Mosquito Devices!!
http://ning.it/I0TBsW

Canada: BCCLA calls on School Board to throw out rights violating devices
The B.C. Civil Liberties Association is insisting that the Vancouver School Board remove 33 “Mosquito” noise devices that target children from schools across the city. The devices emit a loud and painful sound frequency only audible to young people, toddlers and babies. They are often used to keep young people away from a particular property, but still permit access to adults.

“These devices have been found by the European Union to be a violation of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child,” said Robert Holmes, Q.C., President of the BCCLA. “A teacher would not be permitted to cause pain or discomfort to a child for punishment; why should our schools be permitted to do the same to deter youth from gathering?”
Read more at link, includes a letter to the Vancouver School Board

CONGRATULATIONS SOLEIMAVIS AND PEACEPINK FOR BEEING RECONISED BY THE JOURNAL OF LAW AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION......CONGRATULATIONS....CONGRATULATIONS...CONGGRATULATIONS......

http://deepthought.newsvine.com/_news/2012/04/22/11308107-can-a-satellite-read-your-thoughts-the-targets-story-part-3?email=html

Attention- Torture- The Funkbildradar Satellite Radar Weapon- Please No To Funkbildrarture- Global Weapon and a weapon of mass destruction dar Sateliten Radarwaffen Actung ! Folter ! Bitte nein Folter- Globale Waffenforshung Menschenversklavung Kornkurrenzmord- Weapons of Mass Destruction- Non Lethal Weapons, Mind Control Weapons, or psychotronic weapons has been listed as weapons of Mass Destruction by UNIDIR-UN http://unidir.org/pdf/ouvrages/pdf-1-92-9045-002-2-en.pdf

http://endthelie.com/2012/04/12/new-microchip-for-smartphones-to-provide-unprecedented-ultra-precise-location-data/#axzz1sfn8xKGm

On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind Invasive Technology

http://blombladivinden.wordpress.com/2012/04/20/carole-smith-is-a-british-psychoanalyst-in-recent-years-she-has-been-openly-critical-of-government-use-of-intrusive-technology-on-non-consenting-citizens-for-the-development-of-methods-of-state-contr/

Inverness child labor cotton mill- USA   How the Irish Became White. New York: Routledge, Chapman & Hall, September 1995. ISBN: 0-415-91384-5    Maybe if on all the Martin Luther King steets you could remind all the racism rising in  America of the fact the Irish were enslaved- and add the name Daniel O'Connell Street to all those streets so as to remind the USA and world that there was a huge labor injustice against Irish and other Immigrants and that child labor laws were non existent- and the abuse of children as slaves was taking place in the USA up until 1920    http://freemanireland.ning.com/profiles/blogs/inverness-child-labor-cotton-mill-usa-how-the-irish-became-white
<br/>

<br/>
A Book:<p>Noel Ignatiev, How the Irish Became White.<br/>
New York: Routledge, Chapman &amp; Hall, September 1995.<br/>
ISBN: 0-415-91384-5</p>
<p>A Review:</p>
<p>The Boston Globe, November 7, 1995<br/>
"The Irish, the Blacks and the Struggle with Racism,"<br/>
by Elijah Wald, Globe Correspondent Reactions of Irish America to the 1841 appeal made to them by Daniel O'Connell, The Liberator, to join with anti-slavery forces in the USA. <a href="http://www.afn.org/~dks/race/wald-ignatiev.html">http://www.afn.org/~dks/race/wald-ignatiev.html</a></p>;

According to the CAT, the State should ensure that its “competent authorities proceed to a prompt and impartial investigation” of any torture allegations.^[6] Similarly, the Istanbul Protocol asserts that the State should appoint a primary investigative authority (separately from providing access to legal services) to serve as the main liaison between the authorities and the alleged torture victim. This investigative authority must be separate from alleged torturers or any agency that employs them. ^[7]In doing so, the State should be sensitive to the victim's culture, language and gender. The investigator should attempt to obtain a detailed statement from the victim, color photographs of the injuries, as well as a thorough medical examination from an independent, qualified expert to produce a comprehensive evaluation of the alleged torture victim. The State should also provide the following information to the alleged torture victim during the investigation:

1. updates on the progress of the investigation; 2. information on all key hearings in the investigation and prosecution of the case; 3. updates on the suspected perpetrator (whether he/she has been identified, arrested etc.); 4. contact information for advocacy and treatment groups that might assist the victim; 5. the right to refuse questioning, to stop the investigation, or to take a break; 6. protection, not only for the victim, but also for the victim's family; 7. psychological counselors and other medical professionals trained in treating torture victims. When using any kind of formal, standardized equipment to conduct medical tests on suspected victims of torture, however doctors must be sensitive to the trauma. In fact, these instruments should only be used when absolutely necessary, such as when there is a legal case against the perpetrator and proof of torture is needed. ^[8]

http://defensewiki.ibj.org/index.php/Representing_Victims_of_Torture?gclid=CKDIt569w68CFQURNAodtk9Ebg#Identifying_Victims_of_Torture

When are we going to end this. It is taking forever. I can't take another day of my electronic harassment. Each day feels worse than the other. I am being tortured like hell with the mind reading and the voice to skull. Does anybody know if Greg or anybody else is ready to get this electronic harassment lawsuit going? I'm sorry, but it is really a nightmare having to wake up everyday putting up with this stuff.

International Criminal Court and the Protection of Witnesses and Victims of torture Globally- "The Rome Statute" rome_statute(e).pdf, 1 MB

Rome Statute of the
International Criminal Court*
* Text of the Rome Statute circulated as document A/CONF.183/9 of 17 July 1998 and corrected by procès-verbaux of 10 November
1998, 12 July 1999, 30 November 1999, 8 May 2000, 17 January 2001 and 16 January 2002. The Statute entered into force on 1 July
2002.

Article 1
The Court
An International Criminal Court (“the Court”) is hereby established. It shall be a

permanent institution and shall have the power to exercise its jurisdiction over persons for the
most serious crimes of international concern, as referred to in this Statute, and shall be
complementary to national criminal jurisdictions. The jurisdiction and functioning of the Court
shall be governed by the provisions of this Statute. Article 2
Relationship of the Court with the United Nations
The Court shall be brought into relationship with the United Nations through an agreement
to be approved by the Assembly of States Parties to this Statute and thereafter concluded by the
President of the Court on its behalf.
Article 3

Seat of the Court
1. The seat of the Court shall be established at The Hague in the Netherlands (“the host
State”).
2. The Court shall enter into a headquarters agreement with the host State, to be approved by
the Assembly of States Parties and thereafter concluded by the President of the Court on its behalf.
3. The Court may sit elsewhere, whenever it considers it desirable, as provided in this
Statute.
Article 4
Legal status and powers of the Court

1. The Court shall have international legal personality. It shall also have such legal capacity
as may be necessary for the exercise of its functions and the fulfilment of its purposes.
2. The Court may exercise its functions and powers, as provided in this Statute, on the
territory of any State Party and, by special agreement, on the territory of any other State.
PART 2. JURISDICTION, ADMISSIBILITY AND APPLICABLE LAW
Article 5
Crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court
1. The jurisdiction of the Court shall be limited to the most serious crimes of concern to the
international community as a whole. The Court has jurisdiction in accordance with this Statute

with respect to the following crimes:
(a) The crime of genocide;
(b) Crimes against humanity;
(c) War crimes;
(d) The crime of aggression.
2. The Court shall exercise jurisdiction over the crime of aggression once a provision is
adopted in accordance with articles 121 and 123 defining the crime and setting out the conditions
under which the Court shall exercise jurisdiction with respect to this crime. Such a provision shall
be consistent with the relevant provisions of the Charter of the United Nations.

Article 6
Genocide
For the purpose of this Statute, “genocide” means any of the following acts committed
with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its
physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Article 7
Crimes against humanity
1. For the purpose of this Statute, “crime against humanity” means any of the following acts
when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian
population, with knowledge of the attack:
(a) Murder;
(b) Extermination;
(c) Enslavement;

(d) Deportation or forcible transfer of population;
(e) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of
fundamental rules of international law;
(f) Torture;
(g) Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced
sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity;
(h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial,
national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are
universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act

referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court;
(i) Enforced disappearance of persons;
(j) The crime of apartheid;
(k) Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or
serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.
2. For the purpose of paragraph 1:
(a) “Attack directed against any civilian population” means a course of conduct
involving the multiple commission of acts referred to in paragraph 1 against any civilian
population, pursuant to or in furtherance of a State or organizational policy to commit such attack;

(b) “Extermination” includes the intentional infliction of conditions of life, inter alia
the deprivation of access to food and medicine, calculated to bring about the destruction of part of
a population;
(c) “Enslavement” means the exercise of any or all of the powers attaching to the right
of ownership over a person and includes the exercise of such power in the course of trafficking in
persons, in particular women and children;
(d) “Deportation or forcible transfer of population” means forced displacement of the
persons concerned by expulsion or other coercive acts from the area in which they are lawfully
present, without grounds permitted under international law;

(e) “Torture” means the intentional infliction of severe pain or suffering, whether
physical or mental, upon a person in the custody or under the control of the accused; except that
torture shall not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to, lawful
sanctions;
(f) “Forced pregnancy” means the unlawful confinement of a woman forcibly made
pregnant, with the intent of affecting the ethnic composition of any population or carrying out
other grave violations of international law. This definition shall not in any way be interpreted as
affecting national laws relating to pregnancy;
(g) “Persecution” means the intentional and severe deprivation of fundamental rights

contrary to international law by reason of the identity of the group or collectivity;
(h) “The crime of apartheid” means inhumane acts of a character similar to those
referred to in paragraph 1, committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic
oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and
committed with the intention of maintaining that regime;
(i) “Enforced disappearance of persons” means the arrest, detention or abduction of
persons by, or with the authorization, support or acquiescence of, a State or a political
organization, followed by a refusal to acknowledge that deprivation of freedom or to give
information on the fate or whereabouts of those persons, with the intention of removing them

from the protection of the law for a prolonged period of time.
3. For the purpose of this Statute, it is understood that the term “gender” refers to the two
sexes, male and female, within the context of society. The term “gender” does not indicate any
meaning different from the above.
Article 8
War crimes
1. The Court shall have jurisdiction in respect of war crimes in particular when committed as
part of a plan or policy or as part of a large-scale commission of such crimes.
2. For the purpose of this Statute, “war crimes” means:

(a) Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely, any of the
following acts against persons or property protected under the provisions of the relevant Geneva
Convention:
(i) Wilful killing;
(ii) Torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments;
(iii) Wilfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health;
(iv) Extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by
military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly;
(v) Compelling a prisoner of war or other protected person to serve in the

forces of a hostile Power;
(vi) Wilfully depriving a prisoner of war or other protected person of the rights
of fair and regular trial;

我是一名居住在北京丰台区方庄街道的脑控受害者，已经被困在“卫星监狱”里一年多了，之前，一直被脑控武器欺骗着在北京生活。秘密使用卫星微波脑控武器的美国人使我失业、想方设法脑控周围的人，和我有对立的思想，让我的生活遇到不少麻烦。现在，我无法再就业、家庭收入越来越少。打仗的美国人的目的是让北京出现很穷的百姓家庭，让中国国内社会不稳定、利用有反对中国政府思想的中国百姓颠覆中国政府。整个中国已经被美国的卫星武器秘密地全部控制、作战了很多年。北京的皇家园林文物保护公园被卫星激光武器进攻过，琉璃瓦坏得很利害；各种卫星微波武器中的气象战武器在北京已经投入使用，去年我在雷阵雨中，看到过人造的雷和闪电，我用DV拍下来了；全中国有越来越多的人违法；政府里的人被意识欺骗着出错；法庭里的法官经常出现错误的主观思想，叛不好案子；欺骗进出口公司的人签订单，欺骗中国人廉价加工制造、出口；骗着中国国家领导人开放更多的领域，老外通过和民营企业合资进入中国的各行各业，把值钱的中国商品越来越多的出口；老外在中国从服装、食品等很多领域高价地挣钱；中国的周边国家非法入侵中国的领土、领海，并设法在法庭上使之合法化等等。

我是从2006年冬天在加拿大卡尔加里市被跟踪，后来脑袋里被穿入"voice to skull"的脑控武器的受害者，经常生病，很痛苦。前几天我又生病了，上吐、下泄，去医院看病，化验结果是：肠胃功能紊乱。后来，吃了一些药，一天后见好。上吐、下泄的病我已经得过三、四回了。我的经验是，如果脑控受害者得了这种病，可以尽量喝一些糖水等补充营养，到医院看病，吃药，治治看看。

在这里，和大家分享我的经历，希望对有同样经历的美国卫星微波脑控武器的受害者看病、留证据有帮助。

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/if_chapter8.htm

Few days ago, I went out often and when I came back, I saw the 19 years old guy was with many friends drinking. Later, I found out he was going to his room with a woman. I heard some voices from the hallway. I suddenly needed to go to bathroom and left my room. On the hallway I met a man and we chatted as he offered me some drink for the gathering. They often have party in weekends. I saw him and the girl leaving the house. It was last Sunday.

On Monday, I saw him with some others in the kitchen. But when I came back around the dinner time, they left and he seemed to be in his room alone.

Yesterday was the same. He seemed to be in his room alone. It's just strange as normally he goes out in afternoon and sometimes he doesn't come back till late night around 3am or something.

Then today, he was still in his room whole day and I could hear no noise. I saw his room door open though. At night, his half-Japanese friend seemed to come and they had dinner together.

Something seemed to be changed. I don't know what happened. So far, I did not see him today even we stay in the same house. I saw him in the kitchen around the dinner time though. I wonder what happened here.

Also, I found my underwear separately washed in the laundry today. I put my underwear and socks together in a washing net and somehow I found one of them in different place. And when I went out, I found an underwear sticked to my windbreaker. I don't think it stacked naturally, but it was a bit strange to find something like this happening. I bought new underwears since V2K perps last week saying the 19-year old boy used the old ones for masturbation. For the laundry, I just kept the new ones in a separate bag in another spot but one of them was stacked on my jacket. Anyone could enter my room while I was working with the laundry and hanging them for drying.

Last time I saw one of them got hole on the side. And now is something like this.

http://thebulletin.org/web-edition/op-eds/outlaw-nonconsensual-human-experiments-now   Outlaw nonconsensual human experiments now

By Cheryl Welsh | 16 June 2009

About 15 years ago, a reporter at the Albuquerque Tribune discovered evidence that during the Cold War, the U.S. government carried out radiation experiments on U.S. citizens without their knowledge or consent, all under the shadow of classified research. When the story hit the newswires, the U.S. public was outraged. President Bill Clinton responded by establishing the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments (ACHRE), calling on it to review Washington's past actions and recommend steps that would prevent such heinous human experiments from ever taking place again.

http://thebulletin.org/web-edition/op-eds/outlaw-nonconsensual-human-experiments-now  They already are ILLEGAL and hence outlawed- This law would ...not exist if the weapons did not exist- TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 113B > §2332h
§ 2332h. Radiological dispersal devices
(3) Special circumstances.— If the death of another results from a person’s violation of subsection (a), the person shall be fined not more than $2,000,000 and punished by imprisonment for life.- Star wars and HAARP... are in In violation of US Federal Public Law- Pub. L. No. 85-568, 72 Stat. 426-438 (Jul. 29, 1958)
http://history.nasa.gov/spaceact-legishistory.pdf If you watch one documentary from the Scientists and military personal... that warned us of weather weapons, ELF waves, plate techtonic earthquake radiation and the threat of global mind control with supercomputers- watch this- This law would ...not exist if the weapons did not exist- TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 113B > §2332h
§ 2332h. Radiological dispersal devices
(3) Special circumstances.— If the death of another results from a person’s violation of subsection (a), the person shall be fined not more than $2,000,000 and punished by imprisonment for life. Weapons of Mass Destruction- Non Lethal Weapons, Mind Control Weapons, or psychotronic weapons has been listed as weapons of Mass Destruction by UNIDIR-UN http://unidir.org/pdf/ouvrages/pdf-1-92-9045-002-2-en.pdf

..... In 1969 Dr Jose Delgado, a Yale psychologist, published a book: “Physical Control of the Mind: Towards a Psychocivilized Society”. In essence, he displayed in practical demonstrations how, by means of electrical stimulation of the brain which had been mapped out in its relations between different points and activities, functions and sensations, - by means of electrical stimulation, how the rhythm of breathing and heartbeat could be changed, as well as the function of most of the viscera, and gall bladder secretion. Frowning, opening and closing of eyes and mouth, chewing, yawning, sleep, dizziness, epileptic seizures in healthy persons were induced. The intensity of feelings could be controlled by turning the knob, which controlled the intensity of the electric current. He states at the end of his book the hope that the new power will remain limited to scientists or some charitable elite for the benefit of a “psychocivilized society.”

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7123#.T43ovuYKZUk.wordpress

Dear Human Rights Watch:

CC: To whom it may concern

Please pay close attention to Amnesty International “ Briefing to UN Committee Against Torture, Canada” . Here is the copy of my letter to AI. Thank you very much.

Best regards,

Robin yan

Dear Amnesty International:

On behalf of myself, thank you for your “ Briefing to UN Committee Against Torture, Canada”  

http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/AMR20/004/2012/en

http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/AMR20/004/2012/en/b46d9371-1b2c-414b-90e9-b97c3953cb48/amr200042012en.pdf ( Torture with Non Lethal Weapons, Page 30)

Here are two videos below to support your statement regarding torture with Non Lethal Weapons in Canada. Please read the explanations under these two videos. Thank you again.

Video 1:

First response to the Government of Canada after our tabled petition for a public inquiry into acts of torture with Non Lethal weapons ( mind control weapons)  was refused. The House of Commons of Canada stated: "The Government  has no information on any such activities."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3QpbrnCiAQ&feature=channel&list=UL

Video 2:

Torture and Crimes Against Humanity with Non Lethal Weapons, Heart Attack Guns, Noise Weapons

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQo5sFwkpfo&feature=channel&list=UL

Best regards,

Robin yan

IEC@amnesty.org

secgen@amnesty.org

irene.khan@amnesty.org

US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights Violations and Continuing Research in Electromagnetic Weapons- 2006 Very Important PDF from Sanoma University in California By Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton. You will have to hit save as once the PDF is open and print from a pdf application this 48 page document US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights Violations and Continuing Research in Electromagnetic Weapons- 2006 Please download and print the entire document. It has all information of the chemtrials, weather modification, directed energy as well as the projects Tesla worked on in 1908 inside the USA- such as moving the earth distance from the sun to change climate.