Lawsuits of mind control victims

Three ways for mind control victims to seek justice.

(1) One route is to appeal, which is a administrative procedure,and that is exactly a way one lawyer does not dare and does not have the energy.

Write appeal letters to government departments, senators, representatives, to urge government to investigate such horrible crime, sentence torturers according to law, and help victims.

(2) Another route is to seek public support.

With enought supporting voices from public and with evidences, government must answer our appeals.

(3) File lawsuits to sue government who do not take their responsibilities to investigae such horrible crimes, and help victims.

 

Some victims have received letters from ICC. You can write your own case to ICC, and you also can support these victims with their Ref No. A letter from ICC about "How to submitt information to ICC" are attached below.  how_to_submit_to_ICC.DOC

International Criminal Court
Head of Information & Evidence Unit
Office of The Prosecutor
Post Office Box 19519, 2500 CM The Hague, The Netherlands
Boîte postale 19519, 2500 CM La Haye, Pays Bas
Telephone / Téléphone: + 31 70 5158515 • Facsimile / Télécopie: + 31 70 5158555 • http://www.icc-cpi.int

 

John Finch

Reference: OTP-CR-70/07   EM_T08_OTP-CR-70_07_002.pdf

A letter to ICC by John Finch

https://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/hi-here-is-the-letter-i-sent-to-the-international-criminal-court


Soleilmavis (China)
Soleilmavis@yahoo.com
Ref No. EM_T01_OTP-CR-00122_07  EM_T01_OTP-CR-00122_07.pdf,  
 
James Yue Gee
james.y.gee@gmail.com
Ref No. EM_Ack_OTP-CR-742_09  EM_Ack_OTP-CR-742_09.pdf

 

Liu Wei, China

EM_T03_OTP-CR-358_12.pdf

 

European Ombudsman

1 avenue du Président Robert Schuman

CS 30403, F - 67001 Strasbourg Cedex

T. + 33 (0)3 88 17 23 13

F. + 33 (0)3 88 17 90 62

www.ombudsman.europa.eu

eo@ombudsman.europa.eu

Directorate A

Registry

Acknowledgement of receipt

for Soleilmavis’ (soleilmavis@yahoo.com ) Complaint

Registration number: 1191/2012/MF (S2012-156875)

for John Finch COMPLAINT: O497/2012/MF

 

Some lawyers suggestions on how to file a court case :
https://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/some-suggestions-on-how-to

Here are some responses and replies from Government and Public

https://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/responses-and-replies-from

Some lawsuits filed by Soleilmavis
https://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/some-lawsuits-filed-by 

David Larson's case
https://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/941b-james-walbert-mri

 

Please go to LAST PAGE OF "Replies to this Discussion" to read NEWEST Information

You need to be a member of Peacepink3 to add comments!

Join Peacepink3

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • QUESTION- Who are the Attorneys Filing lawsuits?

     Thank you 

  • How The National Security Agency (NSA) Illegally And Unconstitutionally Harasses Law-Abiding Americans Everyday. How, you ask? Quite simply, actually. It's done by EMF or ELF Radio Waves, and a technology known as "Remote Neural Monitoring". Haven't you ever wondered about that ringing in your left ear? Well, here are the reason(s). And just why should the NSA do this, you ask? To silence any who who dare to speak out against them or any other agency, or the Government or simply to think for themselves, and "outside the box", if you will. Think not? Then, read on..........

    How The NSA Harasses Thousands Of Law Abiding Americans Daily By The Usage Of Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM)
    John St. Clair Akwei
    vs.
    NSA, Ft. Meade, MD, USA

    http://www.iahf.com/nsa/20010214.html

  • I wish that I could sue my neighbor for sending microwave oven rays over into my house. She has the power to turn on my microwave, from afar, and zap us with harmful radiation! I spend my whole day sitting outside and waiting to get a glimpse of her. I've even pulled my kid from school so I can have him help me stalk her. I want to start a fight with her so bad, even though she is twice my age and size! She just ignores me. I stare at her windows, hoping that she peaks out, but she never does. I even stole her mail so I could find out more about where she goes, etc. Her ex works for law enforcement so I have to be careful! We're in the yard, and we always leave our blinds open, so we can stare at her! We even vandalized her yard a little bit, lol! I tried to get my kids to steal her UPS deliveries too, but she got them first, lol!

  • You might also search "Kyllo vs. U.S."

    http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-8508.ZO.html

    regarding another case the Supreme court ruled it unlawful for anyone to enter our homes with advanced weaponry!

    Regards to you, Margaret Mary

  • IMPORTANT - SC REINSTATED SOVEREIGNTY

    The US Supreme Court overturned a US Court appeals ruling and reinserted state Sovereignty & individual Sovereignty as well!!!

    Carol Anne Bond vs. United States, No. 09–1227, 564 U. S. ____ (June 16, 2011)


    Full document: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-1227.pdf
    http://www.truthwinds.com/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/news.php?q=1311698183
    ------------------
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuPo335Wp5Q&feature=player_embedded
  • Torjman v. Gutman, et al. USDC DC

    1:2011cv01060

     

    Dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

     

    http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/district-of-co...
  • IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS

    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

     

     

    MIREILLE TORJMAN CASE NO.: TBD

    1143 Wrightswynde Ct

    Wesley Chapel, FL 33543

     

    Plaintiff

     

    V.

     

    Amy Gutmann, Chair Bioethics Committee

    Office of President Univ of Penn

    1 College Hall Room 100

    Phila, PA 19104

    and in HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY,

     

    Carol Corillon, Committee on Human Rights

    500 Fifth Street Suite K529

    Washington, DC 20418

    and in HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY,

     

    President Harvey Fineberg, Institute of Medicine

    500 Fifth Street 8th Floor

    Washington, DC 20418

    and IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY,

     

    Diane E. Griffin Chair, National Academy of Science

    Committee Science Technology Intelligence Professionals

    500 Fifth Street DEPS 11-02 AFSB Room 905

    Washington, DC 20418

    and in HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY,

     

    Cass Sunstein Room 10201

    Office of Management and Budget

    Remote Naval Station, Bldg 40 Door 123

    250 Murray Lane SW

    Washington, DC 20509

    and in HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY;

     

    Defendants

     

    ___________________________________/

     

    COMPLAINT

     

    1. Plaintiff, Mireille Torjman hereby brings this action for the submissions of public comments pertaining to a current investigation requested by President Obama regarding Electronic Warfare and torture on civilians. Plaintiff is unable to verify or submit full evidence and proof including Science, climate, and nefarious abuse with torture, corruption, and mind manipulation during DELAYS, exceeding recent Senate and Chief Joint Staff targets, and NSA revelations worse then that of the CHURCH COMMISSION REPORTS. Related suits have been filed for injunction relief and other allegations with attempts to save lives and was also provided for reference since last year. There are 4,500 victims so far coming forward out of Millions, of wit on their mind control, thus body and systematic psyops tactics. The remaining are unwitting ALL Americans and not limited to techniques, ills, or sabotage, subsequently.

    PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

    2. This case is about the electronic harassment, torture behind the spying surveillance, civil rights violations, privacy, communications technology, and crimes of humanity, in use by the U.S. Intelligence Community, which has been refused in completion by the defendants. This information is critical to investigations, and cooperation has been impeded in numerous ways. Plaintiff has made exhausting efforts to provide assistance and save lives. New evidence with VALOR is being impeded and is time sensitive. This includes ADDITIONAL hand written notations on Doctor’s work previously published to assist fact findings of Plaintiff and discoveries since then which cannot be overlooked. Plaintiff has been impeded for 5 years in numerous ways consciously and 3 unconsciously, by the public and the uses of Synthetic Telepathy Remote Viewing Psychotronics Weapon of Mass Destruction. (Exhibits A-1-23 and A-1-16)

    

    • Operation CHAOS and PIQUE admitted and covert mind controlled crimes, illnesses population control -Directed Energy weapons Conspiracy in shadow taking us down!
      Mind Control and Directed Energy Weapons cause and are responsible for MOST ILLNESSES, INDUCED ERASURES & DELAYS IN YOUR LIFE! Misplacing your own items in trash, etc. Programmed MISFITS playing mind games since milk carton missing children recruited by coercion called Handlers.
      Secret Gov’t CointelPro has been responsible for much worse crimes and torture covertly and would never sit on this kind of power with weapons nicely tucked away, even knowing that we are not threatened by Russia and China’s Mind Control Weapons. (not launched) Sweepings with no radiation from enemies!!

    More details of the lawsuits

    http://mireilletorjman.com/lawsuit-synthetic_ills_in_america

  • Re.ICC,

    Should be:1) class action 2) if you can not locate the target, should go to Tribunal of ICC or 3) UN,tribunal 

    I will post some sample letters to lay criminal charges against those named torturers. And,I will post some sample letters to show how icc tribunal and un tribunal intervene if the involved authorities refused to look into our allegations. 

  • IN THE 9TH CURCUIT FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT

    Stephen Ahmann, }

    Guy Potter, Elisabeth Jane Buchanan et. al. } }

    Vs. } Case#_____________________________ }


    The United States }

    Comes now plaintiffs to bring action against the defendant for the following reasons including but not limited to:

    1) We, the plaintiffs, have been and/or are currently tortured by the defendant.


    2) Some plaintiffs are outside US; however, the 1991 Torture Victim Protection Act (U.S. Code (Title 28, Part IV, Chapter 85, and Section 1350)) allows for torture victims to bring action in the United States District Court.


    3) For most of us, beginning on or about 2001 we, the plaintiffs, became the victims of Cointelpro-style tactics and/or other government operations and these activities have continued up to the present. This includes tactics like organized psychological and physical operations.


    4) We are victims of Cointelpro-style tactics and/or other government psychological and physical operations. We all experience the same crimes. We live in different states and have moved to many different states all with the same result.
    The criminal activities cross state/national lines. Federal government agencies and employees participate; therefore, this falls under federal jurisdiction.


    5) Our right to petition the government for grievances has been violated as in that keeping records of the crimes against us that have occurred for a decade or more is obstructed. Our homes are frequently broken into and journals, logs, and other evidence is stolen.

     

    6) Because of the defendant(s) actions it is extremely difficult to function in society making it extremely difficult to gather and keep evidence, keep employment or business, or maintain a place to live. This violates our right to petition the government for grievances and basic rights to life and liberty.


    7)  Because the defendant’s criminal actions affects the mind and body so badly it makes it very difficult to bring lawful action. Our situation is an emergency situation. Our life, health, and well-being are always in jeopardy. It is difficult to sleep, think, work, and generally function and live.
    Therefore, all papers are filed under extreme duress. This is an emergency situation and we demand immediate relief. These activities are killing us.

     

    8) Our right to the pursuit of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness has been violated as we are nearly  perpetually stalked, harassed, intimidated, interrogated, and threatened by the defendants employing an unknown communication device set at distorted volume over an extended period of time with the intent of causing physical pain and suffering, distraction, confusion, and exhaustion. It is torture. Even while sleeping. That date of occurrence would be on or about 2001 to the present for most of us.

    9) The defendants falsely accuse of breaking laws as the reasoning behind this abuse and, even if were true, would fall under our protection against cruel and unusual punishment.


    10) The defendants, employing this high tech communication device interrogate us about private and embarrassing things like our sexual behavior and past. They demand to know all kinds of private details.
    We, also, are falsely accused of sexually perverted thoughts and brow beat. Often, the defendants tell us bizarre things like that our father/mother raped us as kids all for some psychological purpose that could include trauma based mind control. This kind of interrogation and/or verbal abuse is frequent, and for most of us has occurred from 2001 to the present.


    11) Uniformed police officers, FBI and all other government agencies that we have been in contact with participate in the Cointelpro-style activity and other physical and psychological operations... We have moved many times to different parts of the country and since this follows across state lines it, obviously, is federal, but also employs local government personnel. The tactics such as but not limited to: saying things about personal lives in public that only someone spying on us would know, gas lighting, interfering with attempts to talk with others/form relationships, interfering with normal activities such as working, sleeping, shopping, etc, street theatre, threats, intimidation, aggravated stalking, provoking, conspiracy and much more. .


    12)  Our right to petition the government for grievances has been violated. As we try to obtain the services of assistance of counsel yet all attempts made to secure counsel are blocked by cointelpro-style tactic and/or psychological operations.


    13) All forms of communication are tampered/interfered with. Including mail, email, phone calls. This has greatly interfered with our right to petition the government for grievances. As well as, untold amounts of losses.


    14) Our right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness has been violated by the defendants have used the unknown communication device to employ a hypnotist and/or some other kind of weapon(s ) to influence us. We are then made to see, believe, and forget all kinds of things over the years. Some of the things we have been hypnotized/manipulated to experience include but are not limited to: feel paranoia; believe our thoughts were being read; to fall asleep while at work, grocery shopping, and interfere with my attempts to perform necessary duties and much more. We have also felt excruciating chest pains, pain in other areas, painful dizzy spells, and a feeling of suffocation or throat closing. All of this was upon command from the defendants letting us know it was them that had the power to give us chest pains, dizzy spells, etc. while they laughed at our situation. These assaults and others like them occur multiple times per hour.


    15) Our freedom of religion has been violated as the defendants used the unknown communication device to hurt us whenever we tried to practice our religion. We have been threatened about our religion, politics, and a host of other beliefs and informed by the defendants that we had to do what they wanted or they would increase their criminal activities.


    16) Our freedom of speech has been violated by parties unknown to us as we are punished for saying or doing certain things by the defendant’s increased criminal actives and their threats to do so. This includes threats of prosecution…most recently 6-3-2011 for preparing this suit.
    I, Stephen Ahmann, was informed through an unknown communication device at about 11:00 pm that if I don’t drop this suit that the defendants would have people testify against me for made-up crimes. This is vindictive prosecution and is illegal. Threats like this have been made to me countless times over the years.


    17)  We are threatened often, making us fearful and unable to pursue life liberty or happiness.
    Some of the threats we have received include but are not limited to: threats to kill us, poisoning us, arresting us and holding in jail forever, stealing our possessions, gang-beating us up with baseball bats, shooting us, raping us, putting cameras in our home and putting compromising pictures of us on the internet, conspiring to defraud us by broadcasting this abuse and profiting from it, paying opposite sex not to sleep with us, prosecute us civilly and/or criminally, paying people to harass us, running us out of the country, conspiring to continue to stalk, harass and threaten us and never stop.


    18)  Most of us have had numerous cars and other vehicles swerve, obviously pointed right at us, in attempt to intimidate us. Many of us have been beat up and hospitalized many times. Some have had entire gangs jump us and been hospitalized. Since this was quite rare or never happened prior to this start date on or about 2001, these events coincide with the start of all the other operations and are perpetrated by the defendant.


    19)  Almost all of us are victims of slander and libel, another aspect of Cointelpro-style tactics, and/or government psychological and physical operations, to isolate us to make sure no one knows or helps us.


    20)  We are victims of the crime of provoking and conspiracy to provoke. This is perpetrated by the defendant and started for the majority of plaintiffs on or around 2001 to the present.


    21) Those of us with children, and pets, or elderly family have had to watch as the defendants inflicted the same tortures on them.


    Damages
    Actual damages:

    a.) time off work 10 years time/lost wages and income @ 100,000 per year per plaintiff is 1,000,000 USD


    b.) Hospitalization  30,000 per plaintiff average over 10 year period


    c.)  Court costs

     

    II. Pain and suffering


    a.) physical pain suffered from torture for a ten year period is 10 billion USD per plaintiff


    b.) isolation due to libel /slander campaign for 10 years is 10 billion USD per plaintiff

     

    III. Punitive damages is 20.1 billion dollars per plaintiff


    Total damages are 40.2 billion dollars per plaintiff.


    So Stated under penalty of perjury on this ______________ day of ____________, 20__ _____________________________ ____________

    _____________________________ ____________

    _____________________________ _____________

    ______________________________ ____________

  • Canada class action lawuits

    Lawsuits

    January 10, 2007

     

    Montreal woman seeks class-action approval over brainwashing experiments

    MONTREAL (CP) - Patients were put in isolation, tied down or drugged, and subjected to hours and hours of taped recordings meant to brainwash them.

    They were subjected to massive electroshocks, experimental drugs and LSD, all at the behest of the CIA, a federal court was told on Wednesday. Now it's time for the federal government to compensate the hundreds of victims whose lives were damaged, argued lawyer Alan Stein.

    Stein is seeking court approval for a class-action lawsuit on behalf of his client, Janine Huard, one of the hundreds of patients of Dr. Ewen Cameron to be subjected to the CIA experiments going back to the 1950s.

    "Madame Huard was not only subject to electroshock treatments, to experimental drugs, to psychic driving, the government of Canada has refused her compensation, " Stein told the court.

    "She never knew that she was being subjected to these experiments or that she was being used by Dr. Cameron and his staff as a guinea pig."

    Cameron pioneered "psychic driving," by which he believed he could erase the memories of patients and rebuild their psyches without psychiatric defect.

    The idea intrigued the CIA, which recruited Cameron to experiment with mind control techniques beginning in 1950. The McGill experiments were jointly funded by the CIA and the Canadian government.

    The experiments were part of a larger CIA program called MK-ULTRA, which also saw LSD administered to U.S. prison inmates and patrons of brothels without their knowledge, according to testimony before a 1977 U.S. Senate committee.

    The CIA eventually settled a class-action lawsuit by test subjects, including Huard, and the Canadian government ordered a judicial report into Cameron's experiments.

    Lawyers for the federal government argue it's too late to proceed with a lawsuit, more than four decades after Cameron's death and more than a decade after the claims were rejected.

    Huard, who will be 79 at the end of the month, was a patient of Cameron at McGill University's Allan Memorial Institute for more than a decade, beginning in 1951.

    She was one of nine Canadian victims who received nearly US$67,000 from the CIA in 1988 to compensate her for her suffering.

    But her claim for compensation from the federal government, which jointly funded the experiments, was rejected three times.

    In 1994, 77 patients were awarded $100,000 each from the federal government but only those who suffered "total depatterning, " meaning they were rendered to childlike state.

    More than 250 others were denied compensation because their treatment was less intense and had fewer long-term effects.

    Then, in 2004, a federal appeal court overruled that decision and awarded a former patient the $100,000.

    That decision prompted Huard's lawsuit.

    Julius Grey, another of Huard's lawyers, said Huard suffered permanent consequences from the experiments.

    She never abandoned the idea of seeking justice for what happened to her, her lawyers told the court, she simply didn't have the money to pursue legal action.

    "It's unbelievable that this took place," Stein told the court.

This reply was deleted.