part 2
20. SUMMARY REPORT OF MY MEETING WITH THE LAWYERS IN PARIS
September 13, 2008 by Rudy Andria rudyrud2004@gmail.com
Only 3 lawyers turned up, the other 3 were held up at their offices at the last moment and briefly chatted with us on the phone.
1.They all know about the existence of various technological means which violate the fundamental human rights of innocent people , they know the existence of non lethal weapons and of highly sophisticated psychological pressures.
2.They do not have the slightest doubt about some governments' participation in influencing or even destroying the free will of some people.
3.They know that the exposure of such practices usually provokes sniggering and those who dare to complain are either made fun of or accused of paranoia.
Paranoia , of course, does exist and as it is characterized by an excessive mistrust of other people's acts or an excessive mistrust of power, it affects every social relationship and makes it possible to justify exclusion .
4.Utmost rigour and precision are therefore required when exposing the attacks on the victims' integrity, privacy and freedom of thought by invisible means. .
It is only by building up impeccable fact-files supported by official reports and scientific studies that public opinion worldwide can be sensitized and made aware of the problem.
It is only under these conditions of rigour and precision that the 3 lawyers present will agree to put the case for the defence.
The 3 lawyers all agreed on the following points:
Our difficulty is that we have practically no legal evidence of the attacks, so we have to make do with:
a) statistics
b) similarities in symptoms and experiences
c) similarities of torture cases
d) existence of weapons'patents
e) existence of the technology patents for the use of V2K
f) complicity of a number of psychiatrists worldwide
G) the highly probable involvement of many governments ( two lawyers referred to the example of helicopters and said that not many people can afford to maintain aircrafts. Flights are logged and the airspace they are in is recorded).
Rudy Andria
September 13, 2008
I've forgotten to add 1 point: the 3 lawyers think that our first help should come from the parliamentarians, because they are the ones who make the laws.
21. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT – The Office of the Prosecutor
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT – The Office of the Prosecutor
Our Reference: OTP-CR-70/07
The Hague, Monday, 29 September 2008
Dear Sir/Madam
On behalf of the Prosecutor, I thank you for your communication received 21/2/2007, as well as any subsequent related information.
As you may know, the International Criminal Court (“the ICC” or “the Court”) is governed by the Rome Statute, which entrusts the court with a very specific and carefully defined jurisdiction and mandate. A fundamental feature of the Rome Statute is that the Court may only exercise jurisdiction over persons for the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole, namely genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, as defined in the Rome Statute (Articles 6 to 8). The Court may only exercise jurisdiction over crimes committed on or after 1 July 2002 (Article 11). In addition, the Court may only exercise jurisdiction over crimes committed on the territory of a State that has accepted the jurisdiction of the Court or by a national of such a State (Article 12), or where the Security Council refers the situation to the Court 9Article 13).
Accordingly, I regret to advise you that your communication appears to relate to matters outside the jurisdiction of the Court. The Prosecutor has therefore confirmed that there is not a basis at this time to proceed with further analysis. The information you have submitted will be maintained in our archives, and the decision not to proceed may be reconsidered if new facts or evidence provide a reasonable basis to believe that a crime the jurisdiction of the Court has been committed.
I hope you will appreciate that with the defined jurisdiction of the Court, many serious allegations will be beyond the reach of this institution to address, I note in this regard that the ICC is designed to complement, not replace national jurisdictions. Thus, if you wish to pursue this matter further, you may consider raising it with other appropriate national or international authorities.
I am grateful for your interest in the ICC. If you would like to learn more about the work of the ICC, I invite you to visit our website at www.icc-cpi.int .
John Finch
5/8 Kemp Street, Thornbury, Vic, 3071, Australia
Yours sincerely
{signature}
M.P. Dillon
Head of the Information & Evidence Unit
Office of the Prosecutor
Post Office Box 19519, 2500 CM The Hague, The Netherlands
TEL: 31-70-5158515 FAX: 31-70-5158555 http://www.icc-cpi.int
22. 2nd LETTER FROM REPRESENTATIVE JIM GUEST - 8/10/08
http://www.msnusers.com/JAMESWALBERTFILE/shoebox.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=10
JIM GUEST STATE REPRESENTATIVE MISSOURI
DISTRICT ADDRESS
P.O. BOX 412, KING CITY, MO 64463
Tel: 660-535-6664
To Whom It May Concern:
I have worked for 3 years with Microwave and Electronic Harassment victims throughout the US and overseas. It is hard for others to understand the technology that is being used to destroy people’s lives. I know James because he contacted me for help. James has worked to find proof of what has happened to him.
Many victims try hard to get help from professional doctors to help find devices such as Veri-Chip. I would request that you and those who can make a difference would help James and others to find answers.
5th District State Representative
23..THE TAOISEACH OF IRELAND - 8/10/08
Dear Mr. Finch,
I wish to acknowledge receipt of your e-mail of 3 October 2008 which will be brought to the Taoiseach's attention as soon as possible.
Yours sincerely,
David King
Assistant Private Secretary to the Taoiseach
Telephone: 01-6194020
E-mail: privateoffice@taoiseach.gov.ie , Claire.HayesCurtin@taoiseach.gov.ie , itu@taoiseach.gov.ie
The Department of the Taoiseach is committed to providing a professional, efficient and courteous service to all our customers. To view the Customer Charter, please click on
http://www.taoiseach.gov.ie/index.asp?1ocID=181&docID=1762
23. MR NIGEL FARRAGE, MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, from UKIP ( United Kingdom Independence and Democracy Party), BRUSSELS, EUROPE 30/1/09
Dear Mr Finch
Thank you for this account of your hideous experiences and the technology, which might have been used to occasion them.
The UK Independence Party is supporting the initiative, by Dr Walter Madlinger, to demonstrate such matters to an expert audience, at the Ettlingen Conference on Non-Lethal Weapons, on 11th May, this year, and I would encourage you to attend, if you are not already planning to do so.
Yours sincerely
Andrew S. Reed
(Office of Nigel Farage, Brussels)
EMAIL: nigel.farage@europarl.europa.eu
24. MR ANTHONY ROMERO, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ACLU, 13/2/09
Dear John,
Thank you for speaking out against the abuse of the "state secrets" doctrine. We know your time is limited, and we appreciate your efforts to protect civil liberties.
The ACLU works daily in courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and laws of the United States guarantee everyone in this country. We need your support now more than ever as we work to restore liberties lost over the last eight years. If you have a moment, please make a donation today. Visit www.aclu.org/donate.
Thanks again for taking action. We'll keep you up-to-date on this important legislation.
Sincerely,
Anthony D. Romero
Executive Director, ACLU
Executive_Director@aclu.org
25. MR NIKIFOROUS DIAMANDOUROS, THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN, 28/5/09
S2009-104176
STRASBOURG 8/5/09
COMPLAINT NUMBER: 1568/2006/(AVM)OV
Dear Sir (Mr John Finch)
I am writing in reply of your email of 9 April 2009 in which you come back on your earlier complaint 1568/2006/(AVM)OV.
You allege that some extreme and horrendous criminality is being conducted by agencies related to the US government with the complicity of many other government and security agencies. You state that victims as you are being subjected to torture and mental and physical destruction and that this has remained completely unreported. You state that, more particularly, you are being completely mutilated and neutralised by electro-magnetic radiation and that you are “brain-broadcasted”.
As I already informed you in my letters of 22 June and 14 September 2006, I have unfortunately no power to intervene in this matter, because your allegations are not directed against a European Union institution or body.
However given that you are residing in Australia, I would like to repeat my earlier advice that, in case you have an allegation against an Australian government agency, you might consider contacting the Australian Ombudsman:
Commonwealth Ombudsman
National Office
GPO Box 442, Canberra ACT 2601
Ground Floor, I Farrell Place
Canberra City ACT 2600
http://www.comb.gov.au
ombudsman@ombudsman.gov.au
I regret I cannot be of further assistance.
Yours sincerely,
P. Nikiforos DIAMANDOROUS
The European Ombudsman
1 Ave President Robert Schumann – CS 30403 – F-67001 strasbourg Cedex
TEL: 33 (0)3.88.172313 – fax: 33 (0)3.88.179062
http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu – eo@ombudsman.europa.eu
26. THE PREMIER OF NSW, AUSTRALIA, 6/8/09
EA1470971 – HSJB
Dear Mr Finch
The Premier has received your recent email concerning your reported experiences in Russia, Turkey and China.
As the subject you have raised primarily relates to areas of Australian Government responsibility, Mr Rees is unable to be of direct assistance.
Accordingly, the opportunity has been taken to bring the terms of your approach to the attention of the Australian Government.
Yours sincerely
Emanuel Sklavounos
for Director General
27. PROF. DR. ADRIAN EUGEN HOLLAENDER, CENTER OF LEGAL RESEARCH, UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA, 11/8/09
CENTER OF LEGAL RESEARCH,
Prof. Dr. Adrian Eugen Hollaender,
Chairman of The Austrian Fundamental Rights Conference,
Human Rights Seminar Instructor at the University of Vienna
Dear Mr. Finch:
With great concern, I have read your complaint about ENERGY AND NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONS TORTURE, DEGRADATION AND MUTILATION CASE.
If you wish, I could examine the case under the legal perspective and write a legal expertise on it that you can use in the complaint procedures.
Sincerely,
Prof. Hollaender
Email: calix.hollaender@chello.at
28. MR NIKIFOROUS DIAMANDOUROS, THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN, 11/9/09
S2009-104176
STRASBOURG 8/5/09
COMPLAINT NUMBER: 1568/2006/(AVM)OV
Dear Sir (Mr John Finch)
I am writing in reply to your emails of 10, 11, 17 and 18 August 2009 in which you come back on your earlier complaint 1568/2006/(AVM)OV concerning your “directed energy and neurological weapons torture, degradation and mutilation case” you also sent me a “list of the crimes committed by the NWO criminals”.
As I already informed you in my letters 22 June and 14 September 2006, and 8 May 2009, I unfortunately have no power to intervene in this matter.
I regret that I cannot be of further assistance to you in this case
Yours sincerely,
P. Nikiforos DIAMANDOROUS
The European Ombudsman
1 Ave President Robert Schumann – CS 30403 – F-67001 strasbourg Cedex
TEL: 33 (0)3.88.172313 – fax: 33 (0)3.88.179062
http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu – eo@ombudsman.europa.eu
29. MR MARTIN FERGUSON, MEMBER OF AUSTRALIAN PARLIAMENT, 7/1/10
REF: MF/MK (2010/01/07)
Dear Mr Finch
Further to our recent meeting, I have written to the Attorney General, Robert McClelland requesting that your suspicion about constant monitoring of your life by ASIO and the Australian Federal Police be investigated.
You will be advised of any response I receive from the Attorney General.
Best wishes for 2010
Yours sincerely
MARTIN FERGUSON AM MP
Federal Member for Batman, Minister for Resource and Energy, Minister for Tourism
www.martinferguson.com.au
30. MR IAN CARNELL, INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY, OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY, AUSTRALIA, 24/3/10
Correspondence reference: 2010/505
File reference: 2009/62
24 March 2010
Mr John Finch, tijohnfinch@gmail.com
Dear Mr Finch
Thank you for your email of 16 March 2010 asking for protection from surveillance, torture and abuse. I have read your email and note that you believe you are being tortured and abused by ‘directed energy and neuroligical weapons’ by United States government agencies with the complicity of other governments and security agencies.
Before responding to your specific concerns, it is appropriate that I inform you a little about the role and functions of my office.
The Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS) has general oversight responsibilities for each of the six Australian intelligence agencies. The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) is Australia’s domestic security agency and is therefore the Australian intelligence agency most likely to have interaction with Australian persons. The focus of ASIO’s work is on countering terrorism, discouraging people who may act violently for political reasons, and discouraging people who seek to clandestinely obtain sensitive government information or otherwise harm Australia’s interests in order to further their own causes or the interests of foreign governments.
Other ASIO functions include collecting foreign intelligence within Australia, and providing security assessments and protective security advice.
Based on my experience as IGIS for nearly six years, I can assure you that neither ASIO nor any agency within the Australian Intelligence Community (AIC) has the resources, motivation or legal authority to harm individuals in the way you describe.
I am confident in making this assertion because ASIO and the other AIC agencies are each subjected to intensive and frequent review by this office, to ensure that they conduct their business within the bounds of the law, and in a professional and ethical manner. I can also assure you that the inspection regime undertaken by my office is very thorough.
You have also raised the possibility that a foreign intelligence service might be involved in the activities you described. ASIO has a functional interest in monitoring any such activity, and in turn my office closely examines ASIO’s activities in this area. On the basis of the material available to me, I do not believe that they are negligent in this regard.
I should also tell you that I do not have any jurisdiction over any foreign intelligence services, but despite this would regard it as highly improbable that they would target any member of the Australian public who is simply going about their ordinary business.
While I don’t doubt that you have experienced a range of issues that are of concern to you, none of the AIC agencies have the capabilities or motivation to do what you describe.
If you believe you have been the subject of a crime, you have the option of discussing this with your local police.
While my office is unable to directly assist you, I nonetheless hope that the above information is both helpful and reassuring to you.
On behalf of
Ian Carnell, Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security
Office of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security
P +61 2 6271 5692 | F +61 2 6271 5696 | www.igis.gov.au
31. EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN, PETER BONNOR HEAD OF REGISTRY, 13/3/12
EO@ombudsman.europa.eu
zuzana.vanickova@ombudsman.europa.eu
Directorate A Registry
13/3/12
COMPLAINT O497/2012/MF
Dear Mr Finch
I am writing in reply to your email of 1st March in which you complained about alleged acts of torture by electronic weapons and mutilations on certain people ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Having concluded that your complaint is outside the European Ombudsman’s mandate, I wish you every success in finding a positive outcome to the matter you raised in your complaint.
Yours Sincerely
Peter Bonnor
Head of Registry
European Ombudsman
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Euro-Ombudsman <EO@ombudsman.europa.eu> wrote:
Dear Mr Murray,
I am writing in reply to your e-mail of 19 April 2012 in which you asked for help in your matter concerning among others mind control.
I would like to inform you that the role of the European Ombudsman is to investigate complaints alleging maladministration in the activities of the European institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, such as the European Commission and the European Parliament. No action by any other authority or person may be the subject of a complaint to the Ombudsman. Only EU citizens or residents in the territory of the Union may lodge a complaint with the European Ombudsman (Art. 2 (2) of the Statute of the European Ombudsman.
From the above also follows that the Ombudsman is not in a position to help you in your matter, since it does not fall within his mandate.
I hope this information suits you well.
Best regards,
European Ombudsman
Zuzana Vaníčková
T. +33 (0)3 88 17 23 28
zuzana.vanickova@ombudsman.europa.eu
1 avenue du Président Robert Schuman, CS 30403, F - 67001 Strasbourg Cedex
T. + 33 (0)3 88 17 23 13
F. + 33 (0)3 88 17 90 62
www.ombudsman.europa.eu
From: joe murray [mailto:democracynotfascism@gmail.com]
Sent: 26 April 2012 03:27
To: Euro-Ombudsman
Subject: Re: Please help us to get this electronic torture, abuse and experimentation stopped
thanks - I'm an EU (UK) citizen and I'm complaining about maladministration in the EU Instititutions and Agencies that are supposed to protect us from these tortures and abuses.
For example the ECHR and EUROPOL.
sincerely
john finch
From: Euro-Ombudsman <EO@ombudsman.europa.eu>
Date: Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:39 PM
Subject: RE: Please help us to get this electronic torture, abuse and experimentation stopped
To: joe murray <democracynotfascism@gmail.com>
Dear Mr Finch,
Thank you for your further e-mail. From the information provided, it is not clear what are exactly your allegation(s) and claim(s) and against which institutions you wish to complaint against.
I would like to reiterate in this regards that complaint concerning ECHR is outside the Ombudsman's remit. Please note, in this regard, that the European Court of Human Rights was established by the European Convention on Human Rights, signed by the Member States of the Council of Europe. The European Court of Human Rights was not created by or under the EU Treaties and, consequently, it is not a European Union institution, body, office or agency. The European Ombudsman is therefore not entitled to deal with complaints against the European Court of Human Rights.
Should you nevertheless wish to complain to the Ombudsman, you are free to do so. However, please note that the complaint shall be made within two years of the date on which the facts on which it is based came to the attention of the person lodging the complaint and must be preceded by the appropriate administrative approaches to the institutions and bodies concerned (Art. 2 (4) of the Statute of the European Ombudsman). Moreover, the facts of the complaint must not be, or have been, subject to judicial proceedings (Art. 1 (3) of the Statute of the European Ombudsman).
If these criteria are fulfilled and you wish to complain against an EU institution, you could consider using the form for complaints, available on the Ombudsman's website:
http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/atyourservice/home.faces
I hope you will find this information useful.
European Ombudsman
Zuzana Vaníčková
T. +33 (0)3 88 17 23 28
zuzana.vanickova@ombudsman.europa.eu
1 avenue du Président Robert Schuman, CS 30403, F - 67001 Strasbourg Cedex
T. + 33 (0)3 88 17 23 13
F. + 33 (0)3 88 17 90 62
www.ombudsman.europa.eu
32. The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), KRISTINA BORROR, DIRECTOR, 25/4/12
Kristina.Borror@hhs.gov
Borror, Kristina C (HHS/OASH)
25 April 2012 03:50
Dear Mr. Child
The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) has received your June 28, 2011, January 15, and April 18, 2012 emails regarding electronic torture, abuse and experimentation.
OHRP has responsibility for oversight of compliance with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) regulations for the protection of human research subjects (see 45 CFR Part 46 at http://www.dhhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm). In carrying out this responsibility, OHRP evaluates, at OHRP’s discretion, substantive allegations of noncompliance involving human subject research projects conducted or supported by HHS or that are otherwise subject to the regulations (see OHRP memorandum dated October 14, 2009 at http://www.dhhs.gov/ohrp/compliance/ohrpcomp.pdf for an explanation of OHRP’s jurisdiction).
OHRP has jurisdiction only if the allegations involve human subject research (a) conducted or supported by HHS, or (b) conducted at an institution holding an applicable Assurance of Compliance with the HHS regulations.
Neither of these conditions appear to be met by the circumstances described in your letter. Therefore, OHRP will not be able to pursue the matter on your behalf.
OHRP appreciates your concern about the protection of human research subjects.
Sincerely,
Kristina C. Borror, Ph.D.
Director, Division of Compliance Oversight
33. AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL, 5/7/12
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 9:21 PM, <amnestyis@amnesty.org> wrote:
Dear John,
Many thanks for your email.
We regret to inform you that Amnesty International is unable to offer you any assistance as your case does not fall within our areas of work.
We do understand your concerns and desire that action be taken. However, our work is determined by the framework established by Amnesty International members at a global level, and all individual cases that we work on must fall within the terms established by our statute. This does not mean that we consider certain types of human rights, or human rights abuses, to be more important than others. Nor does it mean that we have reached any conclusion as to whether you may have been the victim of a human rights violation. Rather, it means that we must, to be as effective as possible, channel our limited resources towards those areas of work which we have identified as priorities.
We regret that we are unable to assist you, and we do understand the disappointment this must cause. However, we hope you are able to understand the reasons behind this. We do hope that you are able to find the help that you need elsewhere, and that your situation improves.
If you wish to check which kinds of cases Amnesty International can deal with, please check our web page locatedat:
http://www.amnesty.org/en/who-we-are
Sorry we are not able to be of further assistance in this matter.
Regards,
The Communications Team.
From: tijohnfinch@gmail.com
To: amnestyis@amnesty.org
Date: 05/07/2012 04:58
Subject: [Website: contact us] electronic torture,abuse and experimentation
Sent by: webmaster@amnesty.org,
34. EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, COMMITTEE ON PETITIONS, 24/8/12
Erminia Mazzoni
Chairman, Committee on Petitions
European Parliament
B-1047 Brussels
tel: 32 2 2842111
fax: 32 2 2846844
PETITION NUMBER: 0392/2012
I acknowledge the receipt of your recent correspondence dated 14/6/12 to the Committee on Petitions.
This will be added to the file of Mr Babacek on alleged use of mind control systems in the EU
(they then included this copy of the letter sent to Mr Mojmir Babacek on 19/7/12)
Dear Mr Babacek
Thank you for having submitted your petition to the European Parliament for its consideration. It was examined in order to assess whether the issue which you raise, falls clearly within the fields of activity of the European Union for which we are competent.
Unfortunately, I have to inform you that this was not the case, and I am therefore obliged to file your request without being able to take matters any further, pursuant to Article 201 (8) of our Rules of Procedure.
yours sincerely
Erminia Mazzoni
Chairman
Committee on Petitions
35. THE BILL OF RIGHTS DEFENSE COMMITTEE, 18/9/12
from: Bill of Rights Defense Committee bordc@mail.democracyinaction.org, info@bordc.org,
to: john finch tijohnfinch@gmail.org
date: Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7.23am
Re: TO THE BILL OF RIGHTS DEFENSE COMMITTEE – We are a group of over 1300 electronic torture, abuse and experimentation victims – please assist us
Dear John,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
The Bill of Rights Defense Committee advocates and organizes grassroots support for constitutional rights based on the facts reported by national media. We simply don't have the resources to do investigative journalism.
Therefore, BORDC has no institutional position on whether mind control is happening. We take the facts as they're reported, and build a grassroots response.
Wishing all of you the very best,
Barbara
---
Barbara Haugen, Administrator
Bill of Rights Defense Committee
8 Bridge Street, Suite A
Northampton, MA 01060
413-582-0110
www.bordc.org
36. INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF RED CROSS AND RED CRESCENT SOCIETIES, 26/9/12
from: International Federation Secretariat secretariat@ifrc.org
to: john finch <tijohnfinch@gmail.com
date: Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:34 PM
subject: RE: TO THE RED CROSS AND RED CRESCENT - MY ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE, TORTURE, ABUSE AND EXPERIMENTATION CASE SUMMARY
mailed by: ifrc.org
Sir/Madam,
Your email has reached the International Federation based in Geneva, Switzerland.
Your message has been received and read with concern. Although we would like to help, we regret to inform you that the Secretariat of the International Federation is not in a position to assist you on this matter.
For your information, the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies is a federation of National Societies which works to improve the lives of vulnerable people by mobilizing the power of humanity. For doing this, it operates through and in agreement with National Societies and does not respond to individuals for personal assistance.
We suggest, therefore, that you contact the National Society based in your country and submit your request for support directly to them. Contact addresses can be found on our web site in the "directory" section. http://www.ifrc.org/address/directory.asp
We hope that you can find the support you need and wish you all the best.
Regards,
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies
37. ACLU - THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, OREGON, 29/9/12
ACLU – American Civil Liberties Union
PO Box 40585, Portland, Oregon, 97240
(503) 227 3186 www. aclu-or.org
September 28, 2012
John Finch
tijohnfinch@gmail.com
Dear Mr Finch
Thank you for contacting the American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon. As you may know, the ACLU of Oregon is a small, private, non-profit organization funded entirely by private donations. Typically, the cases we accept are handled by lawyers in private practice who donate their time. As a result, we offer legal assistance in only a small number of cases each year.
Consequently, we must choose cases that most clearly invoke significant civil rights and civil liberties issues. We focus on protecting the rights of individuals to be free from excessive government intrusion and the right to receive equal protection under the law. These liberties include the rights of freedom of speech, press and religion, the right to be treated equally and without discrimination on the basis of race and sex, and the right to be free of abusive police conduct. Among these cases, we are forced to limit our representation to “impact cases” i.e., those that present new legal issues or affect large numbers of people.
We cannot assist in cases that depend on establishing facts. We are generally unable to get involved in disputes between private parties, with private employers, or private organizations. We also cannot intervene in a situation where an attorney has already been retained unless the attorney personally requests assistance, and even then, all the other criteria are still in place.
Based on the above criteria, we have concluded the ACLU is unable to provide you assistance. Please be assured, however, that this does not reflect on the worthiness of your case.
I have enclosed the ACLU of Oregon’s Referral and Information sheet. One of the organizations listed may be able to assist you. I regret we are unable to help you further.
Sincerely
(signature)
Kevin Diaz
Legal Director
Enclosure: ACLU OF Oregon Referrals and Information
38. THE PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION FOR THE STUDY OF BIOETHICAL ISSUES - PCSBI, 27/7/11
1425 New York Avenue, NW, Suite C-100, Washington, DC 20005
PHONE 202-233-3960 FAX 202-233-3990 WWW.BIOETHICS.GOV
July 27, 2011
Dear Commenter:
We are writing to advise you on our ongoing work and plans for the next meeting of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. We appreciate the time that you have taken to engage with us.
We would like to clarify for your information that the Commission is not investigating or reviewing any concerns or complaints concerning claims about targeted individuals. This includes claims concerning: MK-ULTRA; COINTELPRO; electromagnetic torture or attacks; organized stalking; remove influencing; microwave harassment; covert harassment and surveillance; human tracking; psychotronic or psychotropic weapons and radio frequency or military weapons or other claims.
As such the Commission will not hear further testimony on these subjects. Many of these issues have been investigated in the past. The Commission is not a law enforcement, regulatory or legislative body. It does not control any federal monies. In addition, the Commission has no involvement with the public or private grants and has no power to open or undertake criminal cases.
As advisors to the President, we will ensure that all of your concerns, information and testimony are provided to the White House. We sincerely appreciate your interest in the work of the Commission and the time you have taken to share your personal history with us.
Sincerely
signature
Valerie H. Bonham
Executive Director
39. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT – ICC- , THE OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR, 27/11/12
Our Reference: OTP-CR-70/07/002
The Hague, Tuesday 27 November 2012
John Finch
tijohnfinch@gmail.com
Dear Sir/Madam
On behalf of the Prosecutor, I acknowledge receipt of your communication received on 1/10/2012.
According to our records, you have sent three or more communications to the Office of the Prosecutor dealing with matters which are substantially the same as those already examined by it.
As noted in our previous responses, the matter described in your communication does not appear to fall within the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (“the Court”), and the Prosecutor has confirmed that there is not a basis to proceed with further analysis in the absence of new facts or evidence.
The Office has carefully examined your latest communication and has re-confirmed that it does not introduce new facts or evidence altering the conclusion that there is not a basis to proceed under the Statute.
I hope you will understand that the Court is governed by Rome Statute, which provides a very specific and carefully defined jurisdiction and mandate over the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole, under strict conditions specified under the Statute. As a result, many serious allegations will be beyond the reach of this institution to address.
Please understand that, given our carefully defined mandate and limited resources, where a person submits a succession of communications or seeks repeatedly to introduce the same matter, the Office is not able to continue further correspondence with that person on subsequent related communications.
Yours Sincerely
M.P. Dillon
Head of the Information & Evidence Unit
Office of the Prosecutor
PO Box 19519, 2500 CM The Hague, The Netherlands
TEL: +31 70 5158515
FAX: +31 70 5158555
www. icc-cpi.int
40. OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS (OHCHR), 5/12/12
from: Petitions OHCHR <petitions@ohchr.org>
to: JUAN LACHESIS <tilachesis@gmail.com>
date: Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:12 PM
subject: Re: Fw: Dear Torture Victims and Friends - Attached are our updated over 1400 electronic torture, abuse and experimentation victims’ case summaries
Dear Sir,
Thank you for alerting us to your case. We have examined your email with attention and we nonetheless regret that the United Nations Secretariat is unable to assist you in the circumstances of your case.
Yours sincerely,
Petitions and Inquiries Section (Section des requêtes et des enquêtes)
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
Pallais des Nations
CH-1211 Genève 10
Switzerland
Fax: +41 22 9179022
41. OPEN SOCIETY JUSTICE INITIATIVE, OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATION, 20/2/13
from: Heena Khaled heena.khaled@opensocietyfoundations.org
to: tijohnfinch@gmail.com" tijohnfinch@gmail.com
date: Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:19 AM
subject: Enquiry Response-Psychotronic Weapons
Dear John,
Many thanks for your email, requesting help from the Open Society Justice Initiative .
We appreciate that you consider us a source for help and are always willing to provide assistance to victims within our reach whom we can provide expert assistance to. However, it is unfortunate that on this occasion the Open Society Justice Initiative cannot provide you the assistance you require, as we do not work in this field at the present moment.
We hope you find the support you require and sincere apologies,
Best Regards,
Heena Khaled | Administrative Associate |Open Society Justice Initiative
Open Society Foundation, 7th Floor, Millbank Tower, 21-24 Millbank, London SW1P 4QP United Kingdom
heena.khaled@opensocietyfoundations.org Tel: +44 (0)20 7031 0256 Fax:+44 (0)20 7031 0201
www.opensocietyfoundations.org/people/heena-khaled
42. OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS (OHCHR), 26/2/13
from: Petitions OHCHR petitions@ohchr.org
to: MCmailteam International mcmailteam@gmail.com
date: 26 februari 2013 05:26
subject: Re: DEAR MS NAVANETHEM PILLAY and the OHCHR - 中国受害者告全世界人民书 An Announcement To The Whole World By Chinese Victims Of Directed Energy And Psychotronic Weapons
Dear Sir or Madam,
We acknowledge receipt of your message of 22 February 2013. May we suggest that you refer to our website for information about the procedures for the examination of individual petitions on human rights violations : www.ohchr.org, (direct link http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/FactSheet7Rev.1en.pdf). If you have difficulty accessing our website, please write to the OHCHR, Information Office PW-RS-011, 1211 Geneva 10, and ask for Human Rights Fact Sheets Nos. 7, 12, 15 and 17.
Please carefully examine the information referred to above and, if you think that your complaint falls within a mandate of one of the UN treaty-bodies, resubmit it to this treaty-body (Committee) with duly filled-in complaint form and copies of all supporting documents.
Sincerely,
A staff member of the Petitions and Inquiries Section
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
Pallais des Nations
CH-1211 Genève 10
Switzerland
Fax: +41 22 9179022
43. THE PRESIDENT OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (EP), MR MARTIN SCHULZ, 9/9/13
From: cites@europarl.europa.eu
To: paulb@crowtherblayne.com.au
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 6:20 PM
Dear Mr Baird,
The President of the European Parliament (EP), Mr Martin Schulz, has received your message concerning Parliamentary Resolution A4-0005/99 and the progress since its adoption.
The Citizens' Enquiry Service of the EP has been asked to reply.
On 6 March 2008, a written question was put to the Commission, asking what action has been taken by the EU since this call was made. If you wish to read the question in full, as well as the Commission's reply, please consult the following webpage.
Since you also refer to the recent NSA surveillance issues, please note that this was a subject of debate at the plenary session in the European Parliament on 3 July. If you wish to consult the debate in full, please click here.
In this regard, the EP adopted a resolutionon 4 July which was approved by 483 votes to 98 with 65 abstentions. According to the press releaseon 8 July, the resolution instructs the EP's Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs(LIBE) to conduct an "in-depth" enquiry into the US surveillance programmes, including the bugging of EU institutions and other spying allegations. The President of the EP, as well as political group leaders, formally confirmed the launch of the enquiry.
In the first hearing, held on 5 September, concerns were voiced by MEPs and key journalists on the impact of US National Security Agency and other surveillance programmes on EU citizens' privacy and media freedom and the lack of democratic oversight of these programmes. For further information, please consult this link.
Finally, to stay informed about the EP's current and future activities please consult our website.
We hope this is of interest and thank you for contacting the European Parliament.
Yours sincerely,
Citizens' Enquiry Service
European Parliament
ref=10844
44. The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), KRISTINA BORROR, DIRECTOR, 6/11/13
Dear Mr. Finch:
The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) has received your November 03, 2013 concerning your experiences.
OHRP has responsibility for oversight of compliance with the Health and Human Services (HHS) regulations for the protection of human research subjects (see 45 CFR Part 46 at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html). In carrying out this responsibility, OHRP evaluates, at OHRP’s discretion, substantive allegations of noncompliance involving human subject research projects conducted or supported by HHS or that are otherwise subject to the regulations (see OHRP memorandum dated October 14, 2009 at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/compliance/ohrpcomp.pdf for an explanation of OHRP’s jurisdiction).
OHRP has determined that it does not have jurisdiction over the matters referenced in your letter. Therefore, OHRP will not be able to pursue this matter on your behalf.
OHRP appreciates your concern about the protection of human research subjects.
Sincerely,
Kristina C. Borror, Ph.D.
Director
Division of Compliance Oversight
Borror, Kristina C (HHS/OASH) Kristina.Borror@hhs.gov
45. The Justice Ministry of Denmark, 16/12/13
Ministry of Justice
Date: 16 December 2013
Office: Security and Prevention Division
Contact: Christian Lund Hansen
Our ref..: 2013-1914-0082
Doc.: 1007043
John Finch
tijohnfinch@gmail.com
The Ministry of Justice has received your e-mail of 18 November 2013 regarding surveillance.
The ministry has read your e-mail but does not find reason to take further action in light of your enquiry.
Yours sincerely
Rasmus Krogh Pedersen
Slotsholmsgade 10, DK-1216 København K.
Phone +45 7226 8400
Fax +45 3393 3510
www.justitsministeriet.dk
jm@jm.dk
46. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT – ICC- , THE OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR, 9/4/14
From OTP InformationDesk OTP.InformationDesk@icc-cpi.int
To John Finch <tilachesis@gmail.com>,
mcmailteam <MCmailteam@gmail.com>
Dear Sir/Madam,
Thank you for your message. Please note that the International Criminal Court has a very limited jurisdiction. The Court may only address the crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes as defined by Articles 6 to 8 of the Rome Statute that have occurred after 2002, and can only exercise jurisdiction in the countries that have ratified it. For more information on the Court’s jurisdiction and the full text of the Rome Statute, please refer to page 2 of the attached document and our website, www.icc-cpi.int. We encourage you to carefully review this information.
If, after your careful review, you still believe the ICC is the correct place for your case and would like to submit a claim to the Court, then please follow the directions for how to do so on page 1 of the attached document. If you decide to submit information, kindly use only this email address : otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int.
Kind regards,
OTP Information Desk
International Criminal Court
46. ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, 21/5/14
From Amul Kalia info@eff.org
To tilachesis@gmail.com
21/5/14
Re: [#VX-M9271] NON-CONSENSUAL EXPERIMENTATION WITH ELECTROMAGNETIC WEAPONS
Thank you for contacting the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF).
Unfortunately, the situation you describe is outside of EFF's area of focus. And we will not be able to represent you. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is a small, grassroots legal advocacy non-profit focused on defending civil liberties and constitutional rights online with very limited resources. EFF focuses on impact litigation at the federal level--usually questions or legal concepts never before seen by the courts. As such, we have a very important but narrowly focused mission and are not equipped to address all issues outside that limited scope. However, your local bar association should be able to refer you to an attorney for an initial consultation for a small fee.
I am sorry that we are unable to directly represent you and wish you the best of luck.
Regards,
Amul Kalia
Electronic Frontier Foundation
(415) 436-9333
info@eff.org
AND THAT'S ALL THE RESPONSES WE'VE HAD SINCE 2004!!
PLEASE CONTACT US FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:-
Yours in the search for openness and respect for universal human rights
John Finch, 5/8 Kemp St, Thornbury, Vic 3071, Australia, TEL: 0424009627
EMAIL: tijohnfinch@gmail.com, MCmailteam@gmail.com
FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/john.finch.16547?ref=profile
TARGETED INDIVIDUAL and a member of THE WORLDWIDE CAMPAIGN AGAINST ELECTRONIC TORTURE, ABUSE AND EXPERIMENTATION
