Blogs

Interactive Computation at BioInfoMicro Interface

Goals:

If "invent by increment" :Today’s digital microelectronic computer: Si-based, 0.18

Two examples:

•

•

Coupling of Brain to Micro/Optoelectronic Chips: Interactive Computation at BioInfoMicroBioInfoMicro Interface

as a massively parallel, spatially distributed analog computer large-scale non-silicon based interactive, monolithic transducer/receiver arrays

• 6 faculty, 2-3 senior staff, 10-12 Ph.D. students (joint advising)

• Institute for Brain Science, Laboratory of Engineering and Man Made Systems, Center for Advanced Materials Research

• Central Research Facilities

Coupling of Brain to Micro/Optoelectronic Chips: Interactive Computation at BioInfoMicroBioInfoMicro Interface

Year 1:

·Demonstration of electrical recording from cortex slices by carbon nanotube electrodes ·Real time imaging of cortex slices by fluorescence optical probes based on compact semiconductor micro-optical light emitters/detectors ·Development of signal acquisition and information processing strategies for the manmade arrays

Year 2:

·Fabrication of carbon nanotube arrays and initial studies of synaptic correlations with these novel nanoprobes ·Fabrication of high density arrays of blue/green/UV LEDs and photodiodes and development of prototype high

spatiotemporal resolution imaging of cortical activity ·Studies of neuronal activity by the nanoelectronic/microphotonic arrays ·Development of information theories of spatially distributed computing

Year 3:

·Demonstration of carbon nanotube arrays as spatially distributed, interactive sensors/transducers of cerebral cortex; proof of concept experiments in spatially distributed computation. ·Demonstration of microphotonic arrays as spatially distributed, interactive sensors/transducers of cerebral cortex; proof of concept experiments in spatially distributed computation. ·Connecting the theory concepts of spatially distributed computing with initial input from experiments

Year 4:

·Integration of nanoelectronic and microphotonic sensor/transducer arrays ·Incorporation of results from theoretical models to guide the experimental system design

Year 5:

·Demonstration of a proof-of-concept computational device at the Bio/Info/Micro interface with integration of cerebral cortex and nanoelectronics/microphotonics

impulse inserter

Chronic intracortical multi-electrode array(University of Utah; Bionics Technologies, Inc)

(Donoghue, Hatsopoulos et al) Simultaneously RecordedExtracellular Action Potentials(Mean/Standard Deviation)

Decoding of Discrete and Continuous Movements of the Arm Movements to Visual Targets

Y position (cm)

9 10111213141516

X position (cm)

microelectrode

thalamocortical slice ^{fast spiking in the recording chamber interneuron (excitatory)}

The activated, synchronized LTS network generates stronginhibitory potentials in other neurons in the local circuit (top);inhibition is itself synchronized across the circuit (bottom).

+ACPD

_LTS

_0.0

_{20 2 mV FS -0.6 250 ms LTS vs FS}

_{-400 -200 ^{0 200 400}}

_d

_{RS R S 1 mV 0.6}

_0.0

_{Cross-correlation Cross-corr}

_•

_{Neuronal Probing and Probe Design using Carbon Nanotubes Arrays}

_{(J. Xu et al)}

_{Probe Design: Two Approaches}

_{System Design: The Probe at the Bio/Nanoelectro Interphase}

_Goal

_{interactions in context of parallel processing}

_{blue/NUV compact semiconductorlight emitters (LEDs, diode lasers)}

_{LED/laser and photodiode arrays:}

_{• High spatial resolution (<10ì m)}

_{• High speed (<<msec real time)}

_{• Large area arrays (>mm²}

_{• monolithic integration of ultracompact microphotonic transducer/receiver arrays}

_{(b) Optical probing of neuronal circuits}

_{• voltage sensitive dyes}

_{• Ca²⁺}

_{(a) Imaging of action potentials of single neurons}

_{(c) Photostimulation of neuronal activity (e.g. photolysis of caged glutamate)}

_{S. Antic et al J. Neurophys. 82, 1615 (1999): vertebrate neurons in brain slices}

_{need of compact NUV/deep blue light sources}

_{Next Generation of Blue LED Arrays for Cortical Imaging}

_{• 10 ì m individual device diameter, 50 ì m spacing, ~ 1.5 mm}

₂

_{LED array layout}

_{• 32x32 element individually matrix addressable array (1024 LEDs)}

_{Coupling of Brain to Micro/Optoelectronic Chips: Interactive Computation at BioInfoMicroBioInfoMicro Interface}

_{Anderson, Kimia}

_{Technical Example: Computation with Massive Parallelism: The Nervous System and NanostructuresNanostructures}

_{Present Status and Issue:}

_{Objective: Modeling Neuronal Activity and Spatial Computation while developing needed theoretical support to the analysis and understanding of experimental input provided by the new sensor/transducer nanoarrays}

_{Notes (general):}

_{Traditional computers do not compute what we do: Different hardware leads to different engineering solutions.}

_{• Computers are good at: Excel spreadsheets, bank balances, boring detail (trees)}

_{• Human-like computers are good at: intuition, association, plausible inference (forests).}

_{Nanostructures or any brain-like computational architecture will build "human like" computers.}

_{One current approach to "cognitive computation" uses properties of dynamical systems with attractors as a way to do computation.}

_{• Neurons (single units) are not the elementary unit of neural computation but groups of neurons are.}

_{• Small attractor networks are the basic functional units}

_{(single units are only of interest in as they give rise to the distributed activity patterns in the attractor networks)}

_{• Attractor networks connect and states in one network "interference patterns" formed when patterns collide become key information processing elements. They are formed from combinations of lower level features}

_{^{for vision that relies on}}

_{^{• Wave Propagation (Eikonal Equation) spatial relationships among edge}}

_{^{• Interference Patterns or Shock Waves elements}}

_{^{• Transformation of these patterns}}

_{^{• Detection of optimal paths of transformation}}

_{^{The need to organize "geometrically" related structure is not unique to vision, but also}}

_{^{applies to other domains such}}

_{^{as touch and sound, as well as}}

_{^{motor maps.}}

_•

_•

_•

_{or parabolic PDE}

_Goals

_•

_•

_{- evidence of interference pattern}

_{- shock wave propagation}

_{- role of scale}

_•

_{- account for propagation velocity variations}

_{- dependence on local context}

_{- region based segmentation}

_•

_{Coupling of Brain to Micro/Optoelectronic Chips:}

(1) Aim at discovery and implementation of new computational paradigms acquired from interaction of a biological processor (brain) and man-made nanoscale device arrays, with emphasis on collective phenomena.

(2) Develop next generation of interactive, "smart" nanoprobe-based sensor array technology with ultra- high spatio/temporal resolution for a broad range of neuroscience imaging applications.

(3) Develop new theoretical approaches that bridge neuroscience and computer engineering, with emphasis on spatially distributed computing

http://www.wanttoknow.info/bluebird10pg

buenas tardes,

hace aproximadamente 2 meses y a raíz de un tema de corrupción política inicié unas "investigaciones" sobre los políticos implicados y de ahí descubrí poco  a poco todas las mentiras a nivel mundial; la cuestión es que sin darme cuenta unas búsquedas me llevaron a otras y pronto descubrí el fenómeno chemtrail y otras cosas más que sacadas de contexto pueden sonar a locura y que no voy a explicar.

El caso es que todo lo que sé lo he difundido todo lo que he podido y más.  

Tengo sueños muy intensos sobre gente que interacciona conmigo en los sueños,  que me pregunta cosas, siempre son personas que generan en mi la obligación de contestar, me generan un sentimiento de miedo y presión,  me despierto sobre las 3 de la noche muy exaltada porque sé que alguien me está analizando en los sueños y me da la sensación de que he recibido una cantidad de información aunque nunca recuerdo cual y la que recuerdo no sirve para nada. Cuando ocurre esto me duele mucho la nuca y en general la parte trasera de la cabeza, y la migraña suele durar todo el día, me encuentro como si alguien me hubiera machacado el cerebro o como si hubiera estado muy concentrada y paso el día medio adormilada. Ayer fue la última vez que me sucedió, no sé porqué me pasa ni si es control mental pero a mi me dió esa sensación incluso antes de saber que el control mental existía, de hecho yo llegué  a las búsquedas de control mental a raíz de mi primera experiencia de control mental y me sorprendí cuando encontré tanta información.

Tengo miedo, nunca me había ni planteado que esto me pudiese pasar, sé que es en parte porque estoy haciendo cosas que no debería, pero el control mental empezó hace un par de semanas de forma bastante suave y ha ido en aumento el sentimiento de tortura, he llegado a ver (en el sueño) un ser más fuerte que yo de ojos amarillos gritándome con un sonido que incluia una vibración y sé que era otra forma de comunicarse que no eran idiomas , la sensación era como escuchar "durum durum durum...".

¿A alguien le ha pasado?

The severity of torture involved in a lot of the CIA’s projects has lent Project Monarch something of an air of lunacy. Survivors of any kind are often not believed when they talk about their abuse, and this may be particularly true of survivors whose abuse included their government, specific political figures, the creation of many people inside their bodies, elaborate programming, and extreme and horrific physical, sexual, and mental abuse. On top of that, ritual abuse survivors – including governmental ritual abuse – are often set up to sound like their memories can’t possibly be true

Physical identification characteristics on victims/survivors often include
multiple electrical prod scars and/or resultant moles on their skin. A few may
have had various parts of their bodies mutilated by knives, branding irons, or
needles, Butterfly or occult tattoos are also common. Generally, bloodliners are
less likely to have the subsequent markings, as their skin is to remain pure and
unblemished.

http://information4sale.blogspot.com/2011/01/project-monarch-nazi-mind-control.html?spref=tw

The Blackfile Summary Report will provide a historical accounting reaching back to WWI and forward into the present moment. It will reveal that both specific and randomly targeted individuals having been sanctioned as involuntary human test animals since the second leg of the CIA MK-ULTRA Program. The continued testing and development of Direct Energy Weapons [DEW] aka Enhanced Radiation Weapons [ERW] employing weaponized electromagnetic pulse radiation and other energy frequencies against innocent American and Canadian citizens.

http://www.examiner.com/human-rights-in-national/ex-fbi-agent-gangstalking-term-self-harm-for-no-touch-torture-eugenics#ixzz1G6csn635

Maybe this could be for some help shielding...

http://www.laserscenarfusion.com/products/solaris-blanket.php

http://21centurymedicinechest.com/solaris_blanket/

Canada needs clear policy on torture

http://www.ndp.ca/press/canada -needs-clear-policy-on-torture

Statement by the Government of Canada on torture

http://www.pch.gc.ca/ddp-hrd/d ocs/cat/104-eng.cfm

The Scarborough Hospital and CEO:
You conducted mental status exam in my home without my "informed consent" after I reported to the police regarding the first gang stalker, my neighbor . ( You didn’t tell me anything before your visit) After that, you destroyed the most important part of my medical record. You falsified. and fabricated my medical record. You induced my family doctor to change his mind with your falsified medical report. You denied my request for the access to my entire medical record, especially handwritten notes and voice recording of that MSE conducted by a nurse. Torturers, look at your ownevidence. Torturers, look at my previous response to your statement. 

(4) The person seeking to introduce an electronic record has the burden of proving its authenticity by evidence capable of supporting a finding that the electronic record is what the person claims it to be
----Evidence Act of Ontario
(5) Subject to subsection (6), where the best evidence rule is applicable in respect of an electronic record, it is satisfied on proof of the integrity of the electronic record.
----Evidence Act of Ontario
Hospital records must be kept for the greater of 10 years from the date of the last visit.
---- Public Hospitals Act
When paper records are scanned to electronic form, the original paper records may be destroyed.
----CPSO

The whole case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCo-5V1vJAo