All Posts (12237)

Sort by

Five-big Ancient Chinese Groups and Their Cultures

Soleilmavis presented this paper at E-Leader Conference held by CASA (Chinese American Scholars Association) and Topica Education Group Vietnam in Jan 2020.

Abstract:

Shanhaijing (Classic of Mountains and Seas) records many ancient groups of people in Neolithic China. The five biggest were: Yan Di, Huang Di, Zhuan Xu, Di Jun and Shao Hao. They were names of groups instead of individuals. These groups first lived in the Pamirs Plateau, soon gathered in the north of the Tibetan Plateau and west of the Qinghai Lake and learned from each other advanced sciences and technologies, later spread out to other places of China and built their unique ancient cultures during the Neolithic Age.

Keywords: Shanhaijing; Neolithic China, Yan Di, Huang Di, Zhuan Xu, Di Jun, Shao Hao, the Great Yu, Erlitou, Ancient Chinese Civilization

Introduction

Shanhaijing (Classic of Mountains and Seas) records many ancient groups of people in Neolithic China. The five biggest were: Yan Di, Huang Di, Zhuan Xu, Di Jun and Shao Hao. They were names of groups instead of individuals. These groups first lived in the Pamirs Plateau, soon gathered in the north of the Tibetan Plateau and west of the Qinghai Lake and learned from each other advanced sciences and technologies, later spread out to other places of China and built their unique ancient cultures during the Neolithic Age.

The Yan Di’s offspring spread out to the west of the Taklamakan Desert; The Huang Di’s offspring spread out to the north of the Chishui River, Tianshan Mountains and further northern and northeastern areas; The Di Jun’s and Shao Hao’s offspring spread out to the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River, where the Di Jun’s offspring lived in the west of the Shao Hao’s territories, which were near sea or in the Shandong Peninsula. Modern archaeological discoveries have revealed the authenticity of Shanhaijing’s records.

 

Ancient Chinese Civilizations

Archaeologists and historians commonly agree that Neolithic China had two main ancient cultural systems: the Yellow River Valley and Changjiang River Valley Cultural Systems. Starting from the lower reaches areas of the Yellow and Changjiang rivers, these cultures spread to surrounding areas.

The Yellow River Valley Cultural System, which included Di Qiang and Dong Yi cultures, was established on millet cultivation in the early and middle stages of the Neolithic Age and divided from wheat cultivation in the Shandong Peninsula and eastern Henan Province and millet cultivation in other areas, during the period of Longshan Culture (about 3200-1900BCE).

Most small regional cultures of ancient China had faded by the end of Neolithic Age, including the Changjiang River Valley Cultural System. However, the Yellow River Valley Culture became the mainstay of ancient Chinese civilization and developed to a much higher level.

13456997663?profile=RESIZE_584x  

Di Qiang Culture

Di Qiang Neolithic Culture contained seven phases:

Laoguantai Culture (about 6000-5000BCE) existed in the Weihe River Valley, or Guanzhong Plain, in Shaanxi and Gansu provinces. Laoguantai people lived predominantly by primitive agriculture, mainly planting millet.

Qin’an Dadiwan First Culture (about 6200-3000BCE) included pre-Yangshao Culture, Yangshao Culture and Changshan Under-layer Culture. Dating from at least 6000BCE, Qin’an First Culture is the earliest Neolithic culture so far discovered in archaeological digs in the northwestern China. In a site of Dadiwan First Culture in Tianshui of Gansu in the west of the Guanzhong Plain, from around 6200BCE, archaeologists found the earliest cultivated millet.

Yangshao Culture (about 5000-3000BCE), also called Painted-Pottery Culture, existed in the middle reach of the Yellow River. Centered in Huashan, it reached east to eastern Henan Province, west to Gansu and Qinghai provinces, north to the Hetao area, the Great Band of Yellow River and the Great Wall near Inner Mongolia, and south to the Jianghan Plain. Its core areas were Guanzhong and northern Shaanxi Province. Like Laoguantai Culture, it was based predominantly on primitive agriculture, mainly the planting of millet.

Cishan-peiligang Culture (about 6200-4600BCE) existed in modern-day Henan Province and southern Hebei Province. Yangshao Culture later developed from this culture. The people subsisted on agriculture and livestock husbandry, planting millet and raising pigs.

Majiayao Culture (about 3000-2000BCE) was distributed throughout central and southern Gansu Province, centered in the Loess Plateau of western Gansu Province and spreading east to the upper reaches of the Weihe River, west to the Hexi (Gansu) Corridor and northeastern Qinghai Province, north to the southern Ningxia autonomous region and south Sichuan Province. From Majiayao Culture came the earliest Chinese bronzes and early writing characters, which evolved from Yangshao Culture’s written language. Maijayao people planted millet and raised pigs, dogs and goats.

Qijia Culture (about 2000-1000BCE) is also known as Early Bronze Culture. Its inhabitation areas were essentially coincident with Majiayao Culture. It had roots not only in Majiayao Culture, but also influences from cultures in the east of Longshan and the central Shaanxi Plain. Qijia Culture exhibited advanced pottery making. Copper-smelting had also appeared and Qijia people made small red bronzewares, such as knives, awls, mirrors and finger rings. The economy was based on planting millet and raising pigs, dogs, goats, cows and horses. Qijia Culture had a patriarchal clan society featuring monogamous families and polygamy. Class polarization had emerged.

Siwa Culture (about 1400-700BCE) existed mainly in the east of Lanzhou in Gansu Province and the Qianshui River and Jingshui River valleys in Shaanxi Province. Siwa settlements were of significant size and held a mixture of citizens and slaves. The Siwa people produced pottery with distinctive saddle-shaped mouths and bronzeware including dagger-axes, spears, arrowheads, knives and bells.

 

Dong Yi Culture

Dong Yi Culture was the most advanced culture in Neolithic China and built by the Neolithic Shao Hao People, who lived in the Shandong Peninsula. First located in the Shandong Peninsula, its influence later spread to the lower reaches of the Yellow and Huai rivers. Dawenkou Dong Yi Culture spread out to the lower reach of the Changjiang River and even the southeastern China. Dong Yi Culture had greatly impacted Di Qiang Culture since the earliest time. Longshan Dong Yi Culture spread out to the inhabitation areas of Cishan-peiligang and Yangshao Di Qiang cultures and turned these regions into outposts of Dong Yi Culture.

Dong Yi Neolithic Culture contained five evolutionary phases:

Houli Culture (about 6400-5700BCE) was a millet-growing culture in the Shandong Peninsula during the Neolithic Age. The original site at Houli in the Linzi District of Shandong, was excavated from 1989 to 1990.

Beixin Culture (about 5300-4100BCE) was a millet-growing Neolithic culture in the Shandong Peninsula, existing in the southern and northern Taishan and Yimengshan Mountains in the west of the Jiaolai River, including today’s Yanzhou, Qufu, Tai’an, Pingyin, Changqing, Jinan, Zhangqiu, Zouping, Wenshang, Zhangdian, Qingzhou, Juxian, Linshu, Lanlin and Tengzhou. It also spread out to today’s Xuzhou and Lianyungang. The original site at Beixin, in Tengzhou of Shandong Province, was excavated from 1978 to 1979.

Dawenkou Culture (about 4100-2600BCE) existed primarily in the Shandong Peninsula, but also appeared in Anhui, Henan and Jiangsu provinces. The typical site at Dawenkou, located in Tai’an of Shandong Province, was excavated in 1959, 1974 and 1978. As with Beixin and Houli cultures, the main food was millet.

Yueshi Culture (about 2000-1600BCE) appeared in the same areas as Longshan Culture. The original site at Yueshi, in Pingdu of Shandong Province, was excavated in 1959.

Longshan Culture (about 3200-1900BCE) was centered on the central and lower Yellow River, including Shandong, Henan and Shaanxi provinces, during the late Neolithic period. Longshan Culture was named after the town of Longshan in Jinan, Shandong Province, where the first site containing distinctive cultural artifacts was found in 1928 and excavated from 1930 to 1931.

Wheat was widely cultivated in the Shandong Peninsula and eastern Henan during Longshan Culture. An implied code of etiquette in Longshan Culture shows social stratification and formation of the nation.

Longshan artifacts reveal a high level of technical skill in pottery making, including the use of pottery wheels. Longshan Culture is noted for its highly polished egg-shell pottery. This type of thin-walled and polished black pottery has also been discovered in the Yangtze River Valley and as far away as today’s southeastern coast of China. It is a clear indication of how Neolithic agricultural sub-groups of the greater Longshan Culture spread out across the ancient boundaries of China.

The Neolithic population in China reached its peak during the time of Longshan Culture. Towards the end of the Longshan cultural period, the population decreased sharply; this was matched by the disappearance of high-quality black pottery from ritual burials.

Archaeologists and historians agree that so-called Longshan Culture is actually made up of different cultures from multiple sources. Longshan Culture is now identified as four different cultures according to inhabitation areas and appearance: Shandong Longshan Culture, Miaodigou Second Culture, Henan Longshan Culture and Shaanxi Longshan Culture. Only the Shandong Longshan Culture came purely from Yueshi (Dong Yi) Culture; the three other Longshan cultures were rooted in Di Qiang Culture, but deeply influenced by Dong Yi Culture, which had also influenced Di Qiang Culture earlier in the Neolithic age.

Shandong Longshan Culture (also called representative Longshan Culture, about 2500-2000BCE), was named after the town of Longshan in Jinan, Shandong Province, where the first archaeological site was found in 1928 and excavated from 1930 to 1931.

Miaodigou Second Culture (about 2900-2800BCE) was mainly distributed throughout western Henan Province and came from Yangshao Culture.

Henan Longshan Culture (about 2600-2000BCE) was mainly distributed in western, northern and eastern Henan Province and came from Miaodigou Second Culture.

Shaanxi Longshan Culture (about 2300-2000BCE) was mainly distributed in the Jinghe and Weihe River Valley in Shaanxi Province.

 

Dong Yi Culture was the Most Advanced Culture in Neolithic China.

1) The writing system of Dong Yi Culture is one of the oldest in Neolithic China. It was an important source of the Shang oracle bone script. Some of the characters continued to be used in modern Chinese writing, such as: [1]

13456997658?profile=RESIZE_400x 

The Changle Bone Inscriptions, found in Changle, Qingzhou, Shouguang, Huantai, Linzi and Zouping in Shandong Province, belonged to Longshan Culture and are regarded as recording characters used 1,000 years earlier than Shang oracle bone script. [2]

2) The Shao Hao People were the inventors of arrows in China. Zuozhuan has the similar records as Shuowen Jiezi: Shibu, saying, “In ancient times, Yi Mu started making the bow and arrow.” Liji: Sheyi says, “Hui made the bow and Yi Mu made the arrow.”

3) The Shao Hao People had great skill in making pottery. Longshan Culture’s eggshell black pottery is regarded as one of the best ancient Chinese pottery.

4) The Shao Hao People were the earliest users of copper and iron in Neolithic China.

5) The earliest human brain operation in Neolithic China was believed to be conducted about 5,000 years ago in Guangrao of Shandong. In an archaeological site of Dawenkou Culture in Fujia, Guangrao of Shandong, an adult male skull was discovered. A hole on the skull with very neat edges was believed by scientists to have been created by a craniotomy. The man recovered from the surgery and had lived for a long time after it, before he died.

6) The Shao Hao People firstly developed etiquette in Neolithic China. A code of etiquette in Longshan Culture, implied by artifacts, such as Ceremonial architecture, sacrificial vessels (Eggshell black pottery and Ritual Jade) and animal bones used to practice divination, shows social stratification and formation of the Shao Hao nation. Clearly, the earliest nation of Neolithic China was built in the Shandong Peninsula by the Shao Hao People.

 

The Changjiang River Valley Cultural System included:

(1) The rice-growing cultures in the lower reach of the Changjiang River, such as:

Hemudu Culture (about 5000-3300BCE) in Yuyao of Zhejiang; Majiabang Culture (about 5000-4000BCE) in Jiaxing of Zhejiang and its successors, Songze Culture (about 3800-2900BCE) in Qingpu District of Shanghai, and Liangzhu Culture (about 5300-4200BCE) near Taihu of Zhejiang.

Their main cultivated food was rice. Many painted-potteries and also a large numbers of black potteries, discovered in these sites, suggests they had been influenced by Dawenkou Culture, which had spread out from the Shandong Peninsula to the eastern Anhui, Henan and Jiangsu.

2) The rice-growing cultures in the middle reach of the Changjiang River, such as:

Pengtoushan Culture (about 8200-7800BCE) in Li County of Hunan, Daxi Culture (about 4400-3300BCE) in Wushan County of Chongqing and Qujialing (about 2550-2195BCE) in Jingshan County of Hubei.

Their main cultivated food was rice. Potteries discovered in Pengtoushan are only red brown painted-pottery and in Daxi are mainly red painted-pottery, but in Qujialing are mainly black and grey pottery. Patterns of painted-potteries in Daxi show clear connection with Miaodigou type of Yangshao Culture, suggesting that Yangshao Culture had deeply influenced Daxi Culture. Black potteries discovered in Qujialing have some similarities with Longshan Culture, suggesting that Longshan Culture had deeply influenced Qujialing Culture and its successors.

 

Other Cultural Systems included:

  1. The millet-growing cultures in the southeastern Da Xing’an Ling Mountains, include:

Xiaohexi Culture (about 6500BCE) in Aohan Banner; Xinglongwa Culture (about 6200-5400BCE) in Xinglongwa Village of Baoguotu Township in Aohan Banner of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region and its successors, Zhaojiagou Culture (about 5200-4400BCE) in Aohan Banner and Hongshan Culture (about 4000-3000BCE), which have been found in an area stretching from Inner Mongolia to Liaoning. Their main cultivated food was millet.

Xinglongwa sites discover the earliest jade objects and a stone pile with dragon shape. Clay figurines, including figurines of pregnant women, are found throughout Hongshan sites. Hongshan burial artifacts include small copper rings and some of the earliest known examples of jade working, especially its jade pig dragons and embryo dragons. The dragon shape stone pile in Xinglongwa and jade dragons in Hongshan suggest the earliest dragon worship in ancient China.

  1. Dalongtan Culture(about 4500BCE)situated at Long’an County of Guangxi Province. Main cultivated food was rice.
  2. Dabenkeng Culture (about 4000-3000BCE) appeared in northern Taiwan and spread around the coast of the island, as well as the Penghu islands to the west. The rope figure potteries found in Dabenkeng are similar with Hemudu, Majiabang and Liangzhu. German archaeologist Robert Heine Geldern thought that Dabenkeng Culture also spread from Taiwan to Philippines and Polynesia.
  3. Sanxingdui Culture(about 12000-3000BCE)

The site of Sanxingdui is located in the city of Guanghan, 40km from Chengdu, Sichuan Province. Archaeologists have discovered remains of human activity in Sanxingdui about 12,000 years BP. The archaeological site of Sanxingdui contains remains of Bronze Age culture. The culture of the Sanxingdui site is thought to be divided into several phases. The Sanxingdui Culture (about 5,000-3,000 years BP), which corresponds to periods II-III of the site, was an obscure civilization in southern China. This culture was contemporaneous with the Shang Dynasty. However, they developed a different method of bronze-making from the Shang. The first phase, which corresponds to Period I of the site, belongs to the Baodun and in the final phase (period IV) the culture merged with the Ba and Chu cultures. The culture was a strong central theocracy with trade links that brought bronze from Yin and ivory from Southeast Asia.

The most obvious difference, between Sanxingdui and the Chinese Bronze Age cultures of Henan, is the presence at Sanxingdui of a figural bronze tradition – statues, heads, and faces - without precedent elsewhere in China. The Sanxingdui Culture ended, possibly either as a result of natural disasters (evidence of massive flooding has been found), or invasion by a different culture.

Archaeologists have discovered the archaeological sites of jinsha near Chengdu, 50 kilometers to Sanxingdui. The cultural relics of Jinsha Culture (about 1250-650BCE) share similarities with Sanxingdui, but some of Jinsha’s relics share similarities with Liangzhu Culture (5300-4200BCE) in the lower reach of the Changjiang River. Historians believe that the Jinsha People came from Sanxingdui, but had influenced by the Changjiang River Valley cultures.

 

Shanhaijing, the Classic of Mountains and Seas

Shanhaijing, or Classic of Mountains and Seas, is a classic Chinese text compiling early geography and myth. Some people believe it is the first geography and history book in China. It is largely a fabulous geographical and cultural account of pre-Qin China as well as a collection of Chinese mythology. The book is about 31,000 words long and is divided into eighteen sections. It describes, among other things, over 550 mountains and 300 rivers. Versions of the text have existed since the fourth century BCE, but the present form was not reached until the early Han Dynasty (202BCE-220CE), a few centuries later.

It is also commonly accepted that Shanhaijing is a compilation of four original books:

1): Wu Zang Shan Jing, or Classic of the Five Hidden Mountains, passed from mouth to mouth during the Great Yu’s Time (before 2200BCE);

2): Hai Wai Si Jing, or Four Classic of Regions Beyond the Seas, passed from mouth to mouth during the period of the Xia’s time (about 2070-1600BCE);

3): Da Huang Si Jing, or Four Classic of the Great Wilderness, written during the Shang Dynasty (about 1600-1046BCE); and

4): Hai Nei Wu Jing, or Five Classic of Regions Within the Seas, written during the Zhou Dynasty (about 1046-256BCE).

The first known editor of Shanhaijing was Liu Xiang (77-6BCE) in the Han Dynasty, who was particularly well-known for his bibliographic work in cataloging and editing the extensive imperial library. [3] Later, Guo Pu (276-324CE), a scholar from the Jin Dynasty (also known as Sima Jin, 265-420CE), further annotated the work. [4]

 

Where was the Great Wilderness recorded in Shanhaijing? 

According to Shanhaijing, the Great Wilderness was a large tract of savage land that unfit for human habitation and was in the south of the Mobile Desert, today’s Taklamakan Desert. Clearly, it included today’s Tibetan Plateau, west areas of the Sichuan Basin and western Yungui Plateau. Shanhaijing also mentioned “east wilderness” and “other wilderness,” which were not today’s Tibetan Plateau, but other savage lands that unfit for human habitation.

In Shanhaijing, the He (literally means river and hereinafter written as Yellow River) refers specificly to the Yellow River, which rises in the northern Bayankala Mountains, which are located in the northeastern Tibetan Plateau, and the Jiang (hereinafter written as Changjiang River) refers specificly to the Changjiang River, which rises in the southern Bayankala Mountains.

Shanhaijing uses Shui (literally means water) to name other rivers and waters.

Shanhaijing uses Hai (literally means sea) to name sea and saltwater lake and uses Ze, Chi and Yuan to name freshwater pool and lake.

13456997465?profile=RESIZE_584x 

The Mobile Desert in Shanhaijing refers to today’s Taklamakan Desert, the Asia’s biggest and world’s second biggest mobile desert, while the Rub Al Khal Desert in the Arabian Peninsula is the world’s biggest desert.

 The Chishui River in Shanhaijing was located in the east of the Mobile Desert, today’s Taklamakan Desert, and the west of the Northwest Sea.

The Northwest Sea is today’s Qinghai Lake. The Qinghai Lake, also called Kokonor Lake, is a saltwater lake and used to be very big, but it had reduced to 1,000 kilometers in perimeter in the North Wei Dynasty (386-557CE) and kept reducing to 400 kilometers in perimeter in the Tang Dynasty (618-907CE) and 360 kilometers in perimeter today.

The areas to the west of today’s Dunhuang have been called the Western Regions of China since the Han Dynasty (202BCE-220CE).

13456997473?profile=RESIZE_710x 

Where was Mount Buzhou?

The Classic of the Mountains: West records, “Mount Buzhou was located in the northwest of Mount Chang Sha, 370 li away. Mount Zhu Bi was to the north and Mount Yue Chong was next to it; Lake Ao Ze lay to the east. From Mount Buzhou 420 li to the northwest was Mount Mi, where Huang Di lived in and ate jade ointment; another 420 li to the northwest was Mount Zhong; another 480 li to the northwest was Mount Tai Qi; another 320 li to the west was Mount Huai Jiang; another 400 li to the southwest was Kun Lun Mound, (which is not today’s Kunlun Mountain); another 370 li to the west was Mount Le You; another 400 li to the west was the desert. From Mount Le You 350 li to the northwest was Mount Yu, where the Western Queen Mother lived in; another 480 li to the west was Xuan Yuan Mound; another 300 li to the west was Mount Ji Shi; another 200 li to the west was Mount Chang Liu (hereinafter written as Changliu), where Shao Hao was respected as the White King or White Ancestor-god.”

The Classic of the Great Wilderness: West records, “Mount Buzhou was located in the region beyond the Northwest Sea (today’s Qinghai Lake), the border of the Great Wilderness.”

Wang Yi, a scholar of the Eastern Han Dynasty (25-220CE), thought Mount Buzhou was located in the northwest of the Kunlun Mountains.

Many current scholars believe that Mount Buzhou was located in the eastern Pamirs Plateau, to the west of the Kunlun Mountains, but the specific location is not confirmed.

 13456997274?profile=RESIZE_710x

 Shanhaijing’s records of Neolithic Chinese People

Five Biggest Groups of Neolithic Chinese People had Lived in the Pamirs Plateau before They Moved to other Places of China.

The Classic of the Mountains: West records that Huang Di (Yellow King) lived in Mount Mi. The word “Huang (yellow)” suggests that Huang Di had a clear Mongoloid racial characteristic - yellow skin. It also records that Shao Hao was respected as Bai Di, “White King” or “White Ancestor-god,” by people in Mount Changliu. The word “Bai (white)” suggests that Shao Hao had a clear Caucasoid racial characteristic - white skin. The fact that the Chang Liu People regarded Shao Hao as their “White King” or “White Ancestor-god” indicates that the Chang Liu People were offspring of the Shao Hao. Mount Mi and Changliu were located in today’s Pamirs Plateau. Today, we shall comprehend that Huang Di refers to Huang Di’s group due to they living in the matriarchal clan society before 8,000 years BP, so did Yan Di, Shao Hao, Zhuan Xu and Di Jun.

The Classic of the Great Wilderness: East tells that Shu Shi, Zhuan Xu’s son, lived near Mount Buzhou, also The Classic of the Great Wilderness: West says, “The Yu People (Di Jun’s offspring) fought with the Gong Gong People (Zhuan Xu’s offspring) in the Guo Mountain near Mount Buzhou,” suggesting Zhuan Xu’s group lived near Mount Buzhou in the Pamirs.

Shanhaijing does not give information about Di Jun living in the Pamirs Plateau, but records some groups of the Di Jun’s offspring living in the Pamirs Plateau or northwestern Tibetan Plateau, including King Shun’s group who lived near the “Chong Yuan Lake” in the northwestern Tibetan Plateau, the Yu People who lived near Mount Buzhou, and the Hou Ji and Tai Xi People who lived near the Ji Lake in the west of Mount Huai Jiang near Mount Buzhou. Clearly, Di Jun’s group used to live near Mount Buzhou, their offspring moved to the northern Tibetan Plateau and had a lot of wars with Zhuan Xu’s offspring.

Shanhaijing does not contain any detail of Yan Di living in the Pamirs Plateau, but clearly records that Ling Jia, Yan Di’s great-grandson, and Hu Ren, Yan Di’s great-great-grandson, lived in the west of the Taklamakan Desert. Drawing inferences about other cases from Huang Di, Shao Hao, Zhuan Xu and Di Jun, we can say that Yan Di’s group used to live near the Pamirs Plateau, later their offspring moved to the west of the Taklamakan Desert.

The Classic of the Great Wilderness: West tells us, “In the west of the Qinghai Lake and a corner of the Tibetan Plateau, there was Mount Buzhou. There were ten spirits (gods). It said that Nüwa’s intestines scattered into ten spirits; they lived in millet fields and slept on roads.” “Ten spirits” came from Nüwa and under her jurisdiction, lived near Mount Buzhou. This reveals that all ancient Chinese people, including the five biggest groups, regarded Nüwa as the Goddess since their early time.

Due to all ancient groups of Chinese people used to live in the Pamirs Plateau, they might have moved to the south areas of the Himalayan Mountains to the Indo-Gangetic Plain and contributed as some origins of the Ancient Indus Valley civilizations (about 3000-1700BCE). In this article, I will not discuss this. I will only talk about those ancient groups of people who moved to China and built ancient Chinese civilizations.

 

The Second Gathering Areas of Neolithic Chinese People were the West of the Qinghai Lake, East of the Taklamakan Desert and North of the Tibetan Plateau.

Shanhaijing records that many groups of people lived in the west of the Qinghai Lake and north of the Tibetan Plateau, including offspring of the Zhuan Xu, Di Jun, Huang Di, Shao Hao, Yan Di and other peoples, such as the Xi (west) Zhou, Bei (north) Qi and Xuan Yuan People.

 

In the west of the Taklamakan Desert, there lived:

(1) People recorded in TheClassic of the Great Wilderness: West -

The Western Queen Mother lived in Mount Yu in the western Pamirs Plateau.

The Hu Ren (also called Di Ren) People were ancestors of the Di Qiang People. Yan Di’s grandson was the father of Ling Jia; Ling Jia was the father of Hu Ren.

Yu Fu was the son of Zhuan Xu. Later the Yu Fu People turned their totem from snake (or animals) to fish and recovered from death.

2) People recorded in The Classic of the Mountains: West -

The Western Queen Mother lived in Mount Yu; the Xuan Yuan People lived in the Xuan Yuan Mound; Huang Di lived in Mount Mi and Shao Hao lived in Mount Changliu. They were all in today’s Pamirs Plateau.

 

In the northwest of the Tibetan Plateau, near Mount Buzhou, there lived:

 Shu Shi, son of Zhuan Xu, recorded in The Classic of the Great Wilderness: West. Also “The Yu People (Di Jun’s offspring) fought with the Gong Gong People (Zhuan Xu’s offspring) in the Guo Mountain near Mount Buzhou.”

 

In the west of the Chishui River and east of the Taklamakan Desert, there lived:

(1) People recorded in TheClassic of the Great Wilderness: West -

The Bei (north) Di People were offspring of Shi Jun, who was grandson of Huang Di.

Tai Zi Chang Qin, who lived in Mount Yao and started making music, was the son of Zhu Rong. Zhuan Xu was the father of Lao Tong; Lao Tong was the father of Zhu Rong. Later, the Zhu Rong People moved to the east of the Chishui River and lived in the far south of the Di Mountain, recorded in The Classic of Regions Beyond the Sea: South.

2) People recorded in The Classic of the Great Wilderness: North -

The Zhong Bian People were descendants of Zhong Bian, son of Zhuan Xu.

 

In the northern Tibetan Plateau, there lived:

(1) People recorded in TheClassic of the Great Wilderness: West -

The Xuan Yuan People moved from the Xuan Yuan Mound in the Pamirs Plateau to the northern Tibetan Plateau and their life-span was more than 800 years. (In ancient China, people often used eight, eighty or eight hundreds to mean a lot.)

The San Mian People were descendants of San Mian, son of Zhuan Xu.

The Ye People, who lived in the westernmost place of the Tibetan Plateau, were offspring of Li. Zhuan Xu was the father of Lao Tong; Lao Tong was the father of Chong and Li.

2) People recorded in The Classic of the Great Wilderness: North -

Shao Hao was the father of Wei, who had only one eye in the center of his face. The Wei People, with the surname of Wei, ate millet.

The Bei (north) Qi People (Jiang Zi-ya’s ancestors).

The Shu Chu People were descendants of Shu Chu, son of Zhuan Xu.

The Quan Rong People ate meat. Huang Di was the father of Miao Long; Miao Long was the father of Rong Wu; Rong Wu was the father of Nong Ming; Nong Ming was the father of Bai Quan, also called Quan Rong.

The Kua Fu People. Hou Tu was the father of Sin; Sin was the father of Kua Fu.

The Ba People (descended from Ba, Huang Di’s daughter).

3) People recorded in The Classic of the Great Wilderness: South

King Shun’s group (Di Jun’s offspring) bathed in the Chong Yuan Lake.

 

In the west of the Qinghai Lake and east of the Chishui River, there lived the Xi (west) Zhou People (the Zhou Dynasty’s ancestors) with the surname of Ji, who ate millet, recorded in The Classic of the Great Wilderness: West.

Shu Jun started practicing cultivating grains. Di Jun was the father of Hou Ji and Tai Xi; Tai Xi was the father of Shu Jun.

Yu Hao was the father of Yan Er. Yan Er was the father of Wu Gu. Wu Gu was the father of Ji Wu Min. Both the Yan Er People, who ate millet, and the Ji Wu Min People, who ate fish, had the surname of Ren.

The Guan Tou People and Miao Min People had the surname of Li. Zhuan Xu was the ancestor of Guan Tou; The Guan Tou were the ancestors of Miao Min.

Later the Guan Tou People moved to the south of today’s Tibetan Plateau and fish in the sea (highly possible today’s sea near Dhaka of Bangladesh), recorded in The Classic of the Great Wilderness: South. Gun’s wife Shi Jing gave birth to Yan Rong; Yan Rong was the father of Guan Tou.  

Shanhaijing does not give time sequence when recording locations of ancient groups of people, but gives us clues to find out the time sequence. These clues lead to a conclusion that Huang Di’s, Yan Di’s, Zhuan Xu’s, Di Jun’s and Shao Hao’s groups spread out from the Pamirs Plateau to the north of the Tibetan Plateau, west of the Qinghai Lake and east of the Taklamakan Desert, excepting Yan Di’s offspring, who spread out to the west and north of the Taklamakan Desert; Yu Fu’s group (offspring of Zhuan Xu) also moved to that area.

The Classic of the Great Wilderness: North tells that Wei, son of Shao Hao, lived in the north of the Tibetan Plateau, suggesting the Shao Hao People spread out from Mount Changliu in the Pamirs Plateau to the north of the Tibetan Plateau.

The Classic of the Great Wilderness: North says that Zhuan Xu and his nine wives were buried on Mount Fuyu, which was located between the Yellow River beyond the Qinghai Lake, suggesting that the Zhuan Xu People spread out from the eastern Pamirs to Mount Fuyu in today’s Aemye Ma-chhen Range.

The Classic of the Great Wilderness: South says King Shun lived in the northwestern Tibetan Plateau; also Di Jun (Di Ku), King Yao, King Shun and Shu Jun (grandson of Di Jun) were buried in the same place on the Yueshan Mountain. The Classic of the Great Wilderness: West says the Yu People fought with the Gong Gong People in the Guo Mountain near Mount Buzhou; also Shu Jun’s group lived in the west of the Qinghai Lake and east of the Chishui River. These records hint us that the Di Jun People spread out from the Pamirs to the northern Tibetan Plateau and begat many groups, such as the Yao, Shun and Yu People, also the Hou Ji, Tai Xi and Shu Jun People, who lived in the east of the Chishui River and west of the Qinghai Lake.

Huang Di’s group lived in Mount Mi in the Pamirs Plateau, while their offspring, the Miao Long, Rong Wu, Nong Ming, Bai Quan, or Quan (Xi) Rong, lived in the north of the Tibetan Plateau and the Shi Jun and Bei (north) Di lived in the west of the Chishui River.

The Xuan Yuan People spread out from the Xuan Yuan Mound in the Pamirs Plateau to the northern Tibetan Plateau.

 

Wars recorded in Shanhaijing.

Shanhaijing records many wars between different groups of people and these wars led to some agreements of their shifting routes.

One of these famous wars happened between the Chi You People (offspring of Zhuan Xu) and the Ying Long People (offspring of Huang Di).

Shanhaijing records Zhuan Xu had at least nine wives and many sons, more than Yan Di, Huang Di, Di Jun and Shao Hao. The followings are Zhuan Xu’s sons: Yu Fu, Shu Shi, Shu Chu, San Mian, Zhong Bian, Lao Tong, who was the father of Zhu Rong (who was Tai Zi Chang Qin’s father), Chong and Li (who was Ye’s father). The Zhuan Xu’s offspring also include Hou Tu, Sin’s father and Kua Fu’s grandfather, also Gun, who and his wife Shi Jing were the parents of Yan Rong, Guan Tou’s father and Miao Min’s grandfather. There were many groups of people who were offspring of Zhuan Xu’s group and they could outnumber others when they lived in the west of the Qinghai Lake.

The Chi You People had a sense of “safety in numbers” and launched an offensive to the Huang Di People, who had fewer groups. The Ying Long People took up the challenge and killed the Chi You People with the help of the Ba People (offspring of Huang Di’s daughter Ba). Later, the Kua Fu People (offspring of Zhuan Xu) moved to the east and became far away from other Zhuan Xu’s offspring, the Ying Long seized the chance and killed the Kua Fu People. After killing the Chi You and Kua Fu, the Ying Long were afraid of retribution from Zhuan Xu’s offspring, they escaped to the south and later moved to Mound Xiong Li Tu Qiu in the north of the eastern mountains.

Another famous war happened between the Ba People and Shu Jun People (offspring of Di Jun). After the Ying Long went to the south, the Ba People, who had come to help the Ying Long, lived in the west of the Qinghai Lake. They had conflicts with the Shu Jun People. After negotiation, the Ba People believed their Ancestor-god Huang Di asked them to move to the north of the Chishui River. These stories hint us that ancient groups of Chinese people made an agreement after these wars, that the Huang Di’s offspring would live in the north of the Chishui River and move to the northern areas, matching Shanhaijing’s records of their later inhabitation areas.

The Classic of the Great Wilderness: South records, “The Yu People launched an offensive against the Yun Yu People in the Yun Yu Mountain in the northern Tibetan Plateau.” The Classic of the Great Wilderness: North says, “The Yu People killed Xiang Yao, Gong Gong’s minister, in the north of the Kunlun Mountains.” Also The Classic of the Great Wilderness: West tells, “The Yu People fought with the Gong Gong People in the Guo Mountain near Mount Buzhou.” Clearly, the Di Jun’s and Zhuan Xu’s offspring fought a lot when they lived in the west of the Qinghai Lake. After these wars, they might have reached an agreement - Zhuan Xu’s offspring would go to the south, while Di Jun’s offspring would go to east. Such migration routes matched Shanhaijing’s records of their later inhabitation areas.

“Shao Hao nurturing the immature Zhuan Xu and the Zhuan Xu discarding their musical instruments - Qin and Se,” recorded in The Classic of the Great Wilderness: East, hint us that the Shao Hao People mastered the most advanced sciences and technologies and the Zhuan Xu People built close relationship with them in their early time, learned eagerly from them and discarded musical instruments, which were first invented by Tai Zi Chang Qin. Due to the Shao Hao mastering most advanced technologies, all other peoples would like to build close relationships with them, therefore, Shanhaijing has no records of Shao Hao’s offspring fighting with other peoples in their early time.

 

Neolithic Chinese People spread out from the Pamirs to the West of the Qinghai Lake and East of the Taklamakan Desert, then to other places.

The Huang Di, Zhuan Xu, Di Jun and Shao Hao People, and some other peoples, such as the Xuan Yuan, Xi (west) Zhou and Bei (north) Qi People, spread out from the Pamirs Plateau to the west of the Qinghai Lake and east of the Taklamakan Desert, lived nomadic lifestyle side by side, hunting animal, collecting millet and learning from each other. Within five to six generations, they had mastered many new sciences and technologies, Tai Zi Chang Qin (Zhuan Xu’s great-grandson) was the progenitor of making music instruments and Shu Jun (Di Jun’s grandson) was the progenitor of practicing cultivating grains.

After some wars, ancient Chinese people made some agreements. The Huang Di People moved to the north of the Chishui River, Tianshan Mountains and further northern and northeastern areas. Most of the Zhuan Xu People lived near the Tibetan Plateau and later some of them moved to the south, such as the Zhu Rong People, reached the Sichuan Basin, such as the Yu Fu People, and the Bay of Bengal, such as the Guan Tou People. The Shao Hao and Di Jun People moved to the east to the Weihe River Valley.

Of course, there were also possibly very few groups from the Di Jun, Zhuan Xu and Shao Hao going to the north, or going to the south; due to the fact that they were not the majority, we would not discuss them.

 

The Third Gathering Area of Neolithic Chinese People was the Weihe River Valley.

The Shao Hao and Di Jun People spread out to the Weihe River Valley.

(Ancient Chinese people named Mount Hua in Huayin City of Shaanxi Province, the West Sacred Mountain; while named Mount Tai in Shandong Province, the East Sacred Mountain. The God of Mount Hua was Shao Hao, the White Ancestor-God. Qin Shi-huang, 259-210BCE, was the first emperor who offered sacrifice to Mount Hua. Emperors of the Han, Tang, Song, Ming and Qing all offered sacrifices to Mount Hua.)

The Zhuan Xu People, who lived in the Aemye Ma-chhen Range, were very near the Weihe River Valley and had the ability to move to the Weihe Plain. However, due to the fact that the Zhuan Xu People had many wars with the Di Jun, it is highly possible that the Di Jun People did not allow the Zhuan Xu People to enter the Weihe Plain. This matches Shanhaijing having no records of the Zhuan Xu People living in the central and eastern China.

 

Archaeological Findings Match Shanhaijing’s Records of Ancient Groups of Chinese People.

Neolithic Chinese People Spread Out from the Pamirs Plateau to the East to Other Places of China.

Current humans share a common group of ancestors who were late Modern Humans (Homo sapiens sapiens) and who became the only surviving human species on Earth about 20,000 years ago. This latest human species, Homo sapiens sapiens, our ancestors, soon entered the Neolithic, a period in the development of human technology. The Neolithic period began in some parts of the Middle East about 18,000 years BP according to the ASPRO chronology (others said about 10200BCE) and later in other parts of the world and ended between 4500BCE and 2000BCE. In my paper, the Neolithic Age was from 16000BCE to 2000BCE.

About 20,000-19,000 years BP, in the end of the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) period, vast ice sheets covered much of North America, northern Europe and Asia; many high mountains were covered by snow and ice. The world’s sea level was about 130 meters lower than today, due to the large amount of sea water that had evaporated and been deposited as snow and ice, mostly in the Laurentide ice sheet. At the later stage of the Pleistocene since about 18,000 years BP, temperature rose quickly and snow and ice started melting, including the Pamirs Plateau and Tibetan Plateau. [5]

Archaeologists have found a lot of remains of human activity 10,000 years ago in China, including Zhaojiaxuyao Village (about 13,200 years BP) in Linzi of Zibo, (in where the earliest pottery of ancient China was discovered); Bianbian cave (about 12,000-9,000 years BP) of Yiyuan in Shandong; Zhuan’nian site (10,000-9,200 years BP) of Huairou County, Beijing; Nazhuantou (10,500-9,700 years BP) of Xushui in Henan; Yujiagou (lower layer) site (14,000-8,000 years BP) of Yangyuan County of Hebei;  Baoding (10,000 years BP) of Hebei; Ji County (before 10,000 years BP) of Tianjin; Yuchanyan of Dao County in Hunan (about 12,000BCE), Diaotonghuan (10,000 years BP) in Jiangxi; Qinglong County (before 10,000 years BP) of Guizhou; Sanxingdui (phase I) in Chengdu of Sichuan (about 12,000-5000 years BP); Baozitou (10,000 years BP) of Nanning in Guangxi; Yingde of Guangdong (about 11000-8000BCE); and Qideharen (12000-2000BCE) of Habahe County in the northwestern Altay Shan Mountains. In 2013, Hou Guang-liang, the professor of the School of Life and Geography Science of Qinghai Normal University, and other archaeologists of the Cultural Relics and Archaeology Institute of Qinghai discovered remains of human activity about 11,200-10,000 years BP in Xiadawu of Maqin County, Golog Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture of Qinghai Province.

Archaeologists confirm that rice cultivation history occurred earlier than millet in China. Neolithic Chinese people went from gathering to cultivating millet around 11,000 years BP, when the sea level was about 20-30 meters lower than today; In fact, cultivated rice from as early as 14,000 years BP has been discovered in many Chinese Neolithic archaeological sites in southern China. These include sites in Dao County of Hunan (about 12000BCE), Wannian County of Jiangxi (about 10,000 years BP) and Yingde of Guangdong (about 11000-8000BCE). These prove that ancestors of modern humans had lived all over China and learned how to farm at least 16,000-14,000 years ago.

 

13456996873?profile=RESIZE_710x 

Shanhaijing identifies about 150 groups of people, who came from the five biggest groups of people and played important roles in building ancient Chinese civilization. The five most famous groups were the Zhuan Xu, Di Jun, Huang Di, Yan Di and Shao Hao; they all worshipped Highest Goddess Nüwa since their earliest time. These groups first lived in the Pamirs Plateau and their offspring moved to the east and spread out to all over China.

Shanhaijing’s records and archaeological findings bring us a scientific conclusion. The Pamirs Plateau was very cold and unfit for human habitation before 16,000 years BP. As temperature rising, people, who lived in the Pamirs Plateau found that in the east of the Pamirs, there were vast fertile lands, they moved quickly from the Pamirs to the east and spread out to many places of China during about 16,000-14,000 years BP. The early ancient Chinese people lived nomadic lifestyle, moved frequently and were not able to leave much archaeological remains to us. However, when the Neolithic Chinese people started cultivating grains, they were able to settle down and left many archaeological remains.

Archaeologists agree that ancient Chinese people were in the matriarchal clan society before about 8,000 years BP, when human knew only mother, not father and accepted only endogamy within the same race.

In prehistoric China, people usually named their groups after certain ancestors. Shanhaijing records many ancient groups of people and names a group of people with “Guo,” its literal meaning is nation or tribe. Shanhaijing does not identify patriarchal ancestors of most ancient groups of people due to the long-time of matriarchal clan society. However, Shanhaijing clearly identifies some individual’s patriarchal clans and around 150 groups of Neolithic people, which came from the five biggest groups of people: Yan Di, Huang Di, Zhuan Xu, Di Jun and Shao Hao. These were not only the names of groups, but also the names of individuals, who were regarded by many groups as common male ancestors.

When the patriarchal clan society began in about 8,000 years BP, almost all ancient Chinese people still accepted only endogamy within same race, those people, who believed that they were offspring of Huang Di’s group, tried to compile their patriarchal clans and claimed Huang Di was their common male ancestor. However, they were not able to ascertain which particular individual was Huang Di, due to Huang Di living in the matriarchal clan society - his group had female as a leader and he, a male, was not able to be a leader. Clearly, Huang Di was only a figure from compilation, not a real person. Or, Huang (Yellow) Di (King or Queen) originally was a female leader but people in the patriarchal clan society claimed that he was a male leader. Today, we shall comprehend that Huang Di refers to Huang Di’s group. The Huang Di People refer to all people who were offspring of Huang Di’s group and regarded Huang Di as their common male ancestor. So did Yan Di, Shao Hao, Zhuan Xu and Di Jun.

While most geographical positions written in Shanhaijing cannot be verified, Shanhaijing still provides some hints to let us know the homelands of ancient groups of people.

 

The Movement of the Five Big Groups During the Neolithic Age.

The Yan Di People

The Yan Di People spread out from the Pamirs Plateau to the west of the Taklamakan Desert, later spread out to the north and northwest of the Tianshan Mountains, also west of the Pamirs Plateau, from where spread out to the south and then to southeastern Asia and Oceania. They were nomadic people and did not develop agriculture during the Neolithic Age.

Shanhaijing records the Yan Di gave birth to a group of people, who gave birth to Ling Jia; the Ling Jia gave birth to Hu Ren (also named Di Ren or Di Qiang); they lived in the west of the Taklamakan Desert.

From the west of the Taklamakan Desert, they might spread out to the west, south and north.

(1) They spread out to the west of the Pamirs Plateau, and from where they spread out to the south, then to southern and southeastern Asia and Oceania.

(2) They spread out to the north, to the west, southwest or northwest to Kazakhskiy Melkosopochnik, Baraba steppe, Ishim Grassland, Yablonovyy Khrebet Mountains. 

Shanhaijing has little records for the Yan Di’s offspring, suggesting they did not have many offspring. The Yan Di and Huang Di People lived as neighbors in the early time, but when some of the Huang Di People moved further to the north, northwest and northeast, they might driven away the Yan Di’s offspring from the north to the south. 

Shanhaijing records the Yan Di’s daughter Nü Wa (not Goddess Nüwa), who drowned in the Eastern Sea (today’s Sea of Japan) and became a Jing Wei Bird. This hints that only one group of the Yan Di People used to move to the northeast and reached the Sea of Japan, but perished. However, some remained Nü Wa women found the Di Jun men to procreate and left progeny - the Hei Chi People, surname Jiang, who lived in the west of the Shandong Peninsula.

 

The Huang Di People

The Huang Di People spread out from Mount Mi in the Pamirs Plateau to the east of the Taklamakan Desert and west of the Qinghai Lake. After wars, the Huang Di People moved to the north of the Chishui River, excepting one group, the Ying Long People, who had killed the Chi You and Kua Fu, went to the south and some of the Ying Long’s offspring moved to the north of the eastern mountains. From the north of the Chishui River, the Huang Di People spread out to the northern areas. Their migration routes were:

(1) First, to the north of the Altun Mountains, Qilian Mountains, Helan Mountains, north of the middle reach of the Yellow River and Yinshan Mountains. Huang Di’s offspring, who lived in these areas, were nomadic people and did not develop agriculture during the Neolithic Age. 

The Mount Helan Rock Paintings, 56 kilometers north of Yinchuan of Ningxia, were created by artists living in the area in different periods from about 10,000-1,000 years BP, forming historical accumulation of multi-cultures. Most of the Mount Helan Rock Paintings represent ancient hunting cultures from different northern nomadic groups. The Huang Di’s, Di Jun’s and Shao Hao’s offspring all had the ability to reach this area. Due to the Shu Jun (the Di Jun’s offspring) having expelled the Ba (the Huang Di’s offspring) to the north, therefore, the Huang Di’s offspring only occupied a very small percentage in Mount Helan.)

(2)  Second, to the north to the Kazakhskiy Melkosopochnik and its surrounding areas; further north to the Baraba steppe, Ishim Grassland, Yablonovyy Khrebet Mountains and further northern areas. The Huang Di’s offspring, who lived in these areas, were nomadic people and did not develop agriculture during the Neolithic Age.

(3) Third, to the Tianshan Mountains, Altay Shan Mountains, further north and northeast to the Mongolian Plateau, then to the east to the Da Xing’an Ling Mountains, Northeast Plain and Changbai Mountains, until they reached the Bohai Sea, Sea of Japan and the Korean Peninsula, which was named Liu Bo Mountains in Shanhaijing.

The Huang Di’s offspring lived a nomadic lifestyle in the northwestern areas and did not develop agriculture during the early Neolithic Age. The microlithic sites, discovered in Qideharen of Habahe County in the northwestern Altay Shan Mountains, reveal that the Huang Di People had lived a nomadic lifestyle in this area from at least 12,000BCE to 2,000BCE and then began to develop some agriculture. The Duoerte Rock Paintings in Habahe County prove that the Huang Di People had lived in this area from 14,000 years BP.

Shanhaijing tells that Yu Hao, Dan Er (surnamed Ren), Wu Gu and Ji Wu Min (surnamed Ren) lived in the northern Tibetan Plateau and west of the Qinghai Lake, but their offspring moved to the Northeast Sea (today’s Sea of Japan and Bohai Sea), in where they worshipped sea-god Yu Qiang (Yu Hao). Yu Hu and Yu Jing were their offspring.

Also the Ying Long moved to Mount Xiong Li Tu Qiu in the north of the eastern mountains, highly possible near today’s Liaohe Plain, in where the Ying Long was worshipped as a kind of dragon.

Clearly a few groups of the Huang Di’s offspring moved to the Da Xing’an Ling Mountains, Changbai Mountains and Northeast China Plain (including Liaohe Plain), in where they learned from the Shao Hao’s offspring and turned from nomadic to agricultural lifestyles.

Archaeologists discover that Xiaohexi (7500-6200BCE), Xinglongwa (6200-5200BCE) and Zhaobaogou (5200-4500BCE) cultures in the Liaohe Plain, and Hongshan Culture (4000-3000BCE), which have been found in an area stretching from the Liaohe Plain to Inner Mongolia, had built farming civilizations of mainly cultivated millet and had reared livestock. These cultures match inhabitation areas of the Shao Hao’s offspring and a few groups of the Huang Di’s offspring, such as Yu Hu, Yu Jing and the Ying Long’s offspring. However, the Shao Hao’s offspring, who spread out from the Shandong Peninsula along coastline to the north, arrived the Liaohe Plain earlier than the Huang Di’s offspring, who were in a very small percentage. Therefore, the Shao Hao People were the leading developers of these cultures.

 

13456996675?profile=RESIZE_710x 

The Shao Hao People

The Shao Hao People spread out from Mount Changliu in the western Pamirs Plateau to the west of the Qinghai Lake. The remaining Shao Hao People in Mount Changliu were called “Chang Liu People,” who worshipped Shao Hao as the White King or White Ancestor-god.

Shanhaijing records many wars between different groups of people but no wars between the Shao Hao and other peoples in their early time; instead, the early Zhuan Xu People learning eagerly from the Shao Hao and having no time for their musical instruments, reveals the Shao Hao had mastered most advanced sciences and technologies, all other groups of ancient Chinese people would like to build close friendship with them. Thereby the Shao Hao had greatly influenced other groups of ancient Chinese people with their advanced technologies since their early time.

(1) The Shao Hao and Di Jun People spread out to the Weihe River Valley and the lower reach of the Yellow River during 16,000-14,000 years BP.  The Di Jun lived in the west of today’s Shandong Peninsula.

Around 11,000 years BP, Neolithic Chinese people went from gathering to cultivating millet. Shanhaijing records that the Hou Ji and Shu Jun were the earliest people who experimented with cultivated grains. While archaeological discoveries reveal that the Shao Hao People in the Shandong Peninsula mastered most advanced sciences and technologies during the Neolithic Age. Therefore, the Shao Hao and Di Jun People were the earliest people who develop agriculture.

The god of Mount Hua was Shao Hao, the White Ancestor-God, suggesting the people lived near Mount Hua were offspring of the Shao Hao People.

Mount Hua in Huayin City of Shaanxi Province was the center of Yangshao Culture (5000-3000BCE), which existed in the middle reach of the Yellow River. It reached east to eastern Henan Province, west to Gansu and Qinghai provinces, north to the Hetao area, the Great Band of Yellow River and the Great Wall near Inner Mongolia, and south to the Jianghan Plain.

Laoguantai Culture (6000-5000BCE) was only 30 kilometers west to Mount Hua, and was almost certainly the inhabitation area of the Shao Hao People.

Therefore, the Shao Hao were the leading founders of Di Qiang Culture, including Laoguantai Culture, Qin’an Dadiwan First Culture (6200-3000BCE) in Qinan County of Gansu and their successor, Yangshao Culture, centered in Mount Hua. However, these areas also lived the Di Jun’s offspring, therefore, the Di Jun People were also contributors of these cultures.

Cishan-Peiligang Culture (about 6200-4600BCE) were located on the moving route of the Shao Hao near the Shandong Peninsula. Both of the Di Jun’s and Shao Hao’s offspring were able to reach these areas, but the Shao Hao were leading founders of Cishan-Peiligang Culture.

(2) The Shao Hao and Di Jun People spread out to the Altun Mountains, Qilian Mountains, Helan Mountains, the middle reach of the Yellow River, Yinshan Mountains and today’s Huabei Plain during 16,000-14,000 years BP.

(3) The Shao Hao’s offspring spread out along the Yellow River to today’s Shandong Peninsula during about 16,000-14,000 years BP, living a nomadic lifestyle, collecting millet and hunting animals. The Shao Hao’s migration route from the Pamirs Plateau to today’s Shandong Peninsula was exactly the later Old Silk Road, which was built during the Han Dynasty (202BCE-220CE).

The Shao Hao People were leading founders of Zhaojiaxuyao in Linzi of Zibo (about 13,200 years BP) and Bianbian cave in Beitaohuaping Village of Yiyuan County, Zibo (about 11,000-9,600 years BP), Houli Culture (6400-5700BCE), a millet-growing culture in Linzi, Baishi Coastal Culture (before 7,000 years BP) in the Jiaodong Peninsula, Beixin Culture (5300-4100BCE), Dawenkou (4100-2600BCE) and Longshan (3200-1900BCE) cultures in the Shandong Peninsula. 

The technologies of making black potteries were developed only in the Shandong Peninsula and later spread out to other places of China. The potteries discovered in Houli Culture are main painted-potteries, but also have some black potteries, which used more advanced technologies. Houli, Beixin and Dawenkou cultures and their successor Longshan Culture were named “Dong Yi Culture” by modern archaeologists and historians, who also agree that Dong Yi Culture was the most advanced culture in Neolithic China.

(4)  Along coastline, the Shao Hao’s offspring spread out from today’s Shandong Peninsula and the eastern seashore to the north to today’s Liaohe Plain, Liaodong Peninsula, Korea Peninsula, Japanese archipelago, Kamchatka Peninsula, Aleutian Islands and Americas since 16,000-14,000 years BP.

The Shao Hao’s offspring were leading founders of Zhuan’nian site (10,000-9,200 years BP) of Huairou County, Beijing; Nazhuantou (10,500-9,700 years BP) of Xushui in Henan; Yujiagou (lower layer) site (14,000-8,000 years BP) of Yangyuan County of Hebei;  Baoding (10,000 years BP) of Hebei; Ji County (before 10,000 years BP) of Tianjin. However, the Di Jun’s offspring could also reach these areas and lived in the west of the Shao Hao’s territories, which were near sea.

The Shao Hao’s offspring were leading founders of millet-growing cultures in the Liaohe Plain in the southeast of the Da Xing’an Ling Mountains, such as, Xiaohexi (7500-6200BCE), Xinglongwa (6200-5200BCE) and Zhaobaogou (5200-4500BCE) cultures in the Liaohe Plain, and Hongshan Culture (4000-3000BCE), which have been found in an area stretching from the Liaohe Plain to Inner Mongolia. However, a very small percentage of the Huang Di’s offspring also lived in the Liaohe Plain. 

(5)  Along coastline, the Shao Hao’s offspring spread out from today’s Shandong Peninsula and the eastern seashore to the south to the Changjiang River estuary, southeastern China, including Taiwan, southeastern and southern Asia, Malaysia, Philippines, Indonesia, Polynesia and Australia.

The Shao Hao’s offspring were leading founders of rice-growing cultures in the lower reach of the Changjiang River, including Kuahuqiao (about 6000-5000BCE) in Xiaoshan of Zhejiang, Hemudu (5000-3300BCE) in Yuyao of Zhejiang, Majiabang (5000-4000BCE) in Jiaxing of Zhejiang and their successors, Songze (3800-2900BCE) in Qingpu District of Shanghai, and Liangzhu (3300-2300BCE) near Taihu of Zhejiang. However, a very small percentage of the Di Jun’s offspring, who lived in the west of the Shao Hao’s territories, were also able to reach these areas.

 The Jade Statues in Lingjiatan Culture (3500-3300BCE) in Hanshan County of Anhui Province have big eyes with double eyelids, obvious non-Mongoloid characteristics, suggesting the Shao Hao’s offspring were leading founders of this culture.

13456995466?profile=RESIZE_710x

13456995876?profile=RESIZE_710x

 

The Shao Hao’s offspring were leading founders of Dabenkeng (4000-3000BCE) Culture. Archaeologists confirm that rope figure potteries found in Dabenkeng were similar with Hemudu, Majiabang and Liangzhu cultures. German archaeologist Robert Heine Geldern thought that Dabenkeng Culture also spread from southeastern China and Taiwan to Philippines and Polynesia.

The Shao Hao’s offspring were leading founders of Baozitou (10,000 years BP) of Nanning in Guangxi; Yingde of Guangdong (about 11000-8000BCE), but a very small percentage of the Zhuan Xu’s offspring also had the ability to reach Baozitou.

Archaeological discoveries match the Shao Hao’s inhabitation areas recorded in Shanhaijing, which also reveals that sea level rising forced the Shao Hao’s offspring to move. The Classic of the Great Wilderness: South records the Bei People (the Shao Hao’s offspring) fought with the Di Jun’s offspring for territory, lost the fight and moved to the Mei Yuan Lake. This story tells us that the Shao Hao’s offspring, who had moved to the south of the Changjiang River, moved to inland regions when sea level rising, entered territories of the Di Jun People and caused conflicts.

 

The Di Jun People

The Di Jun People spread out from the Pamirs Plateau to the east of the Taklamakan Desert and west of the Qinghai Lake.

(1) The Shao Hao and Di Jun People spread out to the Altun Mountains, Qilian Mountains, Helan Mountains, the middle reach of the Yellow River, Yinshan Mountains and today’s Huabei Plain during 16,000-14,000 years BP. They were able to reach Zhuan’nian site (10,000-9,200 years BP) in Huairou County of Beijing, Nanzhuangtou site (10,500-9,700 years BP) in Xushui County, Baoding of Hebei, Yujiagou (lower layer) site (14,000-8,000 years BP) in Yangyuan County of Hebei.

 (2)  Following the Shao Hao People, the Di Jun People spread out to the Weihe River Valley and then to the lower reach of the Yellow River during 16,000-14,000 years BP, living a nomadic lifestyle, collecting millet and hunting animals, in the west of the Shao Hao’s inhabitation areas (today’s Shandong Peninsula and its eastern area). 

The Shao Hao People took the leading position, while the Di Jun People took the secondary position, in developing Di Qiang Culture, including Laoguantai, Qin’an Dadiwan First, Cishan-peiligang and their successor, Yangshao Culture.

(3) The Di Jun’s offspring spread out from the Yellow River to the Changjiang River, then to the south of the Changjiang River before 14,000 years BP.

The Shao Hao’s offspring lived near sea in the lower reach of the Changjiang River and were founders of rice-growing cultures, Kuahuqiao, Hemudu, Majiabang, Songze and Liangzhu. But a very small percentage of the Di Jun’s offspring also had the ability to reach there and lived in the west of the Shao Hao’s territories.

Archaeologists have identified remains of several skeletons in Hemudu (5000-3300BCE) sites have high and wide cheekbones, shovel-shaped incisor, flat nasal bone, concave nasal bridge and low orbit, bearing clearly Mongoloid racial characteristics, suggesting they were offspring of the Di Jun’s offspring. Also the Jade Statues in Lingjiatan Culture (3500-3300BCE) in Hanshan County of Anhui Province have big eyes with double eyelids, obvious non-Mongoloid characteristics, suggesting they were the Shao Hao’s offspring.

 (4) The middle reach of the Changjiang River Valley Cultural System, a rice-growing system, includes: Pengtoushan (8200-7800BCE) in Li County of Hunan, Qujialing (2550-2195BCE) in Jingshan of Hubei and Daxi (4400-3300BCE) in Chongqing in the southwest of Sichuan Basin. Pengtoushan and Qujialing matched inhabitation areas of the Di Jun’s offspring, while both the Di Jun and Zhuan Xu People had the ability to reach Daxi and the Di Jun lived in the east of the Zhuan Xu’s territories, which were near the Tibetan Plateau.

The potteries found in Pengtoushan were only painted potteries, a little resemblance with the early Di Qiang Culture, suggesting the Changjiang River Valley cultures were influenced by the Yellow River Valley cultures. The potteries in Daxi Culture were mostly painted potteries but also many black potteries and in Qujialing Culture were main black potteries, suggesting that Yangshao Di Qiang Culture (5000-3000BCE) had deeply influenced Daxi Culture and Longshan Dong Yi Culture (3200-1900BCE) had deeply influenced Qujialing Culture.

(5) The archaeological sites in Wannian County of Jiangxi (about 10,000 years BP) and Dao County of Hunan (about 12,000BCE), which have discovered cultivated rice, were inhabitation areas of the Di Jun’s offspring.

 

The Zhuan Xu People

The Zhuan Xu People spread out from Mount Buzhou in the Pamirs Plateau to the east of the Taklamakan Desert and west of the Qinghai Lake during around 16,000-15,000 years BP.

Shanhaijing records many wars between different groups of the Zhuan Xu People, such as the Xing Tian fought with the Zhuan Xu for the status of their Ancestor-god in the west of the Tibetan Plateau, recorded in The Classic of Regions Beyond the Seas: West, suggesting the Zhuan Xu had different factions. The famous legend of Gong Gong fighting with the Zhuan Xu for leadership but losing, bumping his head against Mount Buzhou in anger, was also due to the faction conflict.

Shanhaijing also records many wars between the Zhuan Xu and Huang Di People and those wars ended with the Zhuan Xu’s defeat, such as the Ying Long killed the Chi You with help from the Ba and later killed the Kua Fu. The Ying Long and Ba were the Huang Di’s offspring while the Chi You and Kua Fu were the Zhuan Xu’s offspring.

Shanhaijing has no record of the Zhuan Xu having war with the Shao Hao, instead, The Classic of the Great Wilderness: East records that the Shao Hao People nurtured the more immature Zhuan Xu People and the Zhuan Xu discarded their musical instruments - Qin and Se, suggesting the Zhuan Xu had built close friendship with the Shao Hao since their early time and learned eagerly most advanced technologies from the Shao Hao.

(1) The Classic of the Great Wilderness: North says Zhuan Xu and nine wives were buried in Mount Fuyu, which was located between the Yellow River beyond the northwest sea (Qinghai Lake). The Mount Fuyu is located in today’s Aemye Ma-chhen Range, which is located inside the U-shaped turn of the Yellow River. 

The remains of human activity about 11,200-10,000 years BP in Xiadawu of Maqin County, Golog Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture of Qinghai Province, near the Aemye Ma-chhen Range, were inhabitation areas of the Zhuan Xi’s offspring.

The Aemye Ma-chhen Range is very near to the Weihe River Valley. Some of the Zhuan Xu People possibly followed the Shao Hao and Di Jun People to enter the Weihe River Valley. However, Shanhaijing records many wars between the Zhuan Xu and Di Jun People since their early time and those wars ended with the Zhuan Xu’s defeat. For an example, the Yu People fought with the Gong Gong near Mount Buzhou. Due to the overwhelming majority of the Di Jun People moving to the eastern China, they did not allow the Zhuan Xu People to enter the Weihe Plain and move to the east to grab territories from them. This matches Shanhaijing having no records of the Zhuan Xu People living in the eastern China.

(2) The famous Dzopa stone discs, which were made about 12,000 years BP and discovered in 1938 in the Bayankala Mountains, were the evidence of the Zhuan Xu’s offspring lived near the Tibetan Plateau about 13,000-12,000 years BP, when scientists believed that temperature there was fit for human habitation.

However, about 11,000 years BP, the Younger Dryas Event happened, the temperature in the Tibetan Plateau dropped nearly three degrees, meanwhile, the rapid uprising of the Tibetan Plateau began since 10,000 years BP. During this period, there were many earthquakes. The famous legend of Gong Gong fighting with the Zhuan Xu for the leadership and bumping his head against Mount Buzhou, was one of the earthquakes. The Zhuan Xu People in the Tibetan Plateau almost perished due to the great changes of environment; most of them had to move to other places, only a few groups of people were able to survive disasters. The Classic of the Great Wilderness: West says that the San Mian People, who had three faces and one arm, lived in the northern Tibetan Plateau and did not die. They survived during environment changes.

(3) Shanhaijing has many records of the Zhuan Xu People living near the Tibetan Plateau and later moving to the south. The Zhu Rong People moved from the west to the east of the Chishui River and lived in the far south of the Di Mountain, recorded in The Classic of Regions Beyond the Sea: South, hinting us that the Zhuan Xu’s offspring moved to the south along the east of the Tibetan Plateau.

The Huan Tou People, who were offspring of Gun (Zhuan Xu’s offspring) and used to live in the west of the Qinghai Lake, moved to the south of the Tibetan Plateau due to great environment changes and settled near sea, highly possible today’s Dhaka of Bangladesh. From that area, the Huan Tou People had the ability to spread out to today’s India, South Asia, Malaysia, Indonesia, Polynesia and Australia.

(4) A famous record in The Classic of the Great Wilderness: West goes, the Yu Fu People (the Zhuan Xu’s offspring), who lived in the west and north of the Taklamakan Desert, were nearly erased due to great natural disasters. They moved to the south of the Taklamakan Desert. “The Zhuan Xu People recovering from death” hints us that the Yu Fu moved to the Aemye Ma-chhen Range, where the Zhuan Xu used to live and were buried, and claimed they were the Zhuan Xu People. They changed their totem from a snake (or animal) to a fish.

Some legends said that ancestors of Sanxingdui came from the north along the rivers. The Yu Fu People moved from the Aemye Ma-chhen Range, which is exactly in the north of Sichuan Basin, to the south and entered Sichuan Basin. Archaeologists believe that the Yu Fu mentioned in Shanhaijing left remains at the archaeological site of Sanxingdui in Guanghan City in the northwestern Sichuan Basin. Archaeologists have discovered remains of human activity in Sanxingdui about 12,000 years BP. The Yu Fu People in Shanhaijing were the ancestors of the Yu Fu Culture whose remains were found in Sanxingdui.

The cultural relics of Jinsha Culture (about 1250-650BCE), 50 kilometers to Sanxingdui, share similarities with Sanxingdui, but some of Jinsha’s relics share similarities with Liangzhu Culture (3300-2300BCE) in the lower reach of the Changjiang River. Historians believe that the Jinsha People came from Sanxingdui, but had influenced by the Changjiang River Valley cultures.  

13456996076?profile=RESIZE_400x

(5) According to Mao County Yingpanshan Neolithic Site, publishing by Heritage Publishing House, the painted potteries in Yingpanshan Culture (5,300-4,600 years BP) (in Mao County of Sichuan) and Majiayao Culture (3300-2050BCE) (in an area of the upper reach of the Yellow River, Gansu and Qinghai) and the later stage of Yangshao Culture (5000-3000BCE) (centered in Mount Hua), have similarities and have same chemical compositions; also both of Yingpanshan and Majiayao-Yangshao were millet-growing cultures; however, Yingpanshan Culture has its unique grass-pattern potteries, which were not found in Majiayao and Yangshao cultures, suggesting the Yingpanshan people learned from the Majiayao and Yangshao people to make those painted potteries, and even the materials came from there. Majiayao site in Lintong of Gansu was 400 kilometers in the north of Yingpanshan in Mao County of Sichuan. Archaeological discoveries coincide with Shanhaijing’s record of the Zhuan Xu People learning eargly from the Shao Hao People, (who were leading founders of Di Qiang Culture).

Archaeologists discover that the Yingpanshan People came from the north and moved south 80 kilometers to Guiyuanqiao (in Shifang County of Sichuan), then moved south 50 kilometers to Baodun, and built the earliest city of Sichuan Basin - Baodun city. Baodun Culture (4,500-3,800 years BP), which is the earliest archaeology culture in Sichuan Basin, had the root in Yingpanshan Culture, but was also deeply influenced by Shijiahe Culture (about 6,000-4,500 years BP) in the middle reach of the Changjiang River, including the rice-cultivating culture, city wall construction techniques, potteries and stone tools.

Yingpanshan, Guiyuanqiao and Baodun cultures were migrating cultures. The moving route of the Yingpanshan People to Guiyuanqiao to Baodun, was also the moving route of the earliest Zhuan Xu People, along the east of the Tibetan Plateau, from the north to the south and reach Sichun Basin.

(6) The Zhuan Xu People, who moved to Sichuan Basin from the north, and the Di Jun People, who moved upstream from the middle reach of the Changjiang River, all had ability to reach Daxi Culture (4400-3300BCE) in Wushan County of Chongqing.

(7) The Qinglong Site of Guizhou and Dalongtan Culture (about 4500BCE), situated at Long’an County of Guangxi Province, were on the moving routes of the Zhuang Xu’s offspring, who moved from the north of the Tibetan Plateau to the south, until reached sea during about 16,000-14,000 years BP. But the Yu fu People were not ancestors of the Dalongtan People.

The Zhuan Xu’s offspring also had ability to reach Baozitou in Naba Village of Guangxi and Yingde of Guangdong, where were inhabitation areas of the Shao Hao’s offspring.

 

Cultures

Founders

Here, Shao Hao refers to Shao Hao’s offspring, so do Di Jun, Zhuan Xu and Huang Di.

Yellow River

Di Qiang Culture

Laoguantai (6000-5000BCE)

Qin’an Dadiwan First (6200-3000BCE)

Cishan-Peiligang (6200-4600BCE)

Yangshao (5000-3000BCE)

Majiayao (3000-2000BCE)

Shao Hao & Di Jun

(The Shao Hao were leading founders.)

Yellow River

Dong Yi Culture

Houli (6400-5700BCE)

Beixin (5300-4100BCE)

Dawenkou (4100-2600BCE)

Longshan (3200-1900BCE)

Shao Hao

Changjiang River Culture

Majiabang (5000-4000BCE)

Hemudu (5000-3300BCE)

Liangzhu (3300-2300BCE)

Songze (3800-2900BCE)

Shao Hao

 

Pengtoushan (8200-7800BCE)

Daxi (4400-3300BCE)

Qujialing (2550-2195BCE)

Di Jun,

but influenced by Shao Hao

Southeast Coast

Dabenkeng (4000-3000BCE)

Shao Hao

Zhujiang River

Dalongtan (4500BCE)

Zhuan Xu

Chengdu of Sichuan

Sanxingdui (12000-3000BCE)

Zhuan Xu (but deeply influenced by Shao Hao)

Da Xing’an Ling

Xiaohexi (7500-6200BCE)

Xinglongwa (6200-5200BCE)

Zhaobaogou (5200-4500BCE)

Hongshan (4000-3000BCE)

Shao Hao & a very small percentage of Huang Di (The Shao Hao were leading founders.)

 

 

Conclusion

Due to the long-time of the matriarchal clan society, it was difficult to ascertain an individual’s patriarchal clan. However, almost all groups of ancient Chinese People accepted only endogamy within same race during the Neolithic Age, enabling Shanhaijing to identify about 150 groups of people, who came from the five biggest groups of people and had played important roles in making ancient Chinese civilization. The five most famous groups were the Yan Di, Huang Di, Zhuan Xu, Di Jun and Shao Hao. They first lived in the Pamirs Plateau, soon gathered in the area in the west of the Qinghai Lake and north of the Tibetan Plateau, then moved to other places of China during about 16,000-14,000 years BP.

The Yan Di’s offspring spread out to the west of the Taklamakan Desert; The Huang Di’s offspring spread out to the north of the Chishui River, Tianshan Mountains and further northern and northeastern areas; The Di Jun’s and Shao Hao’s offspring spread out to the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River, where the Di Jun’s offspring lived in the west of the Shao Hao’s territories, which were near sea or in the Shandong Peninsula. Modern archaeological discoveries have revealed the authenticity of Shanhaijing’s records. 

 

References

(1) Liu Xiang (79BCE-8BCE)and Liu Xin (53BCE-23BCE, son of Liu Xiang) were first editors of Shanhaijing (before 4200BCE-256BCE).

(2) Guo Pu(276-324CE), author of Burial Book, was a geomantic scholar from the Jin Dynasty (also known as Sima Jin, 265-420CE),

[3] Li Xiao-ding, Collected Explanations of Shell and Bone Characters, Jiagu wenzi zhishi, 1965, 8 Volumes, The Institute of History and Philology.

[4] Liu Feng-Jun, Changle Bone Inscriptions, December 2008, Shandong Pictorial Publishing House

[5] Vivien Gornitz, Sea Level Rise, After the Ice Melted and Today, Jan 2007, NASA,

http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/gornitz_09/  accessed June 2, 2024

 

Other Scholarly Papers Presented and Published by Soleilmavis.

https://peacepink.ning.com/blog/scholarly-papers-presented-and-published-by-soleilmavis

Read more…

After ICC prosecutor, UN Human Rights Office/UN contacted me with one special tool recently... I know I am not alone.
Please send it immediately for yourselves. It is time for "final account ".

 

If you all, listed at the bottom, are together, you must and can stop what they are still doing in Ontario, Canada although you all have stood up and have spoken out for me, not only for me for over 20 years.


After ICC prosecutor, UN Human Rights Office/UN contacted me with one special tool recently regarding holding those criminals against humanity in Canada accountable and abiding by all UNs' resolutions for victims of torture,

ICC and UN Human Rights Office/UN

https://ibb.co/HLnSq017

Or,

https://tempsend.com/eyfsm


Canada' s No.1 internet and mobile provider, Rogers' Fido has totally hacked my phone. They at once shut down my mobile internet when I type some sensitive words or use some VPNs, or.... Their computer guys are tracing me everywhere I use public WiFi.

Meanwhile, they are committing madly terror, psychological torture, and MK Ultra (reported by all Canadian media several years ago) when I am home and when in my workplace. They are controlling and attacking my hearing, my heart, my head, my body with Microwave Weapons, EMF Hearing Jammers, "Electronic Nervous Virus" , by one whistle blower ( chips + / repeated poison by McDonald's CashierS in Ontario, Canada, actually is also called "sensitizer " from one professor of California University . ) and with all possible Non-Lethal Weapons, Weapons of Mass Destruction defined by UNs several times and long time ago.

https://ibb.co/ngL1B6V

( United States Army Intelligence....
From this unit, you can realize how serious my situation in Ontario, Canada is and who those torturers are. )

With Microwave Weapons which "Canada" has invited , besides for attacking our hearts , what else can they do? Attacking our hearing to cause tinnitus and to damage our brain because our ear and our brain are connected, from experts.


Microwave Weapons which "Canada" has invited for attacking heart

( The combined photo, right side one, tells you how they cover up their serious crimes with "blurring "technology when selecting and uploading the photos, which was confirmed by one foreign government. )

https://tempsend.com/nxtre

And,

https://tempsend.com/eetpt

Or,

https://ibb.co/VWK8P4KW


EMF Hearing Jammers

(They hack madly this photo when uploading it.)

https://tempsend.com/fpewk

Or,

https://ibb.co/sJtwT9Y6

Or,

https://fastupload.io/176cc438a42ea896

Or,

https://easyupload.io/dvee00


Confirmed by experts

https://tempsend.com/wfrad

Or,

https://ibb.co/GvGBrqws

Or,

https://fastupload.io/15229e2a2a5cf8c4

Or,

https://ufile.io/0csyodn9


Meanwhile, I can sleep now due to the use of Non-Lethal Weapons by all my neighbors,
at least 5 Philippine couples, who don't work for over 21 years. Actually, I have hardly had one good and whole sleep for over 21 years after I contacted UN, Amnesty International... UN, Amnesty International, plus IRCT, were the first ones to stand up for me. WHO and OMCT point out that bad sleep for a long time must lead to serious problems.

https://ibb.co/ngL1B6V


Meanwhile, they are 404ing, 403ing, filtering and firewalling all UN's websites, plus IBA's. Their dirty hands are on my house, my room, my cars, and on any tools I am using with IP, MAC, and Bluetooth.

If they don't commit such serious crimes in Ontario, Canada, why are they doing these regardless of anything?


More evil than you imagine:

12 years ago, they forcibly injected me to chip me by wearing " invisibility cloaks
" and poisoning me in my apartment room. UN Human Rights Office and UN Human Rights Council have known that. This is why their drones, aircrafts, and "special vehicles " are tracing and following me anywhere and everywhere in Ontario, Canada.


https://ibb.co/QHmDC4r (  invisibility cloaks )

Why chip / medical implant from UN:

https://ibb.co/Rpt7t65

Or,

https://tempsend.com/qnycx


More, more than you think ...are here:

Psychological torture

Forty-third session
24 February - 20 March 2020
Agenda item 3

Mind weapons, MK Ultra, weapons of mass destruction by UN Human Rights Office and UN :


https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Torture/Call/Individuals/ElectromagneticTorture.pdf

https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Torture/Call/Individuals/ElectromagneticTorture.pdf

Having this video below, I am not afraid of anything. It is time for
"Final Account" .


https://youtu.be/KgkG6N9tx3A


Fight  for my life being  threatened ; fight against ongoing terror, psychological torture ( which UN and UN Human Rights deeply began to worry about 2 years ago) , MK Ultra ( which was reported by all Canadian media several years ago ) , poison ( how and why "Canada..." repeatedly poison me, UN Human Rights Office has them. One witness shout :don't drink it. ), death threats and attempted murder by every possible means and with all possible Non-Lethal Weapons, especially EMF. I am not alone and I need your help.

https://ibb.co/ngL1B6V

 

Robin Yan

Canadian victim of torture

14/02/2025

justin.trudeau@parl.gc.ca
sgcentral@un.org
sr-torture@ohchr.org
sssgeneva@un.org
controlcenter.security-unog@un.org
information@icj-cij.org
Fadi.El-Abdallah@icc-cpi.int
petitions@ohchr.org
iba@int-bar.org
CP@ohchr.org
dpa-scsb3@un.org
hrc-sr-torture@un.org
otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int
urgent-action@ohchr.org
ohchr-petitions@un.org
iba@int-bar.org
ohchr-reprisals@un.org
unvfvt@ohchr.org
ohchr-infoDesk@un.org
birnbackn@un.org
hector.calderon@un.org
coutrix@un.org
apply@unpeacekeepingforces.org
leave@unpeacekeepingforces.org
unog.ngo@un.org
ccpr@ohchr.org
cat@ohchr.org
support@peacekeeping-un.com

 

 

 

Read more…

I have one worthy idea. If they are together, if they work together, " Canada...." will immediately abide by all UNs resolutions.
All my neighbors, at least 5 Philippine couples...they have nowhere to hide, and nowhere to run. Please send to them, UN PEACEKEEPIUN....

 

This urgent message to UN Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or
punishment /UN Human Rights Chief /UN Human Rights Council, UN Peacekeeping , International Criminal Court , and UN Secretary-General. If you all are together, you can stop them in Ontario, Canada; "Canada... " will immediately abide by all UNs Resolutions regarding torture, psychological torture, and crimes against humanity.

More evil and more brutal than you can imagine :

Their drones, special drones are tracing me every where in Ontario, Canada.UN Human Rights Office and UN Human Rights Council have the photos and videos. By them and with them, they must commit crimes against humanity according to NATO's evidence that lower satellite can emit EMF and RF...onto targets.

Over 20 years, I have hardly had one good and whole sleep due to the use of Non-Lethal Weapons, EMF Hearing Jammers ( confirmed by hearing experts and by EMF literatures I have provided to you all.) , "Electronic Nervous Virus" ( whistle blowers of several years ago), and Sound Cannons by all my neighbors, at least 5 Philippine couples, who don't work at all over 20 years. Can you imagine that in Ontario, Canada at least 5 Philippine couples were and are my neighbors? Regarding Sound Cannons, all Canadian media reported them long time ago.

https://ibb.co/ngL1B6V

In my workplace, in my home...they are committing madly torture, psychological torture, and crimes against humanity. They are controlling my hearing, my heart, my body.

....


UN Special Rapporteur/ UN Human Rights Chief/UN Human Rights Council , please order "Canada " to do at once what UN , UN Human Rights , and International Criminal Court have asked about torture, psychological torture, and crimes against humanity.

UN Peacekeeping, please take every possible actions to stop what are still happening in Ontario, Canada no matter
what you all did and your "advices" to "Canada".

International Criminal Court, please order "Canada " to hand over those Canadian criminals against humanity, all my neighbor s, at least 5 Philippine couples, who don't work at all over 20 years. And, PM and Canadian government refused to take any actions to stop them although they all have known their IDs, and although they have known what they are committing with those inhuman weapons.

UN Secretary-General, the former UN Secretary-General in Canada stated: " Human Rights must be protected."

New UN Human Rights Chief said so:

"Canada a beacon for others but must keep it promises..."


Recently, both International Criminal Court and UN Human Rights Office contacted me with some special tools. However, now they are hacking, filtering, firewalling,
everything, VPNs, APPs, such as Ultra Applock, Proxy Browsers, all browsers and their settings, even deleting my file in notepad from backstage....

UN Human Rights Office and UN Human Rights Council told the whole world that in some countries, there are 2 % of people who are suffering this,

https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Torture/Call/Individuals/ElectromagneticTorture.pdf


www.peacepink.ning.com is the "last stop" for me on which I can post, I can disclose about how evil, brutal they are because all free social medias are now blocking me after a period of time.

You all received my files, evidence about their serious crimes in Ontario, Canada.
www.peacepink.ning.com can be used as optional ,but necessary tool for considering your possible actions.

 


peacepink.ning 1

https://ufile.io/p94z8gky

peacepink.ning 2

https://ufile.io/nprxpaj5

Or,

https://tempsend.com/dkeqe


peacepink.ning 1

https://ibb.co/QXrqDsT

peacepink.ning 2

https://ibb.co/YDf3614

 

No matter how evil and brutal they all are, having this video below, I am not afriad of anything. It is time for "Final Account" !

https://youtu.be/KgkG6N9tx3A


Fight  for my life being  threatened ; fight against ongoing terror, psychological torture ( which UN and UN Human Rights deeply began to worry about 2 years ago) , MK Ultra ( which was reported by all Canadian media several years ago ) , poison ( how and why "Canada..." repeatedly poison me, UN Human Rights Office has them. One female witness shout :Don't drink it, that coffee. ), death threats and attempted murder by every possible means and with all possible Non-Lethal Weapons, especially EMF. I am not alone and I need your help.

https://ibb.co/ngL1B6V

 

Robin Yan

Canadian victim of torture

28/01/2025

justin.trudeau@parl.gc.ca
sgcentral@un.org
sr-torture@ohchr.org
sssgeneva@un.org
controlcenter.security-unog@un.org
information@icj-cij.org
Fadi.El-Abdallah@icc-cpi.int
petitions@ohchr.org
iba@int-bar.org
CP@ohchr.org
dpa-scsb3@un.org
hrc-sr-torture@un.org
otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int
urgent-action@ohchr.org
ohchr-petitions@un.org
iba@int-bar.org
ohchr-reprisals@un.org
unvfvt@ohchr.org
ohchr-infoDesk@un.org
birnbackn@un.org
hector.calderon@un.org
coutrix@un.org
apply@unpeacekeepingforces.org
leave@unpeacekeepingforces.org

 

Read more…

After seeing what they in Ontario, Canada are doing, you must at once send them below to them because they extremely don't like them, UN PEACEKEEPING, UN Human Rights Office/Chief, UN Human Rights Council, plus UN Secretary-Generals...not only for myself.

 

UN Human Rights told me " Human Rights can't not be comprised."

" If they shut up your mouth, all allegations are real."

After searching key words "Electronic Nervous Virus" one time, now they are 100% filtering them. I can't find anything about how they work and why they use them.


To cover up their serious crimes, war crimes , crimes against humanity defined by ICC after contacting ICC , Canada's No.1 Internet provider, Rogers' Fido , from back stage is keeping deleting my saved file " After seeing what NATO , UN , UN Human Rights Office/Chiefs, UN Human Rights Council discloused..." It was saved onto my notepad. Before Rogers' Fido hided my saved PDF files by changing its "path" from back stage so that I can't find and upload those files.

After seeing what NATO , UN , UN Human
Rights Office/Chiefs, UN Human Rights
Council discloused for all of us , you all ,
listed at the bottom of this request, must
take all possible actions for what are still
happening in Ontario, Canada .Please send,
not only for myself.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Now, their computer expert is tracing me
"everywhere" I use public WiFi.

Firstly, please see what crimes they in
Ontario, Canada commit and how they
covered up their seious crimes with one
special technology disclosed by one foreign government about 10 years ago.
The combined photo below is that
"Canada"...covered up their terror , brutality,
and crimes against humanity when I
uploaded and sent it to All UN's,
International Criminal Court, and
International Bar Association regarding
how Microwaves Weapons affect and
control our hearts. The left side photo is
hacked one when uploading. The right side
is normal one. Both brutality and evil !

https://ibb.co/kBP2CqL

Or,

https://tempsend.com/ynkkd

Then, these 3 key Weapons have being
used when in my home , when in my
workplace, even being used with regular
and special drones. NATO: EMF , RF ...can
be emitted onto targets from aircrafts,
lower satellite. This is why their regular and
special drones, aircrafts are tracing me
everywhere in Canada. UN Human Rights
Office and UN Human Rights Council have
the photos and the video about their drones
and aircrafts. I don't have to provide them
again. Non-Lethal Weapons, EMF Hearing
Jammers ( especially in my workplace ),
"Electronic Nervous Virus" , by one whistle
blower ( chips + / repeated poison by
McDonald's CashierS in Ontario, Canada,
actually is also called "sensitizer " from one
professor of California University . )

After searching key words "Electronic Nervous Virus" one time, now they are 100% filtering them. I can't find how they work and why they use them.

https://ibb.co/ngL1B6V

Non-Lethal Weapons sales with NATO in
Canada

https://ibb.co/THvFCZM

https://tempsend.com/wqgke

"The only purpose of Non-Lethal Weapons
is to incapacitate targets and change their
behaviors." ---NATO

How and when they chipped me in my
home ; How, why and when McDonald's
CashierS repeatedly poisoned me , both
UN Human Rights Office and UN Human
Rights Council have everything.

More evil than you can imagen are 1)
destroyed my 2 cars, destroyed my new
Nikon Camera; my new phone was lost in
my home ....2) 404ing, 403ing, filtering and
firewalling all UN's websites, plus IBA's 3)
over 20 years I have hardly had one good
and whole sleep in my home and I can't
work normally every day in my workplace
due to their ongoing terror and brutality
regardless of the "advices " from 2 UN
Secretary-Generals , UN Human Rights
Council, UN Human Rights Office /Chief
( recently ), International Criminal Court
( recently )....4) Sound Cannon used by my
neighbors. During G20, in Toronto, Ontario,
Canada, they dispersed protestors with it.

Sound Cannon

https://ibb.co/P65pWgz

Or,

https://tempsend.com/vbbzy

Or,

https://ufile.io/wlsfedxi

These are systemic torture, psychological
torture and MK Ultra disclosed by UN
Human Rights Council, UN Human Rights
Office and by all Canadian media several
years ago.

Chip from UN

https://ibb.co/stP0ctF

Or,

https://ufile.io/2ernqn6a

Or,

https://tempsend.com/tzynh

EMF Hearing Jammers from "literature "
and medical experts after experiments

https://ibb.co/wyncRwL

Or,

https://tempsend.com/whzjj

From UN

https://ibb.co/KwnsDd1

Psychological torture
Forty-third session
24 February - 20 March 2020
Agenda item 3

Mind weapons, MK Ultra, weapons of mass
destruction by UN Human Rights Office and
UN :

https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files
/Documents/Issues/Torture/Call
/Individuals/ElectromagneticTorture.pdf

From their bizzre and mad expression and
behaviors ( 404ing, 403ing, filtering and
firewalling all UN's websites, plus IBA's ),
they do commit terror, psychological
torture, and MK Ultra in Canada.

Having this video below, I am not afraid of
anything. It is time for

"Final Account" .
https://youtu.be/KgkG6N9tx3A

Fight for my life being threatened ; fight
against ongoing terror, psychological
torture ( which UN and UN Human Rights
deeply began to worry about 2 years ago) ,
MK Ultra ( which was reported by all
Canadian media several years ago ) ,
poison ( how and why "Canada..."
repeatedly poison me, UN Human Rights
Office has them. One female witness
shout :Don't drink it, that coffee. ), death
threats and attempted murder by every
possible means and with all possible
Non-Lethal Weapons, especially EMF. I am
not alone and I need your help.
https://ibb.co/ngL1B6V

Robin Yan

Canadian victim of torture

18/01/2025


Those attached files for your reference .
Please download ASAP.

Canada's No.1 Internet provider

https://ufile.io/gz76yzdf

Or,

https://tempsend.com/secxj

Or,

https://fastupload.io/8735f59b8ab63faa

Over 20 years, you understand why PM and Canadian government refuse to take actions

https://tempsend.com/pmmbh

Or,

https://fastupload.io/c080021401a01637

https://fastupload.io/c080021401a01637


Or,

https://ufile.io/nj5hy15a


After seeing what NATO, UN Human Rights Office, UN Human Rights Council disclosed...

https://tempsend.com/wddex


Or,

https://fastupload.io/ffa251eb106694a6

Or,

https://ufile.io/0k5sv7ea

Everyrhing is clear for everyone , UN, all torturers in Canada, and me.


https://tempsend.com/vpdyd

Or,

https://fastupload.io/127a71ad0f0e3f49

Or,

https://ufile.io/7a3v5blx

 

justin.trudeau@parl.gc.ca
sgcentral@un.org
vturk@ohchr.org
sssgeneva@un.org
controlcenter.security-unog@un.org
information@icj-cij.org
Fadi.El-Abdallah@icc-cpi.int
petitions@ohchr.org
sr-torture@ohchr.org
iba@int-bar.org
CP@ohchr.org
dpa-scsb3@un.org
hrc-sr-torture@un.org
otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int
urgent-action@ohchr.org
ohchr-petitions@un.org
iba@int-bar.org
ohchr-reprisals@un.org
unvfvt@ohchr.org
ohchr-infoDesk@un.org
birnbackn@un.org
hector.calderon@un.org
coutrix@un.org
apply@unpeacekeepingforces.org
leave@unpeacekeepingforces.org
ohchr-reprisals@un.org
ohchr-infoDesk@un.org
unog.ngo@un.org
ccpr@ohchr.org
cat@ohchr.org
support@peacekeeping-un.com

Read more…

https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2022/09/spyware-and-surveillance-threats-privacy-and-human-rights-growing-un-report

 

Spyware and surveillance: Threats to privacy and human rights growing, UN report warns

16 September 2022

GENEVA (16 September 2022) – People’s right to privacy is coming under ever greater pressure from the use of modern networked digital technologies whose features make them formidable tools for surveillance, control and oppression, a new UN report has warned. This makes it all the more essential that these technologies are reined in by effective regulation based on international human rights law and standards.

The report – the latest on privacy in the digital age by the UN Human Rights Office* – looks at three key areas: the abuse of intrusive hacking tools (“spyware”) by State authorities; the key role of robust encryption methods in protecting human rights online; and the impacts of widespread digital monitoring of public spaces, both offline and online.

The report details how surveillance tools such as the “Pegasus” software can turn most smartphones into “24-hour surveillance devices”, allowing the “intruder” access not only to everything on our mobiles but also weaponizing them to spy on our lives.

“While purportedly being deployed for combating terrorism and crime, such spyware tools have often been used for illegitimate reasons, including to clamp down on critical or dissenting views and on those who express them, including journalists, opposition political figures and human rights defenders,” the report states.

Urgent steps are needed to address the spread of spyware, the report flags, reiterating the call for a moratorium on the use and sale of hacking tools until adequate safeguards to protect human rights are in place. Authorities should only electronically intrude on a personal device as a last resort “to prevent or investigate a specific act amounting to a serious threat to national security or a specific serious crime,” it says.

Encryption is a key enabler of privacy and human rights in the digital space, yet it is being undermined. The report calls on States to avoid taking steps that could weaken encryption, including mandating so-called backdoors that give access to people’s encrypted data or employing systematic screening of people’s devices, known as client-side scanning.

The report also raises the alarm about the growing surveillance of public spaces. Previous practical limitations on the scope of surveillance have been swept away by large-scale automated collection and analysis of data, as well as new digitized identity systems and extensive biometric databases that greatly facilitate the breadth of such surveillance measures.

New technologies have also enabled the systematic monitoring of what people are saying online, including through collecting and analysing social media posts.

Governments often fail to adequately inform the public about their surveillance activities, and even where surveillance tools are initially rolled out for legitimate goals, they can easily be repurposed, often serving ends for which they were not originally intended.

The report emphasises that States should limit public surveillance measures to those “strictly necessary and proportionate”, focused on specific locations and time. The duration of data storage should similarly be limited. There is also an immediate need to restrict the use of biometric recognition systems in public spaces.

All States should also act immediately to put in place robust export control regimes for surveillance technologies that pose serious risks to human rights. They should also ensure human rights impact assessments are carried out that take into account what the technologies in question are capable of, as well as the situation in the recipient country.

“Digital technologies bring enormous benefits to societies. But pervasive surveillance comes at a high cost, undermining rights and choking the development of vibrant, pluralistic democracies,” said Acting High Commissioner for Human Rights Nada Al-Nashif.

“In short, the right to privacy is more at risk than ever before,” she stressed. “This is why action is needed and needed now.”

Read more…

Threats to Disfigure Face

 

 

     Ten years ago (2014) he said he was going to break me and after several months he did break me.  During this time or process of breaking, he and she threatened to disfigure my face.  They were assualting my face with some type of energy about the nose and mouth and they were also theatening to damage my teeth.  The man I named in my complaint to the FBI kept saying, your teeth, your teeth.  You see he had already damaged my penis in 2008.  He said in 2008 that I was going to piss side ways.  I didn't feel anything assualt my penis but one day I was peeing and I looked down and my penis was turned to the side.  He had colapsed the left side of the spongy tissue which makes up the penis.  So now when he says he is going to disfigure my face, that is a real threat to actually make one very fearful.  Now he has damaged several other parts of my body so you must add these other things he has done to me and add this also to the threat factor.  For several months now he has been putting this energy on my face at night and it starts about one and one half hour to two hours after I go to sleep.  I have been sleep deprived now for over twenty years and I am in a severly sleep deprived state and I am exhausted most of the time.  He likes to say he's lazy and he has said it to other people trying to make me look bad in other people's eyes.  He has always used several combinations of torture over the past two decades which is a crime itself.  I am a 76 year old disabled veteran with a 100% rating and so my disability may not appear so visable he wants to make me totally disabled.  The energy he has been assualting my face with causes my sinses, my throat, and my mouth to become very dry.  I have awaken with my tongue stuck to the roof of my mouth.  He has also said he is going to cause the roof of my mouth to collapse.  These are very sick individuals, don't you agree!  To be continued.

 

Read more…

Thanks for everyone.

I was not able to log in peacepink for years, but I have been paying the fees of peacepink, so that it would still survive.

I am so sorry to not able to reply your messages, which had sent to me through peacepink.ning.com.

I greatly thank for all peacepink members, who would continue their great work.

2024 is ending and 2025 is coming.

I wish everyone a Merry Christmas and Happy new Year, and a prosperous 2025!

 

Thank you and Best Regards!

Soleilmavis

 

 

Read more…

After seeing what NATO , UN , UN Human Rights Office/Chiefs, UN Human Rights Council discloused for all of us , you all ,
listed at the bottom of this request, must take all possible actions for what are still happening in Ontario, Canada .Please send, not only for myself.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Now, their computer expert is tracing me "everywhere" I use public WiFi.


Firstly, please see what crimes they in Ontario, Canada commit and how they covered up their seious crimes with one special technology disclosed by one foreign government about 10 years ago.

The combined photo below is that "Canada"...covered up their terror , brutality, and crimes against humanity when I uploaded and sent it to All UN's, International Criminal Court, and International Bar Association regarding how Microwaves Weapons affect and control our hearts. The left side photo is hacked one when uploading. The right side is normal one. Both brutality and evil !

https://ibb.co/kBP2CqL

Or,

https://tempsend.com/ynkkd


Then, these 3 key Weapons have being used when in my home , when in my workplace, even being used with regular and special drones. NATO: EMF , RF ...can be emitted onto targets from aircrafts, lower satellite. This is why their regular and special drones, aircrafts are tracing me everywhere in Canada. UN Human Rights Office and UN Human Rights Council have the photos and the video about their drones and aircrafts. I don't have to provide them again.

Non-Lethal Weapons, EMF Hearing Jammers ( especially in my workplace ),
"Electronic Nervous Virus" , by one whistle blower ( chips + / repeated poison by McDonald's CashierS in Ontario, Canada, actually is also called "sensitizer " from one professor of California University . )

https://ibb.co/ngL1B6V


Non-Lethal Weapons sales with NATO in Canada

https://ibb.co/THvFCZM

https://tempsend.com/wqgke


"The only purpose of Non-Lethal Weapons is to incapacitate targets and change their behaviors." ---NATO

How and when they chipped me in my home ; How, why and when McDonald's CashierS repeatedly poisoned me , both UN Human Rights Office and UN Human Rights Council have everything.

More evil than you can imagen are 1) destroyed my 2 cars, destroyed my new Nikon Camera; my new phone was lost in my home ....2) 404ing, 403ing, filtering and firewalling all UN's websites, plus IBA's 3) over 20 years I have hardly had one good and whole sleep in my home and I can't work normally every day in my workplace due to their ongoing terror and brutality regardless of the "advices " from 2 UN Secretary-Generals , UN Human Rights Council, UN Human Rights Office /Chief ( recently ), International Criminal Court ( recently )....4) Sound Cannon used by my neighbors. During G20, in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, they dispersed protestors with it.

Sound Cannon

https://ibb.co/P65pWgz

Or,

https://tempsend.com/vbbzy

Or,

https://ufile.io/wlsfedxi


These are systemic torture, psychological torture and MK Ultra disclosed by UN Human Rights Council, UN Human Rights Office and by all Canadian media several years ago.


Chip from UN

https://ibb.co/stP0ctF

Or,

https://ufile.io/2ernqn6a

Or,

https://tempsend.com/tzynh


EMF Hearing Jammers from "literature " and medical experts after experiments

https://ibb.co/wyncRwL

Or,

https://tempsend.com/whzjj


From UN

https://ibb.co/KwnsDd1

 

Psychological torture

Forty-third session
24 February - 20 March 2020
Agenda item 3

Mind weapons, MK Ultra, weapons of mass destruction by UN Human Rights Office and UN :


https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Torture/Call/Individuals/ElectromagneticTorture.pdf


From their bizzre and mad expression and behaviors ( 404ing, 403ing, filtering and firewalling all UN's websites, plus IBA's ), they do commit terror, psychological torture, and MK Ultra in Canada.


Having this video below, I am not afraid of anything. It is time for
"Final Account" .


https://youtu.be/KgkG6N9tx3A

 

Fight  for my life being  threatened ; fight against ongoing terror, psychological torture ( which UN and UN Human Rights deeply began to worry about 2 years ago) , MK Ultra ( which was reported by all Canadian media several years ago ) , poison ( how and why "Canada..." repeatedly poison me, UN Human Rights Office has them. One female witness shout :Don't drink it, that coffee. ), death threats and attempted murder by every possible means and with all possible Non-Lethal Weapons, especially EMF. I am not alone and I need your help.

https://ibb.co/ngL1B6V

 

Robin Yan

Canadian victim of torture

24/12/2025

2 attached file for reference .Please download ASAP.


Over 20 years, PM and Canadian government refuse to

https://tempsend.com/fhqyh

Or
https://ufile.io/dq1r76n8


Or,

https://fastupload.io/a9f54b30c4a3023c


Everything is clear for all

https://tempsend.com/vxvzx

Or,

https://ufile.io/oquvk3ov

Or,

https://fastupload.io/bf38286d28c946a8

 


justin.trudeau@parl.gc.ca
sgcentral@un.org
vturk@ohchr.org
sssgeneva@un.org
controlcenter.security-unog@un.org
information@icj-cij.org
Fadi.El-Abdallah@icc-cpi.int
petitions@ohchr.org
iba@int-bar.org
CP@ohchr.org
dpa-scsb3@un.org
hrc-sr-torture@un.org
otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int
urgent-action@ohchr.org
ohchr-petitions@un.org
iba@int-bar.org
ohchr-reprisals@un.org
unvfvt@ohchr.org
ohchr-infoDesk@un.org
birnbackn@un.org
hector.calderon@un.org
coutrix@un.org
apply@unpeacekeepingforces.org
leave@unpeacekeepingforces.org


 

Read more…

I accuse

I have a great need to inform the Russians as a people who liberated Auschwitz and at the same time felt the shame that belongs to the same human species, what it looks like to have a programmed dream, perfectly convincing in my school example of a digital Auschwitz, a dream of suffocation with poisonous gas in a gas chamber! The dream was programmed for me by Serbs, pro-Russian oriented because of my support for the most massive student demonstration in the 21st century in Serbia with the slogan our hands are boody"!

Likewise, I use the oportunity to admonish the Germans who created Auschwitz for not putting pressure on the disclosure of crimes all over the world, those  whose exceeds their own!

And above all, with such an intense experience of creeping during that programmed nightmare, I invite all those Jews around rhe world whose anccestors died in gas chambers to testify to them about what their first moments of crawling looked like before dying!

And the message for the rest of the world is: "Celebrate in a few months eighty years since the victory of the anti-fascist world, if you are not ashamed!"

Read more…

 accessnow.org

UN@accessnow.org

WAVERING RESOLUTIONS:  THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL ON DIGITAL RIGHTS

Digital, cyber, and human rights in the language of UN Security Council resolutions between 2001-2023 June 2024

CC license (CC-BY 4.0)

For more information, contact: UN@accessnow.org

Wavering resolutions: the UN Security Council resolutions in the digital age

Annex: relevant language from General Assembly resolutions

A/RES/73/173 - Promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms, including the rights to peaceful assembly and freedom of association

  • 4. Calls upon all States to ensure that the same rights that individuals have offline, including the rights to freedom of expression, of peaceful assembly and of association,are also fully protected online, in accordance with human rights law, particularly byrefraining from Internet shutdowns and content restrictions on the Internet thatviolate international human rights law, by ending attacks by States and takingsteps to end attacks by non-State actors against journalists and other mediaworkers covering demonstrations and protests and by ending governmentshutdowns of media outlets for attempting to report on such protests, andcondemns unequivocally and calls for an end to all attacks and violence by State andnon-State actors against journalists and media workers, including through attacks on,or the forced closure of, their offices and media outlets, in both conflict andnon-conflict situations, in particular for journalists and media outlets covering orattempting to cover demonstrations and protests

A/RES/74/173 - Promoting technical assistance and capacity-building to strengthen national measures and international cooperation to combat cybercrime, including information-sharingStressing the need to enhance coordination and cooperation among Member States in combating cybercrime, including by providing technical assistance to developing countries, upon request, to improve national legislation and enhance the capacity of national authorities to deal with cybercrime in all its forms, including its prevention, detection, investigation, and prosecution, emphasizing in this context the role that the United Nations, in particular the Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice, plays, and reaffirming the importance of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms in the use of information and communication technologies

  • 5. Encourages Member States to develop and implement measures to ensure thatcybercrime and crimes in which electronic evidence is relevant can be effectivelyinvestigated and prosecuted at the national level and that effective internationalcooperation can be obtained in this area, in accordance with domestic law andconsistent with relevant and applicable international law, including applicableinternational human rights instruments

A/RES/76/227 - Countering disinformation for the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms 

Wavering resolutions:

the UN Security Council resolutions in the digital age

  • Stressing that responses to the spread of disinformation must comply with international human rights law and the principles of legality, necessity, and proportionality, and underlining the importance of free, independent, plural, and diverse media and of providing and promoting access to independent, factual, and evidence-based information to counter disinformation
  • Reaffirming the need to ensure that efforts to counter disinformation promote andprotect and do not violate individuals’ freedom of expression and freedom to seek,receive, and impart information, and noting that media and information-relatedtechnology literacy can help to achieve this through independent and free media,awareness-raising, and a focus on the empowerment of people
  • Encouraging States, international and regional organizations, national human rightsinstitutions and civil society, business enterprises, including media, online platforms,social media, and technology companies, to foster respect for human rights onlineand offline in the context of new and emerging digital technologies and human rightsdue diligence processes
  •  Emphasizes that all forms of disinformation can negatively impact the enjoymentof human rights and fundamental freedoms, as well as the attainment of theSustainable Development Goals
  • 6. Expresses concern about the spread of disinformation and propaganda, includingon the Internet, which can be designed and implemented so as to mislead, to violatehuman rights, including the rights to privacy and to freedom of expression, tospread hatred, racism, xenophobia, negative stereotyping or stigmatization, and toincite violence, discrimination and hostility, and emphasizes the importantcontribution by journalists in countering this trend
  • Encourages online platforms, including social media companies, to review their business models and ensure that their design and development processes, theirbusiness operations, data collection and data processing practices are in line with theGuiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, and emphasizes theimportance of conducting human rights due diligence of their products, particularlyof the role of algorithms and ranking systems in amplifying disinformation, and callsupon them to adopt and make publicly available, after consultation with all relevantstakeholders, clear, transparent, narrowly defined content and advertising policies oncountering disinformation that are in line with international human rights law
  • Underlines that countering disinformation requires multidimensional and multi-stakeholder responses that are in compliance with international human rights

Wavering resolutions:

the UN Security Council resolutions in the digital age law and the proactive engagement of international organizations, States, business enterprises, and all other stakeholders

  • Invites the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights,special procedures, treaty bodies, and all other human rights mechanisms and entitiesof the United Nations, within their respective mandates, to consider, as appropriate,addressing the impact of disinformation on human rights

A/RES/75/176 - The right to privacy in the digital age

  • Noting that the rapid pace of technological development enables individuals all overthe world to use new information and communications technologies, and at the sametime enhances the capacity of Governments, business enterprises, and individuals toundertake surveillance, interception, and data collection, which may violate or abusehuman rights, in particular the right to privacy, as set out in Article 12 of theUniversal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 17 of the InternationalCovenant on Civil and Political Rights, and is therefore an issue of increasingconcern
  • Reaffirming the human right to privacy, according to which no one shall be subjectedto arbitrary or unlawful interference with his or her privacy, family, home, orcorrespondence, and the right to the protection of the law against such interference,and recognizing that the exercise of the right to privacy is important for the realizationof the right to freedom of expression and to hold opinions without interference andthe right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association, and is one of thefoundations of a democratic society
  • Recognizing the need to further discuss and analyze, based on international humanrights law, issues relating to the promotion and protection of the right to privacy inthe digital age, procedural safeguards, effective domestic oversight and remedies, theimpact of surveillance on the right to privacy and other human rights, as well asthe need to examine the principles of non-arbitrariness, lawfulness, legality, necessity,and proportionality in relation to surveillance practices,
  • Noting also that the use of artificial intelligence can contribute to the promotion andprotection of human rights and has the potential to transform governments andsocieties, economic sectors, and the world of work and can also have various farreaching implications, including with regard to the right to privacy
  • Expressing concern about the spread of disinformation and misinformation,particularly on social media platforms, which can be designed and implemented soas to mislead, to spread racism, xenophobia, negative stereotyping, and

Wavering resolutions:

the UN Security Council resolutions in the digital age stigmatization, to violate and abuse human rights, including the right to privacy, to impede freedom of expression, including the freedom to seek, receive, and impart information, and to incite all forms of violence, hatred, intolerance, discrimination, and hostility, and emphasizing the important contribution of journalists, civil society, and academia in countering this trend

  • Emphasizing that States must respect international human rights obligationsregarding the right to privacy when they intercept digital communications ofindividuals and/or collect personal data, when they share or otherwise provide accessto data collected through, inter alia, information- and intelligence-sharing agreementsand when they require disclosure of personal data from third parties, including business enterprises

A/RES/78/213 - Promotion & protection of human rights in the context of digital technologies

  • Reiterating that all human rights are universal, indivisible, interrelated,interdependent and mutually reinforcing, and affirming that the same rights that
    people have offline must also be protected online
  • Noting that the increasing use of digital technologies has impacts on the enjoyment of a wide range of human rights, and recognizing that digital technologies can work as enablers of human rights, but that, without appropriate safeguards, they can be used to seriously threaten the protection and full enjoyment of human rights
  • Recognizing the need to ensure that human rights are promoted, respected,protected, and fulfilled through the entirety of digital technologies’ life cycle,including through their conception, design, development, deployment, use,evaluation, and regulation, and to ensure that they are subject to adequate safeguardsin order to promote a free, open, universal, interoperable, safe, secure, stable,accessible, and affordable digital environment for all
  • Recognizing also that certain applications of new and emerging digitaltechnologies are not compatible with international human rights law, and notingthat uses of new and emerging digital technologies that impact the enjoyment ofhuman rights may lack adequate regulation and governance mechanisms, andrecognizing the need for accountability and effective measures to prevent, mitigate,and remedy potential and actual adverse human rights impacts of such technologiesin line with obligations of States under international human rights law andresponsibilities of business enterprises in line with the Guiding Principles on Businessand Human Rights

Wavering resolutions:

the UN Security Council resolutions in the digital age

  • Recognizing further that a lack of access to affordable, safe, quality, and reliabletechnologies and services remains a critical challenge in many developing countries
  • Stressing the importance for all Member States, and stakeholders as appropriate, topromote universal, free, open, interoperable, safe, reliable, and secure use of andaccess to the Internet by facilitating international cooperation aimed at thedevelopment of media and information and communications facilities in all countries,by respecting and protecting human rights and by refraining from unduerestrictions, such as Internet shutdowns, arbitrary or unlawful surveillance, oronline censorship
  • Underlining that digital contexts provide opportunities for exercising human rights,including by improving access to information, and by seeking, receiving, and impartinginformation and ideas of all kinds, and emphasizing that efforts to promote access todigital technologies, digital, media and information literacy, civic participation, andonline safety are important to bridge digital divides and ensure digital inclusion in itsbroader interpretation, which includes the development of digital skills
  • Noting with deep concern the use of technological tools developed by the privatesurveillance industry and by private or public actors to undertake surveillance,hacking of devices and systems, interception and disruption of communications,and data collection, interfering with the professional and private lives of individuals, including those engaged in the promotion and defense of humanrights and fundamental freedoms, journalists, and other media workers, inviolation or abuse of their human rights
  • Noting that the use of algorithmic or automated decision-making processes cannegatively affect the enjoyment of human rights, including by perpetuatingstereotypes or by resulting in discrimination, in particular when the data used for thetraining of algorithms are non-representative, inaccurate, or irrelevant
  • Noting with concern that artificial intelligence or machine-learning technologies,without human rights safeguards, as well as proper technical, regulatory, legal,and ethical safeguards, and without adequate and effective evaluation and feedback mechanisms, may pose the risk of reinforcing systemic, racial, andgender-based discrimination and can lead to decisions that have the potential to affectthe enjoyment of human rights, including economic, social, and cultural rights, andaffect non-discrimination, and recognizing the need to prevent racial and otherwise discriminatory outcomes and apply international human rights law anddata-protection frameworks in the conception, design, development, deployment,use, evaluation, and regulation of these technologies and practices

Wavering resolutions:

the UN Security Council resolutions in the digital age

  • Recognizing that persons in vulnerable situations, including children, may be particularly exposed to online risks, and that there is a need to take steps to ensurethat the digital environment, including safety information, protective strategies,services, and forums relating to it, is accessible, inclusive, and safe
  • Calls upon all Member States: (a) To consider developing or maintaining and implementing adequate legislation, in consultation with all relevant stakeholders,including business enterprises, international organizations, civil society, andtechnical and academic communities, with effective sanctions and appropriateremedies, that protects individuals against violations and abuses of their human rights in the digital context
  • Calls upon the private sector and all relevant stakeholders to ensure thatrespect for human rights is incorporated into the conception, design, development,deployment, operation, use, evaluation, and regulation of all new and emerging digitaltechnologies and to provide for redress and effective remedy for the human rightsabuses that they may cause, contribute to, or to which they may be directly linkedA/78/L.49 - Seizing the opportunities of safe, secure, and trustworthy artificial intelligencesystems for sustainable development
  • Recognizing also that the improper or malicious design, development, deployment,and use of artificial intelligence systems, such as without adequate safeguards or in amanner inconsistent with international law, pose risks that could hinder progresstowards the achievement of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and itsSustainable Development Goals, and undermine sustainable development in itsthree dimensions – economic, social, and environmental; widen digital dividesbetween and within countries; reinforce structural inequalities and biases; lead to discrimination; undermine information integrity and access to information;undercut the protection, promotion, and enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms, including the right not to be subject to unlawful orarbitrary interference with one’s privacy; and increase the potential risk foraccidents and compound threats from malicious actors
  • Emphasizes that human rights and fundamental freedoms must be respected,protected and promoted throughout the life cycle of artificial intelligence systems, calls upon all Member States and, where applicable, other stakeholders to refrain fromor cease the use of artificial intelligence systems that are impossible to operate incompliance with international human rights law or that pose undue risks to the

Wavering resolutions:

the UN Security Council resolutions in the digital age enjoyment of human rights, especially of those who are in vulnerable situations, and reaffirms that the same rights that people have offline must also be protected online, including throughout the life cycle of artificial intelligence systems

  • Encourages all Member States, where appropriate, in line with their nationalpriorities and circumstances and while implementing their distinct national regulatoryand governance approaches and frameworks, and, where applicable, otherstakeholders to promote safe, secure, and trustworthy artificial intelligence systems inan inclusive and equitable manner, and for the benefit of all, and foster anenabling environment for such systems to address the world’s greatestchallenges, including achieving sustainable development in its three dimensions– economic, social and environmental – with specific consideration of developingcountries and leaving no one behind [...]
Read more…

https://www.fordfoundation.org/news-and-stories/stories/protecting-free-speech-in-the-digital-age-qa-with-un-special-rapporteur-for-freedom-of-expression/

Ford Foundation

 Protecting free speech in the digital age: Q&A with UN special rapporteur for freedom of expression

11 October 2016

Alberto Cerda Silva, Former Program Officer, Technology and Society

  • How is the Internet changing the right to free speech, press, and expression?
  • David Kaye, the United Nations special rapporteur for freedom of expression and opinion, grapples with this question every day. Appointed in 2014, Kaye acts as an independent expert working on behalf of the UN to protect the human rights required for freedom of expression. He collaborates with governments and private actors—such as journalists, activists, academics, artists, and civil society—to monitor and address human rights violations and controversial legislation that inhibits free speech, media, and expression.
  • In his role, he also presents reports and legislative comments on these issues to the UN Human Rights Council, the UN General Assembly, and regional governments. In fact, Kaye recently submitted legislative comments against a US Homeland Security proposal to request travelers’ social media information on certain immigration forms because it could be used to discriminate against them based on their religious beliefs, race, political views, or opinions.
  • David Kaye recently visited the Ford Foundation, so I took the opportunity to ask him a few questions about his work and how protecting and ensuring people’s rights to freedom of expression are changing in an expanding digital world.
  • Alberto Cerda: What do you think are the major challenges inhibiting freedom of expression around the world today?
  • David Kaye: There is a long history of building a global framework to protect people’s rights to freedom of expression. For example, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which 168 states have ratified (including the United States), outlines the civil and political rights of individuals, and Article 19 of the ICCPR is dedicated to freedom of expression. It recognizes that governments may restrict freedom of expression when it’s necessary and proportionate to protect national security, public order, and the rights of others.
  • Unfortunately, right now, we’re seeing a global assault on freedom of expression. Around the world, governments are stretching the meaning of what’s permitted: They define national security in broad, vague ways that make it difficult for individuals to know what speech or opinions are allowed and what may be subject to penalty, they apply restrictions that go well beyond what is necessary to address specific threats, and they fail to justify their restrictions. We see this happening particularly in the digital space, with restrictions on the media, and with attacks against civil society and organizing.
  • What does the right to freedom of expression mean in today’s digital age? What new challenges and issues do you see emerging?
  • The Internet and digital communications technology pose new challenges for freedom of expression, but they are actually the same problems we’ve seen since the advent of human rights law: governments trying to restrict the flow of information, clamp down on criticism, and keep track of citizens. The digital information age provides remarkable access to information and ideas, but by participating in it, we often unknowingly sacrifice our privacy and personal information to governments and companies. I have taken to saying that we no longer just read the newspaper; the newspaper reads us.
  • One example is related to the freedom to maintain opinions without interference. There is limited interpretation around this right because the authors of Article 19 likely believed the right to hold an opinion is indisputable—governments can’t access what’s in our minds. However, today we digitally store so much of what’s in our minds in the cloud, on our laptops, and on our local servers, the very places subject to attack and surveillance by governments. I’m worried that privacy concerns resulting from the wealth of information available online will lead to a lack of information sharing on digital platforms and self-censorship.
  • How have freedom of expression issues, especially those related to freedom of press and speech, evolved in the digital age?
  • The digital age has fundamentally allowed for any voice to capture an audience, expanding our options to many more communications platforms and outlets beyond mainstream media outlets. Part of my mandate is to protect the voices of journalists and the media, and as the number of media outlets increases, so do the voices that need protecting. Several years ago, people thought new forms of social media like Twitter and Weibo would harm traditional journalism. While journalism is changing, long-form writing is thriving and legacy media outlets are adopting innovative ways to display information and tell stories, such as the use of virtual reality. The threats to expression online must not overshadow the opportunity for expansion of innovation, creativity, and expression.
  • You’ve written a lot about the importance of encryption and anonymity in protecting freedom of expression. Can you explain why encryption and anonymity are so important?
  • Both encryption and anonymity are fundamental to creating the privacy and security necessary for free thought and expression. But too often they are described as tools used by criminals and terrorists. While bad people and actors will always make use of these tools, as with any morally neutral technology, the reality is, activists, journalists, artists, and even law enforcement officials around the world depend on encryption and sometimes anonymity to protect themselves and their important work.
  • There are vulnerable communities whose members can only engage in communications with one another if they do so in a secure way. My 2015 report alluded to some of these groups, such as LGBT communities or religious minorities in hostile environments, or simply those seeking information about politically or socially unpopular topics. When they are not geographically close to each other and need to communication digitally, encryption ensures their security. Anonymity also provides the ability for individuals to seek out information that if not protected could lead to stigmatization, discrimination, or worse.
  • Here at the foundation when we talk about freedom of expression, we often think about artists and journalists. Can you talk about the role artists and journalists play in the rights you are trying to protect and the challenges they face trying to do this?
  • Article 19 protects everyone’s right to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas of all kinds—including journalists and artists. Journalists serve as watchdogs over governments and the private sector and draw the public’s attention to important issues. Governments and private actors in many places try to silence journalists and create threatening environments for them. For example, last year, I published a report about how confidential sources and whistleblowers, like Edward Snowden, are a crucial element of a healthy democracy, and that governments should protect them rather than prosecute them.
  • Likewise, artists expand the value and dynamism of public life through self-expression. When they use their art to uncover bad government or corporate behavior, they often can experience backlash and suppression. Protecting the rights of artists is a new part of my work and my team and I are thinking through how best to do it. We are at the early stages of planning a meeting to convene artists, advocates, and academics to think through new approaches to protecting artistic expression.
  • Free speech and expression rights usually fall under the responsibility of governments, but more and more we see that companies have a role as well. What role does the private sector have in protecting these rights?
  • Companies like Facebook and Twitter have created digital platforms where billions of people around the world voice their opinions and thoughts. While these spaces behave as open forums, the regulations, community standards, and terms of service that govern them are dictated by the companies themselves. Human rights law and global standards are not necessarily considered in these guidelines. At the same time, governments pressure these companies to censor content or shut down networks in times of public protest, as well as to solve public policy problems like expanding access to online resources.
  • What additional issues and challenges do you plan to prioritize in the coming years?
  • The most pressing issues are government interference with expression—such as censoring groups or blocking Internet access—and private sector regulation, such as Facebook or Twitter removing controversial posts. They present real challenges to how we protect and promote freedom of expression today, especially when governments pressure private companies to interfere with free expression.
  • I am also concerned that the growing abuse—such as misogyny, racism, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, et cetera—in digital spaces could push many people to opt out entirely. That’s a real loss. We need to find ways to protect expression but also protect those subject to real abuse.
Read more…

https://reliefweb.int/report/world/joint-declaration-freedom-expression-and-elections-digital-age-0

www.oas.org/en/iachr/expression/showarticle.asp?artID=1174&lID=1 1/3

4/30/2020 OAS :: Special Rapporteurship for Freedom of Expression

Quote of the day

The right to freedom of expression is not a concession by the States but a fundamental right Preambule of the Declaration of Principles on Freedom of
Expression

JOINT DECLARATION ON FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND ELECTIONS IN THE
DIGITAL AGE


The United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Representative on Freedom of the Media, and the Organization of American States (OAS) Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression,

Having discussed these issues together with the assistance of ARTICLE 19, Global Campaign for Free Expression, and the Centre for Law and Democracy (CLD);

Recalling and reaffirming our Joint Declarations of 26 November 1999, 30 November 2000, 20 November 2001, 10 December 2002, 18 December 2003, 6 December 2004, 21 December 2005, 19 December 2006, 12 December 2007, 10 December 2008, 15 May 2009, 3 February 2010, 1 June 2011, 25 June 2012, 4 May 2013, 6 May 2014, 4 May 2015, 4 May 2016, 3 March 2017, 2 May 2018 and 10 July 2019;

Highlighting the essential role that freedom of expression and information, free, independent and diverse media and a free and accessible Internet play in ensuring free and fair elections, including referenda, in particular by informing the public about parties and candidates and their platforms;

Noting, in particular, the role of public service media, where they exist, during elections including by providing candidates and parties with equitable access to the public, a platform for political debates, and impartial and accurate information on election related issues;

Recognising the importance to democracy of a vibrant media landscape, of robust public debate about matters of public interest, and of the public having access to a diverse range of information and ideas;

Aware of contemporary challenges to freedom of expression and freedom of the media, brought about in part by a significant evolution of the means of communication, the convergence of legacy and digital media, and the increasingly central role played by social media and digital technologies, as well as the need for the normative framework governing freedom of expression to reflect these changes and to promote transparent and accountable oversight of online content moderation;

Cognisant of the positive potential of digital technologies during elections, including to give voters access to information and to empower them to express their opinions and interact directly with candidates, and to give candidates and parties, including those with limited resources, the ability to disseminate their messages and mobilise support;

Expressing grave concern about the threats and violent attacks that journalists may face during elections and the fact that targeted smear campaigns against journalists, and especially female journalists, undermine their work and public trust and confidence in journalism;

Calling on governments to refrain from abusing their positions to bias media coverage, whether on the part of publicly-owned or private media, or to disseminate propaganda that may influence election outcomes;

Denouncing dis-, mis- and mal-information and "hate speech", which can exacerbate and even generate election related tensions, calling on parties and candidates to avoid intentionally using these types of statements to enhance their electoral 4/30/2020 OAS :: Special Rapporteurship for Freedom of Expression
www.oas.org/en/iachr/expression/showarticle.asp?artID=1174&lID=1 2/3 prospects and recognising the important role played by independent election regulators in addressing these forms of speech and promoting access to information;

Alarmed about the misuse of social media by both state and private actors to subvert election processes, including through various forms of inauthentic behaviour and the use of "computational propaganda" (employing automated tools to influence behaviour);

Concerned that many States are passing laws which, while formally justified by reference to the problems noted above, unduly limit freedom of expression, expand State control over the media, restrict Internet freedom and/or further the ability of various actors to collect personal data;

Deploring restrictions on the ability of the public to access the Internet, including complete or partial shutdowns, which seriously limit the ability of media, parties, candidates and others to communicate with the public, as well as the ability of members of the public to access information;

Stressing the need for robust rules and systems requiring transparency of parties and candidates in relation to media spending on elections;

Mindful that elections around the world are scheduled to take place in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, creating new barriers for reporting, sometimes imposed unjustifiably by State actors, at a moment when voters have an overriding need to access a range of information and ideas to make informed electoral decisions;

Adopt, on 30 April 2020, as part of the celebrations of World Press Freedom Day, the following Joint Declaration on Freedom of Expression and Elections in the Digital Age:

1. Recommendations to States

a. General Principles
i. States should put in place a regulatory and institutional framework that promotes a free, independent and diverse media, in both the legacy and digital media sectors, which is able to provide voters with access to comprehensive, accurate and reliable information about parties, candidates and the wider electoral process.
ii. States should promote effective access to the Internet and other digital technologies for all parts of population, including by closing digital gaps based on gender, race, ethnicity, disability, socio-economic status and other bases, and putting in place clear requirements and policies to ensure respect for the principle of net neutrality.
iii. States should ensure that any restrictions on freedom of expression that apply during election periods comply with the international law three-part test requirements of legality, legitimacy of aim and necessity, which implies the following:

1) There should be no prior censorship of the media, including through means such as the administrative blocking of media websites or Internet shutdowns.
2) Any limits on the right to disseminate electoral statements should conform to international standards, including that public figures should be required to tolerate a higher degree of criticism and scrutiny than ordinary citizens.
3) There should be no general or ambiguous laws on disinformation, such as prohibitions on spreading "falsehoods" or "nonobjective information".
4) Any limits imposed on media reporting on public opinion polls during elections should also be in strict conformity with the threepart test.

iv. State actors should never use their positions or power to undertake measures with a view to unduly influencing media reporting, including on elections, whether direct measures, such as through licensing of the media or exercising control over public media or media regulators, or indirect measures, such as by limiting access to newsprint, radio frequencies or the ability of media outlets to distribute their products freely throughout the country.
v. State actors should ensure that the media enjoys robust access to sources of official information and to candidates for public office, and does not face undue barriers to their ability to disseminate such information and ideas, including during the public health pandemic of COVID-19, and including by implementing the principles of this Joint Declaration.

b. Election Coverage by the Media
i. The media, both legacy and digital, should be exempted from liability during election periods for disseminating statements made directly by parties or candidates unless the statements have specifically been held to be unlawful by an independent and impartial court or regulatory body, or the statements constitute incitement to violence and the media outlet had a genuine opportunity to prevent their dissemination.
ii. Any administrative body which has the power to oversee rules relating to the media during election periods should be independent of the government and its decisions should be subject to timely judicial review.
iii. All publicly-owned media should, during election periods, ensure that the public is informed about election matters, respect strict rules of fairness, impartiality and balance, and grant all parties and candidates equitable opportunities to communicate directly with the public, either for free or at subsidised rates.
iv. Any rules on election spending which are designed to create a level electoral playing field should be applicable to legacy and digital media, taking into account their differences, including rules about transparency of political advertising.
v. States should make a concerted effort to promote digital media and information literacy, including in relation to elections.

4/30/2020 OAS :: Special Rapporteurship for Freedom of Expression
www.oas.org/en/iachr/expression/showarticle.asp?artID=1174&lID=1 3/3

vi. Directing targeted political advertising, based on personal data, at individuals through the media should not be allowed, especially during
election periods, unless those individuals have consented to the use of their personal data for this purpose.

c. Restrictions on Freedom of Expression/Media Freedom During Elections
i. States should consider supporting positive measures to address online disinformation, such as the promotion of independent factchecking mechanisms and public education campaigns, while avoiding adopting rules criminalising disinformation.
ii. States should adopt appropriately clear and proportionate laws that prohibit the dissemination of statements which are specifically designed to obstruct individuals’ right to vote, such as by intentionally spreading incorrect information about where or when to vote.
iii. States have a special obligation to take rapid and effective measures to prevent, protect, investigate, prosecute and punish attacks, threats, intimidation and harassment, offline and online, against journalists and other media workers, including against their property and families, during election periods, particularly where State actors are or may be involved. This obligation is especially pronounced in relation to female journalists and individuals belonging to marginalised groups.
iv. Online intermediaries should not be held liable for dis-, mis- or mal-information that has been disseminated over their platforms unless they specifically intervene in that content or fail to implement a legally binding order to remove that content.
d. Access to Information Relating to Elections
i. States should require media outlets, both legacy and digital, to make public information about their ownership, in accordance with principle of non-discrimination.
ii. Parties and candidates should be required to be transparent in a timely fashion, including to the media, regarding their spending on elections and, in particular, spending on legacy and digital media, and other digital communications efforts.
iii. State actors, including those responsible for regulating elections, should be fully transparent regarding any agreements or partnerships, whether formal or informal, they have regarding elections with online intermediaries and, in particular, digital and social media companies.

2. Recommendations for Non-State Actors

a. Digital Actors
i. Online intermediaries and digital media should implement the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and conduct due diligence to ensure that their products, policies and practices, including in the areas of collection of private data and micro-targeting of messages, do not interfere with human rights.
ii. Digital media and platforms should make a reasonable effort to adopt measures that make it possible for users to access a diversity of political views and perspectives. In particular, they should make sure that automated tools, such as algorithmic ranking, do not, whether intentionally or unintentionally, unduly hinder access to election related content and the availability of a diversity of viewpoints to users.
iii. Dominant online intermediaries should consider, as part of their due diligence, undertaking an assessment of whether their products, policies or practices regarding political advertising arbitrarily limit the ability of candidates or parties to disseminate their messages.
iv. Digital media and online intermediaries should make a reasonable effort to address dis-, mis- and mal-information and election related spam, including through independent fact-checking and other measures, such as advertisement archives, appropriate content moderation and public alerts.
v. Digital actors should, as relevant, be transparent about the use and any practical impact of any automated tools they use, albeit not necessarily the specific coding by which those tools operate, including inasmuch as those tools affect data harvesting, targeted advertising, and the sharing, ranking and/or removal of content, especially election-related content.

b. Other stakeholders
i. Broadcast media should not interfere with the broadcast of third party election content unless they have been ordered to do so by a court or an independent and impartial regulatory body (including of an administrative nature), or are nearly certain that this is necessary to prevent substantial harm to a legitimate interest, such as through an act of violence.
ii. Parties, politicians and candidates should refrain from limiting the ability of media and journalists to access any public communications they make related to elections.
iii. Media outlets, both legacy and digital, should be transparent about the methodologies used in any public opinion polls they conduct or report on.


© Copyright 2020 OAS
Internships Fellowships Vacancies Terms & Conditions Contact Us Related Links
1889 F St. N.W. Washington, DC, U.S.A. 20006 / E-mail: cidhoea@oas.org / Phone: (202) 370-9000 / Fax: (202) 458-3650

Read more…

please send at once, they are mad, mad, mad

 

 


Please send to ICC prosecutor , UN Human Right Council , UN Peacekeeping and UN Human Rights Chief, UN Security Council...Thanks.

 

Rogers' Fido is extremely , madly hiding and filtering this file from backstage after I save it as PDF. So, I can't upload to file transfer.


Please send to Prime Minister of Canada, Canadian government , ICC , UN's Highest Court , UNS Peacekeeping and UN Human Rights Chief, UN Security Council... because of their ongoing evil, brutality and terror in Ontario, Canada.

Prime Minister of Canada, Canadian government refuse to take actions they should to stop my all neighbours, at least 3 Philippine couples, who don't work at all for 20 years .....war criminals and criminals against humanity according to ICC, Canada's No.1 media , various investigators , especially foreign ones, " What you can't see can murder you."


justin.trudeau@parl.gc.ca
sgcentral@un.org
antonio.guterres@un.org
vturk@ohchr.org
sssgeneva@un.org
controlcenter.security-unog@un.org
information@icj-cij.org
Fadi.El-Abdallah@icc-cpi.int
petitions@ohchr.org
iba@int-bar.org
CP@ohchr.org
dpa-scsb3@un.org
hrc-sr-torture@un.org
otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int
urgent-action@ohchr.org
ohchr-petitions@un.org
iba@int-bar.org
ohchr-reprisals@un.org
unvfvt@ohchr.org
ohchr-infoDesk@un.org

Prime Minister of Canada, Canadian government...have known my all neighbours' IDs, at least 3 Philippine couples.

1. https://ibb.co/wM9RBsk ( Rogers' Fido changed this address on my cellphone notepad from backstage 5 years ago.)

2. https://ibb.co/5B7KBDL ( Rogers' Fido changed this address on my cellphone notepad from backstage 5 years ago.)


But, they still wear invisibility cloaks,

https://ibb.co/QHmDC4r (  invisibility cloaks )

enter, hide in my house and my house attic without using any doors to do everything possible, evil, and brutal. They keep attacking madly my hearing with Microwave weapons, Sonic Weapons; they keep attacking madly my head with rays guns, they keep attacking my heart with some microwave weapons confirmed by the University of Toronto, they keep committing terror, psychological torture, and MK Ultra. Any of them can destroy your body and your life totally. I can't work and sleep normally for over 20 years. For 20 years, I have hardly had one good and whole sleep. In my work place, ...they commit madly terror, psychological torture, and MK Ultra , which were disclosed and reported by UN Human Rights Office, UN Human Rights Council and all Canadian media several years ago. Their drones, aircrafts, special vehicles are tracing and following me everywhere and anywhere in Ontario...Canada. UN Human Rights Office, UN Human Rights Council have the photos and videos about their drones. Some app exactly showed me who they are. For what? Do what?


How did I find it, how do I find it now? Both UN Human Rights and Human Rights Council knew it 10 years ago, by floor vibration "sensors ", and something else.


https://ibb.co/ngL1B6V ( Microwave weapons, rays guns )

https://ibb.co/Yh0TP1y (Sonic weapons , they hack the Sonic weapons in "their " hands during G20 in Toronto, Canada .)


Fight  for my life being  threatened ; fight against ongoing terror, psychological torture ( which UN and UN Human Rights deeply began to worry about 2 years ago) , MK Ultra ( which was reported by all Canadian media several years ago ) , poison ( how and why "Canada..." repeatedly poison me, UN Human Rights Office has them. One witness shout :don't drink it. ), death threats and attempted murder by every possible means and with all possible Non-Lethal Weapons, especially EMF. I am not alone and I need your help.

https://ibb.co/ngL1B6V

 

Robin Yan

Canadian victim of torture

14/09/2024


Please transfer to International Bar Association, UN Human Rights Office , UN Human Rights Council by fax  and sr-torture@ohchr.org, thanks.

 

Read more…


Canada's internet provides , Rogers' Fido
by refreshing the webpage , is stopping me from sending message to UNs Peacekeeping. So, I send it again, thanks.

Urgent.

Stop them, force Canada to arrest them to hand over them ; and force Canada to...

https://peacepink.ning.com/

This website is " last stop" for me. No any social medias will allow me to write and post what I want after a few days. Imagine they in Canada are now 404ing, 403ing, filtering, blocking all UN's websites, plus International Bar Association's, and UN Peacekeeping's, plus everything with IP, MAC, Bluetooth I am using.


Recently after ICC Prosecutor and UN Human Rights Chief/Office contacted me by Not Regular Emails, they in Ontario, Canada are attacking madly / remotely controlling my heart, my hearing, my head, and my body with all possible Non-Lethal Weapons , regular drones , special drones and aircrafts. UN Human Rights Office has the photos and the videos; especially, with Hearing Jammers, Microwave and EMF Weapons.

https://ibb.co/ngL1B6V


How Hearing Jammers works

https://ibb.co/swWJSk6

Or,

https://tempsend.com/vedug

And,

UN , EMF effects on human beings

https://ibb.co/Wzj0FVL

Or,

https://tempsend.com/zjsjj


Jammers for hearing control

https://ibb.co/dfmQQ7S

Or,

https://ibb.co/YRwPVCV

Or,

https://tempsend.com/sanej


From them below , you can see what they are committing, lasting over 20 years. A few years ago, UN, UN Human Rights Office /Chief, UN Human Rights Council disclosed everything about their serious crimes for our whole world, Terror, Psychological Torture, and MK Ultra.

https://tempsend.com/wzcyk

and,

https://tempsend.com/yqwek

;

https://ibb.co/7r1cHb0

and,

https://ibb.co/4s5Qjz5

;

https://fastupload.io/de0d6427218bd547

and,

https://fastupload.io/fd1901c642060758


Psychological torture

Forty-third session
24 February - 20 March 2020
Agenda item 3

Mind weapons, MK Ultra, weapons of mass destruction by UN Human Rights Office and UN :


https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Torture/Call/Individuals/ElectromagneticTorture.pdf

justin.trudeau@parl.gc.ca
sgcentral@un.org
sssgeneva@un.org
controlcenter.security-unog@un.org
information@icj-cij.org
Fadi.El-Abdallah@icc-cpi.int
petitions@ohchr.org
iba@int-bar.org
CP@ohchr.org
dpa-scsb3@un.org
hrc-sr-torture@un.org
otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int
urgent-action@ohchr.org
ohchr-petitions@un.org
iba@int-bar.org
ohchr-reprisals@un.org
unvfvt@ohchr.org
ohchr-infoDesk@un.org

 

 

Read more…

 

1. 變態控機賤人由星期二 (4日)早上5:30開始,遙控電子武器令我劇烈頭痛至星期四稍為減緩,持續電子武器摧殘超過57小時,摧殘仍間歇性進行中。。。

 

同時遙控電子武器攻擊我喉嚨,鼻腔,令我咳嗽和流鼻水。原因是政府將會推出新政策,需打疫苗才可進入食肆,很多人都趁元旦假期去打疫苗,包括我在內。變態控機賤人為了掩飾電子武器摧殘事實,將微波疾病嫁禍於疫苗,所以發起大規模屠城。

 

據消息透露,保守估計此57小時電子武器摧殘,引致超過一萬人死亡(由複製人和機械人換上),交通意外超過20單,自殺更是沒辦法統計。

 

政府以疫情擴散之名,收緊社交生活。正值中國新年將近,也是中國傳統一家團聚之時,明知所有確診都是來自電子武器摧殘引起,偏偏在此期間計劃封關,司馬超之心路人皆知。家庭成員在分隔兩地超過2-3年,相信再見面時就算被換了人也不會引起太大的疑心吧,特別是小童。

 

2. 近期發生一件綁架事件,一位香港女子在德國被綁架,家人報警後,香港政府向德國警方提供女子藏身之坐標,但德國警方發現香港方提供的資料同實際藏身之處的坐標是相反,最終用德國政府資訊坐標而救出港人女子。

 

由此相信大家明白,此次綁架行動由誰所策劃,身為香港人的我們,每天都面對被綁架和死亡的威脅,而政府視若無睹,一次又一次提請政府,腦控空間有一大幚犯罪分子在窺探市民,對市民身家性命財產造成威脅,而政府不但不理,反而助紂為虐。到底我們的政府是否已死?,難道剩下的只是偽政府???

 

3. 在我被電子武器摧殘超過57小時後,有人問我為何不去取頭痛錢?我奇怪的反問,原來真是有頭痛錢取?到哪裡去取?如果有頭痛賠償,我何需訂立”懲罰性索償條款”,但未收到任何回應。我被腦控超過十年,被電子武器摧殘超過十年,但從不知道原來頭痛是有錢收,我很想知道到底一小時頭痛值多少錢?什麼人付頭痛錢?到哪裡去取?如讀者知道的,煩請告知為盼!

 

4. 之前提到有多位與我名字相同的銀行戶口,因涉嫌洗黑錢已被政府凍結,涉資約7億港幣。

 

Mind Control Space News this week (January 1 to 7, 2022)

 

1. The metamorphosis mind controller started at 5:30am on Tuesday (4th), remote-control electronic harassment caused me headache until Thursday. The attack continued for more than 57 hours, and the harassment was still keep going. . .

 

At the same time, remote-controlled electronic weapons attacked my throat and nasal cavity, caused me for cough and runny nose. The reasons were that the government will have a proposal that requires at lease one vaccination to enter restaurants. Many people get vaccinations when New Year's holiday, I also token. 

 

In order to conceal the fact that electronic harassment for citizens, the metamorphosis mind controller put the microwave syndromes to the vaccine, so they launched a large-scale massacre. According to the news that at lease 10,000 deaths (then replaced by the clones),  there are more than 20 traffic accidents, and countless cases for suicides during 57 hours of electronic tortured.

 

The government will tightened social distance in coming few days. As the Chinese New Year is approaching, it is happy time when the traditional Chinese family getting together, the government knowing that all confirmed cases are caused by the electronic harassment, why still order to closed all the borders during this period? As we known, if family members separated more than 2-3 years, we may not recognized to each other, special for children, even changed the identity, may used such to cover the identity replacement.

 

2. There was a recent kidnapping incident, which a Hong Kong girl being kidnapped in Germany. After the family reported to the police, the Hong Kong side provided the GPS data for the girl’s hiding place to German police, but the German police found that the information provided by the Hong Kong side was on the contrary of actual hiding place, finally the German side used their own information to saved the girl’s life.

 

According to above, I believe everyone understood who planned the kidnapping. As Hong Kong people, we face the threat of kidnapping and death every day. The government turns a blind eye, we urged government few more times. There were a lots of criminals in the mind control space, stalking citizens, threatening the citizens’ lives and property, and the government not only ignores them, but also helps them to abuse citizens everyday, May our government dying? And replaced by perps government? ? ?

 

3. After I was tortured by electronic weapons for more than 57 hours, someone asked me why don’t you go to get the headache money? is it really have headache compensation money, if so, why I have a punitive compensation program? Where can I get it? not one give me response. I have being mind control more than ten years, and being electronic harassment 7/24, I never knew that someone will paid for headache. I really want to know how much an hour of headache is worth? Who pays for headaches? Where to get it, if the reader knows, please let me know!

 

4. As mentioned earlier, there are few of bank accounts which with the same name as mine, which have been frozen by the government due to suspicion of money laundering, and the capital involved is about 700 million Hong Kong dollars

Read more…

香港時間2021-12-31至2022-01-06

 

香港時間2021-12-31 (是日法律責任由林鄭特首,鄧炳強局長,䔥澤頤處長,施永青先生負責)

00:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將身處高噪音者同我併聽覺,令我不得安靜。精神虐待;

00:00-24:00 變態控機賤人全開我腦音,將多人同我併腦袋惡意思維干擾,潛聲誤導聽者;

01:00-08:00 變態賤人遙控電子武器攻擊我腿部穴位,令我雙腿不能伸直,痠痛難忍;

01:00-08:00 變態腦控賤人遙控電子武器令我半睡半醒; 潛聲,潛夢;

01:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將鼻塞者同我併呼吸和感覺,精神虐待;

01:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將呼吸道疾病者同我併呼吸和感覺,精神虐待;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人間歇性將我的嗅覺同身處污穢地方的人掉換。

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將比我實際體重高出60磅的肌肉鬆弛肥胖者同我併身體影響儀容和健康;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將眼睛老化,反光和白內障者同我併眼睛影響我視力和儀容;

08:00-24:00 換衫和如廁時, 變態控機賤人控老畜牲和肥賤者同我併感覺性騷擾;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人間歇性將智障, 文盲,反應遲鈍者輪流同我併腦子影響我書寫和語言能力,同時也令我記憶不完整;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將多人同我併身體大小便;

08:00-24:00變態控機賤人將多人同我併口飲食;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將麒麟腿者同我併身體影響儀容和精神虐待;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將糖尿病患者同我併感覺,令我腿痠疼沉重精神虐待;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將雙腿僵硬,不能下蹲者同我併感覺精神虐待;

08:00-08:20 變態腦控賤人遙控電子武器令我頭暈,頭痛;

08:00-24:00 變態腦控賤人間歇性遙控電子武器令我肚臍痕癢:

08:32-24:00 變態控機賤人將失禁,便溺者同我併感覺,精神虐待;

10:00-13:00 戴口罩時,變態控機賤人將呼吸困難,鼻塞者同我併感覺精神虐待;

10:00-10:50 當我閱讀時,變態控機賤人遙控電子武器思維干擾;

13:19-14:00 變態腦控賤人遙控電子武器令我1-5級頭痛;

14:15-16:00 變態控機賤人將左腿關節痛者同我併感覺精神虐待;

17:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將吸毒者同我併呼吸,令我鼻抽搐,精神虐待;

18:30 沐浴時, 變態控機賤人將3男1女同我併感覺性騷擾;

19:00-24:00 變態逐臭賤人間歇性遙控電子武器攻擊我穴位,令我放屁,空氣污染;

19:33-22:02 變態腦控賤人遙控電子武器令我1-5級頭痛;

 (因直接和間接併大量芯片原故,體重上昇至約130磅, 我實際體重是70磅)

 

香港時間2022-01-01(是日法律責任由林鄭特首,鄧炳強局長, 䔥澤頤處長,施永青先生負責)

00:00-24:00 變態控機賤人全開我腦音,將多人同我併腦袋惡意思維干擾,潛聲誤導聽者;

00:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將身處高噪音者同我併聽覺,令我不得安靜。精神虐待;

00:00-08:00 變態賤人遙控電子武器攻擊我腿部穴位,令我雙腿不能伸直,痠痛難忍;

00:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將鼻塞者同我併呼吸和感覺,精神虐待;

00:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將將多位呼吸道疾病者同我併感覺精神虐待;

00:00-08:00 變態控機賤人遙控電子武器令我半睡半醒; 潛聲,潛夢;

00:00-08:30 變態控機賤人將腰痛者同我併感覺精神虐待;

00:00-24:00 變態腦控賤人間歇性遙控電子武器令我肚臍痕癢

00:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將眼睛老化,反光和白內障者同我併眼睛影響儀容和視力聚焦;

00:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將喉嚨痛者同我併感覺,精神虐待;

08:00-24:00 換衫和如廁時, 變態控機賤人控老畜牲和肥賤者同我併感覺性騷擾;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將智障, 文盲, 反應遲鈍者間歇性同我併腦袋影響我書寫和語言能力;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將多人同我身體大小便;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將我換成不同人的樣貌;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將雙腿僵硬,不能下蹲者同我併感覺精神虐待;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人間歇性將我的嗅覺同身處污穢地方的人掉換。

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將比我實際體重高出60磅鬆弛肥胖者同我併身體影響儀容和健康;

08:00-24:00變態控機賤人將多人同我併口飲食;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將我換樣貌丑化;

11:00-11:30 當我閱讀時,變態控機賤人遙控電子武器思維干擾;

14:15-15:37 變態腦控賤人遙控電子武器令我1-5級頭痛;

14:26-14:44 變態腦控賤人遙控電子武器令我腿部抽筋;

14:30-20:30 戴口罩時,變態控機賤人將呼吸困難,口臭者同我併感覺精神虐待;

17:30-24:00 變態逐臭賤人間歇性遙控電子武器攻擊我穴位,令我放屁,空氣污染;

21:00 沐浴時, 變態控機賤人將1男1肥女同我併感覺性騷擾;

21:30-24:00 變態控機賤人將失禁,便溺者同我併感覺,精神虐待;

23:15-24:00 變態控機賤人將皮膚痕癢者同我併感覺精神虐待;

23:15-24:00 變態控機賤人將口臭者同我併感覺精神虐待;

(因直接和間接併大量芯片原故,體重上昇至約130磅, 我實際體重是70)

 

香港時間2022-01-02(是日法律責任由林鄭特首,鄧炳強局長, 䔥澤頤處長,施永青先生負責)

00:00-24:00 變態控機賤人全開我腦音,將多人同我併腦袋惡意思維干擾,潛聲誤導聽者;

00:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將身處高噪音者同我併聽覺,令我不得安靜。精神虐待;

00:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將鼻塞者同我併呼吸和感覺,精神虐待;

00:00-08:00 變態賤人遙控電子武器攻擊我腿部穴位,腿抽筋,沒法伸直;

00:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將多位呼吸道疾病者同我併呼吸精神虐待;

00:00-08:00 變態控機賤人遙控電子武器睡眠剥奪; 潛聲,潛夢;

00:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將眼睛老化,反光和白內障者同我併眼睛影響儀容和視力聚焦;

00:00-19:00 變態腦控賤人間歇性遙控電子武器令我肚臍痕癢:

00:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將喉嚨痛者同我併感覺,精神虐待;

08:00-10:00 變態腦控賤人遙控電子武器令我腰痛;

08:00-24:00 換衫和如廁時, 變態控機賤人控老畜牲和肥賤者同我併感覺性騷擾;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將智障, 文盲, 反應遲鈍者間歇性同我併腦袋影響我書寫和語言能力;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將多人同我身體大小便;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將雙腿僵硬,不能下蹲者同我併感覺精神虐待;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人間歇性將我的嗅覺同身處污穢地方的人掉換。

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將比我實際體重高出60磅鬆弛肥胖者同我併身體影響儀容和健康;

08:00-24:00變態控機賤人將多人同我併口飲食;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將失禁,便溺者同我併感覺性騷擾;

10:00-13:25 戴口罩時,變態控機賤人將呼吸困難,口臭者同我併呼吸精神虐待;

10:00-10:40 當我閱讀時,變態控機賤人遙控電子武器思維干擾;

11:11,17:41 變態腦控賤人遙控電子武器令我1-5級頭痛;

13:25-24:00 變態控機賤人間歇性將”發瘟雞”同我併感覺性騷擾;

14:00-24:00 變態腦控賤人遙控電子武器攻擊我喉嚨,令我咳嗽;

15:07-16:58 變態腦控賤人遙控電子武器令我缺氧式昏睡;

18:15-24:00 變態控機賤人將痰塞者同我併呼吸和感覺,精神虐待;

18:20 沐浴時, 變態控機賤人將2男2肥女同我併感覺性騷擾;

18:38-23:00 變態腦控賤人遙控電子武器令我1-5級頭痛;

19:10-23:00 變態控機賤人將吸毒者同我併呼吸,令我鼻抽搐,精神虐待;

19:29-20:00 變態控機賤人將右腿關節痛者同我併感覺精神虐待;

19:00-23:00 變態逐臭賤人間歇性遙控電子武器攻擊我穴位,令我放屁,空氣污染;

 (因直接和間接併大量芯片原故,體重上昇至約130磅, 我實際體重是70)

 

香港時間2022-01-03(是日法律責任由林鄭特首,鄧炳強局長, 䔥澤頤處長,施永青先生負責

00:00-24:00 變態控機賤人全開我腦音,將多人同我併腦部惡意思維干擾,潛聲誤導聽者;

03:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將鼻塞者同我併呼吸和感覺,精神虐待;

03:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將痰塞者同我併呼吸和感覺,精神虐待;

03:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將多位呼吸道疾病者同我併呼吸,令我呼吸困難精神虐待;

03:00-08:00 變態賤人遙控電子武器攻擊我我腿部穴位,令我雙腿酸痛難忍,沒法伸直;

03:00-08:00 變態腦控賤人遙控電子武器令我半睡半醒,潛聲,潛夢;

03:00-20:00 變態腦控賤人遙控電子武器令我1-7級頭痛;(背後指使者:周星馳,曾志豪,劉玉翠)

03:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將喉嚨痛者同我併感覺精神虐待;

03:00-08:00 變態腦控賤人遙控電子武器攻擊我喉嚨,令我咳嗽;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人間歇性將我的嗅覺同身處污穢地方的人掉換。

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將我換成不同人的樣貌;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將眼睛老化,反光和白內障者同我併眼睛影響儀容和視力模糊;

08:00-24:00 換衫和如廁時, 變態控機賤人控老畜牲和肥賤者同我併感覺性騷擾;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人間歇性將智障, 文盲,反應遲鈍者輪流同我併腦部影響我書寫,語言能力和記憶;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將多人同我併身體大小便;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將多人同我併口部飲食;

08:00-24:00變態控機賤人將麒麟腿者同我併身體影響儀容和精神虐待;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將比我實際體重高出60磅肥胖者同我併身體影響儀容和健康;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將雙腿僵硬,不能下蹲者同我併感覺精神虐待;

08:00-24:00變態控機賤人將糖尿病引起的雙腿痠痛, 沉重者同我併感覺精神虐待;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將失禁者同我併感覺性騷擾;

09:30-16:45 戴口罩時,變態控機賤人將呼吸困難,鼻塞者同我併呼吸精神虐待;

09:30-10:10 當我閱讀時,變態控機賤人遙控電子武器思維干擾;

10:27 變態控機賤人將腎病患者同我併感覺精神虐待;

10:30-11:47變態控機賤人將”尿頻雞”同我併感覺性騷擾;

11:49-23:00 變態控機賤人將”發泡雞”同我併感覺性騷擾;

14:50-24:00 變態控機賤人將左腿關節痛者同我併感覺精神虐待;

15:00-24:00 變態逐臭賤人間歇性遙控電子武器攻擊我穴位,令我放屁,空氣污染;

17:47-24:00 變態腦控賤人遙控電子武器攻擊我腸胃,令我腸胃不適;

19:31-21:00 變態腦控賤人遙控電子武器攻擊我肚臍,令我肚臍痕癢;

18:30 沐浴時, 變態控機賤人將1男1肥女同我併感覺性騷擾;

(因直接和間接併大量芯片原故,體重上昇至約131磅, 我實際體重是70)

 

香港時間2022-01-04(是日法律責任由林鄭特首,鄧炳強局長,䔥澤頤處長,施永青先生負責)

00:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將身處高噪音者同我併聽覺,令我不得安靜。精神虐待;

05:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將呼吸道疾病者同我併感覺,令我呼吸困難精神虐待;

05:00-24:00變態控機賤人將鼻塞者同我併呼吸和感覺,精神虐待;

05:00-08:00 變態賤人遙控電子武器攻擊我我腿部穴位,令我酸痛難忍;

05:00-08:00 變態腦控賤人遙控電子武器令人半睡半醒; 潛聲,潛夢;

05:00-24:00 變態控機賤人遙控電子武器攻擊令我3-7級頭痛;(背後指使者:周潤發,周星馳,黃子華,曾志豪)

05:00-24:00 變態控機賤人遙控電子武器攻擊我喉嚨,令我咳嗽;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將便溺,失禁者同我併感覺性騷擾;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人間歇性將我的嗅覺同身處污穢地方的人掉換。

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人全開我腦音,將多人同我併腦思維干擾,潛聲誤導聽者;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將我換成不同人的樣貌;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將比我實際體重高出60磅肥胖鬆弛者同我併身體影響健康;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將眼睛老化,反光和近視者同我併眼睛影響儀容和視力聚焦;

08:00-24:00 換衫和如廁時, 變態控芯片賤人控老畜牲和肥賤者同我併感覺性騷擾;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將智障, 文盲者間歇性同我併腦袋影響我書寫和語言能力;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將多人同我併身體大小便;

08:00-24:00變態控機賤人將多人同我併口飲食;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將右眼有白內障者同我併視覺,令我眼睛帶有霧霾;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將糖尿病引起的雙腿痠痛, 沉重者同我併感覺精神虐待;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將雙腿僵硬,不能下蹲者同我併感覺精神虐待;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將傷風感冒者同我併感覺精神虐待;

(因直接和間接併大量芯片原故,體重上昇至130磅, 我實際體重是70磅)

 

香港時間2022-01-05(是日法律責任由林鄭特首,鄧炳強局長,䔥澤頤處長,施永青先生負責)

00:00-24:00 變態控機賤人全開我腦音,將多人同我併腦思維干擾,潛聲誤導聽者;

00:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將鼻塞者同我併呼吸和感覺,精神虐待;

00:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將痰塞者同我併呼吸和感覺,精神虐待;

00:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將呼吸道疾病者同我併感覺,令我呼吸困難精神虐待;

00:00-08:00變態腦控賤人遙控電子武器令我半睡半醒,潛聲,潛夢;

00:00-24:00 變態控機賤人間歇性將身處高噪音者同我併聽覺,令我不得安靜。

00:00-24:00 變態控機賤人遙控電子武器攻擊我喉嚨,令我咳嗽;

00:00-24:00 變態控機賤人遙控電子武器攻擊我鼻腔,令我流鼻水:

00:00-08:30 變態控機賤人遙控電子武器攻擊令我3-7級頭痛;(背後指使者:周潤發,周星馳,鄭裕玲,羅啟新)

00:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將傷風感冒者同我併感覺精神虐待;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將比我實際體重高出60磅肥胖鬆弛者同我併身體影響健康;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人間歇性將我的嗅覺同身處污穢地方的人掉換。

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將眼睛老化和近視者同我併眼睛影響儀容和視力聚焦;

08:00-24:00 換衫和如廁時, 變態控芯片賤人控老畜牲和肥賤者同我併感覺性騷擾;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將智障, 文盲者間歇性同我併腦袋影響我書寫和語言能力;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將多人同我併身體大小便;

08:00-24:00變態控機賤人將多人同我併口飲食;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將白內障,眼睛反光者同我併視覺,令我眼睛帶有霧霾;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將雙腿僵硬,不能下蹲者同我併感覺精神虐待;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將糖尿病引起的雙腿痠痛, 沉重者同我併感覺精神虐待;

08:30-24:00 變態控機賤人將失禁,發泡者同我併感覺精神虐待

08:30-24:00 變態控機賤人遙控電子武器攻擊令我1-5級頭痛;(背後指使者:周潤發,周星馳,鄭裕玲,羅啟新)

09:00-21:08 變態控機賤人將”發瘟雞”同我併感覺性騷擾;

09:00-12:00 變態控機賤人遙控電子武器攻擊令我右耳背痛;

10:10-10:30 變態控機賤人將腎病患者同我併感覺,令我眼肚痠痛;

11:59-24:00 變態腦控賤人遙控電子武器攻擊我肚臍,令我肚臍痕癢;

12:00 沐浴時, 變態控機賤人將3男1肥女同我併感覺性騷擾;

20:07-24:00 變態控機賤人將左腿關節痛者同我併感覺精神虐待;

21:04-24:00 變態控機賤人將”發泡雞”同我併感覺性騷擾;

 (因直接和間接併大量芯片原故,體重上昇至約130磅, 我實際體重是70磅)

 

香港時間2022-01-06 (是日法律責任由林鄭特首,鄧炳強局長,䔥澤頤處長,施永青先生負責)

01:00-24:00變態控機賤人全開我腦音, 將多人同我併腦袋思維干擾,潛聲誤導聽者;

01:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將多人同我併身體大小便;

01:00-08:00 變態賤人遙控電子武器攻擊我腿部穴位,令我腿部酸痛難忍,不能伸直;

01:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將呼吸道疾病者同我併呼吸,令我呼吸困難;

01:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將鼻塞者同我併呼吸和感覺,精神虐待;

01:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將痰塞者同我併呼吸和感覺,精神虐待;

01:00-08:00 變態控機賤人遙控電子武器睡眠剥奪;潛聲,潛夢;

01:00-24:00 變態控機賤人間歇性將身處高噪音者同我併聽覺,令我不得安靜。精神虐待;

01:00-24:00 變態控機賤人遙控電子武器攻擊我喉嚨,令我咳嗽;

01:00-24:00 變態控機賤人遙控電子武器攻擊我鼻腔,令我流鼻水:

01:00-16:00 變態控機賤人遙控電子武器攻擊令我1-7級頭痛;(背後指使者:周潤發,周星馳,鄭裕玲,羅啟新)

08:00-10:00 變態控機賤人將左腿關節痛者同我併感覺精神虐待;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人間歇性將我的嗅覺同身處污穢地方的人掉換。

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將雙腿僵硬,不能下蹲者同我併感覺精神虐待;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將糖尿病引起的雙腿痠痛, 沉重者同我併感覺精神虐待;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將比我實際體重高出60磅肥胖鬆弛者同我併身體影響健康;

08:00-24:00 變態控機賤人將多人同我併口飲食;

10:00-12:00 戴口罩時,變態控機賤人將呼吸困難者同我併感覺精神虐待;

10:00-10:30 變態控機賤人遙控電子武器干擾我閱讀;

19:18-22:00 變態腦控賤人間歇性遙控電子武器令我1-5級頭痛;

19:38-17:00 變態控機賤人將左腿關節痛者同我併感覺精神虐待;

18:30 沐浴時, 變態控機賤人將2男1肥女同我併感覺性騷擾;

(因直接和間接併大量芯片原故,體重上昇至約130磅, 我實際體重是70磅)

 

將我每天在腦控空間所發 生的一切有關腦控賤人濫用私刑事件在此披露做為日後警方口供和訴訟依據. 請各方親人及好友, 切不可付款給“腦殘賤人族”, 你的好心將成為“腦殘賤人族”製造更多害人的機會.

 

本人在此再次聲明, 我和我的家人從未索取到任何賠償. 也從未由腦控集團任何人手上取得任何酬勞. 

 

我是被”精神禁錮”, 沒有腦控機, 沒有腦芯片, 沒有屏障器.

 

I write my day in the brain control space as the disclosure statement for the police, and later for court supporting documents.

 

Warn   to   my   relatives and friends, do not pay to the '' perp. sluts '', your kindness will become the ''Perp. Sluts'' to create one more opportunities to hurt me.

 

Here again I declare that I and my family never obtain any compensation and reward from the Perps. In the mind control space up today.

 

I was alone in the mind control space, I have no mind-control machine, no my own brain chip, no blocking device on my hand.

 

腦控控機賤人全週24小時全開我腦音, 潛入他人虛假思維. 挑撥離間,誤導聽者, 當我發出正面思維或指責賤人時, 有人覆蓋我的腦音. 令聽者以為是賤人的聲音. 反之將賤人的負面思維潛我聲, 由我的聲線發出. 

 

全週多人用我的”眼透”跟蹤我.

 

In the whole week, the metamorphosis mind machine controller turn on my brain sound full day,  Imperceptibly to my mind by others with dirty words, issuing false though. Misled the listener.  When I send positive though or accusing perps, it was cover by someone’s brain sound, when the perp send negative though, it throughout from my brain sound. Made listener confused.

 

There are at lease 7 perps in group stalking 24 hours per day.

 

Read more…

 

1. 於26日上午,聽到空間有人提到當天Omicron零感染個案,隨即於26日下午開始,變態控機賤人開始遙控電子武器摧殘我和200萬市民頭痛,於傍晚新聞公布有多名確疹者,其中有一半已經打了疫苗。我有理由相信確疹個案是來自電子武器摧殘造成。而27日零晨,電子武器摧殘加劇,我於27日早上向國安處,警方報案,報案編號:Ref#ERC2112272081044.

 

2. 根據知情者透露,港英政府97年政權移交時,留有一份名單和一大筆賠償金給在腦控空間被腦控的受害者,每人港幣一千萬,但因為大部分受害者都在不知情情況下被腦控,所以也不知道有賠償一事。後來娛樂圈中人得知消息,擁入大批娛樂圈中人混水摸魚。因為有一份賠償名單,當時很多政府公職人員改受害者之名,冒名頂替索取賠償。

 

時至今天,重提此事是意在提醒打算索償的受害者,索取賠償金時記得要求一封政府簽署的賠償信,而賠償信必須蓋章方為有效。因為有受害者之前取賠償金時沒有政府信,被當作洗黑錢之餘,更被逼交出全數。

 

我是在97年之前己被腦控,只知賠償名單被修改,有人以我之名索取了我的賠償,而周星馳提出願意賠償,但沒有政府信。因擔心是黑金,所以我堅持一定要有政府證明文件,證明資金來源合法,所以至今仍未取得賠償。

 

3. 文章刊登前,因其中有關特首的敏感性資訊,被控機賤人阻撓,以換取我和200萬市民十天無頭痛。所以特首的敏感性資訊推遲十天後再行決定是否公告。

Read more…