If you get any responses and replies when you write to the government or public, please post here by "reply to this discussion"

 

Mailteam works during the past few years

https://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/mailteam-1

Mailteam members

https://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/mailteam-members

Mailteam Mass Petitions

https://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/mailteam-mass-petitions

 

Lawsuits filed by victims  https://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/lawsuits-of-mind-control

Mind Control technologies
https://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/introduce-mind-control-and

 

Please go to LAST PAGE OF "Replies to this Discussion" to read NEWEST Information

You need to be a member of Peacepink3 to add comments!

Join Peacepink3

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • THE WHITE HOUSE June 4, 2012

    Dear Letitia:

    Thank you for sharing your thoughts with me. Many Americans have written to me about human rights around the world, and I appreciate your perspective.

    The United States was founded on the  principles of freedom and equality, and our history is marked with triumphs and struggles in fulfilling these timeless ideals. Our task is not finished, and protecting these core values is a shared obligation and a priority for my Administration. No nation should be silent in the fight against human rights
    violations. When innocents in places like Sudan, Syria, and the Democratic Republic of Congo are raped, murdered, or tortured, it is a stain on our collective conscience. I am committed to reinvigorating America's leadership on
    a range of international human rights issues.

    As the struggle for human rights continues around the world, we have witnessed an extraordinary change in the Middle East and North Africa. Country by country, people have risen up across this region to demand their human rights; too often, these calls for change have been answered by violence. The United States opposes the use of
    violence and repression against these men and women. Rather, we support a set of universal rights, including free speech, the freedom of peaceful assembly, freedom of religion, equality for men and women under the rule of law, and the right of people to choose their own leaders. We also support political and economic reform in the Middle East and North Africa that can meet the legitimate aspirations of ordinary people throughout the region. While change may not come easily, America will stand squarely on the side of those who are reaching for their rights, knowing their success will bring about a world that is more peaceful, more stable, and more just.

    As you may know, the United States has joined the United Nations Human Rights Council and is working to make
    this body as effective as possible. My Administration will also advocate for human rights in other international settings. In our relations with other countries, the issue of human rights will continue to be raised as clearly,
    persistently, and effectively as possible. Among other things, we will continue to promote accountability for mass atrocities; respect for the rights of minorities and women; freedom of association, speech, and religion; and freedom for people to live as they choose and love whom they chose.

    Our commitment to human rights is an essential element of American foreign policy and serves our national security. Through it, we will help to shut down torture chambers, replace tyranny with good governance, and enlist free nations in the common cause of liberty. To learn more about my Administration's human rights agenda, please visit www.HumanRights.gov or www.WhiteHouse.gov/CPo. Thank you, again, for writing.
    Sincerely,
    Barack Obama

  • Dear Jonathan,

    I was very sorry to read your letter and learn about the difficulties you have faced. Unfortunately, CCR is unable to offer you any legal assistance. We receive hundreds of inquiries each week and can no longer accept public requests for assistance. I apologize for the inconvenience this may cause.

    If you are seeking legal help, the Legal Aid Society (or 212-577-3300 for the NYC office) may be able to assist you. If you visit LawHelp.org, you can click on your state and find resources in your area. You might also try the American Bar Association (312-988-5522 ), the National Lawyers Guild, or the American Civil Liberties Union.

    I wish you the best of luck in your struggles.

    Best,
    Leah Todd

  • Alan Stein <Alan@steinandstein.com> 3 de maio de 2012 18:30
    Para: ...@gmail.com>, Neil Stein <nstein@steinandstein.com>, Donald Michelin <Donald@steinandstein.com>, Stephanie Rassam <srassam@steinandstein.com>

    Unfortunately our firm cannot help you on such a matter. Alan Stein

     

     

    Yours truly,

     

    (s) Alan M. Stein

     

    Me Alan M. Stein, Attorney

    4101 Sherbrooke Street West

    Montreal, Quebec    H3Z 1A7

    Telephone:  514-866-9806, Ext. 212

    Telecopier:  514-875-8218

    Email:          alan@steinandstein.com

     

    This message is confidential and privileged.  If you are not the addressee, please inform the sender by return e-mail immediately and delete this message, and destroy all copies./Ce message est confidentiel et protege par le secret professionnel.  Si vous n'etes pas le destinataire, veuillez informer l'expediteur par courriel immediatement et effacer ce message et en detruire toute copie.

  • amnestyis@amnesty.org <amnestyis@amnesty.org>

    Para: …@gmail.com

    Dear Susana,


    Many thanks for your e-mail. Unfortunately, your query appears to fall outside the remit of Amnesty International.

    If you wish to check which kinds of cases AI can deal with, please check our Web page located at:

    http://www.amnesty.org/en/who-we-are


    Sorry we are not able to be of further assistance in this matter.

    Kind regards,
    Communications Team
     

     

  • First response to the House of Commons of Canada after our petition was refused with significant conflicts.

    https://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/first-response-to-the-hous...

  • The Challenge of Exotic Weapons


    (Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada )

    Conclusion

    http://www.international.gc.ca/arms-armes/isrop-prisi/research-rech...

    For those states that are on the leading edge of exotic weapons development, opposition will be high to any attempt to formulate a convention that bans whole categories of weapons, let alone have a verification regime that would necessitate intrusive inspections into the very heart of secret facilities and technologies. Since it is not clear at this writing which states are the leading competitors in specific types of weapons systems, more transparency will be needed to contemplate arms control treaties. The best short-term possibilities to address the implications of the upcoming generation of weaponry are non-proliferation control regimes that are national and possibly international in nature. Concerned officials and ex-officials in the United States have recently recommended using national controls such as the “Critical List.” The motivation for making this prescription has more to do with preventing the diffusion of affordable technologies as part of weapons that are a threat to national infrastructure. Careful application of the Geneva Protocol (1949), specifically Article 36 of Additional Protocol I by national governments, would allow policy makers to ask critical questions as to the stated purpose or intent of the weapon.67 Many states that are not yet party to Additional Protocol I have adopted procedures to ensure their weapons are subjected to this type of review.68

    The current international situation is ripe for a discussion about the paths that several governments are taking with new generation weapons, including those classed as so called “non-lethal weapons. Conducting this dialogue is a complex issue. Development of exotic weapons that have the capacity to be both lethal and non-lethal raise questions as to the actual intent of the weapon and their effects. Setting an agenda internationally on these new technologies is not simplified because of the proliferation argument or the notion that the misuse of such weapons will likely be caused by rogue states. Due to its large investments in DEW, the Russian Federation may also be a critical link to future dialogue. The issue is more sensitive because the states where dialogue should begin are friends and allies of Canada. The United States, United Kingdom and France are states that are leaders in exotic technologies. Attempts to establish some controls or regimes may also be complicated by our commitments to NATO and possibly our own future technical involvements through research and bilateral projects.

    There have been enough warning signals that should propel NGO’s and concerned governments to action. Why should there be concern? What weapons systems should be the subject of prompt action? The Moscow theatre gassing in October 2002, is a significant cause for alarm. Reassessing the prohibitions in the CWC regarding calmative agents should be a start. What is even more of a concern is that the use of Fentanyl by security forces illustrates the specious nature of the argument that advocates of non-lethal weapons are making with regards to notions of reduced casualties and minimal effects to human beings. This incident should be a critical example of what necessitates Article 36 reviews and international attention. According to one U.S. military study, “Directed energy (EMP and HPM) and acoustic technologies offer the greatest near term promise for a credible war fighting capability.”69 The Swedish designed High Energy Whirls device utilizing vortex technology is also a cause for concern regarding trauma injuries. The use of microwave technology for “area denial” applications is an operational reality in the U.S. military. If this capability is enhanced without proper reviews and transparency, the issue of superfluous injury and unnecessary suffering will be a missed opportunity. Careful scrutiny of these areas is essential and urgent. In many areas however, there is not enough information on new systems and their full capabilities, particularly when programs are taken over by national militaries.

    Numerous analysts studying these issues have stated that discussion is long overdue and should begin immediately, particularly with more transparency, accountability and information available to the public in several countries. The domestic and international implications of the use and misuse of several exotic weapons and nonlethal variants are serious and require a higher priority by the Canadian government and international fora.

  • From: Wendy Davis <Wendy.Davis@senate.state.tx.us>
    To: "dixjoes@yahoo.com" <dixjoes@yahoo.com>
    Sent: Fri, March 25, 2011 3:14:00 PM
    Subject: RE: Ban mind control/directed energy weapons abuse and torture

    Dear Mr. Dixon,

    Thank you for taking the time to contact my office regarding international human rights. I truly appreciate you sharing your comments with me.

    As this is a federal, and not state issue, my office is not able to offer you any assistance. Please contact your U.S. Congresswoman, Kay Granger, who can be reached at:

    WASHINGTON OFFICE FORT WORTH OFFICE
    320 Cannon Hob 1701 River Run Road, Suite 407
    WASHINGTON, DC 20515 Fort Worth, Texas 76107
    (202)-225-5071 (817) 338-0909
    (202)-225-5683 (fax) (817) 335-5852 (fax)

    Thank you again for writing. I hope you will continue to share your perspective with your elected representatives.

    Sincerely,


    Wendy R Davis
    Texas Senate - District 10

    -----Original Message-----
    From: joe dixon [mailto:dixjoes@yahoo.com]
    Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 11:02 AM
    To: Wendy Davis
    Subject: Ban mind control/directed energy weapons abuse and torture

    Sen. Wendy Davis
    Capitol Extension, EXT E1.608
    1100 Congress Avenue
    Austin TX 78701


    Dear Representative,

    Thousands of people are asking for an international investigation of enormous human rights violations that are silently taking place worldwide at this moment.

    In recent years the numbers of those crimes against humanity rose so much that we can openly speak about the civilian population being under attack.

    This attack is committed with technology working invisibly at a distance, beyond the bounds of borders, and is at this moment being used against helpless and unsuspecting citizens.

    The victims are constantly lobbying to report these crimes to government officials, human rights organizations, world leaders and the press. Mostly, they don't get answers because of a general lack of knowledge about the technology. Mental institutions may diagnose the victims as delusional. And complaints lodged at local police stations are often treated as psychological problems or ignored.
    It may take several years, before the "silent holocaust" becomes public knowledge. And for the victims, the comparison is very real.

    The scale of the crimes being reported, and the seriousness of the accusations, justifies an urgent international investigation.

    Because there are so many victims worldwide, spawning a worldwide movement coordinated via the Internet, it is only the most diligent and conscientious of victims who are able to report this crime; the actual number of victims being many times larger than this group of activists.

    In January 2007, the article "Mind Games" appeared in "The Washington Post", written by journalist Sharon Weinberger, about the American victims and the activist organization, Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance.

    Meanwhile, from all parts of the world new victims are showing up in greater numbers. They are asking for these crimes to be made public and are insisting on an international investigation of this problem.
    And starting a collective campaign against abuses and tortures of the following:-

    DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS; NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONS; MIND CONTROL WEAPONS; BODY AND BRAIN MANIPULATION WEAPONS; PSYCHOTRONIC WEAPONS; SPACE WEAPONS; NON-LETHAL WEAPONS; COINTELPRO; AND any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person) through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations or the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations.
    Thank you and Best Regards!
    Your sincerely,


    Note: this email was sent as part of a petition started on Change.org, viewable at www.change.org/petitions/ban-mind-controldirected-energy-weapons-ab...  . To  respond, email responses@change.org and include a link to this petition.
  • (1) The Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
    Targeted people in America give testimony Feb 28th, 2011
    http://www.tvworldwide.com/events/bioethics/110228/default.cfm?id=13288&type=flv&test=0&live=0

    More reports of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues by Deborah Dupre
    http://www.examiner.com/human-rights-in-national/extreme-human-rights-abuses-through-experimentation-presented-to-obama-1-vid
  • 28. MR NIKIFOROUS DIAMANDOUROS, THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN, 11/9/09

    S2009-104176
    STRASBOURG 8/5/09
    COMPLAINT NUMBER: 1568/2006/(AVM)OV

    Dear Sir (Mr John Finch)

    I am writing in reply to your emails of 10, 11, 17 and 18 August 2009 in which you come back on your earlier complaint 1568/2006/(AVM)OV concerning your “directed energy and neurological weapons torture, degradation and mutilation case” you also sent me a “list of the crimes committed by the NWO criminals”.

    As I already informed you in my letters 22 June and 14 September 2006, and 8 May 2009, I unfortunately have no power to intervene in this matter.

    I regret that I cannot be of further assistance to you in this case

    Yours sincerely,

    P. Nikiforos DIAMANDOROUS
    The European Ombudsman
    1 Ave President Robert Schumann – CS 30403 – F-67001 strasbourg Cedex
    TEL: 33 (0)3.88.172313 – fax: 33 (0)3.88.179062
    http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu – eo@ombudsman.europa.eu


    29. MR MARTIN FERGUSON, MEMBER OF AUSTRALIAN PARLIAMENT, 7/1/10

    REF: MF/MK (2010/01/07)

    Dear Mr Finch

    Further to our recent meeting, I have written to the Attorney General, Robert McClelland requesting that your suspicion about constant monitoring of your life by ASIO and the Australian Federal Police be investigated.

    You will be advised of any response I receive from the Attorney General.

    Best wishes for 2010

    Yours sincerely
    MARTIN FERGUSON AM MP
    Federal Member for Batman, Minister for Resource and Energy, Minister for Tourism
    www.martinferguson.com.au


    30. MR IAN CARNELL, INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY, OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY, AUSTRALIA, 24/3/10

    Correspondence reference: 2010/505
    File reference: 2009/62
    24 March 2010

    Mr John Finch, tijohnfinch@gmail.com

    Dear Mr Finch

    Thank you for your email of 16 March 2010 asking for protection from surveillance, torture and abuse. I have read your email and note that you believe you are being tortured and abused by ‘directed energy and neuroligical weapons’ by United States government agencies with the complicity of other governments and security agencies.

    Before responding to your specific concerns, it is appropriate that I inform you a little about the role and functions of my office.

    The Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS) has general oversight responsibilities for each of the six Australian intelligence agencies. The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) is Australia’s domestic security agency and is therefore the Australian intelligence agency most likely to have interaction with Australian persons. The focus of ASIO’s work is on countering terrorism, discouraging people who may act violently for political reasons, and discouraging people who seek to clandestinely obtain sensitive government information or otherwise harm Australia’s interests in order to further their own causes or the interests of foreign governments.

    Other ASIO functions include collecting foreign intelligence within Australia, and providing security assessments and protective security advice.

    Based on my experience as IGIS for nearly six years, I can assure you that neither ASIO nor any agency within the Australian Intelligence Community (AIC) has the resources, motivation or legal authority to harm individuals in the way you describe.

    I am confident in making this assertion because ASIO and the other AIC agencies are each subjected to intensive and frequent review by this office, to ensure that they conduct their business within the bounds of the law, and in a professional and ethical manner. I can also assure you that the inspection regime undertaken by my office is very thorough.

    You have also raised the possibility that a foreign intelligence service might be involved in the activities you described. ASIO has a functional interest in monitoring any such activity, and in turn my office closely examines ASIO’s activities in this area. On the basis of the material available to me, I do not believe that they are negligent in this regard.

    I should also tell you that I do not have any jurisdiction over any foreign intelligence services, but despite this would regard it as highly improbable that they would target any member of the Australian public who is simply going about their ordinary business.

    While I don’t doubt that you have experienced a range of issues that are of concern to you, none of the AIC agencies have the capabilities or motivation to do what you describe.

    If you believe you have been the subject of a crime, you have the option of discussing this with your local police.

    While my office is unable to directly assist you, I nonetheless hope that the above information is both helpful and reassuring to you.

    On behalf of
    Ian Carnell, Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security

    Office of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security
    P +61 2 6271 5692 | F +61 2 6271 5696 | www.igis.gov.au
  • 18. THE INDEPENDENT COMMISSIONER PETER J O'CALLAGHAN ARCHDIOCESE OF MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA 1/8/08

    From: Marilyn Stefanile
    Date: Aug 1, 2008 10:20 AM
    Subject: Email from Peter O'Callaghan
    To: tijohnfinch@gmail.com

    Dear Mr Finch

    I have received your email expressing your complaints in relation to the matters referred to.

    I confirm that I am the Independent Commissioner appointed by the Archdiocese of Melbourne to enquire into allegations of sexual abuse by priests, religious and lay persons within the Archdiocese of Melbourne.

    I note your serious concerns, but they do not fall within my jurisdiction. I sympathise with your concerns, but am unable to assist you.

    Yours sincerely
    Peter J O'Callaghan - Independent Commissioner
    Telephone: 9225 7979


    19. NEW YORK STATEHOUSE HEARINGS REGARDING OUR ISSUES SLATED FOR FEBRUARY - 22/8/08

    On Thursday, Tim in New York met with State Senator Eric Adams, a boyhood friend of his who is has recently met with some TI's regarding our issues. I wrote about him in the newsletter a couple of weeks ago. He has been reviewing informational material from us for the past 2-3 weeks.

    In the meeting, Rep. Adams stated that he wants to hold hearings concerning OS/EH harassment in February. He's asking that we send a brief summary of our harassment for his review to: NYhearing@aol.com The hearing is open to the public. Therefore, anyone anywhere in New York state, the country or the globe can give their testimony or attend. For clarity and time considerations he is reviewing the summaries submitted for testimony. The location for the hearing will be New York City. The exact address has not been determined. We'll of course have a group of expert witnesses to address the senators about the technology and the psychology of the abuses as well. We've provided him a suggested list of experts who have expressed their willingness to testify. Those people he plans to contact and interview personally.

    He also mentioned that he wants media involvement, which he could generate. And that this hearing would be the start of spinoff hearings in other states and would ultimately result in a congressional hearing.

    It would certainly be beneficial if there were some other state representatives that could work with him on this hearing. Hopefully, we will find others who will come forward to lend their support to these issues.

    One last comment: Scheduling of the hearing is the first step. Completing the hearing is the goal. And 5 1/2 months to go gives the stalkers plenty of time for mischief. Those that were around last year will remember the television show that we were all counting on, only to have it cancelled just days before taping. And the Firecracker Films documentary that never materialized. And numerous television and newspaper reporters that contacted us and never heard from again. So we've got to remember that something of this magnitude may encounter perp interference. What I'm suggesting is that for all who are believers that we need to remain in prayer for this event - for Senator Adams and for the success of the hearing. Also keep in mind that the month of February in New York could bring issues with the weather, which the perps have been known to bring on at just the exact time. So please keep all these things in mind as we pray, and pray believing. Personally, my belief is that we can only succeed in this struggle with God's help. A word to the wise is sufficient.

    All this will be discussed at the conference call this Saturday night. And if there's time, Dale Wahl will join us to talk about his project.

    For further questions or comments about the state hearing, please contact Tim in New York at: timothywhite2001@yahoo.com


    20. SUMMARY REPORT OF MY MEETING WITH THE LAWYERS IN PARIS
    September 13, 2008 by Rudy Andria rudyrud2004@gmail.com

    Only 3 lawyers turned up, the other 3 were held up at their offices at the last moment and briefly chatted with us on the phone.

    1.They all know about the existence of various technological means which violate the fundamental human rights of innocent people , they know the existence of non lethal weapons and of highly sophisticated psychological pressures.

    2.They do not have the slightest doubt about some governments' participation in influencing or even destroying the free will of some people.

    3.They know that the exposure of such practices usually provokes sniggering and those who dare to complain are either made fun of or accused of paranoia.
    Paranoia , of course, does exist and as it is characterized by an excessive mistrust of other people's acts or an excessive mistrust of power, it affects every social relationship and makes it possible to justify exclusion .

    4.Utmost rigour and precision are therefore required when exposing the attacks on the victims' integrity, privacy and freedom of thought by invisible means. .
    It is only by building up impeccable fact-files supported by official reports and scientific studies that public opinion worldwide can be sensitized and made aware of the problem.
    It is only under these conditions of rigour and precision that the 3 lawyers present will agree to put the case for the defence.

    The 3 lawyers all agreed on the following points:
    Our difficulty is that we have practically no legal evidence of the attacks, so we have to make do with:
    a) statistics
    b) similarities in symptoms and experiences
    c) similarities of torture cases
    d) existence of weapons'patents
    e) existence of the technology patents for the use of V2K
    f) complicity of a number of psychiatrists worldwide
    G) the highly probable involvement of many governments ( two lawyers referred to the example of helicopters and said that not many people can afford to maintain aircrafts. Flights are logged and the airspace they are in is recorded).

    Rudy Andria
    September 13, 2008

    I've forgotten to add 1 point: the 3 lawyers think that our first help should come from the parliamentarians, because they are the ones who make the laws.


    21. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT – The Office of the Prosecutor

    INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT – The Office of the Prosecutor
    Our Reference: OTP-CR-70/07
    The Hague, Monday, 29 September 2008

    Dear Sir/Madam

    On behalf of the Prosecutor, I thank you for your communication received 21/2/2007, as well as any subsequent related information.

    As you may know, the International Criminal Court (“the ICC” or “the Court”) is governed by the Rome Statute, which entrusts the court with a very specific and carefully defined jurisdiction and mandate. A fundamental feature of the Rome Statute is that the Court may only exercise jurisdiction over persons for the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole, namely genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, as defined in the Rome Statute (Articles 6 to 8). The Court may only exercise jurisdiction over crimes committed on or after 1 July 2002 (Article 11). In addition, the Court may only exercise jurisdiction over crimes committed on the territory of a State that has accepted the jurisdiction of the Court or by a national of such a State (Article 12), or where the Security Council refers the situation to the Court 9Article 13).

    Accordingly, I regret to advise you that your communication appears to relate to matters outside the jurisdiction of the Court. The Prosecutor has therefore confirmed that there is not a basis at this time to proceed with further analysis. The information you have submitted will be maintained in our archives, and the decision not to proceed may be reconsidered if new facts or evidence provide a reasonable basis to believe that a crime the jurisdiction of the Court has been committed.

    I hope you will appreciate that with the defined jurisdiction of the Court, many serious allegations will be beyond the reach of this institution to address, I note in this regard that the ICC is designed to complement, not replace national jurisdictions. Thus, if you wish to pursue this matter further, you may consider raising it with other appropriate national or international authorities.

    I am grateful for your interest in the ICC. If you would like to learn more about the work of the ICC, I invite you to visit our website at www.icc-cpi.int .

    John Finch
    5/8 Kemp Street, Thornbury, Vic, 3071, Australia

    Yours sincerely
    {signature}

    M.P. Dillon
    Head of the Information & Evidence Unit
    Office of the Prosecutor

    Post Office Box 19519, 2500 CM The Hague, The Netherlands
    TEL: 31-70-5158515 FAX: 31-70-5158555 http://www.icc-cpi.int


    22. 2nd LETTER FROM REPRESENTATIVE JIM GUEST - 8/10/08
    http://www.msnusers.com/JAMESWALBERTFILE/shoebox.msnw?action=ShowPh...


    JIM GUEST STATE REPRESENTATIVE MISSOURI
    DISTRICT ADDRESS
    P.O. BOX 412, KING CITY, MO 64463
    Tel: 660-535-6664

    To Whom It May Concern:

    I have worked for 3 years with Microwave and Electronic Harassment victims throughout the US and overseas. It is hard for others to understand the technology that is being used to destroy people’s lives. I know James because he contacted me for help. James has worked to find proof of what has happened to him.

    Many victims try hard to get help from professional doctors to help find devices such as Veri-Chip. I would request that you and those who can make a difference would help James and others to find answers.

    5th District State Representative


    23..THE TAOISEACH OF IRELAND - 8/10/08

    Dear Mr. Finch,

    I wish to acknowledge receipt of your e-mail of 3 October 2008 which will be brought to the Taoiseach's attention as soon as possible.

    Yours sincerely,

    David King
    Assistant Private Secretary to the Taoiseach

    Telephone: 01-6194020
    E-mail: privateoffice@taoiseach.gov.ie , Claire.HayesCurtin@taoiseach.gov.ie , itu@taoiseach.gov.ie

    The Department of the Taoiseach is committed to providing a professional, efficient and courteous service to all our customers. To view the Customer Charter, please click on
    http://www.taoiseach.gov.ie/index.asp?1ocID=181&docID=1762


    23. MR NIGEL FARRAGE, MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, from UKIP ( United Kingdom Independence and Democracy Party), BRUSSELS, EUROPE 30/1/09

    Dear Mr Finch

    Thank you for this account of your hideous experiences and the technology, which might have been used to occasion them.

    The UK Independence Party is supporting the initiative, by Dr Walter Madlinger, to demonstrate such matters to an expert audience, at the Ettlingen Conference on Non-Lethal Weapons, on 11th May, this year, and I would encourage you to attend, if you are not already planning to do so.

    Yours sincerely
    Andrew S. Reed
    (Office of Nigel Farage, Brussels)
    EMAIL: nigel.farage@europarl.europa.eu


    24. MR ANTHONY ROMERO, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ACLU, 13/2/09

    Dear John,

    Thank you for speaking out against the abuse of the "state secrets" doctrine. We know your time is limited, and we appreciate your efforts to protect civil liberties.

    The ACLU works daily in courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and laws of the United States guarantee everyone in this country. We need your support now more than ever as we work to restore liberties lost over the last eight years. If you have a moment, please make a donation today. Visit www.aclu.org/donate.

    Thanks again for taking action. We'll keep you up-to-date on this important legislation.

    Sincerely,
    Anthony D. Romero
    Executive Director, ACLU
    Executive_Director@aclu.org


    25. MR NIKIFOROUS DIAMANDOUROS, THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN, 28/5/09

    S2009-104176
    STRASBOURG 8/5/09
    COMPLAINT NUMBER: 1568/2006/(AVM)OV

    Dear Sir (Mr John Finch)

    I am writing in reply of your email of 9 April 2009 in which you come back on your earlier complaint 1568/2006/(AVM)OV.

    You allege that some extreme and horrendous criminality is being conducted by agencies related to the US government with the complicity of many other government and security agencies. You state that victims as you are being subjected to torture and mental and physical destruction and that this has remained completely unreported. You state that, more particularly, you are being completely mutilated and neutralised by electro-magnetic radiation and that you are “brain-broadcasted”.

    As I already informed you in my letters of 22 June and 14 September 2006, I have unfortunately no power to intervene in this matter, because your allegations are not directed against a European Union institution or body.

    However given that you are residing in Australia, I would like to repeat my earlier advice that, in case you have an allegation against an Australian government agency, you might consider contacting the Australian Ombudsman:

    Commonwealth Ombudsman
    National Office
    GPO Box 442, Canberra ACT 2601
    Ground Floor, I Farrell Place
    Canberra City ACT 2600
    http://www.comb.gov.au
    ombudsman@ombudsman.gov.au

    I regret I cannot be of further assistance.

    Yours sincerely,

    P. Nikiforos DIAMANDOROUS
    The European Ombudsman
    1 Ave President Robert Schumann – CS 30403 – F-67001 strasbourg Cedex
    TEL: 33 (0)3.88.172313 – fax: 33 (0)3.88.179062
    http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu – eo@ombudsman.europa.eu


    26. THE PREMIER OF NSW, AUSTRALIA, 6/8/09

    EA1470971 – HSJB

    Dear Mr Finch

    The Premier has received your recent email concerning your reported experiences in Russia, Turkey and China.

    As the subject you have raised primarily relates to areas of Australian Government responsibility, Mr Rees is unable to be of direct assistance.

    Accordingly, the opportunity has been taken to bring the terms of your approach to the attention of the Australian Government.

    Yours sincerely
    Emanuel Sklavounos
    for Director General


    27. PROF. DR. ADRIAN EUGEN HOLLAENDER, CENTER OF LEGAL RESEARCH, UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA, 11/8/09

    CENTER OF LEGAL RESEARCH,
    Prof. Dr. Adrian Eugen Hollaender,
    Chairman of The Austrian Fundamental Rights Conference,
    Human Rights Seminar Instructor at the University of Vienna

    Dear Mr. Finch:

    With great concern, I have read your complaint about ENERGY AND NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONS TORTURE, DEGRADATION AND MUTILATION CASE.

    If you wish, I could examine the case under the legal perspective and write a legal expertise on it that you can use in the complaint procedures.

    Sincerely,
    Prof. Hollaender
    Email: calix.hollaender@chello.at
This reply was deleted.