Shame on you!
When facing kind , weak and innocent people, you abuse and torture them to death ;however, when encountering gang, mafia, you are overtaken by misgivings and fear. (瞻前顾后， 畏首畏尾)
News tell me.
All Posts (12221)
Sort by
Chrisitans took the low to court because they wanted to deny service to people based upon their sexuality among other things. SEE how it turns out here;
An excerpt from the following article;
"As the anti-balaka responded, he added, children were no longer caught in the crossfire but deliberately targeted. "There were bullets in the heads and chests of children. It's not possible they were there by accident. It's as if people are trying to finish off another race. It's about extreme revenge and it's brutal."
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/10/central-african-republic-christian-militias-revenge
I think it is easy to understand that These modern Christians would kill children, their god did it, and he isnt stopping them from killing those children, so it must be 'alright'...Right???
http://www.naturalnews.com/044464_cell_towers_EMF_pollution_mental_confusion.html#ixzz2x7J8iWWi
http://www.examiner.com/article/tvs-used-to-stalk-targeted-individuals-inside-their-homes
http://www.electrosensitivesociety.com/2010/04/01/electrosensitivity-uk/
1. Secretary-General’s message for victims
“I urge all Member States to accede to and fully implement the Convention against Torture and support the United Nations Voluntary Fund for Victims of Torture. Let us work together to end torture throughout the world and ensure that countries provide reparation for victims.”
http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2013/sgsm15131.doc.htm
2. Both Mr. Prime Minister of Canada and Mr. Attorney General of Canada stated on behalf of the Government for victims.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYsUbSK075s
3. UN human rights chief Navi Pillay’s message for torturers:
"Torturers, and their superiors, need to hear the following message loud and clear: however powerful you are today, there is a strong chance that sooner or later you will be held to account for your inhumanity." Pillay said. “ Torture is an extremely serious crime, and in certain circumstances can amount to a war crime, a crime against humanity or genocide."
4. Will Toronto Police, Canadian torturers stop their inhuman acts of torture?
5. Are these or those torturers not afraid of anything, like international law and international society? No, absolutely not. But, they have a set of measures or methods to deal with them.
This link, maybe you can’t open it. I don’t know how to solve it. They are now hacking everything. It is not necessary for me to show the evidence I have.
Canadian torture victim
Robin Yan
07/04/2014
Check this out! You hear a lot about the rift between christians and Transhumanism, but heris a group taking aNew Perspective! We might have something to learn from them!!!
https://www.facebook.com/groups/14798935435/?id=10153988921655436
In the course of my torture, I have willingly exposed myself to information available on the subject of targeting, remote torture with advanced electromagnetic and scalar weapons systems, and gang stalking. The information consists of input and contributions by fellow remotely tortured, targeted and gang stalked individuals found on this website and other websites addressing the same issues. The information consists of official documents about some of the electromagnetic weapons systems, their application (military and civilian) from military websites. The information consists of professional and academic papers on neuroscience (e.g. Dr. Persinger's papers, etc) and professional and academic papers on nanotechnologies. The information consists of books (e.g. Dr. Doug Beason, Ph.D; Dr. Duncan; Dr. Begich; etc...). The information consists of a historical record on non-consentual human experimentation in the United States, including files of congressional hearings. And so on and so forth...
From all these, I have benefited much from the experience of others and have learned a lot. But the learning process has required that I apply some guiding principles in how I process the information. Learn what to discard, and what to retain. What to further explore. And this is the summary of JUST ONE of the things I have learned:
Some (so called conspiracy theorists) argue that the government is behind these abuses. Some refute this.
My position:
I listen to what everyone has to say but do not force or compel others to see things my way. They probably have reasons for arriving at their conclusions, and while reasons may be flawed, they are never invalid. I happen to believe that the government/military or some agencies are wholely responsible for my torture. The reasons are that:
a) In the post 911 era, the prospect of multiple aircraft (including helicopters) surveilling my every single movement, 24/7, for almost 5 yrs now WITHOUT the government granting flying licenses to the aircraft, and knowing about the reasons the aircraft need to surveil, are ZERO. BTW, the aircraft can be seen by others as well so this is not a figment of my imagination.
b) The chances that my blood would develop an ability to have light-emitting objects when viewed under a microscope, when the head of the NIH advised a group of medical leaders to "ignore" any "UBOs" (unidentified bright objects) if they happen to find them inside a patient, (See ICAART DVD), suggests that there exists technologies whose capabilities to infuse/implant photonic/optic microdevices into unwitting victims' bodies, are both RECOGNIZED and EXPECTED to show up in such affected individuals.
c) An international organization that performs preliminary scans on targets found numerous frequency emissions from my head and body on June 30, 2012. The frequency emissions just happened to be in the range alloted to the military. No one else has application access to these frequencies except the parties that they are alloted to by the assigning agency. Any unauthorized access would constitute an act of war against the United States.
d)The relentless DESTRUCTION OF, AND OUTRIGHT THEFT, of microdevices my body is doused with, which include photonic crystals of all shape and form; nanofibers of various classes; official papers from military websites on the wireless, electromagnetic technologies; academic and professional papers on deleterious effects of some of these technologies on the human body; documentation of my barbaric torture with nanodevices and more... Non-governmental involvement would be happy to LEAVE THE MILITARY DOCUMENTS ALONE in order to shift the blame to someone else but this is not the case.
e) Constant character assassination and smears on FFFCHS' 'Comments' page (Pls go read this to see how far they will go to damage victims who are EFFECTIVELY EXPOSING these crimes). These tactics are consistent with some of the documents released in the Greenwald/Poitras/Scahill website on tactics used to discredit targets. Apart from Dennis Robinson, who it is alleged by the criminals is under my pay ( ! ), and whom they implore to kick me out of his website, no other target there receives this much attention. The degree of bigotry of these criminals is of such an extent that they refuse to believe that I am African and claim that I am a caucasian with blue eyes who HAS SOMEONE ELSE WRITING MY POSTS ! Never mind that many TIs in Oregon who have seen me in person, and who voted to have me write a letter to Senator Ron Wyden know the truth...
f) My body turns on street walking signals on "smart" street lights when my I am within activating range of some circuitry on the street light that interacts with illegal implants in my body. One of the companies making these is Intellistreet. Older street lights do not react to my body in this way; they remain silent as with many other non-implanted persons. The body can also turn these lights off, on, dim them or intensify the light. One of Intellistreet's contracts is with Homeland Security, according to documents.
g) This list could go on until it is a thick as the thickest book known...And this is just ON ONE AREA. But I must stop here. Library time where I write this is limited.
Conclusion:
Who I believe to be behind my torture has a sound basis in fact. Who someone else believes is behind THEIR torture has their own reasons that may or may not coincide with mine. But IT IS NOT MY PLACE to dismiss their belief or to try to command them to see things my way. Nor IS IT THEIR PLACE to dismiss my belief or try to command me to see things their way. I have to listen to them, not judge, nor recommend to them that they see otherwise. Else one comes across as having something VESTED in swaying others one way or the other.
Best to you.
You can't watch the tv or radio without getting harassed to some extent and going out too . I have found some positive digital songs to try to cheer me up.
I realized i am being a spoiled brat while in the hospital, I am trying to change but everything I do they seem to mostly dislike. I am also now seeing a psychotherapist.... The lack of not being able to distract yourself is very hard.
So what does everyone do for fun? I like walking my dog and looking at nature in my backward and playing games with my family but i would like to be with the public.
Btw anyone seen the new the AArp magazine?
there is a good article on ways to "bounce back" and article on Patrick Stewart on battling the darkness within that seems interesting for us.
Any people in Toronto, Canada who experience voice to skull electronic harassment please contact me. There are a number of us here trying to figure out a solution to this problem. PS I do not care at all about any conspiracy theories or anti government bs. I do not even believe that the government or police are harassing average unimportant non criminal individuals this way. In any case the solution to the problem in spite the perpetrators is finding proof ( clear evidence that we are being assaulted with yet publicly unrecognized communications technology and not some nut conspiracy theorists that think aliens or some other stupid thing is doing this ) So we need to have a technical approach, demonstrate first that there is in fact a signal directed at us, second track the source and call the cops. This is very basic outline that is why it is necessary to have a large group of rational people to provide more ideas and ultimately resolve this.
The following news made me think of lots? What about you ?
http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/04/04/ontario-premier-kathleen-wynne-slaps-tim-hudak-with-a-libel-notice-over-gas-plant-allegations/
Fighting Cancer with Nanomedicine
Nanotechnology-based therapeutics will revolutionize cancer treatment.
| April 1, 2014
© SETIXELA/ISTOCKPHOTO.COM
Short drug circulation times and difficulty localizing therapy to tumor sites are but two of the challenges associated with existing cancer treatments. More troubling are the issues of drug toxicity and tumor resistance. Toxicity can cause major complications, such as low white-blood-cell counts or heart failure, that necessitate cessation of treatment. The tissue damage inflicted by some therapies can even be fatal. And evolution of drug resistance by tumors accounts for the vast majority of cases in which treatment fails. Given these and other issues associated with treatment safety and efficacy, scientists are applying tremendous effort toward the utilization of nanomedicine in the fight against cancer.
Nanotechnology-based therapeutics have exhibited clear benefits when compared with unmodified drugs, including improved half-lives, retention, and targeting efficiency, and fewer patient side effects. Researchers have already made progress with chemotherapeutic nanomedicines in the clinic. Several compounds that are in various stages of trials or already approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). For example, Calando Pharmaceuticals has demonstrated the first evidence of nanoparticle-delivered clinical RNA interference (RNAi) (Nature, 464:1067-70, 2010). BIND Biosciences has shown that nanoparticles combining a chemotherapeutic drug with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) can reduce lung and tonsillar lesions with greater efficacy compared with the drug alone, and at substantially lower doses (Sci Transl Med, doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3003651, 2012). Furthermore, Celgene’s Abraxane, an albumin-functionalized paclitaxel formulation, was initially approved by the FDA for sale as a breast cancer therapy, but also recently received approval for the treatment of lung and pancreatic cancers.
Cancer nanomedicine possesses the versatility required to uniquely overcome some of the most challenging impediments to treatment success.
On the preclinical front, several nanomaterial formulations have shown promise. Single-agent nanoparticle delivery, both actively and passively targeted, has been demonstrated with a host of platforms using silica, polymer, metal, and carbon-based materials.
Delivering a double whammy
Researchers recently reported multidrug delivery using nanoparticles to mediate resistance in relapsing cancers and to improve triple-negative breast cancer treatment efficacy. Other recent approaches have included layer-by-layer siRNA and doxorubicin delivery for breast cancer therapy, simultaneous loading of small interfering RNA (siRNA) and tumor-penetrating peptides against ovarian cancer, as well as sequential administration of multiple types of nanoparticles for pancreatic cancer treatment (Adv Funct Mater, doi:10.1002/adfm.201303222, 2014). These exciting approaches have served as a foundation for the next phase of cancer nanomedicine in the clinic—the rational design of nanomaterial-drug combinations.
Until more nanoparticles are validated in the clinic, however, the impact that nanomedicine may have on cancer treatment has yet to be fully realized. In order for chemotherapies modified using nanotechnology to profoundly change hematological and oncological practice, the application of engineered nanomedicines must be paired with emerging strategies to rationally design nanotherapeutic combinations. This is critical because combinatorial therapy is an efficient way to simultaneously address the barriers to treatment success, and it is widely used in treating cancer and infectious diseases.
Current clinical methodologies for combinatorial drug design include additive treatments that combine two or more drugs at their highest tolerable but still efficacious dose, although the synergistic effects among drugs cannot be taken into account using this additive approach. As the field gradually embraces the use of nanoparticles to deliver multiple compounds with different targets, a move away from additive dosing is necessary. This raises several important questions. For example, silencing genes to combat resistance, mediating apoptosis, and allowing vascular access are each pathways worth targeting, but what if multiple pathways are targeted at the same time to comprehensively attack the tumor? How will dosing be determined? How will the dosages of each drug be adjusted if efficacy is improved but toxicity is worsened? More importantly, how will “optimization” be defined, especially if the desired outcome is to simultaneously stop tumor growth, eliminate resistance, maintain white blood cell counts, and achieve a host of other objectives?
The next phase of cancer nanomedicine in the clinic is the rational design of nanomaterial-drug combinations.
An attempt to optimize any one of these conditions will inevitably affect the others. Furthermore, these conditions vary from patient to patient, so phenotypic personalized medicine will be required. In addition, these issues create a parameter space that is too large to be individually tested and can result in an arbitrary dosing scenario. For example, a combination of six candidate therapeutics with 10 possible concentrations represents a minimum of 1 million possible combinations. Identifying a solution that rapidly converges on a defined set of phenotypic outcomes is a challenge that faces both unmodified drug administration and drug delivery by nanoparticles.
To move beyond short-term cancer management—or single outcomes, like delaying tumor growth using a nanoparticle drug formulation—and to enable long-term or potentially permanent disease management, the field of nanomedicine will inevitably need to be paired with advanced strategies to rapidly determine dosing conditions that can simultaneously optimize for efficacy and safety. One promising route is the field of feedback system control (FSC), which relies on phenotypic responses instead of trying to interrogate cellular pathways, their individual protein components, or a spectrum of genotypic responses. One example is the use of a search algorithm in a feedback loop that can guide the formulation of rational drug combinations, both unmodified and nanotherapeutic. (SeePNAS, 105:5105-10, 2008; BMC Systems Biology, 5:88, 2011.) Remarkably, this approach can be used for in vitro studies with cell lines and primary cells, and for preclinical and even clinical validation. And because FSC utilizes outcomes to iteratively suggest new possible combinations before rapid convergence—in tens of trials versus a million or more—toward an optimal combinatorial dose, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are inherently accounted for with this approach. Furthermore, because combinations will vary from patient to patient, FSC will help personalized nanomedicine dosing on a case-by-case basis.
In sum, cancer nanomedicine possesses the versatility required to uniquely overcome some of the most challenging impediments to treatment success. Rationally designing nanotherapeutic combinations using rapid convergence solutions such as FSC represents a promising pathway from cancer management towards cancer elimination.
Dean Ho is a professor of oral biology and medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) School of Dentistry, where he codirects the Weintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology. He is also a UCLA professor of bioengineering and a member of the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and California NanoSystems Institute. In December 2013, Ho coauthored a review of the translation of cancer nanomedicine to the clinic (E.K. Chow, D. Ho,Sci Transl Med, doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3005872, 2013).
Tags
11. A tribe slaughtered and their virgins raped for not showing up at roll call. In Judges 21:1-23, a tribe of Israelites misses roll call, so the other Israelites kill them all except for the female virgins, which they take for themselves(note that they didnt take any young men for the women of Isreal, just young virgin girls for the men of Isreal). Still not happy, they hide in vineyards and pounce on dancing women from Shiloh to take them for themselves ( as sex slaves). - See more at: http://commonsenseatheism.com/?p=21#sthash.2Nhq6AJs.dpuf read full text here!
Wives Provided for the Tribe of Benjamin
21 Now the men of Israel had sworn kat Mizpah, “No one of us shall give his daughter in marriage to Benjamin.” 2 And the people came to lBethel and sat there till evening before God, and they lifted up their voices and wept bitterly. 3 And they said, “O Lord, the God of Israel, why has this happened in Israel, that today there should be one tribe lacking in Israel?” 4 And the next day the people rose early and mbuilt there an altar and offered burnt offerings and peace offerings. 5 And the people of Israel said, “Which of all the tribes of Israel did not come up in the assembly to the Lord?” nFor they had taken a great oath concerning him who did not come up to the Lord to Mizpah, saying, “He shall surely be put to death.” 6 And the people of Israel ohad compassion for Benjamin their brother and said, “One tribe is cut off from Israel this day. 7 pWhat shall we do for wives for those who are left, since we have sworn by theLord that we will not give them any of our daughters for wives?”
8 And they said, “What one is there of the tribes of Israel that did not come up to the Lord to Mizpah?” And behold, no one had come to the camp from qJabesh-gilead, to the assembly. 9 For when the people were mustered, behold, not one of the inhabitants of qJabesh-gilead was there. 10 So the congregation sent 12,000 of their bravest men there and commanded them, r“Go and strike the inhabitants of Jabesh-gilead with the edge of the sword; also the women and the little ones. 11 This is what you shall do: severy male and every woman that has lain with a male you shall devote to destruction.” 12 And they found among the inhabitants of Jabesh-gilead 400 young virgins who had not known a man by lying with him, and they brought them to the camp at tShiloh, which is in the land of Canaan.
13 Then the whole congregation sent word to the people of Benjamin who were at the urock of Rimmon and vproclaimed peace to them. 14 And Benjamin returned at that time. And they gave them the women whom they had saved alive of the women of Jabesh-gilead, but they were not enough for them. 15 And the people whad compassion on Benjamin because theLord had made a breach in the tribes of Israel.
16 Then the elders of the congregation said, x“What shall we do for wives for those who are left, since the women are destroyed out of Benjamin?” 17 And they said, “There must be an inheritance for the survivors of Benjamin, that a tribe not be blotted out from Israel. 18 Yet we cannot give them wives from our daughters.” yFor the people of Israel had sworn, “Cursed be he who gives a wife to Benjamin.” 19 So they said, “Behold, there is the yearly feast of the Lordat Shiloh, which is north of Bethel, on the east of zthe highway that goes up from Bethel to Shechem, and south of Lebonah.” 20 And they commanded the people of Benjamin, saying, “Go and lie in ambush in the vineyards 21 and watch. If the daughters of Shiloh come out toadance in the dances, then come out of the vineyards and snatch each man his wife from the daughters of Shiloh, and go to the land of Benjamin. 22 And when their fathers or their brothers come to complain to us, we will say to them, ‘Grant them graciously to us, because we did not take for each man of them his wife in battle, neither did you give them to them, else you would now be guilty.’ ” 23 And the people of Benjamin did so and took their wives, according to their number, from the dancers whom they carried off. Then they went and returned to their inheritance band rebuilt the towns and lived in them.
WILL VIRUS PARTICLES MEET THEIR END IN THESE TINY DEATH TRAPS?
Whether or not the single biggest threat to humankind’s continued vitality on the planet is the virus, as Nobel Laureate Joshua Lederberg has said, there’s no question that viruses impose a hefty toll on human health worldwide. Though bacteria have been more or less conquered with antibiotics (though that’s not as certain as it used to be), viruses have continued to thrive and mutate despite Western medicine’s best efforts to combat them.
But there’s a new kid on the medical block: Nanotechnology is gradually turning its hypothetical promise into real applications. Some see nanotech-based medicines as an entirely new set of tools in a doctor’s medical bag. Among commercial companies, Vecoy Nanomedicines is most bullish on the promise of nanotechnology to combat viruses.
The Israeli startup — whose founder, biologist Erez Livneh, fine-tuned the idea at Singularity University’s 2010 GSP program — is building a new class of medicines to fight viruses.
“The secret sauce here is not a specific material but a structure,” Livneh emphasized in his presentation at this year’s Solve for X competition.
The structure is a nano-sized virus trap that would be administered in bulk, either with an injection or with an aerosol spray, to a patient who had been exposed to a virus. The polyhedron traps are large for nanomachines but still far smaller than a blood cell. Their outer layer dupes the immune system into recognizing it as friend, not foe, while pores in the surface are large enough to invite viruses in. After a virus enters, it meets with sharp pokers that physically destroy it.
“The Vecoy technology is the invention that solved a seeming paradox: How do you create a particle that’s attractive to viruses but that’s invisible to the immune system?” Livneh explained in a recent interview with Singularity Hub.
They claim that in a recent in vitro test, repeated rounds of the traps captured 97 percent of the viral copies that were floating around with human cells.
Vecoy is considering a number of different materials from which to build. But the seeming frontrunner is folded DNA, which has emerged as a viable raw material from which to build nanostructures. But some believe the biological material will inevitably trigger an immune response, even in its abstracted form.
“I feel that this approach is flawed, and could cause a dangerous, inflammatory innate immune response that could make the patient extremely ill,” said Stanford’s Annelise Barron. The immune response could potentially be averted, Barron said, if “the percentage of DNA in the ‘decoy’ construct could be adjusted to be minimal.”
Supporters of so-called DNA origami, on the other hand, claim that the worst-case scenario will be that the body will biodegrade the DNA-based machines before they can perform their function.
“People ask, ‘How do you guarantee that this stuff will be ejected?’ but our challenge is guaranteeing it won’t be ejected too fast,” Livneh explained.
What would happen to the devices after they were administered to a patient and had done their work? In one scenario, the immune system would clear out the traps. In another, the traps would dissolve, releasing broken viral strands, which would hopefully help the immune system learn to target the virus more effectively on its own.
A wide range of potential uses for the mini virus traps can be envisioned. In addition to being administered to patients as medicine, they could be cycled through donated blood and other transplantable body fluids. They could also be used to purge water supplies of viruses such as cholera. In that case, the traps would be made from magnetic material to be retrieved after use with a magnet.
It’s hard to argue with the need for a more effective ways of controlling viral illnesses.
“We need new ways of looking at viruses. The Spanish flu killed more than all the casualties of World War I by both sides. If that virus were to hit today, we’re not better off; we’re actually worse off with a denser population and international flights,” Livneh said. “This is exactly the kind of stuff that got me into science in the first place. It’s an opportunity to make a radical change for the better.”
http://singularityhub.com/2014/04/01/will-virus-particles-meet-their-end-in-these-tiny-death-traps/
