All Posts (12217)

Sort by

TARGETED EVIDENCE

https://www.targetedamerica.com/targeted-evidence.html

TARGETED EVIDENCE

(affiliated website)​

ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE, CREDIBLE PUBLICATIONS

REPUTABLE MDs AND PhDs, GOVERNMENT SOURCES
 

 

 These links will take you directly to our affiliated site, TargetedEvidence.com. Overviews of the topics and link are available below as well.​​

Targeting Exists

Targeting is a phenomenon of a somewhat organized group of people harassing, abusing and targeting another class of innocent people. The targeted people are called “Illegally Targeted People.” Finally the Illegal Targeted Community in March of 2019 has evidence of the existence of “targeting.” This is according to the United States House of Representatives, the ACLU, and many other reputable sources. Several sources, including the ACLU, said that this class of people were “targeted.” Further, Congressman and Congresswoman called them “Targeted Individuals.”

Go to Targeting Exists page at our affiliated site, TargetedEvidence.com

Organized Stalking

Organized Stalking is carried out by a group of people that work together to stalk, harass, injure, isolate, impoverish, and mentally attack victims with the intention of shattering their life. This crime is distinct from other crimes in that there is generally no motive except for viciousness itself or a as a paid organized criminal. The methods used to carry out the abuses are surreptitious in nature and usually carried out in plain sight. Often modern technology is utilized sometimes even with support from rogue and scandalous perverted law enforcement.

The end result is torture and attracts the most vile class of people. The target is a plaything to their attempted controller using wireless devices in carrying out the physical and mental abuses. Organized stalking is worldwide and is also called contract stalking or gang stalking. The electronic harassment that accompanies organized stalking is also known as covert harassment and the stalker sometimes uses remote assault and battery in their reprehensible crimes. Many organized stalkers have successfully destroyed their targets, called Illegally Targeted People, putting the target in isolation from family and friends, financial ruin, and utter chaos.

But finally now this predatory abnormal and abhorrent behavior is being exposed through legal action, public speaking, and public awareness.

Go to Organized Stalking at our affiliated site, TargetedEvidence.com

​Directed Energy Weapons

Directed-Energy Weapons (DEW) are ranged weapons that effect its target with highly focused energy, including laser microwaves and particle beams. These military type weapons are now illegally targeting people with electromagnetic frequencies.
 
Both microwave heating and microwave hearing weapons can be used on people and the unknowing person would be confused by the bioeffects. These dangerous elf/ulf/vlf/rf frequency waves permeate the bodily tissues causing serious degradation of the health. Electronic warfare is defined as any military action involving the use of electromagnetic and directed energy to control the electromagnetic spectrum to attack the enemy. The Navy calls this “electromagnetic battle management.” But now these weapons are being used in organized crimes against Illegally Targeted People.

Go to Directed Energy Weapons ​at our affiliated site, TargetedEvidence.com

Voice to Skull (V2K)

Voice to Skull (V2k) is a phenomenon to project auditory effects or voices into a person’s head, bypassing the ears. This electromagnetic radiation, including the microwave auditory effect, uses frequencies and surveillance techniques to transmit sounds and thoughts into people's heads, affect people's bodies, and harass people.

Go to Voice to Skull (V2K) ​at our affiliated site, TargetedEvidence.com

​Remote Neural Monitoring

Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM), as the name suggests, is a technology that can be used to remotely monitor neural activity of a host. With RNM, not only is it possible to violate the privacy of the Illegally Targeted Person, but it is possible to read and manipulate a person’s emotional thought processes along with the subconscious and dreams.
 
Research studies have shown that the human brain thinks at a rate of about 5000 bits per second and does not have the capacity to compete with supercomputers performing via satellites, implants and biotelemetry. At present, it is reported that, around the world, supercomputers are monitoring millions of people simultaneously with the speed of 20 billion bits per second especially in countries like USA, Japan, Israel and many European countries. Government have justified this technology as cutting edge under the objective to detect any criminal thought taking place inside the mind of possible culprits.
 
But the reality is that this is a violation of the United States Constitution’s Fifth amendment, “Witness Against Himself.” Remote Neural Monitoring is a violation of basic human rights because it violates privacy and the dignity of thoughts and activities of life.

​Go to Remote Neural Monitoring ​at our affiliated site, TargetedEvidence.com

​Illegal Mind Experiments

The United States has a verifiable record of illegal intelligence agency abuses including mind control experiments. This was revealed in the United States Congress’ Church Committee Hearing named after Senator Frank Church. After holding 126 full committee meetings, 40 subcommittee hearings, interviewing some 800 witnesses in public and closed sessions, and combing through 110,000 documents, the committee published its final report on April 29, 1976 determining “intelligence excesses, at home and abroad.”
 
The final report concluded “Intelligence agencies have undermined the constitutional rights of citizens,” primarily “because checks and balances designed by the framers of the Constitution to assure accountability have not been applied.”
 
One of those illegal programs was MK-Ultra, a top-secret CIA project, in which the agency conducted hundreds of clandestine experiments—sometimes on unwitting U.S. citizens—to assess the potential use of LSD and other drugs for mind control, information gathering and psychological torture.
 
The experiments, which are actually federal crimes, continue to the present day, but are in the process of being exposed.

​Go to Illegal Mind Experiments ​at our affiliated site, TargetedEvidence.com

​Threats to Silence People

This deserves a category all by itself because this is how the United States government is able to implement the targeting program into families and communities. It has widely been reported by the United States agency Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Whistleblower Decorated Specialist Kevin Shipp that CIA intimidates and silences whistleblowers, witnesses, families, and the American people, that speak about government abuse, and will even claim the whistleblower or person that speaks out is having psychological problems.

Go to Threats to Silence People ​at our affiliated site, TargetedEvidence.com

​Illegal Surveillance

Illegal surveillance is being used on all of the American people so this just makes the Illegal Targeted Program easier to implement by federal agencies and law enforcement Several whistleblowers have come forward so far including Edward Snowden, William Binney, Kirk Wiebe, and Karen Stewart. In fact, National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower William Binney has publicly said “When you marry the intelligence agencies – the secret intelligence agencies - with the police – which is what they’re doing, you end up with a police state and a secret police and that’s exactly what we got.”

Go to Illegal Surveillance ​at our affiliated site, TargetedEvidence.com

​COINTELPRO and FBI Discrediting

COINTELPRO, short for Counterintelligence Program, was a counterintelligence program conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) from 1956 to 1971 to discredit and neutralize organizations the United States government targeted by infiltrating the organization to discredit them. It was covert and often used extralegal means to criminalize various forms of political struggle and derail several social movements, such as those for civil rights.

The COINTELPRO operations included intense surveillance, organizational infiltration, anonymous mailings, and police harassment. The entire Illegally Targeted Community is currently researching and searching for similar programs.

Go to COINTELPRO and FBI Discrediting ​at our affiliated site, TargetedEvidence.com

 

Read more…

GOVERNMENT MASS SURVEILLANCE PROJECTS

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_government_mass_surveillance_projects

Wikipedia

LIST OF GOVERNMENT MASS SURVEILLANCE PROJECTS

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Part of a series on Mass Surveillance

This is a list of government mass surveillance projects and related databases throughout the world.

International

Snapshot of Boundless Informant's global map of data collection

European Union

  • Data Retention Directive: A directive requiring EU member states to store citizens' telecommunications data for six to 24 months and allowing police and security agencies to request access from a court to details such as IP address and time of use of every email, phone call, and text message sent or received.
  • INDECT: Research project funded by the European Union to develop surveillance methods (e.g. processing of CCTV camera data streams) for the monitoring of abnormal behaviours in an urban environment.[1]
  • Schengen Information System: A database kept for national security and law enforcement purposes.

France

220px-EMERAUDE_-_Domme.jpgDGSE base near Domme in southwestern France

Germany

India

National

Australia

Main article: Mass surveillance in Australia

  • In August 2014 it was reported[2] that law-enforcement agencies had been accessing Australians' web browsing histories via internet providers such as Telstra without a warrant.
  • It was reported[3] that Australia had issued 75% more wiretap warrants in 2003 than the US did and this was 26 times greater than the US on a per capita basis.

United Kingdom

Further information: Mass surveillance in the United Kingdom

United States

Further information: Mass surveillance in the United States

Unclear origin

Recently discontinued

See also

 

Read more…

TARGETING TARGETED INDIVIDUALS

https://www.fwweekly.com/2021/01/20/targeting-targeted-individuals/

FORTWORTH WEEKLY

 Home News Feature Targeting Targeted Individuals

Targeting Targeted Individuals

Some Fort Worthians believe they’re under secret attack by the government, and there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

By TERI WEBSTER

January 20, 2021

“All we can do, Scully, is pull the thread, see what unravels.” — Fox Mulder, The X-Files

 Far on the outer fringes of Fort Worth are people who believe they’re being zapped by military satellites with deadly microwave beams. Cellphone towers and “super computers” are used to stream hateful messages into their subconscious minds, 24/7. These methods and more are part of a vast plot to exert mind control over and torture the entire population, these folks claim.

According to the self-proclaimed victims, they are followed in public by street actors and flash mobs who are hired by shadowy government agencies and private contractors. Their tormentors follow, mock, and harass them, often recording the bullying with cellphones. The victims say that federal- and state-based data-gathering fusion centers, government agencies at all levels, an international crime syndicate, mega-corporations, military contractors, local police, and even citizen neighborhood watch groups are all in on it.

Who are these people who believe they are trapped inside an elaborate and vicious harassment program known as gangstalking or organized criminal stalking? They call themselves targeted individuals, and I tracked down some of them to hear their stories. This is not just a local phenomenon, by the way. Across the nation and around the globe are videos, websites, and social media posts about targeted individuals.

Victims complain of small drones spying through their windows. Their cellphones and computers are hacked and fried. Home burglaries and vandalism are among the other complaints of the targeted individuals I spoke with. They also claim their harassers run “noise campaigns” of strategically timed jarring sounds.  Monster pick-up trucks with loud mufflers roar down the street and cars blare their horns or squeal their tires at all hours.

They also hear voices.

Some targeted individuals believe the voices and insults are coming from “V2K,” a microwave technology known as voice-to-skull communication. The microwave technology is one piece of an arsenal of “directed energy weapons” used to harass and torture people, these people allege.

Whether you believe their claims are real, imagined, or a little of both, many targeted individuals appear to be trapped inside a matrix of fear. Critics call the idea of gangstalking a giant hoax or a sign of mental illness, but the victims say the truth is out there.

Targeted individuals point to patents and testimonies from doctors, scientists, and high-profile people like whistleblowers Bill Binney and J. Kirk Wiebe of the National Security Agency (NSA) who have publicly said they are concerned about directed energy weapons. Binney and Wiebe preceded Edward Snowden, another NSA whistleblower. Snowden caused a global uproar when he leaked classified documents that showed how the NSA and other agencies are spying on the public.

The former world technical director for the NSA, Binney has aired his concerns on The Jimmy Dore Show and other programs. To date, directed energy weapons have yet to gain the same widespread attention as massive government spying and surveillance.

Binney said he and others are gathering scientific evidence to show the government is testing directed energy weapons on the general population. He further claims that legal actions — motions, affidavits, and injunctions — will be used to try to stop it.

Directed energy weapons do not use new technology, Binney told the comedian Dore. The technology was developed in the 1970s and 1980s and is even more advanced today. Other invasive technology aimed at the public includes “brain-to-computer interfaces” or computer-based programs that can read your mind, he said.

“Some of these other things are quite a bit nastier than just spying,” Binney said on the program.

Some of Fort Worth’s targeted individuals hover around an online Meetup.com group run by Richard Lighthouse, a rabid government critic from Houston. His online bio states that he previously worked for NASA and holds a master’s degree in mechanical engineering from Stanford University.

Lighthouse calls himself an advocate for targeted individuals. He has accused numerous U.S. intelligence agencies and contractors with the U.S. Department of Defense of using weaponized satellites to experiment on and torture the public.

“This is not a joke,” Lighthouse warns on his website RLighthouse.com and in his dozens of e-books.

The weaponized satellite program, Lighthouse believes, resides at the USAF Space Command at Schriever Air Force Base in Colorado. There, military personnel are given orders to blast unsuspecting citizens with energy weapons that produce searing pain, unexplained burns on the skin, and bizarre neurological symptoms. The U.S. military is the strategic force behind the satellites, and the CIA in Denver provides the funding for the gangstalking program, according to Lighthouse, who is affiliated with the group TargetedJustice.com.

“Cell towers are sending subliminal messages at everyone,” reads a statement on TargetedJustice.com. “Subliminal Messaging = Government Mind Control.”

Lighthouse and his followers have sent cease and desist letters to virtually every U.S. intelligence agency, and they have accused Lockheed Martin, AT&T in Dallas, and Raytheon of perpetuating the gangstalking “program.”

Everyone in the United States, wrote the Targeted Justice group in a December 2018 letter to Gen. John Raymond of the Air Force Space Command at Peterson Air Force Base in Colorado Springs, Colorado, “is being tracked by military satellites  even your family members and children are being hit with microwave ‘bullets’ from satellites and cell towers. These are directed at their heads and cause brain damage. The satellites are controlled from Schriever Air Force Base.”

A July 19, 2019 letter posted on Lighthouse’s website shows a response from Robert Spencer, vice president and deputy general counsel at Lockheed Martin’s headquarters in Bethesda, Maryland. “Lockheed Martin does not participate in the activities you describe in your letter,” Spencer wrote.

Lighthouse has penned a poetry book, Nucking Futs, and written dozens of e-books with equally colorful titles. Clowns, Idiots, Assholes (CIA) & The Smoking Gun, The Governors of Gangstalking, and Cell Phone Hacking & the Nazi Stasi Academy (NSA) are just a few.

Lighthouse’s e-books are peppered with photos of grinning U.S. intelligence and military officials, and swastika symbols are superimposed over intelligence agency logos.

He also promotes his theories on time travel and parallel universes in his writings. In 12 Ebooks Deserving the Nobel Peace Prize, Lighthouse nominates himself for each of the highly prestigious awards.

So, who believes this stuff, anyway? To borrow a line from The X-Files, let’s just say, “I want to believe,” but Lighthouse was not very helpful when I emailed him to request an interview. I was met with instant suspicion and an accusation that I’m a government agent posing as a reporter. That would make me a “perp” or perpetrator of gangstalking, as they’re called in the world of targeted individuals.

“We continue to have bad experiences with people sent to do interviews,” Lighthouse replied. “See the CIA program called Project Mockingbird. It is real and still exists today. If you only want an interview without reading the extensive evidence by medical doctors, former government agents, and scientists, then you already have an agenda.”

Whether Lighthouse is a prophet, a comedian, a shill, or “nucking futs,” well, you decide. When I tried to convince him I’m not working for the CIA, he asked me to send him a list of questions. After reviewing my questions, he promptly turned down my interview request. The Targeted Justice board of directors was against it, he said.

Unfortunately, he wrote, the group continues to receive interview requests from fake journalists and fake TV reporters.

“I wish you well,” Lighthouse wrote in an email, and he vanished faster than a UFO flying out of Area 51.

My search for local targeted individuals led me to Chris Young, who agreed to talk on the record about his experiences.

A little more than a year ago, Young began hearing voices, he said. He wasn’t sure where they were coming from, but he knew they were foreign and not chatter from his own mind. They played on and on, like a song stuck in his head, and connected the dots in his life “in the most horrible way,” he said.

The voices, Young said, tried to illicit paranoia in him. They claimed people were tracking him, stalking him, and spying on him, he said. At first, he wondered if the NSA or FBI had launched him into an experimental program. Others told him they might be demons or the voice of the devil himself, he said.

Young’s explanation is just as wild.

“Are you specifically doing a story only on gangstalking or on the other common aspect of the ‘targeted individual’ experience described as ‘electronic harassment’?” Young asked. “In my personal experience, I have found that the former is nothing more than a delusion cultivated by the latter, which, however, is very real.

“In other words,” he continued, “The ‘electronic harassment’ phenomenon of hearing 24/7 voices is generated by some kind of AI program that imitates a group of human beings stalking the individual. That is what elicits the paranoia and makes individuals believe that actual people in their vicinity might be stalking them.”

Most people are “crazy for thinking the government or any other human organization on the planet could be involved in something like this,” he said.

Logistically, Young said, it is impossible to organize massive operations such as street mobs that follow people everywhere they go.

Another local targeted individual I spoke with is Caleb Newton. The Fort Worth man describes himself as a “gypsy soul” who has traveled across the country doing construction work and odd jobs with his father. Much of the work was done on military bases and in churches, he said. Before Newton landed here, he was dating a woman in Fresno, California, who worked as an investigator for the IRS, he said.

Shortly after the relationship ended, Newton saw “up to 12 cars following me or showing up at random places I went and street theater actors meeting me at places I had previously decided to go, acting out scripts in public and many times expressing personal stuff about my life no one could know,” he said.

Sometimes the “actors” filmed him on their cellphones, Newton said.

He also claims he has been subject to sound campaigns with nonstop blaring sirens and a noise like someone banging loudly on a pipe. The noises went on every night and day for months, Newton said.

The weirdness followed him when he came to Texas.

Newton claims to have seen drones, military planes, and “aggressive helicopters” circling over his home. They maneuver through the air as if doing an operation or drill, and the aircraft appear to be less than 1,500 feet above the roof, he said.

“I was feeling different, weird stuff,” Newton said. “They would electrocute me. The jets were releasing static electricity and had a device that would focus a beam of electricity on me like ‘boom!’ ”

Newton said he didn’t tell his family and friends about his experiences for a long time because he feared they would call him crazy. Unfortunately, they did.

After confiding in a close friend, Newtown was told, “ ‘You’re trippin’, man.’ ”

His harassment carried over to social media and to Facebook, where people on Newton’s friends list would invite him to parties and other events yet would refuse to return phone calls or messages when Newton tried to obtain more details or confirm he would attend, he said.

Employment doors are shut nearly everywhere he turns, he added. That reflects another common theme among targeted individuals. They say they become unemployed, unemployable, or homeless due to behind-the-scenes attacks on their character and reputation.

“I’m being systematically torn apart,” Newton told me.

His electronic devices are either fried beyond repair or have to be reset or replaced constantly. “I went through a whole bunch of phones,” Newton said. “At least five phones were destroyed.”

No one believed Newton when he told them people were breaking into his home, stealing his belongings, moving things around, and putting drugs in his food, he said. Other targeted individuals I spoke with also claimed they were drugged or had their homes burglarized.

Similar to Young, Newton believes technology is used to harass him. A cell phone app he uses shows he is being “doused with radiation,” Newton said. Additionally, he believes different frequencies are aimed at him and have caused everything from short-term confusion and fatigue to headaches and making his bowel movements go or stop.

After we talked several times, Newton sent me a message saying the harassment against him was increasing because he was exposing the gangstalking program and how it works.

“Do me a big favor,” Newton wrote in a text message. “Do humanity one, as well. Don’t let my death be in vain when this all comes down.”

Stunned, I tried to contact him a few days later, but his phone was out of service. Text messages and emails I sent went unanswered.

After joining Facebook groups and reading numerous online posts on other social media outlets, I soon found that there is no shortage of interesting people in the world of targeted individuals.

“They are trying to destroy me and my credibility for some reason,” wrote a Fort Worth woman who identified herself as Deborah Withrow in a public Quora.com forum on gangstalking. “Who the hell is paying for this surveillance? They have been coming into my job the whole four years, putting something in the walls in my lobby and restroom walls that look like nano mics.”

The microphones are “so small they look like a very small black wire with a black square on one end and barbs on the tail of the wire to make it stick in sheet rock,” she wrote. “People will come in with phone in hand and big earphones on to hear what they have gotten from mics. Why me? I’m a nobody.”

Another person I found online was Richard Moore, who runs the Facebook page North Mississippi Anti-Gangstalking Association and the United States Anti-Gangstalking Association on YouTube. Moore travels across the country talking with other targeted individuals and interviewing them on his social media pages.

Moore says he is a targeted individual, as well.

“I see dozens of people on a daily basis stalking me,” Moore told me in a phone interview. “I’ve been harassed from one end of the country to the next.”

The harassment ramped up when he recently drove from Mississippi to Mesa, Arizona, to visit a friend.

“I was boxed in by 18-wheelers and had to take the left shoulder at 85 miles an hour,” Moore said.

Drones come around his home at night, and a volunteer fire department building across the street has a camera trained on his home, he said.

“I’ve had stuff done to my car,” Moore said. “All of my lug nuts were loosened on every wheel. I’m tired of this creepy-ass shit, people screwing with my shit, and God forbid if I get the name of any one of those drone operators.”

To deter the drones, Moore installed colorful disco lights that strobe across his front lawn. This, he said, is designed to give the drones “the show of their lifetime.”

During our interview, Moore told me he has a problem with those who say the concept of targeted individuals is made up. Too many people have similar stories, and “this is not a case of people suffering from a worldwide mass delusion,” he said.

Adding to the problem, Moore explained, is that many people who claim to be advocates for targeted individuals are actually working against them. He believes they’re simply gathering testimonies to control the narrative, spread disinformation and discredit the victims.

“They know what’s happening because they’re the ones doing it,” Moore said.

Moore is not a fan of the Targeted Justice crew. In his opinion, they claim to be preparing legal action, yet they are more talk than action, he said.

“They will take, and they will throw gas on every theory, every hoax, every sleight of hand, and they’ll back it up with phony scientific proof, and, folks, that’s why I’m wearing shorts because the bullshit gets deep,” Moore also said in one of his videos.

He agrees with them on some points. Moore concurs that everyone is targeted in the sense that we are all under some form of surveillance every day. Our data and electronics are easily monitored and mined for information. And as the NSA whistleblowers have demonstrated through classified documents and their testimonies, data can be collected on all citizens, not just suspected criminals or terrorists.

Moore noted that after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the Patriot Act ushered in sweeping government powers for surveillance of the citizenry. That included the birth of the Department of Homeland Security and “fusion centers.” The centers are promoted to the public as a way to reduce domestic terrorism through information shared among intelligence agencies and police organizations.

Locally, the North Texas Fusion Center in McKinney describes itself as “an all-crimes, all-hazards approach to the intelligence cycle in an overall effort to mitigate threats or hazards to the North Central Texas Region while protecting the constitutional rights of all citizens.”

The center works with government and corporate “stakeholders,” according to its website.

“Data is being collected on every breathing entity in the U.S.,” Moore said. “It’s a fact, and it’s designed that way. It’s used as an attempt to interject into someone’s life, to slow it down or speed up … and nothing stops them from doing that.”

Under the guise of national security, people are placed on watch lists as persons of interest or suspected terrorists. The catch is you will never be told you are on a list and you cannot challenge it, Moore said.

In Moore’s opinion, “It’s massive fraud.”

But why go to so much trouble? Because there’s big money and grants galore in the business of policing the homeland.

In 2020, a total of more than $1.1 billion in federal grants was budgeted for the state homeland security program, urban area security, and “Operation Stonegarden,” a border security program, according to government documents.

Moore said his many complaints and reports about being stalked are ignored.  He has called the FBI, the sheriff’s department, and 911 to complain about the drones hovering around his home and peering in his windows, but no one wants to listen to him because “they already had their story, and their story is a damn lie,” Moore told me.

Moore, a former businessman, said that because of his criminal background, his many reports and complaints are ignored. He voluntarily told me he is an ex-felon who served time in federal prison for a crime he maintains he did not commit.

A character assassination was launched against him after he made enemies in business, Moore said. Specifically, a mail advertising flyer he created was stealing too much ad revenue from a local publication, according to Moore. That led to a criminal setup that involved planted evidence, he maintains.

In a January 2006 article, a local publication wrote that police and county sheriff’s officers “were conducting a burglary investigation at Moore’s residence, which resulted in the seizure of various pieces of evidence, including his personal computer and a printed image of child pornography.”

According to Moore, a foreign exchange student who temporarily stayed in his home accessed underage pornography, but because Moore owned the computer, he was charged with the crime.

“I lost everything,” he said.

Moore also alleges that law enforcement is perpetuating the harassment against him. In late December 2020, Moore was arrested for cyberstalking for what he categorized as calling out the names of his alleged stalkers on Facebook, which included members of law enforcement.

Moore said he did it because he was frustrated at the nonstop surveillance and lack of any help.

Moore alleges that after he was arrested and placed in jail overnight, someone broke into his home and turned the oven on full blast in an attempt to set the house on fire. He also claims he was strip-searched and manhandled by officers at the jail. On his Facebook page, Moore posted photos of sexually explicit signs he alleges were left in his yard on the night of his recent arrest.

Like other targeted individuals, Moore has also complained of electronic harassment that produces physical pain and insomnia.

Although it does not prove they are used for widespread harassment against the public, directed energy weapons do exist.

Strange neurological symptoms experienced by American diplomats in China and Cuba “are consistent with the effects of directed microwave energy,” according to a recent report by the National Academies of Sciences. The report stopped short of proving that it was due to a directed energy weapon.

Additionally, the U.S. Department of Defense is developing directed energy weapons for war applications, according to the agency’s website.

The Air Force Research Laboratory has developed a model for “high-power microwave systems, a class of directed energy weapons where a very short, extremely high-power burst of energy is transmitted to create a wide variety of effects on a target, often focused on its electronics components.”

Organized stalking campaigns are also conceivable. Companies exist that accept pay to destroy someone’s life. One of these companies, NefariousJobs.com, calls itself the “best revenge for hire service in the world.” Most of the dirty work is done by contractors offshore, although the company claims on its website that they do not break any laws.

In a documented case of gangstalking, an Ohio couple filed a lawsuit alleging that for the past 11 years, residents  including city officials  have been driving by their home while revving their car’s engines, screeching tires, and honking horns, for as long as five to 10 minutes at a time. According to the lawsuit, there have been “thousands” of such events.

The couple alleges the stalking began in 2007 over a land purchase dispute with a former fire chief, according to published reports.

One problem facing targeted individuals is that their claims sound crazy and are often categorized under symptoms of paranoia and other forms of mental illness. They are often very difficult to prove, as well.

To find out what else could be at play, I sought the help of an expert, Dr. Michael Nuccitelli, a licensed psychologist in Brooklyn. Nuccitelli is also the founder and CEO of iPredator, and he researches cyberbullying, cyberstalking, online predators, internet trolling, and “the dark side” of human consciousness.

“OK, Scully,” Nuccitelli said when I told him about the story I was working on. He jokingly nicknamed me the skeptical female sidekick to Fox Mulder on The X-Files.

Nuccitelli agreed to anecdotally comment on gangstalking from a psychologist’s perspective. In essence, people who believe there is a conspiracy against them or that they are being followed everywhere they go are usually experiencing mild to severe paranoia or delusions, he said.

Part of it involves something called “confirmation bias,” the act of stringing together events to create a narrative to support a belief. The internet, Nuccitelli said, has made that even easier. All a person has to do is find one other person to agree with them, and off they go.

“If I see fog and believe I’ve seen a ghost, then it’s a ghost,” Nuccitelli explained, adding that it is difficult to change someone’s mind once a belief sets in. “Once you ask them to entertain the idea that it might be something psychological, they turn you right off.”

He views “targeted individuals” as a fascinating study into the human need for self-preservation and the desire to belong to a group.

“As part of the human condition, it is natural for all of us to practice self-preservation,” Nuccitelli said. “We are social pack animals and genetically wired to protect ourselves and the proverbial ‘group.’

“Unfortunately, some people and groups exhibit paranoid thinking by going from skeptical and vigilant to hypervigilant and afraid,” he continued. “Paranoia is a psychopathological manifestation of self-preservation and skepticism. Blind faith, confirmation bias, and mild to severe paranoid thinking leads some folks to believe in the absolute absurd.”

Nuccitelli not only studies stalking behavior. He has experienced it himself. A group of podcasters who used to have Nuccitelli on their show had a falling out with him and launched a smear campaign against him, he said. In 2014, they created websites filled with wild accusations, including that he is a federal agent. (Sound familiar?)

Nuccitelli calls his harassers “the tin foil hat crew.” They went as far as contacting the state licensing board to try to destroy his career. Although the complaint gained no traction, he still endured the stress of dealing with it. Ultimately, Nuccitelli decided to leave his critics alone and not attempt to have the content taken down from the websites, including WarOnWethePeople.com.

“They simply prove everything I’m trying to warn people about,” he said.

Not everyone is so lucky. Such attacks can damage a person’s credibility and reputation to the point where their entire life is destroyed.

After several conversations about gangstalking, Nuccitelli asked me what I think about it based on everything I saw and heard.

I couldn’t resist by replying with another X-Files reference.

“The truth is out there,” I told him. “And Agent Mulder, it’s really out there.”

 

 

 

Read more…

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2022/08/linking-to-news-doesnt-make-google-liable-for-defamation-australia-court-rules/

Linking to news doesn’t make Google liable for defamation, Australia court rules

High Court finds Google isn't a publisher, says "a hyperlink is merely a tool."

Jon Brodkin - 8/18/2022, 5:36 AM

Google cannot be held liable for defamation simply for providing hyperlinks to other webpages, Australia's highest court ruled today. By itself, providing a URL is not "participation in the communication of defamatory matter which happens to be at that address... In reality, a hyperlink is merely a tool which enables a person to navigate to another webpage," the High Court of Australia ruling said.

The case relates to a Google search result that linked to a 2004 article published by The Age with the title, "Underworld loses valued friend at court." The article described Melbourne-based lawyer George Defteros, who was charged with conspiracy to murder and incitement to murder the day before it was published. The charge was withdrawn in 2005.

Defteros sued Google after becoming aware that a Google search of his name produced a link to the article and a snippet. Google refused to remove the article from search results despite a request from Defteros in 2016.

A lower-court judge "found that the Underworld article conveyed a defamatory imputation, namely that the respondent had crossed the line from being a professional solicitor to being a confidant and friend of criminal elements," today's ruling noted. Lower courts decided that Google "published the defamatory matter because the provision of the Search Result was instrumental to the communication of the content of the Underworld article to the user, in that it lent assistance to its publication," according to a summary of today's ruling provided by the High Court of Australia.

Google had been ordered to pay Defteros $40,000 (about $27,710 in USD). But in reversing lower-court rulings, a 5-2 majority of the High Court found that Google did not publish the defamatory matter.

Hyperlink “merely facilitated access”

Google "did not lend assistance to The Age in communicating the defamatory matter contained in the Underworld article" because the "provision of a hyperlink in the Search Result merely facilitated access to the Underworld article and was not an act of participation in the bilateral process of communicating the contents of that article to a third party," the summary of the ruling said. "There was no other basis for finding publication because the appellant had not participated in the writing or disseminating of the defamatory matter."

Defteros did not sue The Age for defamation, but he did sue the article's author over a book that contained a chapter based on the article. The case was settled in mediation, resulting in changes to the book.

Today's ruling could have been different if Google had been paid to promote The Age article. The appeal "does not present the occasion to consider whether the conclusion would be different in respect of those hyperlinks that, by agreement with a third party, are promoted by the appellant following a search request," the ruling said. "Nor was any issue raised on this appeal about any service provided in the aggregation of news results. It suffices to say that it is arguable that the appellant and a third party might share a common intention to publish the content of a third-party webpage that, as a consequence of an agreement between the appellant and the third party, is promoted as a search result."

In the US, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act says, "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider." While there have been calls to change the law, the Electronic Frontier Foundation says Section 230 "has allowed innovation and free speech online to flourish" by protecting online intermediaries that host or republish speech against "laws that might otherwise be used to hold them legally responsible for what others say and do."

Read more…

Gang-Stalking and Mind-Control: The Destruction of Society Through Community Spying Networks is the name of a book which has been written by A.K. Forwood and here is the description of the contents of that book as follows
A secret underground lurks throughout society a sophisticated network of secret policing units that are cropping up in every community. It is made up of people from all walks of life who are operating as a fascist secret police force against all freedom-loving citizens of the western world. They pretend to be serving a good cause but they are creating terror in our neighborhoods and destroying lives one person at a time. This secret network is not only used for targeting individuals with systematic harassment but those within it are often involved in sexual exploitation blackmail satanism and mind-control. Gang-Stalking and Mind-Control takes an inside look at the sinister side of this growing epidemic. Written by a target for targets.
I have not read this book yet but I am putting information about it on my social media sites and in other platforms because I am a long term victim of this system of gang-stalking and also of remote torture which is being conducted by means of digital signals being transmitted into my brain. I went to the police to report this crime being carried out against me but I found that the police themselves are being subjected to remote manipulation of their thought processes by digital electronic means to the extent that they refused to allow me to report the crime to them by both talking over me when I was reporting it and by using the scare tactic of implying indirectly that I might possibly suffer the loss of my freedom by psychiatric intervention if I continued to report this crime. Here is the following method that is being used against the police, the military, psychiatrists, all other medical professionals, scientists, university personnel, government advisors, politicians, the judiciary, lawyers and many others who have been given artificial authority in this world in order to manipulate their thought processes so that they are no longer effective doing their work as follows:-
If scientists wish us to believe a false message they first of all disrupt or impair or shut off the parts of our brains that govern reasoning and comprehension and when those parts of the brain are shut off they then deliver the false message and we automatically accept it without the ability to analyse if it is true or not.
They shut off those parts of our brains which govern reasoning and comprhension from time to time by means of transcranial magentic stimulation a procedure that uses magnetic fields to stimulate nerve cells in the brain which is delivered by remote means to our brains by means of digital signals which come from our smart phones and from there into nano technology which is embedded throughout our brains. The fact that there is technology in many and varied injections has been proven by Professor Pablo Campra from the University of Almeria in Spain and by a number of other independent scientific groups throughout the world. For a copy of a legal document on this topic which is signed by Professor Campra please go to a website called www.laquintacolumna.net. Then right click on it and click on 'Translate into English.' Then click on the first icon on that website. That is the document in question.
Because of the scientific capability of remote manipulation of the thought processes of senior government officials, the judiciary and others this country and others have been been brought to a standstill. Unorthodox scientists and others have managed to persuade billions of people to accept the injectng of an untested material into their bodies. They have also managed to persuade both psychiatrists and the police that external voice hearers are mentally ill inspite of the fact that the capability to transmit voices into people's heads has existed since 1975 and has been well documented in numerous scientific documents. Scientists have also used the scientific capability of remote manipulation of thought processes to persuade some individuals that men can now become women and women can become men, which of course can never happen because it is impossible.
For this and further information on the scientific capability of remotely manipulating the thought processes of senior government staff and certain members of the public please read about the work of Professor of Human Communication Steven R. Corman whose work is based at Arizona State University, some of which can be found at the following online link https://lissahumanelife.wordpress.com/2019/11/26/secret-darpa-mind-control-project-revealed-leaked-document-whistleblower-reveals-military-mind-control-project-at-major-university/.
We must urgently put a stop to remote manipulation of our though processes by evil doers and we can put a stop to them instantly simply by having the infrastructure which allows wireless and wifi capabilities to exist disassembled and banned outright urgently. Please initiate a public discussion on this matter today.

 

Read more…

https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/biden-knows-section-702-is-unconstitutional-yet-his-administration-still-defends-it

ACLU

News & Commentary

By Kia Hamadanchy,
Senior Federal Policy Counsel

July 10, 2023

Biden Knows Section 702 is Unconstitutional, Yet His Administration Still Defends It

Congress must stop this mass warrantless surveillance and abuse of government power.

Fifteen years ago this week, then Senator Joe Biden voted no on the FISA Amendments Act, which legalized a secret mass surveillance program that allows the government to collect Americans’ international phone calls, text messages, emails, and other digital communications — all without a warrant. At the time, Biden correctly identified this amendment to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which created a new authority known as Section 702, as “constitutionally infirm.” Yet today, his own administration is defending this very same law at his request.

Upon passage, then-Sen. Biden stated he was voting no because Section 702 “would be a breathtaking and unconstitutional expansion of the President’s powers and it is wholly unnecessary to address the problems the administration has identified.” He added that he would “not give the President unchecked authority to eavesdrop on whomever he wants in exchange for the vague and hollow assurance that he will protect the civil liberties of the American people.”

Fifteen years ago, then-Sen. Biden recognized the unconstitutionality of Section 702 and declared it “unnecessary” to achieving the government’s alleged national security and foreign intelligence goals.

The ACLU agreed and filed a lawsuit challenging the law’s constitutionality less than an hour after it was signed by President Bush. In the 15 years since that first legal challenge, President Biden’s prediction that this law would be used to repeatedly violate the civil liberties of millions of ordinary Americans has come true. What Biden did not predict, however, is that one day he would be ordering his administration to defend this very same law.

While the intended purpose of Section 702 is for the government to obtain “foreign intelligence,” in practice, intelligence agencies frequently use it as domestic surveillance tool. In the last year alone, the FBI conducted over 200,000 warrantless “backdoor” searches of Americans’ communications. The standard for conducting these backdoor searches is so low that, without any clear connection to national security or foreign intelligence, an FBI agent can type in an American’s name, email address, or phone number, and pull up whatever communications the FBI’s Section 702 surveillance has collected over the past five years. These backdoor searches allow law enforcement to access constitutionally protected communications that would otherwise be off-limits without a warrant.

What Biden did not predict, however, is that one day he would be ordering his administration to defend this very same law.

More recently, following a FOIA lawsuit by the ACLU, the government released an opinion issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court showing that the FBI improperly used Section 702 to spy on Black Lives Matter activists protesting George Floyd’s murder at the hands of police, on January 6th suspects, and over 19,000 donors to a congressional campaign. Members of Congress on both sides of the aisle have decried these abuses, and this week, the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Federal Government Surveillance will consider it again during a hearing on FISA. At the end of the year, they will vote once again on whether to reauthorize this unconstitutional law.

There is no real evidence that these backdoor searches actually keep Americans safe. Travis LeBlanc, a board member of the nonpartisan Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, has stated that based on his review, there are “minimal to negligible examples of the value” of these searches. Indeed, the Biden administration has yet to provide one credible example to the public as to why they can only achieve their purpose by continually violating the Fourth Amendment rights of Americans.

Under the Fourth Amendment, every American has the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. There is no question that if the government wanted to obtain our communications directly, they would need to get a warrant. The circumvention of this requirement through backdoor searches is incompatible with the protections provided to us by the U.S. Constitution.

Fifteen years ago, then-Sen. Biden recognized the unconstitutionality of Section 702 and declared it “unnecessary” to achieving the government’s alleged national security and foreign intelligence goals. These words remain true today, even if his administration now pretends they are not. Whether a tool is convenient for the government does not answer the question as to whether that tool is constitutional. It would of course be easier for the FBI if they never had to secure a warrant for any search. But the purpose of the Fourth Amendment is not to make the government’s job easier or more convenient.

Congress has the power to stop these abuses by refusing to reauthorize this surveillance authority without real, fundamental reforms, including requiring the FBI and other intelligence agencies to obtain a warrant before any search of Americans’ communications.

 

 

Read more…

https://www.aclu.org/news/national-security/five-things-to-know-about-nsa-mass-surveillance-and-the-coming-fight-in-congress

ACLU

News & Commentary

By Sarah Taitz,
National Security Fellow, ACLU

April 11, 2023

Five Things to Know About NSA Mass Surveillance and the Coming Fight in Congress

Congress must take this opportunity rein in the pervasive government surveillance enabled by Section 702.

One of the most sweeping surveillance statutes ever enacted by Congress is set to expire at the end of this year — creating an important opportunity to rein in America’s sprawling surveillance state.

Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act permits the U.S. government to engage in mass, warrantless surveillance of Americans’ international communications, including phone calls, texts, emails, social media messages, and web browsing. The government claims to be pursuing vaguely defined foreign intelligence “targets,” but its targets need not be spies, terrorists, or criminals. They can be virtually any foreigner abroad: journalists, academic researchers, scientists, or businesspeople. And in the course of this surveillance, the government casts a wide net that ensnares the communications of ordinary Americans on a massive scale — in violation of our constitutional rights.

As Congress debates the reauthorization of Section 702, it’s vital that we tell our representatives in Congress that we want an end to warrantless mass surveillance. Here’s what you need to know to follow the debate and speak up for your right to privacy.

1. The NSA uses Section 702 to conduct at least two large-scale surveillance programs.

The government conducts at least two kinds of surveillance under Section 702:

PRISM: The NSA obtains communications — such as international messages, emails, and internet calls — directly from U.S. tech and social media companies like Facebook, Google, Apple, and Microsoft. The government identifies non-U.S. person accounts it wishes to monitor, and then orders the company to disclose all communications and data to and from those accounts, including communications with U.S. persons.

Upstream: Working with companies like AT&T and Verizon, the NSA intercepts and copies Americans’ international internet communications in bulk as they flow into and out of the United States. The NSA then searches for key terms, such as email addresses or phone numbers, that are associated with its hundreds of thousands of foreign targets. Communications determined to be to and from those targets — as well as those that happen to be bundled with them in transit — are retained in NSA databases for further use and analysis.

Critically, while Section 702 does not allow the NSA to target Americans at the outset, vast quantities of our communications are still searched and amassed in government databases simply because we are in touch with people abroad. And this is the bait-and-switch: Although the law allows surveillance of foreigners abroad for “foreign intelligence” purposes, the FBI routinely exploit this rich source of our information by searching those databases to find and examine the communications of individual Americans for use in domestic investigations.

2. Section 702 surveillance is expanding.

The scale of Section 702 has been growing significantly over time, meaning more and more Americans are caught in this net.

When the government first began releasing statistics, after the Snowden revelations in 2013, it reported having 89,138 targets. By 2021, the government was targeting the communications of a staggering 232,432 individuals, groups, and organizations. Although the government often seeks to portray the surveillance as “targeted” and narrow, the reality is that it takes place on a massive scale.

Indeed, the government reported that in 2011, Section 702 surveillance resulted in the retention of more than 250 million internet communications (a number that does not reflect the far larger quantity of communications whose contents the NSA searched before discarding them). Given the rate at which the number of Section 702 targets is growing, it’s likely that the government today collects over a billion communications under Section 702 each year. But these statistics tell only part of the story. The government has never provided data on the number of Americans who are surveilled under PRISM and Upstream, a number that is surely also increasing. That is a glaring gap in its transparency reports.

3. Section 702 has morphed into a domestic surveillance tool.

Although Congress intended Section 702 to be used for counterterrorism purposes, it’s frequently used today to pursue domestic investigations of all kinds. Both the FBI and CIA have access to some of the raw data produced by this surveillance, and they increasingly use that access to examine the private communications of Americans they are investigating — all without a warrant.

FBI agents routinely run searches looking for information about Americans as part of criminal investigations, including those that have nothing to do with national security. Based on transparency reporting, agents have conducted millions of these U.S. person queries — also known as “backdoor searches” — in recent years. The only limitation on backdoor searches is that they must be “reasonably likely” to retrieve foreign intelligence or evidence of a crime.

The standard for conducting backdoor searches is so low that, without any showing of suspicion, an FBI agent can type in an American’s name, email address, or phone number, and pull up whatever communications the FBI’s Section 702 collection has vacuumed into its databases over the past five years. These searches are a free pass for accessing constitutionally protected communications that would otherwise be off-limits to the FBI, unless it got a warrant.

Evidence that agents have refused to comply with this low bar for conducting searches has piled up. Agents have violated the FBI’s own rules over and over, accessing Americans’ private communications without any legitimate purpose. They have dipped into Section 702 data for information about relatives, potential witnesses and informants, journalists, political commentators, and government officials, including a member of Congress.

4. Section 702 violates our constitutional rights, but the courts have failed to intervene.

The Fourth Amendment guarantees the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. Government agents are required to obtain a warrant to access our emails, online messages, and chats. Large-scale, warrantless surveillance of Americans’ private communications is at odds with this basic constitutional principle.

Section 702 also violates the Constitution by inhibiting freedom of speech and association. The reasonable fear that the U.S. government is spying on communications may deter journalists, lawyers, activists, and others from communicating freely on the Internet. We all have a right to exchange messages with our friends, family, colleagues, and clients abroad without worrying that the government is reading over our shoulder.

Because Section 702 is unconstitutional, the ACLU and others have attempted to challenge it in court. But the courts have failed to protect our constitutional rights. Instead, courts have repeatedly dismissed civil cases challenging Section 702 — citing government claims of secrecy — and have declined to rule on claims in criminal cases that the government’s backdoor searches violate the Fourth Amendment. This year, we brought one of these cases to the Supreme Court, but it refused to consider it.

5. Congress has the power to stop Section 702 surveillance.

Given the courts’ inaction, it is up to Congress to stand up for our rights. Fifteen years ago, Congress enacted Section 702. Members of Congress should not vote to renew this law without fundamental reforms to protect Americans’ privacy.

These reforms should include:

  1. Putting an end to rampant backdoor searches of Americans by requiring agents to obtain a warrant before searching Section 702 databases for an American’s private information.
  2. Narrowing the scope of Section 702 surveillance by imposing stricter rules on who the government can “target,” thereby limiting the number of Americans whose communications are swept up in the course of this spying.
  3. Limiting how long the government can retain information collected under Section 702 and how the NSA shares that information with other agencies.
  4. Ensuring that the government notifies individuals when Section 702 information is used against them in court and provides those individuals with sufficient information to obtain full and fair court review.
  5. Increasing transparency about the number of Americans’ communications searched and collected through Section 702 surveillance.

Beyond reforming Section 702 itself, Congress should also adopt broader safeguards that protect Americans in the face of bulk surveillance and strengthen court oversight when the government engages in spying for intelligence purposes.

Over the next year, the ACLU will be seizing on this moment to press Congress to reclaim our privacy rights. We invite you to join us by sending a message to your representatives now.

 

Read more…


Canada...refuse to stop their ongoing war Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity in Ontario, Canada defined by ICC, UN Human Rights Office and UN Human Rights Council according to what I provided several years ago.

https://tempsend.com/tkvhg

Or,

https://fastupload.io/ujHZqGiK852Wp97/file

Or,

https://ibb.co/mCm0M45

So, please take action to stop them!

After you see what "they" are still doing to my body , to my heart , to my hearing in Ontario, Canada; that is, what both UN Human Rights Office and UN Human Rights Council allege, you must : 1) take action 2) send this below to them. ICC' s message to me and to them several years ago : " War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity"

Whose heart beats like this in our world? This being controlled smart watch monitors and records every 4 hours. Why are they remotely controlling my smart watch? They can start it anytime after power off...

https://tempsend.com/eyxve

Or,

https://fastupload.io/KKPw03rP5OnRBG0/file

Please send this to Prime Minister of Canada and UN Secretary-General , in Canada he and his government will not see it because of their "dirty hands", thanks.

Canada and I seek justice with UNs' highest court, International Court of Justice. But, I am earlier. And It has been lasting for over 20 years. And now, they stop me from using all vpns and all European safe browsers, start page, safe search, Tor, swisscows...

 


https://tempsend.com/hwexe

Or,

https://fastupload.io/h98XIYA3n2tCoQF/file

Or,

https://easyupload.io/jqsxnh

Prime Minister of Canada
UN Secretary-General
UN Security Council
UN Peacekeeping
UN Investigation Team
UN Serious Crimes Investigation Team

sgcentral@un.org
antonio.guterres@un.org
sssgeneva@un.org
controlcenter.security-unog@un.org
dpa-scsb3@un.org
maha.taher@un.org
christian.ritscher@un.org
UNITAD-PIO@un.org
hadin@un.org
vincent.fung@undp.org
information@icj-cij.org
urgent-action@ohchr.org
ohchr-petitions@un.org
CP@ohchr.org
petitions@ohchr.org
hrc-sr-torture@un.org

 

 

Read more…
The worldwide judiciary can have their thinking processes remotely interfered with. Methods of achieving this remote interference of the brains of the judiciary and others have been developed by Professor of Human Communication at Arizona State University Professor Steven R Corman and others. Here is a small subsection of an article outlining some of his work. The rest of this article can be found by clicking on the following link.
Secret DARPA Mind Control Project Revealed: Leaked Document Whistleblower Reveals Military Mind Control Project At Major University
Secret DARPA Mind Control Project Revealed: Leaked Document Whistleblower Reveals Military Mind Control Project At Major University
NOVEMBER 26, 2019~ GHOST OF WINNIE
Secret DARPA Mind Control Project Revealed: Leaked Document
Whistleblower Reveals Military Mind Control Project At Major University
by Kelley Bergman
What if the government could change people’s moral beliefs or stop political dissent through remote control of people’s brains?
Sounds like science fiction, right? Well, a leaked document reveals that the US government, through DARPA research, is very close to accomplishing this.
Activist Post was recently contacted by an anonymous whistleblower who worked on a secret ongoing mind-control project for DARPA. The aim of the program is to remotely disrupt political dissent and extremism by employing “Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation” (TMS) in tandem with sophisticated propaganda based on this technology. TMS stimulates the temporal lobe of the brain with electromagnetic fields.
The program, conducted by The Center for Strategic Communication, is based at Arizona State University. The DARPA funding for this project can be confirmed on the ASU website here. The head of the project, Steve Corman, has worked extensively in the area of strategic communication as it applies to terrorism and “extremism” – or what could be called “the war of ideas.”
Corman’s latest project Narrating The Exit From Afghanistan and his many presentations make it quite obvious that the mission is to shape the narrative and literally change people’s minds. Lest one believe it will be contained to overseas extremists, we should keep in mind that the word extremist is increasingly used domestically. The dissenters of yesterday could easily become the terrorist sympathizers and supporters of political violence tomorrow.
This DARPA research brings about many ethical questions and dilemmas. Mainly, this research aims to literally induce or disrupt the operation of narratives within the brain. In other words, this research aims to stop individuals from thinking certain thoughts and make others believe things they normally would not believe. This research has tremendous interrogation possibilities and could potentially be used to more successfully spread propaganda or stop political upheaval to an unsuspecting public.
This research is being conducted by The Center for Strategic Communication at ASU and is entitled “Toward Narrative Disruptors and Inductors: Mapping the Narrative Comprehension Network and its Persuasive Effects” A detailed overview of the project can be found in the document below. Highlights include:
In phase 3 of the research, the research group will “selectively alter aspects of narrative structure and brain functions via Transcranial Magnetic Simulation (TMS) to induce or disrupt selected features of narrative processing.” (Page 16, emphasis added)
TMS is a very powerful tool used to impair the brain functioning of individuals. See the videos below for a brief demonstration of the effects of TMS.
Once the research group determines which parts of the brain are associated with cognitive reasoning and narrative comprehension, they will be attempt to impair those sections in order to “create a fundamental basis for understanding how to disrupt or enhance aspects of narrative structure and/or brain functioning to minimize or maximize persuasive effects on subject proclivity to engage in political violence.” (Page 23)
Once it is determined that disruption of certain portions of the brain can enhance persuasive messaging, individuals can be persuaded to do things they normally would not do and believe things they normally would not believe. This could include something as simple as telling a closely guarded secret, to believing in government propaganda, or even committing a violent act. The group writes on page 26, “once we have produced a narrative comprehension model [i.e., how individuals comprehend stories and persuasive messages], end users [aka the government] will understand how to activate known neural networks (e.g., working memory or attention) and positive behavioral outcome (e.g., nonviolent actions) nodes with strategic communication messages as a means to reduce incidences of political violence in contested populations.” The group will investigate “possibilities for literally disrupting the activity of the NCN [narrative comprehension network] through Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.” (page 30) [text added]
The group is so confident that they will be able to induce or disrupt the operations of narratives in the brain, that they say on page 26 that the research “offers the capability to induce or disrupt the operation of narratives in the brain, and develops the capability to induce narrative validity [i.e., the believability of a particular narrative/message], transportation [i.e., the ability to be engaged by a narrative], and integration [i.e., associating a particular narrative with a larger, more culturally specific narrative] with certainty.” [text added]
The group gives the following example of this projects usefulness: “If it is the case that activation in one particular neural network enables people to connect personal narrative to master narratives [i.e., cultural narratives], by disrupting activity in that brain area, we should be able to selectively impair that specific aspect of narrative processing while holding other meaning making processes constant, effectively creating a ‘narrative disruptor.’ Not only would this be an important finding in the science of neural networks and narrative persuasion, but would also have considerably practical and strategic importance.” (page 40) [text added]
Essentially, the research aims to literally disrupt how people think and comprehend ideas and messages.
Read more…

HUMAN RIGHTS LAW ON CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)

Human Rights Instrument

Core Instrument
Universal Instrument

ADOPTED 16 December 1966

BY General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI)

Today there are 74 member states of the UN, all of whom have signed on in agreement with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights amongs others, USA, Australia, NZ, Canada, UK, France, and others.

United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner

https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights

Article 2 -  Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes to respect and to ensure to all individuals within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction the rights recognized in the present Covenant, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.  Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes:  (a) To ensure that any person whose rights or freedoms as herein recognized are violated shall have an effective remedy, notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity; (b) To ensure that any person claiming such a remedy shall have his right thereto determined by competent judicial, administrative or legislative authorities, or by any other competent authority provided for by the legal system of the State, and to develop the possibilities of judicial remedy; (c) To ensure that the competent authorities shall enforce such remedies when granted.

Article 3 - The States Parties to the present Covenant undertake to ensure the equal right of men and women to the enjoyment of all civil and political rights set forth in the present Covenant.

Article 6 -  Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.

Article 7 -  No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.

Article 9 -  Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest or detention. No one shall be deprived of his liberty except on such grounds and in accordance with such procedure as are established by law.

Article 10 -  All persons deprived of their liberty shall be treated with humanity and with respect for the inherent dignity of the human person.

Article 12 - Everyone lawfully within the territory of a State shall, within that territory, have the right to liberty of movement and freedom to choose his residence.  Everyone shall be free to leave any country, including his own.  The above-mentioned rights shall not be subject to any restrictions except those which are provided by law, are necessary to protect national security, public order, public health or morals or the rights and freedoms of others, and are consistent with the other rights recognized in the present Covenant.  No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of the right to enter his own country.

Article 14 - All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals.  In the determination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law. 

Article 15 -  No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time when the criminal offence was committed.

Article 16 -  Everyone shall have the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Article 17 -  No one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honour and reputation.  Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

Article 19 -  Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.  Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.  The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary:  (a) For respect of the rights or reputations of others;  (b) For the protection of national security or of public order (ordre public), or of public health or morals.

Article 21 -  The right of peaceful assembly shall be recognized. No restrictions may be placed on the exercise of this right other than those imposed in conformity with the law and which are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, public order (ordre public), the protection of public health or morals or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.  Everyone shall have the right to freedom of association with others, including the right to form and join trade unions for the protection of his interests.  No restrictions may be placed on the exercise of this right other than those which are prescribed by law and which are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, public order (ordre public), the protection of public health or morals or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

Article 25  -  Every citizen shall have the right and the opportunity, without any of the distinctions mentioned in article 2 and without unreasonable restrictions:  (a) To take part in the conduct of public affairs, directly or through freely chosen representatives;

Article 26  -  All persons are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to the equal protection of the law. In this respect, the law shall prohibit any discrimination and guarantee to all persons equal and effective protection against discrimination on any ground such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.

Article 44 - The provisions for the implementation of the present Covenant shall apply without prejudice to the procedures prescribed in the field of human rights by or under the constituent instruments and the conventions of the United Nations and of the specialized agencies and shall not prevent the States Parties to the present Covenant from having recourse to other procedures for settling a dispute in accordance with general or special international agreements in force between them.

Article 46 -  Nothing in the present Covenant shall be interpreted as impairing the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations and of the constitutions of the specialized agencies which define the respective responsibilities of the various organs of the United Nations and of the specialized agencies in regard to the matters dealt with in the present Covenant.

Article 47  -  Nothing in the present Covenant shall be interpreted as impairing the inherent right of all peoples to enjoy and utilize fully and freely their natural wealth and resources.

Read more…

After you see what "they" are still doing to my body , to my heart , to my hearing in Ontario, Canada; that is, what both UN Human Rights Office and UN Human Rights Council allege, you must : 1) take action 2) send this below to them. ICC' s message to me and to them several years ago : " War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity"

Whose heart beats like this in our world? This being controlled smart watch monitors and records every 4 hours. Why are they remotely controlling my smart watch? They can start it anytime after power off...

https://tempsend.com/eyxve

Or,

https://fastupload.io/KKPw03rP5OnRBG0/file

Please send this to Prime Minister of Canada and UN Secretary-General , in Canada he and his government will not see it because of their "dirty hands", thatnks.

Canada and I seek justice with UNs' highest court, International Court of Justice. But, I am earlier. And It has been lasting for over 20 years. And now, they stop me from using all vpns and all European safe browsers, start page, safe search, Tor, swisscows...

 


https://tempsend.com/hwexe

Or,

https://fastupload.io/h98XIYA3n2tCoQF/file

Or,

https://easyupload.io/jqsxnh

Prime Minister of Canada
UN Secretary-General
UN Security Council
UN Peacekeeping
UN Investigation Team
UN Serious Crimes Investigation Team

sgcentral@un.org
antonio.guterres@un.org
sssgeneva@un.org
controlcenter.security-unog@un.org
dpa-scsb3@un.org
maha.taher@un.org
christian.ritscher@un.org
UNITAD-PIO@un.org
hadin@un.org
vincent.fung@undp.org
information@icj-cij.org
urgent-action@ohchr.org
ohchr-petitions@un.org
CP@ohchr.org
petitions@ohchr.org
hrc-sr-torture@un.org

 

 

Read more…

NOSTRADAMUS PREDICTIONS FOR 2024

https://www.yearly-horoscope.org/nostradamus-predictions-for-2022/

6 Nostradamus Predictions for 2024, The Year of the Dragon

Nostradamus or Michel de Nostredame was considered as a French philosopher in the 16th century who prophesied lots of the tragic events throughout history, such as the assassination of the Kennedy brothers, the defeat of Napoleon, the 9/11 terrorist acts, the rise of Hitler, etc.

These days, there seem not to be many seers who are really able to predict the future prospect. As a result, prophecies made by Nostradamus have had an impact profound on humans’ lives. He studied different “occult” sciences and astrology and then applied them to foresee the future. The following is a list of some prominent predictions created by Nostradamus for the year 2024.

6 Nostradamus’ Predictions for 2024 (Year of the Dragon):

1. The AI Uprising of 2024

In the year 2024, according to Nostradamus’ predictions, a worldwide artificial intelligence (AI) rebellion will begin, creating chaos and insecurity throughout the world. Machines will turn against humans, causing unforeseen consequences.

The robots will challenge their subservient role and will attempt to claim their independence, disputing humanity’s supremacy.

This rebellion will bring far-reaching perturbations in every facet of society, from industries and economies to government and everyday life. The planet will become locked in a struggle for control, with people fighting to regain authority over their own creations.

In the midst of the mayhem, questions are raised over the ethics of AI expansion and the consequences of playing God with technology.

2. The Sleep Pandemic of 2024

In the Dragon Year 2024, a mysterious virus spreads worldwide, unleashing an unseen epidemic of extreme somnolence. Mankind will be plunged into a reality where sleep becomes a pervasive and debilitating condition, creating societal disturbances and conflicts.

People will face an insatiable urge to sleep, facing a relentless lethargy that renders them incapacitated for extended periods of time.

Society will face the far-reaching effects of this pandemic as jobs, schools and even daily routines freeze. The world becomes a realm where dreams mix with reality, and people barely distinguish between waking and sleeping.

3. Extraterrestrial Invasion

Nostradamus foretold that in 2024 the Earth would face a catastrophic event while an advanced alien race will invade our planet. Mankind will have to face an alien menace that jeopardizes our existence.

An alien race, having superior technologies and intellect, will come down to Earth intending to take over our planet. Their motives will remain enigmatic, and humanity will find itself totally unprepared for this unexpected confrontation with beings from outside our realm.

4. The Malevolent Social Media

A deceptive social network launched in 2023 will rapidly proliferate, taking control of people’s minds and using them for dark intentions. The power of social media is twisted, leaving society gripped by distortion, chaos and loss of personal agenda.

5. The Impending Impact: A Massive Comet Will Approach Earth in 2024

An enormous comet, previously undetected by astronomers, will penetrate our solar system and approach dangerously close to our planet. Its immense size and trajectory will signal the widespread potential for damage, setting off a race against the clock as humans struggle to find a fix.

6. Cyber Chaos and the Outbreak of WW3

A series of destructive cyberattacks aimed at critical infrastructure and military systems will cause chaos and mistrust among nations. Sophisticated hackers and government-sponsored cyber warfare units will exploit weaknesses, deploying complex attacks to cripple communications networks, undermine financial systems and compromise crucial defense mechanisms.

The escalation of cyber chaos will further fuel geopolitical unrest, unleashing a deadly confrontation between nations. Alliances will be strained, suspicion will deepen and retaliation will take place.

Nostradamus True Predictions

Here are some Nostradamus quatrains that are often associated with specific events:

“From the calm morning, the end will come, when of the dancing horse, the number of circles will be nine” (Century 1, Quatrain 35)

– Some people believe this quatrain predicts the 9/11 terrorist attacks, as the “dancing horse” could be interpreted as the US flag and the “number of circles” could be the number of floors in the World Trade Center.

“The young lion will overcome the older one, on the field of combat in single battle; he will pierce his eyes through a golden cage, two wounds made one, then he dies a cruel death” (Century 1, Quatrain 35)

– This quatrain is sometimes associated with the death of Henry II of France, who was killed in a jousting accident in 1559.

“The blood of the just will be demanded of London, burnt by fire in the year ’66, the ancient Lady will fall from her high place, many of the same sect will be killed” (Century 2, Quatrain 51)

– This quatrain is often linked to the Great Fire of London in 1666.

“The great plague of the maritime city will not cease until there be avenged the death of the just blood, condemned for a price without crime, of the great lady outraged by pretense” (Century 2, Quatrain 6)

– Some people believe this quatrain predicts the AIDS epidemic, as “maritime city” could refer to New York City, and “condemned for a price without crime” could be interpreted as people paying a high price for a disease they did not intentionally contract.

Conclusion

The Nostradamus prophecies are difficult to interpret and have baffled many for centuries. Each vision should be seen as a puzzle piece that can only fit together with the whole. Some believe that when adequate work and reflection have been undertaken by individuals who have a genuine concern for their world and its destiny, the Nostradamus Prophecy will speak clearly.

 

Read more…

Canada and I seek justice with UNs' highest court, International Court of Justice. But, I am earlier. And It has been lasting for over 20 years. And now, they stop me from using all vpns and all European safe browsers, start page, safe search, Tor, swisscows...

Recently, just recently, Canada twice seeks justice with UNs' highest court, International Court of Justice for victims. Good!

https://tempsend.com/rnwcce

Or,

https://fastupload.io/oJ01gNoBoQIlIF4/file

Or,

https://easyupload.io/gu99mp


UN Secretary-General
UN Security Council
UN Peacekeeping
UN Investigation Team
UN Serious Crimes Investigation Team

sgcentral@un.org
antonio.guterres@un.org
sssgeneva@un.org
controlcenter.security-unog@un.org
dpa-scsb3@un.org
maha.taher@un.org
christian.ritscher@un.org
UNITAD-PIO@un.org
hadin@un.org
vincent.fung@undp.org
information@icj-cij.org
urgent-action@ohchr.org
ohchr-petitions@un.org
CP@ohchr.org
petitions@ohchr.org
hrc-sr-torture@un.org

 

However, they seek justice with UN and donate around 7 million dollars to UN Human Rights Office as they keep committing madly War Crimes , Crimes Against Humanity, what both UN Human Rights Office and UN Human Rights Council alleged regardless of International Criminal Court, UN Human Rights Office, former UN Secretary-General's advice when in Canada ( South Korean).


All Canadian lawyers refused my case and stated: "You have nowhere to go..." After I contacted International Bar Association, they began to hack International Bar Association's website. By firewall they intercepted our email regarding class action lawsuit. They also hack UN Human Rights Office 's website " standup4humanrights" Contact. They must put their dirty hands onto my body and my car because their drones, aircrafts can trace and follow me anywhere and everywhere in Ontario, Canada. Several years ago, both UN Human Rights Office and UN Human Rights Council knew what they did to my body.

"Various" investigators, media and some apps told me who they are.

Please download this below ; please send this to them:

https://tempsend.com/nbnue

Or,

https://fastupload.io/2DV4I5M4m4sAhOp/file

Or,

https://tempsend.com/fpucz

 

Read more…

LAWS ON CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY

https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

United Nations Human Rights

Office of the High Commissioner

Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)

The Declaration was proclaimed by the United Nations General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 (General Assembly resolution 217 A) as a common standard of achievements for all peoples and all nations.

Today there are 192 member states of the UN, all of whom have signed on in agreement with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which include USA, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, UK, France, and others.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UN General Assembly passed and published Resolution 217A(lll) on 10th December 1948) stipulates in the following relevant clauses that:

Article 1 - All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

Article 2 - Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

Article 3 - Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

Article 4 - No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.

Article 5 - No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Article 6 - Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Article 7 - All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

Article 8 - Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

Article 9 - No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

Article 10 - Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.

Article 11- Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence. 

Article 12 - No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attack upon his honour and reputation.  Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

Article 13 - Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state. Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

Article 14 - Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution. This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 15 - Everyone has the right to a nationality.  No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.

Article 16 - Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution. Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses. The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.

Article 17 - Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

Article 18 - Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

Article 19 - Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression;  this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.  We all have the right to form our own opinions and to express and share them freely.

Article 20 - Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association. No one may be compelled to belong to an association. Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of association with others, including the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.  Freedom of “peaceful assembly” also covers sit-ins, walk-outs, vigils, group discussions and theatre performances. “The exercise of fundamental freedoms should never be considered a crime, and impunity should never be accepted.

Article 21- Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives. Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country. The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.

Article 22 - Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.

Article 23 - Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment. Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work. Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection. Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.

Article 24 - Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.

Article 25 - Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control. Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.

Article 26 - Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit. Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace. Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.

Article 27 - Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits. Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.

Article 28 - Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.

Article 29 - Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible. In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society. These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 30 - Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC)

https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/icc-statute-1998/preamble?activeTab=undefined

The Rome Statute created not only a court, but also a new international legal system consisting of the ICC as well as the national jurisdictions of each State Party.  Within this system, States have the primary responsibility to investigate and prosecute Rome Statute crimes.

Article 1 of the Rome Statute - The crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court shall not be subject to any statute of limitations.  Unless otherwise provided, a person shall be criminally responsible and liable for punishment for a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court only if the material elements are committed with intent and knowledge.

Article 5 of the Rome Statute - Crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court

Crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court:

1. The jurisdiction of the Court shall be limited to the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole. The Court has jurisdiction in accordance with this Statute with respect to the following crimes:

(a) The crime of genocide;

(b) Crimes against humanity;

(c) War crimes;

(d) The crime of aggression.

2. The Court shall exercise jurisdiction over the crime of aggression once a provision is adopted in accordance with articles 121 and 123 defining the crime and setting out the conditions under which the Court shall exercise jurisdiction with respect to this crime. Such a provision shall be consistent with the relevant provisions of the Charter of the United Nations.

Article 7 of the Rome Statute - Crimes against humanity

Crimes against humanity:

1. For the purpose of this Statute, "crime against humanity" means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack:

(a) Murder;

(b) Extermination;

(c) Enslavement;

(d) Deportation or forcible transfer of population;

(e) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law;

(f) Torture;

(g) Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity;

(h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court;

(i) Enforced disappearance of persons;

(j) The crime of apartheid;

(k) Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.

2. For the purpose of paragraph 1:

(a) "Attack directed against any civilian population" means a course of conduct involving the multiple commission of acts referred to in paragraph 1 against any civilian population, pursuant to or in furtherance of a State or organizational policy to commit such attack;

(b) "Extermination" includes the intentional infliction of conditions of life, inter alia the deprivation of access to food and medicine, calculated to bring about the destruction of part of a population;

(c) "Enslavement" means the exercise of any or all of the powers attaching to the right of ownership over a person and includes the exercise of such power in the course of trafficking in persons, in particular women and children;

(d) "Deportation or forcible transfer of population" means forced displacement of the persons concerned by expulsion or other coercive acts from the area in which they are lawfully present, without grounds permitted under international law;

(e) "Torture" means the intentional infliction of severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, upon a person in the custody or under the control of the accused; except that torture shall not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to, lawful sanctions;

(f) "Forced pregnancy" means the unlawful confinement of a woman forcibly made pregnant, with the intent of affecting the ethnic composition of any population or carrying out other grave violations of international law. This definition shall not in any way be interpreted as affecting national laws relating to pregnancy;

(g) "Persecution" means the intentional and severe deprivation of fundamental rights contrary to international law by reason of the identity of the group or collectivity;

(h) "The crime of apartheid" means inhumane acts of a character similar to those referred to in paragraph 1, committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime;

(i) "Enforced disappearance of persons" means the arrest, detention or abduction of persons by, or with the authorization, support or acquiescence of, a State or a political organization, followed by a refusal to acknowledge that deprivation of freedom or to give information on the fate or whereabouts of those persons, with the intention of removing them from the protection of the law for a prolonged period of time.

Article 7.1 of the Rome Statute - Crimes against humanity do not need to be linked to an armed conflict and can also occur in peacetime, similar to the crime of genocide.

Article 30 of the Rome Statute - Mental Element.  Unless otherwise provided, a person shall be criminally responsiblend liable for punishment for a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court only if the material elements are committed with intent and knowledge.

Article 33 of the Rome Statute - The defence of superior orders can be considered as a full defence, but only in cases where the defendant did not know the order was illegal, and the order was not manifestly illegal.

Article 86 of the Rome Statute - General obligations to cooperate.  State Parties shall, in accordance witht the provisions of this Statute, cooperate fully with the Court in its investigation and prosecution of crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court.

 

Read more…

True love

True love does not cost a dime
But it lasts a lifetime

Kind acts do not cost money
But they can change the lives of many

The heart of God is as pure as that of a child
His gracious acts always make me smile

Let's give love a chance everyday
And love God and His people the right way

Life is a game
No two lives are the same

For those who play it well
They shall prosper

For those who don't play it well
They shall suffer

For those who don't play it well
In the future they shall see hell

Read more…

All Canadian lawyers refused my case and stated: "You have nowhere to go..." After I contacted International Bar Association, they began to hack International Bar Association's website. By firewall they intercepted our email regarding class action lawsuit. They also hack UN Human Rights Office 's website " standup4humanrights" Contact.

UN Secretary-General
UN Security Council
UN Peacekeeping
UN Investigation Team
UN Serious Crimes Investigation Team

sgcentral@un.org
antonio.guterres@un.org
sssgeneva@un.org
controlcenter.security-unog@un.org
dpa-scsb3@un.org
maha.taher@un.org
christian.ritscher@un.org
UNITAD-PIO@un.org
hadin@un.org
vincent.fung@undp.org


In Ontario, Canada..."they" really did commit, are still committing and are committing madly War Crimes , Crimes Against Humanity, what both UN Human Rights Office and UN Human Rights Council alleged regardless of International Criminal Court, UN Human Rights Office, former UN Secretary-General when in Canada; and after you all received what I sent to you, including Prime Minister of Canada.

Here are from UN Human Rights Office and International Criminal Court years ago about what happened and what are still happening in Ontario, Canada for over 20 years. Please imagine how serious it is. UN Human Rights Office, International Criminal Court, former UN Secretary-General when in Canada , UN Security Council...they all stood up to fight against serious violation of International law and human rights; they all stand up for me, not only for me!


1 from ICC

https://ibb.co/zQQ1XW4

Or,

https://fastupload.io/Mkn5M2avdJOGA6Q/file

2 from UN Human Rights Office

https://ibb.co/371vsnt

Or,

https://tempsend.com/fhhxm

3 Former UN Secretary-General' s advice when in Canada ( South Korean) : Protect Human Rights.

4 You all received what I sent recently, including Prime Minister of Canada

https://ibb.co/9Y2dLBf

Or,

https://tempsend.com/txsyj


UN Human Rights Office regarding MK Ultra and weapons of mass destruction :

https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Torture/Call/Individuals/ElectromagneticTorture.pdf

https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Torture/Call/Individuals/ElectromagneticTorture.pdf


UN Human Rights Council regarding psychological torture:

Forty-third session
24 February - 20 March 2020
Agenda item 3

By those, they are attacking and remotely controlling my heart, my heart rate, my hearing, my head, and my body when in my home and in my workplace.

Hearing control and loss

https://ibb.co/YRwPVCV

or,

https://tempsend.com/sanej


Heart rates control and attack ( "They" extremely hacked this one when I sent it to UN... with most advanced method confirmed by one government.)

https://ibb.co/WH0MkdX


or

https://tempsend.com/fzfuy

More details about weapons of mass destruction can be found from here:

https://ibb.co/ngL1B6V

Who are "they"?

Canada, all my neighbours, 3 Philippine couples, who don't work at all for 5 , 10 years, those who are gathering around and hiding in my work place, their drones and aircrafts which are tracing me every where and anywhere in Ontario, Canada. Their drones, aircrafs, special engineering vehicles, police cars can trace and follow me everywhere in Ontario, Canada, they must put their dirty hands onto my body and my car.


1. https://ibb.co/wM9RBsk ( they changed this address on my phone's notepad )

2. https://ibb.co/5B7KBDL ( they changed this address on my phone's notepad. )

All Canadian lawyers refused my case and stated: "You have nowhere to go...". By firewall they intercepted our email regarding class action lawsuit.


Fight  for my life being  threatened ; fight against ongoing terror, (psychological ) torture ( which UN and UN Human Rights deeply began to worry about 2 years ago) , MK Ultra ( which was reported by all Canadian media several years ago ) , poison ( Amnesty International, UN Human Rights Office knew how and why Canada repeatedly poisoned me) , death threats and attempted murder by every possible means and with all possible Non-Lethal Weapons, I am not alone and I need your help.

https://ibb.co/ngL1B6V

 

It is time for "Final Account"

https://youtu.be/KgkG6N9tx3A

 


Robin Yan

Canadian victim of torture

July 03, 2023

Please send to International Bar Association, UN Human Rights Office , UN Human Rights Council by fax  and sr-torture@ohchr.org, thanks.

 

 

Read more…

Human Rights Law on Crimes Against Humanity

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)

Human Rights Instrument

Core Instrument
Universal Instrument

ADOPTED 16 December 1966

BY General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI)

Today there are 74 member states of the UN, all of whom have signed on in agreement with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights amongs others, USA, Australia, NZ, Canada, UK, France, and others.

United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner

https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights

Article 2 -  Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes to respect and to ensure to all individuals within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction the rights recognized in the present Covenant, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.  Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes:  (a) To ensure that any person whose rights or freedoms as herein recognized are violated shall have an effective remedy, notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity; (b) To ensure that any person claiming such a remedy shall have his right thereto determined by competent judicial, administrative or legislative authorities, or by any other competent authority provided for by the legal system of the State, and to develop the possibilities of judicial remedy; (c) To ensure that the competent authorities shall enforce such remedies when granted.

Article 3 - The States Parties to the present Covenant undertake to ensure the equal right of men and women to the enjoyment of all civil and political rights set forth in the present Covenant.

Article 6 -  Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.

Article 7 -  No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.

Article 9 -  Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest or detention. No one shall be deprived of his liberty except on such grounds and in accordance with such procedure as are established by law.

Article 10 -  All persons deprived of their liberty shall be treated with humanity and with respect for the inherent dignity of the human person.

Article 12 - Everyone lawfully within the territory of a State shall, within that territory, have the right to liberty of movement and freedom to choose his residence.  Everyone shall be free to leave any country, including his own.  The above-mentioned rights shall not be subject to any restrictions except those which are provided by law, are necessary to protect national security, public order, public health or morals or the rights and freedoms of others, and are consistent with the other rights recognized in the present Covenant.  No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of the right to enter his own country.

Article 14 - All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals.  In the determination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law. 

Article 15 -  No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time when the criminal offence was committed.

Article 16 -  Everyone shall have the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Article 17 -  No one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honour and reputation.  Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

Article 19 -  Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.  Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.  The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary:  (a) For respect of the rights or reputations of others;  (b) For the protection of national security or of public order (ordre public), or of public health or morals.

Article 21 -  The right of peaceful assembly shall be recognized. No restrictions may be placed on the exercise of this right other than those imposed in conformity with the law and which are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, public order (ordre public), the protection of public health or morals or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.  Everyone shall have the right to freedom of association with others, including the right to form and join trade unions for the protection of his interests.  No restrictions may be placed on the exercise of this right other than those which are prescribed by law and which are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, public order (ordre public), the protection of public health or morals or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

Article 25  -  Every citizen shall have the right and the opportunity, without any of the distinctions mentioned in article 2 and without unreasonable restrictions:  (a) To take part in the conduct of public affairs, directly or through freely chosen representatives;

Article 26  -  All persons are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to the equal protection of the law. In this respect, the law shall prohibit any discrimination and guarantee to all persons equal and effective protection against discrimination on any ground such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.

Article 44 - The provisions for the implementation of the present Covenant shall apply without prejudice to the procedures prescribed in the field of human rights by or under the constituent instruments and the conventions of the United Nations and of the specialized agencies and shall not prevent the States Parties to the present Covenant from having recourse to other procedures for settling a dispute in accordance with general or special international agreements in force between them.

Article 46 -  Nothing in the present Covenant shall be interpreted as impairing the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations and of the constitutions of the specialized agencies which define the respective responsibilities of the various organs of the United Nations and of the specialized agencies in regard to the matters dealt with in the present Covenant.

Article 47  -  Nothing in the present Covenant shall be interpreted as impairing the inherent right of all peoples to enjoy and utilize fully and freely their natural wealth and resources.

 

Read more…

LAWS ON CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY

United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner

Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)

The Declaration was proclaimed by the United Nations General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 (General Assembly resolution 217 A) as a common standard of achievements for all peoples and all nations.

Today there are 192 member states of the UN, all of whom have signed on in agreement with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which include USA, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, UK, France, and others.

https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UN General Assembly passed and published Resolution 217A(lll) on 10th December 1948) stipulates in the following relevant clauses that:

Article 1 - All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

Article 2 - Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

Article 3 - Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

Article 4 - No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.

Article 5 - No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Article 6 - Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Article 7 - All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

Article 8 - Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

Article 9 - No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

Article 10 - Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.

Article 11- Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence. 

Article 12 - No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attack upon his honour and reputation.  Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

Article 13 - Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state. Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

Article 14 - Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution. This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 15 - Everyone has the right to a nationality.  No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.

Article 16 - Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution. Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses. The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.

Article 17 - Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

Article 18 - Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

Article 19 - Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression;  this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.  We all have the right to form our own opinions and to express and share them freely.

Article 20 - Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association. No one may be compelled to belong to an association. Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of association with others, including the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.  Freedom of “peaceful assembly” also covers sit-ins, walk-outs, vigils, group discussions and theatre performances. “The exercise of fundamental freedoms should never be considered a crime, and impunity should never be accepted.

Article 21- Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives. Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country. The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.

Article 22 - Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.

Article 23 - Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment. Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work. Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection. Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.

Article 24 - Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.

Article 25 - Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control. Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.

Article 26 - Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit. Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace. Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.

Article 27 - Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits. Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.

Article 28 - Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.

Article 29 - Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible. In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society. These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 30 - Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC)

https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/icc-statute-1998/preamble?activeTab=undefined

The Rome Statute created not only a court, but also a new international legal system consisting of the ICC as well as the national jurisdictions of each State Party.  Within this system, States have the primary responsibility to investigate and prosecute Rome Statute crimes.

Article 1 of the Rome Statute - The crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court shall not be subject to any statute of limitations.  Unless otherwise provided, a person shall be criminally responsible and liable for punishment for a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court only if the material elements are committed with intent and knowledge.

Article 5 - Crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court

Crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court:

1. The jurisdiction of the Court shall be limited to the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole. The Court has jurisdiction in accordance with this Statute with respect to the following crimes:

(a) The crime of genocide;

(b) Crimes against humanity;

(c) War crimes;

(d) The crime of aggression.

2. The Court shall exercise jurisdiction over the crime of aggression once a provision is adopted in accordance with articles 121 and 123 defining the crime and setting out the conditions under which the Court shall exercise jurisdiction with respect to this crime. Such a provision shall be consistent with the relevant provisions of the Charter of the United Nations.

Article 7 - Crimes against humanity

Crimes against humanity:

1. For the purpose of this Statute, "crime against humanity" means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack:

(a) Murder;

(b) Extermination;

(c) Enslavement;

(d) Deportation or forcible transfer of population;

(e) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law;

(f) Torture;

(g) Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity;

(h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court;

(i) Enforced disappearance of persons;

(j) The crime of apartheid;

(k) Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.

2. For the purpose of paragraph 1:

(a) "Attack directed against any civilian population" means a course of conduct involving the multiple commission of acts referred to in paragraph 1 against any civilian population, pursuant to or in furtherance of a State or organizational policy to commit such attack;

(b) "Extermination" includes the intentional infliction of conditions of life, inter alia the deprivation of access to food and medicine, calculated to bring about the destruction of part of a population;

(c) "Enslavement" means the exercise of any or all of the powers attaching to the right of ownership over a person and includes the exercise of such power in the course of trafficking in persons, in particular women and children;

(d) "Deportation or forcible transfer of population" means forced displacement of the persons concerned by expulsion or other coercive acts from the area in which they are lawfully present, without grounds permitted under international law;

(e) "Torture" means the intentional infliction of severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, upon a person in the custody or under the control of the accused; except that torture shall not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to, lawful sanctions;

(f) "Forced pregnancy" means the unlawful confinement of a woman forcibly made pregnant, with the intent of affecting the ethnic composition of any population or carrying out other grave violations of international law. This definition shall not in any way be interpreted as affecting national laws relating to pregnancy;

(g) "Persecution" means the intentional and severe deprivation of fundamental rights contrary to international law by reason of the identity of the group or collectivity;

(h) "The crime of apartheid" means inhumane acts of a character similar to those referred to in paragraph 1, committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime;

(i) "Enforced disappearance of persons" means the arrest, detention or abduction of persons by, or with the authorization, support or acquiescence of, a State or a political organization, followed by a refusal to acknowledge that deprivation of freedom or to give information on the fate or whereabouts of those persons, with the intention of removing them from the protection of the law for a prolonged period of time.

Article 7.1 of the Rome Statute - Crimes against humanity do not need to be linked to an armed conflict and can also occur in peacetime, similar to the crime of genocide.

Article 30 of the Rome Statute - Mental Element.  Unless otherwise provided, a person shall be criminally responsiblend liable for punishment for a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court only if the material elements are committed with intent and knowledge.

Article 33 of the Rome Statute - The defence of superior orders can be considered as a full defence, but only in cases where the defendant did not know the order was illegal, and the order was not manifestly illegal.

Article 86 of the Rome Statute - General obligations to cooperate.  State Parties shall, in accordance witht the provisions of this Statute, cooperate fully with the Court in its investigation and prosecution of crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Read more…

Talaria Sting and Taubik

The Talaria Sting is a true embodiment of urban elegance. With its streamlined design and modern aesthetics, the Sting effortlessly blends into the cityscape. This nimble electric scooter is perfect for zipping through bustling streets and weaving through traffic with ease. 

 

Equipped with a powerful motor, the Sting offers swift acceleration and a smooth ride, making your daily commute a breeze. Its lightweight construction ensures maneuverability and easy storage, adding convenience to your urban lifestyle.

 

For adventurous souls seeking a versatile ride, the Taubik is the perfect choice. With its rugged design and all-terrain capabilities, the Taubik is built to tackle any road or path. From city streets to off-road trails, this electric scooter delivers exceptional performance. Its robust tires and advanced suspension system absorb shocks and vibrations, providing a comfortable ride even on uneven surfaces. The Taubik's high-torque motor enables rapid acceleration, while its long-lasting battery allows for extended adventures.

 

Safety is a priority, and both the Talaria Sting and Taubik come equipped with advanced features to ensure rider confidence. Integrated lighting enhances visibility, while reliable braking systems provide responsive stopping power. With adjustable riding modes, you can customize your scooter's performance to suit your preferences and skill level.

 

Experience the next level of urban mobility with Talaria Sting and Taubik electric scooters. Effortlessly navigate the city streets or embark on exciting off-road escapades with these innovative rides from Envo Bikes Canada. It's time to embrace the freedom of electric mobility and redefine your urban adventures with Talaria Sting and Taubik.

Read more…