http://www.facebook.com/notes/suz-leboeuf/statements-to-the-bioethics-committee-from-lucy-wwwcointelprotodayorg/10150206837381594

;

http://www.facebook.com/notes/suz-leboeuf/statements-to-the-bioethics-committee-from-lucy-wwwcointelprotodayorg/10150206837381594

File No. A/C.3/64/L.23/Rev.1

Up till now, if we are not very sure about how to deal with cases of torture. Please refer to :
The Torture Reporting Handbook. How to document and respond to allegations of torture within the international system for the protection of human rights. 

http://www.hrea.org/index.php?base_id=104&language_id=1&erc_doc_id=269&category_id=9&category_type=3&group=

The Blackfile Summary Report will provide a historical accounting reaching back to WWI and forward into the present moment. It will reveal that both specific and randomly targeted individuals having been sanctioned as involuntary human test animals since the second leg of the CIA MK-ULTRA Program. The continued testing and development of Direct Energy Weapons [DEW] aka Enhanced Radiation Weapons [ERW] employing weaponized electromagnetic pulse radiation and other energy frequencies against innocent American and Canadian citizens.

http://www.examiner.com/human-rights-in-national/ex-fbi-agent-gangstalking-term-self-harm-for-no-touch-torture-eugenics#ixzz1G6csn635

Canada needs clear policy on torture

http://www.ndp.ca/press/canada -needs-clear-policy-on-torture

Statement by the Government of Canada on torture

http://www.pch.gc.ca/ddp-hrd/d ocs/cat/104-eng.cfm

The Scarborough Hospital and CEO:
You conducted mental status exam in my home without my "informed consent" after I reported to the police regarding the first gang stalker, my neighbor . ( You didn’t tell me anything before your visit) After that, you destroyed the most important part of my medical record. You falsified. and fabricated my medical record. You induced my family doctor to change his mind with your falsified medical report. You denied my request for the access to my entire medical record, especially handwritten notes and voice recording of that MSE conducted by a nurse. Torturers, look at your ownevidence. Torturers, look at my previous response to your statement. 

(4) The person seeking to introduce an electronic record has the burden of proving its authenticity by evidence capable of supporting a finding that the electronic record is what the person claims it to be
----Evidence Act of Ontario
(5) Subject to subsection (6), where the best evidence rule is applicable in respect of an electronic record, it is satisfied on proof of the integrity of the electronic record.
----Evidence Act of Ontario
Hospital records must be kept for the greater of 10 years from the date of the last visit.
---- Public Hospitals Act
When paper records are scanned to electronic form, the original paper records may be destroyed.
----CPSO

The whole case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCo-5V1vJAo

This is the beginning of a victory, which belongs to International Criminal Court, International Human Rights Groups and the people all over the world. It tells us ,hundreds of thousands of kind and honest people, the world can be better without torture if we can work and stand together.

Again, this is not for being against any governments or politicians. But, perps, murderers, torturers, “you have nowhere to run and nowhere to go.”

Both links must be viewed. 

http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/Canada/20110622/detainee-documents-110622/

http://presscore.ca/2011/?p=1167

Terribly sorry to hear what you have been through.

Enough have been said on the evidence, the ways perps torture us, related books....What we really need is public inquiry into our cases. Class action lawsuits? No. Not now. In addition, whom will class action lawsuits lay charge against? The governments? It is too too.... hard. But, a public inquiry is not too too hard though. Pls watch my video on youtube. In the evidence list, you can find out how Mr. Attorney General of Canada, AI, Redress, Human Rights Watch dealt with torture cases. In addition, you can find some famous lawyers' statements regarding the process of dealing with torture cases. I posted it in here several days ago.

Let's go for a public inquiry.

Best,

Robin

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCo-5V1vJAo; or

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B1zds2vthGgXMTFiZGVhNzAtNzgxNy00MjZjLTg3MDAtNDllZGM4MWJmODFj&hl=en

; or

http://www.amnesty.org.uk/uploads/documents/doc_20726.pdf

Famous lawyers' statements:

http://presscore.ca/2011/?p=1167

With the government refusing to start a public inquiry and the International Criminal Court having launched a “preliminary” investigation into the Afghan detainee issue, law experts say there is a very real chance Canadian officials could be charged with war crimes.

“International law is very clear,” said Mr. Dosanjh, a lawyer and former attorney general of British Columbia. “You need circumstantial evidence; you don’t need actual knowledge of any specific allegations, or actual knowledge of torture. There was substantial knowledge of torture in Afghan jails. Every kid on the ground knew that. All of the reports, national or international, knew that.”

University of Ottawa law professor Errol Mendes says Mr. Dosanjh was correct. The government’s oft-repeated line that there was no documented physical evidence of torture of Canadian-transferred detainees is a “detour,” he said, which ignores the actual requirements of the law: circumstantial evidence that a risk of torture existed.

The Istanbul Protocol is the first set of internationally recognised guidelines for medical and legal experts on how to determine whether a person has been tortured and how to establish independent valid evidence that can be used in court against alleged torturers. Since its inception the Protocol has become a crucial instrument in the global effort to eradicate torture.
One of the main obstacles in the struggle against torture is insufficient evidence in cases against alleged perpetrators. Most cases do not lead to justice for the torture survivor because the scars on his or her body and mind have not been appropriately documented by doctors or used by lawyers in legal proceedings. Torturers are rarely held responsible for their crimes.
Manual on the Effective Investigation and Documentation of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, known as the Istanbul Protocol. The Protocol outlines detailed, practical procedures for medical and legal experts on how to identify and document symptoms of torture in such a way that the findings can be used as evidence in court cases against torturers.
In response to this problem, 75 experts from 40 organisations in 15 countries developed the The Istanbul Protocol enables medical experts to:

Gather relevant, accurate, and reliable evidence on torture allegations

Reach conclusions on the consistency and the degree of support between the torture allegations and the medical findings

Produce high-quality medical reports for submission to judicial and administrative bodies
The Istanbul Protocol enables legal experts to:

Obtain relevant, accurate, and reliable statements from torture victims and witnesses

Recover and preserve evidence related to the alleged torture which will aid in the prosecution of those responsible

Determine how, when and where the alleged incidents of torture occurred
For nearly a decade, the IRCT has been working to promote states’ endorsement and implementation of the Protocol. More information can be found at www.preventingtorture.orgFor org or by writing to Susanne Kjær at sk@irct.org.
The International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims (IRCT) is an independent, international health professional organisation that promotes and supports the rehabilitation of torture victims and works for the prevention of torture worldwide. Based in Denmark, the IRCT works in collaboration with a global network of more than 140 torture rehabilitation centres and programmes worldwide. The IRCT also works in partnership with governments, human rights organisations, health professional organisations and intergovernmental organisations.
The International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims (IRCT)
Borgergade 13 • P.O. Box 9049 • DK-1022 Copenhagen K • Denmark
Tel: +45 33 76 06 00 • Fax: +45 33 76 05 00 • E-mail: irct@irct.org

Dear Gerry,
 
Thank you very much.

I forward two letters from Mr. Attorney General of Canada for your reference when looking for some lawyers.
In addition, regarind my case, please go to :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCo-5V1vJAo
 
Pls think about it before making any significant decisions. " A public inquiry/or class action lawsuits"? (I posted it on peacepink.ning.com and facebook.) 
Now, please use some other types of communication as your back up, like facebook.
I believe we can do it as well as Americans.
 
Thank you again.
Robin

Before I post this, I must state that this is not against mentioned individuals.But,it is the reference for victims. 
 

With the government refusing to start a public inquiry and the International Criminal Court having launched a “preliminary” investigation into the Afghan detainee issue, law experts say there is a very real chance Canadian officials could be charged with war crimes.

“International law is very clear,” said Mr. Dosanjh, a lawyer and former attorney general of British Columbia. “You need circumstantial evidence; you don’t need actual knowledge of any specific allegations, or actual knowledge of torture. There was substantial knowledge of torture in Afghan jails. Every kid on the ground knew that. All of the reports, national or international, knew that.”

University of Ottawa law professor Errol Mendes says Mr. Dosanjh was correct. The government’s oft-repeated line that there was no documented physical evidence of torture of Canadian-transferred detainees is a “detour,” he said, which ignores the actual requirements of the law: circumstantial evidence that a risk of torture existed.

http://presscore.ca/2011/?p=1167

http://vimeo.com/24454232

Who are the perpetrators? 

By definition, torture is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity .Those most likely to be involved in torture include persons such as:
 

• prison officers/detention staff
• the police
• the military
• paramilitary forces
• state-controlled contra-guerilla forces

But perpetrators may also include:
 

• health professionals
• legal professionals
• co-detainees acting with the approval or on the orders of public officials
• death squads

In the context of armed conflicts, torture and other forms of ill-treatment could also be inflicted by:
 

• opposition forces
• the general population (in a civil war situation)

http://www.irct.org/what-is-torture/defining-torture.aspx

http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/FacebookLive

We must understand " Torture", " Crimes Against Humanity" defined by UN and ICC. So, we can move on.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_against_humanity

International Criminal Court

In 2002, the International Criminal Court (ICC) was established in The Hague (Netherlands) and the Rome Statute provides for the ICC to have jurisdiction over genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. The definition of what is a "crime against humanity" for ICC proceedings has significantly broadened from its original legal definition or that used by the UN,^[16] and Article 7 of the treaty stated that:

For the purpose of this Statute, "crime against humanity" means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack:^[17]

(a) Murder;

(b) Extermination;

(c) Enslavement;

(d) Deportation or forcible transfer of population;

(e) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law;

(f) Torture;

(g) Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity;

(h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court;

(i) Enforced disappearance of persons;

(j) The crime of apartheid;

(k) Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.