collection titled, Low-Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology, edited by Lt. Col. David J. Dean, United States Air Force, and published by Air University Press, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama in June, 1986. The book is available from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402.If there are skeptics among you, and I hope that there are, the benign results of the Central Intelligence Agency's research can be seen on television nearly every night. Take a film clip of George Herbert Walker Bush at the end of the Malta summit with President Gorbachev and compare it with a film clip of George Bush campaigning for the Republican nomination in 1988. The pitch of his voice has been significantly lowered, he speaks in complete sentences and no longer in sentence fragments, and his gestures are appropriate to the oratorical point he is making rather than empty and fluttery gesticulations.I have no problem with the CIA's enhancing George Bush's public image. After all, he is former Director of Central Intelligence, and authorized experiments on involuntary human subjects with maser and microwave beam weapons in February, 1976.I have more trouble with the use of this equipment to neutralize Michael Dukakis' campaign for President in 1988, by making his public image wooden and plodding.I have even more trouble with the use of this equipment to bring Kitty Dukakis to the brink of suicide, in order to enhance the prospects of George Bush's choice of politicalopponent in 1992 Jesse Jackson. Now that the Supreme Court has been neutralized as an instrument for social justice, neutralizing the Congress has become the Central Intelligence Agencys principal objective. A Jackson nomination is most likely to divide and crush the Democratic Party.Think about what I have written. Perhaps it will help to explain classified work which is going on in a laboratory near you. Perhaps it will even help to explain work which you have been asked to do.What do you know about research aimed at the computer control of human beings through masers aimed at acupuncture points, or muscle groups?What do you know about the torture and rape and murder of persons of both sexes using masers and microwave beam weapons designed to be used in combat training and simulation systems?What do you know about a magnetic beam weapon, meant to temporarily disable any device employing an electric motor, or transistors, without permanently damaging it?What do you know about the development of a tactile intelligence exploitation system designed to maintain control of political activists as they travel, anywhere in the world?If you have such information, have a few words with me before the end of the of Workshop, or speak out on this subject in a forum of your own choosing. The more who speak out, the less likely it is that any one of us will be victimized for what we say.In any case, only the illusion of Constitutional government remains in the United States. Do not be afraid. The worst is yet to come.REFERENCES1. This 54 page report went out of print in March, 1990. It is available at libraries which have been designated Government Document Depositories.2. For a discussion of a similar weapon, see An X-Band Microwave Life-Detection System in IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol 33, No. 7; July, 1986.3. This information was leaked by a British scientist to a British investigator, and appears in City limits, London, Aug 9 - Aug 16, 1990. This weapon is described as a microwave pulse radar, and is believed to work by rapidly heating the brain.4. Super-high frequency radiation is a term applied to wave lengths between a decimeter and centimeter long. It corresponds roughly with a frequency range of 1-100 gigahertz.5. Controlled Offensive Behavior - USSR, by Captain John D. LaMothe, Medical Intelligence Office. Department of the Army. This intelligence document was published by the Defense Intelligence Agency in July, 1972.About the AuthorHarlan E. Girard was born in Cleveland, OH in 1936. He studied for the B. Chem. E. degree at Cornell University, and received the B.A. degree in economics from The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, from which he graduated in 1957.Since 1988, Mr. Girard has been pursuing independent research into the harmful effects ot radiation on biological systems. He is a member of the Bioelectromagnetics Society and IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.In 1989, the Federal Bureau of Investigation refused Mr. Girard access to his own file on the grounds that it is 93exempt from mandatory release on the basis of 5 U.S.C. a7522 (b) (1)94. This section of the United States Code is applicable to documents 93 to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy.Mr. Girard is flattered to have been made a peer of J. Robert Oppenheimer et al., despite the fact that he has never applied for a security clearance from the Department of Defense or held a job which required one. On the other hand, since 1983, he has been an involuntary human subject in medical experiments commissioned by the Central Intelligence Agency, which has of course made him privy to a great deal of highly classified and extremely sensitive information.To: OTP.InformationDesk@icc-cpi.int,'FEED - Union of Concerned Scientists' ,katherine friedli ,Kathernine Friendi ,Karoline Astrid , Astrid ,moss david posner , uk@un.int, usa@un.int,haarpmindcontrol@gmail.com, alw@peaceinspace.org,"ACLU Anthony D. Romero" ,ACLU-NJ , ACLUOnline@aclu.org, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov,Lynn SurgallaCc: International Red Cross
Read more…
http://www.capwiz.com/now/issues/alert/?alertid=13804716#action TAKE ACTION ON Urge House Members Today to Support Single-Payerhttp://action.lcv.org/campaign/enews_cleanwater TAKE ACTION ONThe Senate Must Protect Our Drinking Waterhttps://secure2.convio.net/appf/site/SPageServer?pagename=Petition_to_HIT_PC&JServSessionIdr011=9setx086q1.app2b TAKE ACTION ON Sign this petition and make it clear:Americans should control electronic health records!http://capwiz.com/africaaction/callalert/index.tt?alertid=13807491 TAKE ACTION ON Act Now For Peace in Darfur and All Sudan!http://act.credoaction.com/campaign/gang_of_6/?r=4463&id=5220-554884-uHXylLx TAKE ACTION ON Tell the Gang of 6: Give back your dirty insurance money.http://www.standupforhealthcare.org/page/s/callingeneral TAKE ACTION ON Tell Congress: NOW is the time for health care reform.http://action.foodandwaterwatch.org/t/5915/petition.jsp?petition_KEY=1988 TAKE ACTION ON Protect and Strengthen our Public Water - Support a Water Protection and Reinvestment Trust Fund!http://actioncenter.org/take_action/30 TAKE ACTION ON Urge Congress to Cut Hunger in Halfhttp://www.one.org/us/climatefive//signed.html?registered=1&petition_id=163&redirect_url=%2Fus%2Fclimatefive%2F%2Fsigned.html&id=1100-4154086-4WTWm2x&t=2 TAKE ACTION ON Your name has been added to our petition asking your senators to make sure this year's climate legislation commits 5% of any revenue to helping the world's most vulnerable people make the infrastructure upgrades and other development investments needed to meet the challenges of climate change.http://action.savedarfur.org/campaign/grationhearingcomm/33xd5wwr9738mbdm? TAKE ACTION ON Tell the Senate: Ask tough questions of General GrationThe Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Thursday could determine the fate of the US plan for peace in Sudan—which could ultimately determine the fate of millions.http://act.truemajorityaction.org/p/7002/appropriations?petition_KEY=126 TAKE ACTION ON Pledge to fight Pentagon wastehttps://secure3.convio.net/aahf/site/Advocacy?alertId=407&pg=makeACall&JServSessionIdr011=3mv3lt7nd2.app306b TAKE ACTION ON Food Safety Bill Quietly Scheduled for a Vote on House Floor Call Your Representative Now!http://www.ahrchk.net/ua/support.php?ua=UAC-088-2009 TAKE ACTION ON > SRI LANKA: Police in Katugastota torture and frame a man> INDIA: The government must do more to help 163 Dalit households affected by a social boycott> INDIA: Another child died of malnutrition while fifty one children malnourished in Saledhana village, Madhya Pradesh> NEPAL: Police torture two men in front of a crowd and threaten human rights defenders in Morang> INDIA: Social boycott and mob violence waged against Dalits in Becharpura> PAKISTAN: Police officers participate in the rape and murder of a woman and no investigation is carried out> UPDATE (Sri Lanka): A police officer on trial for the murder of Gerald Perera remains in service at Gampaha Police Station> INDIA: Police in Gujarat support the beating and social exclusion of three Dalit families> INDIA: Three children died of malnutrition for past two months and four children are currently suffering from malnutrition in Dahbiya village of Madhya Pradesh where children had died of malnutrition in 2008> PHILIPPINES: Soldiers torture a man with electric shocks to his sex organ to force a confessionhttp://www.capwiz.com/wand/callalert/index.tt?alertid=13804841&type=CO TAKE ACTION ON Oppose Missile Defense Funding Increasehttp://healthcareforamericanow.org/page/speakout/affordability TAKE ACTION ON Health care for you, or more money for millionaireshttps://secure2.convio.net/scv/site/Donation2?idb=1211586928&df_id=4300&4300.donation=form1 TAKE ACTION ON 60 Sponsors for 60 Children Imagine the difference this will make...http://withstringsattached.org/legislative-lookup/ TAKE ACTION ON Congress should investigate whether Israel committed human rights abuses against civilians in Gaza in its December-January offensive. Human rights organizations have documented as much. Now it’s time for Congress to investigate. We do not want to send another blank check.http://action.foodandwaterwatch.org/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=27502 TAKE ACTION ON Protect our Oceans, Coastal Communities and Consumers Ask Dr. Lubchenco to reject a reckless plan to allow ocean fish farming in U.S. waters.https://secure2.convio.net/nwlc/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=379 TAKE ACTION ONhttp://action.americanfuturefund.com/aff/home/ TAKE ACTION ON Legislative Alerts and Updates* Oppose New Taxes and Cap and TaxA $2 Trillion Tax Is The Last Thing We Need* Oppose the Sotomayer Nomination* Please say no to Cap and TaxA $2 Trillion Tax Increase the the Last Thing We Need* Tell your Senators that Enough is Enough!It's time to ease the tax burden, not crush our job creators* Say No to the Health Care BoardWashington Bureaucrats Shouldn't Make Our Health Care Decisions* Please Oppose the Solis Nomination for Labor SecretaryYet Another Obama Cabinet Nominee Has Trouble With Taxes* Oppose Leon PanettaHis Conflicts of Interest Make Him Unqualified* Tell the Senate to Reject the House's Auto-Bailout BillThose who caused this mess aren't being held accountablehttps://secure.ga0.org/02/090728_appeal_climatechange/nr7_ZvN7q0ube?source=isa090730001 TAKE ACTION ON Turn back the tide against dirty energy's power grab!http://www.avaaz.org/en/tell_clinton_no_pipeline/?cl=280461157&v=3696 TAKE ACTION ON Email Clinton: Stop the tar sandshttp://action.cmep.org/t/4317/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=1000 TAKE ACTION ONhttp://members.greenpeace.org/survey/start/158/ TAKE ACTION ON Thanks for telling Trader Joe's to get serious about sustainable seafoodhttps://secure2.convio.net/cagw/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=607 TAKE ACTION ON Tell Congress: Vote NO on Obama/Pelosi/Reid Healthcare Reform!https://secure.freepress.net/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=333&JServSessionIdr011=71ei6ib8p2.app46b TAKE ACTION ON Get the Real Internet in Your Pockethttps://secure.consumersunion.org/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=2135 TAKE ACTION ON When did our healthiest foods become dangerous? We can pass food safety reform THIS WEEKif Congress hears from enough people like you!http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/1439/t/9410/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=1298 TAKE ACTION ON Urge Your Rep to Sign Grijalva Letter for More US Pressure on Coup Regime in Hondurashttp://www.capwiz.com/clw/issues/alert/?alertid=13803536&type=CO TAKE ACTION ON Urge your Representative to vote for amendments to the Defense Authorization Bill that de-fund missile defensehttp://www.commoncause.org/site/apps/ka/ct/contactus.asp?c=dkLNK1MQIwG&b=5327637&en=btLPJ0OCK7JMJZNEKeLUKeORJeJNI5PPLgIYIiN2G TAKE ACTION ON The Common Ground on Health Care Declarationhttp://secure.habitat.org/c.fpIQK4OyFkG/b.5287815/k.BD8/Ask_Congress_Support_Neighborhood_Revitalization/siteapps/advocacy/ActionItem.aspx TAKE ACTION ON ASK CONGRESS: SUPPORT NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATIONhttp://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2167/t/5243/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=27717 TAKE ACTION ON Real Protection for Roadless Areas Needed Nowhttps://secure2.convio.net/cagw/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=607 TAKE ACTION ON Tell Congress: Vote NO on Obama/Pelosi/Reid Healthcare Reform!https://online.nwf.org/site/Advocacy?JServSessionIdr011=ogk9c7cg55.app20b&cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=965 TAKE ACTION ON Help Pass America's Wildlife Heritage Acthttps://secure.prochoiceamerica.org/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=3885 TAKE ACT ION ON Keep Anti-Choice Extremism Out Of Health-Care Reformhttps://secure2.convio.net/nwlc/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=373 TAKE ACTION ON Support the House Health Reform Bill (H.R. 3200)http://www.pleasehelpusmrsnixon.com/ TAKE ACTION ONOther Advocacy Campaigns you can participate in:* Call Chase to Help End Mountaintop Removal* Take 5 minutes for clean energy in Canada* Demand that Ontario Respect Native Land Rights* Stand Up for Indigenous Rights* We Don't Want Dirty Tar Sands Oil!* Get Citi Out of Dirty Coal* Tell BMO to bank your money on a clean energy future for Canada.* Tell CIBC to bank your money on a clean energy future for Canada.* Tell Desjardins to keep banking your money on a clean energy future for Canada.* Tell RBC to bank your money on a clean energy future for Canada.* Tell Scotiabank to bank your money on a clean energy future for Canada.* Tell TD to bank your money on a clean energy future for Canada.* Tell Vancity to keep banking your money on a clean energy future for Canada.* Tell the EPA to Stop Mountaintop Removal* Tell the TVA to Take Responsibility for Toxic Coal Spills!* Join the Hershey's Week of Action on April 6-12* Take action on August 13 with our Stickering Day of Action!* Valentine's Palm Oil Stickering!* Al Gore Belongs in Jail* Stop Palm Oil Expansion into Indonesia's Peatlands* Don't Let Agribusiness Destroy the Rainforest!* Protect Rivers from Mountaintop Removal Coal Mining!* Don't Let Big Coal Save Mountaintop Removal* Don't Let Paper Companies Get a Tax Credit for Destroying the Planet!* Help President Obama see the truth about mountaintop removal* Ford, Make Us Clean Cars!* Roger Penske: We Want Action!* Tell Ford and GM to Say No to Ethanol!* Tell Penske to Help Stop Global Warming!* A Phone Call for Grassy Narrows* Ask Chase CEO Jamie Dimon to Be a Leader Against Mountaintop Removal* Tell Bank of America: Coal is Over! Fund the Future!* Tell Bank of America: Coal is Over! Fund the Future!* Tell Bank of the West: Don't finance a second Chernobyl!* Tell Citi and Bank of America: Coal is Over! Fund the Future!* Tell Wells Fargo to Stop Funding Mountaintop Removal* You Own Citibank, One of the Leading Funders of Coal.221 Pine Street, 5th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94104 USA | 415 398 4404 | 415 398 2732 fax | answers@ran.orgneue Kampagnen - campaigns of this weekWorldEnvironmentalonly UShttp://www.flokli.ch/index.php?page=251World To: United NationsEnd Violence in Schools... Plan USA take actionWorld To: World LeadersSupport Women to Breastfeed... ONE Million Campaign take actionRussia To: Russian AuthoritiesCondemn Murder of Russian Human Rights Defender... Amnesty US take actionRussia To: President MedvedevInvestigate Killing of Russian Human Rights Defender... Human Rights First take actionRussia To: President MedvedevHuman Rights Activist Natalie Estemirova Abducted and Murdered... The Hub take actionDRC To: Various CompaniesEndorse the Conflict Minerals Pledge... Raise Hope for Congo take actionSudan To: President ObamaSupport Peace for all of Sudan... Refugees International take actionAsia Pacific To: Head of Social & Environmental Affairs AdidasEnsure your Workers have decent Pay And Conditions... Oxfam Australia take actionIran to: the Head of the JudiciaryRelease Detainees Held in Aftermath of Disputed Election in Iran... human rights first take actionIndonesia To: Polo Ralph Lauren & Tomy HilfigerLuxury Fashion Brands leave Indonesian Workers out in the cold... CCC take actionIran To: The Iranian AuthoritiesProtect Election Protesters... Amnesty UK take actionTibet To: The Chineses AuthoritiesRelease Dhondup Wangchen... SFFT take actionColombia To; US Dept of JusticeInvestigate Dole's links with Paramilitaries... ILRF take actionUS To: Attorney General HolderDemand Accountability for Torture, Appoint a Special Prosecutor... Codepink take actionUS To: Whole Foods & UNFIOrganic means respecting Workers Rights... OCA take actionUS To: Coke CEOTell us where Dasani comes from... Corporate Accountability International take actionUS To: Wall Street journalCorrect False Claim that Hondurans Support Coup... Just Foreign Policy take actionUS To: Governor SchwarzeneggerDon't Fast Track Methyl Iodide... UFW take actionUS To: President ObamaIs the US Funding Human Rights Abuses in Gaza... JVP take actionUS To: President ObamaTen Against Torture... Amnesty US take actionUS To: Texas Board of EducationDon't remove Cesar Chavez and Thurgood Marshall from School Books... UFW take actionUS To: President ObamaPlease welcome Refugees... IRC take actionUK only To: Your MPJust Add Water... Progressio take actionUKHelp to save Bluefin Tuna... Greenpeace UK take actionKenya To: Secretary General CITESPermanently Ban the Sale of Ivory...care2 take actionKenya To: Minister of Tourism & WildlifeSave Lions from Poisoning from Carbofuran Pesticide... care2 take actionIndia To: Prime Minister SinghSign up to deposit your Litre of Water... Greenpeace India take actionJapan To: President ObamaHelp end Whale & Dolphin Killings in Japan... NRDC take actionAmazon To: Reebok, Adidas, Timberland & ClarksProtect the Amazon and the climate... Greenpeace UK take actionAmazon To: NikeThank Nike for protecting the Amazon and the Climate... Greenpeace take actionUS To: Secretary VilsackStop the National Animal ID System... Food & water Watch take actionUS To: President ObamaDon't put GMO Boosters in charge of Food Safety... OCA take actionUS To: Interior Secretary SalazarProtect America's Treasured Wildlands... NRDC take actionUS To: The EPAReduce Pollution from the Nations Cement Plants... NRDC take actionUS To: Interior Secretary SalazarPut Wolves back on the Endangered Species List... NRDC take actionUS only To: Attorney General HolderStart Torture investigation with Cheney and Addington... CREDOaction take actionUS only To: Your SenatorsNo more Unfair Military Commissions... Human Rights First take actionUS only To: The FCCPut a People Powered Internet First... freepress take actionUS only To: Leading RepublicansRenounce Rush, Stand with Sonia... credoaction take actionUS To: Attorney General HolderAppoint a Special Prosecutor to Investigate Torture... Voters for Peace take actionUS only To: CongressRepeal "Don't ask, Don't tell"... change.org take actionUS only To: members of CongressSupport Democracy in Honduras... LAWG take actionUS only To: Your CongresspersonUrge the House not to cut Sam's Funding... No School for Sam take actionUS only To: Your SenatorSign to Stop the F22...True Majority take actionUS only To: Your RepresentativeStand up for Human Rights and Democracy in Honduras... SOA Watch take actionUS only To: Interior Secretary SalazarOrder an Immediate Investigation into the "Atlantis" Oil & Gas Platform... Food & Water Watch take actionUS only To: Interior Secretary SalazarProtect Lands adjacent to Katmai, Lake Clark from Industrial Mining... NPCA take actionUS only To: Your SenatorsMaintain Protection against Global Warming Pollution... FOE take actionUS only To: Interior Secretary SalazarProtect Alaska's National Parks from Industrial Mining... change.org take actionUS only To: Secretary VilsackDon't Log Tongass National Forest... CREDOaction take actionUS only To: Your SenatorsUrge your Senators to pass a Strong Climate and Energy Bill Now...NRDC take actionUS only To: Your SenatorsClean Energy Now... Earthjustice take actionPrivacy Policy | Anti-oppression Principles | Non-violence Statement
Read more…
July 27, 2009In this MegaVote for Mississippi's 3rd Congressional District:Recent Congressional Votes* Senate: Thune Amendment; Reciprocity for the Carrying of Certain Concealed Firearms* Senate: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010* House: Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2009* House: Department of Transportation, and Housing and Urban Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010* House: Labor-HHS-Education Appropriations Act, 2010Upcoming Congressional Bills* Senate: Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010* House: Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2010* House: Corporate and Financial Institution Compensation Fairness Act of 2009Recent Senate VotesThune Amendment; Reciprocity for the Carrying of Certain Concealed Firearms - Vote Rejected (58-39, 3 Not Voting)The Senate could not reach the necessary sixty votes to include this gun provision in the National Defense Authorization Act. The amendment would have allowed citizens who have concealed carry permits from their states to carry concealed firearms in another state that grants concealed carry permits.Sen. Thad Cochran voted YES......send e-mail or see bioSen. Roger Wicker voted YES......send e-mail or see bioNational Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 - Vote Passed (87-7, 6 Not Voting)The Senate passed this bill that sets funding levels for the military and authorizes Department of Defense programs, which includes reduced funding for the F-22 fighter jet.Sen. Thad Cochran voted YES......send e-mail or see bioSen. Roger Wicker voted YES......send e-mail or see bioRecent House VotesStatutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2009 - Vote Passed (265-166, 3 Not Voting)On Wednesday, the House voted to reinstitute and update the Pay-As-You-Go requirement of budget neutrality on new tax and mandatory spending legislation.Rep. Gregg Harper voted NO......send e-mail or see bioDepartment of Transportation, and Housing and Urban Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010 - Vote Passed (256-168, 9 Not Voting)The House passed this $123.1 billion bill funding transportation and housing programs for the next fiscal year.Rep. Gregg Harper voted NO......send e-mail or see bioLabor-HHS-Education Appropriations Act, 2010 - Vote Passed (264-153, 16 Not Voting)The House approved this $160.7 billion bill funding the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education and other related agencies and programs.Rep. Gregg Harper voted NO......send e-mail or see bioUpcoming VotesEnergy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010 - H.R.3183The Senate is scheduled to begin work on this bill funding the Department of Energy, Army Corps of Engineers and related agencies and programs.Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2010 - H.R.3326The House is scheduled to vote on this bill funding the Department of Defense.Corporate and Financial Institution Compensation Fairness Act of 2009 - H.R.3269The House is scheduled to work on this bill that intends to provide shareholders with an advisory vote on executive compensation and to prevent certain incentives in the compensation practices of financial institutions.
Read more…
Getting to Zero Update28 July 2009http://www.basicint.org/about.htmPlease note, BASIC and Crisis Action have a bi-weekly update devoted solely to diplomatic developments related to Iran's nuclear program, which may be found at the following web address: www.basicint.org/update/iran.htm.Previous editions of BASIC's GTZ Update are available here.To subscribe or unsubscribe from this update, please visit the following page: www.basicint.org/contacts/index.php.IN THIS ISSUE:* BASIC and Getting to Zero (GTZ)* Commitments to Disarmament and Arms Control* Country Reportso United Stateso United Kingdomo Irano North Koreao Russiao Indiao Pakistan* Missile Defense* Additional PublicationsBASIC and Getting to Zero (GTZ)BASIC is delighted to announce the appointment of its new Program Director in Washington, Anne Penketh. She has a distinguished career as an international journalist, and was most recently Diplomatic Editor of The Independent (London). Anne began her reporting on nuclear weapons issues at the Geneva and Reykjavik Summits in 1985-6 between Presidents Reagan and Gorbachev. In recent years she has continued to work on disarmament and non-proliferation issues, including covering diplomatic maneuvers at the United Nations over Iran's nuclear program. Anne will start in August. For more information, please see BASIC's Media Advisory.Nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament were on the agenda of both the G8 Summit meeting in L'Aquila, Italy and the U.S.-Russia Summit in Moscow. Two weeks later, U.K. Prime Minister Gordon Brown released his Road to 2010 report on nuclear energy and weapons, which was quickly followed by private briefings indicating that the design contract for the Trident nuclear weapons submarine system would be delayed until after the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Review Conference in May 2010. See these BASIC publications and Update sections below for more information.* The UK Government's Road to 2010 —much to welcome— but still looking underdeveloped in key areasPaul Ingram, BASIC Media Advisory, July 16, 2009http://www.basicint.org/pubs/Press/090716.htm* The START follow-on negotiations: Russians focus on delivery vehiclesJonathan McLaughlin, BASIC Getting to Zero Papers, No. 14, July 1, 2009http://www.basicint.org/gtz/gtz14.htm* The Shadow NATO Summit: Options for NATO - pressing the reset button on the strategic conceptJoint report by BASIC, ISIS-Europe, Bertelsmann Stiftung and NATO Watch, on inaugural Shadow NATO Summit of 31 March - 1 April 2009, posted 23 July 2009.http://www.basicint.org/pubs/natoshadow.pdfVisit the GTZ Blog.Commitments to Disarmament and Arms ControlObama and Medvedev sign agreement on the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) follow-onAfter months of preparations, U.S. President Barack Obama arrived in Moscow on July 6 for a two-day summit with Russian President Dmitri Medvedev. The "reset" summit included both leaders signing a Joint Understanding for the START Follow-on Treaty, which commits the two nations to an agreement that will reduce the number of strategic nuclear warheads and delivery vehicles to a range of 1,500-1,675, and 500-1,100 respectively. Negotiating delegations are led by Rose Gottemoeller, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State, and Anatoly Antonov, Russia's Chief of Security and Disarmament Issues. The 1991 START agreement, which expires on December 5, allows for a total of 6,000 warheads on 1,600 strategic delivery vehicles, and the 2002 Moscow Treaty - Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty (SORT) - set limits between 1,700-2,200 operationally deployed strategic warheads by 2012, but without verification. U.S. and Russian negotiators met again on July 22 and 23. Reports from Geneva were positive, but had few details.G-8 Summit in L'AquilaLeaders at the Group of Eight (G8) Summit in L'Aquila, Italy (8-10 July) issued a statement on non-proliferation which declared, "We are all committed to seeking a safer world for all and to creating the conditions for a world without nuclear weapons, in accordance with the goals of the NPT." The leaders supported U.S. President Obama's desire to seek ratification of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), and called for bringing the treaty into force. The statement urged Iran to engage diplomatically with the international community, and sharply criticized the May nuclear test in North Korea. At the G8 Summit, U.S. President Obama presented his plan to host a Global Nuclear Security Summit on March 9 and 10, 2010, which would provide a platform for multilateral discussion on such issues as cooperatively combating international nuclear smuggling and nuclear terrorism.IAEA selects new chiefOn July 2, Yukiya Amano was selected by the IAEA Board of Governors to be the next Secretary-General. He replaces Mohamed ElBaradei, whose term will end in November 2009. Amano has been the favored pick of the United States and Europe, and will be the first East Asian to serve as Director General of the IAEA. The alternative candidate, South Africa's Abdul Samad Minty, was supported by the representatives of countries of the developing world who perceive tighter non-proliferation rules as undue limitations to their development of peaceful nuclear energy whilst nuclear weapon states avoid their own responsibilities to disarm. After the election, Amano asked for the "solidarity of all the member states," and assured developing countries that the IAEA is not just a "nuclear watchdog."Further Reading* Test Ban Monitoring: No Place to Hide (Summary - full article requires subscription)Daniel Cleary, Science, Vol. 325, no. 5939, pp. 382-385, July 24, 2009http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/325/5939/382* Talking About Nuclear Weapons Policy: Lessons from Recent Public Opinion and Messaging ResearchU.S. in the World (USITW) presentation, summary and link to report available on the website of the Connect U.S. Fund, July 2009http://www.connectusfund.org/resources/talking-about-nuclear-weapons-policy-lessons-recent-public-opinion-and-messaging-research* Rebutting the standard arguments against disarmamentGeorge Perkovich and James M. Acton, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, July 15, 2009http://www.thebulletin.org/web-edition/op-eds/rebutting-the-standard-arguments-against-disarmament* A Flash of MemoryIssey Miyake, The New York Times, July 13, 2009http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/14/opinion/14miyake.html?_r=1&th&emc=th* Plumage—But at a PriceCharles Krauthammer, The Washington Post, July 9, 2009http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/09/AR2009070902363.html?hpid=opinionsbox1* START Follow-On: What SORT of Agreement?Hans M. Kristensen, FAS Strategic Security Blog, July 8, 2009http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2009/07/start.php* Addressing the Nuclear Threat: Fulfilling the Promise of Prague at the L'Aquila SummitWhite House, Office of the Press Secretary July 8, 2009http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Addressing-the-Nuclear-Threat-Fulfilling-the-Promise-of-Prague-at-the-LAquila-Summit/* L'Aquila Statement on Non-ProliferationG-8 Summit July 8, 2009http://www.g8italia2009.it/static/G8_Allegato/2._LAquila_Statent_on_Non_proliferation,0.pdf* Joint Understanding, Obama-Medvedev SummitWhite House, Office of the Press Secretary July 8, 2009http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/The-Joint-Understanding-for-The-START-Follow-On-Treaty/* Nuclear powers come in from the coldRebecca Johnson, Comment is Free, The Guardian, July 7, 2009 http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jul/07/nuclear-powers-us-russia* US and Russia agree nuclear disarmament road mapLuke Harding and Julian Borger, The Guardian, July 6, 2009http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jul/06/obama-medvedev-nuclear-weapons-disarmament* A Chance for a Nuclear-Free WorldJames F. Collins and Jack Matlock, Foreign Policy, July 6, 2009http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2009/07/06/a_chance_for_a_nuclear_free_world* Serbia, IAEA sign additional protocol on non-proliferation of nuclear weaponsChina View, July 4, 2009http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-07/04/content_11649540.htm* Global Zero Action PlanJune 29, 2009http://www.globalzero.org/files/pdf/gzap_3.0.pdfCountry ReportsUnited StatesObama's commitment to nuclear disarmamentU.S. President Barack Obama continues to show a serious commitment to nuclear disarmament, and has repeatedly focused on issues of arms control in his communications. Analysts have gone so far as to suggest that arms control is a fundamental part of his Presidential strategy, and that it is part of an emerging "Obama Doctrine." The New York Times ran a major story on Obama's activism as a senior at Columbia University in 1983 on issues of nuclear disarmament, and argued that Obama has long been committed to a world without nuclear weapons.Clinton says she considers disarmament a priorityAt a presentation at the Council on Foreign Relations, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said, "We want to reverse the spread of nuclear weapons, prevent their use, and build a world free of their threat." Clinton reiterated that the United States stands ready to engage diplomatically with Iran, although she said that opportunity will not last forever, and also affirmed that the United States was pursuing "complete and verifiable denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula." (See more information below on the latest reports from Iran and North Korea.)Further Reading* Influential Republicans Could Throw Weight Behind CTBTGlobal Security Newswire, July 27, 2009http://www.globalsecuritynewswire.org/gsn/nw_20090727_1871.php* Senate warns against concessions on nuclear treatyJim Abrams, The Associated Press, via Seattle Times, July 27, 2009http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2009543802_apusnucleartreaty.html?syndication=rss* A Guide to the Challenges Facing President Obama's Nuclear Abolition AgendaBurgess Laird, Carnegie Council on Ethics in International Affairs, July 21, 2009http://www.cceia.org/resources/articles_papers_reports/0025.html* The Donald ReportBlog entry provides link to large report:Investigation into the Shipment of Sensitive Missile Components to Taiwan(report posted on the site of the New America Foundation)Jeffrey Lewis, Arms Control Wonk.com, July 21, 2009http://www.armscontrolwonk.com/2394/donald-report* Obama Puts Arms Control at the Core of New StrategyPeter Spiegel, The Wall Street Journal, July 15, 2009http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124761759094642419.html* It is Important to Get Nuclear Weapons Policy RightLawrence Eagleburger, The Wall Street Journal, July 15, 2009 http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124762192770242767.html* Obama's Weapons Policy is SensibleWilliam D. Hartung, The Wall Street Journal, July 14, 2009http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124753205977636027.html* Russian nuclear agreement a good startSenator Dianne Feinstein, San Francisco Chronicle, July 10, 2009http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/07/10/EDNI18LBEP.DTL* An Obama Doctrine Emerges in MoscowJoe Cirincione, Huffington Post, July 8, 2009http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joe-cirincione/an-obama-doctrine-emerges_b_227905.html* Obama's Big Missile TestPhilip Taubman, The New York Times, July 8, 2009http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/09/opinion/09taubman.html?th&emc=th* Arms Control AmnesiaKeith B. Payne, The Wall Street Journal, July 8, 2009http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124693303362103841.html* Defending U.S. Leadership on DisarmamentJames Acton, Pierre Goldschmidt, George Perkovich, Proliferation Analysis,Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, July 7, 2009 http://www.carnegieendowment.org/publications/index.cfm?fa=view&id=23354&prog=zgp&proj=znpp* Russia Presents Test for ObamaMichael A. Fletcher and Philip P. Pan, The Washington Post, July 5, 2009http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/04/AR2009070402115.html* Obama's Youth Shaped His Nuclear-Free VisionWilliam J. Broad and David E. Sanger, The New York Times, July 4, 2009http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/05/world/05nuclear.html?th&emc=th* U.S. nuclear warheads, 1945-2009Robert S. Norris and Hans M. Kristensen, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, July/August, 2009http://thebulletin.metapress.com/content/213757w058n98374/fulltext.pdf* Our Decaying Nuclear DeterrentJon Kyl and Richard Perle, The Wall Street Journal, June 30, 2009 http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124623202363966157.html* Funding for U.S. Efforts to Improve Controls Over Nuclear Weapons, Materials, and Expertise Overseas: A 2009 UpdateAndrew Newman and Matthew Bunn, Report, Managing the Atom Project, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, June 2009http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/05/world/05nuclear.html?th&emc=thUnited KingdomRoad to 2010The Cabinet Office released the cross-department report, The Road to 2010: Addressing the nuclear question in the 21st century, with proposals to smooth the route to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Review Conference in May of 2010, highlighting in particular the importance of civil nuclear power programs. The report announced the creation of a ?20 million Nuclear Centre of Excellence in the United Kingdom that would develop proliferation-resistant nuclear technologies, a meeting of major donors to discuss the future funding and capabilities of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and recommitment to hosting a Nuclear Weapons States conference in September. For more information, also see BASIC's analysis of the Road to 2010 report.Government officials signal Trident delayLater on the same day, British officials indicated explicitly the government's intention to delay signing off on design contracts for the Trident nuclear system replacement until after the NPT Review Conference in May 2010 —a signal of the importance the U.K. government attaches to its success. This "initial gate" phase was scheduled to happen this fall. The following morning a government spokesperson said that the timetable for the project remains unchanged. Analysts speculated this was possible as the timetable had always included significant flexibility within it. The move to delay may have reflected concerns about tight defense budgets and the looming General Election.Poll shows public support waning for TridentJust before the release of the Road to 2010 report and news about a delay for Trident replacement, The Guardian published the results of its poll with ICM that showed 54% of U.K. voters were against renewing the U.K. system, and 42% were in favour. The results are in contrast to findings from two years ago that had 39% opposing and 51% in favour.Further Reading* Sense on TridentFinancial Times, July 19, 2009http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/17c3aa72-748b-11de-8ad5-00144feabdc0.html* Gordon Brown delays Trident workThe Telegraph, July 17, 2009http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/defence/5844275/Gordon-Brown-delays-Trident-work.html* Trident poll: Disarming opinionsEditorial, Comment is Free, The Guardian, July 14, 2009http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jul/14/editorial-trident-nuclear-poll* Voters want Britain to scrap all nuclear weapons, ICM poll showsJulian Glover, The Guardian, July 13, 2009http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jul/13/icm-poll-nuclear-weapons* U.K. Willing to Reduce Nuclear Arsenal, Brown SaysGlobal Security Newswire, July 10, 2009http://www.globalsecuritynewswire.org/gsn/nw_20090710_1911.php* Talks could lead to cut in UK's nuclear stockpile, says Gordon BrownPatrick Wintour, Larry Elliot and Julian Borger, The Guardian, July 9, 2009http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jul/09/britain-nuclear-stockpile-summit-obama* The Road to 2010: Addressing the nuclear question in the twenty first centuryPresented to Parliament by the Prime Minister, Cabinet Office, July, 2009http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/media/224864/roadto2010.pdf* Shared Responsibilities: A national security strategy for the UK (Executive Summary available)Ippr Commission on National Security in the 21st Century, June 30, 2009 http://www.ippr.org.uk/publicationsandreports/publication.asp?id=676* Experts urge government to reassess Trident decisionDeborah Summers, The Guardian, June 30, 2009http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jun/30/trident-nuclear-disarmamentIranUncertainty over future of P5+1 talks with IranThe continued post-election crisis in Iran has thrown the future of multilateral negotiations on Iran's nuclear program into doubt. The United States and the European Union have pledged to continue to pursue diplomatic engagement on the issue of Iran's nuclear program. Leaders at the G8 summit in L'Aquila, Italy issued a joint statement reiterating their commitment to a diplomatic solution with Iran and strongly encouraging Tehran to comply with U.N. Security Council resolutions and to cooperate with the IAEA. In an apparent reaction to the G8 focus on Iran, Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki had announced on July 13 that Tehran was preparing a political package to present to the west.On July 16, the head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization, Gholam Reza Aghazedeh, resigned. Although the reasons for the resignation are not entirely clear, Aghazedeh had been a long-time supporter of opposition candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi and former president Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad appointed Ali Akbar Salehi, former Iranian envoy to the IAEA, to be the new head of Iran's nuclear energy agency. In Salehi's first public announcement, he declared that the West needs to close the case on Iran's nuclear activity.Clinton's remarks on Iran spark Israeli concernSpeaking in Phuket, Thailand on July 22, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that if Iran pursues a nuclear weapons program, then the United States may extend a "defense umbrella" over allies in the Middle East, and said that "... it's unlikely that Iran will be any stronger or safer, because they won't be able to intimidate and dominate, as they apparently believe they can, once they have a nuclear weapon." Dan Meridor, Israel's minister of intelligence and atomic energy, reacted negatively to the comments, which he saw as suggesting that the United States has already accepted a nuclear-armed Iran. Clinton subsequently sought to dispel this notion, saying that she was simply reminding Iran that pursuing nuclear weapons would lead to a nuclear arms race in the Middle East. On July 26, Clinton warned Iranian leaders that any search for a nuclear weapon capability would be futile and that Obama's administration would not allow Iran to produce its own nuclear fuel, even under safeguards. On a visit to Tel Aviv a day later, U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates again reassured Israel that the United States was not about to compromise with Iran.Further Reading* U.S. Juggles Two Iran TimetablesGerald F. Seib, The Wall Street Journal, July 21, 2009http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124813286163066807.html* Iran's crisis has nuclear falloutMeir Javedanfar, The Guardian: Comment is Free, July 19, 2009http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jul/19/iran-nuclear-programme* Mixed Feelings: The Arabs' View of IranThe Economist, July 16, 2009http://www.economist.com/world/mideast-africa/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14045302* 10 WeeksEditorial, The New York Times, July 10, 2009http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/11/opinion/11sat3.html?_r=1&th&emc=th* How Iran Could Save the Middle EastJeffrey Goldberg, The Atlantic, July/August 2009http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200907/israel-sunni* What if Iran Got the Bomb?Robert Farley, Foreign Policy, July 7, 2009http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2009/07/07/what_if_iran_got_the_bombNorth KoreaNorth Korea launches more missiles, refuses resumption of talksIn defiance of U.N. sanctions, North Korea conducted more missile tests in early July. In response to these recent actions and the May 25th nuclear test, the U.N. Security Council expanded its sanctions against the country. New targets of sanctions include North Korea's General Bureau of Atomic Energy, trading companies, and individuals involved in the nuclear program, associated businesses and also weapons-related materials.During her visit to Thailand for the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Regional Forum on July 22, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called for a revival of the Six-Party Talks and urged ASEAN members to enforce the U.N. sanctions imposed against North Korea. Clinton said that the United States would be willing to offer North Korea a "comprehensive package" should it choose to denuclearize. She also mentioned concerns over the possibility that North Korea might be sharing nuclear technology with Myanmar (Burma). According to Japan's Kyodo News Agency, North Korea's ambassador to the United Nations, Sin Son Ho, said that Pyongyang would be willing to engage in direct dialogue with Washington, but rejected the possibility of agreeing to any package deals that would involve the resumption of North Korea's participation in the Six-Party Talks.Further Reading* North Korean Missiles Defy U.N. ResolutionEvan Ramstad, The Wall Street Journal, July 6, 2009http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124677863900195703.html?mod=googlenews_wsj* Ending North Korea's Nuclear Ambitions: The Need for Stronger Chinese ActionHui Zhang, Arms Control Today, July/August, 2009http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2009_07-08/zhang* Don't Play Nuclear Chicken with a Desperate PariahHui Zhang, Foreign Policy, June 2009http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=5020RussiaBulava missile tests fail againWhile the world was paying close attention to the Obama-Medvedev summit and the resulting commitments to a START follow-on treaty, Russia's Navy conducted successful tests of two submarine-launched Sineva-type ballistic missiles and another failed test of the new, nuclear-capable submarine-launched Bulava missile, which led to the resignation of the missile's design team leader. The Bulava missile is an upgraded design of the land-based Topol M, and is designed to both survive a nuclear attack and penetrate anti-missile defense systems. Despite 6 out of 11 launches of the Bulava ending in failure, Vice Admiral Oleg Burtsev of the Russian Navy stated, "We are committed to this missile flying." Since its commissioning in 1998, a great deal of domestic political capital has been invested in the Bulava, promoted by Mr. Putin as the new core of Russia's modernized nuclear forces.The first Borey-class strategic nuclear submarine Yury Dolgoruky, designed to carry 16 Bulavas, completed its initial sea trials with more later in the year. Two more Borey class nuclear submarines, the Alexander Nevsky and the Vladimir Monomakh, are still under construction. Russia plans to have eight by 2015.Further Reading* Russian Weapon Is in Need of RescueMichael Schwirtz, The New York Times, July 15, 2009http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/16/world/europe/16missile.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=bulava&st=cse* Analysis: US, Russia have different views on nukesRobert Burns, Associated Press, July 6, 2009http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gjji-FgUACu8zwhs2JFUzNrjpN0AD9996A700* After the Reset: A Strategy and New Agenda for U.S. Russia PolicySamuel Charap, Laura Conley, Peter Juul, Andrew Light, Julian L. Wong,Center for American Progress, July 2, 2009http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/07/after_reset.htmlIndiaU.S.-India nuclear dealDuring her mid-July visit to India, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced key agreements that will broaden cooperation between the two countries under the bilateral nuclear deal. Officials agreed on two sites for U.S. nuclear reactors. India will also purchase advanced U.S. conventional weapon systems, including fighter jets, raising concerns over the impact on the strategic balance with Pakistan.On July 26, India ran a sea trial of its first domestically-produced nuclear-powered submarine, capable of launching nuclear ballistic missiles. The submarine is due for at least two years of testing before becoming operational. India would become the sixth country, after the United States, Russia, the United Kingdom, France and China, to make nuclear-powered submarines.Further Reading* Obama jeopardizing nuclear deal with IndiaHarsh V. Pant, special to The Japan Times (editorial), July 25, 2009 http://search.japantimes.co.jp/rss/eo20090725a1.html* Toward a Nuclear Freeze in South AsiaDaryl G. Kimball, Arms Control Today, July/August, 2009http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2009_07-08/focusPakistanFrench visit to Pakistan raises expectations for nuclear cooperationThe recent July visit of French Minister for Foreign Trade, Anne Marie Idrac, had raised expectations that France was going to strike a large civilian nuclear energy deal with Pakistan. Back in May, Pakistani Foreign Minister Shah Mehmoud Qureshi, had said that France was going to agree to an arrangement like the one struck between India and the United States. However, Idrac said on July 23 during a press conference in Islamabad that France would not establish a new nuclear reactor in the country and that any aid related to nuclear energy would be for securing and enhancing the safety of Pakistan's existing nuclear sites. France did agree to provide other types of assistance, including high technology military gear and weapons, such as combat helicopters.Further Reading* The deal that wasn'tDAWN Editorial, July 25, 2009http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/news/pakistan/14-the-deal-that-wasnt-zj-01* Nuclear Security in Pakistan: Reducing the Risks of Nuclear TerrorismRolf Mowatt-Larssen, Arms Control Today, July/August, 2009http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2009_07-08/Mowatt-Larssen* Nuclear Security in Pakistan: Separating Myth From RealityFeroz Hassan Khan, Arms Control Today, July/August, 2009http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2009_07-08/khanMissile DefenseU.S. missile defense in Eastern European sites were seen to be a principal sticking point in START follow-on negotiations prior to the Obama-Medvedev summit on July 6. At the summit press conference, Obama stated, "I believe that it is entirely legitimate for our discussions to talk not only about offensive weapon systems but also defensive weapon systems." The United States plans to finish its review of European missile defense by the end of the summer. Obama and Medvedev agreed on a special Joint Statement on "Missile Defense Issues," which iterated their commitment to seek out ways of cooperation on dealing with ballistic missile proliferation. The statement also noted that experts are again discussing the establishment of the Joint Data Exchange Center (JDEC), a project which has languished since the initial Russian-American memorandum of 2000 on the Center's establishment.After the Obama-Medvedev summit, 22 intellectuals and former leaders of Central and Eastern Europe published an "open letter" to President Obama in the Polish newspaper Gazeta Wyborcza. The authors of the July 15th letter, who include Lech Walesa and Vaclav Havel, believe there remains a real threat from Russia. They assert that the project has become "a symbol of America's credibility and commitment to the region." The letter urges President Obama and NATO not to make decisions based on "unfounded Russian opposition."Further Reading* Bargaining Chip or Gas Mask: Prospects for Missile DefenseJohn Isaacs and Travis Sharp, Carnegie Council on Ethics in International Affairs, July 21, 2009 http://www.cceia.org/resources/articles_papers_reports/0023.html* An Open Letter to the Obama Administration from Central and Eastern EuropeValdas Adamkus, Martin Butora, Emil Constantinescu, Pavol Demes, Lubos Dobrovsky, Matyas Eorsi, Istvan Gyarmati, Vaclav Havel, Rastislav Kacer, Sandra Kalniete, Karel Schwarzenberh, Michal Kovac, Ivan Krastev, Alexander Kwasniewski, Mart Laar, Kadri Liik, Janos Martonyi, Janusz Onyszkiewicz, Adam Rotfeld, Vaira Vike-Freiberga, Alexandr Vondra, Lech Walesa, Gazeta Wunprcza, July 15, 2009http://wyborcza.pl/1,82049,6825987,An_Open_Letter_to_the_Obama_Administration_from_Central.html* Offense-Defense NonsensePeter Scoblic, The New Republic, July 12, 2009http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=10f6ba29-e1d4-4394-887c-9013b872abc6* Joint Statement by Dmitry A. Medvedev, President of the Russian Federation, and Barack Obama, President of the United States of America, on Missile Defense IssuesWhite House Press Office, July 6, 2009http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Joint-Statement-by-Dmitry-A-Medvedev-President-of-the-Russian-Federation-and-Barack-Obama-President-of-the-United-States-of-America-on-Missile-Defense-Issues/* Joint Statement on Missile Defense IssuesJoshua Pollack, Arms Control Wonk.com, July 6, 2009http://www.armscontrolwonk.com/2380/joint-statement-on-missile-defense-issuesAdditional Publications* Taking control of nuclearMohamed ElBaradei, The New York Times, July 19, 2009http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/jul/19/nuclear-technology-fuel-cycle* How to dismantle a nuclear bombBBC News, July 16, 2009http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8154029.stm* The long, hard road to nuclear safetyBryan Bender, The Boston Globe, July 5, 2009http://www.boston.com/news/world/europe/articles/2009/07/05/the_long_hard_road_to_nuclear_safety/?page=1* Four Emerging Issues in Arms Control, Disarmament, and Nonproliferation:Opportunities for German LeadershipDennis M. Gormley, Patricia M. Lewis, Miles A. Pomper, Lawrence Scheinman, Stephen Schwartz, Nikolai Sokov, Leonard S. Spector, report Prepared for the Policy Planning Staff, Foreign Office, Federal Republic of Germany, The James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, July 2009 http://cns.miis.edu/opapers/090717_german_leadership/german_leadership_full.pdfPlease forward this email to individuals and organizations offering them the opportunity to subscribe to BASIC's Getting to Zero Update. This will help to keep them informed about the latest developments and analysis.To subscribe or unsubscribe from this update, please visit the following page: www.basicint.org/contacts/index.php. Thank you.BASIC's work is made possible by the generous support of our donors: the Ploughshares Fund, the Ford Foundation, the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust, Polden Puckham Charitable Foundation, Rockefeller Family & Associates, and individual contributors to BASIC. We are grateful to all of them for their support.
Read more…