Beam weapons almost ready for battle

Directed energy could revolutionize warfare, expert says

 AFRL

A laser fires from space toward Earth in this artistic rendering.

The Air Force Research Laboratory’s Directed LOS ALAMOS, N.M. — There is a new breed of weaponry fast approaching — and at the speed of light, no less. They are labeled "directed-energy weapons," and they may well signal a revolution in military hardware — perhaps more so than the atomic bomb.

Directed-energy weapons take the form of lasers, high-powered microwaves and particle beams. Their adoption for ground, air, sea, and space warfare depends not only on using the electromagnetic spectrum, but also upon favorable political and budgetary wavelengths too.

That’s the outlook of J. Douglas Beason, author of the recently published book "The E-Bomb: How America’s New Directed Energy Weapons Will Change the Way Wars Will Be Fought in the Future." Beason previously served on the White House staff working for the president’s science adviser under both the Bush and Clinton administrations.

After more than two decades of research, the United States is on the verge of deploying a new generation of weapons that discharge beams of energy, such as the Airborne Laser and the Active Denial System, as well as the Tactical High Energy Laser, or THEL.

"History has shown that, without investment in high technology, fighting the next war will be done using the 'last war' type of technique," Beason told Space.com. Putting money into basic and long-range research is critical, Beason said, adding: "You can’t always schedule breakthroughs."

A leading expert in directed-energy research for 26 years, Beason is also director of threat reduction here at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. However, he noted that he was expressing his own views rather than the policy of the laboratory, the Defense Department or the Energy Department.

Ripe for transformation? Though considerable work has been done in lasers, high-power microwaves and other directed-energy technologies, weaponization is still an ongoing process.

For example, work is continuing in the military’s Airborne Laser program. It utilizes a megawatt-class, high-energy chemical oxygen iodine laser toted skyward aboard a modified Boeing 747-400 aircraft. Purpose of the program is to enable the detection, tracking and destruction of ballistic missiles in the boost phase, or powered part of their flight.

 

Similarly, testing of the U.S. Army’s Tactical High Energy Laser in White Sands, N.M., has shown the ability of heating high-flying rocket warheads, blasting them with enough energy to make them self-detonate. THEL uses a high-energy, deuterium fluoride chemical laser. A mobile THEL also demonstrated the ability to kill multiple mortar rounds.

 

Then there’s Active Denial Technology — a non-lethal way to use millimeter-wave electromagnetic energy to stop, deter and turn back an advancing adversary. This technology, supported by the U.S. Marines, uses a beam of millimeter waves to heat a foe’s skin, causing severe pain without damage, and making the adversary flee the scene.

Beason also pointed to new exciting research areas underway at the Los Alamos National Laboratory: Free-electron laser work with the Navy and a new type of directed energy that operates in the terahertz region.

Niche for new technology While progress in directed-energy is appreciable, Beason sees two upfront problems in moving the technology forward. One issue has to do with "convincing the warfighter that there’s a niche for this new type of weapon," and the other relates to making sure these new systems are not viewed as a panacea to solve all problems. "They are only another tool," he said.

 

 Northrop Grumman

This is a conceptual look at putting a solid-state laser on an armored ground combat vehicle for potential use in the U.S. military’s Future Combat Systems program.

Looming even larger is the role of those who acquire new weapons. "The U.S. could put ourselves in a very disastrous position if we allow our acquisition officials to be non-technically competent," Beason explained.

 

Over the decades, Beason said that the field of directed-energy has had its share of "snake-oil salesmen", as well as those advocates who overpromised. "It wasn’t ready for prime time."

At present, directed-energy systems "are barely limping along with enough money just to prove that they can work," Beason pointed out. Meanwhile, huge slugs of money are being put into legacy-type systems to keep them going.

"It’s a matter of priority," Beason said. The time is now to identify high-payoff, directed-energy projects for the smallest amounts of money, he said.

 

Unknown unknowns In Beason’s view, Active Denial Technology, the Airborne Laser program and the THEL project, as well as supporting technologies such as relay mirrors, are all works in progress that give reason for added support and priority funding.

"I truly believe that as the Airborne Laser goes, so goes the rest of the nation’s directed-energy programs. Right now, it’s working on the margin. I believe that there are still ‘unknown unknowns’ out there that are going to occur in science and technology. We think we have the physics defined. We think we have the engineering defined. But something always goes wrong … and we’re working too close at the margin," Beason said.

Stepwise demonstration programs that spotlight directed-energy weapon systems are needed, Beason noted. Such in-the-field displays could show off greater beam distance-to-target runs, mobility of hardware, ease-of-operation, battlefield utility and other attributes

 

Directed-energy technologies can offer a range of applications, from botching up an enemy’s electronics to performing "dial-up" destructive strikes at the speed of light with little or no collateral damage.

Beason said he has a blue-sky idea of his own, which he tags "the voice from heaven." By tuning the resonance of a laser onto Earth’s ionosphere, you can create audible frequencies. Like some boom box in the sky, the laser-produced voice could bellow from above down to the target below: "Put down your weapons."

Relay mirrors Regarding use of directed-energy space weapons, Beason advised that "we’ll eventually see it."

However, present-day systems are far too messy. Most high-powered chemical lasers — in the megawatt

class — require onboard fuels and oxidizers to crank out the amount of energy useful for strategic applications. Stability of such a laser system rooted in space is also wanting.

On the other hand, Beason said he expected to see the rise of more efficient lasers — especially solid-state laser systems. "What breakthroughs are needed … I’m not sure. Eventually, I think it’s going to happen, but it is going to be a generation after the battlefield lasers."

Shooting beams "through space" is another matter, Beason quickly added. Space-based relay mirrors — even high-altitude airships equipped with relay mirrors — can direct ground-based or air-based laser beams nearly around the world, he said.

"So you’re using space … exploiting it. But you are going through space to attack anywhere on Earth," Beason said.

History lesson Late last year, speaking before the Heritage Foundation in Washington, Beason told his audience that laser energy, the power sources and beam control, as well as knowledge about how laser beams interact with Earth’s atmosphere, are quite mature technologies that are ready for the shift into front-line warfare status.

"The good news is that directed energy exists. Directed energy is being tested, and within a few years directed energy is going to be deployed upon the battlefield," Beason reported. "But the bad news is that acquisition policies right now in this nation are one more gear toward evolutionary practices rather than revolutionary practices."

"Visionaries win wars … and not bureaucrats. We’ve seen this through history," Beason observed.

http://www.howvc.com/Html/technology/frontier/570765251166.html

美试验148公里远距离无线传输太阳能

作者：孝文   来源：新浪科技

发表时间:2008年09月27日

http://sztqb.sznews.com/html/2011-05/30/content_1593542.htm

2023年：仿真“人脑”问世 这一研究项目将为疑难老年病治疗带来突破

工程负责人瑞士神经学家亨利·马克拉姆。 　　▲３Ｄ人脑神经元活动模拟图。　　了解神经元之间的沟通规则非常重要。单个神经元不随意沟通，而是寻求目标明确的沟通伙伴。虽然每个神经元都是独一无二的，但是，研究人员已经发现不同大脑的线路有着共同的模式。   “人脑工程”研究小组希望在计算机上制造一个完整人类大脑的模型。工程负责人瑞士神经学家亨利·马克拉姆称人脑为“神奇的机器”。他们正在向欧盟为该工程申请拨款１０亿欧元。工程预计在２０２３年前完成。“人脑工程”将会在治疗帕金森氏症等疑难杂症、研发新超级计算机和智能机器人等领域取得重大突破

http://ask.148365.com/liaoning/shenyang/1213334.html

http://www.yesky.com/22/206522.shtml

http://www.chinanews.com/gn/2011/08-05/3236974.shtml

　　中科院中国现代化研究中心最新完成、也是第六次科技革命首部科研论著《第六次科技革命的战略机遇》当天在北京首发。何传启说，在过去500年里，世界上先后发生五次科技革命，包括两次科学革命和三次技术革命，第一次科技革命是16～17世纪的近代物理学诞生，第二次是18世纪中后期的蒸汽机和机械革命，第三次是19世纪中后期的电气和运输革命，第四次是20世纪初的相对论和量子论革命，第五次是20世纪中后期的电子和信息革命。

　　这位首提第二次现代化理论的青年学者称，带有某种“科学猜想”性质的第六次科技革命大约在2020～2050年间发生，科学角度，它可能是一次新生物学革命；技术角度，可能是一次“创生和再生革命”；产业角度，可能是一次“仿生和再生革命”；文明角度，可能是一次“再生和永生革命”。如果说，前五次科技革命重点是人类认识自然、改造自然和征服自然，那么，第六次科技革命重点将是人类认识自己、改变自己和改进自己，全面提高生活质量，提高人类可持续性和适应宇航时代的需要。

　　何传启认为，第六次科技革命10个可能标志包括信息转换器、人格信息包、两性智能人、合成生命、人体再生、神经再生、体外子宫、耦合论、整合论、永生论。10大主要方向将分别是整合和创生生物学、思维和神经生物学、生命和再生工程、信息和仿生工程、纳米和仿生工程、生命科学的相关学科、材料科学和生物材料、地球与环境科学、绿色超级制造、绿色超级运输和新能源。

　　“可以预期，第六次科技革命，不仅将改变人类自己，而且将改变世界”，它有可能带来10个革命性变化——

　　学习革命：信息转换器进入学校，人脑和电脑直接信息交流，告别应试教育；大学革命：大学转变职能，从教育机构转变为科研机构；家庭革命：两性智能人进入家庭，家庭和性模式多样化；生殖革命：“体外子宫”实用化，实现“体外生殖”和“定制生殖”；再生革命：人有“四条命”——自然人、网络人、仿生人和再生人；产业革命：仿生、再生和创生技术产业化；人类解放：绿色超级制造系统大量代替人的体力和脑力劳动；生活方式：创新和休闲成为人们主要活动；国际战争：战争技术和目标从肉体攻击、信息攻击到神经攻击；国际公平：信息转换器普及、知识鸿沟缩小，国际贫富差距可能缩小。

　　过去500年，中国失去参与前四次科技革命的机会，在第五次科技革命中表现平平且收获不多。何传启建议在中国建立第六次科技革命的响应机制，从而有可能在第六次科技革命中创造一个“中国奇迹”。(完)

Downloadable at : (395KB, pdf format)

http://www.resistance2010.com/forum/attachment/download?id=3228704%3AUploadedFi35%3A26453

 CIA SECRET WEAPONS, ANDREW STARK (WEAPONRY SPECIALIST, PSEUDONYM)

Downloadable at :  (pdf format, 18KB)

http://www.resistance2010.com/forum/attachment/download?id=3228704%3AUploadedFi35%3A26452

THE CIA'S SECRET WEAPONS SYSTEMS by Andrew Stark Exploding wine bottles, guns constructed out of pipes, bullets made of teeth, aspirin explosives: they sound like props from a second-rate spy story. Horrifyingly enough, they are real. The CIA has spent a great deal of its time-- and your money--developing countless bizarre weapons for assassination, sabotage, and mass destruction. If that's news to you, it's because the CIA doesn't want these products, some of which are quite easy to put together, to fall into the "wrong hands." As for whether they are in the right hands now--judge for yourself. The CIA has developed many exotic and sophisticated devices intended for use in interrogation, sabotage, and assassination. These weapons are necessary--if you grant that what the CIA itself does is necessary. If the CIA wants to eliminate a key KGB agent operating in Hungary, it faces certain problems. It would be virtually impossible to slip a deadly weapon, such as a gun or bomb, past Hungarian customs officials. Thus, the CIA assassin must assemble his weapon from commonly obtainable materials after he crosses the border. The CIA agent might decide to construct a urea nitrate explosive, commonly known as a urine bomb. This weapon is quite deadly, easily exploded, and consists primarily of nitric acid and urine. The urine bomb is one of literally hundreds of murderous weapons in the CIA arsenal. "The New York Times" of September 26, 1975 revealed the existence of guns that shoot cobra-venom darts. Then there was the shoe polish compound intended to make Fidel Castro's beard fall out, so that he would lose his "charisma." And CIA laboratories in Fort Monmouth, New Jersey developed the famous rifle that shoots around corners. Some CIA weapons are designed to kill many people--deadly germs can be released in subways; others are intended to kill a single, specific individual--the Borgia ring contains deadly poison to be slipped into a victim's drink; and still others are standard weapons supplied for such missions as overthrowing the Allende government in Chile in 1973. The information about CIA weapons that you will read in this article generally has not been made public before. It was not intended to be. But your tax dollars pay for these devices; it is your right to know about them. There is a booklet, written in 1977 and distributed to a select group of U.S. mercenaries, titled "CIA Improvised Sabotage Devices." This instructional guidebook, part of "the Combat Bookshelf," was published by Desert Publications, P.O. Box 22005, Phoenix, Arizona 85028. If you want to know how the CIA turns a cigar box into an explosive that can destroy a 10,000-gallon capacity storage tank, then "CIA Improvised Sabotage Devices" is what you should read. You will need it if you want to build the "Water-Drip Electric Delay," a bomb that requires little more than wood scrap, a tin can, and a battery. The "Pocket Watch Electric Delay" requires little more than a watch, a screw, and a battery. The "Mousetrap Electric Release" is another bomb, this one requiring a mousetrap, a trip wire, a battery, and little else. It is described as "an excellent device to use with bazooka rockets against trucks, tanks, or locomotives." The "Chemical

Instantaneous Initiator" is made from a sugar-chlorate mix and is effective in sabotaging trains. The "Martini Glass Shaped Charge" is a bomb that also can be made out of a beer can. You might want to try to construct the "Vehicle Booby Trap." The "Potassium Chlorate and Sugar Igniter" and the "Sawdust, Moth Flakes, and Oil Incendiary" can be made with only what you see in their titles. For these and more than fifty other CIA devices, step-by-step instructions on how to make them and illustrations of what they should look like when completed are given. Turn a wine bottle into a bomb. Build a land-mine rocket. Manufacture napalm in your basement. Even the simple how-tos of causing a dust explosion can be found in "CIA Improvised Sabotage Devices." Why is the CIA so deeply involved in sabotage techniques? The CIA might think it is in this country's interest to delay scientific work being done by another nation. Or, the CIA might want to disrupt a nation's economy in the hope that the resulting chaos will lead to civil unrest and the overthrow of the existing government (some of this actually happened in Chile). The original John Rockefeller used such tactics against his competitors. He simply had their refineries blown up. Another pamphlet the CIA would not like you to see is titled "How to Kill," written by John Minnery, edited by Robert Brown and Peder Lund, and published by Paladin Press, Box 1307, Boulder, Colorado 80306. The reason the CIA would prefer that you not see this eighty-eight-page pamphlet, which is unavailable at bookstores and newsstands, is because it contains a number of "ingenious" methods of doing what the title says. Also, Paladin Press, which published a book called "OSS Sabotage and Demolition Manual," is widely regarded by journalists as an organization with close ties to mercenary groups and the CIA. Paladin Press doesn't want you to know that, but how else could they have published the "OSS Sabotage and Demolition Manual?" The Office of Strategic Services was the precursor of today's CIA. This writer's call to Colorado yielded the following conversation: "How could you publish the "OSS Sabotage and Demolition Manual," I asked Peter Lund, editor and publisher of Paladin Press, "if your organization, at the least, was not dealing with former OSS agents? And what about "How to Kill?" "I don't talk to journalists," Lund said. "You're called the Paladin Press. You must publish books. Can I order them?" "No." "Why not? You're a publisher, aren't you?" "We're afraid our publications might fall into the wrong hands." "What are the right hands?" I asked. "I don't talk to journalists." "Have you ever heard of Desert Publications?" I asked. "A fine outfit," Lund said. "If they recommend you, I'll send you our material." "That's my problem," I said. "They don't seem to have a phone number." "Well, they're a good group." "Listen," I said, "wasn't your group, and Desert Publications besides, involved in CIA mercenary activity in Africa?" "I don't know anything about that." "Were you in the Special Forces?" "July 1967 to July 1968 in Vietnam." "Were you CIA?" "I was MACV [Military Armed Forces Command Vietnam]."

"You weren't affiliated with CIA?" "I didn't say that." "What do you say?" "We did joint operations with CIA on the Phoenix Program." "Wasn't that a murder operation?" "No. It was snatching people." The Phoenix Program was designed for a job that the CIA euphemistically described as "eliminating the Viet Cong infrastructure." In reality, it was a rampant reign of terror run out of CIA headquarters at Langley, Virginia. Former CIA director William Colby later termed the program "effective." The Phoenix Program was a naked murder campaign, as proved by every realistic report, ranging from the Bertrand Russell Tribunal to the Dellums Committee to admissions by CIA agents themselves. The program killed--and *none* of these killings occurred in combat--18,000 people, mostly women and children. But what about Peder Lund, editor and publisher of Paladin Press? The book he edited and published, "How to Kill," outlined a surfeit of murder methods, horrific techniques of causing people to die. For example: "Without getting too deeply into the realm of the bizarre," wrote John Minnery, the author of "How to Kill" as he proceeded to just that, "a specially loaded bullet made from a human tooth (bicuspid) could be fired under the jaw or through the mouth into the head. The tooth is a very hard bone, and its enamel shell would allow it to penetrate into the brain. The intention here is also to hide the cause of death because the examiner in his search for a projectile will disregard bone fragments." One last example from "How to Kill" should give you the flavor of the book: Lesson Nine: Hot Wire "Essentially, the weapon is an electrified grid in the urinal basin. This can take the form of a screen cover for the drain or a metal grill. If the urinal is completely porcelain, the screen must be added by the assassin. The drain cover is connected to the electrical system of the washroom by means of an insulated cord that is hidden behind the plumbing. "What happens when the subject uses the urinal should be obvious now. The subject's urine, which is a salty liquid and a perfect conductor of electricity, makes contact with the charged grid, and the shock will kill him." This reporter's investigation revealed that the "Hot Wire" was child's play compared to certain other CIA weapons devices. For instance, I was able to obtain Volumes One and Two of the "CIA Black Book" on improvised munitions, volumes that are stamped "for official use only" on almost every page. It is obvious why the CIA would like these books to remain secret. With elaborate instructions, they describe how to make high explosives from aspirin, how to construct a nail grenade, and how to turn a Coke bottle into a bomb. Described in detail in the "Black Book" is the previously mentioned urea nitrate explosive, or, as it is known to the pros, "the piss bomb." Instructions for the preparation of this weapon assure the maker that animal urine will do as well as human; the important thing is to have ten cups of it, boil it down to one cup, and mix it with the nitric acid. Also described in the "Black Book" is how to construct a pipe

pistol, which, as the name indicates, is a gun constructed out of a pipe. Other weapons include a cooking syringe filled with poison that can be stabbed into "the subject's" stomach; a cyanide gas pistol; a throat cutter gauntlet knife (razor sharp and only an inch or so in length); and a mixture of fertilizer and aluminum powder that can be made into a powerful bomb. Why build murder weapons out of such weird material? Is the CIA insane? No. In its own way, the whole thing is perfectly logical. The pamphlet "How to Kill" explained it all: "As most of these devices are homemade, this precludes the possibility of their being traced. They are, in effect, `sanitized' and perfect for assassinations, where weapons are prohibited, or where customs in the hostile country are stringent, so these can be made from local materials." Being a contract killer for the CIA is not all roses. You cannot kill in just any way. A number of attempts have been made on Fidel Castro's life--some with the CIA and the Mafia cooperating--and some of them may have failed because of restrictions imposed on the potential assassins. It would be unacceptable for Castro's murder to be laid at the door of the CIA. This would make Castro a martyr in the eyes of his countrymen. Thus, a method that would suggest death by natural causes must be found. Abundant speculation and considerable evidence suggest that the CIA or some other government agency arranged for the "natural" deaths of David Ferrie, Jack Ruby, George De Mohrenschildt, and other potential witnesses into the assassination of John Kennedy. Some methods of killing, like the injection of an air bubble into the bloodstream, will often go unnoticed by medical examiners. Another hard-to-trace method of killing is to mail a snake to the victim. This is known as killing by long distance. A disadvantage to this method is that the snake might bite an innocent third party who just happens to open the package. The advantage is that once the snake has struck, the evidence can simply slither away. Sometimes, as the CIA knows, killing has to be done at close range. For this purpose, a valuable weapon is the ice pick with a blood arrester attached. The blood arrester is a cloth wrapped near the tip of the ice pick. When the pick is shoved into the victim, the spurting blood is absorbed by the blood arrester. People who see the victim fall will probably think he has had a heart attack. While the onlookers try to help the victim, the assassin uses this valuable ten or fifteen seconds to escape unnoticed. Often it is advisable to use what is called in the trade a "quiet weapon." Silenced weapons can include pistols, rifles, and even machine guns. Poison is a quiet killer. Here is a partial list of the poisons the CIA has become expert at administering: oil of bitter almonds; ant paste; cadmium, used in vapor form, and death is delayed four hours; radiator cleaner, also causing a delayed death; Cantharides (Spanish Fly); ethyl mercury; and freon, heated by a flame. These poisons and many others are listed in "How to Kill." The author then cautions the reader: "Unless otherwise stated, these poisons are either to be injected into the subject, or taken orally by him by adding it to his food. Use common sense in the application of these potions and, if possible, double the O.D. necessary." W.H. Bowart, in his book, "Operation Mind Control" described the CIA's use of drugs: "In 1953, the CIA made plans to purchase ten

kilograms of LSD for use in `drug experiments with animals and human beings.' Since there are more than 10,000 doses in a gram, that meant the CIA wanted 100 million doses. The CIA obviously intended to `corner the market' on LSD so that other countries would not be ahead of the U.S. in their potential for `LSD warfare.'" Dr. Albert Hoffman, an early researcher into the uses of LSD, was horrified by what the CIA was doing: "I had perfected LSD for medical use, not as a weapon. It can make you insane or even kill you if it is not properly used under medical supervision. In any case, the research should be done by medical people and not by soldiers or intelligence agencies." Perhaps the most frightening weapon of all is the one that can be used to alter weather and climate. It was used with considerable success in Vietnam. It slowed troop movements with heavy rains, and it destroyed the rice crop, as well. The danger is that these climatological changes may become permanent, affecting not only enemies of the United States, but also the entire planet. Finally, considerable evidence exists that the United States, through the CIA, employed germ warfare during the Korean War. A number of captured pilots testified that germ warfare was used, but their testimony was dismissed as brainwashing. A Marine Corps colonel named Frank H. Schwable signed a germ warfare confession and, according to W.H. Bowart, "named names, cited missions, described meetings and strategy conferences." Schwable later repudiated his confession. But the charges of germ warfare were taken up in front of the United Nations, and a number of countries believed them. The United States, incidentally, was later charged with using nerve gas in Vietnam. What you have read on these pages is pretty revolting stuff. Yet, if the world ought to be saved from Communism, who can say it is not necessary? One danger, of course, is that these terrible weapons have been introduced into our body politic and have produced strange and terrible fruits on our own native soil. When assassination becomes government policy, when men are trained to kill in every conceivable way, when morality is set aside for a "higher good," can even the President of the United States consider himself safe? Andrew Stark is a pseudonym for a weaponry specialist.

http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/2003-01-23/104208.html

　　基因武器，也称遗传工程武器或DNA武器。它运用先进的遗传工程这一新技术，用类似工程设计的办法，按人们的需要通过基因重组，在一些致病细菌或病毒中接入能对抗普通疫苗或药物的基因，或者在一些本来不会致病的微生物体内接入致病基因而制造成生物武器。

基因武器的使用方法简单多样，可以用人工、飞机、导弹或火炮把经过遗传工程发行过的细菌、细菌昆虫和带有致病基因的微生物，投入它国的主要河流、城市或交通要道，让病毒自然扩散、繁殖，使人、畜在短时间内患上一种无法治疗的疾病，使其在无形战场上静悄悄地丧失战斗力。由于这种武器不易发现且难防难治，一些科学家对它的忧虑远远超过了当年一些核物理学家对原子弹的忧虑。

　　束能武器，这种武器能以陆基、车载、舰载和星载的方式发射，突出特点是射速快，能在瞬间穿透数百公里甚至数千公里外的目标而不留下“硬伤”，尤其对精确制导高技术武器有直接的破坏作用，因此被认为是战术防空、反装甲、光电对抗乃至战略反导、反卫星、反一切航天器的多功能理想武器。目前，这一崭新机理的“束能技术”发展很快，X射线激光器、粒子束武器、高能微波式武器等已走出实验室，准分子激光器、短波长化学激光器、等离子体炮、“材料束”武器等在加速研制中。束能武器中，微波射频武器被誉为“超级明星”，其强电磁干扰能使敌方雷达、通信迷盲混乱，能破坏敌方电子设备中的电路使之失效，发射强热效应可造成人体皮肤烧灼和眼白内障，甚至烧伤致死。

　　次声波武器，是一种能发射20赫以下低频声波即次声波的大功率武器装置。在空中，它能以每小时1200km的速度传播，在水中能以每小时6000km的速度传播，可穿透1.5m厚的混凝土。它虽然难闻其声，却能与人体生理系统产生共振而使人丧失功能。目前研制的次声波武器分神经型和内脏器官型两种，前者能使人神经错乱，癫狂不止；后者能使人周身剧烈不适，进而失去战斗力。由于次声波能穿透建筑物和车辆，因而躲在工事和装甲车里的人员也那里的一切有力量，在波黑战争中美军就曾使用次声发生器发射次声波，几秒钟后使对方大批人员丧失了战斗力。次声波武器已被列为未来战争的重要武器之一。

　　幻觉武器，是运用全息投影技术从空间站向云端或战场上的特定空间投射有关影像、标语、口号的一种激光装置。它的作用是从心理上骚扰、恫吓和瓦解敌军，使之恐惧厌战，继而放弃武器逃离战场。据报道，美国在索马里就曾使用过这种幻觉武器进行了一次投影效应实验，把受难耶稣的巨幅头像投射到风沙迷漫的空中。另外还有动能、智能、超微型、闪电、地震、气象等武器也正在研究中。

无法发放在Videos专栏，这是链接 ：

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tl19ouQCe4E&feature=youtu.be

指的既是人类现今研究包括定向能无器等。

是否属实，请看了自行判断。

The link between the explosion of government neuroscience research and classified cold war/post cold war weapons programs

The new neuroethics conferences have not included military research in their discussions and yet many articles describe weapons which target the nervous system and brain. This summary of 2004 developments, includes the long-term military interest in nonlethal, electromagnetic weapons and human rights expert’s comments on the continuing problem of excessive secrecy. The excessive secrecy prevents evaluation of the new weapons by human rights groups. The Reuters World Service, May 30, 1996, Microwave and acoustic weapons pose new threats, Jim Della-Giacoma reported;

”…There are indications that [electromagnetic weapons] may have adverse affects on the brain,” she [Louise Doswald-Beck, Deputy Head of the legal division of the Geneva-based ICRC(International Committee for the Red Cross)] …Doswald-Beck said all developed countries were doing research on microwave and acoustic weapons. ”The U.S. makes a lot of mention of it in its specialised literature but then they say it’s classified. The same goes with some European countries. The West assumes that Russia’s doing it, but it is kept under wraps,” she said. Doswald-Beck said the ICRC was unable to do the early research on banning microwave and acoustic weapons because they were shrouded in secrecy.

http://mindjustice.org/2005update.htm

http://www.chinareviewnews.com/doc/1015/9/5/2/101595220.html?coluid=61&kindid=1290&docid=101595220&mdate=0211110355

中評社香港2月11日電／澳大利亞科學家發明了一種“思考帽”，對人腦進行微量通電，能夠促進創意思考。
　　
　　科學家指出，戴上這個所謂的“思考帽”（thinking cap）接受一項簡單算術測試的人，其表現顯著加強。在接受這項算術測試的60人當中，戴著“思考帽”作答並完成測試的人，比沒有使用“思考帽”的人多了三倍。

　　聯合早報報道，這個由悉尼大學才智中心（Centre for the Mind）的主任斯奈德教授和博士研究生Richard Chi發明的“思考帽”，一邊壓抑和知識及記憶力有關聯的左腦，一邊刺激進行創意思考的右腦，讓人們思考問題時能夠跳出舊框框。

　　斯奈德說：“你不能在溫書時使用這個儀器，或用它來加強記憶。但如果你想要在思考問題時能夠跳出舊框框，就可把它戴上。”

　　他表示，發明這個儀器的靈感來自那些在意外中腦部受傷的人。這些人在發生意外後左腦受損，但他們的創意卻突然間提高了。

　　斯奈德指出，科學家使用“思考帽”進行研究已長達十年，但這是他們首次用微弱的電流刺激大腦，以便提升人們的思考能力。他說，“思考帽”可在藝術領域和解決問題方面發揮功能。

'Thinking Cap' Designed to Promote Creativity

The new device passes low levels of electricity through the brain to try and help wearers think more clearly.

Thu Feb 10, 2011 08:47 AM ET
Content provided by AFP
( ) Comments | Leave a Comment

Print

Email

THE GIST

• Australian scientists have developed a cap to wear over the head that is meant to promote creativity.
• The cap works by passing low levels of electricity through the brain.
• The goal is to suppress past mental templates to see situations as they really appear.

enlarge

Australian scientists have developed a device that they believe promotes creativity in the brain. Click to enlarge this image.
iStockPhoto

RELATED CONTENT

Can you REALLY tell if your friend is lying to you?

• Does Insomnia Shrink Your Brain?
• Bilingualism Good for the Brain

RELATED TOPICS

• Brain and Central Nervous System
• Brain-Computer Interface
• Deep Brain Stimulation

Scientists in Australia say they are encouraged by initial results of a revolutionary "thinking cap" that aims to promote creativity by passing low levels of electricity through the brain.

The device, which consists of two conductors fastened to the head by a rubber strap, significantly boosted results in a simple arithmetic test, they said.

Three times as many people who wore the "thinking cap" were able to complete the test, compared to those who did not use the equipment. Sixty people took part in total.

Allan Snyder, director of the University of Sydney's Center for the Mind, said the device worked by suppressing the left side of the brain, associated with knowledge, and stimulating the right side, linked to creativity.

"You wouldn't use this to study or to help your memory," Snyder said. "You would use this if you wanted to look at a problem anew.

"If you wanted to look at the world, just briefly, with a child's view, if you wanted to look outside the box."

He said goal was to suppress mental templates gathered through life experiences to help users see problems and situations as they really appear, rather than through the prism of earlier knowledge.

Snyder added that the work was inspired by accident victims who experienced a sudden surge in creativity after damaging the left side of their brains.

"We know that from certain types of brain damage and abnormalities or injuries, people who suddenly have damage to the left temporal lobe will burst out in the arts or other types of creative activities," he said.

Snyder said the device had been in use by scientists for a decade, but this was the first study into how current passing through the brain could amplify insight.

He said the "thinking cap" had potential applications in the arts and problem-solving, although the science remained in its infancy.

"The dream is that one day we may be able to stimulate the brain in a particular way to give you, just momentarily, an unfiltered view of the world," Snyder said

我建议成立世界反精神控制侦缉队

这个队伍目前要拉拢的是精神武器研制科学家，还有手中有精神武器的政府有志人士。

目的是没有立法前，对精神武器的胡乱使用者实行以暴制暴的行动。并且适当的保护受害者。

我希望这些人能关注这件事情，越来越多的加入进来。

目前可能只能从精神世界里呼唤这些有志人士加入。不知道网络能不能送达得到。可是如果你们收到了，无论什么方式，请用一切方式联络我，然后快速的实行起来。

我想可能效果是缓慢的，不过是对未来有实质性进展的。

 《凤凰网》

http://news.ifeng.com/world/news/detail_2011_08/01/8089310_0.shtml

【美国《科学新闻》周刊网站7月2 9日报道】题：脑电波带来快速刹车———司机们只需产生念头就能使车辆停止

在高速行驶的轿车里，大脑踩闸的速度要比脚来得快。昨天在网络刊物《神经工程学杂志》上，研究人员报告说，一门新技术依靠表明想要踩刹车的脑电波，能够节省关键的几毫秒反应时间。

这项研究为汽车技术中帮助司机的一种不断增长的趋势做出了贡献。虽然这项新的大脑信号技术可能最终会带来紧急刹车方面的改进，但它目前还没有做好上路准备。

弗吉尼亚州费尔法克斯的乔治·梅森大学的认知神经科学家拉贾·帕拉苏拉曼说：“作为一项基础科学研究，我对它印象深刻。我就是认为还有许多工作需要做。”

在这项研究中，德国柏林理工学院的电脑科学家斯蒂芬·豪费及其同事在参加者驾驶一个轿车模拟器的时候测量了脑电波的变化。

参加者驾车速度为每小时60英里左右，在对面交通拥挤的情况下跟随前面一辆车行驶在一段弯路上。前面的车经常踩刹车，因此参加者要么不得不照着做，要么追尾。

对大多数司机来说，前面的车停止和他们自己踩闸之间的时滞为700毫秒左右。这段时滞期间，一些神经特征显而易见，它们可能是早期迹象，表明司机想要刹车。

豪费说：“我们的做法是在司机能够实际采取行动之前了解他的意图。

这就是神经活动派上用场的地方。”

豪费及其同事所设计的系统察觉并破解这些神经状况。该小组报告说，在电脑模拟中，该系统———它包括腿部肌肉电流活动所提供的肌电图计量数据———的工作速度要比没有帮助的司机快大约130毫秒。对于行驶速度为每小时60英里的轿车来说，这一时差换算为大约3.7米的停车距离，即一些小型轿车的长度。

在最佳驾驶情况下，该系统的误刹车率为每小时将近两次。帕拉苏拉曼说，如果该系统要变得有用的话，这一“虚惊”比率就得降下来。他说：“我们都厌恶没有危险时警报响起。对大多数人来说，哪怕是1%的‘虚惊’比率都是无法接受的。”

美研究用脑电波代替脚更快刹车 《新华网》

http://news.xinhuanet.com/world/2011-08/01/c_121754558.htm

　　在高速行驶的轿车里，大脑踩闸的速度要比脚来得快。昨天在网络刊物《神经工程学杂志》上，研究人员报告说，一门新技术依靠表明想要踩刹车的脑电波，能够节省关键的几毫秒反应时间。

　　这项研究为汽车技术中帮助司机的一种不断增长的趋势做出了贡献。虽然这项新的大脑信号技术可能最终会带来紧急刹车方面的改进，但它目前还没有做好上路准备。

　　弗吉尼亚州费尔法克斯的乔治·梅森大学的认知神经科学家拉贾·帕拉苏拉曼说：“作为一项基础科学研究，我对它印象深刻。我就是认为还有许多工作需要做。”

　　在这项研究中，德国柏林理工学院的电脑科学家斯蒂芬·豪费及其同事在参加者驾驶一个轿车模拟器的时候测量了脑电波的变化。

　　参加者驾车速度为每小时60英里左右，在对面交通拥挤的情况下跟随前面一辆车行驶在一段弯路上。前面的车经常踩刹车，因此参加者要么不得不照着做，要么追尾。

　　对大多数司机来说，前面的车停止和他们自己踩闸之间的时滞为700毫秒左右。这段时滞期间，一些神经特征显而易见，它们可能是早期迹象，表明司机想要刹车。

　　豪费说：“我们的做法是在司机能够实际采取行动之前了解他的意图。

　　这就是神经活动派上用场的地方。”

　　豪费及其同事所设计的系统察觉并破解这些神经状况。该小组报告说，在电脑模拟中，该系统———它包括腿部肌肉电流活动所提供的肌电图计量数据———的工作速度要比没有帮助的司机快大约130毫秒。对于行驶速度为每小时60英里的轿车来说，这一时差换算为大约3.7米的停车距离，即一些小型轿车的长度。

　　在最佳驾驶情况下，该系统的误刹车率为每小时将近两次。帕拉苏拉曼说，如果该系统要变得有用的话，这一“虚惊”比率就得降下来。他说：“我们都厌恶没有危险时警报响起。对大多数人来说，哪怕是1%的‘虚惊’比率都是无法接受的。”  

Monsieur le Président de La République de France,

avec tout le respect que je vous doit et félicitation pour votre boulot, je pense qu'il y a des choses encore à faire comme par exemple bannir l'utilisation de technologie du Mind Control, je crois qu'il faut revoir les choses, les citoyens de France n'ont pas besoin d'avoir de puces électroniques dans leur corps pour " contrôler leur esprits ", il y a des gens qui souffrent comme moi. On aimerait avoir des réponses, des explications sur ce sujet. C'est inadmissible, de vouloir utiliser les nouvelles technologies pour manipuler encore plus l'homme, c'est un crime contre l'humanité !

J'espère que monsieur le président actuel fera les choses nécessaires et cela par devoir d'agir rapidement sur la question, comme solution je pense qu'il faudrait ouvrir des centres de détection pour savoir qui est abusé de ces technologies, des hôpitaux spéciaux qui agiront en conséquence, il faudrait aussi des scanners plus puissant qui permettrait de détecter si il y a des nano-puces ou je ne sais quoi dans le corps de l'homme qui se dit victime, cela ne doit pas rester un secret, nous sommes pour que les gens soient libres en démocratie, et permettre ainsi d'avoir leur propre opinion et leur vie privée d'être respecté.

Pourquoi pas un téléphone vert pour savoir si "oui ou non" , vous avez des caractéristiques ou des symptômes de " mind control " ? Genre, acouphène sévère, rêve contrôlés par une machine, je dis un peu au hasard, mais ce n'est pas le fruit de mon imagination, cela est vrai pour des sujets comme moi,  qui souffre en silence depuis maintenant 3 ans, c'est une pourriture !

Alors, je vous expliques rapidement monsieur le président Nicolas Sarkozy, on ne peut pas travailler car on est tout le temps fatigué etc. On ne peut même pas reprendre les études car notre esprit est parasité par ces implants, j'ignore comment ils sont d'ailleurs ces implants, je ne les ai même pas vu, mais faut pas nous prendre pour des idiots, il y a des faits qui sont là, des gens qui agissent dans le secret défense pour agir sur leur propre compte, ils détournent de l'argent, fraudent, font de la criminalité pour réduire au silence les gens.

Mais ça ne peut pas perdurer longtemps, quand l'information circule tout le monde est au courant, et les protagonistes sont mis à la sellette.

Bref, nous pouvons plus continuer dans ce monde d'ignorant où il y a un holocauste invisible, silencieux, grâce à des puces, des bio-technologies et j'en passe les meilleures inventions de ces pauvres connards d'imbéciles de scientifiques qui pensent qu'à leur minable poche. Faite donc un geste Monsieur Le président de la République (Nicolas Sarkozy 2011). Nous ne sommes pas des vaches à lait qui en plus sont sous " Mind Control ", y'a pas moyen de cautionner ces évènements. C'est inadmissible !