Blogs

All Posts (12433)

Sort by

Maron May's recorded letter before it in the public

Posted by Daniel Morgan on November 23, 2014 at 12:29am

undefined


Im just sending your some interesting points on the last few days that might be good for your show.
 Our group FFCHS just received one of the seven packages sent out by Myron May the FSU Shooter. we copied the letter before the content of the package was taken by investigators, Myron was a former Prosecutor and attorney  involved with Targeted individual international one of the groups Im involved with trying to get a class action law suit going.......  This also happened with Aaron Alexis the Navy yard shooter contacted our group 1-2 weeks before his rampage....

Read more…

Controlling Genetic material with Your Mind!!!

Posted by David ofTomorrow on November 21, 2014 at 6:35am

ETH Researchers Develop a Thought-Controlled Genetic Interface

Swiss scientists achieve a remarkable mashup of optogenetics, synthetic biology, and brain control.

We’ve seen a lot of interesting experiments with EEG recently. Researchers have used these brain signals to fly a toy helicopter, make a rat’s tail twitch, operate a tablet computer, and get a paraplegic wearing an exoskeleton to kick a ball at the World Cup (see “World Cup Mind-Control Demo Faces Deadlines, Critics”).

Now Marc Folcher, Martin Fussenegger, and colleagues at the ETH Zurich, in Switzerland, have gone a step further. They used EEG to give human volunteers direct brain control over the activity of living cells, a technology they’re calling the world’s first-ever “mind-genetic interface.”

Using the interface they designed, the ETH team showed a human volunteer wearing an EEG cap could use his thoughts to trigger production of a particular protein, called SEAP, in human kidney cells growing in a petri dish. He could also turn on supplies of the cells that had been implanted under the skin of lab mice.

The research is interesting because it shows how futuristic brain implants might function, Folcher and company write in this week’s Nature Communications. Such devices, the ETH authors speculate, might sense a person’s feelings of pain (or perhaps oncoming epileptic seizure) and then automatically trigger brain cells to pump out a helpful biotech drug.  

To build their interface, the ETH team combined three technologies, each of which is exciting in its own right: brain-computer interfaces, synthetic biology, and optogenetics.

First, they engineered the kidney cells with bacterial DNA, creating what synthetic biologists like to call a “genetic switch”—a series of genes that, together, work to turn on production of a particular protein, in this case SEAP.  

To trigger this switch to the on position, the ETH gang used optogenetics, adding a gene from the purple bacteria Rhodobacter sphaeroides that produces a light-sensitive molecule. Now, when they used an LED light to shine some near-infrared light onto their cells, the switch flipped, and they immediately began making SEAP.

So far, so good. But to complete their cybernetic stunt, the scientists had volunteers don EEG caps—that’s an electrode covered cloth that picks up electrical waves from the brain. These waves can be roughly controlled by a person if they concentrate. In itself, EEG is nothing new—here’s a video of the Beatles’ John Lennon using EEG to control a musical instrument in the 1970s.

But the ETH team wanted to be the first to ever turn human thoughts into electrical pulses, then into light, and finally into proteins. They did it by having the volunteers use their brain waves to turn the LED light on, thereby triggering the cells to make the SEAP protein. In summary, say Folcher and company, “we designed a mind-genetic interface that uses brain waves to remotely control target gene transcription wirelessly.”

You might ask what the point is. One answer is that a lot of scientists right now are interested in next-generation brain implants. They are hoping to improve deep-brain stimulation, a medical technology widely used to stop the tremors of Parkinson’s disease. These brain implants stop tremors using a wire placed in a brain region called the thalamus. The patient turns it on and gets a fairly strong current of electricity, which immediately makes the tremors cease. It’s a technology that does wonders, even though no one is sure how it works.

Work has already started on tomorrow’s implants—and these may function just as the ETH team envisions. For instance, the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parksinson’s Research has been paying for research on how to replace the electrodes in deep-brain stimulators with fiber optics. Instead of electric shocks, it would send out pulses of light to control the neurons that don’t function right in Parkinson’s. 

Just as important to next-generation implants is the idea of direct brain control. Instead of the patient having to turn on their device on manually, a so-called “open loop” system, the goal is to close the loop with an implant that can read brain signals, and know when a tremor is starting. That way, the implant would react automatically when treatment is needed.

That means the ETH team’s crazy mind-DNA interface isn’t so crazy after all.

Read more…

Humans Computers And Everything in Between: Towards Synthetic Telepathy

Posted by FULL NAME on November 19, 2014 at 10:33pm
by Linda XuWhen you imagine telepathy, your mind probably jumps immediately to science fiction: the Vulcans of Star Trek, Legilimency in Harry Potter, or the huge variety of superheroes and super-villains who possess powers of telekinesis or mind control. Twenty years ago, these concepts would have been mere fictional speculation, but today, in neuroscience labs around the world, new research is turning the startling possibility of brain-to-brain communication into reality.Imagine this: a man wearing a strange polka-dot cap sits in front of a computer screen, watching an animated rocket fly from a pirate ship toward a city. In the game, the only defense against the rocket is a cannon, which can be fired by pressing a key on a keyboard in an adjacent room. As the man watches the rocket make its first flight from the ship, he thinks about moving his finger, without actually moving anything at all.In the adjacent room, another capped man — his cap connected to the first man’s through wires, a computer, and the internet — sits with his hand relaxed over the keyboard, unable to see the first man and oblivious to the impending doom of his animated city. Suddenly, his brain receives a jolt of electrical stimulation, and his finger involuntarily jerks down on the key, bringing down the rocket. Together, these two men have successfully saved the city, and more importantly, they have achieved the once unthinkable task of direct brain-to-brain communication (1).If you haven’t been keeping up with the current neuro-technology scene, the above scenario may sound like nothing more than a tale of scientific fancy. However, incredibly enough, this exact experiment was completed just a few months ago at the University of Washington and is only the latest in a long string of milestones toward “synthetic telepathy.” In this article, we will touch upon each of these milestones, and most notably on the development of the brain computer interface, a key stepping stone in the path to the brain-to-brain interface. After a brief discussion of the research itself, we will then take a look at the ethics of the technology and what these advancements really mean for the rest of us.From Synapses to SensationIn order to fully appreciate brain interface technology, one must go back to the basics of neuroscience. The nervous system (consisting of the spinal cord and the brain) is made up of cells called neurons, which have the unique characteristic of being able to communicate with each other using electrical signals, through connections called neural synapses (2). Using this communication system, one neuron can send an electrical “message” to another neuron or even to an entire network of neurons, allowing for an immense number of possible firing patterns. This complexity is the primary reason why, to this day, the exact mechanisms by which neural firing patterns create phenomena like memory, consciousness, sensory experience, and motor action remain largely unknown.Despite this obstacle, scientists have discovered ways to manipulate the brain without completely understanding the mechanisms behind its activity. Twentieth-century neurosurgeon Wilder Penfield was at the forefront of this advancement, earning the title as the “greatest living Canadian” for his famous neural stimulation experiments (3). During his surgeries, Penfield probed the brains of his numbed but conscious patients and observed what effect probing a certain area of the brain had on the patient. Remarkably, Penfield found that stimulation of specific areas of the brain correlated with very specific functions and areas of the body; for instance, probing the temporal lobes would cause the patient to undergo a vivid memory recall, while probing another area of the brain might cause the feeling of being rubbed on the stomach or pinched on the left foot (3).This rudimentary “brain-poking” experiment was what eventually led scientists to the theory that thought and behavior could be predicted by measuring patterns of activity in the brain. In other words, Penfield’s observations implied that someone could get an idea of what you were doing or thinking simply by taking relatively basic measurements of the changes in your brain activity. From this theory, the path was paved for the development of the first brain computer interface, a device that could connect a brain to a computer that would record and interpret its activity. Three basic steps would be required to achieve this landmark development: reliable detection of the electrical activity of the brain, accurate interpretation of the meaning of this activity, and prompt transformation of this interpreted activity into useful action.The Dawn of the Brain Computer InterfaceA solution to the first step in creating the first brain computer interface (reliable detection of the electrical activity of the brain) was already on its way by 1929, when German neurologist Hans Berger recorded the first human electroencephalogram (EEG) (4). By placing external electrodes on the scalp of a 17-year-old surgical patient, Berger was able to measure the electrical potential across the electrodes and thus detect the changing electrical activity of the neurons in the patient’s brain. To this day, the EEG remains one of the most common methods of recording activity in the brain, favored over the MRI and PET scan for its cheap and relatively simple procedure. The next step, then, was to translate this recorded brain activity into meaningful information.This step was taken in the 1970s by researchers at UCLA, funded by none other than the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the leading national organization in military defense research. In a project rightfully named the Brain-Computer Interface project, researchers strove to develop the first interface between a brain and a computer that would not only detect brain activity but interpret it and use it for communicative or medical purposes (5). In a resulting publication from this project, researcher Jacques Vidal laid out the basics for BCI research, exploring the potential methods, limitations, and possibilities for the development of a EEG-based BCI, a device that he believed was still in the far future (5).While laying the foundations for BCI research, Vidal could not have predicted the rapid string of breakthroughs that would follow in the next decades. Already by the late 1960s and 1970s, researchers like Eberhard Fetz were able to demonstrate that brain activity could actually be controlled to a significant extent, as demonstrated by the successful training of a monkey to deliberately increase the rate of its neural firing in specific neurons (6). In the 1980s, correlations between brain activity and motor response were specified in great detail, allowing scientists to pinpoint the exact neurons and firing patterns behind specific movements (7). In 1999, Miguel Nicolelis, who would go on to create the first animal brain-to-brain interface just fourteen years later, trained rats to control a robotic limb using only their brains (8).By the 21st century, the media had caught up to the breakneck speed of BCI research, with the popularization of fMRI image reconstruction, touted by reporters to give scientists the ability to “pee[r] into another man’s mind” (9). In these studies, subjects viewed specific images — anything from a simple black plus sign to a fully colored landscape — and their concomitant brain activity was recorded by an fMRI machine. Based solely on this recorded brain activity, scientists were able to use computer algorithms to “reconstruct” the image viewed by the subject with startling accuracy (10). Dubbed as “mind-reading” and as a possible avenue for an accurate lie detector, fMRI image reconstruction brought the incredible possibilities of BCI research into the public eye.The Brain-to-Brain Interface: From Reading Minds to Controlling MindsHowever, where things start to get truly exciting — and truly controversial — is not in brain-computer interface research, but in the pioneering field of brain-to-brain interface (BBI) research. While BCI connects a brain to a computer that then interprets brain activity, BBI connects a brain to another brain, which can then receive information from the first brain or even be induced to perform specific behaviors, as in the example of the telepathic cannon game. Arguably, BBI is not significantly different than BCI; a brain can simply be seen as a more sophisticated, organic computer, and the BBI as just the next logical extension of the BCI. Nevertheless, there is an undeniable sense of intrigue that comes with the idea of connecting living brains.It is difficult to overstate the sheer magnitude of possibilities in this new field of research, but it is also important to not stray too far from the raw experimental findings. Research in this area began most notably in the aforementioned Nicolelis Lab at Duke University, in a study on rat brain-to-brain interface. In the 2013 study, “A Brain-to-Brain Interface for Real-Time Sharing of Sensorimotor Information,” two rats were placed in separate cages and each given a choice of two levers — one that resulted in a reward of water and one that did not. A rat dubbed the “encoder” rat was shown a flash of light above the correct lever and was trained to learn this association. The “decoder” rat, on the other hand, was given no visual cues, but its brain received the stimulation from the cortical area of the “encoder” rat through the BBI. In a breakthrough finding, Nicolelis discovered that the “decoder” rat was able to make the correct choice of lever with over 70% accuracy, with no cues or information except for the learned knowledge “sent” by the neural activity of the “encoder” rat’s brain (11).Within the year, researchers at Harvard Medical School were able to connect a human brain and a rat brain through BBI and move a rat’s tail with 94% accuracy, using only the deliberate neural activity of the human’s brain (12). Four months later, the experiment described in the introduction was completed at the University of Washington, demonstrating the first successful use of a human brain-to-brain interface (1).Hopes and considerations for the futureWe are only in the infancy of BCI and BBI research, and as the technology continues to take leaps and bounds into the future, more and more areas of our lives will feel the impact of these advances. In particular, prosthetic limbs, prosthetic vision devices, prosthetic hearing devices, and communication devices for paralytics are all currently being implemented as prototypes, such as the robotic arm created at Brown University in 2012, which allowed a woman who had been paralyzed for nearly 15 years to use a robotic arm to drink a bottle of coffee (13). Outside of the medical field, research in military communication technology has continued to progress, as demonstrated in the research of Gerwin Schalk, who recently published a study on the successful identification of spoken and imagined words using EEG (14).Although advances in games and entertainment may seem trivial compared to the more “practical” developments of medicine and technology, the impact of brain interface technology in everyday life is certainly worth pondering as well. Imagine, for instance, being able to play virtual video games in which you control your character simply by thinking an action or imagining a scenario. Companies like NeuroSky, Mindflex, and Necomimi are already putting out BCI products for the public, including a game that uses “brain force” to navigate a ball through a maze and a pair of costume cat ears that wiggle, perk up, or lay flat depending on your neural activity. As research continues, devices such as these are sure to be welcomed into the entertainment world and could even be used for educational or therapeutic purposes, for adults and children alike.Undoubtedly, brain interface technology has both the power and the potential to do incredible good. With this in mind, it is crucial to also recognize the possibility for ethical wrongdoing. Concerns with privacy, autonomy, enhancement, and consequent aggravation of social stratification are only a handful of the ethical issues on the horizon, and these concerns are only intensified by the fear of media exaggeration and inaccuracy. Furthermore, philosophical questions of human existence will become increasingly important as research progresses. What does it mean for brains to be “connected?” What kind of information can be taken and shared between living brains? What distinguishes a human from a machine, and what — if anything — distinguishes a brain from a computer? These questions may have been impossible to answer in the past, but with the advancement of brain-to-brain interface technology, we may reach satisfying answers at last.In the end, the future of a world with brain interface technology relies on the preparation and research done today. Consideration of the ethical issues to come, as well as thorough discussion of the boundaries that must be set, will help to ensure that ethical lines are not crossed in our enthusiasm to push the limits of technology. From medicine and military technology to games and recreation, brain interfacing truly has the potential to change the world. By maintaining a judicious balance between scientific progress and ethical caution, we can ensure that these changes are for the better.Linda Xu is a sophomore in Eliot concentrating in Neurobiology.ReferencesR. P. N. Rao and A. Stocco. (2013). Direct brain-to-brain communication in humans: a pilot study. [Online]. Available: http://homes.cs.washington.edu/~rao/brain2brain/index.html. [2014, Feb. 24].M. F. Bear et al., Ed., Neuroscience (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, ed. 2, 2007).Wilder Penfield. PBS. [Online]. Available: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aso/databank/entries/ bhpenf.html. [2014, Feb. 24].L. Haas, Hans Berger (1873–1941), Richard Caton (1842–1926), and electroencephalography. J Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 74, 9 (2003).J. J. Vidal, Toward direct brain-computer communication. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 2, 157-180 (1973).A. P. Georgopoulous, J. T. Lurito, M. Petrides, A. B. Schwartz, J. T. Massey. Mental rotation of the neuronal population vector. Science 243, 234-236 (1989).E. E. Fetz. Operant conditioning of cortical unit activity. Science 163, 955-958 (1969).J. K. Chapin, K. A. Moxon, R. S. Markowitz, M. A. L. Nicolelis. Nature Neuroscience 2, 664-670 (1999).J. Wise. Thought Police: How Brain Scans Could Invade Your Private Life. Popular Mechanics. [Online]. Available: http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/health/nueroscience/4226614. [2014, Feb. 25].F. Tong and M. S. Pratte. Decoding patterns of human brain activity. Annual Review of Psychology 63, 483-509 (2012).M. Pais-Vieira, M. Lebedev, C. Kunicki, J. Wang, M. A. L. Nicolelis. A brain-to-brain interface for real-time sharing of sensorimotor information. Scientific Reports 3, 1-10 (2013).S. Yoo, H. Kim, E. Filandrianos, S.J . Taghados, S. Park. Non-invasive brain-to-brain interface (BBI): establishing functional links between two brains. PLoS ONE 8, e60410 (2013).L. R. Hochberg, D. Bacher, B. Jarosiewicz, N. Y. Masse, J. D. Simeral et al. Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm. Nature 485, 372-375 (2012).X. Pie, D. L. Barbour, E. C. Leuthardt, G. Schalk. Decoding vowels and consonants in spoken and imagined words using electrocorticographic signals in humans. J. Neural Eng. 8, e046028 (2011).http://harvardsciencereview.com/2014/05/01/synthetic-telepathy/
Read more…

Acoustic Wave Technology. (SAW)

Posted by silvia miras sanchez on November 18, 2014 at 11:42am

9143165497?profile=originalS.A.W. Surface Acoustic Wave Technology. (SAW) is based on the use of ultrasonic waves that are transmitted on the touch screen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Cf7IL_eZ38
Do you remember SAW THE MOVIE? Someone had created a BIG NASTY controlling REMOTELY dramatization, and gave the opportunity to the people chosen to survive by eliminating the others or inflicting physical harm. A PURGE to PAIN another change KNEW ...

The interaction between atoms and light is well known and has been widely studied in the field of quantum optics. However Swedish researchers explained, to achieve the same type of interaction with the sound waves was a more challenging task.

The effort paid off and now got records of acoustic waves from the artificial atom specially created for this purpose. The study was conducted in collaboration with experimentalists and theorists.
http://www.lagranepoca.com/33189-registran-particulas-sonido-atomo-acustico-primera-vez


WE HAVE BECOME BioPlasma TELEVISION IN WHICH ELECTROMAGNETIC PULSES SENT FOR CODED OPERATIVIDAD.SOMOS RECOGNIZED BY A SOURCE CODE, PRINTED ON A CHIP.
AND THE SYSTEM IS THE SAME AS PRESUPUESTAMENTE SAW !!!!
We are like the touch screen, we are a morphic field exoskeleton with an electromagnetic field created with ION.


An artificial atom can absorb and emit waves sonido.Un hologram is made of artificial atoms arising from biological reality. We are an active biological structure covered bioplasma electromagnetically to be operating with SAW, presupuestamente ...

9143166280?profile=original

Read more…

15/11/2014 Saturday was kept awake half the night last night with fresk jibberish hongky and singaporean voices..the usual tricks of bringing it on and off .....then this morning was attacked with a p

Posted by Sonique on November 15, 2014 at 12:00am

15/11/2014 Saturday

was kept awake half the night last night with fresk jibberish hongky and singaporean voices..the usual tricks of bringing it on and off .....then this morning was attacked with a putrid singaporean voice saying: "u r too material istic..we would give all our money to help our brothers. .."
lol

Read more…

14th Nov 2014 Melbourne Australia

Posted by Sonique on November 14, 2014 at 10:04am

Today at work in the pharmacy in sunshine melbourne Australia. ...I opened up and 3 clients were already waiting outside for me....one of them by the name of bryan henderson was wearing a tshirt that says something about kicking ass... (I didnt noticed initially)....anyway....after serving him...I realised the cash registers monitor is shorted....ie not working....and while I was in the process of opening the tills...I could smell something burning...like a smoky smell....which I commented on to my next client...anyway...I knew I was being perped again as it always begin in similar ways....I could also feel my ass being manipulated with again while serving bryan with the perping tshirt....yawn yawn

Read more…

New World Order = Corruption

Posted by TI in Florida on November 12, 2014 at 4:12pm
Are they telling us that with all the sophisticated systems they have in place to verify identity, especially SS#s and/or fingerprints, they can not properly handle determining duplicate voters in multiple states? I realize that many states have already been manipulated/persuaded/conned/swindled into doing away with fingerprints for drivers licenses, but maybe they need to restore that fingerprint requirement. Many states have now been persuaded into using Crosscheck software for voter verification, which supposedly kicks people off the voter registration lists if 2 people in different states have the same name. There are millions of people in the USA that share the same names, that is a ridiculous way to determine if they are registered in more than one state. Even Intellius knows that. Why is America becoming so inept at something that should be so straightforward? And why is America allowing itself to be manipulated by so many false flag voter situations (I thought only intelligence operatives did this)? Do your jobs efficiently and verify voter identity in an effective manner.Subversives may be rigging the elections by deliberately using a faulty methodology that prematurely kicks people off the voter registration lists? Is this another sign of pervasive corruption by those with too much money & too much influence? These subversive orgs are trying to find ways to corrupt & destroy the foundations of our country & our economy. This "New World Order" can try their corrupt methods on Mars after they move there, but leave Earth alone.https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/11/07/voter-suppression/"In Georgia, meanwhile, nearly 40,000 new voters mysteriously vanished from the rolls, possibly due to scrubbing by a controversial software system known as Crosscheck. ..... Crosscheck scours the names of voters who live in the 27 states, and if a first and last name matches in two states both persons are flagged and purged. The surnames most likely to be flagged? “The lists are heavily weighted with names such as Jackson, Garcia, Patel and Kim — ones common among minorities”, Al Jazeera reported. “List matching is an inaccurate science that burdens, disproportionately, minority voters”, said Wendy Weiser, director of the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice. Weiser also claimed that voter complaints to her group’s hotline were higher this year than ever before."
Read more…

command algorithms in computational evolution,VIDEO

Posted by silvia miras sanchez on November 12, 2014 at 12:14pm

command algorithms in computational evolution

Cerebro-interfaz(chip)-programa virtual de inteligencia artificial basada en comandos de algoritmos programados con computacion evolutiva. CONTROL MENTAL y ni te enteras porque actua con la PROTOIDEA, antes de ser manifiesta conscientemente.
command algorithms in computational evolution
Mirad esto yo veo un comando de algoritmos en evolucion computacional, ¿Y tu QUE VES?

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=716865151718406&set=vb.100...

Read more…

Holy Family and parabolic effect

Posted by silvia miras sanchez on November 12, 2014 at 11:26am

9143167479?profile=originalConsciousness is altered by states of consciousness, and this is possible through continuous psychic rape of electromagnetic pulses with different operatividades.
Gaudi designed a BIG COMPLAINT LIVING that is not being VISTA.Con the HOLY FAMILY tells a story: GRAVITY IS RELATIVE, I alter the number PHI conventional cathedrals to create airspace with details such as parabolic curves, with the TELECOM hAVE GOT tO CREATE AN INFRASTRUCTURE ELECTROMAGNETIC to quantify and find VIRTUALLY ALL. Gaudi left us his technique by first creating the GRAVITY WEIGHT with models that exhibits in the museum, then the DEFY GRAVITY EFFECT creating MORGANA, GHOSTLY effect with optically full deformation structures in mobimiento, gives the feeling that mueben.
MORGANA is a moody fairy and its effect MIRAGE creates a HOAX to the physical senses. La Sagrada Familia is a SUPERIOR MIRAGE, as physics reveals that grabedad has been arbitrarily manipulated, something that tells us what is holy is false.
Notice the curve of a parabolic flight, have the same curvature, there is a space microgravity in the top ... reminiscent of jet lag effect, which creates an altered state of consciousness ...
Gaudi predicted that in 2026 the BASILICA would be a rendezvous of PEACE to all races and culturas..Cuando all do our part and draw the truth of each for a greater good of others, we will deserve freedom.
Barcelona continues to lead the news ... A homage to Gaudi and his parabolic curves.
http://barcelonapaseodegracia.com/presentacion-de-las-luce.../

Read more…

MOBBING ELECTRONIC WEAPONS

Posted by silvia miras sanchez on November 12, 2014 at 9:29am

VICTIM TARGETED INDIVIDUAL AS I CAN NOT DEMAND RESPECT IN MY CITY. A REAL ESTATE suffered MOBBING ELECTRONIC WEAPONS AND THE GOVERNMENT IS IN THE EVICTION OF NEIGHBORS ...

The Barcelona pro-independence government is managing:
1) 6,500 euros for restoration of "Sardana" a statue of Montjuic.
2) A point wifi Ibiza square, which should cost about rental tax of airspace over the use of satellite and infrastructure telecomunicaciones..no is the value.
3) Restoration of the castle of Torre Baro, to be visited and money ... as citizens of nearby Nou Barris, the neighbors are calling the attention of Trias by mass evictions ....
4) 2,000,000 euros to restore the manor of Portabella, Sant Andreu ...
5) The Sisters of the Lamb, a convent in poblenou in a place that was believed would make a shelter or soup kitchen ...
Why do we need in the city a private and citizen hermeticamento installed in a location that is public?
These people should be in the mountains ... want to be separated socially!
This I have seen at a glance in the journal ... what more there will be in Barcelona things we do not know because we hide it?
Not to mention the problem of people who are victims of electronic harassment with electromagnetic weapons. My made me mobbing property in Vilanova, condemning me if she reported being diagnosed paranoid schizophrenic and I would destroy any chance of being a respected citizen occupationally and socially accepted ...
ARE SHOWING A WEALTHY CATALAN EMOTION OF GREED, THE PEOPLE PROTEST IS BUSY IN THE INJUSTICE THAT THE GOVERNMENT MAKES ...
What would happen if we separate it from Spain?
The poorest region is the most tax-free zone and houses ... They want to use the land for ESTATE SPECULATION.
http://ccaa.elpais.com/.../03/catalunya/1415001317_358514.html

9143167462?profile=original

Read more…

Dear All - please find attached some articles about electronic torture, abuse and experimentation, and organised stalking.

Posted by JOHN FINCH on November 11, 2014 at 11:41pm

send me an email to mcmailteam@gmail.com and I will send you the articles

Dear Torture Victims & Friends

 Please find attached some articles about electronic torture, abuse and experimentation, and organised stalking.
Please read these articles to get a real understanding of how horrific, cruel and bizarre these tortures and experimentations are – many of them continuing 24/7 year-in-year-out.
As long ago as 1994 in Montreux, Switzerland the International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC raised the issue of Psychotronic or Directed-Energy weapons, also at the Geneva Forum in 2002, and also in 2009 at the 5th European Symposium on Non-Lethal Weapons and at the European Conference and at other conferences and meetings.
In January 1999, the European Parliament passed a resolution where it calls “ for an international convention introducing a global ban on all development and deployment of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings. It is our conviction that this ban can not be implemented without the global pressure of the informed general public on the governments. Our major objective is to get across to the general public the real threat which these weapons represent for human rights and democracy and to apply pressure on the governments and parliaments around the world to enact legislature which would prohibit the use of these devices to both government and private organisations as well as individuals.”  (Plenary sessions/Europarliament, 1999)
In October 2001, Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich introduced a bill to the House of Representatives which, it was hoped would be extremely important in the fight to expose and stop psycho-electronic mind control experimentation on involuntary, non-consensual citizens. The Bill was referred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services and International Relations. In the original bill a ban was sought on ‘exotic weapons’ including electronic, psychotronic or information weapons, chemtrails, particle beams, plasmas, electromagnetic radiation, extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation, or mind control technologies. Despite the inclusion of a prohibition of the basing of weapons in space, and the use of weapons to destroy objects or damage objects in space, there is no mention in the revised bill of any of the aforementioned mind-invasive weaponry, nor of the use of satellite or radar or other energy based technology for deploying or developing technology designed for deployment against the minds of human beings. (Space Preservation Act, 2002)
Please be assured that for years these weapons have been used to terribly torture and abuse victims all over the world.

Some of our ELECTRONIC TORTURE, ABUSE AND EXPERIMENTATION CASES detail the most extreme and totalitarian violations of human rights in human history, including the most horrendous psychological tortures, rapes, sexual abuse, physical assaults, surgical mutilations, ‘mind control’, and other mental and physical mutilations.
Among other things the perpetrators of these crimes can place the human subject under continuous surveillance no matter where he/she is; they can monitor the human brain, including thoughts, reactions, motor commands, auditory events and visual images; they can continuously alter consciousness, introduce voices, noises, other disturbances, commands, images and "dreams" into the brain; and they can directly abuse, torture and hit bodies - including performing advanced medical procedures - from remote locations. The technology they are using is so advanced that it allows the controller(s) to see through the eyes of the targeted individual, essentially seeing whatever the victim sees.

Many of us are being tortured and abused in these ways 24 hours a day, 7 days a week – year in year out.

These are extreme and monstrous CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY - indescribably terrible in themselves - coupled with the ORWELLIAN secrecy and denial of any support at all that we are experiencing, makes them even more horrendous and monstrous.
We have contacted most Governments, Security/Intelligence Agencies, Religious Organisations, International Organizations, Human Rights Organizations, Universities, Scientific and other Institutions, and the International Media all over the world - over and over and over again – and have had our appeals for assistance, protection and/or publicity almost completely ignored and/or suppressed.

Some TARGETED INDIVIDUALS have been attempting to gain assistance, protection and/or publicity about these crimes since the 1990s - and even earlier - this extends as far back into the history of illegal ‘scientific and medical’ testing and experimentation as MKULTRA, COINTELPRO and the DUPLESSIS ORPHANS - and further.

We are still collecting CASE SUMMARIES from TARGETED INDIVIDUALS all over the world, and we have also advised them to send them to you - “THE SELECTED WITNESSES” - TO WITNESS, RECORD AND OPPOSE so that :-

 A. We can be sure that as many people as possible know about these horrendous crimes.
B. We can be sure that these AUTHORITIES and ORGANISATIONS are either trying to uphold the rule of National, International and Human Rights Law, and that we will, sooner or later, be protected by these laws.

C. Or that we can be sure these AUTHORITIES and ORGANISATIONS are complicit and/or acquiescent to these CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY and that National, International and Human Rights Law no longer apply - in which case our task will be to get the rule of these laws restored.

Later these records should become an information source - such as the INTERNATIONAL TRACING OFFICE set up to record the fates and whereabouts of Jews (and others?) after WW11. The information collected can then be used by the appropriate people for LEGAL, MEDICAL, WELFARE, HISTORICAL etc. records.

As well as being illegal the crimes being committed against us are contrary to the Principles and Values of all the major religions and ethical systems - so we will also be demonstrating to all of these people and AUTHORITIES AND ORGANISATIONS the huge disconnect between their professed Principles and Values and the reality. We will be showing their monstrous Doublespeak Doublethink Doubledo ignorance, stupidity and/or hypocrisy.

 It is no exaggeration to say our cases are as horrendous and urgent as people fleeing Nazi or Pol Pot concentration camps – specifically Dr Mengele-type torturers and butchers.
PLEASE ASSIST US URGENTLY!!
Yours in the search for openness and respect for universal human rights
John Finch, 5/8 Kemp St, Thornbury, Vic 3071, Australia, TEL: 0424009627
EMAIL: tijohnfinch@gmail.com, MCmailteam@gmail.com
FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/john.finch.16547?ref=profile

 TARGETED INDIVIDUAL and a member of THE WORLDWIDE CAMPAIGN AGAINST ELECTRONIC TORTURE, ABUSE AND EXPERIMENTATION

Read more…

NEWS ABOUT OUR COMPLAINT TO THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT - ICC

Posted by JOHN FINCH on November 11, 2014 at 11:34pm

Dear All

NEWS ABOUT OUR COMPLAINT TO THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT - ICC
We had over 100 victims and supporters send petitions, information and/or their torture and abuse case summaries to the ICC.

And that’s just the number who have told me – hopefully many more sent things without telling me about it.

So now we can be sure, at least, that the ICC knows that these crimes are really going on and that there is a problem.

So does The International Committee of the Red Cross – ICRC, The United Nations High Commissioner For Human Rights – OHCHR and The Council of Europe – COE.

Thanks for all your participation and help – we just have to keep trying.

Please participate in the future email activisms I will send you.

PLEASE CONTACT US FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:-
Yours in the search for openness and respect for universal human rights
John Finch, 5/8 Kemp St, Thornbury, Vic 3071, Australia, TEL: 0424009627
EMAIL: tijohnfinch@gmail.com,MCmailteam@gmail.com
FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/john.finch.16547?ref=profile
GROUP FORUM:      https://peacepink.ning.com/

TARGETED INDIVIDUALand a member of THE WORLDWIDE CAMPAIGN AGAINST ELECTRONIC TORTURE, ABUSE AND EXPERIMENTATION



Read more…

INJUNCTION

Posted by silvia miras sanchez on November 11, 2014 at 12:08pm

I DEMAND AN INJUNCTION AS VICTIM TO SUFFER embarrassment PSYCHIC POSSESSION BECAUSE OF MY LEGAL USUFRUCTUARY PACIFICA, THE ROMAN LAW POSSESSION legalized .... And we condemn slaves qeu for duty due must pay tithes, taxes, or in this case the operation of my cognitive system to an unknown usufructuary.
Prevarication and ENJOYMENT OF HUMAN COGNITIVE SYSTEM WITH SPECULATIVE PURPOSES.
Trillions of people are working very hard with human biological material to determine the modus operandi of human psychic impulses in relation to everyday life, to create a computer language based on Cognitive HUMAN SIMULATION, many human flesh is needed to quantify behavior and ensure TOTAL CONTROL CREATIVE HUMAN THOUGHTS.
You need to create a perfect program as God, to govern human behavior remotely before PHYSICALLY be revealed, as in the movie minority report.
How? With COMPUTERS EVOLUTIVA..que react like lightning before we can process completely unwanted thought and turn it into action.

The individually targeted are hoping Congress Brussels on 20
November to let it be known that we are victims of electronic harassment psychotronic.
http://www.covertharassmentconference.com/

Read more…